@jaimevalasek/aioson 1.8.0 → 1.9.0

package/template/.aioson/skills/references/premium-command-center-ui/operational-ux-playbook.md

@@ -1,253 +1,253 @@
-# Operational UX Playbook
-
-> This reference documents the UX logic extracted from the AIOS Dashboard implementation.
-> Use it when defining navigation, hierarchy, grouping, page composition, and interaction patterns.
-
----
-
-## 1. Core UX principle
-
-This system treats the product like an operating surface.
-
-That means:
-
-- the user should see current pressure first
-- the next useful action should be one click away
-- supporting history and metrics should stay available without taking over the page
-- the UI should guide the user through live state, not just display records
-
----
-
-## 2. Hierarchy rules extracted from the dashboard
-
-### Rule 1: runtime before infrastructure
-
-Operational signals must appear above:
-
-- paths
-- configuration
-- administrative utilities
-- long explanatory blocks
-
-This was applied directly in the dashboard: runtime, agents, tasks, workflows, and memory lanes moved above lower-priority infrastructure.
-
-### Rule 2: one dominant section per screen
-
-Each premium route has one primary working area:
-
-- overview: runtime pulse
-- tasks: control tower
-- workflows: execution topology + catalog
-- memories: memory model + fresh assets
-
-Everything else is secondary support.
-
-### Rule 3: grouped meaning beats flat listing
-
-Do not show long ungrouped lists when the records can be grouped by origin, momentum, layer, or domain.
-
-Real examples from the implementation:
-
-- agents split into official vs squad agents
-- squad agents grouped by squad
-- workflows represented as lanes per squad
-- memories grouped into foundation / generated / capabilities
-
----
-
-## 3. Navigation pattern
-
-The navigation stack has three layers:
-
-### Left rail
-
-Permanent product modules and project switching.
-
-Use it for:
-
-- top-level routes
-- project/workspace selector
-- persistent product identity
-
-### Top search bar
-
-This is a search-first control strip.
-
-Include:
-
-- command palette entry point
-- active route label
-- active project chip
-- system utility such as theme toggle or live status chip
-
-### Right activity rail
-
-Keep contextual panels visible on desktop.
-
-The shipped pattern uses three tabs:
-
-- `Status`
-- `History`
-- `Metrics`
-
-This is important: the right rail should never be decorative. It must summarize the current route context and provide quick drill-downs.
-
----
-
-## 4. Search-first interaction
-
-The premium feel improved because navigation stopped depending only on the left rail.
-
-Required behaviors:
-
-- command palette open via `Ctrl/Cmd + K`
-- close via `Esc`
-- immediate focus on the search field
-- searchable items drawn from real routes and project context
-- result items should be clickable cards, not plain text rows
-
-If a dashboard has many modules and no fast command surface, it will feel slower than it looks.
-
----
-
-## 5. Page archetypes extracted from the implementation
-
-### A. Command center overview
-
-Use when the user needs a system pulse before drilling deeper.
-
-Composition:
-
-- metrics row
-- runtime pulse block
-- project snapshot
-- momentum boards for workflows, queue, memory
-
-### B. Queue / control tower
-
-Use when a route is primarily about active work items.
-
-Composition:
-
-- metrics row
-- left column: load mix + active queue
-- right column: backlog / recent history
-- bottom: grouped load map or concentration map
-
-### C. Workflow catalog
-
-Use when a route represents grouped execution lanes or modules.
-
-Composition:
-
-- metrics row
-- left: capacity topology / featured lanes
-- right: dense lane catalog
-
-### D. Knowledge explorer
-
-Use when surfacing memory, assets, documents, or learned context.
-
-Composition:
-
-- metrics row
-- model explanation or layer summary
-- recent asset stream
-- grouped knowledge columns
-
-### E. Grouped registry
-
-Use when a route is still index-like but should not feel flat.
