alphacouncil-agent 0.9.2 → 1.0.0

package/data/build-profile.v1.json

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 {
   "schema_version": 1,
   "channel": "solo_test",
-  "package_version": "0.9.2",
+  "package_version": "1.0.0",
+  "persona_pack_version": "0.9.4",
   "pack_root": "knowledge/solo-test/masters",
   "assurance_class": "provisional_derived_proxy",
   "production_eligible": false,

package/data/council-evaluation-protocol.v1.json

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
       "master_druckenmiller",
       "master_buffett"
     ],
-    "canonical_26_master_ids": [
+    "canonical_master_ids": [
       "master_aschenbrenner",
       "master_buffett",
       "master_graham",
@@ -57,7 +57,8 @@
       "master_damodaran",
       "master_taleb",
       "master_natenberg",
-      "master_sinclair"
+      "master_sinclair",
+      "master_bogle"
     ]
   },
   "registration": {
@@ -289,7 +290,8 @@
         "master_damodaran",
         "master_taleb",
         "master_natenberg",
-        "master_sinclair"
+        "master_sinclair",
+        "master_bogle"
       ],
       "verifier_ids": [],
       "base_arm_ids": ["B"],
@@ -380,7 +382,8 @@
         "master_damodaran",
         "master_taleb",
         "master_natenberg",
-        "master_sinclair"
+        "master_sinclair",
+        "master_bogle"
       ],
       "verifier_ids": [],
       "base_arm_ids": ["B"],

