@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli.js +1 -1
- package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/index.d.ts +62 -0
- package/dist/core/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/index.js +137 -0
- package/dist/core/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +11 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts +7 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.js +216 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +30 -10
- package/templates/core/01_prd.md +465 -0
- package/templates/core/02_adr.md +432 -0
- package/templates/core/03_generate_tasks.md +418 -0
- package/templates/core/04_process_task_list.md +430 -0
- package/templates/core/05_market_research.md +483 -0
- package/templates/core/06_architecture.md +561 -0
- package/templates/core/07_competitor_analysis.md +462 -0
- package/templates/core/08_personas.md +367 -0
- package/templates/core/09_user_journeys.md +385 -0
- package/templates/core/10_user_stories.md +582 -0
- package/templates/core/11_acceptance_criteria.md +687 -0
- package/templates/core/12_qa_gate.md +737 -0
- package/templates/core/13_risk_register.md +605 -0
- package/templates/core/14_project_brief.md +477 -0
- package/templates/core/15_brainstorming.md +653 -0
- package/templates/core/16_frontend_spec.md +1479 -0
- package/templates/core/17_test_plan.md +878 -0
- package/templates/core/18_release_plan.md +994 -0
- package/templates/core/19_operational_readiness.md +1100 -0
- package/templates/core/20_metrics_dashboard.md +1375 -0
- package/templates/core/21_postmortem.md +1122 -0
- package/templates/core/22_playtest_usability.md +1624 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 👥 User Personas & Target Audience Analysis
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Metadata**
|
|
4
|
+
- Last Updated: {{DATE}}
|
|
5
|
+
- Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
> **🎯 Purpose**
|
|
8
|
+
> Detailed user persona profiles based on research and data to guide product development, marketing strategies, and user experience design. These personas represent real user segments with specific needs, behaviors, and characteristics.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
---
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## 🎭 Primary Persona: Enterprise Decision Maker
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### 📊 Demographics & Profile
|
|
15
|
+
**Name:** Sarah Chen - Chief Technology Officer
|
|
16
|
+
**Age:** 42
|
|
17
|
+
**Location:** San Francisco Bay Area
|
|
18
|
+
**Education:** MS Computer Science, MBA
|
|
19
|
+
**Company:** Mid-size technology company (500-2000 employees)
|
|
20
|
+
**Industry:** SaaS, FinTech, HealthTech
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
### 💼 Professional Context
|
|
23
|
+
**Role & Responsibilities:**
|
|
24
|
+
- Technology strategy and architecture decisions
|
|
25
|
+
- Team management (50+ engineers across 5 teams)
|
|
26
|
+
- Budget authority ($5M+ annual technology spend)
|
|
27
|
+
- Vendor evaluation and procurement oversight
|
|
28
|
+
- Digital transformation initiatives
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
**Reporting Structure:**
|
|
31
|
+
- Reports to: CEO
|
|
32
|
+
- Direct Reports: VP Engineering, VP Data, Security Director
|
|
33
|
+
- Cross-functional: Works closely with Product, Sales, Marketing
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
**Key Performance Metrics:**
|
|
36
|
+
- System uptime and reliability (99.9% SLA)
|
|
37
|
+
- Development velocity and time-to-market
|
|
38
|
+
- Technology ROI and cost optimization
|
|
39
|
+
- Security and compliance adherence
|
|
40
|
+
- Team productivity and satisfaction
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### 🎯 Goals & Motivations
|
|
43
|
+
**Primary Goals:**
|
|
44
|
+
1. **Modernize Technology Stack** - Replace legacy systems with scalable solutions
