@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.1.0

package/templates/core/13_risk_register.md

@@ -0,0 +1,605 @@
+# 🎯 Enterprise Risk Register & Management Framework
+
+**Metadata**
+- Last Updated: {{DATE}}
+- Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
+- Related Docs: Consumes 01_prd.md, 06_architecture.md, feeds 18_release_plan.md, 21_postmortem.md
+
+> **🎯 Purpose**
+> Comprehensive enterprise risk management framework for identifying, assessing, tracking, and mitigating project risks across technical, business, and operational domains. This register enables proactive risk management and informed decision-making throughout the project lifecycle.
+
+---
+
+## 🎲 1. Risk Management Framework & Standards
+
+### 1.1 Risk Assessment Matrix
+**Probability Scale (1-5):**
+- **1 - Very Low:** <5% chance of occurrence
+- **2 - Low:** 5-25% chance of occurrence
+- **3 - Medium:** 25-50% chance of occurrence
+- **4 - High:** 50-75% chance of occurrence
+- **5 - Very High:** >75% chance of occurrence
+
+**Impact Scale (1-5):**
+- **1 - Minimal:** <1 week delay, <$10K cost impact
+- **2 - Minor:** 1-2 weeks delay, $10K-50K cost impact
+- **3 - Moderate:** 2-4 weeks delay, $50K-200K cost impact
+- **4 - Major:** 1-3 months delay, $200K-1M cost impact
+- **5 - Critical:** >3 months delay, >$1M cost impact
+
+**Risk Score Calculation:** `Risk Score = Probability × Impact`
+
+### 1.2 Risk Categories & Classification
+| Category | Icon | Description | Escalation Level | Review Frequency |
+|----------|------|-------------|------------------|------------------|
+| **Technical** | ⚙️ | Architecture, development, infrastructure | CTO | Weekly |
+| **Security** | 🔒 | Data breaches, compliance, vulnerabilities | CISO | Daily |
+| **Business** | 💼 | Market, competition, strategy | CEO | Monthly |
+| **Operational** | 🔧 | Resources, processes, dependencies | COO | Weekly |
+| **Financial** | 💰 | Budget, funding, cost overruns | CFO | Monthly |
+| **Legal** | ⚖️ | Compliance, contracts, IP | Legal | Quarterly |
+| **Regulatory** | 📋 | Industry regulations, standards | Compliance | Monthly |
+
+### 1.3 Risk Response Strategies
+**Response Options:**
+- **Accept:** Acknowledge risk and proceed without specific action
+- **Avoid:** Change plans to eliminate the risk entirely
+- **Mitigate:** Reduce probability or impact through specific actions
+- **Transfer:** Shift risk to third party (insurance, vendors)
+- **Monitor:** Track risk that may require future action
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 2. High-Priority Risk Register
+
+### 2.1 Critical Technical Risks (Risk Score 15-25)
+
+#### RISK-001: Legacy System Integration Failure
+**Category:** Technical ⚙️
+**Probability:** 4 (High) | **Impact:** 5 (Critical) | **Risk Score:** 20
+
+**Description:**
+Integration with legacy ERP system may fail due to outdated APIs and poor documentation, potentially blocking core business functionality.
+
+**Root Causes:**
+- 20-year-old legacy system with minimal documentation
+- Custom protocols not following modern standards
+- Limited technical expertise on legacy system
+- No test environment for legacy system available
+
+**Impact Analysis:**
+- **Business Impact:** Complete halt of order processing ($500K/day revenue loss)
+- **Technical Impact:** 3-month delay in product launch
+- **Customer Impact:** Inability to fulfill existing customer orders
+- **Reputation Impact:** Major customer confidence issues
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Primary Action:** Develop robust adapter layer with fallback mechanisms
+- **Timeline:** 6 weeks before integration deadline
+- **Owner:** Senior Integration Architect
+- **Budget:** $150K for external legacy system consultant
+- **Success Criteria:** Successfully process 100 test transactions
+
+**Contingency Plan:**
+- **Fallback Option:** Manual order processing workflow
+- **Trigger Criteria:** Integration testing fails after 4 weeks
+- **Resource Requirements:** 10 additional customer service staff
+- **Cost Impact:** $200K/month operational overhead
+
+**Monitoring & Control:**
+- **KPIs:** Integration test success rate, data consistency checks
+- **Review Frequency:** Weekly technical reviews
+- **Escalation Trigger:** <80% integration test success rate
+- **Status Updates:** Daily standup reports to CTO
+
+#### RISK-002: Scalability Performance Bottlenecks
+**Category:** Technical ⚙️
+**Probability:** 3 (Medium) | **Impact:** 4 (Major) | **Risk Score:** 12
+
+**Description:**
+System may not handle expected user load during peak traffic, leading to performance degradation and potential service outages.
