partis-bcr 1.0.8.post1.dev1__py3-none-any.whl → 1.0.9.post1.dev1__py3-none-any.whl

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (95) hide show
  1. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/METADATA +1 -1
  2. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/RECORD +95 -95
  3. test/new-results/get-selection-metrics-new-simu.yaml +1 -1
  4. test/new-results/test.log +2 -2
  5. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu/fasttree/iclust-0/log +4 -4
  6. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu/fasttree/iclust-1/log +4 -4
  7. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu/fasttree/iclust-2/log +1 -1
  8. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu/igh+igk/partition-igh/fasttree/iclust-1/log +3 -3
  9. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu/igh+igl/partition-igl/fasttree/iclust-0/log +1 -1
  10. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/flcount-matrix.svg +107 -107
  11. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/func-non-func-per-drop-log.svg +83 -83
  12. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/func-non-func-per-drop.svg +61 -61
  13. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/paired-seqs-per-seq-after.svg +18 -18
  14. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/paired-seqs-per-seq-before.svg +24 -24
  15. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/pseq-matrix.svg +35 -35
  16. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/seqs-per-droplet.svg +22 -22
  17. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-correct-family.svg +45 -45
  18. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-correct.svg +45 -45
  19. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-mispaired.svg +45 -45
  20. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-multiple.svg +15 -15
  21. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-near-family.svg +15 -15
  22. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-total.svg +47 -47
  23. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance-unpaired.svg +48 -48
  24. test/paired/new-results/partition-new-simu-annotation-performance/plots/true-pair-clean-performance.svg +27 -27
  25. test/paired/new-results/run-times.csv +6 -6
  26. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/isub-0/partition.log +6 -6
  27. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/isub-1/partition.log +5 -5
  28. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/merged-partition.log +3 -3
  29. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/merged-subsets/parameters/igh/sw-cache.yaml +1 -1
  30. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/merged-subsets/parameters/igk/sw-cache.yaml +1 -1
  31. test/paired/new-results/subset-partition-new-simu/merged-subsets/parameters/igl/sw-cache.yaml +1 -1
  32. test/paired/new-results/test.log +33 -33
  33. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/log +187 -151
  34. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.ckp.gz +0 -0
  35. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.iqtree +34 -34
  36. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.log +187 -151
  37. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.model.gz +0 -0
  38. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.state +2820 -2820
  39. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.treefile +1 -1
  40. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/log +166 -207
  41. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.ckp.gz +0 -0
  42. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.iqtree +151 -151
  43. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.log +166 -207
  44. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.model.gz +0 -0
  45. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.state +740 -740
  46. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-1/out.treefile +1 -1
  47. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/log +134 -135
  48. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.ckp.gz +0 -0
  49. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.iqtree +17 -17
  50. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.log +134 -135
  51. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.model.gz +0 -0
  52. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.state +763 -763
  53. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-2/out.treefile +1 -1
  54. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree-annotations.yaml +1 -1
  55. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralProbs +30 -30
  56. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralStates +7 -7
  57. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralTree +1 -1
  58. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestModel +1 -1
  59. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTree +1 -1
  60. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTreeCollapsed +1 -1
  61. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.log +87 -87
  62. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.mlTrees +20 -20
  63. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa.raxml.startTree +20 -20
  64. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-0/log +198 -197
  65. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralTree +1 -1
  66. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTree +1 -1
  67. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTreeCollapsed +1 -1
