eyeling 1.6.13 → 1.6.14
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/examples/output/age.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/alignment-demo.n3 +0 -572
- package/examples/output/backward.n3 +0 -15
- package/examples/output/basic-monadic.n3 +0 -105
- package/examples/output/brussels-brew-club.n3 +0 -476
- package/examples/output/cat-koko.n3 +0 -108
- package/examples/output/cobalt-kepler-kitchen.n3 +0 -7064
- package/examples/output/complex.n3 +0 -46
- package/examples/output/control-system.n3 +0 -75
- package/examples/output/cranberry-calculus.n3 +0 -1313
- package/examples/output/crypto-builtins-tests.n3 +0 -60
- package/examples/output/deep-taxonomy-10.n3 +0 -602
- package/examples/output/deep-taxonomy-100.n3 +1 -5733
- package/examples/output/deep-taxonomy-1000.n3 +1 -57033
- package/examples/output/deep-taxonomy-10000.n3 +1 -570033
- package/examples/output/derived-backward-rule-2.n3 +0 -58
- package/examples/output/derived-backward-rule.n3 +0 -44
- package/examples/output/derived-rule.n3 +0 -42
- package/examples/output/dijkstra.n3 +0 -297
- package/examples/output/dog.n3 +0 -30
- package/examples/output/drone-corridor-planner.n3 +0 -799
- package/examples/output/easter.n3 +0 -3570
- package/examples/output/equals.n3 +0 -15
- package/examples/output/ev-roundtrip-planner.n3 +0 -392
- package/examples/output/existential-rule.n3 +0 -34
- package/examples/output/expression-eval.n3 +0 -20
- package/examples/output/family-cousins.n3 +0 -636
- package/examples/output/fibonacci.n3 +0 -36
- package/examples/output/french-cities.n3 +0 -484
- package/examples/output/good-cobbler.n3 +0 -22
- package/examples/output/gps.n3 +0 -62
- package/examples/output/gray-code-counter.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/hanoi.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/jade-eigen-loom.n3 +0 -4690
- package/examples/output/json-pointer.n3 +0 -529
- package/examples/output/json-reconcile-vat.n3 +0 -12882
- package/examples/output/light-eaters.n3 +0 -311
- package/examples/output/list-builtins-tests.n3 +0 -167
- package/examples/output/list-iterate.n3 +0 -124
- package/examples/output/lldm.n3 +0 -960
- package/examples/output/log-collect-all-in.n3 +0 -117
- package/examples/output/log-for-all-in.n3 +0 -27
- package/examples/output/log-not-includes.n3 +0 -59
- package/examples/output/log-skolem.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/log-uri.n3 +0 -42
- package/examples/output/math-builtins-tests.n3 +0 -4434
- package/examples/output/minimal-skos-alignment.n3 +0 -39
- package/examples/output/monkey.n3 +0 -36
- package/examples/output/odrl-trust.n3 +0 -46
- package/examples/output/oslo-steps-library-scholarly.n3 +0 -1260
- package/examples/output/oslo-steps-workflow-composition.n3 +0 -180
- package/examples/output/peano.n3 +0 -23
- package/examples/output/pi.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/pillar.n3 +0 -32
- package/examples/output/polygon.n3 +0 -17
- package/examples/output/rdf-list.n3 +0 -28
- package/examples/output/reordering.n3 +0 -26
- package/examples/output/ruby-runge-workshop.n3 +0 -613
- package/examples/output/rule-matching.n3 +0 -26
- package/examples/output/saffron-slopeworks.n3 +0 -1447
- package/examples/output/self-referential.n3 +0 -81
- package/examples/output/similar.n3 +0 -15
- package/examples/output/snaf.n3 +0 -23
- package/examples/output/socrates.n3 +0 -21
- package/examples/output/spectral-week.n3 +0 -350
- package/examples/output/string-builtins-tests.n3 +0 -240
- package/examples/output/topaz-markov-mill.n3 +0 -4178
- package/examples/output/traffic-skos-aggregate.n3 +0 -3151
- package/examples/output/turing.n3 +0 -36
- package/examples/output/ultramarine-simpson-forge.n3 +0 -3873
- package/examples/output/witch.n3 +0 -107
- package/examples/output/zebra.n3 +0 -111
- package/eyeling.js +97 -18
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/test/examples.test.js +1 -1
|
@@ -3,187 +3,7 @@
|
|
|
3
3
|
@prefix step: <https://example.org/steps#> .