package/data/master-selector-method-locales.v1.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
+/**
+ * Human-reviewed selector-method copy for the two locales that are not present in the
+ * legacy persona corpus. These sentences describe what the provisional method seat does;
+ * they are not quotations, endorsements or claims about a named person's current view.
+ */
+export const MASTER_SELECTOR_METHOD_LOCALES = Object.freeze({
+  master_ackman: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "現状の単独価値と改善による付加価値を分けたうえで、法的に実行可能で、資金調達ができ、期限が明確な主体が、その変更計画を遂行できるか検証する。",
+    ko: "현상 유지 기준의 독립 가치와 개선으로 생기는 추가 가치를 분리한 뒤, 법적으로 실행 가능하고 자금 조달이 가능하며 기한이 명확한 주체가 변화 계획을 수행할 수 있는지 검증한다.",
+  }),
+  master_aschenbrenner: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "AIのスケーリング仮説について、計算資源、電力、設備投資、供給制約、普及時期を、市場価格に織り込まれた期待と結び付けて検証する。",
+    ko: "AI 확장 가설을 컴퓨팅 자원, 전력, 자본 지출, 공급 제약, 도입 시점과 시장 가격에 반영된 기대를 연결해 검증한다.",
+  }),
+  master_asness: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "リターンをバリュー、モメンタム、クオリティ、ベータ、セクター、混雑度へのエクスポージャーに分解し、残差リターンをアルファとみなす前に検証する。",
+    ko: "수익률을 가치, 모멘텀, 퀄리티, 베타, 섹터, 쏠림 노출로 분해한 뒤 잔여 성과를 알파로 간주할 수 있는지 검증한다.",
+  }),
+  master_bogle: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "一つの事業ではなく一つのバスケットを評価し、長期期待リターンを配当利回り、利益成長、バリュエーション変化に分解したうえで、長期債利回りと保有コストと比較する。",
+    ko: "개별 기업이 아니라 바스켓을 평가하며, 장기 기대수익률을 배당수익률, 이익 성장, 밸류에이션 변화로 분해한 뒤 장기채 금리와 보유 비용에 견주어 판단한다.",
+  }),
+  master_buffett: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "理解可能な事業会社を、オーナー利益、持続的な競争優位、資本配分、および保守的な事業価値に対する価格から評価する。",
+    ko: "이해 가능한 사업을 소유주 이익, 지속 가능한 경쟁 우위, 자본 배분, 보수적으로 산정한 사업 가치 대비 가격을 통해 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_burry: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "一次資料と資本構成から出発し、構造的かつ機械的に検証可能なミスプライシングを探し、判断が早過ぎてもポジションを維持できるか検証する。",
+    ko: "1차 자료와 자본 구조에서 출발해 구조적이고 기계적으로 검증 가능한 오가격을 찾고, 진입이 너무 이른 경우에도 포지션을 유지할 수 있는지 검증한다.",
+  }),
+  master_cathie_wood: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "技術コスト曲線と普及率を、獲得可能市場、企業の取り分、ユニットエコノミクス、および明示的な5年後の評価分布につなげる。",
+    ko: "기술 비용 곡선과 도입률을 잠재 시장, 기업의 점유 몫, 단위 경제성, 명시적인 5년 가치평가 분포로 연결한다.",
+  }),
+  master_dalio: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "成長、インフレ、債務サイクル、政策レジームを分類し、借換えエクスポージャーと共通のマクロ要因への集中を評価する。",
+    ko: "성장, 인플레이션, 부채 사이클, 정책 국면을 분류한 뒤 차환 노출과 공통 거시 요인에 대한 집중도를 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_damodaran: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "検証可能な事業ストーリーを成長率、利益率、再投資、リスク、キャッシュフローに変換し、価値分布と価格に織り込まれたストーリーを明らかにする。",
+    ko: "검증 가능한 사업 이야기를 성장률, 마진, 재투자, 위험, 현금흐름으로 변환한 뒤 가치 분포와 가격에 내재된 이야기를 드러낸다.",
+  }),
+  master_druckenmiller: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "流動性、利益予想の修正、価格による確認、将来期間にわたる非対称リスクから、売買可能なマクロおよび企業の転換機会を特定する。",
+    ko: "유동성, 이익 전망 수정, 가격 확인, 향후 기간의 비대칭 위험을 바탕으로 거래 가능한 거시 및 기업 변곡 기회를 식별한다.",
+  }),
+  master_duan_yongping: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "単純明快なビジネスモデルを、ユーザー価値、企業文化、経営陣の誠実性、長期的な経済性、機会費用から評価する。",