  68. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.log +54 -54
  69. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.mlTrees +20 -20
  70. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/input-seqs.fa.raxml.startTree +20 -20
  71. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-1/log +112 -112
  72. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralProbs +22 -22
  73. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralStates +6 -6
  74. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.ancestralTree +1 -1
  75. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestModel +1 -1
  76. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTree +1 -1
  77. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.bestTreeCollapsed +1 -1
  78. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.log +84 -84
  79. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.mlTrees +20 -20
  80. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/input-seqs.fa.raxml.startTree +20 -20
  81. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml/iclust-2/log +182 -182
  82. test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/raxml-annotations.yaml +1 -1
  83. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/cf-alleles.py +0 -0
  84. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/cf-germlines.py +0 -0
  85. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/compare-plotdirs.py +0 -0
  86. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/extract-pairing-info.py +0 -0
  87. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/gctree-run.py +0 -0
  88. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/get-naive-probabilities.py +0 -0
  89. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/parse-output.py +0 -0
  90. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/partis-test.py +0 -0
  91. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.data → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.data}/scripts/split-loci.py +0 -0
  92. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/WHEEL +0 -0
  93. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/entry_points.txt +0 -0
  94. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/licenses/COPYING +0 -0
  95. {partis_bcr-1.0.8.post1.dev1.dist-info → partis_bcr-1.0.9.post1.dev1.dist-info}/top_level.txt +0 -0
@@ -5,22 +5,22 @@ Olga Chernomor, Michael Woodhams, Diep Thi Hoang, Heiko Schmidt
5
5
 
6
6
  Host: pkrvmubgrv54qmi (AVX2, FMA3, 15 GB RAM)
7
7
  Command: /home/runner/work/partis/partis/bin/iqtree3_intel -asr -s /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa -pre /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out -o XnaiveX
8
- Seed: 580837 (Using SPRNG - Scalable Parallel Random Number Generator)
9
- Time: Sat Aug 16 23:08:16 2025
8
+ Seed: 769287 (Using SPRNG - Scalable Parallel Random Number Generator)
9
+ Time: Mon Aug 18 15:31:52 2025
10
10
  Kernel: AVX+FMA - 1 threads (4 CPU cores detected)
11
11
 
12
12
  HINT: Use -nt option to specify number of threads because your CPU has 4 cores!
13
13
  HINT: -nt AUTO will automatically determine the best number of threads to use.
14
14
 
15
15
  Reading alignment file /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/input-seqs.fa ... Fasta format detected
16
- Reading fasta file: done in 0.000107562 secs using 59.5% CPU
16
+ Reading fasta file: done in 0.000109043 secs using 65.11% CPU
17
17
  Alignment most likely contains DNA/RNA sequences
18
- Constructing alignment: done in 0.000288013 secs using 60.07% CPU
18
+ Constructing alignment: done in 0.000357497 secs using 99.58% CPU
19
19
  WARNING: 6 sites contain only gaps or ambiguous characters.
20
20
  Alignment has 12 sequences with 352 columns, 29 distinct patterns
21
21
  8 parsimony-informative, 20 singleton sites, 324 constant sites
22
22
  Gap/Ambiguity Composition p-value
23
- Analyzing sequences: done in 5.541e-06 secs using 54.14% CPU
23
+ Analyzing sequences: done in 9.517e-06 secs using 84.06% CPU
24
24
  1 XnaiveX 1.70% passed 99.41%
25
25
  2 18f4019708 1.70% passed 99.75%
26
26
  3 308de1d739 1.70% passed 98.96%
@@ -40,16 +40,16 @@ Create initial parsimony tree by phylogenetic likelihood library (PLL)... 0.000
40
40
  Perform fast likelihood tree search using GTR+I+G model...
41
41
  Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 5.000)
42
42
  Perform nearest neighbor interchange...
43
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000604378 secs
43
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000540719 secs using 84.33% CPU
44
44
  Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 1.000)
45
45
  1. Initial log-likelihood: -663.729
46
46
  Optimal log-likelihood: -663.717
47
- Rate parameters: A-C: 0.93501 A-G: 0.93474 A-T: 0.45114 C-G: 0.67930 C-T: 0.80175 G-T: 1.00000
47
+ Rate parameters: A-C: 0.93502 A-G: 0.93475 A-T: 0.45115 C-G: 0.67930 C-T: 0.80175 G-T: 1.00000
48
48
  Base frequencies: A: 0.222 C: 0.257 G: 0.308 T: 0.213
49
49
  Proportion of invariable sites: 0.455
50
50
  Gamma shape alpha: 998.447
51
51
  Parameters optimization took 1 rounds (0.001 sec)
52
- Time for fast ML tree search: 0.004 seconds
52
+ Time for fast ML tree search: 0.003 seconds
53
53
 
54
54
  NOTE: ModelFinder requires 0 MB RAM!
55
55
  ModelFinder will test up to 968 DNA models (sample size: 352 epsilon: 0.100) ...
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ ModelFinder will test up to 968 DNA models (sample size: 352 epsilon: 0.100) ...
