@tomako/tools-runtime 0.1.0

package/src/features/tools/community-post-risk-checker/community-post-risk-checker.package.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,792 @@
+import { z } from "zod";
+
+import type { AppLocale } from "../../../i18n/locale";
+import {
+    communityPostRiskBriefSchema,
+    type CommunityPostRiskLevel,
+} from "../../../lib/tools/community-post-risk-checker-schema";
+import { createCommunityPostRiskReport } from "../../../lib/tools/community-post-risk-checker.format";
+
+import type { FormValues, ToolPackage } from "../package/types";
+
+/**
+ * Community Post Risk Checker（instant Package 试点）。
+ * 复用既有启发式 `createCommunityPostRiskReport`；表单与结果走 Package 引擎。
+ * 证据：strategic（存量 SEO 获客页，无独立 keyword brief；发布 KPI 不按新 brief 计）。
+ *
+ * 相对 legacy widget 的已知折损（阶段 4 go/no-go）：
+ * - 无侧栏 RiskPreview 色块实时预览
+ * - checks 无独立色徽章（cardList meta 文字近似）
+ * - 无独立 .md 下载按钮（引擎复制 Markdown 仍可用）
+ * - SEO 页从 immersive guide 栈改为 page.standard（内容不弱于迁移前意图）
+ */
+
+const t = (en: string, zh: string, zhTw: string) => ({ en, zh, "zh-tw": zhTw });
+const list = (en: string[], zh: string[], zhTw: string[]) => ({
+  en,
+  zh,
+  "zh-tw": zhTw,
+});
+
+const placeholderPattern =
+  /^(test|demo|sample|example|asdf|qwer|lorem ipsum|123+|111+|222+|xxx+)$/i;
+
+const linkPattern =
+  /(https?:\/\/|www\.|[\w-]+\.(?:com|io|ai|app|dev|co|net|org)\b)/i;
+
+const resultSchema = z.object({
+  riskScoreDisplay: z.string().min(1),
+  riskLevel: z.enum(["low", "medium", "high"]),
+  riskLevelLabel: z.string().min(1),
+  verdict: z.string().min(1),
+  primaryFix: z.string().min(1),
+  recommendedCta: z.string().min(1),
+  ctaRationale: z.string().min(1),
+  saferAlternative: z.string().min(1),
+  checks: z
+    .array(
+      z.object({
+        title: z.string().min(1),
+        meta: z.string().min(1),
+        reason: z.string().min(1),
+        fix: z.string().min(1),
+      }),
+    )
+    .min(1),
+  flaggedParagraphs: z
+    .array(
+      z.object({
+        title: z.string().min(1),
+        excerpt: z.string().min(1),
+        reasons: z.array(z.string()).min(1),
+        suggestion: z.string().min(1),
+      }),
+    )
+    .min(1),
+  revisionPlan: z.array(z.string()).min(1),
+  missingInfo: z.array(z.string()),
+  reviewChecklist: z.array(z.string()).min(1),
+});
+
+const RISK_LEVEL_LABEL: Record<CommunityPostRiskLevel, ReturnType<typeof t>> = {
+  low: t("Low risk", "低风险", "低風險"),
+  medium: t("Medium risk", "中风险", "中風險"),
+  high: t("High risk", "高风险", "高風險"),
+};
+
+function pick(text: ReturnType<typeof t>, locale: AppLocale): string {
+  if (locale === "en") return text.en;
+  if (locale === "zh-tw") return text["zh-tw"] ?? text.zh;
+  return text.zh;
+}
+
+function isWeakText(value: string, minLength: number) {
+  const text = value.trim();
+  if (!text) return true;
+  if (placeholderPattern.test(text)) return true;
+  if (/^\d+$/.test(text)) return true;
+  return text.length < minLength;
+}
+
+function toPackageResult(
+  values: FormValues,
+  locale: AppLocale,
+): z.infer<typeof resultSchema> {
+  const title = String(values.title ?? "").trim();
+  const postBody = String(values.postBody ?? "").trim();
+
+  if (isWeakText(title, 8) || isWeakText(postBody, 120)) {
+    throw new Error("weak input");
+  }
+
+  const language = locale === "en" ? "en" : "zh";
+  const brief = communityPostRiskBriefSchema.parse({
+    title,
+    postBody,
