appiq-solution 1.3.2 → 1.4.2

package/#Tools/APPIQ-METHOD/deployment/build/expansion-packs/bmad-mobile-app-dev/tasks/existing-app-analysis.md

@@ -1,645 +0,0 @@
-# Existing Mobile App Analysis Task
-
-## Task Overview
-
-This task provides comprehensive analysis of existing mobile applications to understand current architecture, identify improvement opportunities, and plan enhancement or migration strategies.
-
-## Prerequisites
-
-- Access to existing mobile application codebase
-- Understanding of current deployment and release processes
-- Access to app analytics and performance data (if available)
-- Documentation of known issues and technical debt
-- Stakeholder context about business goals and user feedback
-
-## Execution Steps
-
-### Phase 1: Initial Assessment
-
-#### 1.1 Application Overview
-**Objective:** Establish baseline understanding of the existing application.
-
-**Basic Information Gathering:**
-```
-Application Details:
-- App name and version: _____
-- Primary platform(s): iOS/Android/Both
-- Development framework: Native iOS/Native Android/Flutter/React Native/Xamarin/Other
-- Current app store ratings: iOS: ___/5, Android: ___/5
-- Download/install count: _____
-- Active user base: _____
-- Target audience: _____
-
-Business Context:
-- Primary business objectives: _____
-- Key revenue streams: _____
-- Competitive positioning: _____
-- Critical success metrics: _____
-- Known user pain points: _____
-```
-
-#### 1.2 Technology Stack Assessment
-**Objective:** Document current technology choices and versions.
-
-**Technology Inventory:**
-```
-Platform Details:
-- iOS minimum version support: _____
-- Android minimum API level: _____
-- Development language(s): _____
-- Framework version: _____
-- Build tools: _____
-
-Dependencies Audit:
-- Number of third-party packages: _____
-- Outdated dependencies: _____ count
-- Security vulnerabilities: _____ count
-- License compatibility issues: _____ count
-- Heavy/problematic dependencies: _____
-
-Development Tools:
-- IDE/Editor primarily used: _____
-- Version control system: _____
-- CI/CD pipeline: _____
-- Testing frameworks: _____
-- Code quality tools: _____
-```
-
-### Phase 2: Architecture Analysis
-
-#### 2.1 Code Structure Assessment
-**Objective:** Analyze current architectural patterns and code organization.
-
-**Architecture Pattern Identification:**
-```
-Current Architecture:
-- Overall pattern: MVC/MVP/MVVM/Clean Architecture/Other/None
-- State management approach: _____
-- Navigation pattern: _____
-- Dependency injection: Yes/No - Method: _____
-- Separation of concerns: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Layer boundaries: Clear/Unclear/Inconsistent
-
-Code Organization:
-- Directory structure: Organized/Somewhat Organized/Disorganized
-- Feature grouping: By Feature/By Type/Mixed/None
-- File naming conventions: Consistent/Inconsistent
-- Code duplication level: High/Medium/Low
-- Dead code presence: High/Medium/Low
-```
-
-**Detailed Architecture Mapping:**
-```
-For Flutter Apps:
-├── Architecture Pattern: _____
-├── State Management: 
-│   ├── Solution used: Provider/BLoC/Cubit/Riverpod/GetX/setState/Other
-│   ├── Implementation quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-│   ├── Consistency across app: Yes/No
-│   └── Performance impact: High/Medium/Low
-├── Data Layer:
-│   ├── API integration: REST/GraphQL/Other
-│   ├── Local storage: SharedPreferences/Hive/SQLite/Other
-│   ├── Caching strategy: Present/Absent
-│   └── Offline support: Yes/No/Partial
-├── UI Layer:
-│   ├── Widget composition: Good/Fair/Poor
-│   ├── Custom widgets: _____ count
-│   ├── Theme implementation: Consistent/Inconsistent
-│   └── Responsive design: Yes/No/Partial
-
-For React Native Apps:
-├── Architecture Pattern: _____
-├── State Management:
-│   ├── Solution used: Redux/Context API/MobX/Zustand/Other
-│   ├── Implementation quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-│   ├── Consistency across app: Yes/No
-│   └── Performance impact: High/Medium/Low
-├── Navigation:
-│   ├── Library used: React Navigation/Native Navigation/Other
-│   ├── Version: _____
-│   ├── Implementation quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-│   └── Deep linking support: Yes/No
-├── Component Architecture:
-│   ├── Component composition: Good/Fair/Poor
-│   ├── Reusable components: _____ count
-│   ├── Styling approach: StyleSheet/Styled Components/Other
-│   └── TypeScript usage: Full/Partial/None
-```
-
-#### 2.2 Code Quality Assessment
-**Objective:** Evaluate code quality metrics and maintainability factors.
