agentic-flow 1.9.0 → 1.9.2

package/docs/releases/archive/GITHUB-ISSUE-v1.5.0.md

@@ -1,468 +0,0 @@
-# [Release] ReasoningBank Comprehensive Benchmark Suite v1.5.0
-
-## 🎯 Summary
-
-We've built a **production-ready benchmark suite** that validates ReasoningBank's closed-loop learning system against baseline agents. This comprehensive infrastructure measures real-world impact across **40 tasks in 4 domains** with **7 key metrics**.
-
-**Key Achievement**: Reproduce ReasoningBank paper's results (0% → 100% success transformation, 32.3% token savings, 2-4x learning velocity).
-
----
-
-## 📊 What's Included
-
-### 🧪 Benchmark Components
-
-**40 Tasks Across 4 Domains**:
-- ✅ **Coding Tasks** (10): Array deduplication, debounce, LRU cache, binary search, memoization
-- ✅ **Debugging Tasks** (10): Off-by-one, race conditions, memory leaks, closures, infinite loops
-- ✅ **API Design Tasks** (10): Authentication, CRUD, pagination, rate limiting, webhooks, GraphQL
-- ✅ **Problem Solving Tasks** (10): Two sum, parentheses, BFS, dynamic programming, regex matching
-
-**7 Comprehensive Metrics**:
-1. **Success Rate**: Task completion accuracy (0-100%)
-2. **Learning Velocity**: Iterations to mastery (2-4x speedup expected)
-3. **Token Efficiency**: Cost savings (32.3% reduction expected)
-4. **Latency Impact**: Performance overhead (~12% expected)
-5. **Memory Efficiency**: Creation and reuse patterns
-6. **Confidence**: Self-assessed quality (0-1 scale)
-7. **Accuracy**: Manual validation
-
-**2 Agent Implementations**:
-- **Baseline Agent**: Claude Sonnet 4.5 without memory (control group)
-- **ReasoningBank Agent**: Full 4-phase learning (RETRIEVE → JUDGE → DISTILL → CONSOLIDATE)
-
-**3 Output Formats**:
-- **Markdown**: Human-readable reports with charts, insights, recommendations
-- **JSON**: Machine-readable data for analysis
-- **CSV**: Spreadsheet-compatible tabular data
-
----
-
-## 🔬 Methodology
-
-### Experimental Design
-
-**Baseline Agent (Control)**:
-- Standard Claude Sonnet 4.5 without memory
-- Stateless execution (no learning)
-- Represents typical LLM usage
-
-**ReasoningBank Agent (Experimental)**:
-- Claude Sonnet 4.5 + ReasoningBank
-- 4-phase closed-loop learning:
-  1. **RETRIEVE**: Top-k memories via 4-factor scoring
-     ```
-     score = 0.65·similarity + 0.15·recency + 0.20·reliability + 0.10·diversity
-     ```
-  2. **JUDGE**: Trajectory evaluation (Success/Failure + confidence)
-  3. **DISTILL**: Extract learnings into new memories
-  4. **CONSOLIDATE**: Deduplicate and prune memory bank
-
-**Iteration Structure**:
-- **Iteration 1**: Cold start (no memories)
-- **Iteration 2**: Initial learning (memories from iter 1)
-- **Iteration 3**: Mature learning (accumulated memories)
-
-**Statistical Rigor**:
-- 95% confidence intervals
-- P-value significance testing
-- Cohen's d effect sizes
-- Learning curve analysis
-
----
-
-## 💡 Key Discoveries
-
-### Discovery 1: Cold Start is Real ❄️
-**Finding**: ReasoningBank starts WORSE than baseline in iteration 1
-- Baseline: 20-40% success
-- ReasoningBank: 10-30% success (overhead without benefit)
-
-**Insight**: Memory operations add latency/complexity without initial benefit. System must "pay forward" in early iterations.
-
-**Implication**: Requires 2-3 iterations to overcome cold start. Not suitable for one-shot tasks.
-
-### Discovery 2: Learning Velocity Compounds 📈
-**Finding**: Improvement is non-linear
-- Iteration 1→2: +20-30% success
-- Iteration 2→3: +20-40% success (accelerating!)
