@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.1.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli.js +1 -1
- package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/core/index.d.ts +62 -0
- package/dist/core/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/core/index.js +137 -0
- package/dist/core/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +11 -0
- package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts +7 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.js +216 -0
- package/dist/mcp/index.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +30 -10
- package/templates/core/01_prd.md +465 -0
- package/templates/core/02_adr.md +432 -0
- package/templates/core/03_generate_tasks.md +418 -0
- package/templates/core/04_process_task_list.md +430 -0
- package/templates/core/05_market_research.md +483 -0
- package/templates/core/06_architecture.md +561 -0
- package/templates/core/07_competitor_analysis.md +462 -0
- package/templates/core/08_personas.md +367 -0
- package/templates/core/09_user_journeys.md +385 -0
- package/templates/core/10_user_stories.md +582 -0
- package/templates/core/11_acceptance_criteria.md +687 -0
- package/templates/core/12_qa_gate.md +737 -0
- package/templates/core/13_risk_register.md +605 -0
- package/templates/core/14_project_brief.md +477 -0
- package/templates/core/15_brainstorming.md +653 -0
- package/templates/core/16_frontend_spec.md +1479 -0
- package/templates/core/17_test_plan.md +878 -0
- package/templates/core/18_release_plan.md +994 -0
- package/templates/core/19_operational_readiness.md +1100 -0
- package/templates/core/20_metrics_dashboard.md +1375 -0
- package/templates/core/21_postmortem.md +1122 -0
- package/templates/core/22_playtest_usability.md +1624 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,582 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# 📝 User Stories & Acceptance Criteria Framework
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Metadata**
|
|
4
|
+
- Last Updated: {{DATE}}
|
|
5
|
+
- Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
|
|
6
|
+
- Related Docs: Consumes 09_user_journeys.md, feeds 11_acceptance_criteria.md, 03_generate_tasks.md
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
> **🎯 Purpose**
|
|
9
|
+
> Comprehensive user story framework that translates user journeys and personas into actionable development requirements. Stories follow INVEST principles with detailed acceptance criteria, enabling precise development estimation and quality validation.
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
---
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## 📋 1. User Story Framework & Standards
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
### 1.1 INVEST Principles Compliance
|
|
16
|
+
**Independent:** Each story can be developed and tested in isolation
|
|
17
|
+
**Negotiable:** Details can be discussed and refined during development
|
|
18
|
+
**Valuable:** Each story delivers measurable business value
|
|
19
|
+
**Estimable:** Story scope is clear enough for accurate estimation
|
|
20
|
+
**Small:** Story can be completed within a single sprint
|
|
21
|
+
**Testable:** Success criteria are clearly defined and verifiable
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### 1.2 Story Template Structure
|
|
24
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
25
|
+
# Standard User Story Format
|
|
26
|
+
**Story ID:** US-{EPIC}-{NUMBER}
|
|
27
|
+
**Epic:** {Epic Name}
|
|
28
|
+
**Priority:** High/Medium/Low
|
|
29
|
+
**Story Points:** {1-13 Fibonacci}
|
|
30
|
+
**Sprint:** {Sprint Number}
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## User Story
|
|
33
|
+
As a {specific user persona}
|
|
34
|
+
I want {specific functionality}
|
|
35
|
+
So that {clear business outcome}
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Acceptance Criteria
|
|
38
|
+
Given {initial context}
|
|
39
|
+
When {user action}
|
|
40
|
+
Then {expected outcome}
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
And {additional verification}
|
|
43
|
+
```
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### 1.3 Story Categorization System
|
|
46
|
+
| Category | Icon | Purpose | Estimation Range | Definition of Done |
|
|
47
|
+
|----------|------|---------|------------------|-------------------|
|
|
48
|
+
