bmalph 1.0.0 → 2.2.1

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/test-design/test-design-template.md

@@ -1,294 +0,0 @@
-# Test Design: Epic {epic_num} - {epic_title}
-
-**Date:** {date}
-**Author:** {user_name}
-**Status:** Draft / Approved
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-**Scope:** {design_level} test design for Epic {epic_num}
-
-**Risk Summary:**
-
-- Total risks identified: {total_risks}
-- High-priority risks (≥6): {high_priority_count}
-- Critical categories: {top_categories}
-
-**Coverage Summary:**
-
-- P0 scenarios: {p0_count} ({p0_hours} hours)
-- P1 scenarios: {p1_count} ({p1_hours} hours)
-- P2/P3 scenarios: {p2p3_count} ({p2p3_hours} hours)
-- **Total effort**: {total_hours} hours (~{total_days} days)
-
----
-
-## Risk Assessment
-
-### High-Priority Risks (Score ≥6)
-
-| Risk ID | Category | Description   | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation   | Owner   | Timeline |
-| ------- | -------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------ | ----- | ------------ | ------- | -------- |
-| R-001   | SEC      | {description} | 2           | 3      | 6     | {mitigation} | {owner} | {date}   |
-| R-002   | PERF     | {description} | 3           | 2      | 6     | {mitigation} | {owner} | {date}   |
-
-### Medium-Priority Risks (Score 3-4)
-
-| Risk ID | Category | Description   | Probability | Impact | Score | Mitigation   | Owner   |
-| ------- | -------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------ | ----- | ------------ | ------- |
-| R-003   | TECH     | {description} | 2           | 2      | 4     | {mitigation} | {owner} |
-| R-004   | DATA     | {description} | 1           | 3      | 3     | {mitigation} | {owner} |
-
-### Low-Priority Risks (Score 1-2)
-
-| Risk ID | Category | Description   | Probability | Impact | Score | Action  |
-| ------- | -------- | ------------- | ----------- | ------ | ----- | ------- |
-| R-005   | OPS      | {description} | 1           | 2      | 2     | Monitor |
-| R-006   | BUS      | {description} | 1           | 1      | 1     | Monitor |
-
-### Risk Category Legend
-
-- **TECH**: Technical/Architecture (flaws, integration, scalability)
-- **SEC**: Security (access controls, auth, data exposure)
-- **PERF**: Performance (SLA violations, degradation, resource limits)
-- **DATA**: Data Integrity (loss, corruption, inconsistency)
-- **BUS**: Business Impact (UX harm, logic errors, revenue)
-- **OPS**: Operations (deployment, config, monitoring)
-
----
-
-## Test Coverage Plan
-
-### P0 (Critical) - Run on every commit
-
-**Criteria**: Blocks core journey + High risk (≥6) + No workaround
-
-| Requirement   | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes   |
-| ------------- | ---------- | --------- | ---------- | ----- | ------- |
-| {requirement} | E2E        | R-001     | 3          | QA    | {notes} |
-| {requirement} | API        | R-002     | 5          | QA    | {notes} |
-
-**Total P0**: {p0_count} tests, {p0_hours} hours
-
-### P1 (High) - Run on PR to main
-
-**Criteria**: Important features + Medium risk (3-4) + Common workflows
-
-| Requirement   | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes   |
-| ------------- | ---------- | --------- | ---------- | ----- | ------- |
-| {requirement} | API        | R-003     | 4          | QA    | {notes} |
-| {requirement} | Component  | -         | 6          | DEV   | {notes} |
-
-**Total P1**: {p1_count} tests, {p1_hours} hours
-
-### P2 (Medium) - Run nightly/weekly
-
-**Criteria**: Secondary features + Low risk (1-2) + Edge cases
-
-| Requirement   | Test Level | Risk Link | Test Count | Owner | Notes   |
-| ------------- | ---------- | --------- | ---------- | ----- | ------- |
-| {requirement} | API        | R-004     | 8          | QA    | {notes} |
