aiox-core 5.0.2 → 5.0.3

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/checklists/mind-validation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,374 @@
+# Mind Validation Checklist
+
+**Purpose:** Validate if a mind has sufficient documentation to be cloned into an agent
+**Used by:** `workflows/mind-research-loop.md` (Iteration 3)
+**Quality Gate:** BLOCKING - minds that fail CANNOT enter the squad
+
+---
+
+## Philosophy
+
+> "It doesn't matter if someone is the best in the world if there's no documented process we can replicate."
+
+**Absolute Criterion:**
+```
+"Is there sufficient documentation of this person's processes
+for an agent to replicate the method?"
+
+- YES → Proceeds to next validation
+- NO → CUT, no matter how famous they are
+```
+
+---
+
+## Quick Validation (5 Mandatory Criteria)
+
+### Scoring System
+
+| Criterion | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
+|-----------|---|---|---|---|
+| **Documented Framework** | Doesn't exist | Vaguely mentioned | Partially documented | Fully documented |
+| **Extractable Process** | No process | Loose tips | General steps | Clear step-by-step |
+| **Available Artifacts** | Nothing | Concepts only | Some templates | Templates + Checklists |
+| **Application Examples** | None | Mentions | Some cases | Detailed cases |
+| **Accessible Material** | Doesn't exist | Hard to find | Partially accessible | Easily accessible |
+
+### Thresholds
+
+| Total Score | Status | Action |
+|-------------|--------|--------|
+| 12-15 | ✅ PASS | Include in squad |
+| 10-11 | ⚠️ CONDITIONAL | Include with caveats |
+| 7-9 | ❌ FAIL | Seek alternative |
+| 0-6 | 🚫 HARD FAIL | Discard |
+
+**Minimum to pass: 10/15**
+
+---
+
+## 1. DOCUMENTED FRAMEWORK
+
+### What to look for:
+
+- [ ] **Framework/methodology has its own name**
+  - Ex: "AIDA", "StoryBrand", "Jobs to be Done"
+  - Red flag: Only "X's methodology" without specific name
+
+- [ ] **Defined structure**
+  - Ex: "5 steps", "3 pillars", "7 principles"
+  - Red flag: Vague concepts without structure
+
+- [ ] **Official documentation**
+  - Book, course, certification, official website
+  - Red flag: Only mentions in third-party articles
+
+### Validation Questions:
+
+```yaml
+questions:
+  - "What is the NAME of this person's framework?"
+  - "Does this framework have a DEFINED STRUCTURE (steps, phases, components)?"
+  - "Where is it OFFICIALLY DOCUMENTED?"
+```
+
+### Scoring:
+
+| Score | Criterion |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No identifiable framework exists |
+| 1 | Has "approach" but no formal structure |
+| 2 | Framework exists, partially documented |
+| 3 | Framework with name, structure, and complete documentation |
+
+---
+
+## 2. EXTRACTABLE PROCESS
+
+### What to look for:
+
+- [ ] **Clear sequence of steps**
+  - "First do X, then Y, then Z"
+  - Red flag: "It's more art than science"
+
+- [ ] **Documented decisions**
+  - "If A happens, do B"
+  - Red flag: Depends 100% on intuition
+
+- [ ] **Entry/exit criteria**
+  - "Start when you have X, finish when Y"
+  - Red flag: Vague process without clear start/end
+
+### Validation Questions:
+
+```yaml
+questions:
+  - "Is there a documented STEP-BY-STEP process?"
+  - "Are the steps SEQUENTIAL and clear?"
+  - "Could a beginner FOLLOW the process?"
+```
+
+### Scoring:
+
+| Score | Criterion |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No identifiable process |
+| 1 | Loose tips and principles, not sequential |
+| 2 | General process exists, but has gaps |
+| 3 | Complete and clear step-by-step process |
+
+---
+
+## 3. AVAILABLE ARTIFACTS
+
+### What to look for:
+
+- [ ] **Templates**
+  - Fillable structures, blueprints
+  - Ex: "Gary Halbert's Sales Page Template"
+
+- [ ] **Checklists**
+  - Verification lists derived from the method
+  - Ex: "Copy Review Checklist"
+
+- [ ] **Visual frameworks**
+  - Diagrams, matrices, canvases
+  - Ex: "Business Model Canvas"
+
+- [ ] **Annotated examples**
+  - Expert's work with analysis
+  - Ex: "Sales letter X line by line"
+
+### Validation Questions:
+
+```yaml
+questions:
+  - "Are there TEMPLATES we can use?"
+  - "Are there CHECKLISTS derived from the method?"
+  - "Are there ANNOTATED EXAMPLES of this person's work?"