+    community: values.community,
+    goal: values.goal,
+    ctaPlan: values.ctaPlan,
+    linkIncluded: linkPattern.test(`${title}\n${postBody}`),
+    language,
+  });
+
+  const report = createCommunityPostRiskReport(brief);
+  const levelLabel = pick(RISK_LEVEL_LABEL[report.summary.riskLevel], locale);
+
+  const flaggedParagraphs =
+    report.flaggedParagraphs.length > 0
+      ? report.flaggedParagraphs.map((item) => ({
+          title:
+            locale === "en"
+              ? `Paragraph ${item.index} · ${item.riskLevel}`
+              : locale === "zh-tw"
+                ? `第 ${item.index} 段 · ${item.riskLevel}`
+                : `第 ${item.index} 段 · ${item.riskLevel}`,
+          excerpt: item.text,
+          reasons: [item.reason],
+          suggestion: item.suggestion,
+        }))
+      : [
+          {
+            title: pick(
+              t(
+                "No paragraph flags",
+                "本次无段落风险标记",
+                "本次無段落風險標記",
+              ),
+              locale,
+            ),
+            excerpt: pick(
+              t(
+                "No paragraph crossed the risk threshold in this pass. Still review the target community rules before posting.",
+                "本次没有段落超过风险阈值。发布前仍建议核对目标社区规则。",
+                "本次沒有段落超過風險閾值。發佈前仍建議核對目標社群規則。",
+              ),
+              locale,
+            ),
+            reasons: [
+              pick(
+                t(
+                  "Heuristic pass only",
+                  "仅为启发式通过",
+                  "僅為啟發式通過",
+                ),
+                locale,
+              ),
+            ],
+            suggestion: pick(
+              t(
+                "Re-check subreddit or forum rules before you submit.",
+                "提交前请再核对具体社区规则。",
+                "提交前請再核對具體社群規則。",
+              ),
+              locale,
+            ),
+          },
+        ];
+
+  return {
+    riskScoreDisplay: `${report.summary.riskScore}/100`,
+    riskLevel: report.summary.riskLevel,
+    riskLevelLabel: levelLabel,
+    verdict: report.summary.verdict,
+    primaryFix: report.summary.primaryFix,
+    recommendedCta: report.ctaAdvice.placement,
+    ctaRationale: report.ctaAdvice.rationale,
+    saferAlternative: report.ctaAdvice.saferAlternative,
+    checks: report.checks.map((check) => ({
+      title: check.label,
+      meta: `${check.score}/100 · ${check.status}`,
+      reason: check.reason,
+      fix: check.fix,
+    })),
+    flaggedParagraphs,
+    revisionPlan: report.revisionPlan,
+    missingInfo: report.missingInfo,
+    reviewChecklist: report.reviewChecklist,
+  };
+}
+
+export const communityPostRiskCheckerPackage: ToolPackage = {
+  meta: {
+    slug: "community-post-risk-checker",
+    toolType: "analyzer",
+    riskLevel: "high",
+    keywordEvidence:
+      "strategic:legacy SEO acquisition page; no dedicated keyword brief yet",
+    seo: {
+      publishedAt: "2026-06-30",
+      updatedAt: "2026-07-29",
+      readingTime: "6 min",
+      featured: true,
+      ogImage: "/tools/community-post-risk-checker-hero.webp",
+    },
+  },
+  copy: {
+    title: t(
+      "Community Post Risk Checker",
+      "社区帖子风险检查器",
+      "社群貼文風險檢查器",
+    ),
+    description: t(
+      "Paste a Reddit, r/SaaS, r/indiehackers, or Indie Hackers draft and check whether the title, CTA, process evidence, self-promotion paragraphs, and community tone feel too promotional.",