57
57
  1 JC 667.319 21 1376.639 1379.439 1457.775
58
58
  2 JC+I 667.319 22 1378.639 1381.715 1463.639
59
59
  3 JC+G4 667.320 22 1378.641 1381.717 1463.640
60
- 4 JC+I+G4 668.194 23 1382.388 1385.754 1471.251
60
+ 4 JC+I+G4 668.194 23 1382.388 1385.753 1471.251
61
61
  5 JC+R2 667.320 23 1380.640 1384.006 1469.503
62
62
  6 JC+R3 667.320 25 1384.639 1388.627 1481.230
63
63
  14 JC+I+R2 668.203 24 1384.405 1388.075 1477.133
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ ModelFinder will test up to 968 DNA models (sample size: 352 epsilon: 0.100) ...
101
101
  287 K3P 666.838 23 1379.676 1383.042 1468.539
102
102
  288 K3P+I 666.838 24 1381.676 1385.345 1474.403
103
103
  289 K3P+G4 666.839 24 1381.677 1385.347 1474.405
104
- 309 K3Pu 666.838 23 1379.676 1383.042 1468.539
104
+ 309 K3Pu 666.838 23 1379.676 1383.041 1468.539
105
105
  310 K3Pu+I 666.838 24 1381.676 1385.345 1474.403
106
106
  311 K3Pu+G4 666.839 24 1381.677 1385.347 1474.404
107
107
  331 K3Pu+F 662.995 26 1377.990 1382.310 1478.445
@@ -132,12 +132,12 @@ ModelFinder will test up to 968 DNA models (sample size: 352 epsilon: 0.100) ...
132
132
  508 TPM3u+F+I 663.499 27 1380.998 1385.664 1485.316
133
133
  509 TPM3u+F+G4 663.500 27 1380.999 1385.666 1485.317
134
134
  529 TIMe 666.740 24 1381.481 1385.150 1474.208
135
- 530 TIMe+I 666.740 25 1383.481 1387.468 1480.071
135
+ 530 TIMe+I 666.740 25 1383.480 1387.468 1480.071
136
136
  531 TIMe+G4 666.741 25 1383.482 1387.470 1480.073
137
137
  551 TIMe 666.740 24 1381.481 1385.150 1474.208
138
- 552 TIMe+I 666.740 25 1383.481 1387.468 1480.071
138
+ 552 TIMe+I 666.740 25 1383.480 1387.468 1480.071
139
139
  553 TIMe+G4 666.741 25 1383.482 1387.470 1480.073
140
- 573 TIM 666.740 24 1381.481 1385.150 1474.208
140
+ 573 TIM 666.740 24 1381.480 1385.150 1474.208
141
141
  574 TIM+I 666.740 25 1383.480 1387.468 1480.071
142
142
  575 TIM+G4 666.741 25 1383.482 1387.470 1480.073
143
143
  595 TIM+F 662.954 27 1379.909 1384.575 1484.227
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ ModelFinder will test up to 968 DNA models (sample size: 352 epsilon: 0.100) ...
188
188
  925 GTR 666.396 26 1384.792 1389.112 1485.247
189
189
  926 GTR+I 666.396 27 1386.792 1391.459 1491.110
190
190
  927 GTR+G4 666.397 27 1386.794 1391.461 1491.112
191
- 947 GTR+F 662.829 29 1383.659 1389.063 1495.704
191
+ 947 GTR+F 662.829 29 1383.659 1389.062 1495.704
192
192
  948 GTR+F+I 662.829 30 1385.659 1391.453 1501.568
193
193
  949 GTR+F+G4 662.830 30 1385.660 1391.455 1501.569
194
194
  Akaike Information Criterion: F81+F
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ Bayesian Information Criterion: JC
197
197
  Best-fit model: JC chosen according to BIC
198
198
 
199
199
  All model information printed to /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.model.gz
200
- CPU time for ModelFinder: 0.120 seconds (0h:0m:0s)
200
+ CPU time for ModelFinder: 0.121 seconds (0h:0m:0s)
201
201
  Wall-clock time for ModelFinder: 0.131 seconds (0h:0m:0s)
202
202
 
203
203
  NOTE: 0 MB RAM (0 GB) is required!
