appiq-solution 1.3.2 → 1.4.2

package/#Tools/APPIQ-METHOD/deployment/build/expansion-packs/bmad-mobile-app-dev/tasks/platform-selection.md

@@ -1,489 +0,0 @@
-# Mobile Platform Selection Task
-
-## Task Overview
-
-This task guides the selection of the optimal mobile development platform (Flutter vs React Native) based on comprehensive analysis of project requirements, team capabilities, and technical constraints.
-
-## Prerequisites
-
-- Project requirements document or brief
-- Team composition and skills assessment
-- Technical constraints and integration requirements
-- Timeline and budget constraints
-
-## Execution Steps
-
-### Phase 1: Requirements Analysis
-
-#### 1.1 Project Scope Assessment
-**Objective:** Define the scope and nature of the mobile application project.
-
-**Questions to Address:**
-```
-Project Type:
-- [ ] New mobile application (greenfield)
-- [ ] Enhancement of existing mobile app (brownfield)
-- [ ] Web-to-mobile expansion
-- [ ] Platform migration project
-- [ ] MVP/prototype development
-- [ ] Enterprise application
-- [ ] Consumer application
-
-Business Context:
-- What is the primary business objective?
-- Who is the target audience?
-- What is the expected user base size?
-- What are the key success metrics?
-- What is the competitive landscape?
-```
-
-#### 1.2 Functional Requirements Analysis
-**Objective:** Catalog all functional requirements and their platform implications.
-
-**Requirements Categories:**
-```
-Core Features:
-- [ ] User authentication and management
-- [ ] Data synchronization and offline support
-- [ ] Real-time communication
-- [ ] Media handling (camera, gallery, videos)
-- [ ] Location services and maps
-- [ ] Push notifications
-- [ ] Social sharing and integration
-- [ ] Payment processing
-- [ ] Analytics and tracking
-
-Advanced Features:
-- [ ] AR/VR capabilities
-- [ ] Machine learning integration
-- [ ] IoT device connectivity
-- [ ] Background processing
-- [ ] Biometric authentication
-- [ ] Hardware sensor access
-- [ ] NFC/Bluetooth integration
-- [ ] Custom native modules
-```
-
-#### 1.3 Non-Functional Requirements
-**Objective:** Define performance, security, and operational requirements.
-
-**Performance Requirements:**
-```
-- App launch time: _____ seconds maximum
-- Screen transition time: _____ milliseconds maximum
-- Memory usage limit: _____ MB
-- Network data usage: _____ optimized/minimal
-- Battery consumption: _____ minimal impact
-- Offline functionality: _____ required/nice-to-have
-```
-
-**Security Requirements:**
-```
-- [ ] Data encryption at rest
-- [ ] Data encryption in transit
-- [ ] API security and authentication
-- [ ] Compliance requirements (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)
-- [ ] Biometric security integration
-- [ ] Certificate pinning
-```
-
-### Phase 2: Team and Resource Assessment
-
-#### 2.1 Team Skill Matrix
-**Objective:** Evaluate current team capabilities and learning capacity.
-
-**Skill Assessment Matrix:**
-```
-Team Member Assessment:
-┌─────────────────┬──────────┬──────────┬────────────┬──────────┐
-│ Technology      │ Expert   │ Intermediate │ Beginner   │ None     │
-├─────────────────┼──────────┼──────────┼────────────┼──────────┤
-│ JavaScript/TS   │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ React           │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ React Native    │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ Dart            │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ Flutter         │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ Mobile UI/UX    │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ Native iOS      │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-│ Native Android  │    ___   │    ___   │     ___    │    ___   │
-└─────────────────┴──────────┴──────────┴────────────┴──────────┘
-
-Team Composition:
-- Total team size: _____
-- Frontend developers: _____
-- Mobile developers: _____
-- Backend developers: _____
-- UI/UX designers: _____
-- QA engineers: _____
-
-Learning Capacity:
-- Time available for training: _____ weeks
-- Team's willingness to learn new technology: High/Medium/Low
-- Previous experience with cross-platform development: Yes/No
-```
-
-#### 2.2 Resource and Timeline Assessment
-**Objective:** Define project constraints and resource availability.
-
-**Project Constraints:**
-```
-Timeline:
-- Project start date: _____
-- Target launch date: _____
-- MVP timeline: _____ months
-- Full feature release: _____ months
-
-Budget:
-- Development budget: $_____
-- Training budget: $_____
-- Tool and license budget: $_____
-- Third-party service budget: $_____
-
-Resource Availability:
-- Dedicated team members: _____
-- Part-time contributors: _____
-- External consultant budget: $_____
-- Access to platform expertise: Yes/No
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Technical Evaluation
-
-#### 3.1 Platform-Specific Feature Requirements
-**Objective:** Identify features that may favor one platform over another.