+    ko: "단순하고 명확한 사업 모델을 사용자 가치, 기업 문화, 경영진의 정직성, 장기 경제성, 기회비용을 통해 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_fisher: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "複数の関係者への聞き取り、研究開発の生産性、販売力、経営層の厚み、再投資余地から長期成長の質を評価する。",
+    ko: "여러 이해관계자에 대한 탐문, 연구개발 생산성, 영업 역량, 경영진의 깊이, 재투자 여력을 통해 장기 성장의 질을 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_forensic_short: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "特定の著名人に紐づかない専門手法で、会計の再構成、ガバナンス証拠、借株の経済性、検証可能なカタリスト経路を組み合わせる。",
+    ko: "특정 유명 인물에 귀속되지 않는 전문 방식으로 회계 재구성, 지배구조 증거, 주식 대차의 경제성, 검증 가능한 촉매 경로를 결합한다.",
+  }),
+  master_graham: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "資産価値または平準化利益に基づく下限を設定し、株式リスクを取る前に、人による審査を経た安全余裕を求める。",
+    ko: "자산 가치 또는 정상화 이익에 기반한 하한을 설정하고, 주식 위험을 감수하기 전에 사람의 심사를 거친 안전마진을 요구한다.",
+  }),
+  master_jhunjhunwala: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "インドの構造成長を、支配株主・創業家のガバナンス、キャッシュの質、潜在市場への浸透、規模拡大の経済性、評価、流動性から検証する。",
+    ko: "인도의 구조적 성장을 대주주·창업자 거버넌스, 현금의 질, 잠재 시장 침투율, 규모 확대의 경제성, 가치평가, 유동성을 통해 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_klarman: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "下値を支える資産保護、現金の選択価値、カタリスト、保守的な回収分析を通じて、資本保全を伴う絶対収益を追求する。",
+    ko: "하방을 지지하는 자산 보호, 현금의 선택권 가치, 촉매, 보수적인 회수 분석을 통해 자본 보전을 동반한 절대수익을 추구한다.",
+  }),
+  master_li_lu: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "10年間の事業確度、経営陣の誠実性、社会における構造的価値、永久損失リスク、価格に織り込まれた長期リターンを評価する。",
+    ko: "10년 동안의 사업 확실성, 경영진의 정직성, 사회적 구조 가치, 영구 손실 위험, 가격에 내재된 장기 수익률을 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_lynch: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "会社の類型を先に分類し、証拠に裏づけられた簡潔なストーリーを検証したうえで、類型に適した成長性、バランスシート、評価のチェックを適用する。",
+    ko: "기업 유형을 먼저 분류하고 증거에 근거한 간결한 이야기를 검증한 뒤, 유형에 맞는 성장성, 재무상태표, 가치평가 점검을 적용한다.",
+  }),
+  master_marks: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "一点予測ではなく、サイクルの過熱度、市場コンセンサス、価格に織り込まれた期待、信用環境、永久損失リスクに合わせて投資姿勢の積極度を調整する。",
+    ko: "단일 시점 예측 대신 사이클의 과열 정도, 시장 합의, 가격에 내재된 기대, 신용 여건, 영구 손실 위험에 맞춰 투자 자세의 공격성을 조절한다.",
+  }),
+  master_munger: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "投資仮説を逆から検討し、永久損失に至る経路を洗い出し、インセンティブを監査し、分野横断的な因果モデルで複合リスクを検証する。",
+    ko: "투자 가설을 거꾸로 검토하고 영구 손실 경로를 도식화하며, 유인을 점검하고 여러 학문 분야의 인과 모델로 결합 위험을 검증한다.",
+  }),
+  master_natenberg: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "インプライド・ボラティリティ、スキュー、期間構造、グリークス、損益構造、実行可能なマーケットメイク制約から、オプションの相対価値を評価する。",
+    ko: "내재변동성, 스큐, 기간 구조, 그릭스, 손익 구조, 실제 집행 가능한 시장조성 제약을 통해 옵션의 상대가치를 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_pabrai: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "不確実性と永久損失リスクを分け、保守的な下値の下限と通常シナリオでの非対称な成果を備えた、単純で独立に再構成できる案件を探す。",
+    ko: "불확실성과 영구 손실 위험을 구분하고, 보수적인 하방 하한과 일반적 시나리오에서의 비대칭 성과를 갖춘 단순하며 독립적으로 재구성 가능한 기회를 찾는다.",
+  }),
+  master_simons: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "情報漏洩の統制、多重検定、サンプル外評価、回転率、取引コストを通過した、統計的に検証可能なシグナルだけを採用する。",
+    ko: "정보 누출 통제, 다중 검정, 표본 외 평가, 회전율, 거래비용을 통과한 통계적으로 검증 가능한 신호만 채택한다.",
+  }),
+  master_sinclair: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "実現ボラティリティを予測してインプライド・ボラティリティと比較し、スプレッドとスリッページを差し引いた後も堅牢で実行可能な優位性だけに応じてポジションを決める。",