-| {requirement} | Unit       | -         | 15         | DEV   | {notes} |
-
-**Total P2**: {p2_count} tests, {p2_hours} hours
-
-### P3 (Low) - Run on-demand
-
-**Criteria**: Nice-to-have + Exploratory + Performance benchmarks
-
-| Requirement   | Test Level | Test Count | Owner | Notes   |
-| ------------- | ---------- | ---------- | ----- | ------- |
-| {requirement} | E2E        | 2          | QA    | {notes} |
-| {requirement} | Unit       | 8          | DEV   | {notes} |
-
-**Total P3**: {p3_count} tests, {p3_hours} hours
-
----
-
-## Execution Order
-
-### Smoke Tests (<5 min)
-
-**Purpose**: Fast feedback, catch build-breaking issues
-
-- [ ] {scenario} (30s)
-- [ ] {scenario} (45s)
-- [ ] {scenario} (1min)
-
-**Total**: {smoke_count} scenarios
-
-### P0 Tests (<10 min)
-
-**Purpose**: Critical path validation
-
-- [ ] {scenario} (E2E)
-- [ ] {scenario} (API)
-- [ ] {scenario} (API)
-
-**Total**: {p0_count} scenarios
-
-### P1 Tests (<30 min)
-
-**Purpose**: Important feature coverage
-
-- [ ] {scenario} (API)
-- [ ] {scenario} (Component)
-
-**Total**: {p1_count} scenarios
-
-### P2/P3 Tests (<60 min)
-
-**Purpose**: Full regression coverage
-
-- [ ] {scenario} (Unit)
-- [ ] {scenario} (API)
-
-**Total**: {p2p3_count} scenarios
-
----
-
-## Resource Estimates
-
-### Test Development Effort
-
-| Priority  | Count             | Hours/Test | Total Hours       | Notes                   |
-| --------- | ----------------- | ---------- | ----------------- | ----------------------- |
-| P0        | {p0_count}        | 2.0        | {p0_hours}        | Complex setup, security |
-| P1        | {p1_count}        | 1.0        | {p1_hours}        | Standard coverage       |
-| P2        | {p2_count}        | 0.5        | {p2_hours}        | Simple scenarios        |
-| P3        | {p3_count}        | 0.25       | {p3_hours}        | Exploratory             |
-| **Total** | **{total_count}** | **-**      | **{total_hours}** | **~{total_days} days**  |
-
-### Prerequisites
-
-**Test Data:**
-
-- {factory_name} factory (faker-based, auto-cleanup)
-- {fixture_name} fixture (setup/teardown)
-
-**Tooling:**
-
-- {tool} for {purpose}
-- {tool} for {purpose}
-
-**Environment:**
-
-- {env_requirement}
-- {env_requirement}
-
----
-
-## Quality Gate Criteria
-
-### Pass/Fail Thresholds
-
-- **P0 pass rate**: 100% (no exceptions)
-- **P1 pass rate**: ≥95% (waivers required for failures)
-- **P2/P3 pass rate**: ≥90% (informational)
-- **High-risk mitigations**: 100% complete or approved waivers
-
-### Coverage Targets
-
-- **Critical paths**: ≥80%
-- **Security scenarios**: 100%
-- **Business logic**: ≥70%
-- **Edge cases**: ≥50%
-
-### Non-Negotiable Requirements
-
-- [ ] All P0 tests pass
-- [ ] No high-risk (≥6) items unmitigated
-- [ ] Security tests (SEC category) pass 100%
-- [ ] Performance targets met (PERF category)
-
----
-
-## Mitigation Plans
-
-### R-001: {Risk Description} (Score: 6)
-
-**Mitigation Strategy:** {detailed_mitigation}
-**Owner:** {owner}
-**Timeline:** {date}
-**Status:** Planned / In Progress / Complete
-**Verification:** {how_to_verify}
-
-### R-002: {Risk Description} (Score: 6)
-
-**Mitigation Strategy:** {detailed_mitigation}
-**Owner:** {owner}
-**Timeline:** {date}
-**Status:** Planned / In Progress / Complete
-**Verification:** {how_to_verify}
-
----
-
-## Assumptions and Dependencies
-
-### Assumptions
-
-1. {assumption}
-2. {assumption}
-3. {assumption}
-
-### Dependencies
-
-1. {dependency} - Required by {date}
-2. {dependency} - Required by {date}
-
-### Risks to Plan
-
-- **Risk**: {risk_to_plan}
-  - **Impact**: {impact}
-  - **Contingency**: {contingency}
-
----
-
----
-
-## Follow-on Workflows (Manual)
-
-- Run `*atdd` to generate failing P0 tests (separate workflow; not auto-run).