-
-**Flutter Advantages Assessment:**
-```
-High-Performance UI Requirements:
-- [ ] Complex custom animations
-- [ ] Heavily customized UI components
-- [ ] Pixel-perfect design requirements
-- [ ] 60fps+ animation requirements
-- [ ] Game-like interfaces
-
-Single Codebase Priority:
-- [ ] Desktop app planned (Windows, macOS, Linux)
-- [ ] Web version with shared logic required
-- [ ] Maximum code sharing critical for maintenance
-- [ ] Small team managing multiple platforms
-
-Google Ecosystem Integration:
-- [ ] Firebase heavy usage
-- [ ] Google Cloud Platform integration
-- [ ] Google services integration (Maps, Analytics, etc.)
-- [ ] Material Design strict adherence
-```
-
-**React Native Advantages Assessment:**
-```
-JavaScript Ecosystem Benefits:
-- [ ] Existing React web application
-- [ ] Large JavaScript codebase to share
-- [ ] Team expertise in React patterns
-- [ ] Node.js backend integration
-
-Native Integration Requirements:
-- [ ] Extensive third-party native libraries
-- [ ] Complex native module requirements
-- [ ] Platform-specific UI patterns important
-- [ ] Over-the-air update capability critical
-
-Development Speed Priority:
-- [ ] Rapid prototyping required
-- [ ] Fast time-to-market critical
-- [ ] Iterative development approach
-- [ ] Hot reloading for productivity
-```
-
-#### 3.2 Technical Constraint Analysis
-**Objective:** Evaluate technical limitations and integration requirements.
-
-**Integration Requirements:**
-```
-Existing Systems:
-- [ ] REST API integration: _____ complexity level
-- [ ] GraphQL integration: _____ yes/no
-- [ ] Database: _____ type and complexity
-- [ ] Authentication system: _____ existing/new
-- [ ] Payment gateway: _____ which service
-- [ ] Analytics platform: _____ which service
-- [ ] Push notification service: _____ which service
-
-Third-Party Dependencies:
-- [ ] Specific native libraries required: _____ list
-- [ ] Custom native code needed: _____ yes/no
-- [ ] Hardware integration requirements: _____ list
-- [ ] Compliance with app store requirements: _____ considerations
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Platform Evaluation Matrix
-
-#### 4.1 Scoring Methodology
-**Objective:** Create objective comparison framework.
-
-**Evaluation Criteria and Weights:**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────┬────────┬──────────┬──────────────┬───────────┐
-│ Criteria                │ Weight │ Flutter  │ React Native │ Comments  │
-├─────────────────────────┼────────┼──────────┼──────────────┼───────────┤
-│ Development Speed       │   20%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Performance            │   15%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Team Learning Curve    │   15%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ UI/UX Flexibility     │   10%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Third-party Ecosystem  │   10%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Platform Features      │   10%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Long-term Maintenance  │   10%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Testing Capabilities   │    5%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-│ Deployment Complexity  │    5%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-├─────────────────────────┼────────┼──────────┼──────────────┼───────────┤
-│ TOTAL SCORE            │  100%  │   ___    │     ___      │           │
-└─────────────────────────┴────────┴──────────┴──────────────┴───────────┘
-
-Scoring Scale: 1-5 (1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Very Good, 5=Excellent)
-```
-
-#### 4.2 Detailed Evaluation
-
-**Development Speed Analysis:**
-```
-Flutter:
-+ Hot reload for rapid development
-+ Single codebase for multiple platforms
-+ Rich widget library
-- Learning curve for Dart
-- Initial setup complexity
-
-Score: ___/5
-
-React Native:
-+ Familiar JavaScript/React patterns
-+ Large developer community
-+ Extensive third-party libraries
-+ Fast refresh capability
-- Platform-specific tweaks needed
-
-Score: ___/5
-```
-
-**Performance Analysis:**
-```
-Flutter:
-+ Compiled to native code
-+ Consistent 60fps performance
-+ Efficient widget rendering
-+ Small runtime overhead
-- Larger app size
-
-Score: ___/5
-
-React Native:
-+ Good performance for most use cases
-+ Native component rendering
-+ Optimized for common patterns
-- JavaScript bridge overhead
-- Requires optimization for complex UIs
-
-Score: ___/5
-```
-
-**Continue similar analysis for all criteria...**
-
-### Phase 5: State Management Selection
-
-#### 5.1 State Management Complexity Assessment
-**Objective:** Determine appropriate state management solution based on app complexity.
-
-**Complexity Assessment:**
-```
-Application Complexity Indicators:
-- [ ] Number of screens: _____ (1-5: Simple, 6-15: Medium, 16+: Complex)
-- [ ] User roles and permissions: _____ levels
-- [ ] Data entities: _____ count
-- [ ] Real-time features: _____ count
-- [ ] Offline capabilities: Yes/No
-- [ ] Background processes: _____ count
-- [ ] Third-party integrations: _____ count
-- [ ] Platform-specific features: _____ count
-
-Overall Complexity: Simple/Medium/Complex
-```
-
-#### 5.2 State Management Recommendations
-
-**For Flutter Applications:**
-```
-BLoC/Cubit Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Complex business logic
-- Large development team
-- Extensive testing required
-- Predictable state management needed
-- Enterprise application
-
-Riverpod Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Modern Flutter development
-- Type-safe state management desired
-- Flexible dependency injection needed
-- Medium to large application
-
-GetX Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Rapid development required
-- Simple to medium complexity
-- Small development team
-- Minimal boilerplate preferred
-
-Provider Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Learning Flutter state management
-- Simple application requirements
-- Team new to state management concepts
-```
-
-**For React Native Applications:**
-```
-Redux Toolkit Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Complex state interactions
-- Time-travel debugging needed
-- Large development team
-- Predictable state updates required
-
-Zustand Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Performance-critical application
-- Minimal boilerplate preferred
-- Medium complexity requirements
-- Small bundle size important
-
-Context API Selection Criteria:
-✅ Use when:
-- Simple global state needs
-- Minimal external dependencies
-- Theme/authentication state only
-- Small application scope
-```
-
-### Phase 6: Decision Documentation
-
-#### 6.1 Platform Recommendation Template
-**Objective:** Document the final platform recommendation with detailed rationale.