-
-Composition:
-
-- metrics row
-- registry header
-- segmented groups with direct actions inside each group
-
----
-
-## 6. Data modeling for premium UX
-
-A key implementation pattern was to build UI-specific records instead of binding components directly to raw data.
-
-Reuse this pattern in new projects:
-
-- create aggregated task records that already know their group, counts, and latest signal
-- create workflow records that already know momentum and capability volume
-- create memory or asset records that already know scope, kind, and source
-
-This lets the UI stay concise and intentional.
-
----
-
-## 7. Interaction patterns to preserve
-
-### Project switcher
-
-- collapsible panel in the left rail
-- active project clearly highlighted
-- switching should preserve current route when possible
-
-### State tabs
-
-- use compact segmented controls for status / history / metrics
-- active state gets a premium fill, not just bold text
-
-### Direct action cards
-
-- every major card should offer the next drill-down
-- do not force the user to navigate back to the left rail for everything
-
-### Empty states
-
-- use styled empty states with dashed border and an orientation sentence
-- explain what will populate this area and where the user should go next
-
-### Theme toggle
-
-- small persistent utility
-- should feel integrated, not like a floating widget
-
----
-
-## 8. Responsive playbook
-
-The responsive strategy is progressive collapse, not redesign.
-
-- keep the same route structure on mobile/tablet
-- hide the right rail below desktop
-- stack split sections vertically
-- let chips and actions wrap naturally
-- keep titles, helper text, and action labels short enough to survive narrower widths
-
-Avoid shipping a dense desktop layout with no collapse strategy.
-
----
-
-## 9. Anti-patterns extracted from what was improved
-
-Avoid these regressions:
-
-- placing paths, IDs, and infrastructure blocks above runtime-critical information
-- leaving all cards with the same visual weight and no focal block
-- separating related items into different screens when grouped cards would work better
-- over-expanding padding and gaps until the dashboard feels empty
-- making the premium layer only visual, with no navigation or interaction upgrade
-- using status colors as decoration rather than meaning
-- rendering every route as the same metric-row-plus-card-grid template without adapting to the job of the page
-
----
-
-## 10. What creates the premium feel in UX terms
-
-The premium effect is the combination of:
-
-- a productized shell
-- faster route entry through search
-- contextual side information always available
-- clear operational hierarchy
-- grouped drill-downs that match how the user thinks
-- reduced friction between reading and acting
-
-If the UI looks expensive but still feels slow to operate, the premium bar was missed.
+# Operational UX Playbook
+
+> This reference documents the UX logic extracted from the AIOS Dashboard implementation.
+> Use it when defining navigation, hierarchy, grouping, page composition, and interaction patterns.
+
+---
+
+## 1. Core UX principle
+
+This system treats the product like an operating surface.
+
+That means:
+
+- the user should see current pressure first
+- the next useful action should be one click away
+- supporting history and metrics should stay available without taking over the page
+- the UI should guide the user through live state, not just display records
+
+---
+
+## 2. Hierarchy rules extracted from the dashboard
+
+### Rule 1: runtime before infrastructure
+
+Operational signals must appear above:
+
+- paths
+- configuration
+- administrative utilities
+- long explanatory blocks
+
+This was applied directly in the dashboard: runtime, agents, tasks, workflows, and memory lanes moved above lower-priority infrastructure.
+
+### Rule 2: one dominant section per screen
+
+Each premium route has one primary working area:
+
+- overview: runtime pulse
+- tasks: control tower
+- workflows: execution topology + catalog
+- memories: memory model + fresh assets
+
+Everything else is secondary support.
+
+### Rule 3: grouped meaning beats flat listing
+
+Do not show long ungrouped lists when the records can be grouped by origin, momentum, layer, or domain.
+
+Real examples from the implementation:
+
+- agents split into official vs squad agents
+- squad agents grouped by squad
+- workflows represented as lanes per squad
+- memories grouped into foundation / generated / capabilities
+
+---
+
+## 3. Navigation pattern
+
+The navigation stack has three layers:
+
+### Left rail
+
+Permanent product modules and project switching.