|
|
4
4
|
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
7
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
8
|
-
# :bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20400"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9079107344999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6636569280000001"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
9
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
10
|
-
# state:s5 :formula {
|
|
11
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
12
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
13
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
14
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
15
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
16
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
17
|
-
# } .
|
|
18
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath ({
|
|
19
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
20
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
21
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
22
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
23
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
24
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
25
|
-
# } (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20400"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9079107344999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6636569280000001"^^xsd:decimal (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
26
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
27
|
-
# {
|
|
28
|
-
# state:s5 :formula ?GOAL .
|
|
29
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath (?GOAL ?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
30
|
-
# } => {
|
|
31
|
-
# :bob gps:path (?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT) .
|
|
32
|
-
# } .
|
|
33
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
34
|
-
# ?COST = "4"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
35
|
-
# ?DUR = "20400"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
36
|
-
# ?GOAL = {
|
|
37
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
38
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
39
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
40
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
41
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
42
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
43
|
-
# }
|
|
44
|
-
# ?PATH = (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice)
|
|
45
|
-
# ?SAT = "0.6636569280000001"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
46
|
-
# ?SUC = "0.9079107344999999"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
47
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
48
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
6
|
:bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20400"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9079107344999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6636569280000001"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
53
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
54
|
-
# :bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20370"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9365815997999998"^^xsd:decimal "0.67874004"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
55
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
56
|
-
# state:s5 :formula {
|
|
57
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
58
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
59
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
60
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
61
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
62
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
63
|
-
# } .
|
|
64
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath ({
|
|
65
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
66
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
67
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
68
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
69
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
70
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
71
|
-
# } (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20370"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9365815997999998"^^xsd:decimal "0.67874004"^^xsd:decimal (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
72
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
73
|
-
# {
|
|
74
|
-
# state:s5 :formula ?GOAL .
|
|
75
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath (?GOAL ?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
76
|
-
# } => {
|
|
77
|
-
# :bob gps:path (?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT) .
|
|
78
|
-
# } .
|
|
79
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
80
|
-
# ?COST = "2"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
81
|
-
# ?DUR = "20370"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
82
|
-
# ?GOAL = {
|
|
83
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
84
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
85
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
86
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
87
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
88
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
89
|
-
# }
|
|
90
|
-
# ?PATH = (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice)
|
|
91
|
-
# ?SAT = "0.67874004"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
92
|
-
# ?SUC = "0.9365815997999998"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
93
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
94
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
7
|
:bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataDesk step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20370"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9365815997999998"^^xsd:decimal "0.67874004"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
99
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
100
|
-
# :bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20355"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9033483689999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6938231520000001"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
101
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
102
|
-
# state:s5 :formula {
|
|
103
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
104
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
105
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
106
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
107
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
108
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
109
|
-
# } .
|
|
110
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath ({
|
|
111
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
112
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
113
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
114
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
115
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
116
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
117
|
-
# } (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20355"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9033483689999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6938231520000001"^^xsd:decimal (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
118
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
119
|
-
# {
|
|
120
|
-
# state:s5 :formula ?GOAL .
|
|
121
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath (?GOAL ?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
122
|
-
# } => {
|
|
123
|
-
# :bob gps:path (?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT) .
|
|
124
|
-
# } .
|
|
125
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
126
|
-
# ?COST = "4"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
127
|
-
# ?DUR = "20355"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
128
|
-
# ?GOAL = {
|
|
129
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
130
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
131
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
132
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
133
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
134
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
135
|
-
# }
|
|
136
|
-
# ?PATH = (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice)
|
|
137
|
-
# ?SAT = "0.6938231520000001"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
138
|
-
# ?SUC = "0.9033483689999999"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
139
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
140
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
8
|
:bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangePostal step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20355"^^xsd:decimal "4"^^xsd:decimal "0.9033483689999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.6938231520000001"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
145
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
146
|
-
# :bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20325"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9318751595999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.70959186"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