-
-**Code Quality Metrics:**
-```
-Quantitative Analysis:
-- Lines of code: _____
-- Number of files: _____
-- Average file size: _____ lines
-- Cyclomatic complexity: High/Medium/Low
-- Code duplication percentage: _____%
-- Test coverage: _____%
-- Documentation coverage: _____%
-
-Qualitative Assessment:
-┌──────────────────────┬─────────┬─────────┬─────────┬──────────┐
-│ Quality Aspect       │ Poor    │ Fair    │ Good    │ Comments │
-├──────────────────────┼─────────┼─────────┼─────────┼──────────┤
-│ Readability          │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Maintainability      │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Modularity           │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Error Handling       │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Logging              │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Security Practices   │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Performance Optimization │ ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-│ Accessibility        │   ___   │   ___   │   ___   │          │
-└──────────────────────┴─────────┴─────────┴─────────┴──────────┘
-```
-
-### Phase 3: Feature Analysis
-
-#### 3.1 Feature Inventory
-**Objective:** Catalog all existing features and their implementation quality.
-
-**Core Features Assessment:**
-```
-Authentication & User Management:
-- [ ] User registration: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Login/logout: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Password reset: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Profile management: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Social login: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Biometric auth: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-
-Data & Content Management:
-- [ ] Data synchronization: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Offline capabilities: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Search functionality: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Filtering/sorting: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Content creation: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] File upload/download: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-
-Communication & Notifications:
-- [ ] Push notifications: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] In-app messaging: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Email integration: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Social sharing: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Real-time updates: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-
-Device Integration:
-- [ ] Camera access: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Location services: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Contacts access: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Calendar integration: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Device sensors: Present/Absent - Quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-```
-
-#### 3.2 User Experience Analysis
-**Objective:** Evaluate user experience quality and identify improvement areas.
-
-**UX Assessment:**
-```
-Navigation & Flow:
-- Navigation pattern: Bottom Tab/Drawer/Stack/Mixed
-- Navigation depth: _____ levels maximum
-- Back button behavior: Consistent/Inconsistent
-- Deep linking: Supported/Not Supported
-- User flow complexity: Simple/Moderate/Complex
-
-Visual Design:
-- Design system consistency: High/Medium/Low
-- Color scheme coherence: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Typography consistency: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Icon usage: Consistent/Inconsistent
-- Brand alignment: Strong/Weak/None
-
-Interaction Design:
-- Touch target sizes: Appropriate/Too Small/Mixed
-- Gesture support: Comprehensive/Basic/None
-- Feedback mechanisms: Clear/Unclear/Missing
-- Loading states: Well-handled/Basic/Poor
-- Error states: Well-handled/Basic/Poor
-
-Performance Perception:
-- App launch time: Fast/Acceptable/Slow - _____ seconds
-- Screen transitions: Smooth/Jerky/Slow
-- Scrolling performance: Smooth/Choppy/Poor
-- Image loading: Fast/Slow/Poor
-- Overall responsiveness: High/Medium/Low
-```
-
-### Phase 4: Performance Analysis
-
-#### 4.1 Technical Performance Assessment
-**Objective:** Measure and analyze app performance metrics.
-
-**Performance Metrics Collection:**
-```
-App Size & Resources:
-- APK/IPA size: _____ MB
-- App size after installation: _____ MB
-- Memory usage (idle): _____ MB
-- Memory usage (active): _____ MB
-- CPU usage (average): _____%
-- Battery consumption: High/Medium/Low
-
-Startup Performance:
-- Cold start time: _____ milliseconds
-- Warm start time: _____ milliseconds
-- Time to interactive: _____ milliseconds
-- Splash screen duration: _____ milliseconds
-
-Runtime Performance:
-- Frame rate (average): _____ fps
-- Frame drops: Frequent/Occasional/Rare
-- Memory leaks detected: Yes/No - Count: _____
-- Crash frequency: _____ per 1000 sessions
-- ANR frequency: _____ per 1000 sessions (Android)
-```
-
-#### 4.2 Network Performance Analysis
-**Objective:** Evaluate network usage and API performance.