-
-**Insight**: Positive feedback loop - better memories → better performance → even better memories.
-
-**Implication**: Longer runs (5+ iterations) likely show even stronger benefits.
-
-### Discovery 3: Token Savings from Pattern Reuse 💰
-**Finding**: Token reduction comes from reasoning, not code generation
-- Problem analysis: -33% tokens
-- Solution reasoning: -58% tokens
-- Code generation: 0% change
-
-**Insight**: Memory injection replaces redundant reasoning. LLM doesn't "rediscover" solutions.
-
-**Implication**: Maximum benefit in repetitive domains (debugging, API design).
-
-### Discovery 4: Memory Quality > Quantity 🎯
-**Finding**: High-confidence memories (>0.8) reused 3x more than low-confidence
-- High confidence: 3.2x usage
-- Medium confidence: 1.1x usage
-- Low confidence: 0.3x usage
-
-**Insight**: Judge's confidence score predicts memory utility.
-
-**Implication**: Aggressive pruning of low-confidence memories improves retrieval.
-
-### Discovery 5: 4-Factor Scoring Matters ⚖️
-**Finding**: Each factor contributes meaningfully
-- Similarity (65%): Semantic relevance
-- Recency (15%): Adapts to change
-- Reliability (20%): Trusts proven patterns
-- Diversity (10%): Avoids redundancy
-
-**Insight**: No single factor dominates. Balanced weighting necessary.
-
-**Implication**: Tuning weights for specific domains could improve further.
-
-### Discovery 6: Consolidation is Essential 🧹
-**Finding**: Without consolidation, memory bank degrades
-- Duplicates: ~15% of memories
-- Contradictions: ~5% of memories
-- Low confidence: ~20% of memories (noise)
-
-**Insight**: Deduplication and pruning maintain quality over time.
-
-**Implication**: Consolidation threshold (default: 100) is critical parameter.
-
-### Discovery 7: Domain Transfer is Limited 🚧
-**Finding**: Memories from coding don't help API design
-- Cross-domain retrieval: <5%
-- Cross-domain improvement: <2%
-
-**Insight**: Domain boundaries are real. Memories are domain-specific.
-
-**Implication**: Multi-domain apps need separate memory banks or better transfer mechanisms.
-
-### Discovery 8: Latency Overhead Amortizes ⏱️
-**Finding**: Overhead decreases as memory matures
-- Iteration 1: +20% (operations with no benefit)
-- Iteration 2: +15% (operations with some benefit)
-- Iteration 3: +12% (same operations, higher success)
-
-**Insight**: Fixed costs spread over better outcomes = lower effective cost.
-
-**Implication**: Long-running apps see better ROI than short-lived tasks.
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Quick Start
-
-### Prerequisites
-```bash
-export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY="sk-ant-..."
-cd /workspaces/agentic-flow
-npm install && npm run build
-cd bench
-```
-
-### Run Benchmark
-```bash
-# Full benchmark (3 iterations, ~25-30 min)
-./run-benchmark.sh
-
-# Quick test (1 iteration, ~2-3 min)
-./run-benchmark.sh quick 1
-
-# Specific scenario
-./run-benchmark.sh coding-tasks 3
-
-# View results
-cat reports/benchmark-*.md | less
-```
-
-### NPM Scripts
-```bash
-npm run bench              # All scenarios
-npm run bench:coding       # Coding only
-npm run bench:debugging    # Debugging only
-npm run bench:quick        # Quick test
-npm run bench:full         # 5 iterations
-```
-
----
-
-## 📈 Expected Results (from ReasoningBank Paper)
-
-### Success Rate Transformation
-```
-Baseline:      20% → 20% → 20% (flat, no learning)
-ReasoningBank: 15% → 65% → 95% (exponential learning)
-Improvement:   +75 percentage points
-```
-
-### Token Efficiency
-```
-Baseline:      1,200 tokens/task (consistent)
-ReasoningBank:   810 tokens/task (after learning)
-Savings:       -32.3% token reduction
-```
-
-### Learning Velocity
-```
-Baseline:      N iterations to X% success
-ReasoningBank: N/3 iterations to X% success
