@intentsolutions/blueprint 2.0.0 → 2.1.0

package/templates/core/12_qa_gate.md

@@ -0,0 +1,737 @@
+# 🛡️ Quality Assurance Gate & Release Readiness Framework
+
+**Metadata**
+- Last Updated: {{DATE}}
+- Maintainer: AI-Dev Toolkit
+- Related Docs: Consumes 11_acceptance_criteria.md, feeds 18_release_plan.md, 17_test_plan.md
+
+> **🎯 Purpose**
+> Comprehensive quality gate framework ensuring enterprise-grade software quality through multi-layered validation. This framework establishes mandatory quality checkpoints that prevent defects from reaching production while maintaining development velocity.
+
+---
+
+## 🚦 1. Quality Gate Framework & Standards
+
+### 1.1 Quality Gate Hierarchy
+**Gate Levels:**
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Code Commit] --> B[Pre-commit Gate]
+    B --> C[Feature Gate]
+    C --> D[Integration Gate]
+    D --> E[Release Gate]
+    E --> F[Production Gate]
+
+    B --> B1[Static Analysis]
+    B --> B2[Unit Tests]
+    B --> B3[Security Scan]
+
+    C --> C1[Feature Tests]
+    C --> C2[Acceptance Criteria]
+    C --> C3[Code Review]
+
+    D --> D1[Integration Tests]
+    D --> D2[Performance Tests]
+    D --> D3[Compatibility Tests]
+
+    E --> E1[System Tests]
+    E --> E2[Security Audit]
+    E --> E3[Documentation]
+
+    F --> F1[Deployment Tests]
+    F --> F2[Monitoring]
+    F --> F3[Rollback Ready]
+```
+
+### 1.2 Gate Success Criteria
+| Gate Level | Success Threshold | Automated | Manual Review | Escalation Path |
+|------------|------------------|-----------|---------------|-----------------|
+| **Pre-commit** | 100% pass | ✅ | ❌ | Block commit |
+| **Feature** | 95% pass | ✅ | ✅ | Team lead review |
+| **Integration** | 98% pass | ✅ | ✅ | QA manager approval |
+| **Release** | 100% pass | ✅ | ✅ | Release manager sign-off |
+| **Production** | 100% pass | ✅ | ✅ | Emergency rollback |
+
+### 1.3 Quality Metrics Standards
+**Core Quality Metrics:**
+- **Code Coverage:** ≥80% (critical paths 100%)
+- **Defect Density:** <1 bug per 100 lines of code
+- **Security Vulnerabilities:** Zero high/critical issues
+- **Performance Degradation:** <5% from baseline
+- **Documentation Coverage:** 100% public APIs
+
+---
+
+## 🔒 2. Pre-Commit Quality Gate
+
+### 2.1 Static Code Analysis
+**Automated Checks (Must Pass 100%):**
+```yaml
+static_analysis:
+  code_quality:
+    - sonarqube_quality_gate: passed
+    - complexity_score: <10 per function
+    - maintainability_index: >20
+    - code_duplication: <3%
+
+  security_analysis:
+    - sonarqube_security: no_high_issues
+    - dependency_scan: no_vulnerabilities
+    - secrets_detection: no_secrets
+    - license_compliance: approved_only
+
+  style_compliance:
+    - linting_errors: 0
+    - formatting_consistent: true
+    - naming_conventions: enforced
+    - import_organization: standardized
+```
+
+**Quality Checklist:**
+- [ ] **ESLint/TSLint:** Zero errors, warnings under threshold
+- [ ] **Prettier:** Code formatting consistent
+- [ ] **SonarQube:** Quality gate passed
+- [ ] **Dependency Check:** No vulnerable dependencies
+- [ ] **License Scan:** Only approved licenses used
+- [ ] **Secret Detection:** No hardcoded secrets found
+- [ ] **Type Safety:** TypeScript strict mode compliance
+- [ ] **Dead Code:** No unreachable or unused code
+
+### 2.2 Unit Testing Requirements
+**Coverage Thresholds:**
+```javascript
+// Jest configuration example
+module.exports = {
+  coverageThreshold: {
+    global: {
+      branches: 80,
+      functions: 85,
+      lines: 80,
+      statements: 80
+    },
+    './src/critical-modules/': {
+      branches: 100,
+      functions: 100,
+      lines: 100,
+      statements: 100
+    }
+  }
+};
+```
+
+**Unit Test Quality Standards:**
+- [ ] **Coverage Target:** ≥80% overall, 100% for critical paths
+- [ ] **Test Quality:** Each test validates single responsibility
+- [ ] **Mock Strategy:** External dependencies properly mocked