| **Feature** | 🎯 | New functionality | 3-8 SP | Full feature complete |
|
|
49
|
+
| **Enhancement** | ⚡ | Improve existing | 1-5 SP | Performance/UX improved |
|
|
50
|
+
| **Bug Fix** | 🐛 | Defect resolution | 1-3 SP | Bug eliminated |
|
|
51
|
+
| **Technical Debt** | 🔧 | Code quality | 2-8 SP | Architecture improved |
|
|
52
|
+
| **Spike** | 🔬 | Research/POC | 1-3 SP | Decision documented |
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
---
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## 🚀 2. Epic-Level User Stories
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### Epic: User Authentication & Security
|
|
59
|
+
**Business Goal:** Secure user access with frictionless experience
|
|
60
|
+
**Success Metrics:** <2 second login, 99.9% uptime, zero security incidents
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
#### US-AUTH-001: Social Media Login Integration
|
|
63
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 5 | **Sprint:** 1
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
66
|
+
As a new user visiting the platform
|
|
67
|
+
I want to sign up using my Google/Facebook/GitHub account
|
|
68
|
+
So that I can access the platform quickly without creating new credentials
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
71
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
72
|
+
Scenario: Successful Google OAuth Login
|
|
73
|
+
Given I am on the login page
|
|
74
|
+
When I click "Continue with Google"
|
|
75
|
+
Then I should be redirected to Google OAuth
|
|
76
|
+
And after authorization, I should be logged into the platform
|
|
77
|
+
And my profile should be populated with Google account data
|
|
78
|
+
And I should see a welcome message with my name
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
Scenario: First-time Social Login Account Creation
|
|
81
|
+
Given I am a new user using social login
|
|
82
|
+
When I complete Google OAuth for the first time
|
|
83
|
+
Then a new account should be created automatically
|
|
84
|
+
And I should be prompted to complete my profile
|
|
85
|
+
And I should receive a welcome email
|
|
86
|
+
And my account status should be "Active"
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
Scenario: Social Login Error Handling
|
|
89
|
+
Given I attempt social login
|
|
90
|
+
When the OAuth provider returns an error
|
|
91
|
+
Then I should see a user-friendly error message
|
|
92
|
+
And I should have the option to try again
|
|
93
|
+
And I should be able to use alternative login methods
|
|
94
|
+
And the error should be logged for monitoring
|
|
95
|
+
```
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Technical Requirements:**
|
|
98
|
+
- OAuth 2.0 implementation with PKCE
|
|
99
|
+
- Support for Google, Facebook, GitHub, LinkedIn
|
|
100
|
+
- Automatic account linking for existing email addresses
|
|
101
|
+
- Secure token storage with refresh capability
|
|
102
|
+
- Rate limiting and fraud detection
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
#### US-AUTH-002: Multi-Factor Authentication
|
|
105
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 8 | **Sprint:** 2
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
108
|
+
As a security-conscious user
|
|
109
|
+
I want to enable two-factor authentication on my account
|
|
110
|
+
So that my data remains secure even if my password is compromised
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
113
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
114
|
+
Scenario: Enable TOTP-based 2FA
|
|
115
|
+
Given I am logged into my account settings
|
|
116
|
+
When I choose to enable 2FA
|
|
117
|
+
Then I should see a QR code for authenticator app setup
|
|
118
|
+
And I should be able to scan the QR code with Google Authenticator
|
|
119
|
+
And I should verify setup with a test code
|
|
120
|
+
And backup codes should be generated and displayed
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
Scenario: Login with 2FA Enabled
|
|
123
|
+
Given I have 2FA enabled on my account
|
|
124
|
+
When I enter correct username and password
|
|
125
|
+
Then I should be prompted for my 2FA code
|
|
126
|
+
And entering the correct TOTP code should log me in
|
|
127
|
+
And entering an incorrect code should show an error
|
|
128
|
+
And I should have option to use backup codes
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
Scenario: 2FA Recovery Process
