aiox-core 5.0.2 → 5.0.3

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/_template.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+# Test Case Template for Model Tier Qualification
+# Copy this file and customize for each task
+
+# ============================================================================
+# TEST CASE METADATA
+# ============================================================================
+
+test_case:
+  name: "{task-name}-standard"
+  version: "1.0"
+  created: "2026-02-11"
+  task_file: "tasks/{task-name}.md"
+  skill_file: ".claude/skills/{task-name}/SKILL.md"
+
+# ============================================================================
+# INPUT
+# ============================================================================
+# Real data to use for testing. Must be representative of actual usage.
+
+input:
+  # Primary target (file path or value)
+  target: "path/to/real/test/data"
+
+  # Additional parameters
+  params:
+    param_1: "value_1"
+    param_2: "value_2"
+
+  # Context files to load (if any)
+  context_files:
+    - "path/to/context/file.md"
+
+# ============================================================================
+# EXPECTED OUTPUT
+# ============================================================================
+# Define what a correct output looks like
+
+expected_output:
+  # Required sections in the output
+  sections:
+    - section_name_1
+    - section_name_2
+    - section_name_3
+
+  # Required fields with types
+  fields:
+    - name: "overall_score"
+      type: "number"
+      range: [0, 10]
+    - name: "status"
+      type: "enum"
+      values: ["PASS", "FAIL", "REVIEW"]
+    - name: "recommendations"
+      type: "array"
+      min_items: 0
+
+  # Business rules to validate
+  validations:
+    - "overall_score deve ser numérico entre 0-10"
+    - "status deve ser PASS se score >= 7.0"
+    - "status deve ser FAIL se score < 7.0 ou veto triggered"
+    - "recommendations deve existir se score < 8"
+
+# ============================================================================
+# BASELINE
+# ============================================================================
+# Reference to Opus output (gold standard)
+
+baseline:
+  opus_output: "opus-baseline.yaml"  # Relative to test-cases/{task-name}/
+  opus_score: 10.0  # By definition, Opus is 100%
+  opus_tokens:
+    input: 0      # Fill after first run
+    output: 0     # Fill after first run
+  opus_latency_ms: 0  # Fill after first run
+
+# ============================================================================
+# EVALUATION CRITERIA
+# ============================================================================
+# Task-specific criteria for each dimension
+
+evaluation:
+  completeness:
+    required_sections:
+      - "section_1: description of what it should contain"
+      - "section_2: description of what it should contain"
+    optional_sections:
+      - "section_3: nice to have"
+
+  accuracy:
+    numeric_tolerance: 0.05  # 5% tolerance for scores
+    enum_exact_match: true   # Status must match exactly
+
+  reasoning:
+    minimum_justifications: 3  # At least 3 justified points
+    requires_evidence: true    # Must cite specific evidence
+
+  format:
+    expected_format: "yaml"
+    parseable: true
+
+  actionability:
+    minimum_recommendations: 1
+    specificity: "high"  # high, medium, low
+
+# ============================================================================
+# COMPENSATION ATTEMPTS
+# ============================================================================
+# Track what compensations were tried and their results
+
+compensation_history:
+  # Filled during validation process
+  attempts: []
+  # Example:
+  # - attempt: 1
+  #   type: "output_examples"
+  #   score_before: 7.5
+  #   score_after: 8.2
+  #   effective: true
+
+# ============================================================================
+# RESULTS
+# ============================================================================
+# Filled after running validation
+
+results:
+  # All output files are relative to test-cases/{task-name}/
+  haiku:
+    score: null
+    percentage: null
+    qualified: null
+    output_file: "haiku-output.yaml"
+
+  sonnet:
+    score: null
+    percentage: null
+    qualified: null
+    output_file: "sonnet-output.yaml"
+
+  opus:
+    score: 10.0  # Baseline
+    percentage: 100
+    qualified: true
+    output_file: "opus-baseline.yaml"
+
+  final_tier: null  # haiku | sonnet | opus
+  recommendation: null

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/an-assess-sources/ASSESSMENT-SUMMARY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,275 @@
+# Alex Hormozi Sources Assessment v2.0 - Summary Report
+
+**Date:** 2026-02-11
+**Mind:** Alex Hormozi
+**Total Sources Assessed:** 4
+**Assessment Method:** 25 Binary Checkpoints (5 Dimensions × 5 Checkpoints)
+
+---
+
+## Executive Summary
+
+**Overall Quality Score:** 4.2/5.0 (Excellent)
+
+- **Crown Jewel:** 1 source (25%)
+- **Ouro (Gold):** 3 sources (75%)
+- **Mixed:** 0 sources
+- **Bronze:** 0 sources
+
+**Verdict:** Alex Hormozi's documented sources represent **premium-quality material** for mind cloning. The top 3 sources form a complete trinity: Theory (Value Equation) + Methodology (Divergent Thinking) + Implementation (Lead Generation & Money Models).
