@playcraft/cli 0.0.43 → 0.0.46

package/project-template/templates/atom-plan.template.json

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "schemaVersion": 1,
-  "skillsMatch": {
-    "engine": "{{engine}}",
-    "engineSource": "inferred",
-    "intent": ["{{gameplayType}}", "{{mechanic}}", "{{keywords}}"],
-    "items": [],
-    "mediaGroups": []
-  },
-  "atoms": [
-    {
-      "atomId": "{{production_atom_id}}",
-      "slot": "{{slot_name}}",
-      "type": "GameplayAtom",
-      "assignTo": "Developer",
-      "dependsOn": [],
-      "skillRef": "{{aigameplay_atomId_or_null}}",
-      "priority": "high",
-      "parallelGroup": null,
-      "referenceSource": null,
-      "status": "pending",
-      "actualOutput": null
-    },
-    {
-      "atomId": "{{visual_atom_id}}",
-      "slot": "{{element_id_from_assetMapping}}",
-      "type": "VisualAtom",
-      "assignTo": "Designer",
-      "dependsOn": [],
-      "skillRef": null,
-      "priority": "normal",
-      "parallelGroup": null,
-      "referenceSource": null,
-      "asrSlot": {
-        "sheet": "element",
-        "row": 1,
-        "col": 1
-      },
-      "status": "pending",
-      "actualOutput": null
-    }
-  ],
-  "dagRevisions": []
-}

package/project-template/templates/atom-plan.template.md

@@ -1,108 +0,0 @@
-# Atom Plan — DAG Definition
-
-<!--
-  **Canonical DAG**: `docs/atom-plan.json` — skillsMatch + atoms[] + dagRevisions.
-  **This Markdown (Gate #1)**: Acceptance Criteria only + empty Context placeholders + DAG Revisions.
-  Do NOT mirror atoms[] here at Gate #1 — no Atom List table, no DAG Order (dependsOn lives in JSON).
-  Format: docs/team/atom-plan-format.md | PM workflow: refs/pm-workflow-detail.md § Step 8
--->
-
-> **Canonical**: [`docs/atom-plan.json`](atom-plan.json) — PM edits JSON; hook runs `validate-atom-plan` on STOP.
-
-> **Living Document**: Designer / TA / Developer enrich **their** sections below without overwriting PM's JSON.
-
-> **⚠️ Status Contract**: Every agent MUST update `atom-plan.json` → `atoms[].status` + `atoms[].actualOutput` upon completing each assigned atom. Atoms left at `pending` with `actualOutput: null` after delivery = workflow violation.
-
-## JSON 主文件（PM Gate #1）
-
-```bash
-playcraft skills match --intent "<gameplayType>,<mechanic>,<keywords>" --json   # → skillsMatch
-playcraft skills validate-atom-plan
-playcraft skills link --from-atom-plan --prune
-```
-
-- **Never** use `playcraft-*` in `skillRef`; values must come from `skillsMatch.items[].atomId` (or `null` + `dagRevisions` gap)
-
-## mediaGroups — Pre-Matched Reusable Assets
-
-> **`skillsMatch.mediaGroups`** lists assets from the skills library that match this project's needs. Downstream agents (Designer for audio, TA for images) **MUST check mediaGroups before generating from scratch**.
-
-**Usage protocol:**
-
-1. **Designer (audio)**: Read `mediaGroups` → any `.aiaudio` match? → `playcraft skills link --atom <atomId>` → post-process → mark `status: done`
-2. **TA (visual)**: Read `mediaGroups` → any `.aiimage` / `.aisprite` match? → `playcraft skills link --atom <atomId>` → post-process (resize/convert/transparency) → mark `status: done`
-3. **Skip only when**: quality/style/mood mismatch — document reason in `## DAG Revisions`
-
----
-
-## Acceptance Criteria
-
-| atomId      | Criteria                                                       |
-| ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |
-| {{atom_id}} | {{one short line — reference other docs, do not repeat specs}} |
-
-<!--
-Gate #1 — one line per atom in atoms[]; point elsewhere for details:
-  ✅ "tile_atlas: layout-spec § assetMapping tiles_atlas + frameId satisfied"
-  ✅ "match3_gameplay: first level 100% clearable per design-brief § Level Configuration"
-  ❌ WxH, hex, gradient prose, or paths already in layout-spec
--->
-
----
-
-## Asset Skill Context
-
-> **Designer fills** after Phase 1 Skill Discovery. **MUST NOT** leave empty after Phase 2 delivery.
-
-<!-- Designer: for each assigned atom, record:
-  - Which Skills you read and applied (playcraft-audio-generation, playcraft-text-rendering, etc.)
-  - Whether a mediaGroup match was used or skipped (with reason)
-  - Key generation parameters (model, prompt strategy, reference images)
--->
-
-(Pending Designer Phase 1)
-
----
-
-## TA Skill Context
-
-> **Technical Artist fills** during production Wave 2. **MUST NOT** leave empty after delivery.
-
-<!-- TA: for each assigned atom, record:
-  - Production approach (linked from mediaGroups / generated from scratch)
-  - Atom Skill recipe (if skillRef present): base prompt, model, variants
-  - Matched pipeline Skills: which playcraft-* skills were applied
-  - Pipeline decision: key choices made during production
--->
-
-(Pending Technical Artist Phase 1)
-
----
-
-## Impl Skill Context
-
-> **Developer fills** during integration Skill Preflight. **MUST NOT** leave empty after implementation.
-
-<!-- Developer: for each assigned atom, record:
-  - Implementation approach (based on SKILL.md Recipe)
-  - Matched Skills: which .aigameplay / .aiconfig skills were scaffolded
-  - ref files used: PGS schemas, reducer templates, etc.
-  - Implementation decisions: deviations from Skill template + reason
--->
-
-(Pending Developer Phase 1)
-
----
-
-## DAG Revisions
-
-> Record structural changes to `atom-plan.json` → `atoms[]`. Reviewer audits these.
-
-<!--
-### Revision {{N}} — {{Agent}} ({{add/remove/modify}})
-- **atomId**: {{atom_id}}
-- **reason**: {{why}}
-- **change**: {{what changed in JSON}}
--->
-
-(No revisions yet)