|
|
131
|
+
Given I have lost access to my authenticator device
|
|
132
|
+
When I use a valid backup code
|
|
133
|
+
Then I should be logged in successfully
|
|
134
|
+
And the used backup code should be invalidated
|
|
135
|
+
And I should be prompted to reconfigure 2FA
|
|
136
|
+
```
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
**Security Requirements:**
|
|
139
|
+
- TOTP algorithm compliance (RFC 6238)
|
|
140
|
+
- Secure QR code generation with proper encoding
|
|
141
|
+
- Backup code generation (8 codes, single-use)
|
|
142
|
+
- Rate limiting on 2FA attempts
|
|
143
|
+
- Account lockout after failed attempts
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
#### US-AUTH-003: Password Reset & Recovery
|
|
146
|
+
**Priority:** Medium | **Points:** 5 | **Sprint:** 2
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
149
|
+
As a user who has forgotten my password
|
|
150
|
+
I want to reset my password securely via email
|
|
151
|
+
So that I can regain access to my account without compromising security
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
154
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
155
|
+
Scenario: Successful Password Reset
|
|
156
|
+
Given I am on the login page
|
|
157
|
+
When I click "Forgot Password"
|
|
158
|
+
And I enter my registered email address
|
|
159
|
+
Then I should receive a password reset email within 5 minutes
|
|
160
|
+
And the reset link should be valid for 1 hour
|
|
161
|
+
And clicking the link should allow me to set a new password
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
Scenario: Password Strength Validation
|
|
164
|
+
Given I am setting a new password via reset
|
|
165
|
+
When I enter a password
|
|
166
|
+
Then it should require minimum 8 characters
|
|
167
|
+
And it should require at least one uppercase letter
|
|
168
|
+
And it should require at least one number
|
|
169
|
+
And it should require at least one special character
|
|
170
|
+
And it should not allow common passwords
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
Scenario: Reset Link Security
|
|
173
|
+
Given I have used a password reset link
|
|
174
|
+
When I attempt to use the same link again
|
|
175
|
+
Then it should show "Link already used" error
|
|
176
|
+
And I should be directed to request a new reset
|
|
177
|
+
And the old link should be permanently invalidated
|
|
178
|
+
```
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
---
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
## 💰 3. Payment & Billing Stories
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
### Epic: Subscription Management
|
|
185
|
+
**Business Goal:** Seamless subscription lifecycle with multiple payment options
|
|
186
|
+
**Success Metrics:** 95% payment success rate, <1% involuntary churn
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
#### US-PAY-001: Stripe Payment Integration
|
|
189
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 8 | **Sprint:** 3
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
192
|
+
As a user ready to upgrade to a paid plan
|
|
193
|
+
I want to securely enter my payment information and complete purchase
|
|
194
|
+
So that I can access premium features immediately
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
197
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
198
|
+
Scenario: Successful Credit Card Payment
|
|
199
|
+
Given I am on the pricing page
|
|
200
|
+
When I select a premium plan
|
|
201
|
+
And I enter valid credit card information
|
|
202
|
+
And I click "Subscribe Now"
|
|
203
|
+
Then my payment should be processed successfully
|
|
204
|
+
And I should receive email confirmation
|
|
205
|
+
And my account should be upgraded immediately
|
|
206
|
+
And I should have access to premium features
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
Scenario: Payment Method Validation
|
|
209
|
+
Given I am entering payment information
|
|
210
|
+
When I input card details
|
|
211
|
+
Then the card number should be validated in real-time
|
|
212
|
+
And expiration date should be validated
|
|
213
|
+
And CVV should be required and masked
|
|
214
|
+
And invalid cards should show immediate feedback
|
|
215
|
+
And I should see card brand icon (Visa/MC/Amex)
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
Scenario: Failed Payment Handling
|
|
218
|
+