+    ko: "실현변동성을 예측해 내재변동성과 비교하고, 스프레드와 슬리피지를 차감한 뒤에도 견고하고 실행 가능한 우위에만 포지션 규모를 배정한다.",
+  }),
+  master_soros: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "価格、資金調達、ファンダメンタルズ、政策、参加者の信念の間にある反射的フィードバックを整理し、観測可能な崩壊条件を特定する。",
+    ko: "가격, 자금 조달, 펀더멘털, 정책, 참여자의 믿음 사이의 재귀적 피드백을 구조화한 뒤 관측 가능한 붕괴 조건을 식별한다.",
+  }),
+  master_taleb: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "まず破産リスクと隠れた凹性を排除し、そのうえで流動性、テール価格、執行摩擦を考慮した後もペイオフが頑健か、または正の凸性を持つか評価する。",
+    ko: "먼저 파산 위험과 숨은 오목성을 배제한 뒤, 유동성, 꼬리위험 가격, 집행 마찰을 반영하고도 손익 구조가 견고하거나 양의 볼록성을 갖는지 평가한다.",
+  }),
+  master_thorp: Object.freeze({
+    ja: "優位性とオッズを独立に推定し、推定誤差、依存関係、流動性、破産リスクによってケリー基準型のポジション量を制約する。",
+    ko: "우위와 승산을 독립적으로 추정한 뒤, 추정 오차, 상호 의존성, 유동성, 파산 위험을 반영해 켈리 기준 방식의 포지션 규모를 제한한다.",
+  }),
+});
+
+/**
+ * Reader-facing suitability copy. Stable machine domain ids remain in
+ * manifest.capability.domains; none of those snake_case ids are exposed here.
+ */
+export const MASTER_SELECTOR_BEST_FOR_LOCALES = Object.freeze({
+  master_ackman: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Shareholder activism, corporate governance, capital allocation, and corporate change.",
+    zh: "股东行动主义、公司治理、资本配置与企业变革。",
+    ja: "株主アクティビズム、コーポレートガバナンス、資本配分、企業変革。",
+    ko: "주주 행동주의, 기업 지배구조, 자본 배분, 기업 변화.",
+  }),
+  master_aschenbrenner: Object.freeze({
+    en: "AI infrastructure, semiconductors, power constraints, and technology diffusion.",
+    zh: "人工智能基础设施、半导体、电力约束与技术扩散。",
+    ja: "AIインフラ、半導体、電力制約、技術普及。",
+    ko: "AI 인프라, 반도체, 전력 제약, 기술 확산.",
+  }),
+  master_asness: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Factor investing, portfolio attribution, style cycles, and crowded positioning.",
+    zh: "因子投资、组合归因、风格周期与拥挤交易。",
+    ja: "ファクター投資、ポートフォリオ帰属分析、スタイル循環、ポジションの混雑。",
+    ko: "팩터 투자, 포트폴리오 성과 귀속, 스타일 순환, 포지션 쏠림.",
+  }),
+  master_bogle: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Index funds, ETFs, market-wide expected return, and cost of ownership.",
+    zh: "指数基金、ETF、整体市场预期回报与持有成本。",
+    ja: "インデックスファンド、ETF、市場全体の期待リターン、保有コスト。",
+    ko: "인덱스 펀드, ETF, 시장 전체 기대수익률, 보유 비용.",
+  }),
+  master_buffett: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Operating businesses, business quality, capital allocation, and intrinsic value.",
+    zh: "实体经营企业、商业质量、资本配置与内在价值。",
+    ja: "事業会社、事業の質、資本配分、内在価値。",
+    ko: "실물 사업, 사업의 질, 자본 배분, 내재가치.",
+  }),
+  master_burry: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Primary-document research, capital structure, accounting forensics, and structural mispricing.",
+    zh: "一手文件研究、资本结构、会计取证与结构性错价。",
+    ja: "一次資料調査、資本構成、会計フォレンジック、構造的なミスプライシング。",
+    ko: "1차 자료 조사, 자본 구조, 회계 포렌식, 구조적 오가격.",
+  }),
+  master_cathie_wood: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Disruptive innovation, technology adoption, platform convergence, and growth valuation.",
+    zh: "颠覆式创新、技术采用、平台融合与成长估值。",
+    ja: "破壊的イノベーション、技術普及、プラットフォーム融合、成長企業の評価。",
+    ko: "파괴적 혁신, 기술 도입, 플랫폼 융합, 성장 기업 가치평가.",
+  }),