+- [ ] **Edge Cases:** Boundary conditions tested
+- [ ] **Error Handling:** Exception scenarios covered
+- [ ] **Performance:** Test suite runs in <60 seconds
+- [ ] **Deterministic:** Tests pass consistently (no flaky tests)
+- [ ] **Documentation:** Complex test scenarios documented
+
+### 2.3 Pre-commit Hook Configuration
+```bash
+#!/bin/sh
+# .pre-commit-hook example
+
+# Run static analysis
+npm run lint:check || exit 1
+npm run type:check || exit 1
+npm run format:check || exit 1
+
+# Run unit tests
+npm run test:unit || exit 1
+
+# Security scan
+npm audit --audit-level high || exit 1
+npm run security:scan || exit 1
+
+# Documentation check
+npm run docs:validate || exit 1
+
+echo "✅ Pre-commit checks passed"
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 3. Feature Quality Gate
+
+### 3.1 Functional Testing Validation
+**Feature Acceptance Criteria:**
+```gherkin
+# Example feature gate validation
+Feature: Feature Quality Gate Validation
+
+  Scenario: All acceptance criteria verified
+    Given a feature has been implemented
+    When the feature gate validation runs
+    Then all acceptance criteria should be verified as passing
+    And manual testing should confirm expected behavior
+    And edge cases should be validated
+    And error handling should be confirmed
+
+  Scenario: Cross-browser compatibility confirmed
+    Given the feature affects user interface
+    When compatibility testing is performed
+    Then the feature should work in Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge
+    And mobile responsiveness should be confirmed
+    And accessibility standards should be met
+    And performance should be acceptable across browsers
+```
+
+**Feature Testing Checklist:**
+- [ ] **Acceptance Criteria:** All scenarios pass
+- [ ] **User Story Validation:** Feature meets stated requirements
+- [ ] **Happy Path Testing:** Core functionality verified
+- [ ] **Error Scenarios:** Exception handling confirmed
+- [ ] **Data Validation:** Input validation working correctly
+- [ ] **UI/UX Review:** Design specifications met
+- [ ] **Accessibility:** WCAG 2.1 AA compliance verified
+- [ ] **Mobile Compatibility:** Responsive design confirmed
+
+### 3.2 Code Review Standards
+**Mandatory Review Checklist:**
+```markdown
+## Code Review Checklist
+
+### Functionality
+- [ ] Code implements requirements correctly
+- [ ] Edge cases are handled appropriately
+- [ ] Error handling is comprehensive
+- [ ] Performance implications considered
+
+### Code Quality
+- [ ] Code is readable and maintainable
+- [ ] Functions have single responsibility
+- [ ] Naming conventions followed
+- [ ] Comments explain complex logic
+
+### Security
+- [ ] No sensitive data exposed
+- [ ] Input validation implemented
+- [ ] Authentication/authorization correct
+- [ ] SQL injection prevention in place
+
+### Testing
+- [ ] Adequate test coverage provided
+- [ ] Tests are meaningful and robust
+- [ ] Mock strategies appropriate
+- [ ] Integration points tested
+
+### Documentation
+- [ ] Public APIs documented
+- [ ] Complex algorithms explained
+- [ ] Configuration changes noted
+- [ ] Migration steps provided
+```
+
+**Review Approval Requirements:**
+- Minimum 2 reviewers for critical features
+- At least 1 senior developer approval
+- Security team review for security-related changes
+- Architecture team review for structural changes
+
+### 3.3 Feature Branch Validation
+**Automated Feature Gate Pipeline:**
+```yaml
+# GitHub Actions example
+name: Feature Quality Gate
+
+on:
+  pull_request:
+    branches: [ develop ]
+
+jobs:
+  quality-gate:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+    steps:
+    - name: Checkout code
+      uses: actions/checkout@v3
+
+    - name: Run unit tests
+      run: npm run test:unit:coverage
+
+    - name: Run integration tests
+      run: npm run test:integration
+