-
-```markdown
-# Mobile Platform Selection Recommendation
-
-## Executive Summary
-**Recommended Platform:** [Flutter/React Native]
-**Confidence Level:** [High/Medium/Low]
-**Key Decision Factors:** [List top 3 factors]
-
-## Platform Decision Rationale
-
-### Primary Reasons for Selection:
-1. **[Factor 1]:** [Detailed explanation]
-2. **[Factor 2]:** [Detailed explanation]
-3. **[Factor 3]:** [Detailed explanation]
-
-### Evaluation Summary:
-- Flutter Score: ___/100
-- React Native Score: ___/100
-- Score Difference: ___
-- Key Differentiators: [List]
-
-## State Management Recommendation
-**Recommended Solution:** [Specific state management library]
-**Rationale:** [Why this solution fits the project needs]
-
-## Risk Assessment and Mitigation
-
-### Identified Risks:
-1. **[Risk 1]:** [Description and mitigation strategy]
-2. **[Risk 2]:** [Description and mitigation strategy]
-3. **[Risk 3]:** [Description and mitigation strategy]
-
-### Success Factors:
-1. **[Factor 1]:** [How to ensure success]
-2. **[Factor 2]:** [How to ensure success]
-3. **[Factor 3]:** [How to ensure success]
-
-## Implementation Considerations
-
-### Team Preparation:
-- Training required: [Yes/No - Details]
-- Timeline for team preparation: [Duration]
-- External expertise needed: [Yes/No - Details]
-
-### Technical Setup:
-- Development environment setup
-- CI/CD pipeline requirements
-- Testing framework selection
-- Deployment strategy
-
-## Next Steps
-1. [ ] Stakeholder approval
-2. [ ] Team training plan
-3. [ ] Development environment setup
-4. [ ] Architecture documentation
-5. [ ] Project kickoff
-```
-
-## Quality Checkpoints
-
-### Validation Checklist
-- [ ] All requirements considered in evaluation
-- [ ] Team capabilities honestly assessed
-- [ ] Technical constraints adequately analyzed
-- [ ] Scoring methodology consistently applied
-- [ ] Risk factors identified and mitigation planned
-- [ ] Recommendation clearly justified
-- [ ] Implementation path defined
-- [ ] Stakeholder buy-in process planned
-
-### Review Process
-1. **Self-Review:** Verify all sections completed thoroughly
-2. **Peer Review:** Have another team member validate analysis
-3. **Stakeholder Review:** Present to key stakeholders for feedback
-4. **Final Approval:** Obtain formal approval to proceed
-
-## Success Metrics
-
-### Decision Quality Indicators:
-- Alignment with project requirements: ____%
-- Team confidence in selection: ___/10
-- Stakeholder satisfaction: ___/10
-- Technical feasibility score: ___/10
-
-### Process Efficiency Metrics:
-- Time to complete selection: _____ days
-- Number of iterations required: _____
-- Stakeholder alignment achieved: Yes/No
-- Clear implementation path: Yes/No
-
-## Templates and Outputs
-
-This task should produce the following deliverables:
-1. **Platform Evaluation Matrix** - Detailed scoring and comparison
-2. **Platform Recommendation Document** - Executive summary and rationale
-3. **State Management Analysis** - Selected solution with justification
-4. **Risk Assessment** - Identified risks and mitigation strategies
-5. **Implementation Roadmap** - Next steps and timeline
-
-## Common Pitfalls to Avoid
-
-### Decision-Making Traps:
-- **Technology Bias:** Don't choose based on personal preference
-- **Hype-Driven Selection:** Don't follow trends without analysis
-- **Incomplete Analysis:** Don't skip any evaluation criteria
-- **Team Capability Overestimation:** Be realistic about learning curves
-- **Requirement Underestimation:** Don't simplify complex requirements
-
-### Process Issues:
-- **Rushed Decision:** Allow adequate time for thorough analysis
-- **Stakeholder Exclusion:** Involve all key decision-makers
-- **Documentation Gaps:** Document all assumptions and decisions
-- **Risk Ignorance:** Address potential issues proactively
-- **Implementation Disconnect:** Ensure recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-**Note:** This task should be completed collaboratively with key stakeholders and team members. The quality of the final recommendation depends on the thoroughness of the analysis and honesty in assessment of capabilities and constraints.