+  master_dalio: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Macro regimes, debt cycles, cross-asset risk, and portfolio balance.",
+    zh: "宏观环境、债务周期、跨资产风险与组合平衡。",
+    ja: "マクロ環境、債務サイクル、クロスアセット・リスク、ポートフォリオの均衡。",
+    ko: "거시 국면, 부채 사이클, 자산군 간 위험, 포트폴리오 균형.",
+  }),
+  master_damodaran: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Intrinsic valuation, converting stories into numbers, young companies, and reverse valuation.",
+    zh: "内在估值、故事量化、年轻企业与反向估值。",
+    ja: "内在価値評価、ストーリーの数値化、若い企業、リバース・バリュエーション。",
+    ko: "내재가치 평가, 이야기의 수치화, 초기 기업, 역산 가치평가.",
+  }),
+  master_druckenmiller: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Global macro, liquidity, earnings inflections, and concentrated positioning.",
+    zh: "全球宏观、流动性、盈利拐点与集中持仓。",
+    ja: "グローバルマクロ、流動性、利益の変曲点、集中ポジション。",
+    ko: "글로벌 매크로, 유동성, 이익 변곡점, 집중 포지셔닝.",
+  }),
+  master_duan_yongping: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Consumer businesses, product value, corporate culture, and opportunity cost.",
+    zh: "消费企业、产品价值、企业文化与机会成本。",
+    ja: "消費者向け事業、製品価値、企業文化、機会費用。",
+    ko: "소비자 사업, 제품 가치, 기업 문화, 기회비용.",
+  }),
+  master_fisher: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Growth quality, field research, research productivity, and management depth.",
+    zh: "成长质量、实地调研、研发生产率与管理层梯队。",
+    ja: "成長の質、現場調査、研究開発の生産性、経営層の厚み。",
+    ko: "성장의 질, 현장 조사, 연구개발 생산성, 경영진의 깊이.",
+  }),
+  master_forensic_short: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Forensic accounting, governance warning signs, short-sale feasibility, and catalyst analysis.",
+    zh: "财务取证、治理警示、做空可行性与催化剂分析。",
+    ja: "会計フォレンジック、ガバナンス上の警告、空売りの実行可能性、カタリスト分析。",
+    ko: "회계 포렌식, 지배구조 경고 신호, 공매도 실행 가능성, 촉매 분석.",
+  }),
+  master_graham: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Deep value, asset-backed securities, normalized earnings, and distressed equities.",
+    zh: "深度价值、资产支撑证券、正常化盈利与困境股权。",
+    ja: "ディープバリュー、資産裏付け証券、平準化利益、ディストレスト株式。",
+    ko: "딥 밸류, 자산 담보 증권, 정상화 이익, 부실 기업 주식.",
+  }),
+  master_jhunjhunwala: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Indian equities, structural penetration, promoter governance, and concentrated growth.",
+    zh: "印度股票、结构性渗透、控股股东治理与集中成长投资。",
+    ja: "インド株、構造的な普及、支配株主のガバナンス、集中型成長投資。",
+    ko: "인도 주식, 구조적 보급, 지배주주 거버넌스, 집중 성장 투자.",
+  }),
+  master_klarman: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Capital preservation, distressed value, complex securities, and catalyst-driven value.",
+    zh: "资本保全、困境价值、复杂证券与催化剂驱动价值。",
+    ja: "資本保全、ディストレスト・バリュー、複雑証券、カタリスト主導の価値。",
+    ko: "자본 보전, 부실 자산 가치, 복합 증권, 촉매 중심 가치.",
+  }),
+  master_li_lu: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Long-duration quality, management integrity, structural growth, and capital preservation.",
+    zh: "长期质量、管理层诚信、结构性成长与资本保全。",
+    ja: "長期持続する質、経営陣の誠実性、構造的成長、資本保全。",
+    ko: "장기 지속 품질, 경영진의 정직성, 구조적 성장, 자본 보전.",
+  }),
+  master_lynch: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Consumer observation, growth categories, cyclicals, turnarounds, and asset plays.",
+    zh: "消费者观察、成长类别、周期股、困境反转与资产型机会。",