|
|
45
|
+
2. **Improve Development Velocity** - Enable faster feature delivery
|
|
46
|
+
3. **Ensure Security & Compliance** - Meet SOC 2, GDPR requirements
|
|
47
|
+
4. **Optimize Costs** - Reduce total cost of ownership by 20%
|
|
48
|
+
5. **Attract Top Talent** - Build reputation as innovative technology organization
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
51
|
+
- Faster deployment cycles (weekly vs. monthly)
|
|
52
|
+
- Reduced infrastructure costs
|
|
53
|
+
- Improved developer experience scores
|
|
54
|
+
- Zero security incidents
|
|
55
|
+
- Industry recognition and awards
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
### 😤 Pain Points & Frustrations
|
|
58
|
+
**Current Challenges:**
|
|
59
|
+
1. **Legacy System Complexity** - 10+ year old monolithic architecture
|
|
60
|
+
2. **Vendor Lock-in** - Difficult and expensive to switch providers
|
|
61
|
+
3. **Implementation Delays** - 6-12 month deployment cycles
|
|
62
|
+
4. **Hidden Costs** - Unpredictable pricing and professional services fees
|
|
63
|
+
5. **Poor User Experience** - Complex interfaces requiring extensive training
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**Daily Frustrations:**
|
|
66
|
+
- Waiting for vendor support responses
|
|
67
|
+
- Explaining technology decisions to non-technical executives
|
|
68
|
+
- Managing multiple vendor relationships
|
|
69
|
+
- Dealing with system downtime and performance issues
|
|
70
|
+
- Coordinating between development teams and external vendors
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### 🛠️ Technology Environment
|
|
73
|
+
**Current Tools & Systems:**
|
|
74
|
+
- Cloud Infrastructure: AWS (primary), some Azure
|
|
75
|
+
- Development: GitHub, Jenkins, Docker
|
|
76
|
+
- Monitoring: New Relic, PagerDuty
|
|
77
|
+
- Communication: Slack, Zoom
|
|
78
|
+
- Enterprise Software: Salesforce, Workday, Confluence
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**Technology Preferences:**
|
|
81
|
+
- Cloud-native solutions over on-premise
|
|
82
|
+
- API-first architecture for integrations
|
|
83
|
+
- Self-service capabilities for teams
|
|
84
|
+
- Transparent pricing models
|
|
85
|
+
- Strong security and compliance features
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
### 💰 Buying Behavior & Decision Process
|
|
88
|
+
**Budget Authority:** $500K+ individual decisions, $1M+ with board approval
|
|
89
|
+
**Decision Timeline:** 3-6 months for major platform decisions
|
|
90
|
+
**Evaluation Process:**
|
|
91
|
+
1. **Problem Identification** (Month 1)
|
|
92
|
+
2. **Vendor Research & RFP** (Month 2-3)
|
|
93
|
+
3. **Proof of Concept** (Month 4)
|
|
94
|
+
4. **Stakeholder Alignment** (Month 5)
|
|
95
|
+
5. **Contract Negotiation** (Month 6)
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Key Decision Criteria:**
|
|
98
|
+
- Technical fit and architecture alignment (30%)
|
|
99
|
+
- Total cost of ownership (25%)
|
|
100
|
+
- Implementation timeline and risk (20%)
|
|
101
|
+
- Vendor stability and roadmap (15%)
|
|
102
|
+
- Reference customers and case studies (10%)
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
**Stakeholders Involved:**
|
|
105
|
+
- Primary Influencer: VP Engineering (technical evaluation)
|
|
106
|
+
- Economic Buyer: CFO (budget approval)
|
|
107
|
+
- End Users: Development teams (usability feedback)
|
|
108
|
+
- Compliance: Security/Legal teams (risk assessment)
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
### 📱 Information Sources & Channels
|
|
111
|
+
**Research Channels:**
|
|
112
|
+
- Industry conferences (AWS re:Invent, Strata, O'Reilly)
|
|
113
|
+
- Peer networks and CTO groups
|
|
114
|
+
- Industry analyst reports (Gartner, Forrester)
|
|
115
|
+
- Technical publications (InfoQ, IEEE)
|
|
116
|
+
- Vendor webinars and demos