+
+Use it for:
+
+- top-level routes
+- project/workspace selector
+- persistent product identity
+
+### Top search bar
+
+This is a search-first control strip.
+
+Include:
+
+- command palette entry point
+- active route label
+- active project chip
+- system utility such as theme toggle or live status chip
+
+### Right activity rail
+
+Keep contextual panels visible on desktop.
+
+The shipped pattern uses three tabs:
+
+- `Status`
+- `History`
+- `Metrics`
+
+This is important: the right rail should never be decorative. It must summarize the current route context and provide quick drill-downs.
+
+---
+
+## 4. Search-first interaction
+
+The premium feel improved because navigation stopped depending only on the left rail.
+
+Required behaviors:
+
+- command palette open via `Ctrl/Cmd + K`
+- close via `Esc`
+- immediate focus on the search field
+- searchable items drawn from real routes and project context
+- result items should be clickable cards, not plain text rows
+
+If a dashboard has many modules and no fast command surface, it will feel slower than it looks.
+
+---
+
+## 5. Page archetypes extracted from the implementation
+
+### A. Command center overview
+
+Use when the user needs a system pulse before drilling deeper.
+
+Composition:
+
+- metrics row
+- runtime pulse block
+- project snapshot
+- momentum boards for workflows, queue, memory
+
+### B. Queue / control tower
+
+Use when a route is primarily about active work items.
+
+Composition:
+
+- metrics row
+- left column: load mix + active queue
+- right column: backlog / recent history
+- bottom: grouped load map or concentration map
+
+### C. Workflow catalog
+
+Use when a route represents grouped execution lanes or modules.
+
+Composition:
+
+- metrics row
+- left: capacity topology / featured lanes
+- right: dense lane catalog
+
+### D. Knowledge explorer
+
+Use when surfacing memory, assets, documents, or learned context.
+
+Composition:
+
+- metrics row
+- model explanation or layer summary
+- recent asset stream
+- grouped knowledge columns
+
+### E. Grouped registry
+
+Use when a route is still index-like but should not feel flat.
+
+Composition:
+
+- metrics row
+- registry header
+- segmented groups with direct actions inside each group
+
+---
+
+## 6. Data modeling for premium UX
+
+A key implementation pattern was to build UI-specific records instead of binding components directly to raw data.
+
+Reuse this pattern in new projects:
+
+- create aggregated task records that already know their group, counts, and latest signal
+- create workflow records that already know momentum and capability volume
+- create memory or asset records that already know scope, kind, and source
+
+This lets the UI stay concise and intentional.
+
+---
+
+## 7. Interaction patterns to preserve
+
+### Project switcher
+
+- collapsible panel in the left rail
+- active project clearly highlighted
+- switching should preserve current route when possible
+
+### State tabs
+
+- use compact segmented controls for status / history / metrics
+- active state gets a premium fill, not just bold text
+
+### Direct action cards
+
+- every major card should offer the next drill-down
+- do not force the user to navigate back to the left rail for everything
+
+### Empty states
+
+- use styled empty states with dashed border and an orientation sentence
+- explain what will populate this area and where the user should go next
+
+### Theme toggle
+
+- small persistent utility
+- should feel integrated, not like a floating widget
+
+---
+
+## 8. Responsive playbook
+
+The responsive strategy is progressive collapse, not redesign.
+
+- keep the same route structure on mobile/tablet
+- hide the right rail below desktop
+- stack split sections vertically
+- let chips and actions wrap naturally
+- keep titles, helper text, and action labels short enough to survive narrower widths
+
+Avoid shipping a dense desktop layout with no collapse strategy.