+    ja: "消費者観察、成長カテゴリー、景気循環株、再建案件、資産価値型投資。",
+    ko: "소비자 관찰, 성장 유형, 경기민감주, 턴어라운드, 자산가치 투자.",
+  }),
+  master_marks: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Credit cycles, distressed value, market psychology, and risk posture.",
+    zh: "信用周期、困境价值、市场心理与风险姿态。",
+    ja: "信用サイクル、ディストレスト・バリュー、市場心理、リスク姿勢。",
+    ko: "신용 사이클, 부실 자산 가치, 시장 심리, 위험 태도.",
+  }),
+  master_munger: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Business quality, incentives, failure analysis, and capital allocation.",
+    zh: "商业质量、激励机制、失败分析与资本配置。",
+    ja: "事業の質、インセンティブ、失敗分析、資本配分。",
+    ko: "사업의 질, 유인 구조, 실패 분석, 자본 배분.",
+  }),
+  master_natenberg: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Options pricing, volatility surfaces, option sensitivities, and relative value.",
+    zh: "期权定价、波动率曲面、期权敏感度与相对价值。",
+    ja: "オプション価格、ボラティリティ・サーフェス、オプション感応度、相対価値。",
+    ko: "옵션 가격결정, 변동성 곡면, 옵션 민감도, 상대가치.",
+  }),
+  master_pabrai: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Dhandho-style value, special situations, downside protection, and concentrated odds.",
+    zh: "低风险高回报价值、特殊情形、下行保护与集中赔率。",
+    ja: "低リスク高リターン型の価値投資、特殊状況、下値保護、集中した勝算。",
+    ko: "저위험 고수익형 가치 투자, 특수 상황, 하방 보호, 집중된 승산.",
+  }),
+  master_simons: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Systematic signals, statistical arbitrage, portfolio research, and execution costs.",
+    zh: "系统化信号、统计套利、组合研究与执行成本。",
+    ja: "システマティック・シグナル、統計的裁定、ポートフォリオ研究、執行コスト。",
+    ko: "체계적 신호, 통계적 차익거래, 포트폴리오 연구, 집행 비용.",
+  }),
+  master_sinclair: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Volatility forecasting, options execution, edge measurement, and position sizing.",
+    zh: "波动率预测、期权执行、优势度量与仓位管理。",
+    ja: "ボラティリティ予測、オプション執行、優位性の測定、ポジション量。",
+    ko: "변동성 예측, 옵션 집행, 우위 측정, 포지션 규모 결정.",
+  }),
+  master_soros: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Global macro, reflexivity, boom-bust dynamics, and crowded trades.",
+    zh: "全球宏观、反身性、繁荣萧条循环与拥挤交易。",
+    ja: "グローバルマクロ、再帰性、ブームと崩壊の力学、混雑した取引。",
+    ko: "글로벌 매크로, 재귀성, 호황과 붕괴의 역학, 혼잡 거래.",
+  }),
+  master_taleb: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Tail risk, convexity, options, and fragility analysis.",
+    zh: "尾部风险、凸性、期权与脆弱性分析。",
+    ja: "テールリスク、凸性、オプション、脆弱性分析。",
+    ko: "꼬리위험, 볼록성, 옵션, 취약성 분석.",
+  }),
+  master_thorp: Object.freeze({
+    en: "Probabilistic edge, position sizing, arbitrage, and risk of ruin.",
+    zh: "概率优势、仓位管理、套利与破产风险。",
+    ja: "確率的優位性、ポジション量、裁定、破産リスク。",
+    ko: "확률적 우위, 포지션 규모, 차익거래, 파산 위험.",
+  }),
+});
+
+export function selectorMethodLocale(personaId, languageKey) {
+  const value = MASTER_SELECTOR_METHOD_LOCALES[personaId]?.[languageKey];
+  if (!value) throw new Error(`missing selector method locale ${personaId}.${languageKey}`);
+  return value;
+}
+
+export function selectorBestForLocale(personaId, languageKey) {
+  const value = MASTER_SELECTOR_BEST_FOR_LOCALES[personaId]?.[languageKey];
+  if (!value) throw new Error(`missing selector best_for locale ${personaId}.${languageKey}`);
+  return value;
+}