@@ -209,11 +209,11 @@ Base frequencies: A: 0.250 C: 0.250 G: 0.250 T: 0.250
209
209
  Parameters optimization took 1 rounds (0.000 sec)
210
210
  Wrote distance file to...
211
211
  Computing ML distances based on estimated model parameters...
212
- Calculating distance matrix: done in 0.000415974 secs using 95.44% CPU
213
- Computing ML distances took 0.000445 sec (of wall-clock time) 0.000430 sec (of CPU time)
214
- Setting up auxiliary I and S matrices: done in 3.6279e-05 secs using 96.47% CPU
215
- Constructing RapidNJ tree: done in 5.6416e-05 secs using 97.49% CPU
216
- Computing RapidNJ tree took 0.000115 sec (of wall-clock time) 0.000115 sec (of CPU time)
212
+ Calculating distance matrix: done in 0.000403323 secs using 98.68% CPU
213
+ Computing ML distances took 0.000429 sec (of wall-clock time) 0.000428 sec (of CPU time)
214
+ Setting up auxiliary I and S matrices: done in 3.3001e-05 secs using 96.97% CPU
215
+ Constructing RapidNJ tree: done in 5.6235e-05 secs using 97.8% CPU
216
+ Computing RapidNJ tree took 0.000111 sec (of wall-clock time) 0.000111 sec (of CPU time)
217
217
  Log-likelihood of RapidNJ tree: -667.322
218
218
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
219
219
  | INITIALIZING CANDIDATE TREE SET |
@@ -223,33 +223,29 @@ Computing log-likelihood of 98 initial trees ... 0.021 seconds
223
223
  Current best score: -667.319
224
224
 
225
225
  Do NNI search on 20 best initial trees
226
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000608887 secs using 94.27% CPU
226
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000583208 secs using 99.79% CPU
227
227
  Estimate model parameters (epsilon = 0.100)
228
228
  BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 1: -667.319
229
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000595683 secs using 98.37% CPU
230
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000607454 secs
231
- BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 3: -667.319
232
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000607845 secs using 65.64% CPU
233
- BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 4: -667.319
234
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000580934 secs using 99.67% CPU
235
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000583148 secs using 96.54% CPU
236
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000633383 secs
237
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000584451 secs using 67.93% CPU
238
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000567198 secs using 93.27% CPU
239
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000575274 secs using 99.78% CPU
229
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00058908 secs using 99.65% CPU
230
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000594609 secs using 99.73% CPU
231
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000607925 secs using 99.68% CPU
232
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000597635 secs using 99.73% CPU
233
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000564944 secs using 99.83% CPU
234
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000588819 secs using 99.86% CPU
235
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00055219 secs using 99.78% CPU
236
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000561248 secs using 99.78% CPU
237
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000552591 secs using 99.71% CPU
240
238
  Iteration 10 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s
241
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00060517 secs using 99.81% CPU
242
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000586796 secs using 99.86% CPU
243
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000563982 secs using 99.83% CPU
244
- BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 13: -667.319
245
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000541149 secs using 99.79% CPU
246
- BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 14: -667.319
247
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000550627 secs
248
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000536621 secs using 41% CPU
249
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000570264 secs using 99.78% CPU
250
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000611872 secs using 99.69% CPU
251
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000581445 secs using 97% CPU
252
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000601262 secs using 99.79% CPU
239
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000575605 secs
240
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000551479 secs using 50.95% CPU
241
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000585352 secs using 99.77% CPU
242
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000569011 secs using 99.82% CPU
243
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000559384 secs using 99.75% CPU
244
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000576917 secs using 99.67% CPU
245
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000569773 secs using 99.69% CPU
246
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000561728 secs using 99.87% CPU
247
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000567829 secs using 99.68% CPU
248
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000548704 secs using 99.87% CPU
253
249
  Iteration 20 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s
254
250
  Finish initializing candidate tree set (20)
255
251
  Current best tree score: -667.319 / CPU time: 0.059
@@ -257,111 +253,151 @@ Number of iterations: 20
257
253
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
258
254
  | OPTIMIZING CANDIDATE TREE SET |
259
255
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
260
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00134074 secs using 99.35% CPU
261
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000758749 secs using 99.11% CPU
262
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000368644 secs using 99.28% CPU
263
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00118484 secs using 99.93% CPU
264
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000346834 secs using 99.76% CPU
265
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00117798 secs using 99.92% CPU
266
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000798614 secs using 99.67% CPU
267
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00035576 secs using 99.79% CPU
268
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000346773 secs using 99.78% CPU
269
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000790299 secs using 99.84% CPU
256
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00195848 secs using 75.11% CPU
257
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00184058 secs using 99.97% CPU
258
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00124317 secs using 99.91% CPU
259
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00102045 secs using 1.568% CPU