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**Preferred Communication:**
|
|
119
|
+
- Email for detailed information and documentation
|
|
120
|
+
- Video calls for demos and technical discussions
|
|
121
|
+
- LinkedIn for industry insights and connections
|
|
122
|
+
- Technical blogs and whitepapers
|
|
123
|
+
- Executive briefings and strategy sessions
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
### 🎨 User Experience Preferences
|
|
126
|
+
**Interface Preferences:**
|
|
127
|
+
- Clean, modern design with minimal clutter
|
|
128
|
+
- Dashboard-style overview with drill-down capabilities
|
|
129
|
+
- Mobile-responsive for on-the-go access
|
|
130
|
+
- Customizable views for different stakeholders
|
|
131
|
+
- Strong data visualization and reporting
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
**Support Expectations:**
|
|
134
|
+
- 24/7 technical support for critical issues
|
|
135
|
+
- Dedicated customer success manager
|
|
136
|
+
- Regular business reviews and strategic planning
|
|
137
|
+
- Access to product roadmap and beta features
|
|
138
|
+
- Training and certification programs
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
---
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
## 🧑💻 Secondary Persona: Engineering Manager
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
### 📊 Demographics & Profile
|
|
145
|
+
**Name:** Marcus Rodriguez - VP of Engineering
|
|
146
|
+
**Age:** 38
|
|
147
|
+
**Location:** Austin, Texas
|
|
148
|
+
**Education:** BS Computer Science, MS Software Engineering
|
|
149
|
+
**Company:** Growing startup (100-500 employees)
|
|
150
|
+
**Industry:** E-commerce, Media, Gaming
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
### 💼 Professional Context
|
|
153
|
+
**Role & Responsibilities:**
|
|
154
|
+
- Lead engineering team of 20-30 developers
|
|
155
|
+
- Technical architecture and implementation decisions
|
|
156
|
+
- Development process optimization
|
|
157
|
+
- Product delivery and quality assurance
|
|
158
|
+
- Team hiring and professional development
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
**Daily Activities:**
|
|
161
|
+
- Code reviews and technical guidance
|
|
162
|
+
- Sprint planning and backlog management
|
|
163
|
+
- Cross-functional meetings with Product and Design
|
|
164
|
+
- Vendor evaluation and tool selection
|
|
165
|
+
- Team mentoring and performance reviews
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
### 🎯 Goals & Pain Points
|
|
168
|
+
**Primary Goals:**
|
|
169
|
+
- Increase development velocity by 50%
|
|
170
|
+
- Improve code quality and reduce bugs
|
|
171
|
+
- Build scalable systems for rapid growth
|
|
172
|
+
- Enhance developer experience and productivity
|
|
173
|
+
- Establish engineering best practices
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
**Major Pain Points:**
|
|
176
|
+
- Manual deployment processes slow down releases
|
|
177
|
+
- Debugging distributed systems is time-consuming
|
|
178
|
+
- Lack of visibility into system performance
|
|
179
|
+
- Difficult to onboard new team members
|
|
180
|
+
- Too much time spent on operations vs. features
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
### 🛠️ Technical Requirements
|
|
183
|
+
**Must-Have Features:**
|
|
184
|
+
- RESTful APIs with comprehensive documentation
|
|
185
|
+
- Real-time monitoring and alerting
|
|
186
|
+
- Automated testing and deployment pipelines
|
|
187
|
+
- Developer-friendly SDKs and tools
|
|
188
|
+
- Detailed audit logs and analytics
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
**Integration Needs:**
|
|
191
|
+
- GitHub/GitLab for source control
|
|
192
|
+
- Slack for team communication
|
|
193
|
+
- JIRA for project management
|
|
194
|
+
- Monitoring tools (DataDog, New Relic)
|
|
195
|
+
- Cloud platforms (AWS, GCP, Azure)
|
|
196
|
+
|
|
197
|
+
### 💰 Budget & Decision Influence
|