+      "粘贴 Reddit、r/SaaS、r/indiehackers 或 Indie Hackers 草稿，检查标题、CTA、过程证据、自我推广段落与社区语气是否广告感过强。",
+      "貼上 Reddit、r/SaaS、r/indiehackers 或 Indie Hackers 草稿，檢查標題、CTA、過程證據、自我推廣段落與社群語氣是否廣告感過強。",
+    ),
+    intro: t(
+      "Run a pre-post risk review before publishing: see which paragraphs feel like ads, whether the CTA belongs in the body, comments, or nowhere, and what real process evidence is missing.",
+      "发布前做一轮风险复核：看哪些段落像广告、CTA 该放正文/评论/不放，以及还缺哪些真实过程证据。",
+      "發佈前做一輪風險複核：看哪些段落像廣告、CTA 該放正文／留言／不放，以及還缺哪些真實過程證據。",
+    ),
+    category: t("Community growth tools", "社区增长工具", "社群成長工具"),
+    keywords: list(
+      [
+        "community post risk checker",
+        "Reddit self promotion checker",
+        "r/SaaS post review tool",
+        "indie hackers post checker",
+        "startup community post review",
+      ],
+      [
+        "社区帖子风险检查",
+        "Reddit 自我推广检查",
+        "r/SaaS 发帖检查",
+        "Indie Hackers 帖子检查",
+        "创业社区发帖复核",
+      ],
+      [
+        "社群貼文風險檢查",
+        "Reddit 自我推廣檢查",
+        "r/SaaS 發文檢查",
+        "Indie Hackers 貼文檢查",
+        "創業社群發文複核",
+      ],
+    ),
+    inputSignal: t(
+      "Community post title + body draft + target community + CTA plan",
+      "帖子标题、正文草稿、目标社区与 CTA 计划",
+      "貼文標題、正文草稿、目標社群與 CTA 計畫",
+    ),
+    outputSignal: t(
+      "Risk score + paragraph flags + CTA placement + revision checklist",
+      "风险分数、问题段落、CTA 位置建议与重写清单",
+      "風險分數、問題段落、CTA 位置建議與改寫清單",
+    ),
+    boundarySignal: t(
+      "Public heuristic checker; reduces promotional risk, does not guarantee moderation outcomes",
+      "公开启发式检查；降低推广风险，不保证版主结果",
+      "公開啟發式檢查；降低推廣風險，不保證版主結果",
+    ),
+  },
+  form: [
+    {
+      kind: "text",
+      id: "title",
+      required: true,
+      minLength: 8,
+      maxLength: 180,
+      fullWidth: true,
+      label: t("Post title", "帖子标题", "貼文標題"),
+      placeholder: t(
+        "Example: I built an AI tool for SaaS founders, feedback?",
+        "例如：我做了一个给 SaaS 创始人用的 AI 工具，想听反馈",
+        "例如：我做了一個給 SaaS 創辦人用的 AI 工具，想聽回饋",
+      ),
+      invalidMessage: t(
+        "Add a real title (at least 8 characters).",
+        "请填写真实标题（至少 8 个字符）。",
+        "請填寫真實標題（至少 8 個字元）。",
+      ),
+    },
+    {
+      kind: "select",
+      id: "community",
+      required: true,
+      defaultValue: "redditSaas",
+      label: t("Target community", "目标社区", "目標社群"),
+      options: [
+        {
+          value: "redditSaas",
+          label: t("r/SaaS", "r/SaaS", "r/SaaS"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "redditIndieHackers",
+          label: t("r/indiehackers", "r/indiehackers", "r/indiehackers"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "indieHackers",
+          label: t("Indie Hackers", "Indie Hackers", "Indie Hackers"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "other",
+          label: t("Other community", "其他社区", "其他社群"),
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      kind: "select",
+      id: "goal",
+      required: true,
+      defaultValue: "askFeedback",
+      label: t("Post goal", "发帖目的", "發文目的"),
+      options: [
+        {
+          value: "askFeedback",
+          label: t("Ask for feedback", "征求反馈", "徵求回饋"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "shareLearning",
+          label: t("Share learning", "分享学习", "分享學習"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "launchUpdate",