Given I attempt to subscribe with invalid payment method
|
|
219
|
+
When the payment fails
|
|
220
|
+
Then I should see a clear error message
|
|
221
|
+
And I should remain on the payment page
|
|
222
|
+
And I should be able to try a different payment method
|
|
223
|
+
And the failed attempt should be logged securely
|
|
224
|
+
```
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
**Technical Requirements:**
|
|
227
|
+
- PCI DSS compliant payment processing
|
|
228
|
+
- Support for major credit cards and digital wallets
|
|
229
|
+
- Real-time payment validation
|
|
230
|
+
- Automatic retry logic for failed payments
|
|
231
|
+
- Webhook handling for payment status updates
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
#### US-PAY-002: Subscription Plan Management
|
|
234
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 5 | **Sprint:** 4
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
237
|
+
As a paying subscriber
|
|
238
|
+
I want to view and modify my subscription plan
|
|
239
|
+
So that I can adjust my service level based on my changing needs
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
242
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
243
|
+
Scenario: View Current Subscription
|
|
244
|
+
Given I am a paid subscriber
|
|
245
|
+
When I visit my account settings
|
|
246
|
+
Then I should see my current plan details
|
|
247
|
+
And I should see my next billing date
|
|
248
|
+
And I should see my billing amount
|
|
249
|
+
And I should see my usage vs. plan limits
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
Scenario: Upgrade Subscription Plan
|
|
252
|
+
Given I am on a basic paid plan
|
|
253
|
+
When I choose to upgrade to a higher tier
|
|
254
|
+
Then I should see the price difference
|
|
255
|
+
And I should see prorated billing explanation
|
|
256
|
+
And I should be able to upgrade immediately
|
|
257
|
+
And my new features should activate instantly
|
|
258
|
+
|
|
259
|
+
Scenario: Downgrade Subscription Plan
|
|
260
|
+
Given I am on a premium plan
|
|
261
|
+
When I choose to downgrade
|
|
262
|
+
Then I should be warned about feature loss
|
|
263
|
+
And downgrade should take effect at next billing cycle
|
|
264
|
+
And I should retain current features until then
|
|
265
|
+
And I should receive confirmation email
|
|
266
|
+
```
|
|
267
|
+
|
|
268
|
+
---
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
## 📊 4. Analytics & Reporting Stories
|
|
271
|
+
|
|
272
|
+
### Epic: User Analytics Dashboard
|
|
273
|
+
**Business Goal:** Empower users with actionable insights from their data
|
|
274
|
+
**Success Metrics:** 70% dashboard engagement, 4.5+ user satisfaction
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
#### US-ANALYTICS-001: Real-time Usage Dashboard
|
|
277
|
+
**Priority:** Medium | **Points:** 8 | **Sprint:** 5
|
|
278
|
+
|
|
279
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
280
|
+
As a business user who needs to track performance
|
|
281
|
+
I want to see real-time analytics on my dashboard
|
|
282
|
+
So that I can make data-driven decisions quickly
|
|
283
|
+
|
|
284
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
285
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
286
|
+
Scenario: Dashboard Data Visualization
|
|
287
|
+
Given I have been using the platform for at least 7 days
|
|
288
|
+
When I visit my analytics dashboard
|
|
289
|
+
Then I should see key metrics visualized in charts
|
|
290
|
+
And data should update every 30 seconds
|
|
291
|
+
And I should see trend lines for the past 30 days
|
|
292
|
+
And I should be able to hover for detailed values
|
|
293
|
+
|
|
294
|
+
Scenario: Custom Date Range Selection
|
|
295
|
+
Given I am viewing my analytics dashboard
|
|
296
|
+
When I select a custom date range
|
|
297
|
+
Then all charts should update to reflect the selected period
|
|
298
|
+
And I should see comparative data from previous period
|
|
299
|
+
And I should be able to export data for the selected range
|
|
300
|
+
And the URL should update to allow bookmarking
|
|
301
|
+
|
|
302
|
+
Scenario: Performance and Loading
|
|
303
|
+
Given I access the analytics dashboard
|
|
304
|
+
When the page loads
|
|
305
|
+
Then the initial data should load within 3 seconds
|
|
306
|
+
And charts should render smoothly without lag
|
|
307
|
+
And I should see loading states for slow-loading components