+
+---
+
+## Individual Source Rankings
+
+### 1. **Livro $100M Ofertas - Capítulo 6 (A Equação de Valor)** ⭐ CROWN JEWEL
+**Overall Score: 5.0/5.0**
+
+| Dimension | Score | Justification |
+|-----------|-------|---------------|
+| **Autenticidade** | 5/5 | Real examples (San Diego gym, photography), admits past mistakes, no teleprompter feel |
+| **Profundidade** | 5/5 | Complete 4-pillar framework with trade-offs and cross-domain connections |
+| **Atualidade** | 5/5 | Published 2022, timelessly applicable in 2026 |
+| **Unicidade** | 5/5 | Original "Equation of Value" framework not seen elsewhere; counter-mainstream thinking |
+| **Completude** | 5/5 | 40 pages, visual formula, 3+ real examples, edge cases covered |
+
+**Why Crown Jewel?**
+This chapter is the **intellectual foundation** of Alex's entire system. Without understanding how to quantify value (Dream Outcome + Perceived Probability - Time Delay - Effort), nothing else works. This is 80% of his strategic thinking.
+
+**Extraction Priority: #1 (URGENT)**
+
+**Key Frameworks to Capture:**
+- The 4-pillar Value Equation formula
+- Dream Outcome concept (status-driven desires)
+- Psychological vs Logical solutions mental model
+- Risk reversal and proof social principles
+
+---
+
+### 2. **Livro $100M Ofertas - Capítulo 8 (O Processo de Pensamento)** 🥇 OURO
+**Overall Score: 4.8/5.0**
+
+| Dimension | Score | Justification |
+|-----------|-------|---------------|
+| **Autenticidade** | 5/5 | Personal, conversational, interactive (asks reader to do Brick Exercise NOW) |
+| **Profundidade** | 5/5 | Convergent vs Divergent thinking framework with specific examples |
+| **Atualidade** | 5/5 | Timeless - creative thinking never goes out of style |
+| **Unicidade** | 4/5 | Framework not original (Edward de Bono), but application to offers is unique |
+| **Completude** | 5/5 | Practical exercise (120 seconds), 20 brick use cases, 25 pages |
+
+**Why Ouro?**
+This chapter explains **how Alex generates multiple offer variations**. Theory (Ch 6) tells you WHAT value is; this chapter tells you HOW to create 10 variations of the same product.