260
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00206472 secs using 99.92% CPU
261
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00116884 secs using 99.93% CPU
262
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00120539 secs using 99.88% CPU
263
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00116312 secs using 99.9% CPU
264
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0013657 secs using 99.95% CPU
265
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00120381 secs using 99.93% CPU
270
266
  Iteration 30 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
271
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000343177 secs using 99.66% CPU
272
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000714375 secs using 99.81% CPU
273
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00106988 secs using 99.92% CPU
274
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000829973 secs using 99.88% CPU
275
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000333128 secs using 99.66% CPU
276
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000788896 secs
277
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000364797 secs using 84.16% CPU
278
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00119208 secs using 99.83% CPU
279
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00075415 secs using 99.85% CPU
280
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000856874 secs
281
- Iteration 40 / LogL: -667.321 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
282
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000758088 secs using 43.66% CPU
283
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000691823 secs using 96.41% CPU
284
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000343397 secs using 99.59% CPU
285
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00147757 secs using 99.96% CPU
286
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00105325 secs using 99.88% CPU
287
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000789788 secs using 99.9% CPU
288
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000745214 secs using 99.84% CPU
289
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000802211 secs using 99.85% CPU
290
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000730427 secs using 99.94% CPU
291
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000763078 secs using 99.99% CPU
292
- Iteration 50 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
293
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00090765 secs using 99.82% CPU
294
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000344679 secs using 99.8% CPU
295
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000882542 secs using 99.94% CPU
296
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0016301 secs using 38.71% CPU
297
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000741506 secs using 99.93% CPU
298
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00078036 secs using 99.83% CPU
299
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00090244 secs using 99.84% CPU
300
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000764611 secs using 99.79% CPU
301
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000351702 secs using 99.8% CPU
302
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000375086 secs using 99.71% CPU
303
- Iteration 60 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
304
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00070603 secs using 99.85% CPU
305
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000756785 secs using 99.9% CPU
306
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0007115 secs using 99.93% CPU
307
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000730345 secs using 99.82% CPU
308
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000788084 secs using 99.99% CPU
309
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000845403 secs using 99.83% CPU
310
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000362984 secs using 99.73% CPU
311
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00156261 secs using 99.9% CPU
312
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000876562 secs
313
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000346553 secs using 92.63% CPU
267
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00163443 secs using 98.99% CPU
268
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000440923 secs using 99.56% CPU
269
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000354081 secs using 99.69% CPU
270
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000392342 secs using 99.66% CPU
271
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000735252 secs using 99.83% CPU
272
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000724742 secs
273
+ BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 36: -667.319
274
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000843564 secs using 59.51% CPU
275
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000363658 secs using 99.82% CPU
276
+ UPDATE BEST LOG-LIKELIHOOD: -667.319
277
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00102759 secs
278
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000350463 secs
279
+ Iteration 40 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
280
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000909116 secs using 99.77% CPU
281
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000884531 secs
282
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000752103 secs using 99.85% CPU
283
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000808028 secs using 99.87% CPU
284
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00093791 secs using 99.9% CPU
285
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00133528 secs using 99.9% CPU
286
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0008036 secs using 99.93% CPU
287
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000281736 secs using 99.74% CPU
288
+ BETTER TREE FOUND at iteration 48: -667.319
289
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000925968 secs
290
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00109964 secs using 94.49% CPU
291
+ Iteration 50 / LogL: -687.190 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
292
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00153726 secs using 99.92% CPU
293
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00123191 secs using 99.93% CPU
294
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00168443 secs using 44.47% CPU
295
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000368046 secs using 92.65% CPU
296
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000743046 secs using 99.86% CPU
297
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0015048 secs using 15.22% CPU
298
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000851769 secs
299
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000348871 secs
300
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000820511 secs using 93.48% CPU