+```
+
+### Scoring:
+
+| Score | Criterion |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No artifacts found |
+| 1 | Only concepts, no practical artifacts |
+| 2 | Some templates or checklists |
+| 3 | Templates + Checklists + Annotated examples |
+
+---
+
+## 4. APPLICATION EXAMPLES
+
+### What to look for:
+
+- [ ] **Expert's own work**
+  - Portfolios, cases, projects
+  - Ex: Gary Halbert's sales letters
+
+- [ ] **Documented success cases**
+  - Measurable results
+  - Ex: "This letter generated $X million"
+
+- [ ] **Before/After**
+  - Comparisons showing the method in action
+  - Ex: "Copy before vs after revision"
+
+- [ ] **Third-party analysis**
+  - Breakdowns, case studies
+  - Ex: "Why letter X worked"
+
+### Validation Questions:
+
+```yaml
+questions:
+  - "Are there WORKS BY THE EXPERT THEMSELVES that we can analyze?"
+  - "Are there SUCCESS CASES with measurable results?"
+  - "Are there DETAILED ANALYSES of examples?"
+```
+
+### Scoring:
+
+| Score | Criterion |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | No examples found |
+| 1 | Vague mentions without details |
+| 2 | Some documented cases |
+| 3 | Multiple detailed cases with analysis |
+
+---
+
+## 5. ACCESSIBLE MATERIAL
+
+### What to look for:
+
+- [ ] **Published books**
+  - Available for purchase/download
+  - In English or Portuguese
+
+- [ ] **Courses/Trainings**
+  - Online or documented in-person
+  - Transcripts available
+
+- [ ] **Articles/Newsletters**
+  - Accessible archive
+  - Substantial content
+
+- [ ] **Interviews/Podcasts**
+  - Transcripts or recordings
+  - Deep content (not superficial)
+
+### Validation Questions:
+
+```yaml
+questions:
+  - "Is the material ACCESSIBLE (purchasable, downloadable)?"
+  - "Is there SUFFICIENT QUANTITY of material?"
+  - "Does the material have DEPTH (not superficial)?"
+```
+
+### Scoring:
+
+| Score | Criterion |
+|-------|----------|
+| 0 | Material doesn't exist or is inaccessible |
+| 1 | Hard to find, little material |
+| 2 | Material exists but partially accessible |
+| 3 | Abundant easily accessible material |
+
+---
+
+## Validation Report Template
+
+```markdown
+# Mind Validation: {Expert Name}
+
+**Date:** {date}
+**Domain:** {domain}
+**Validator:** {automated/manual}
+
+---
+
+## Quick Score
+
+| Criterion | Score | Evidence |
+|----------|-------|----------|
+| Documented Framework | {0-3} | {source/link} |
+| Extractable Process | {0-3} | {source/link} |
+| Available Artifacts | {0-3} | {type found} |
+| Application Examples | {0-3} | {quantity} |
+| Accessible Material | {0-3} | {type/where} |
+| **TOTAL** | **{X}/15** | |
+
+---
+
+## Status: {PASS/CONDITIONAL/FAIL/HARD_FAIL}
+
+---
+
+## Identified Framework
+
+**Name:** {framework name}
+**Structure:** {structure description}
+**Official source:** {link/book}
+
+---
+
+## Material Found
+
+### Books
+- {title} - {where to find}
+
+### Courses
+- {title} - {where to find}
+
+### Articles/Transcripts
+- {title} - {link}
+
+### Analyzable Examples
+- {description} - {where to find}
+
+---
+
+## Identified Gaps
+
+- {gap 1}
+- {gap 2}
+
+---
+
+## Recommendation
+
+{INCLUDE IN SQUAD / INCLUDE WITH CAVEATS / SEEK ALTERNATIVE / DISCARD}
+
+**Justification:** {reason for decision}
+
+---
+
+## Next Steps (if PASS)
+
+1. Execute `deep-research-pre-agent.md` for {expert}
+2. Focus on: {specific areas to research}
+3. Priority material: {specific book/course}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Red Flags (Automatic Cut)
+
+### Cut immediately if:
+
+- [ ] **Only has fame, no framework**
+  - "Influencer" without own methodology
+
+- [ ] **Framework belongs to others**
+  - Person only teaches/popularizes, didn't create
+
+- [ ] **No examples of own work**
+  - Only theory, no demonstrated practice
+
+- [ ] **Inaccessible material**
+  - Died without leaving documented legacy
+  - Material in inaccessible language
+  - Content lost/offline
+
+- [ ] **Only one old book**
+  - No updates or complementary material
+  - Context too outdated
+
+---
+
+## Validation Workflow
+
+```
+1. Identify expert name
+   ↓
+2. Search for main framework
+   → If doesn't exist → HARD FAIL
+   ↓
+3. Verify process documentation
+   → If vague/nonexistent → FAIL
+   ↓
+4. Catalog available artifacts
+   → If none → FAIL
+   ↓
+5. List examples found
+   → If few → CONDITIONAL
+   ↓
+6. Verify material accessibility
+   → If inaccessible → FAIL
+   ↓
+7. Calculate total score
+   → < 10 → FAIL
+   → 10-11 → CONDITIONAL
+   → 12+ → PASS
+   ↓
+8. Generate report
+```
+
+---
+
+**Checklist Version:** 1.0.0
+**Created:** 2026-01-25
+**Part of:** squads/squad-creator
+**Used by:** workflows/mind-research-loop.md