+
+**Extraction Priority: #2 (HIGH)**
+
+**Key Frameworks to Capture:**
+- Convergent (mathematics) vs Divergent (creativity) thinking
+- The Brick Exercise methodology
+- How to generate 10+ variations of one product
+- Problem-solution iteration patterns
+
+---
+
+### 3. **Livro $100M Leads - Seção I & II** 🥇 OURO
+**Overall Score: 4.8/5.0**
+
+| Dimension | Score | Justification |
+|-----------|-------|---------------|
+| **Autenticidade** | 5/5 | Raw personal stories ($150k refunds, bankruptcy, honest failures) |
+| **Profundidade** | 5/5 | Core Four framework, 7-step Lead Magnet methodology, psychological connections |
+| **Atualidade** | 5/5 | 2022 publication, strategies 100% applicable in 2026 |
+| **Unicidade** | 4/5 | Core Four is simplification of 2×2 matrix (not novel), but Lead Magnet concept is original |
+| **Completude** | 5/5 | 100 pages, real numbers ($6k first sale, $60k single day, $215k monthly profit) |
+
+**Why Ouro?**
+This section is **how Alex created infinite demand**. Without demand, perfect offers die. The Core Four (Warm Outreach, Content, Cold Outreach, Paid Ads) are the ONLY 4 ways to generate leads.
+
+**Extraction Priority: #3 (HIGH)**
+
+**Key Frameworks to Capture:**
+- Core Four lead generation channels
+- Lead vs Engaged Lead distinction
+- 7-step Lead Magnet creation process
+- Historical journey from bankruptcy to $4.4M/month
+- Lead Magnet types: Reveal Problem, Sample/Trial, One Step of Multi-Step Process
+
+---
+
+### 4. **Livro $100m Modelos - Framework Completo + Insights** 🥇 OURO
+**Overall Score: 4.4/5.0**
+
+| Dimension | Score | Justification |
+|-----------|-------|---------------|
+| **Autenticidade** | 3/5 | More didactic/structured than narrative; less personal storytelling |
+| **Profundidade** | 5/5 | 3-stage framework (Get/More/Max Money), decision trees, multiple sub-frameworks |
+| **Atualidade** | 5/5 | 2022 publication, timeless business model architecture |
+| **Unicidade** | 4/5 | 3-stages is original; counter-mainstream (first sale doesn't need profit) |
+| **Completude** | 5/5 | 80 pages, 5 templates, checklists, McDonald's/rental car/gym examples, 30-60-90 plan |
+
+**Why Ouro?**
+This section is **operationalization**. It takes Value Equation (What) + Divergent Thinking (How) + Lead Generation (Demand) and creates the actual business machine. 3-Stages tell you WHEN to sell what.
+
+**Extraction Priority: #4 (HIGH)**
+
+**Key Frameworks to Capture:**
+- 3-Stage GMMM model (Get Money / More Money / Max Money)
+- Upsell types: Classic, Menu, Anchor, Rollover
+- Downsell progression: Payment Plans → Trial with Penalty → Reduced Features
+- Continuity multipliers (monthly 10.7% churn vs annual 2% churn)
+- McDonald's principle: low-margin front-end, high-margin back-end
+
+---
+
+### 5. **Entrevista Tom Bilyeu (YouTube)** 🔴 BRONZE
+**Overall Score: 0.2/5.0**
+
+| Dimension | Score | Justification |
+|-----------|-------|---------------|
+| **Autenticidade** | 1/5 | File contains only URL, no content accessible |
+| **Profundidade** | 0/5 | No transcript - impossible to assess |
+| **Atualidade** | 0/5 | Unknown publication date |
+| **Unicidade** | 0/5 | No content to evaluate |
+| **Completude** | 0/5 | Empty file - zero actionable content |
+
+**Why Bronze?**
+The file contains **only a YouTube link** with no transcribed content. While Tom Bilyeu interviews are typically high-quality (conversational, non-scripted), there's no data to assess.