301
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00121983 secs using 99.93% CPU
302
+ Iteration 60 / LogL: -667.321 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
303
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000360823 secs using 99.77% CPU
304
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000878509 secs using 99.83% CPU
305
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000795814 secs using 99.9% CPU
306
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00127491 secs using 99.07% CPU
307
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000361325 secs using 99.63% CPU
308
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000816143 secs using 99.86% CPU
309
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000805203 secs using 99.85% CPU
310
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00136598 secs using 99.86% CPU
311
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000345034 secs using 99.7% CPU
312
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000383516 secs using 99.6% CPU
314
313
  Iteration 70 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
315
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000326074 secs using 92.92% CPU
316
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00118572 secs using 99.77% CPU
317
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00080144 secs
318
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000655575 secs using 14.34% CPU
319
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000726329 secs using 99.95% CPU
320
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000344188 secs
321
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000760743 secs using 43.12% CPU
322
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00153436 secs using 97.3% CPU
323
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00033425 secs using 99.63% CPU
324
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000330071 secs using 99.68% CPU
314
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000344934 secs using 99.73% CPU
315
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000798119 secs using 99.86% CPU
316
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000846299 secs using 99.96% CPU
317
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00109782 secs using 99.93% CPU
318
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000360283 secs using 99.64% CPU
319
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000345605 secs using 99.82% CPU
320
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0003536 secs using 99.83% CPU
321
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0008306 secs using 99.81% CPU
322
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0010938 secs
323
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000295702 secs using 14.54% CPU
325
324
  Iteration 80 / LogL: -667.319 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
326
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000486075 secs using 99.78% CPU
327
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000779359 secs using 99.83% CPU
328
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00106454 secs using 99.86% CPU
329
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000331564 secs using 99.53% CPU
330
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000873555 secs using 99.82% CPU
331
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000833079 secs using 99.87% CPU
332
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000726369 secs using 99.81% CPU
333
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00141428 secs using 99.91% CPU
334
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000380376 secs using 99.64% CPU
335
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000736337 secs using 98.73% CPU
325
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.0009166 secs using 99.93% CPU
326
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00034821 secs using 99.94% CPU
327
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000359991 secs using 99.72% CPU
328
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00035398 secs using 99.72% CPU
329
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000372205 secs using 99.68% CPU
330
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00147208 secs using 99.93% CPU
331
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000850837 secs
332
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00072314 secs using 99.84% CPU
333
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000748617 secs using 99.92% CPU
334
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000806736 secs
336
335
  Iteration 90 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
337
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000653691 secs using 99.89% CPU
338
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000725557 secs using 99.79% CPU
339
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000874427 secs using 99.84% CPU
340
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000835223 secs using 99.97% CPU
341
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000680301 secs using 99.96% CPU
342
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000755083 secs using 99.86% CPU
343
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.001132 secs using 11.84% CPU
344
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000330262 secs using 99.62% CPU
345
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000321756 secs using 99.45% CPU
346
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000781652 secs using 99.79% CPU
347
- Iteration 100 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
348
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00089204 secs using 99.88% CPU
349
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00118078 secs using 69.11% CPU
350
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000814935 secs using 44.79% CPU
351
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000769389 secs using 97.35% CPU
352
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00108522 secs using 99.89% CPU
353
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000333828 secs using 98.85% CPU
354
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000667467 secs
355
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000810907 secs
356
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00150203 secs using 85.08% CPU
357
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000785881 secs using 99.89% CPU
358
- Iteration 110 / LogL: -677.602 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
359
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000341403 secs using 99.59% CPU
360
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000831426 secs using 99.83% CPU
361
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000757998 secs using 99.87% CPU
362
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00115071 secs using 13.64% CPU