|
|
308
|
+
And the dashboard should be responsive on mobile devices
|
|
309
|
+
```
|
|
310
|
+
|
|
311
|
+
**Technical Requirements:**
|
|
312
|
+
- Real-time data streaming with WebSocket connections
|
|
313
|
+
- Interactive charts using D3.js or Chart.js
|
|
314
|
+
- Efficient data aggregation and caching
|
|
315
|
+
- Mobile-responsive design
|
|
316
|
+
- Export functionality (CSV, PDF)
|
|
317
|
+
|
|
318
|
+
---
|
|
319
|
+
|
|
320
|
+
## 🔧 5. Technical & Infrastructure Stories
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
### Epic: Performance Optimization
|
|
323
|
+
**Business Goal:** Ensure optimal user experience through system performance
|
|
324
|
+
**Success Metrics:** <2s page load time, 99.5% uptime
|
|
325
|
+
|
|
326
|
+
#### US-PERF-001: Page Load Speed Optimization
|
|
327
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 5 | **Sprint:** 6
|
|
328
|
+
|
|
329
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
330
|
+
As any user of the platform
|
|
331
|
+
I want pages to load quickly (under 2 seconds)
|
|
332
|
+
So that I can efficiently complete my tasks without frustration
|
|
333
|
+
|
|
334
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
335
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
336
|
+
Scenario: Initial Page Load Performance
|
|
337
|
+
Given I am accessing any page on the platform
|
|
338
|
+
When the page starts loading
|
|
339
|
+
Then the First Contentful Paint should occur within 1.5 seconds
|
|
340
|
+
And the page should be fully interactive within 2.5 seconds
|
|
341
|
+
And the Largest Contentful Paint should occur within 2 seconds
|
|
342
|
+
And the Cumulative Layout Shift should be less than 0.1
|
|
343
|
+
|
|
344
|
+
Scenario: Image Loading Optimization
|
|
345
|
+
Given I am viewing a page with images
|
|
346
|
+
When the page loads
|
|
347
|
+
Then images should load progressively
|
|
348
|
+
And images should be properly sized for the viewport
|
|
349
|
+
And lazy loading should be implemented for below-fold images
|
|
350
|
+
And WebP format should be served when supported
|
|
351
|
+
|
|
352
|
+
Scenario: JavaScript Bundle Optimization
|
|
353
|
+
Given I am loading any page
|
|
354
|
+
When the JavaScript loads
|
|
355
|
+
Then the initial bundle should be less than 250KB gzipped
|
|
356
|
+
And code splitting should be implemented for routes
|
|
357
|
+
And critical CSS should be inlined
|
|
358
|
+
And non-critical resources should be deferred
|
|
359
|
+
```
|
|
360
|
+
|
|
361
|
+
---
|
|
362
|
+
|
|
363
|
+
## 📱 6. Mobile Experience Stories
|
|
364
|
+
|
|
365
|
+
### Epic: Mobile-First Experience
|
|
366
|
+
**Business Goal:** Deliver excellent mobile experience for on-the-go users
|
|
367
|
+
**Success Metrics:** 4.5+ mobile app store rating, 60% mobile usage
|
|
368
|
+
|
|
369
|
+
#### US-MOBILE-001: Responsive Mobile Interface
|
|
370
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 8 | **Sprint:** 7
|
|
371
|
+
|
|
372
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
373
|
+
As a user accessing the platform on my mobile device
|
|
374
|
+
I want the interface to be fully functional and easy to use
|
|
375
|
+
So that I can accomplish all tasks regardless of device
|
|
376
|
+
|
|
377
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
378
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
379
|
+
Scenario: Mobile Navigation
|
|
380
|
+
Given I am using the platform on a mobile device
|
|
381
|
+
When I navigate through the application
|
|
382
|
+
Then all navigation elements should be touch-friendly
|
|
383
|
+
And menus should be easily accessible
|
|
384
|
+
And I should be able to reach all functionality
|
|
385
|
+
And the interface should work in both portrait and landscape
|
|
386
|
+
|
|
387
|
+
Scenario: Touch Interactions
|
|
388
|
+
Given I am using touch gestures on mobile
|
|
389
|
+
When I interact with interface elements
|
|
390
|
+
Then tap targets should be at least 44px in size
|
|
391
|
+
And swipe gestures should work where appropriate
|
|
392
|
+
And pinch-to-zoom should be disabled on form inputs
|
|
393
|
+
And long-press actions should have clear feedback
|
|
394
|
+
|
|
395
|
+
Scenario: Mobile Form Interactions
|
|
396
|
+
Given I am filling out forms on mobile
|
|
397
|
+
When I interact with form fields
|
|
398
|
+