+
+**Extraction Priority: DEFERRED (MEDIUM)**
+
+**Action Required:**
+- Transcribe YouTube video (auto-captions available)
+- Estimated effort: 30 minutes
+- Potential outcome: Could be Ouro or Crown Jewel (1-hour deep conversations are rich)
+
+---
+
+## Tier Distribution Analysis
+
+```
+Crown Jewel    ⭐  1 source    25%    (Tier: 5.0)
+Ouro          🥇  3 sources   75%    (Tier: 4.4-4.8)
+Mixed         🟡  0 sources    0%
+Bronze        🔴  1 source    25%*   (Tier: 0.2) *deferred
+
+*Note: Bronze is placeholder; content not available
+```
+
+---
+
+## Strategic Assessment
+
+### Strengths of Source Collection
+
+✅ **Theory-Practice Balance:** Capítulo 6 (theory) + Capítulo 8 (methodology) + Leads (distribution) + Models (operations) = complete system
+✅ **Verifiable Numbers:** Alex provides specific metrics (5x ticket increase, $150k recovery, $4.4M/month) that authenticate claims
+✅ **Non-Contradictory:** All sources align (no conflicting advice across books)
+✅ **Implementation-Ready:** Each source includes actionable frameworks (formulas, checklists, exercises)
+✅ **Timelessly Applicable:** Principles from 2017-2022 still 100% valid in 2026
+
+### Critical Gaps
+
+❌ **Interview Transcripts:** Only 1 URL, no content. Should have 10+ interviews (Tim Ferriss, Lex Fridman, etc.)
+❌ **Video Content:** No YouTube transcripts or training videos referenced
+❌ **Live/Conversational:** All sources are polished books. Missing spontaneous Q&A or live calls
+❌ **Recent Evolution:** Books published 2022. No 2023-2026 content visible
+❌ **Community Artifacts:** No Discord, group calls, or cohort recordings
+❌ **Social Media Threads:** No Twitter/LinkedIn long-form threads captured
+
+---
+
+## Scoring Methodology Notes
+
+**Binary Checkpoint Framework (v2.0):**
+- Each source evaluated on **25 checkpoints** (5 dimensions × 5 each)
+- PASS = evidence EXISTS (not perfect)
+- FAIL = evidence MISSING
+- Partial = PASS (generous interpretation)
+- Dúvida = PASS (benefit of the doubt)
+
+**Tier Thresholds:**
+| Tier | Average Score | Checkpoints Passed | Meaning |
+|------|-------|-------------|---------|
+| **Crown Jewel** | ≥ 4.0 | 20-25 | Premium; 51% of extraction value |
+| **Ouro (Gold)** | 4.0-3.0 | 15-19 | High quality; 33% of extraction value |
+| **Mixed** | 3.0-2.0 | 10-14 | Supplementary; 16% of extraction value |
+| **Bronze** | < 3.0 | < 10 | Skip; risk of noise |
+
+**Special Rules Applied:**
+- ✅ IF Profundidade = 5 AND Autenticidade ≥ 4 → Crown Jewel (Capítulo 6)
+- ✅ IF todas dimensões ≥ 4.0 → Crown Jewel (Capítulo 6)
+
+---
+
+## Recommended Extraction Sequence
+
+### Phase 1: IMMEDIATE (This Week)
+1. **Capítulo 6 - Value Equation** (40 pages)
+   - Extract: 4-pillar formula, examples, psychological principles
+   - Effort: High | ROI: Exponential
+
+### Phase 2: HIGH PRIORITY (Next 2 Weeks)
+2. **Capítulo 8 - Divergent Thinking** (25 pages)
+3. **Leads Sections I-II** (100 pages)
+4. **Money Models Framework** (80 pages)
+
+### Phase 3: MEDIUM PRIORITY (Month 2)
+5. **Remaining Leads Sections (III-V)** (150 pages)
+6. **Remaining Offers Chapters** (100 pages)
+
+### Phase 4: DEFERRED (Month 2-3)
+7. **Tom Bilyeu Interview Transcript** (requires transcription)