|
198
|
+
**Budget Influence:** Recommends tools up to $50K annually
|
|
199
|
+
**Decision Role:** Primary technical evaluator and influencer
|
|
200
|
+
**Evaluation Criteria:**
|
|
201
|
+
- Technical capabilities and API quality
|
|
202
|
+
- Developer experience and ease of use
|
|
203
|
+
- Documentation and community support
|
|
204
|
+
- Pricing transparency and scalability
|
|
205
|
+
- Integration ecosystem
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
---
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
## 👨💼 Tertiary Persona: Business Operations Manager
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
### 📊 Demographics & Profile
|
|
212
|
+
**Name:** Jennifer Kim - Director of Business Operations
|
|
213
|
+
**Age:** 35
|
|
214
|
+
**Location:** Seattle, Washington
|
|
215
|
+
**Education:** MBA, BS Business Administration
|
|
216
|
+
**Company:** Mid-market services company (200-1000 employees)
|
|
217
|
+
**Industry:** Professional Services, Consulting, Agency
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
### 💼 Professional Context
|
|
220
|
+
**Role & Responsibilities:**
|
|
221
|
+
- Business process optimization and automation
|
|
222
|
+
- Cross-departmental workflow coordination
|
|
223
|
+
- Vendor management and procurement
|
|
224
|
+
- Data analysis and business intelligence
|
|
225
|
+
- Change management and training
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
227
|
+
### 🎯 Goals & Pain Points
|
|
228
|
+
**Primary Goals:**
|
|
229
|
+
- Streamline operations and reduce manual work
|
|
230
|
+
- Improve data visibility and reporting
|
|
231
|
+
- Ensure compliance with industry regulations
|
|
232
|
+
- Reduce operational costs by 15%
|
|
233
|
+
- Enable business scaling without proportional headcount
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
**Major Pain Points:**
|
|
236
|
+
- Disconnected systems requiring manual data entry
|
|
237
|
+
- Limited visibility into cross-departmental processes
|
|
238
|
+
- Difficulty generating comprehensive reports
|
|
239
|
+
- Resistance to change from team members
|
|
240
|
+
- Vendor coordination and communication challenges
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
### 🛠️ Feature Requirements
|
|
243
|
+
**Essential Capabilities:**
|
|
244
|
+
- Workflow automation and business rules
|
|
245
|
+
- Custom reporting and dashboard creation
|
|
246
|
+
- User permission management and access controls
|
|
247
|
+
- Integration with existing business systems
|
|
248
|
+
- Mobile access for remote team members
|
|
249
|
+
|
|
250
|
+
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
251
|
+
- Reduced manual processing time
|
|
252
|
+
- Improved data accuracy and consistency
|
|
253
|
+
- Faster report generation
|
|
254
|
+
- Higher user adoption rates
|
|
255
|
+
- Measurable cost savings
|
|
256
|
+
|
|
257
|
+
---
|
|
258
|
+
|
|
259
|
+
## 🚫 Anti-Persona: DIY Technical Hobbyist
|
|
260
|
+
|
|
261
|
+
### 📊 Profile
|
|
262
|
+
**Name:** Alex Thompson - Solo Developer/Freelancer
|
|
263
|
+
**Characteristics:**
|
|
264
|
+
- Prefers building custom solutions over buying
|
|
265
|
+
- Price-sensitive with limited budget (<$100/month)
|
|
266
|
+
- Technical expertise but limited time
|
|
267
|
+
- Values complete control over implementation
|
|
268
|
+
- Works primarily on personal projects
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
### ❌ Why Not Our Target
|
|
271
|
+
**Misaligned Needs:**
|
|
272
|
+
- Wants free or very low-cost solutions
|
|
273
|
+
- Prefers open-source alternatives
|
|
274
|
+
- Limited scaling requirements
|
|
275
|
+
- Enjoys the technical challenge of building
|
|
276
|
+
- No enterprise compliance needs
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
**Resource Constraints:**
|
|
279
|
+
- Cannot afford professional support
|
|
280
|
+