+
+---
+
+## 9. Anti-patterns extracted from what was improved
+
+Avoid these regressions:
+
+- placing paths, IDs, and infrastructure blocks above runtime-critical information
+- leaving all cards with the same visual weight and no focal block
+- separating related items into different screens when grouped cards would work better
+- over-expanding padding and gaps until the dashboard feels empty
+- making the premium layer only visual, with no navigation or interaction upgrade
+- using status colors as decoration rather than meaning
+- rendering every route as the same metric-row-plus-card-grid template without adapting to the job of the page
+
+---
+
+## 10. What creates the premium feel in UX terms
+
+The premium effect is the combination of:
+
+- a productized shell
+- faster route entry through search
+- contextual side information always available
+- clear operational hierarchy
+- grouped drill-downs that match how the user thinks
+- reduced friction between reading and acting
+
+If the UI looks expensive but still feels slow to operate, the premium bar was missed.

package/template/.aioson/skills/references/premium-command-center-ui/quality-validation-checklist.md

@@ -1,82 +1,82 @@
-# Quality Validation Checklist
-
-> Run this before shipping any UI that claims to follow `premium-command-center-ui`.
-
----
-
-## A. Visual system
-
-- [ ] The page uses a clear premium direction, not a default dark theme.
-- [ ] There are no more than 3 major surface levels.
-- [ ] Borders are visible and consistent across major panels.
-- [ ] Shadows belong to one family only.
-- [ ] Semantic colors are limited to clear roles (`accent`, `success`, `warning`, `danger`, `violet`, `neutral`).
-- [ ] The background atmosphere is intentional and restrained.
-
-## B. Typography and density
-
-- [ ] Eyebrows, headings, helper text, and monospace metadata follow a consistent hierarchy.
-- [ ] Titles use stronger weight and tighter tracking than body copy.
-- [ ] Density feels compact and operational, not empty and oversized.
-- [ ] Repeated paddings, radii, and gaps follow one compact scale.
-
-## C. Layout and hierarchy
-
-- [ ] The primary operational signal is above infrastructure and secondary metadata.
-- [ ] Each page has one obvious focal block.
-- [ ] The route composition matches its job (overview, queue, catalog, explorer, registry).
-- [ ] Long flat lists were replaced by grouped or segmented structures where appropriate.
-- [ ] Important counts or statuses are visible without scrolling deep into the page.
-
-## D. Shell and navigation
-
-- [ ] The shell feels like a product operating surface, not just page chrome.
-- [ ] Left navigation exposes real first-class modules only.
-- [ ] Top search or command access exists when route count or complexity justifies it.
-- [ ] Contextual status/history/metrics are available somewhere persistent when needed.
-- [ ] Cards or grouped rows expose direct drill-down actions.
-
-## E. Component quality
-
-- [ ] Major cards have clear default and hover states.
-- [ ] Active or selected states are visually distinct.
-- [ ] Empty states are intentionally designed, not plain paragraphs.
-- [ ] Error and warning surfaces use the semantic tone system.
-- [ ] Utility controls (toggle, tabs, segmented filters, search triggers) feel integrated into the shell.
-
-## F. Responsiveness
-
-- [ ] The desktop shell collapses progressively instead of breaking.
-- [ ] Split sections stack cleanly below large breakpoints.
-- [ ] Action rows and chips wrap safely.
-- [ ] No critical context disappears without an alternate access path.
-- [ ] Text labels remain legible and do not overflow in common viewport widths.
-
-## G. Accessibility
-
-- [ ] Interactive elements remain keyboard reachable.
-- [ ] Focus states are visible.
-- [ ] Body text contrast is comfortable for long reading.
-- [ ] Meaning is not conveyed by color alone.
-- [ ] Modals, overlays, and drawers have obvious close behavior.
-
-## H. Premium feel audit
-
-- [ ] The interface feels faster to use, not only more decorated.
-- [ ] The shell, search, context rail, and grouped cards work together as one system.
-- [ ] The result does not look like a generic template from a dashboard kit.
-- [ ] The visual identity would still be recognizable if labels changed.