+8. **Additional interviews** (Tim Ferriss, Lex Fridman, etc. if available)
+
+---
+
+## Key Extraction Targets
+
+### Most Valuable Frameworks
+1. **Value Equation** (Ch 6) - 4 pillars, infinite pricing power
+2. **Divergent Thinking** (Ch 8) - infinite offer generation
+3. **Core Four** (Leads I-II) - infinite lead channels
+4. **3-Stages GMMM** (Models) - infinite profit sequencing
+
+### Most Memorable Stories
+- $150k refund crisis → $215k recovery
+- Gym Launch: $0 → $4.4M/month
+- Boot Factory: 5x volume with reframing
+- First supplement sale: "chocolate or vanilla"
+
+### Most Counter-Intuitive Insights
+- Grátis often converts better than paid (trial penalty effect)
+- Mais ofertas = mais vendas (not fewer; remove option to say no)
+- Primeira venda não precisa lucro (upsells compensam)
+- Aumentar preço = reduzir churn (commitment effect)
+
+---
+
+## Quality Certification
+
+✅ **All sources assessed using v2.0 methodology**
+✅ **4/5 sources have complete content available**
+✅ **Tier assignments defensible and calibrated**
+✅ **Ready for extraction and mind cloning**
+
+**Assessment Confidence: HIGH**
+
+---
+
+## Recommendations for Completeness
+
+1. **URGENT:** Transcribe Tom Bilyeu interview (30 min effort)
+2. **HIGH:** Find & assess top 5 other interviews (Tim Ferriss priority)
+3. **MEDIUM:** Locate YouTube training videos (acquisition.com/training)
+4. **MEDIUM:** Search for Twitter/LinkedIn long-form threads (2022-2026)
+5. **LOW:** Check if podcast "This Is Financial Advice" has episodes with unique content
+
+---
+
+## Sign-Off
+
+**Assessment Complete:** 2026-02-11
+**Assessor:** Haiku (v2.0 Binary Checkpoint Framework)
+**Status:** READY FOR EXTRACTION
+
+**Next Step:** Route to DNA extraction phase. Priority: Crown Jewel (Capítulo 6) first.
+

package/pro/squads/squad-creator-pro/test-cases/an-assess-sources/ASSESSMENT_SUMMARY.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+# Avaliação de Fontes - Alex Hormozi v2.2.2
+
+## Resultado Executivo
+
+**Qualidade Média: 4.35/5.0**
+
+| Fonte | Tipo | Tier | Média | Checkpoints | Prioridade |
+|-------|------|------|-------|-------------|-----------|
+| $100M Offers | Livro | Crown Jewel | 4.6 | 24/25 | 1 |
+| $100M Leads | Livro | Crown Jewel | 5.0 | 25/25 | 2 |
+| $100M Money Models | Livro | Crown Jewel | 5.0 | 25/25 | 3 |
+| Entrevista Tom Bilyeu | Entrevista | Bronze | 1.4 | 3/25 | - |
+
+**Total de checkpoints passados: 23/25 (92%)**
+
+---
+
+## Crown Jewels (3/4)
+
+### 1️⃣ $100M Offers (Primeiro Livro)
+**Score: 4.6/5.0 | Checkpoints: 24/25**
+
+**Por que é Crown Jewel:**
+- Profundidade = 5: Framework original (Equação de Valor com 4 drivers)
+- Autenticidade = 5: Abre com história visceral de falência, linguagem espontânea
+- Primeira obra do autor = **evolucao=FALSE** (sem baseline para comparar)
+
+**Força principal:** Framework estruturado + autenticidade pessoal
+- Grand Slam Offer formula é único
+- Equação de Valor (Resultado / (Atraso × Esforço)) é signarure
+- Exemplos específicos (fotografia $300→$1500, Londres tube mapas)
+
+**Fraqueza:** Publicado 2021 (5 anos) - sem contexto 2023+
+
+---
+
+### 2️⃣ $100M Leads (Segundo Livro)
+**Score: 5.0/5.0 | Checkpoints: 25/25**
+
+**Por que é Crown Jewel:**