+
+**Root Causes:**
+- Unproven architecture at scale
+- Limited load testing capabilities
+- Database queries not optimized for high volume
+- Insufficient caching strategy
+
+**Impact Analysis:**
+- **Performance Impact:** Response times >5 seconds during peak load
+- **User Impact:** 40% user drop-off due to poor performance
+- **Revenue Impact:** $100K/month in lost conversions
+- **Infrastructure Impact:** Emergency scaling costs
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Load Testing:** Comprehensive performance testing with 10x expected load
+- **Architecture Review:** Database optimization and caching implementation
+- **Infrastructure:** Auto-scaling and CDN implementation
+- **Monitoring:** Real-time performance monitoring and alerting
+
+**Success Metrics:**
+- Response times <2 seconds at 5x expected load
+- 99.9% uptime during peak traffic periods
+- Auto-scaling triggers working within 30 seconds
+- Database query performance <100ms average
+
+### 2.2 Security & Compliance Risks
+
+#### RISK-003: Data Privacy Regulation Compliance Failure
+**Category:** Legal ⚖️
+**Probability:** 3 (Medium) | **Impact:** 5 (Critical) | **Risk Score:** 15
+
+**Description:**
+Failure to comply with GDPR, CCPA, and other data privacy regulations could result in significant fines and legal challenges.
+
+**Regulatory Requirements:**
+- **GDPR:** EU data protection regulation (fines up to 4% of revenue)
+- **CCPA:** California consumer privacy act requirements
+- **HIPAA:** Health data protection standards (if applicable)
+- **SOX:** Financial data compliance requirements
+
+**Compliance Gap Analysis:**
+| Requirement | Current Status | Gap | Risk Level |
+|-------------|----------------|-----|------------|
+| **Data Consent Management** | Partial | Missing explicit consent UI | High |
+| **Right to Deletion** | Not Implemented | Complete gap | Critical |
+| **Data Portability** | Planned | 6 weeks behind schedule | Medium |
+| **Breach Notification** | Basic | Missing automated workflows | High |
+| **Data Encryption** | Implemented | Compliant | Low |
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Legal Review:** Comprehensive compliance audit with external counsel
+- **Technical Implementation:** Privacy-by-design architecture
+- **Process Implementation:** Data handling procedures and training
+- **Documentation:** Compliance documentation and audit trails
+
+**Compliance Roadmap:**
+1. **Week 1-2:** External compliance audit and gap analysis
+2. **Week 3-6:** Implement consent management and deletion workflows
+3. **Week 7-8:** Data portability and breach notification systems
+4. **Week 9-10:** Staff training and documentation completion
+5. **Week 11-12:** Final compliance validation and certification
+
+#### RISK-004: Security Breach / Cyber Attack
+**Category:** Security 🔒
+**Probability:** 2 (Low) | **Impact:** 5 (Critical) | **Risk Score:** 10
+
+**Description:**
+Potential security breach could expose customer data, disrupt operations, and damage company reputation.