363
- Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000726449 secs using 99.8% CPU
364
- TREE SEARCH COMPLETED AFTER 115 ITERATIONS / Time: 0h:0m:0s
336
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000876476 secs using 99.83% CPU
337
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000908435 secs using 91.81% CPU
338
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000869823 secs
339
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00122169 secs using 99.94% CPU
340
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000743176 secs using 98.5% CPU
341
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000725324 secs using 99.96% CPU
342
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00125769 secs using 71.48% CPU
343
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000752264 secs
344
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000865786 secs using 40.08% CPU
345
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000896964 secs using 94.65% CPU
346
+ Iteration 100 / LogL: -667.321 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
347
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000809481 secs using 99.82% CPU
348
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000762362 secs using 99.95% CPU
349
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00033809 secs using 99.68% CPU
350
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000764076 secs using 99.86% CPU
351
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000792168 secs using 99.85% CPU
352
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000916651 secs using 99.93% CPU
353
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000726776 secs using 97.55% CPU
354
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000840889 secs using 99.89% CPU
355
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000774024 secs using 100% CPU
356
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000797398 secs using 99.82% CPU
357
+ Iteration 110 / LogL: -681.818 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
358
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000748807 secs using 99.89% CPU
359
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00158208 secs using 99.93% CPU
360
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000308415 secs
361
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000764627 secs using 40.67% CPU
362
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000926338 secs using 94.89% CPU
363
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000768093 secs using 99.86% CPU
364
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000772903 secs using 99.88% CPU
365
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00116591 secs using 99.92% CPU
366
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00122699 secs using 100% CPU
367
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000839707 secs using 99.92% CPU
368
+ Iteration 120 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
369
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000833786 secs using 99.91% CPU
370
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000903987 secs using 100% CPU
371
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000847632 secs using 99.93% CPU
372
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000742114 secs
373
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000843443 secs using 89.4% CPU
374
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00151669 secs using 99.95% CPU
375
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000345975 secs using 99.43% CPU
376
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00160859 secs using 54.52% CPU
377
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00124916 secs using 92.38% CPU
378
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00128647 secs using 99.89% CPU
379
+ Iteration 130 / LogL: -667.321 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
380
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00112329 secs using 97.3% CPU
381
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000811845 secs using 99.9% CPU
382
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000808618 secs using 99.8% CPU
383
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000902333 secs
384
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000832444 secs using 99.95% CPU
385
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00160412 secs using 99.99% CPU
386
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000343622 secs using 97.78% CPU
387
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000795494 secs using 99.94% CPU
388
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00127957 secs using 99.8% CPU
389
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000779094 secs using 99.86% CPU
390
+ Iteration 140 / LogL: -667.320 / Time: 0h:0m:0s (0h:0m:0s left)
391
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000791758 secs using 99.78% CPU
392
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000711467 secs using 99.93% CPU
393
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00133779 secs
394
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000297655 secs using 90.37% CPU
395
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00164192 secs using 99.94% CPU
396
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00125657 secs using 99.88% CPU
397
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000362577 secs using 99.84% CPU
398
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.000813007 secs using 99.88% CPU
399
+ Optimizing NNI: done in 0.00104986 secs using 99.92% CPU
400
+ TREE SEARCH COMPLETED AFTER 149 ITERATIONS / Time: 0h:0m:0s
365
401
 
366
402
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
367
403
  | FINALIZING TREE SEARCH |
@@ -377,11 +413,11 @@ BEST SCORE FOUND : -667.319
377
413
  Ancestral state probabilities printed to /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.state
378
414
  Total tree length: 0.082
379
415
 
380
- Total number of iterations: 115
381
- CPU time used for tree search: 0.140 sec (0h:0m:0s)
382
- Wall-clock time used for tree search: 0.147 sec (0h:0m:0s)
383
- Total CPU time used: 0.274 sec (0h:0m:0s)
384
- Total wall-clock time used: 0.296 sec (0h:0m:0s)
416
+ Total number of iterations: 149
417
+ CPU time used for tree search: 0.181 sec (0h:0m:0s)
418
+ Wall-clock time used for tree search: 0.195 sec (0h:0m:0s)
419
+ Total CPU time used: 0.318 sec (0h:0m:0s)
420
+ Total wall-clock time used: 0.344 sec (0h:0m:0s)
385
421
 
386
422
  Analysis results written to:
387
423
  IQ-TREE report: /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.iqtree
@@ -390,4 +426,4 @@ Analysis results written to:
390
426
  Ancestral state: /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.state
391
427
  Screen log file: /home/runner/work/partis/partis/test/ref-results/partition-new-simu/iqtree/iclust-0/out.log
392
428
 
393
- Date and Time: Sat Aug 16 23:08:16 2025
429
+ Date and Time: Mon Aug 18 15:31:53 2025