+    - name: Security scan
+      run: npm run security:full-scan
+
+    - name: Performance benchmarks
+      run: npm run performance:baseline
+
+    - name: Code quality analysis
+      run: npm run quality:sonar
+
+    - name: Documentation validation
+      run: npm run docs:verify
+
+    - name: Feature gate report
+      run: npm run gate:feature-report
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔗 4. Integration Quality Gate
+
+### 4.1 Integration Testing Framework
+**API Integration Testing:**
+```javascript
+// Example integration test structure
+describe('Payment Integration Tests', () => {
+  beforeAll(async () => {
+    // Setup test database
+    await setupTestDatabase();
+    // Initialize external service mocks
+    await initializeServiceMocks();
+  });
+
+  describe('Stripe Payment Flow', () => {
+    it('should process successful payment end-to-end', async () => {
+      // Test complete payment flow
+      const paymentResult = await processPayment({
+        amount: 2999,
+        currency: 'usd',
+        paymentMethod: 'pm_card_visa'
+      });
+
+      expect(paymentResult.status).toBe('succeeded');
+      expect(paymentResult.amount).toBe(2999);
+
+      // Verify database state
+      const order = await getOrderById(paymentResult.orderId);
+      expect(order.status).toBe('paid');
+    });
+
+    it('should handle payment failures gracefully', async () => {
+      const paymentResult = await processPayment({
+        amount: 2999,
+        currency: 'usd',
+        paymentMethod: 'pm_card_chargeDeclined'
+      });
+
+      expect(paymentResult.status).toBe('requires_payment_method');
+      expect(paymentResult.last_payment_error).toBeDefined();
+    });
+  });
+});
+```
+
+**Integration Test Requirements:**
+- [ ] **API Contracts:** All endpoints validate schema compliance
+- [ ] **Database Interactions:** Data integrity maintained
+- [ ] **External Services:** Third-party integrations working
+- [ ] **Message Queues:** Async processing validated
+- [ ] **File Operations:** Upload/download functionality tested
+- [ ] **Email Services:** Notification delivery confirmed
+- [ ] **Payment Processing:** Financial transactions validated
+- [ ] **Authentication:** SSO and OAuth flows tested
+
+### 4.2 Performance Testing Validation
+**Load Testing Requirements:**
+```yaml
+# K6 performance test configuration
+performance_tests:
+  load_test:
+    virtual_users: 100
+    duration: '10m'
+    thresholds:
+      http_req_duration:
+        - 'p(95)<2000'  # 95% of requests under 2s
+        - 'p(99)<5000'  # 99% of requests under 5s
+      http_req_failed: ['rate<0.01']  # Error rate under 1%
+
+  stress_test:
+    virtual_users: 500
+    duration: '5m'
+    thresholds:
+      http_req_duration: ['p(95)<5000']
+      http_req_failed: ['rate<0.05']
+
+  spike_test:
+    stages:
+      - duration: '1m', target: 100
+      - duration: '30s', target: 500
+      - duration: '1m', target: 100
+```
+
+**Performance Benchmarks:**
+- [ ] **Response Time:** API endpoints <500ms (95th percentile)
+- [ ] **Throughput:** System handles 1000 concurrent users
+- [ ] **Resource Usage:** CPU <70%, Memory <80%
+- [ ] **Database Performance:** Query times <100ms average
+- [ ] **Frontend Performance:** Page load <2 seconds
+- [ ] **Mobile Performance:** Mobile experience <3 seconds
+- [ ] **CDN Performance:** Static assets <500ms globally
+- [ ] **Cache Efficiency:** Cache hit ratio >90%
+
+### 4.3 Security Integration Testing
+**Security Test Suite:**
+```python
+# Example security integration tests
+class SecurityIntegrationTests(unittest.TestCase):
+
+    def test_authentication_required(self):
+        """Test that protected endpoints require authentication"""
+        response = self.client.get('/api/user/profile')
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 401)
+
+    def test_authorization_enforced(self):