-- [ ] The user can tell where to act next on every important screen.
-
----
-
-## Hard fail conditions
-
-If any of these are true, the skill was not applied correctly:
-
-- the page is just a dark background with default cards
-- every section has the same weight and the same composition
-- runtime-critical areas are buried below paths, config, or explanatory prose
-- the UI is still washed out or low-contrast
-- the interface feels spacious but not useful
-- navigation improved visually but not operationally
+# Quality Validation Checklist
+
+> Run this before shipping any UI that claims to follow `premium-command-center-ui`.
+
+---
+
+## A. Visual system
+
+- [ ] The page uses a clear premium direction, not a default dark theme.
+- [ ] There are no more than 3 major surface levels.
+- [ ] Borders are visible and consistent across major panels.
+- [ ] Shadows belong to one family only.
+- [ ] Semantic colors are limited to clear roles (`accent`, `success`, `warning`, `danger`, `violet`, `neutral`).
+- [ ] The background atmosphere is intentional and restrained.
+
+## B. Typography and density
+
+- [ ] Eyebrows, headings, helper text, and monospace metadata follow a consistent hierarchy.
+- [ ] Titles use stronger weight and tighter tracking than body copy.
+- [ ] Density feels compact and operational, not empty and oversized.
+- [ ] Repeated paddings, radii, and gaps follow one compact scale.
+
+## C. Layout and hierarchy
+
+- [ ] The primary operational signal is above infrastructure and secondary metadata.
+- [ ] Each page has one obvious focal block.
+- [ ] The route composition matches its job (overview, queue, catalog, explorer, registry).
+- [ ] Long flat lists were replaced by grouped or segmented structures where appropriate.
+- [ ] Important counts or statuses are visible without scrolling deep into the page.
+
+## D. Shell and navigation
+
+- [ ] The shell feels like a product operating surface, not just page chrome.
+- [ ] Left navigation exposes real first-class modules only.
+- [ ] Top search or command access exists when route count or complexity justifies it.
+- [ ] Contextual status/history/metrics are available somewhere persistent when needed.
+- [ ] Cards or grouped rows expose direct drill-down actions.
+
+## E. Component quality
+
+- [ ] Major cards have clear default and hover states.
+- [ ] Active or selected states are visually distinct.
+- [ ] Empty states are intentionally designed, not plain paragraphs.
+- [ ] Error and warning surfaces use the semantic tone system.
+- [ ] Utility controls (toggle, tabs, segmented filters, search triggers) feel integrated into the shell.
+
+## F. Responsiveness
+
+- [ ] The desktop shell collapses progressively instead of breaking.
+- [ ] Split sections stack cleanly below large breakpoints.
+- [ ] Action rows and chips wrap safely.
+- [ ] No critical context disappears without an alternate access path.
+- [ ] Text labels remain legible and do not overflow in common viewport widths.
+
+## G. Accessibility
+
+- [ ] Interactive elements remain keyboard reachable.
+- [ ] Focus states are visible.
+- [ ] Body text contrast is comfortable for long reading.
+- [ ] Meaning is not conveyed by color alone.
+- [ ] Modals, overlays, and drawers have obvious close behavior.
+
+## H. Premium feel audit
+
+- [ ] The interface feels faster to use, not only more decorated.
+- [ ] The shell, search, context rail, and grouped cards work together as one system.
+- [ ] The result does not look like a generic template from a dashboard kit.
+- [ ] The visual identity would still be recognizable if labels changed.
+- [ ] The user can tell where to act next on every important screen.
+
+---
+
+## Hard fail conditions
+
+If any of these are true, the skill was not applied correctly:
+
+- the page is just a dark background with default cards
+- every section has the same weight and the same composition
+- runtime-critical areas are buried below paths, config, or explanatory prose
+- the UI is still washed out or low-contrast
+- the interface feels spacious but not useful
+- navigation improved visually but not operationally