- Limited time for vendor relationships
|
|
281
|
+
- No procurement process or budget approval
|
|
282
|
+
- Doesn't value business-focused features
|
|
283
|
+
- Prefers technical documentation over business value
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
---
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
## 📊 Persona Validation & Research
|
|
288
|
+
|
|
289
|
+
### 🔍 Research Methodology
|
|
290
|
+
**Data Sources:**
|
|
291
|
+
- Customer interviews (50+ interviews across segments)
|
|
292
|
+
- User analytics and behavior data
|
|
293
|
+
- Customer support ticket analysis
|
|
294
|
+
- Sales conversation recordings
|
|
295
|
+
- Survey responses (1,000+ respondents)
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
**Validation Techniques:**
|
|
298
|
+
- A/B testing different messaging approaches
|
|
299
|
+
- Customer journey mapping exercises
|
|
300
|
+
- Win/loss interview analysis
|
|
301
|
+
- Product usage pattern analysis
|
|
302
|
+
- Support escalation pattern review
|
|
303
|
+
|
|
304
|
+
### 📈 Persona Distribution
|
|
305
|
+
**Market Segment Breakdown:**
|
|
306
|
+
- Enterprise Decision Makers: 40% of revenue, 15% of users
|
|
307
|
+
- Engineering Managers: 35% of revenue, 25% of users
|
|
308
|
+
- Business Operations: 20% of revenue, 45% of users
|
|
309
|
+
- Other Segments: 5% of revenue, 15% of users
|
|
310
|
+
|
|
311
|
+
**Geographic Distribution:**
|
|
312
|
+
- North America: 60%
|
|
313
|
+
- Europe: 25%
|
|
314
|
+
- Asia-Pacific: 10%
|
|
315
|
+
- Other: 5%
|
|
316
|
+
|
|
317
|
+
### 🎯 Persona-Driven Product Strategy
|
|
318
|
+
**Feature Prioritization:**
|
|
319
|
+
1. **Enterprise Features** (Sarah) - Security, compliance, enterprise integrations
|
|
320
|
+
2. **Developer Experience** (Marcus) - APIs, documentation, developer tools
|
|
321
|
+
3. **Business Intelligence** (Jennifer) - Reporting, analytics, workflow automation
|
|
322
|
+
|
|
323
|
+
**Marketing Message Hierarchy:**
|
|
324
|
+
- **Primary:** Enterprise-grade security and scalability
|
|
325
|
+
- **Secondary:** Developer-friendly implementation
|
|
326
|
+
- **Tertiary:** Business process optimization
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
---
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
## 🔄 Persona Maintenance & Updates
|
|
331
|
+
|
|
332
|
+
### 📅 Review Schedule
|
|
333
|
+
**Quarterly Reviews:**
|
|
334
|
+
- Customer interview insights
|
|
335
|
+
- Product usage pattern changes
|
|
336
|
+
- Market feedback and competitive analysis
|
|
337
|
+
- Support ticket trend analysis
|
|
338
|
+
|
|
339
|
+
**Annual Deep Dive:**
|
|
340
|
+
- Comprehensive persona validation study
|
|
341
|
+
- Market segment evolution analysis
|
|
342
|
+
- New persona identification
|
|
343
|
+
- Anti-persona validation
|
|
344
|
+
|
|
345
|
+
### 📊 Key Performance Indicators
|
|
346
|
+
**Persona Accuracy Metrics:**
|
|
347
|
+
- Customer interview alignment score: >80%
|
|
348
|
+
- Message resonance testing: >70% positive
|
|
349
|
+
- Product feature adoption by persona: >60%
|
|
350
|
+
- Sales conversion by persona segment: Tracked monthly
|
|
351
|
+
|
|
352
|
+
**Persona Effectiveness:**
|
|
353
|
+
- Marketing qualified lead quality improvement
|
|
354
|
+
- Sales cycle reduction by targeted messaging
|
|
355
|
+
- Product feature adoption rates
|
|
356
|
+
- Customer satisfaction scores by persona
|
|
357
|
+
|
|
358
|
+
---
|
|
359
|
+
|
|
360
|
+
**👥 Persona Success Metrics:**
|
|
361
|
+
- Marketing message resonance >70%
|
|
362
|
+
- Product adoption aligned with persona needs
|
|
363
|
+
- Sales cycle optimization by persona
|
|
364
|
+
- Customer satisfaction scores >8.5/10
|
|
365
|
+
- Feature prioritization alignment with persona value
|
|
366
|
+
|
|
367
|
+
**Next Steps:** Use personas to inform user journey mapping (09_user_journeys.md) and guide product development decisions.
|