+        """Test that users can only access authorized resources"""
+        user_token = self.get_user_token('regular_user')
+        response = self.client.get(
+            '/api/admin/users',
+            headers={'Authorization': f'Bearer {user_token}'}
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 403)
+
+    def test_input_validation(self):
+        """Test that malicious input is properly sanitized"""
+        malicious_input = "<script>alert('xss')</script>"
+        response = self.client.post('/api/comments', json={
+            'content': malicious_input
+        })
+
+        # Verify XSS prevention
+        comment = response.json()
+        self.assertNotIn('<script>', comment['content'])
+
+    def test_sql_injection_prevention(self):
+        """Test that SQL injection attempts are blocked"""
+        malicious_query = "'; DROP TABLE users; --"
+        response = self.client.get(f'/api/search?q={malicious_query}')
+
+        # Should not cause database error
+        self.assertNotEqual(response.status_code, 500)
+```
+
+**Security Gate Requirements:**
+- [ ] **Authentication Testing:** Login flows secure
+- [ ] **Authorization Testing:** Access controls enforced
+- [ ] **Input Validation:** XSS and injection prevention
+- [ ] **Session Management:** Session security verified
+- [ ] **Data Encryption:** Sensitive data protected
+- [ ] **API Security:** Rate limiting and validation
+- [ ] **Infrastructure Security:** Network security tested
+- [ ] **Compliance Validation:** GDPR/SOX requirements met
+
+---
+
+## 🚀 5. Release Quality Gate
+
+### 5.1 System-Level Testing
+**End-to-End Test Suite:**
+```yaml
+# Cypress E2E test configuration
+e2e_tests:
+  user_journeys:
+    - user_registration_flow
+    - login_and_dashboard_access
+    - payment_processing_flow
+    - data_export_functionality
+    - account_settings_management
+
+  cross_browser_testing:
+    browsers: [chrome, firefox, safari, edge]
+    viewports: [desktop, tablet, mobile]
+
+  accessibility_testing:
+    standards: wcag_2_1_aa
+    tools: [axe-core, lighthouse]
+
+  performance_testing:
+    lighthouse_scores:
+      performance: '>90'
+      accessibility: '>95'
+      best_practices: '>90'
+      seo: '>90'
+```
+
+**System Test Requirements:**
+- [ ] **User Journey Testing:** Critical paths work end-to-end
+- [ ] **Cross-Browser Testing:** Functionality across browsers
+- [ ] **Mobile Testing:** Mobile experience validated
+- [ ] **Accessibility Testing:** WCAG compliance verified
+- [ ] **Performance Testing:** Core web vitals met
+- [ ] **SEO Testing:** Search optimization validated
+- [ ] **Backup/Recovery:** Data backup procedures tested
+- [ ] **Disaster Recovery:** System recovery validated
+
+### 5.2 Production Readiness Assessment
+**Infrastructure Validation:**
+```yaml
+# Production readiness checklist
+production_readiness:
+  infrastructure:
+    - monitoring_configured: true
+    - alerting_setup: true
+    - logging_centralized: true
+    - backup_strategy: implemented
+    - scaling_configuration: ready
+    - security_hardening: complete
+
+  deployment:
+    - blue_green_deployment: configured
+    - rollback_procedures: documented
+    - database_migrations: tested
+    - environment_parity: verified
+    - secrets_management: secure
+    - ssl_certificates: valid
+
+  operations:
+    - runbooks_updated: true
+    - on_call_procedures: documented
+    - incident_response: tested
+    - capacity_planning: complete
+    - performance_baselines: established
+    - sla_definitions: agreed
+```
+
+**Production Gate Checklist:**
+- [ ] **Deployment Automation:** CI/CD pipeline tested
+- [ ] **Environment Parity:** Staging matches production
+- [ ] **Database Migrations:** Schema changes validated
+- [ ] **Configuration Management:** Environment variables set
+- [ ] **Monitoring Setup:** Application monitoring active
+- [ ] **Alerting Configuration:** Critical alerts defined