+
+**Attack Vectors:**
+- **SQL Injection:** Database vulnerabilities
+- **Cross-Site Scripting (XSS):** Frontend input validation gaps
+- **API Security:** Insufficient authentication/authorization
+- **Social Engineering:** Staff-targeted phishing attacks
+- **Infrastructure:** Cloud misconfiguration vulnerabilities
+
+**Security Controls Assessment:**
+```yaml
+security_controls:
+  authentication:
+    status: implemented
+    coverage: 95%
+    gaps: ["MFA for admin accounts", "session timeout"]
+
+  authorization:
+    status: partial
+    coverage: 80%
+    gaps: ["role-based access control", "API rate limiting"]
+
+  data_protection:
+    status: implemented
+    coverage: 90%
+    gaps: ["field-level encryption", "key rotation"]
+
+  monitoring:
+    status: basic
+    coverage: 60%
+    gaps: ["SIEM integration", "anomaly detection"]
+```
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Security Assessment:** Third-party penetration testing
+- **Technical Controls:** WAF, DDoS protection, encryption at rest/transit
+- **Process Controls:** Security training, incident response procedures
+- **Monitoring:** 24/7 SOC monitoring and threat detection
+
+### 2.3 Business & Operational Risks
+
+#### RISK-005: Key Personnel Departure
+**Category:** Operational 🔧
+**Probability:** 3 (Medium) | **Impact:** 4 (Major) | **Risk Score:** 12
+
+**Description:**
+Loss of critical team members could significantly impact project timeline and quality.
+
+**Critical Personnel Assessment:**
+| Role | Risk Level | Impact | Knowledge Documentation | Backup |
+|------|------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
+| **Lead Architect** | High | Project delay 6-8 weeks | 60% documented | 1 person |
+| **DevOps Engineer** | High | Deployment issues | 40% documented | None |
+| **Product Owner** | Medium | Requirements gaps | 80% documented | 1 person |
+| **Security Engineer** | High | Compliance delays | 50% documented | External |
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Knowledge Transfer:** Comprehensive documentation and cross-training
+- **Retention:** Competitive compensation and career development
+- **Backup Planning:** Identify and train backup personnel
+- **External Support:** Establish relationships with consulting firms
+
+**Knowledge Management Plan:**
+1. **Documentation:** All critical processes and decisions documented
+2. **Cross-training:** Each critical role has trained backup
+3. **Video Recording:** Complex procedures recorded for reference
+4. **External Relationships:** Consultant relationships for emergency support
+
+#### RISK-006: Third-Party Vendor Service Disruption
+**Category:** Operational 🔧
+**Probability:** 2 (Low) | **Impact:** 4 (Major) | **Risk Score:** 8
+
+**Description:**
+Critical third-party services (AWS, Stripe, Auth0) could experience outages affecting our system availability.
+
+**Vendor Dependency Analysis:**
+| Vendor | Service | Criticality | SLA | Backup Plan |
+|--------|---------|-------------|-----|-------------|
+| **AWS** | Infrastructure | Critical | 99.99% | Multi-region deployment |
+| **Stripe** | Payments | Critical | 99.99% | PayPal backup integration |
+| **Auth0** | Authentication | High | 99.9% | Custom auth fallback |
+| **SendGrid** | Email | Medium | 99.9% | AWS SES backup |
+| **Datadog** | Monitoring | Low | 99.9% | CloudWatch fallback |
+
+**Vendor Risk Mitigation:**
+- **Multi-vendor Strategy:** Critical services have backup vendors
+- **Geographic Distribution:** Services distributed across regions
+- **SLA Monitoring:** Real-time vendor performance monitoring
+- **Contractual Protection:** SLA guarantees and penalty clauses
+
+---
+
+## 📊 3. Medium-Priority Risk Register
+
+### 3.1 Technical Risks (Risk Score 6-12)
+
+#### RISK-007: API Rate Limiting and Third-Party Integration Issues
+**Category:** Technical ⚙️
+**Probability:** 3 (Medium) | **Impact:** 2 (Minor) | **Risk Score:** 6
+
+**Third-Party Integration Assessment:**
+| Integration | Rate Limits | Current Usage | Risk Level | Mitigation |
+|-------------|-------------|---------------|------------|------------|
+| **Stripe API** | 100 req/sec | 45 req/sec | Low | Request batching |