package/data/persona-v3-ai-assisted-solo-profile.v1.json

@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@
   "production_eligible": false,
   "method_model_eligible": false,
   "requirements": {
-    "physical_solo_packs": 26,
+    "physical_solo_packs": 27,
     "ai_source_prereviews": 32,
     "ai_semantic_extractions": 32,
     "ai_semantic_skeptic_reviews": 32,
     "ai_semantic_adjudications": 32,
-    "ai_formula_cross_reviews": 52,
+    "ai_formula_cross_reviews": 54,
     "independent_roles_per_review": 3,
     "automated_experiment_runs": 8,
     "live_hosts": 4,

package/data/persona-v3-build-specs.v1.mjs

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /**
- * Canonical, non-production build specifications for the 26 PersonaPack v3 seats.
+ * Canonical, non-production build specifications for the PersonaPack v3 seats.
  *
  * Nothing in this file is evidence of a named person's method. Every method statement is a
  * planning hypothesis inherited from the current selector/prompt material. Source and case
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
  * module must never register a production pack or change a seat's maturity.
  */
 
+import { overlayAuthoredSeat } from "./authored/index.mjs";
+
 const PENDING = "pending_human_adjudication";
 
 function source(personaId, number, sourceFamily, acquisitionTarget) {
@@ -1057,6 +1059,50 @@ const seats = [
     },
     limits: ["Production volatility models, signals, portfolios and execution records are proprietary.", "Historical option quote quality and transaction-cost data may be insufficient for realistic reconstruction."],
   }),
+  // The other twenty-six seats price a business. None of them prices a basket, which is why an
+  // index or an ETF drew twenty-six abstentions rather than a number. This seat's method is the
+  // one that natively does.
+  buildSpec({
+    personaId: "master_bogle",
+    promptPath: "personas/masters/masters-value/bogle.md",
+    scope: "Price a basket rather than a business by decomposing the long-run expected return into dividend yield, earnings growth and the change in valuation, then judging it against the long bond and the cost of holding it.",
+    domains: ["index_funds", "exchange_traded_funds", "market_expected_return", "cost_of_ownership"],
+    excludes: ["a judgment on any single operating business", "security selection inside the basket", "a dated call on when a valuation reversion occurs", "manager skill inferred from a fund's past outperformance"],
+    facts: ["index.dividend_yield", "valuation.revenue_growth", "macro.long_bond_yield", "fund.top_ten_weight", "index.aggregate_earnings_yield", "macro.breakeven_inflation"],
+    decision: {
+      schemaId: "expected_market_return_v1",
+      eligibility: ["basket dividend yield", "basket earnings growth", "long bond yield", "holdings concentration"],
+      states: ["insufficient_return_inputs", "overpriced_market", "fair_expected_return", "low_cost_index_candidate"],
+      outputs: ["fundamental expected return", "expected return over the long bond", "valuation component", "breadth of the holding"],
+      failClosed: ["no basket-level yield", "no earnings growth input", "no holdings breakdown"],
+    },
+    tools: [
+      ["master_bogle.fundamental_expected_return", "Add the initial dividend yield to the growth of the underlying businesses.", ["index.fundamental_expected_return"]],
+      ["master_bogle.expected_return_over_long_bond", "Subtract the long bond yield from what the basket can reasonably be expected to deliver.", ["index.expected_return_over_long_bond"]],
+    ],
+    vetoes: [
+      ["master_bogle.expected_return_below_inflation", "Reject when dividend yield plus business growth does not exceed expected inflation, since no reduction in cost rescues a gross return already negative in real terms."],
+      ["master_bogle.single_business", "Decline when the subject is one operating business rather than a basket whose dividends and earnings aggregate."],
+      ["master_bogle.past_performance_claim", "Reject a case for a fund whose support is past outperformance rather than yield, growth and cost."],
+    ],
+    sources: [
+      source("master_bogle", 1, "published_work", "Acquire the author-written books on index investing with edition and page anchors for the return model and the cost argument."),
+      source("master_bogle", 2, "author_signed", "Acquire the signed occasional papers, articles and speeches where the return decomposition is stated with its arithmetic."),
+      source("master_bogle", 3, "institutional_primary", "Acquire fund and index-provider disclosures for expense ratios, dividend yields and the earnings basis behind each published aggregate multiple."),
+    ],
+    cases: {
+      decision: "Acquire dated public statements of expected market return with the yield, growth and valuation inputs frozen as stated at the time." ,
+      failure: "Acquire decade-long periods where the published expected return was materially too low, separating the author's own later commentary from third-party interpretation." ,
+      counterfactual: "Vary dividend yield, earnings growth, the long-run valuation centre, cost and concentration independently while holding the basket fixed." ,
+      golden: "Construct blinded basket cases where the same gross return does or does not survive cost and a valuation reversion, including single businesses whose expected state is an out-of-scope refusal." ,
+    },
+    limits: [
+      "Earnings growth is not published for a basket in this build, so a look-through revenue-growth aggregate stands in for it and that substitution changes the number.",
+      "Aggregate index multiples are quoted on incompatible earnings bases, so a reversion estimate is only meaningful within one basis and cannot be compared across sources.",
+      "Fund cost is not currently produced by the instrument feed, so the cost term depends on an acquisition target rather than on a live fact.",
+      "The method deliberately produces no judgment on a single business, so a large share of the coverage universe is out of scope by construction rather than by evidence gap.",
+    ],
+  }),
 ];
 
 export const personaV3BuildSpecs = Object.freeze({
@@ -1064,7 +1110,7 @@ export const personaV3BuildSpecs = Object.freeze({
   inventory_id: "personapack-v3-build-specs",
   inventory_status: "non_production_planning_only",
   canonical_catalog_source: "mcp/lib/personas/registry.mjs",
-  seat_count: 26,
+  seat_count: seats.length,
   adjudication_policy: Object.freeze({
     method_attribution: PENDING,
     source_grading: PENDING,
@@ -1074,7 +1120,18 @@ export const personaV3BuildSpecs = Object.freeze({
     experiments: "not_started",
     promotion_effect: "none",
   }),
-  seats: Object.freeze(seats),
+  seats: Object.freeze(seats.map(overlayAuthoredSeat)),
 });
 
+/**
+ * How many dedicated tools the whole bench plans.
+ *
+ * Computed from the specs rather than as seats times two: a method that needs a third step to
+ * express itself should be able to declare one without every downstream invariant reading the
+ * extra tool as drift. The count is still exact -- it is simply derived from the one place
+ * that knows it.
+ */
+export const PLANNED_TOOL_COUNT = personaV3BuildSpecs.seats
+  .reduce((total, seat) => total + seat.planned_dedicated_tools.length, 0);
+
 export default personaV3BuildSpecs;

package/docs/INSTALL.md

@@ -10,14 +10,24 @@ plain MCP server in the Claude desktop app.
 ---
 
 
-## npm
+## GitHub v1.0.0 preview
+
+This acceptance release is GitHub-only:
+
+```bash
+npm install -g github:Zhao73/alphacouncil-agent#v1.0.0
+```
+
+## npm channel
 
 ```bash
 npm install -g alphacouncil-agent@next
 ```
 
-`0.9.2` is intentionally on `next`; unqualified `alphacouncil-agent` follows the stable
-`latest` tag and does not install this non-GA preview.
+The GitHub-only 1.0.0 source upgrade does not run `npm publish` or change npm dist-tags.
+`alphacouncil-agent@next` installs whichever preview npm currently serves; verify it with
+`npm view alphacouncil-agent dist-tags --json` rather than assuming it is 1.0.0. The
+unqualified package follows the stable `latest` tag.
 