+- [ ] **Log Aggregation:** Centralized logging configured
+- [ ] **Security Hardening:** Production security measures
+
+### 5.3 Release Documentation Requirements
+**Documentation Validation:**
+```markdown
+## Release Documentation Checklist
+
+### User-Facing Documentation
+- [ ] Feature documentation updated
+- [ ] API documentation current
+- [ ] User guides revised
+- [ ] Changelog prepared
+- [ ] Migration guides provided
+
+### Technical Documentation
+- [ ] Architecture diagrams updated
+- [ ] Database schema documented
+- [ ] Configuration changes noted
+- [ ] Deployment procedures updated
+- [ ] Troubleshooting guides current
+
+### Operational Documentation
+- [ ] Runbooks updated
+- [ ] Monitoring procedures documented
+- [ ] Incident response procedures current
+- [ ] Rollback procedures tested
+- [ ] Support procedures updated
+```
+
+---
+
+## 📊 6. Quality Metrics & Monitoring
+
+### 6.1 Real-time Quality Dashboard
+**Quality Metrics Tracking:**
+```yaml
+# Quality metrics configuration
+quality_metrics:
+  code_quality:
+    - technical_debt_ratio: <20%
+    - code_coverage: >80%
+    - duplication_ratio: <3%
+    - maintainability_index: >20
+
+  defect_metrics:
+    - bugs_per_kloc: <1
+    - critical_bugs: 0
+    - security_vulnerabilities: 0
+    - performance_regressions: 0
+
+  process_metrics:
+    - gate_pass_rate: >95%
+    - review_cycle_time: <24h
+    - time_to_production: <2weeks
+    - rollback_frequency: <1%
+```
+
+**Quality Dashboard Components:**
+- **Real-time Gate Status:** Current gate pass/fail rates
+- **Trend Analysis:** Quality metrics over time
+- **Bottleneck Identification:** Gate failure patterns
+- **Team Performance:** Quality metrics by team
+- **Predictive Analytics:** Quality risk assessment
+
+### 6.2 Quality Gate Metrics
+**Gate Performance Tracking:**
+| Gate Level | Success Rate | Avg Duration | Common Failures | Improvement Actions |
+|------------|-------------|--------------|-----------------|-------------------|
+| **Pre-commit** | 95% | 3 minutes | Test failures | Developer training |
+| **Feature** | 92% | 2 hours | Review issues | Review guidelines |
+| **Integration** | 89% | 4 hours | Integration bugs | Test improvements |
+| **Release** | 96% | 8 hours | Documentation | Doc automation |
+| **Production** | 99% | 1 hour | Config issues | Config validation |
+
+### 6.3 Continuous Improvement Framework
+**Quality Gate Optimization:**
+1. **Weekly Gate Review:** Analyze gate failures and bottlenecks
+2. **Monthly Process Review:** Update gate criteria based on feedback
+3. **Quarterly Standards Review:** Evolve quality standards
+4. **Annual Framework Assessment:** Major framework improvements
+
+**Feedback Loop Integration:**
+- Collect feedback from development teams
+- Analyze gate effectiveness metrics
+- Implement process improvements
+- Measure improvement impact
+- Share best practices across teams
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 7. Gate Failure & Escalation Procedures
+
+### 7.1 Gate Failure Response
+**Immediate Actions:**
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    A[Gate Failure Detected] --> B{Severity Assessment}
+    B -->|Critical| C[Immediate Escalation]
+    B -->|High| D[Team Lead Notification]
+    B -->|Medium| E[Developer Notification]
+    B -->|Low| F[Automated Retry]
+
+    C --> G[Release Manager Review]
+    D --> H[24h Resolution SLA]
+    E --> I[48h Resolution SLA]
+    F --> J[Auto-resolve or escalate]
+
+    G --> K[Go/No-Go Decision]
+    H --> L[Root Cause Analysis]
+    I --> L
+    J --> L
+```
+
+**Escalation Matrix:**
+| Failure Type | Severity | Response Time | Escalation Path | Resolution SLA |
+|--------------|----------|---------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **Security Critical** | P0 | Immediate | CISO → CTO | 4 hours |
+| **Production Blocker** | P1 | 15 minutes | Release Manager | 24 hours |