+| **Google Maps** | 50K req/day | 30K req/day | Medium | Caching strategy |
+| **SendGrid** | 10K emails/day | 8K emails/day | High | Upgrade plan |
+| **GitHub API** | 5K req/hour | 2K req/hour | Low | Token rotation |
+
+**Mitigation Strategy:**
+- **Usage Monitoring:** Real-time API usage tracking
+- **Caching:** Implement aggressive caching for external APIs
+- **Batching:** Batch requests where possible
+- **Graceful Degradation:** Fallback mechanisms for API failures
+
+#### RISK-008: Database Migration and Data Integrity Issues
+**Category:** Technical ⚙️
+**Probability:** 2 (Low) | **Impact:** 4 (Major) | **Risk Score:** 8
+
+**Migration Complexity Assessment:**
+- **Data Volume:** 50M records across 200 tables
+- **Downtime Window:** 4-hour maintenance window
+- **Data Dependencies:** Complex foreign key relationships
+- **Legacy Data:** Inconsistent data formats requiring cleanup
+
+**Migration Risk Mitigation:**
+- **Rehearsal Testing:** Complete migration rehearsal in staging
+- **Rollback Plan:** Verified rollback procedures within 30 minutes
+- **Data Validation:** Automated data integrity checks
+- **Phased Approach:** Gradual migration with validation checkpoints
+
+### 3.2 Business Risks (Risk Score 4-10)
+
+#### RISK-009: Market Competition and Feature Parity
+**Category:** Business 💼
+**Probability:** 4 (High) | **Impact:** 2 (Minor) | **Risk Score:** 8
+
+**Competitive Analysis:**
+| Competitor | Market Share | Key Advantages | Threat Level |
+|------------|-------------|----------------|--------------|
+| **CompetitorA** | 35% | Established brand | High |
+| **CompetitorB** | 20% | Lower pricing | Medium |
+| **CompetitorC** | 15% | Better UX | Medium |
+| **New Entrants** | 5% | Modern tech stack | Low |
+
+**Competitive Response Strategy:**
+- **Feature Differentiation:** Unique value propositions
+- **Speed to Market:** Rapid iteration and deployment
+- **Customer Focus:** Superior customer experience
+- **Pricing Strategy:** Competitive but sustainable pricing
+
+#### RISK-010: Regulatory Changes and Compliance Updates
+**Category:** Legal ⚖️
+**Probability:** 2 (Low) | **Impact:** 3 (Moderate) | **Risk Score:** 6
+
+**Regulatory Monitoring:**
+- **Data Privacy:** GDPR updates and new state privacy laws
+- **Financial Services:** PCI DSS compliance requirements
+- **Industry Standards:** Emerging security standards
+- **International:** Global expansion compliance requirements
+
+**Compliance Monitoring Strategy:**
+- **Legal Counsel:** Regular compliance reviews with legal team
+- **Industry Associations:** Active participation in industry groups
+- **Regulatory Tracking:** Automated tracking of regulatory changes
+- **Compliance Calendar:** Proactive compliance planning calendar
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 4. Risk Monitoring & Control Framework
+
+### 4.1 Risk Assessment Automation
+**Automated Risk Indicators:**
+```yaml
+# Risk monitoring configuration
+risk_monitoring:
+  technical_risks:
+    performance:
+      metrics: [response_time, error_rate, cpu_usage]
+      thresholds: {response_time: 2000ms, error_rate: 1%, cpu_usage: 80%}
+      alert_channel: engineering-alerts
+
+    security:
+      metrics: [failed_logins, vulnerability_scan, ssl_expiry]
+      thresholds: {failed_logins: 10/hour, vulnerabilities: 0, ssl_days: 30}
+      alert_channel: security-alerts
+
+  business_risks:
+    market:
+      metrics: [customer_churn, competitor_analysis, market_share]
+      thresholds: {churn_rate: 5%, market_decline: 10%}
+      alert_channel: business-alerts
+
+    operational:
+      metrics: [team_velocity, budget_variance, vendor_sla]
+      thresholds: {velocity_drop: 20%, budget_variance: 10%}
+      alert_channel: operations-alerts
+```
+
+### 4.2 Risk Review & Escalation Process
+**Review Schedule:**
+- **Daily:** Security and operational risk monitoring
+- **Weekly:** Technical risk assessment and mitigation status
+- **Monthly:** Business risk evaluation and strategic adjustments
+- **Quarterly:** Complete risk register review and updates
+
+**Escalation Matrix:**