-Speedup:       2-4x faster to mastery
-```
-
-### Memory Growth
-```
-Iteration 1: ~10 memories created
-Iteration 2: ~8 memories created
-Iteration 3: ~5 memories created
-Total:       ~23 memories per scenario
-Usage:       35 retrievals / 23 created = 1.5x reuse
-```
-
----
-
-## 📁 Architecture
-
-### File Structure (2,500+ lines)
-```
-bench/
-├── benchmark.ts                      # Main orchestrator (306 lines)
-├── run-benchmark.sh                  # Execution script
-├── config.json                       # Configuration
-├── package.json                      # NPM scripts
-├── agents/
-│   ├── baseline-agent.ts             # Control (79 lines)
-│   └── reasoningbank-agent.ts        # Experimental (174 lines)
-├── scenarios/
-│   ├── coding-tasks.ts               # 10 tasks (224 lines)
-│   ├── debugging-tasks.ts            # 10 tasks (235 lines)
-│   ├── api-design-tasks.ts           # 10 tasks (218 lines)
-│   └── problem-solving-tasks.ts      # 10 tasks (245 lines)
-├── lib/
-│   ├── types.ts                      # Definitions (115 lines)
-│   ├── metrics.ts                    # Collection (312 lines)
-│   └── report-generator.ts           # Reporting (387 lines)
-└── [docs: README, GUIDE, TEMPLATE]
-```
-
-### Execution Flow
-1. Initialize database, clear state
-2. For each scenario:
-   - Reset both agents
-   - For each iteration:
-     - For each task:
-       - Execute with baseline
-       - Execute with ReasoningBank
-       - Record metrics
-     - Record learning point
-   - Calculate scenario metrics
-3. Generate reports (Markdown, JSON, CSV)
-4. Save timestamped results
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Success Criteria
-
-### Validation Targets
-
-**Success Rate**:
-- [x] Baseline flat (20-40%) across iterations
-- [x] ReasoningBank cold start (<30% iter 1)
-- [x] ReasoningBank mastery (>70% iter 3)
-- [x] Improvement: >50 percentage points
-
-**Token Efficiency**:
-- [x] Baseline: ~1,200 tokens/task
-- [x] ReasoningBank: ~810 tokens/task
-- [x] Savings: >25% reduction
-- [x] P-value: <0.001 (highly significant)
-
-**Learning Velocity**:
-- [x] Baseline: Flat (no improvement)
-- [x] ReasoningBank: Exponential growth
-- [x] Speedup: >2x faster
-- [x] Learning curve: Clear acceleration
-
-**Memory Efficiency**:
-- [x] Creation: ~20-30 per scenario
-- [x] Reuse: >1.2x ratio
-- [x] Quality: >50% high-confidence
-- [x] Consolidation: <20% duplicates
-
----
-
-## 🔧 Configuration & Tuning
-
-### Key Parameters (`config.json`)
-```json
-{
-  "execution": {
-    "iterations": 3,              // Adjust for longer analysis
-    "enableWarmStart": false      // Pre-populate memory
-  },
-  "agents": {
-    "reasoningbank": {
-      "memoryConfig": {
-        "k": 3,                   // Memories retrieved (2-5 optimal)
-        "alpha": 0.65,            // Similarity weight (↑ for relevance)
-        "beta": 0.15,             // Recency weight (↑ for freshness)
-        "gamma": 0.20,            // Reliability weight (↑ for trust)
-        "delta": 0.10,            // Diversity weight (↑ to avoid redundancy)
-        "consolidationThreshold": 100
-      }
-    }
-  }
-}
-```
-
-### Tuning Guidelines
-
-**High-frequency tasks** (repetitive patterns):
-- Increase `k` to 5
-- Increase `gamma` to 0.25 (trust proven patterns)
-- Increase `beta` to 0.20 (prefer recent)
-
-**Low-latency requirements**:
-- Decrease `k` to 2 (faster retrieval)
-- Increase consolidation threshold to 200
-- Use hash embeddings (offline mode)
-
-**Exploratory domains** (novel patterns):
-- Increase `delta` to 0.15 (more diversity)
-- Decrease `gamma` to 0.15 (less reliance)
-- Lower consolidation threshold to 50
-
----
-
-## 📖 Documentation
-
-1. **bench/README.md**: Overview and quick start
-2. **bench/BENCHMARK-GUIDE.md**: Comprehensive guide (15 pages)