+| **Feature Incomplete** | P2 | 1 hour | Team Lead | 48 hours |
+| **Documentation Gap** | P3 | 4 hours | Tech Writer | 1 week |
+
+### 7.2 Gate Override Procedures
+**Emergency Override Process:**
+```yaml
+# Override authorization levels
+gate_override:
+  pre_commit:
+    authorization: team_lead
+    documentation: required
+    post_override_action: immediate_fix
+
+  feature:
+    authorization: engineering_manager
+    documentation: detailed_justification
+    post_override_action: technical_debt_tracking
+
+  integration:
+    authorization: qa_manager + release_manager
+    documentation: risk_assessment
+    post_override_action: expedited_fix_timeline
+
+  release:
+    authorization: cto_approval
+    documentation: business_justification
+    post_override_action: immediate_hotfix_plan
+
+  production:
+    authorization: incident_commander
+    documentation: incident_report
+    post_override_action: post_mortem_required
+```
+
+**Override Documentation Requirements:**
+- **Business Justification:** Why override is necessary
+- **Risk Assessment:** Potential impact of proceeding
+- **Mitigation Plan:** Steps to address issues post-release
+- **Timeline:** When issues will be resolved
+- **Stakeholder Approval:** Required sign-offs obtained
+
+### 7.3 Quality Debt Management
+**Technical Debt Tracking:**
+```javascript
+// Technical debt tracking structure
+const technicalDebt = {
+  id: 'TD-2024-001',
+  type: 'gate_override',
+  severity: 'high',
+  description: 'Security scan bypassed for urgent release',
+  created: '2024-01-15',
+  owner: 'security-team',
+  resolveBy: '2024-01-22',
+  effort: '3 story points',
+  businessImpact: 'potential security vulnerability',
+  resolutionPlan: 'Implement missing security controls',
+  trackingEpic: 'SEC-2024-Q1'
+};
+```
+
+**Debt Resolution Process:**
+1. **Documentation:** All overrides create technical debt tickets
+2. **Prioritization:** Debt prioritized in next sprint planning
+3. **Resolution:** Debt addressed within agreed timeline
+4. **Validation:** Resolution verified through gates
+5. **Closure:** Debt ticket closed with verification
+
+---
+
+## 📈 8. Quality Gate Success Metrics
+
+### 8.1 Key Performance Indicators
+**Gate Effectiveness Metrics:**
+- **Gate Pass Rate:** 95% target across all gates
+- **Defect Escape Rate:** <1% defects reach production
+- **Time to Resolution:** Average gate failure resolution <24h
+- **Process Efficiency:** Gate overhead <10% of development time
+- **Quality Improvement:** 20% YoY defect reduction
+
+### 8.2 Business Impact Metrics
+**Quality Business Value:**
+- **Production Incidents:** 50% reduction in severity 1/2 incidents
+- **Customer Satisfaction:** 95% satisfaction with software quality
+- **Development Velocity:** Maintained while improving quality
+- **Cost of Quality:** <15% of total development cost
+- **Time to Market:** Quality gates improve overall delivery time
+
+### 8.3 Continuous Monitoring
+**Automated Quality Reporting:**
+```yaml
+# Quality monitoring configuration
+quality_monitoring:
+  daily_reports:
+    - gate_pass_rates
+    - active_quality_debt
+    - critical_issues_count
+    - process_efficiency_metrics
+
+  weekly_reports:
+    - quality_trends
+    - team_performance
+    - bottleneck_analysis
+    - improvement_opportunities
+
+  monthly_reports:
+    - quality_scorecard
+    - business_impact_analysis
+    - process_maturity_assessment
+    - strategic_recommendations
+```
+
+---
+
+**🛡️ Quality Gate Success Metrics:**
+- Gate pass rate: 95%+
+- Defect escape rate: <1%
+- Production incident reduction: 50%+
+- Development efficiency: <10% overhead
+- Team satisfaction with quality process: 8.5+/10
+
+**Next Steps:** Implement quality gates across development pipeline and integrate with comprehensive testing strategy (17_test_plan.md) and release planning (18_release_plan.md).