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Risk Identified] --> B{Risk Score Assessment}
+    B -->|1-5| C[Team Level Management]
+    B -->|6-12| D[Manager Review Required]
+    B -->|13-18| E[Director Escalation]
+    B -->|19-25| F[Executive Team Alert]
+
+    C --> G[Weekly Review]
+    D --> H[Bi-weekly Review]
+    E --> I[Weekly Executive Update]
+    F --> J[Immediate Action Required]
+
+    G --> K[Risk Register Update]
+    H --> K
+    I --> K
+    J --> L[Crisis Management]
+```
+
+### 4.3 Risk Communication & Reporting
+**Stakeholder Communication Plan:**
+| Stakeholder | Frequency | Format | Content |
+|-------------|-----------|--------|---------|
+| **Development Team** | Weekly | Standup briefing | Technical risks, blockers |
+| **Project Managers** | Bi-weekly | Status report | All risks, mitigation progress |
+| **Executive Team** | Monthly | Executive dashboard | High-impact risks, trends |
+| **Board of Directors** | Quarterly | Board presentation | Strategic risks, major changes |
+
+**Risk Dashboard Metrics:**
+- **Risk Distribution:** Breakdown by category and severity
+- **Trend Analysis:** Risk score changes over time
+- **Mitigation Effectiveness:** Success rate of mitigation actions
+- **Early Warning Indicators:** Predictive risk metrics
+
+---
+
+## 📈 5. Risk Mitigation Planning & Execution
+
+### 5.1 Mitigation Strategy Templates
+
+#### Technical Risk Mitigation Template
+```yaml
+technical_mitigation:
+  risk_id: TECH-XXX
+  strategy: [accept, avoid, mitigate, transfer]
+
+  mitigation_actions:
+    - action: "Implement automated testing"
+      owner: "QA Team"
+      timeline: "2 weeks"
+      budget: "$15K"
+      success_criteria: "95% test coverage"
+
+    - action: "Setup monitoring alerts"
+      owner: "DevOps Team"
+      timeline: "1 week"
+      budget: "$5K"
+      success_criteria: "Alert response <5 minutes"
+
+  contingency_plan:
+    trigger: "Mitigation actions ineffective"
+    fallback: "External consultant engagement"
+    timeline: "48 hours"
+    budget: "$50K"
+```
+
+#### Business Risk Mitigation Template
+```yaml
+business_mitigation:
+  risk_id: BIZ-XXX
+  strategy: [accept, avoid, mitigate, transfer]
+
+  mitigation_actions:
+    - action: "Market research and competitive analysis"
+      owner: "Product Marketing"
+      timeline: "4 weeks"
+      budget: "$25K"
+      success_criteria: "Competitive positioning defined"
+
+    - action: "Customer retention program"
+      owner: "Customer Success"
+      timeline: "6 weeks"
+      budget: "$100K"
+      success_criteria: "Churn reduction 20%"
+
+  success_metrics:
+    - metric: "Market share growth"
+      target: "5% increase"
+      measurement: "Monthly surveys"
+
+    - metric: "Customer satisfaction"
+      target: "NPS >50"
+      measurement: "Quarterly NPS survey"
+```
+
+### 5.2 Risk Treatment Progress Tracking
+**Mitigation Status Dashboard:**
+| Risk ID | Risk Title | Current Score | Target Score | Progress | Owner | Due Date |
+|---------|------------|---------------|--------------|----------|-------|----------|
+| RISK-001 | Legacy Integration | 20 | 8 | 60% | Architecture Team | 2024-03-15 |
+| RISK-002 | Scalability Issues | 12 | 6 | 40% | Performance Team | 2024-02-28 |
+| RISK-003 | GDPR Compliance | 15 | 5 | 80% | Legal/Compliance | 2024-02-15 |
+| RISK-004 | Security Breach | 10 | 4 | 70% | Security Team | 2024-03-01 |
+
+### 5.3 Contingency Planning Framework
+**Contingency Plan Components:**
+1. **Trigger Conditions:** Specific conditions that activate the plan
+2. **Response Team:** Designated team members and responsibilities
+3. **Action Steps:** Detailed procedures to execute
+4. **Resource Requirements:** Budget, personnel, and tools needed
+5. **Communication Plan:** Stakeholder notification procedures
+6. **Success Criteria:** Measurable outcomes for plan effectiveness
+
+**Emergency Response Procedures:**
+```yaml
+emergency_response:
+  security_breach:
+    response_time: "15 minutes"
+    team: [CISO, Security Engineer, Legal Counsel]
+    actions: [isolate_systems, assess_damage, notify_authorities]
+    communication: [executive_team, customers, media]
+
+  system_outage:
+    response_time: "5 minutes"
+    team: [DevOps Lead, Infrastructure Team, Customer Support]
+    actions: [activate_backups, restore_service, customer_notification]
+    communication: [status_page, customer_alerts, internal_teams]
+
+  data_loss:
+    response_time: "30 minutes"
+    team: [Database Admin, Backup Specialist, Data Recovery Team]
+    actions: [assess_loss, restore_backups, validate_integrity]
+    communication: [affected_customers, regulatory_bodies, insurance]
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🏆 6. Risk Management Success Metrics
+
+### 6.1 Key Performance Indicators
+**Risk Management Effectiveness:**
+- **Risk Identification Rate:** 95% of risks identified before impact
+- **Mitigation Success Rate:** 85% of mitigations achieve target risk reduction
+- **Early Warning Accuracy:** 90% of triggered alerts lead to preventive action
+- **Response Time:** Average response time <2 hours for high-impact risks
+- **Cost Avoidance:** $2M+ in potential costs avoided through risk management
+
+### 6.2 Risk Maturity Assessment
+**Maturity Levels:**
+1. **Initial (1):** Ad-hoc risk identification, reactive approach
+2. **Developing (2):** Basic risk register, some mitigation planning
+3. **Defined (3):** Structured risk process, regular reviews
+4. **Managed (4):** Quantitative risk management, predictive analytics
+5. **Optimizing (5):** Continuous improvement, risk-informed decisions
+
+**Current Maturity Score:** 3.2/5 (Defined, trending toward Managed)
+
+**Improvement Roadmap:**
+- **Q1 2024:** Implement automated risk monitoring (Target: 3.5)
+- **Q2 2024:** Deploy predictive risk analytics (Target: 4.0)
+- **Q3 2024:** Integrate risk-based decision making (Target: 4.2)
+- **Q4 2024:** Achieve optimized risk management (Target: 4.5)
+
+### 6.3 Business Value Metrics
+**Risk Management ROI:**
+- **Investment:** $200K in risk management tools and processes
+- **Cost Avoidance:** $2.5M in prevented issues and delays
+- **ROI:** 1,150% return on risk management investment
+- **Time Savings:** 3 months saved through proactive risk management
+- **Quality Improvement:** 40% reduction in production incidents
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 7. Continuous Risk Improvement
+
+### 7.1 Risk Learning Framework
+**Post-Incident Analysis:**
+- Root cause analysis for all realized risks
+- Effectiveness review of mitigation strategies
+- Process improvement recommendations
+- Knowledge sharing across teams
+
+**Risk Intelligence Gathering:**
+- Industry risk reports and benchmarks
+- Vendor risk assessments and updates
+- Technology trend analysis and implications
+- Regulatory change monitoring and impact assessment
+
+### 7.2 Risk Management Tool Integration
+**Technology Stack:**
+```yaml
+risk_management_tools:
+  risk_register:
+    tool: "Jira + Custom Dashboard"
+    features: [tracking, workflow, reporting]
+
+  monitoring:
+    tool: "Datadog + Custom Alerts"
+    features: [real_time, predictive, integration]
+
+  assessment:
+    tool: "Risk Management Platform"
+    features: [quantitative_analysis, monte_carlo, reporting]
+
+  communication:
+    tool: "Slack + Email Integration"
+    features: [automated_alerts, escalation, reporting]
+```
+
+### 7.3 Risk Culture Development
+**Risk Awareness Training:**
+- Monthly risk awareness sessions for all team members
+- Role-specific risk training for key positions
+- Risk scenario exercises and tabletop simulations
+- Risk management certification for leaders
+
+**Risk-Informed Decision Making:**
+- Risk assessment required for all major decisions
+- Risk impact consideration in project planning
+- Regular risk review in team meetings
+- Risk metrics included in performance reviews
+
+---
+
+**🎯 Risk Management Success Metrics:**
+- Risk identification effectiveness: 95%+
+- Mitigation success rate: 85%+
+- Cost avoidance: $2M+ annually
+- Response time: <2 hours for critical risks
+- Risk management maturity: 4.0+/5.0
+
+**Next Steps:** Integrate risk register with release planning (18_release_plan.md) and post-incident analysis (21_postmortem.md) to create comprehensive risk management lifecycle.