147
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
148
|
-
# state:s5 :formula {
|
|
149
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
150
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
151
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
152
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
153
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
154
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
155
|
-
# } .
|
|
156
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath ({
|
|
157
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
158
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
159
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
160
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
161
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
162
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
163
|
-
# } (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20325"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9318751595999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.70959186"^^xsd:decimal (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
164
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
165
|
-
# {
|
|
166
|
-
# state:s5 :formula ?GOAL .
|
|
167
|
-
# :scope gps:findpath (?GOAL ?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT (40320.0 20.0 0.80 0.65)) .
|
|
168
|
-
# } => {
|
|
169
|
-
# :bob gps:path (?PATH ?DUR ?COST ?SUC ?SAT) .
|
|
170
|
-
# } .
|
|
171
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
172
|
-
# ?COST = "2"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
173
|
-
# ?DUR = "20325"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
174
|
-
# ?GOAL = {
|
|
175
|
-
# var:x a o-persoon:Inwoner .
|
|
176
|
-
# var:x ex:personalInfoProvided true .
|
|
177
|
-
# var:x ex:movingDataProvided true .
|
|
178
|
-
# var:x ex:newAddressProvided true .
|
|
179
|
-
# var:x ex:addressChangeDeclared true .
|
|
180
|
-
# var:x ex:confirmationOfAddressChange true .
|
|
181
|
-
# }
|
|
182
|
-
# ?PATH = (step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice)
|
|
183
|
-
# ?SAT = "0.70959186"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
184
|
-
# ?SUC = "0.9318751595999999"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
185
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
186
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
187
|
-
|
|
188
9
|
:bob gps:path ((step:providePersonalInfoOnline step:provideMovingDataOnline step:provideNewAddress step:declareAddressChangeOnline step:confirmAddressChangePolice) "20325"^^xsd:decimal "2"^^xsd:decimal "0.9318751595999999"^^xsd:decimal "0.70959186"^^xsd:decimal) .
|
|
189
|
-
|
package/examples/output/peano.n3
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,26 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix : <http://example.org/#> .
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
5
|
-
# (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0))))) :peanoFactorial (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) .
|
|
6
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
7
|
-
# ((:s 0) (:s (:s 0))) :multiply (:s (:s 0)) .
|
|
8
|
-
# ((:s (:s 0)) (:s (:s (:s 0)))) :add (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0))))) .
|
|
9
|
-
# (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0))))) :factorial (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) .
|
|
10
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
11
|
-
# {
|
|
12
|
-
# ((:s 0) (:s (:s 0))) :multiply ?A .
|
|
13
|
-
# (?A (:s (:s (:s 0)))) :add ?B .
|
|
14
|
-
# ?B :factorial ?C .
|
|
15
|
-
# } => {
|
|
16
|
-
# ?B :peanoFactorial ?C .
|
|
17
|
-
# } .
|
|
18
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
19
|
-
# ?A = (:s (:s 0))
|
|
20
|
-
# ?B = (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0)))))
|
|
21
|
-
# ?C = (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
|
|
22
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
23
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
3
|
(:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0))))) :peanoFactorial (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s (:s 0)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) .
|
|
26
|
-
|
package/examples/output/pi.n3
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,21 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/eye/reasoning#> .
|
|
2
2
|
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
|
|
3
3
|
|
|
4
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
5
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
6
|
-
# (100 "3.1415929035585526"^^xsd:decimal) :pi true .
|
|
7
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
8
|
-
# (100 "3.1415929035585526"^^xsd:decimal) :pi true .
|
|
9
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
10
|
-
# {
|
|
11
|
-
# (100 ?Pi) :pi true .
|
|
12
|
-
# } => {
|
|
13
|
-
# (100 ?Pi) :pi true .
|
|
14
|
-
# } .
|
|
15
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
16
|
-
# ?Pi = "3.1415929035585526"^^xsd:decimal
|
|
17
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
18
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
4
|
(100 "3.1415929035585526"^^xsd:decimal) :pi true .
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
@@ -1,36 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix : <http://example.org/socrates#> .
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
5
|
-
# :result :is :Post .
|
|
6
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
7
|
-
# :Pillar :to :Post .
|
|
8
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
9
|
-
# {
|
|
10
|
-
# :Pillar :to ?What .
|
|
11
|
-
# } => {
|
|
12
|
-
# :result :is ?What .
|
|
13
|
-
# } .
|
|
14
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
15
|
-
# ?What = :Post
|
|
16
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
17
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
3
|
:result :is :Post .