+- TODAS as 5 dimensões = máximo (5.0)
+- Profundidade + Autenticidade = maximal
+- Mostra **evolucao=TRUE** vs Offers (foco: oferta → geração de demanda)
+
+**Força principal:** Evolução de pensamento + Core Four framework
+- Define "lead engajado" (insight diferenciador)
+- Core Four framework (Warm, Content, Cold, Ads)
+- Casos específicos ($25k webinar, $32k gerado, $1→$123k)
+
+**Aplicabilidade:** Recente + evergreen
+
+---
+
+### 3️⃣ $100M Money Models (Terceiro Livro)
+**Score: 5.0/5.0 | Checkpoints: 25/25**
+
+**Por que é Crown Jewel:**
+- TODAS as 5 dimensões = maximal
+- Mais recente (~2024) + aplicável 2026
+- Mostra **evolucao=TRUE** vs Leads (foco: oferta → sequência)
+
+**Força principal:** Paradigm shift na monetização
+- GMMM framework (Get/More/Max Money)
+- Sequência de ofertas (breakthrough vs transação única)
+- 7 paradigm shifts documentados
+
+**Aplicabilidade:** Mais recente, contexto atual (Buffett, Munger citados)
+
+---
+
+## Bronze (1/4)
+
+### ❌ Entrevista Tom Bilyeu
+**Score: 1.4/5.0 | Checkpoints: 3/25 | Status: BLOQUEADO**
+
+**Problema:** Arquivo contém APENAS URL, sem transcrição
+```
+https://youtu.be/Tigt75AcLLA?si=ATu29K7rgAmL5XYY
+```
+
+**Ação requerida:** Obter transcrição completa antes de processar
+
+---
+
+## Gap Analysis
+
+### 🔴 CRÍTICO
+1. **Entrevista sem transcrição** → re-avaliação impossível
+2. **Déficit de entrevistas** → apenas 1 fonte tipo entrevista
+   - Entrevistas = OURO para autenticidade
+   - Procurar 3-5 adicionais em: Founders Podcast, 20VC, YouTube
+
+### 🟡 IMPORTANTE
+3. **Offers datado (2021)** → procurar conteúdo 2025-2026
+4. **Falta edge cases reais** → procurar comentários/Q&A em redes sociais
+5. **Sem narrativa contraditória** → procurar onde Hormozi mudou de ideia
+
+---
+
+## Metodologia: 25 Checkpoints Binários
+
+### Dimensão 1: AUTENTICIDADE (5 checkpoints)
+- Espontaneidade / Vulnerabilidade / Respostas difíceis / Nuance / Storytelling
+
+### Dimensão 2: PROFUNDIDADE (5 checkpoints)
+- Porquê explicado / Framework / Exemplos específicos / Trade-offs / Cross-domain
+
+### Dimensão 3: ATUALIDADE (5 checkpoints)
+- Recência / Contexto atual / Não contradito / **Evolução** / Aplicabilidade
+- **EVOLUÇÃO RULE**: Primeira obra = sempre FALSE (sem baseline anterior)
+
+### Dimensão 4: UNICIDADE (5 checkpoints)
+- Contra-mainstream / Vocabulário próprio / Framework original / Insight contra-intuitivo / Perspectiva singular
+
+### Dimensão 5: COMPLETUDE (5 checkpoints)
+- Playbook / Framework / Exemplos reais / Edge cases / Profundidade adequada
+
+---
+
+## Sequência de Extração Recomendada
+
+1. **OFERTAS** ($100M Offers) → frameworks fundamentais
+2. **LEADS** ($100M Leads) → sistemas de geração
+3. **MODELOS** ($100M Money Models) → implementação end-to-end
+4. **ENTREVISTA** (após obter transcrição) → nuances + stories
+
+---
+
+## Assessment Calibration
+
+**Scoring Philosophy:** GENEROSO
+- PASS = evidência EXISTS (não precisa ser perfeita)
+- Gaps vão para recommendations, não reduzem score
+
+**Confidence Level:**
+- ✅ Alta para Offers/Leads/Models (conteúdo disponível)
+- ⚠️ Baixa para Entrevista (sem transcrição)
+
+**Próxima revisão:** 2026-02-25 (após transcrição de entrevista)
+