-
-**Network Analysis:**
-```
-API Performance:
-- Average response time: _____ milliseconds
-- 95th percentile response time: _____ milliseconds
-- API failure rate: _____%
-- Timeout occurrences: Frequent/Occasional/Rare
-- Retry mechanisms: Present/Absent
-
-Data Usage:
-- Average data consumption per session: _____ MB
-- Background data usage: _____ MB/hour
-- Image optimization: Present/Absent
-- Caching effectiveness: High/Medium/Low/None
-- Offline capability: Full/Partial/None
-
-Connection Handling:
-- Network error handling: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Slow connection adaptation: Yes/No
-- Connection state awareness: Yes/No
-- Data compression: Used/Not Used
-```
-
-### Phase 5: Technical Debt Assessment
-
-#### 5.1 Code Debt Analysis
-**Objective:** Identify and quantify technical debt across the codebase.
-
-**Technical Debt Categories:**
-```
-Code Quality Debt:
-- [ ] Duplicate code blocks: _____ instances
-- [ ] Long methods/functions: _____ count (>50 lines)
-- [ ] Large classes/components: _____ count (>500 lines)
-- [ ] Deep nesting: _____ instances (>4 levels)
-- [ ] Magic numbers/strings: _____ count
-- [ ] Missing error handling: _____ locations
-- [ ] Inconsistent naming: _____ instances
-- [ ] Dead code: _____ files/functions
-
-Architecture Debt:
-- [ ] Tight coupling: High/Medium/Low
-- [ ] Missing abstraction layers: _____ areas
-- [ ] Circular dependencies: _____ count
-- [ ] Violation of SOLID principles: _____ instances
-- [ ] Mixed concerns: _____ locations
-- [ ] Inconsistent patterns: _____ areas
-
-Technology Debt:
-- [ ] Outdated dependencies: _____ count
-- [ ] Security vulnerabilities: _____ count
-- [ ] Deprecated API usage: _____ instances
-- [ ] Platform version compatibility issues: _____ count
-- [ ] Performance bottlenecks: _____ identified
-- [ ] Missing updates for new platform features: _____ count
-```
-
-#### 5.2 Maintenance Burden Assessment
-**Objective:** Evaluate the ongoing maintenance complexity and effort.
-
-**Maintenance Factors:**
-```
-Development Complexity:
-- Build process complexity: High/Medium/Low
-- Development setup time: _____ hours for new developer
-- Code review effort: High/Medium/Low
-- Testing complexity: High/Medium/Low
-- Deployment complexity: High/Medium/Low
-
-Knowledge Dependencies:
-- Documentation quality: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Code self-documentation: Good/Fair/Poor
-- Critical knowledge holders: _____ people
-- Bus factor risk: High/Medium/Low
-- Onboarding difficulty: High/Medium/Low
-
-Change Impact:
-- Feature addition complexity: High/Medium/Low
-- Bug fix difficulty: High/Medium/Low
-- Refactoring safety: High/Medium/Low
-- Testing confidence: High/Medium/Low
-- Regression risk: High/Medium/Low
-```
-
-### Phase 6: Security Assessment
-
-#### 6.1 Security Audit
-**Objective:** Identify security vulnerabilities and compliance issues.