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
22
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
23
|
-
# :test :is true .
|
|
24
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
25
|
-
# :result :is :Post .
|
|
26
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
27
|
-
# {
|
|
28
|
-
# :result :is :Post .
|
|
29
|
-
# } => {
|
|
30
|
-
# :test :is true .
|
|
31
|
-
# } .
|
|
32
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
33
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
4
|
:test :is true .
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
@@ -1,20 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix polygon: <https://eyereasoner.github.io/eye/reasoning/polygon#> .
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
5
|
-
# ((4 2) (6 2) (7 6) (4 6) (5 5) (5 3) (4 2)) polygon:area 7 .
|
|
6
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
7
|
-
# ((4 2) (6 2) (7 6) (4 6) (5 5) (5 3) (4 2)) polygon:area 7 .
|
|
8
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
9
|
-
# {
|
|
10
|
-
# ((4 2) (6 2) (7 6) (4 6) (5 5) (5 3) (4 2)) polygon:area ?AREA .
|
|
11
|
-
# } => {
|
|
12
|
-
# ((4 2) (6 2) (7 6) (4 6) (5 5) (5 3) (4 2)) polygon:area ?AREA .
|
|
13
|
-
# } .
|
|
14
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
15
|
-
# ?AREA = 7
|
|
16
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
17
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
3
|
((4 2) (6 2) (7 6) (4 6) (5 5) (5 3) (4 2)) polygon:area 7 .
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
@@ -1,31 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix : <http://example.org/ns#> .
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
5
|
-
# :result :is true .
|
|
6
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
7
|
-
# :X :val (1 2) .
|
|
8
|
-
# (1 2) :head 1 .
|
|
9
|
-
# (1 2) :tail (2) .
|
|
10
|
-
# 1 log:equalTo 1 .
|
|
11
|
-
# (2) log:equalTo (2) .
|
|
12
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
13
|
-
# {
|
|
14
|
-
# ?X :val ?Y .
|
|
15
|
-
# ?Y :head ?H .
|
|
16
|
-
# ?Y :tail ?T .
|
|
17
|
-
# ?H log:equalTo 1 .
|
|
18
|
-
# ?T log:equalTo (2) .
|
|
19
|
-
# } => {
|
|
20
|
-
# :result :is true .
|
|
21
|
-
# } .
|
|
22
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
23
|
-
# ?H = 1
|
|
24
|
-
# ?T = (2)
|
|
25
|
-
# ?X = :X
|
|
26
|
-
# ?Y = (1 2)
|
|
27
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
28
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
3
|
:result :is true .
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
@@ -1,29 +1,3 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
@prefix : <https://eyereasoner.github.io/ns#> .
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
4
|
-
# Proof for derived triple:
|
|
5
|
-
# :test :is true .
|
|
6
|
-
# It holds because the following instance of the rule body is provable:
|
|
7
|
-
# :Bob :has (:Table 1) .
|
|
8
|
-
# :Alice :has (:Book 1) .
|
|
9
|
-
# :Table log:notEqualTo :Book .
|
|
10
|
-
# via the schematic forward rule:
|
|
11
|
-
# {
|
|
12
|
-
# ?W1 :has (?O1 ?N1) .
|
|
13
|
-
# ?W2 :has (?O2 ?N2) .
|
|
14
|
-
# ?O1 log:notEqualTo ?O2 .
|
|
15
|
-
# } => {
|
|
16
|
-
# :test :is true .
|
|
17
|
-
# } .
|
|
18
|
-
# with substitution (on rule variables):
|
|
19
|
-
# ?N1 = 1
|
|
20
|
-
# ?N2 = 1
|
|
21
|
-
# ?O1 = :Table
|
|
22
|
-
# ?O2 = :Book
|
|
23
|
-
# ?W1 = :Bob
|
|
24
|
-
# ?W2 = :Alice
|
|
25
|
-
# Therefore the derived triple above is entailed by the rules and facts.
|
|
26
|
-
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
3
|
:test :is true .
|
|
29
|
-
|