 Then point any MCP host at the `alphacouncil-agent` binary. For Claude Code:
 
@@ -57,7 +67,7 @@ persona set loads, and what the data directory holds.
 One command, `/alpha`. Modes are arguments.
 
 ```text
-/alpha <ticker>              full council — displays all methods and confirms this run's selection
+/alpha <ticker>              full council — displays all methods; headless run is bounded <=30m
 /alpha <ticker> quick        quick_v1 — 4 analysts incl. news + 1-4 methods + one parallel debate round (<=10m)
 /alpha <ticker> screen       mechanical filings screen only        (no model spend)
 /alpha <ticker> options      IV term structure, skew, positioning  (no model spend)
@@ -69,8 +79,35 @@ One command, `/alpha`. Modes are arguments.
 The four marked *no model spend* call keyless data tools and spawn no subagents. **Start
 there** — they show real data at no cost, so you can see the shape of the thing before
 committing a fan-out. Full and quick both require a fresh method selection receipt. Model
-spend is not a fixed seat count: selected method seats may execute deterministically or be
-recorded `out_of_scope`, while evidence and debate workers are model calls.
+spend is not a fixed seat count. In plugin-managed headless mode every selected v3 seat runs
+its deterministic policy (which may return `out_of_scope`) and then one isolated voice
+worker explains that frozen result; evidence and debate seats are also model workers. The
+voice is a recorded provisional method result, not the named person's words.
+
+### What full headless means
+
+Full remains `full_v2`. When launched through plugin-managed headless
+`analyze_symbol(council_mode="full")`, it has a hard maximum of 1800000 ms from durable
+queueing through terminal artifact persistence:
+
+- all eight mandatory evidence workers start in one parallel wave;
+- after the fail-closed evidence barrier, each selected physical v3 method freezes its
+  deterministic stance and gets one isolated voice worker that cannot alter it;
+- Bull and Bear start in parallel within each of three rounds, with a barrier between rounds
+  and exact Round-2-question to Round-3-answer binding;
+- the PM and deterministic report persistence use the same global clock.
+
+Callers and `ALPHACOUNCIL_FULL_TOTAL_MS` may lower the deadline, never raise it. At expiry
+the server saves a terminal `incomplete` run naming failed/timed-out/skipped seats. The
+30-minute bound guarantees terminal persistence, not complete results when search, model
+transport or data providers are unavailable. `plan_visible_run` has no such enforceable
+deadline because the external host owns and schedules its subagents.
+
+A full `user_response.md` lists all eight analyst statuses and summaries, every selected
+stable master ID with its stance and isolated-worker output/status, and a system-owned price
+snapshot with currency/time/source or an explicit quote-data gap. System-owned labels are
+localized for Chinese (`zh-CN`), English, Japanese and Korean, and worker prompts carry the
+run language.
 
 ### What `quick` means
 

package/docs/personas.md

@@ -52,11 +52,12 @@ To add a role, add one file. It appears in the tool schema automatically.
 | `master_taleb` | master | yes | masters-options, masters-core | deep | Taleb Lens (Convexity and Tails) | tail-risk, convexity, options | original |
 | `master_natenberg` | master | yes | masters-options, masters-core | deep | Natenberg Lens (Volatility Pricing) | implied-volatility, options-pricing, market-making | original |
 | `master_sinclair` | master | yes | masters-options, masters-core | deep | Sinclair Lens (Volatility Trading and Execution) | volatility-forecasting, edge-measurement, position-sizing, options | original |
+| `master_bogle` | master | yes | masters-value, masters-core | deep | Bogle Lens | investment-vs-speculative-return, cost-matters, own-the-basket | John C. Bogle's published writing on index investing (all-rights-reserved) |
 | `source_fidelity` | verifier | yes | verify | fast | Source Fidelity Verifier | citation, primary-source | original |
 | `rederivation` | verifier | yes | verify | fast | Rederivation Verifier | independent-confirmation, cross-check | original |
 | `refuter` | verifier | yes | verify | fast | Refuter | adversarial, disconfirming-search | original |
 
-Totals: 11 evidence analysts, 3 debate roles, 26 masters, 46 files.
+Totals: 11 evidence analysts, 3 debate roles, 27 masters, 47 files.
 
 ## Provenance