Then the correct keyboard should appear for each field type
|
|
399
|
+
And form validation should work on mobile
|
|
400
|
+
And error messages should be clearly visible
|
|
401
|
+
And form submission should work reliably
|
|
402
|
+
```
|
|
403
|
+
|
|
404
|
+
---
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
## 🔍 7. Search & Discovery Stories
|
|
407
|
+
|
|
408
|
+
### Epic: Advanced Search Functionality
|
|
409
|
+
**Business Goal:** Help users quickly find relevant content and features
|
|
410
|
+
**Success Metrics:** 85% search success rate, <1s search response time
|
|
411
|
+
|
|
412
|
+
#### US-SEARCH-001: Intelligent Search Implementation
|
|
413
|
+
**Priority:** Medium | **Points:** 8 | **Sprint:** 8
|
|
414
|
+
|
|
415
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
416
|
+
As a user with lots of content in the platform
|
|
417
|
+
I want to search intelligently across all my data
|
|
418
|
+
So that I can quickly find exactly what I'm looking for
|
|
419
|
+
|
|
420
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
421
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
422
|
+
Scenario: Basic Text Search
|
|
423
|
+
Given I have content in the platform
|
|
424
|
+
When I enter a search query
|
|
425
|
+
Then I should see relevant results within 1 second
|
|
426
|
+
And results should be ranked by relevance
|
|
427
|
+
And I should see search result snippets
|
|
428
|
+
And I should be able to filter results by type
|
|
429
|
+
|
|
430
|
+
Scenario: Advanced Search Features
|
|
431
|
+
Given I want to perform a complex search
|
|
432
|
+
When I use advanced search options
|
|
433
|
+
Then I should be able to search by date range
|
|
434
|
+
And I should be able to search by specific fields
|
|
435
|
+
And I should be able to use boolean operators
|
|
436
|
+
And I should be able to save search queries
|
|
437
|
+
|
|
438
|
+
Scenario: Search Auto-completion
|
|
439
|
+
Given I am typing in the search box
|
|
440
|
+
When I start typing a query
|
|
441
|
+
Then I should see auto-complete suggestions
|
|
442
|
+
And suggestions should update in real-time
|
|
443
|
+
And I should be able to select suggestions with keyboard
|
|
444
|
+
And recent searches should appear in suggestions
|
|
445
|
+
```
|
|
446
|
+
|
|
447
|
+
---
|
|
448
|
+
|
|
449
|
+
## 🎨 8. User Experience Enhancement Stories
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
### Epic: Accessibility & Usability
|
|
452
|
+
**Business Goal:** Ensure platform is accessible to all users including those with disabilities
|
|
453
|
+
**Success Metrics:** WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, 95% usability test success rate
|
|
454
|
+
|
|
455
|
+
#### US-UX-001: Accessibility Compliance Implementation
|
|
456
|
+
**Priority:** High | **Points:** 13 | **Sprint:** 9-10
|
|
457
|
+
|
|
458
|
+
**User Story:**
|
|
459
|
+
As a user with accessibility needs
|
|
460
|
+
I want the platform to be fully accessible with assistive technologies
|
|
461
|
+
So that I can use all features regardless of my abilities
|
|
462
|
+
|
|
463
|
+
**Acceptance Criteria:**
|
|
464
|
+
```gherkin
|
|
465
|
+
Scenario: Screen Reader Compatibility
|
|
466
|
+
Given I am using a screen reader
|
|
467
|
+
When I navigate through the platform
|
|
468
|
+
Then all content should be properly announced
|
|
469
|
+
And navigation should be logical and predictable
|
|
470
|
+
And form labels should be clearly associated
|
|
471
|
+
And error messages should be announced immediately
|
|
472
|
+
|
|
473
|
+
Scenario: Keyboard Navigation
|
|
474
|
+
Given I am navigating using only the keyboard
|
|
475
|
+
When I move through the interface
|
|
476
|
+
Then all interactive elements should be reachable
|
|
477
|
+
And focus indicators should be clearly visible
|
|
478
|
+
And keyboard shortcuts should work consistently
|
|
479
|
+
And tab order should be logical
|
|
480
|
+
|
|
481
|
+
Scenario: Color and Contrast Accessibility
|
|
482
|
+
Given I have visual impairments
|
|
483
|
+
When I view the platform
|
|
484
|
+
Then color contrast should meet WCAG AA standards
|
|
485
|
+
And information should not rely solely on color
|
|
486
|
+
And text should be resizable up to 200%
|
|
487
|
+
And focus indicators should have sufficient contrast
|
|
488
|
+
```
|
|
489
|
+
|
|
490
|
+
---
|
|
491
|
+
|
|
492
|
+
## 📈 9. Story Metrics & Tracking
|
|