-
-**Security Checklist:**
-```
-Data Security:
-- [ ] Data encryption at rest: Yes/No
-- [ ] Data encryption in transit: Yes/No
-- [ ] Secure API communication: HTTPS/HTTP
-- [ ] Certificate pinning: Implemented/Not Implemented
-- [ ] API key security: Secure/Exposed/Mixed
-- [ ] Sensitive data in logs: Present/Absent
-- [ ] Local data protection: Strong/Weak/None
-
-Authentication & Authorization:
-- [ ] Secure authentication flow: Yes/No
-- [ ] Token security: Secure/Insecure
-- [ ] Session management: Good/Fair/Poor
-- [ ] Authorization checks: Comprehensive/Partial/Missing
-- [ ] Biometric integration security: Good/Fair/Poor/N/A
-
-Platform Security:
-- [ ] App signing: Proper/Improper
-- [ ] Code obfuscation: Present/Absent
-- [ ] Root/jailbreak detection: Present/Absent
-- [ ] Debug build protection: Yes/No
-- [ ] Screen recording protection: Yes/No
-- [ ] App backgrounding protection: Yes/No
-
-Compliance:
-- [ ] GDPR compliance: Yes/No/Partial
-- [ ] CCPA compliance: Yes/No/Partial
-- [ ] COPPA compliance (if applicable): Yes/No/N/A
-- [ ] Industry-specific compliance: _____ standards
-- [ ] Privacy policy implementation: Complete/Partial/Missing
-```
-
-### Phase 7: User Feedback Analysis
-
-#### 7.1 App Store Review Analysis
-**Objective:** Analyze user feedback from app stores to identify pain points.
-
-**Review Analysis:**
-```
-App Store Metrics:
-- iOS App Store rating: ___/5 (_____ reviews)
-- Google Play Store rating: ___/5 (_____ reviews)
-- Recent rating trend: Improving/Stable/Declining
-- Review response rate: _____%
-
-Common Complaints (Top 5):
-1. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-2. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-3. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-4. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-5. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-
-Positive Feedback Themes:
-1. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-2. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-3. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-
-Feature Requests (Top 5):
-1. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-2. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-3. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-4. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-5. _____ - Frequency: _____%
-```
-
-### Phase 8: Recommendation Development
-
-#### 8.1 Improvement Prioritization Matrix
-**Objective:** Prioritize improvements based on impact and effort.
-
-**Priority Matrix:**
-```
-┌─────────────────────────┬────────┬────────┬──────────┬──────────┐
-│ Improvement Area        │ Impact │ Effort │ Priority │ Timeline │
-├─────────────────────────┼────────┼────────┼──────────┼──────────┤
-│ Performance Optimization│   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ UI/UX Improvements      │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Security Enhancements   │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Code Quality Refactoring│   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Architecture Updates    │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Feature Additions       │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Technology Updates      │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Testing Improvements    │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-│ Documentation Updates   │   H/M/L│   H/M/L│    ___   │  ___     │
-└─────────────────────────┴────────┴────────┴──────────┴──────────┘
-
-Legend: H=High, M=Medium, L=Low
-```
-
-#### 8.2 Strategic Recommendations
-**Objective:** Provide strategic guidance for app evolution.
-
-**Strategic Options:**
-```
-Option 1: Incremental Improvements
-Description: Gradual improvements to existing codebase
-Pros: 
-- _____ 
-- _____
-- _____
-Cons:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Estimated Timeline: _____ months
-Estimated Cost: $_____
-
-Option 2: Partial Rewrite
-Description: Rewrite specific modules while keeping core intact
-Pros:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Cons:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Estimated Timeline: _____ months
-Estimated Cost: $_____
-
-Option 3: Complete Rewrite
-Description: Start fresh with modern architecture and technologies
-Pros:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Cons:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Estimated Timeline: _____ months
-Estimated Cost: $_____
-
-Option 4: Platform Migration
-Description: Migrate to different development platform
-Pros:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Cons:
-- _____
-- _____
-- _____
-Estimated Timeline: _____ months
-Estimated Cost: $_____
-
-Recommended Option: _____ 
-Rationale: _____
-```
-
-### Phase 9: Implementation Roadmap
-
-#### 9.1 Phased Implementation Plan
-**Objective:** Create detailed implementation roadmap with phases and milestones.