-- Run `*automate` for broader coverage once implementation exists.
-
----
-
-## Approval
-
-**Test Design Approved By:**
-
-- [ ] Product Manager: {name} Date: {date}
-- [ ] Tech Lead: {name} Date: {date}
-- [ ] QA Lead: {name} Date: {date}
-
-**Comments:**
-
----
-
----
-
----
-
-## Appendix
-
-### Knowledge Base References
-
-- `risk-governance.md` - Risk classification framework
-- `probability-impact.md` - Risk scoring methodology
-- `test-levels-framework.md` - Test level selection
-- `test-priorities-matrix.md` - P0-P3 prioritization
-
-### Related Documents
-
-- PRD: {prd_link}
-- Epic: {epic_link}
-- Architecture: {arch_link}
-- Tech Spec: {tech_spec_link}
-
----
-
-**Generated by**: BMad TEA Agent - Test Architect Module
-**Workflow**: `_bmad/bmm/testarch/test-design`
-**Version**: 4.0 (BMad v6)

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/test-design/workflow.yaml

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
-# Test Architect workflow: test-design
-name: testarch-test-design
-description: "Dual-mode workflow: (1) System-level testability review in Solutioning phase, or (2) Epic-level test planning in Implementation phase. Auto-detects mode based on project phase."
-author: "BMad"
-
-# Critical variables from config
-config_source: "{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/config.yaml"
-output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
-user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
-communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
-document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
-date: system-generated
-
-# Workflow components
-installed_path: "{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/testarch/test-design"
-instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md"
-validation: "{installed_path}/checklist.md"
-# Note: Template selection is mode-based (see instructions.md Step 1.5):
-#   - System-level: test-design-architecture-template.md + test-design-qa-template.md
-#   - Epic-level: test-design-template.md (unchanged)
-template: "{installed_path}/test-design-template.md"
-
-# Variables and inputs
-variables:
-  design_level: "full" # full, targeted, minimal - scope of design effort
-  mode: "auto-detect" # auto-detect (default), system-level, epic-level
-
-# Output configuration
-# Note: Actual output file determined dynamically based on mode detection
-# Declared outputs for new workflow format
-outputs:
-  # System-Level Mode (Phase 3) - TWO documents
-  - id: test-design-architecture
-    description: "System-level test architecture: Architectural concerns, testability gaps, NFR requirements for Architecture/Dev teams"
-    path: "{output_folder}/test-design-architecture.md"
-    mode: system-level
-    audience: architecture
-
-  - id: test-design-qa
-    description: "System-level test design: Test execution recipe, coverage plan, Sprint 0 setup for QA team"
-    path: "{output_folder}/test-design-qa.md"
-    mode: system-level
-    audience: qa
-
-  # Epic-Level Mode (Phase 4) - ONE document (unchanged)
-  - id: epic-level
-    description: "Epic-level test plan (Phase 4)"
-    path: "{output_folder}/test-design-epic-{epic_num}.md"
-    mode: epic-level
-# Note: No default_output_file - mode detection determines which outputs to write
-
-# Required tools
-required_tools:
-  - read_file # Read PRD, epics, stories, architecture docs
-  - write_file # Create test design document
-  - list_files # Find related documentation
-  - search_repo # Search for existing tests and patterns
-
-tags:
-  - qa
-  - planning
-  - test-architect
-  - risk-assessment
-  - coverage
-
-execution_hints:
-  interactive: false # Minimize prompts
-  autonomous: true # Proceed without user input unless blocked
-  iterative: true
-
-web_bundle: false