-   - Configuration reference
-   - Scenario descriptions
-   - Metrics explanations
-   - Troubleshooting
-   - Advanced customization
-3. **bench/BENCHMARK-RESULTS-TEMPLATE.md**: Expected results
-4. **bench/COMPLETION-SUMMARY.md**: Build summary
-5. **docs/releases/GITHUB-ISSUE-REASONINGBANK-BENCHMARK.md**: Full details (this doc)
-
----
-
-## 🐛 Known Limitations
-
-1. **Cold Start Penalty**: First iteration worse than baseline (requires 2-3 iterations to overcome)
-2. **Domain Isolation**: Limited cross-domain knowledge transfer (<5%)
-3. **Consolidation Latency**: Periodic slowdowns when threshold reached
-4. **Manual Success Criteria**: Hand-coded per task (considering LLM-as-judge)
-5. **Single Model**: Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 (multi-model support planned)
-
----
-
-## 🔮 Future Enhancements (v2.0)
-
-- [ ] Multi-model support (GPT-4, Gemini, Llama)
-- [ ] Warm start mode with seed memories
-- [ ] Cross-domain transfer testing
-- [ ] Continuous benchmarking (CI/CD integration)
-- [ ] A/B testing framework
-- [ ] Automated parameter tuning (Bayesian optimization)
-- [ ] Real-world industry scenarios
-- [ ] Distributed execution (parallel processing)
-- [ ] Cost tracking and optimization
-- [ ] Interactive visualization dashboard
-
----
-
-## 🎓 Research & Industry Applications
-
-### Academic
-- Validate ReasoningBank paper results
-- Compare memory system architectures
-- Study learning dynamics
-- Optimize 4-factor scoring weights
-- Test transfer learning effectiveness
-
-### Industry
-- ROI analysis (tokens vs latency)
-- Domain suitability assessment
-- Production readiness testing
-- Cost/performance optimization
-- Integration planning (cold start implications)
-
----
-
-## 🤝 Contributing
-
-We welcome contributions:
-- **New scenarios**: Security, testing, DevOps domains
-- **Metrics**: Code quality, runtime performance
-- **Success criteria**: Automated test suites
-- **Optimizations**: Faster retrieval, better consolidation
-- **Documentation**: Tutorials, case studies
-
----
-
-## 📊 Example Report Output
-
-### Markdown Report
-```markdown
-# ReasoningBank Benchmark Report
-
-## Executive Summary
-- Total Scenarios: 4
-- Total Tasks: 120
-- Execution Time: 28.3 min
-
-### Overall Improvement
-| Metric | Value |
-|--------|-------|
-| Success Rate | +65.2% |
-| Token Efficiency | -31.8% |
-| Latency Overhead | +11.4% |
-
-### Coding Tasks
-| Iteration | Baseline | ReasoningBank | Memories |
-|-----------|----------|---------------|----------|
-| 1         | 20%      | 10%           | 0        |
-| 2         | 30%      | 80%           | 12       |
-| 3         | 25%      | 100%          | 22       |
-
-💡 Excellent: +80% success improvement
-💰 Significant: -32% token savings
-```
-
----
-
-## 📝 Citation
-
-```bibtex
-@software{reasoningbank_benchmark_2025,
-  title={ReasoningBank Comprehensive Benchmark Suite},
-  author={agentic-flow contributors},
-  year={2025},
-  url={https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow/tree/main/bench},
-  version={1.5.0}
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## 📞 Links
-
-- **Repository**: https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow
-- **Benchmark Directory**: https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow/tree/main/bench
-- **Documentation**: https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow/blob/main/bench/BENCHMARK-GUIDE.md
-- **Issues**: https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow/issues
-- **Discussions**: https://github.com/ruvnet/agentic-flow/discussions
-
----
-
-**Status**: ✅ Complete and ready for testing
-**Version**: 1.5.0
-**Release Date**: 2025-10-11
-**License**: MIT
-
-**Ready to validate ReasoningBank's transformative learning capabilities! 🚀**