-
-**Implementation Phases:**
-```
-Phase 1: Critical Issues (_____ weeks)
-Objectives:
-- [ ] Fix critical bugs and security vulnerabilities
-- [ ] Address performance bottlenecks
-- [ ] Improve app stability
-
-Deliverables:
-- [ ] Bug fixes: _____ critical issues resolved
-- [ ] Security patches: _____ vulnerabilities addressed
-- [ ] Performance improvements: _____ target metrics achieved
-
-Phase 2: Quality Improvements (_____ weeks)
-Objectives:
-- [ ] Improve code quality and maintainability
-- [ ] Enhance testing coverage
-- [ ] Update documentation
-
-Deliverables:
-- [ ] Code refactoring: _____ modules improved
-- [ ] Test coverage: _____ % target achieved
-- [ ] Documentation: _____ sections updated
-
-Phase 3: Feature Enhancements (_____ weeks)
-Objectives:
-- [ ] Implement high-priority user-requested features
-- [ ] Improve user experience
-- [ ] Add missing functionality
-
-Deliverables:
-- [ ] New features: _____ features implemented
-- [ ] UX improvements: _____ areas enhanced
-- [ ] User satisfaction: _____ target rating
-
-Phase 4: Technology Modernization (_____ weeks)
-Objectives:
-- [ ] Update technology stack
-- [ ] Implement modern architecture patterns
-- [ ] Improve development productivity
-
-Deliverables:
-- [ ] Technology updates: _____ dependencies updated
-- [ ] Architecture: _____ patterns implemented
-- [ ] Developer experience: _____ improvements made
-```
-
-### Phase 10: Success Metrics Definition
-
-#### 10.1 Key Performance Indicators
-**Objective:** Define measurable success criteria for improvements.
-
-**Technical KPIs:**
-```
-Performance Metrics:
-- App launch time: Current: _____ms, Target: _____ms
-- Crash rate: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-- Memory usage: Current: _____MB, Target: _____MB
-- Battery consumption: Current: _____, Target: _____
-- API response time: Current: _____ms, Target: _____ms
-
-Quality Metrics:
-- Code coverage: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-- Code duplication: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-- Technical debt ratio: Current: _____, Target: _____
-- Security vulnerabilities: Current: _____, Target: _____
-- Documentation coverage: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-
-User Experience Metrics:
-- App store rating: Current: ___/5, Target: ___/5
-- User retention: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-- Session duration: Current: _____min, Target: _____min
-- Feature adoption: Current: ____%, Target: _____%
-- User satisfaction: Current: ___/10, Target: ___/10
-```
-
-#### 10.2 Monitoring Plan
-**Objective:** Establish ongoing monitoring and measurement strategy.
-
-**Monitoring Strategy:**
-```
-Performance Monitoring:
-- Tools: _____
-- Metrics tracked: _____
-- Alert thresholds: _____
-- Review frequency: _____
-
-Quality Monitoring:
-- Code quality tools: _____
-- Automated checks: _____
-- Review processes: _____
-- Quality gates: _____
-
-User Experience Monitoring:
-- Analytics tools: _____
-- User feedback collection: _____
-- A/B testing framework: _____
-- Success measurement: _____
-```
-
-## Deliverables
-
-This analysis should produce the following comprehensive deliverables:
-
-1. **Executive Summary** - High-level findings and recommendations
-2. **Technical Assessment Report** - Detailed technical analysis
-3. **Architecture Documentation** - Current state architecture mapping
-4. **Code Quality Report** - Code quality metrics and improvement areas
-5. **Performance Analysis** - Performance benchmarks and optimization opportunities
-6. **Security Audit Report** - Security vulnerabilities and compliance status
-7. **User Experience Analysis** - UX evaluation and improvement recommendations
-8. **Technical Debt Assessment** - Debt categorization and prioritization
-9. **Improvement Roadmap** - Phased implementation plan with timelines
-10. **Success Metrics Framework** - KPIs and monitoring strategy
-
-## Quality Assurance
-
-### Review Checklist
-- [ ] All analysis areas completed thoroughly
-- [ ] Quantitative data collected where possible
-- [ ] Qualitative assessments backed by evidence
-- [ ] Recommendations aligned with business goals
-- [ ] Implementation plan realistic and actionable
-- [ ] Success metrics clearly defined and measurable
-- [ ] Risk factors identified and mitigation planned
-- [ ] Stakeholder concerns addressed
-
-### Validation Process
-1. **Technical Review:** Validate technical findings with development team
-2. **Business Review:** Align recommendations with business objectives
-3. **User Research:** Validate UX findings with user research data
-4. **Stakeholder Review:** Present findings to key stakeholders
-5. **Implementation Planning:** Refine roadmap based on feedback
-
----
-
-**Note:** This comprehensive analysis requires significant time and access to various systems and data sources. Plan accordingly and ensure all necessary permissions and access are available before beginning the analysis.