493
|
+
|
|
494
|
+
### 9.1 Story Lifecycle Metrics
|
|
495
|
+
| Metric | Target | Current | Tracking Method |
|
|
496
|
+
|--------|--------|---------|----------------|
|
|
497
|
+
| **Story Completion Rate** | 95% | 92% | Sprint retrospectives |
|
|
498
|
+
| **Average Story Points** | 5 | 6.2 | JIRA tracking |
|
|
499
|
+
| **Stories per Sprint** | 15-20 | 18 | Velocity tracking |
|
|
500
|
+
| **Acceptance Criteria Coverage** | 100% | 98% | QA validation |
|
|
501
|
+
| **Story Refinement Time** | <2 hours | 1.5 hours | Time tracking |
|
|
502
|
+
|
|
503
|
+
### 9.2 Quality Assurance Integration
|
|
504
|
+
**Story Testing Requirements:**
|
|
505
|
+
- Unit tests for all new functionality (90%+ coverage)
|
|
506
|
+
- Integration tests for cross-component features
|
|
507
|
+
- End-to-end tests for complete user workflows
|
|
508
|
+
- Accessibility testing for UI changes
|
|
509
|
+
- Performance testing for data-heavy features
|
|
510
|
+
|
|
511
|
+
**Definition of Done Checklist:**
|
|
512
|
+
- [ ] All acceptance criteria met and verified
|
|
513
|
+
- [ ] Code review completed and approved
|
|
514
|
+
- [ ] Unit tests written and passing
|
|
515
|
+
- [ ] Integration tests passing
|
|
516
|
+
- [ ] Manual testing completed
|
|
517
|
+
- [ ] Accessibility requirements verified
|
|
518
|
+
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
|
|
519
|
+
- [ ] Documentation updated
|
|
520
|
+
- [ ] Product owner acceptance obtained
|
|
521
|
+
|
|
522
|
+
### 9.3 Story Estimation Guidelines
|
|
523
|
+
**Fibonacci Scale Reference:**
|
|
524
|
+
- **1 Point:** Simple configuration change or copy update
|
|
525
|
+
- **2 Points:** Basic form field addition or minor UI tweak
|
|
526
|
+
- **3 Points:** New page with basic functionality
|
|
527
|
+
- **5 Points:** Complex form with validation and integrations
|
|
528
|
+
- **8 Points:** New feature with multiple components
|
|
529
|
+
- **13 Points:** Major feature requiring architecture changes
|
|
530
|
+
|
|
531
|
+
**Estimation Factors:**
|
|
532
|
+
- Complexity of business logic
|
|
533
|
+
- Number of integration points
|
|
534
|
+
- UI/UX complexity
|
|
535
|
+
- Testing requirements
|
|
536
|
+
- Risk and uncertainty level
|
|
537
|
+
|
|
538
|
+
---
|
|
539
|
+
|
|
540
|
+
## 🔄 10. Story Refinement Process
|
|
541
|
+
|
|
542
|
+
### 10.1 Backlog Grooming Workflow
|
|
543
|
+
**Weekly Refinement Schedule:**
|
|
544
|
+
- **Monday:** Epic breakdown and story creation
|
|
545
|
+
- **Wednesday:** Story detail refinement and acceptance criteria
|
|
546
|
+
- **Friday:** Estimation and sprint planning preparation
|
|
547
|
+
|
|
548
|
+
**Refinement Activities:**
|
|
549
|
+
1. **Story Splitting:** Break large stories into deliverable chunks
|
|
550
|
+
2. **Acceptance Criteria Definition:** Clear, testable requirements
|
|
551
|
+
3. **Dependency Identification:** Prerequisites and blockers
|
|
552
|
+
4. **Risk Assessment:** Technical and business risks
|
|
553
|
+
5. **Estimation:** Team-based story point assignment
|
|
554
|
+
|
|
555
|
+
### 10.2 Story Template Validation
|
|
556
|
+
**Quality Checklist:**
|
|
557
|
+
- [ ] User persona clearly identified
|
|
558
|
+
- [ ] Business value articulated
|
|
559
|
+
- [ ] Acceptance criteria follow Given/When/Then format
|
|
560
|
+
- [ ] Story is independent and testable
|
|
561
|
+
- [ ] Appropriate size for single sprint
|
|
562
|
+
- [ ] Dependencies documented
|
|
563
|
+
- [ ] Non-functional requirements specified
|
|
564
|
+
|
|
565
|
+
### 10.3 Continuous Improvement
|
|
566
|
+
**Story Retrospective Questions:**
|
|
567
|
+
- Which stories took longer than estimated and why?
|
|
568
|
+
- Were acceptance criteria clear and complete?
|
|
569
|
+
- What caused rework or story rejection?
|
|
570
|
+
- How can we improve story definition quality?
|
|
571
|
+
- Are we maintaining consistent velocity?
|
|
572
|
+
|
|
573
|
+
---
|
|
574
|
+
|
|
575
|
+
**📝 User Story Success Metrics:**
|
|
576
|
+
- Story completion rate: 95%+
|
|
577
|
+
- Estimation accuracy: ±20%
|
|
578
|
+
- Acceptance criteria clarity: 100% testable
|
|
579
|
+
- Defect rate: <5% per story
|
|
580
|
+
- Team satisfaction: 8.5+/10
|
|
581
|
+
|
|
582
|
+
**Next Steps:** Transform user stories into detailed acceptance criteria (11_acceptance_criteria.md) and break down into development tasks (03_generate_tasks.md).
|