+          label: t("Launch update", "发布进展", "發佈進展"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "findBeta",
+          label: t("Find beta users", "招募 Beta", "招募 Beta"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "askAdvice",
+          label: t("Ask advice", "请教建议", "請教建議"),
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      kind: "select",
+      id: "ctaPlan",
+      required: true,
+      defaultValue: "unsure",
+      label: t("CTA plan", "CTA 计划", "CTA 計畫"),
+      options: [
+        { value: "none", label: t("No CTA", "无 CTA", "無 CTA") },
+        {
+          value: "body",
+          label: t("CTA in body", "CTA 在正文", "CTA 在正文"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "comment",
+          label: t("CTA in comment", "CTA 在评论", "CTA 在留言"),
+        },
+        {
+          value: "onlyIfAsked",
+          label: t("Only if asked", "仅被问及时", "僅被問及時"),
+        },
+        { value: "unsure", label: t("Not sure", "不确定", "不確定") },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      kind: "textarea",
+      id: "postBody",
+      required: true,
+      rows: 10,
+      minLength: 120,
+      maxLength: 8000,
+      fullWidth: true,
+      label: t("Post body", "帖子正文", "貼文正文"),
+      hint: t(
+        "Paste the full draft, including links, asks, and the ending you plan to publish.",
+        "粘贴完整草稿，保留链接、请求和结尾，就像真实准备发布的版本。",
+        "貼上完整草稿，保留連結、請求與結尾，就像真實準備發佈的版本。",
+      ),
+      placeholder: t(
+        "Paste the full community post draft here…",
+        "把完整社区帖草稿粘贴到这里…",
+        "把完整社群貼文草稿貼到這裡…",
+      ),
+      invalidMessage: t(
+        "Paste a real body draft (at least 120 characters).",
+        "请粘贴足够长的真实正文（至少 120 个字符）。",
+        "請貼上足夠長的真實正文（至少 120 個字元）。",
+      ),
+    },
+  ],
+  runtime: {
+    lane: "instant",
+    compute: (values, locale) => toPackageResult(values, locale),
+  },
+  resultSchema,
+  resultView: [
+    {
+      block: "keyValues",
+      title: t("Risk summary", "风险摘要", "風險摘要"),
+      items: [
+        {
+          label: t("Risk score", "风险分数", "風險分數"),
+          path: "riskScoreDisplay",
+          copyable: true,
+        },
+        {
+          label: t("Risk level", "风险等级", "風險等級"),
+          path: "riskLevelLabel",
+        },
+        {
+          label: t("Verdict", "结论", "結論"),
+          path: "verdict",
+        },
+        {
+          label: t("Primary fix", "首要修改", "首要修改"),
+          path: "primaryFix",
+        },
+        {
+          label: t("Recommended CTA", "建议 CTA", "建議 CTA"),
+          path: "recommendedCta",
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      block: "keyValues",
+      title: t("CTA recommendation", "CTA 建议", "CTA 建議"),
+      items: [
+        {
+          label: t("Why", "原因", "原因"),
+          path: "ctaRationale",
+        },
+        {
+          label: t("Safer alternative", "更安全做法", "更安全做法"),
+          path: "saferAlternative",
+        },
+      ],
+    },
+    {
+      block: "cardList",
+      title: t("Risk checks", "风险检查项", "風險檢查項"),
+      path: "checks",
+      layout: "stack",
+      card: {
+        titleField: "title",
+        metaField: "meta",
+        body: { field: "reason" },
+        footer: { field: "fix", label: t("Fix", "修复建议", "修復建議") },
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      block: "cardList",
+      title: t(
+        "Paragraphs that may read as self-promotion",
+        "可能被读成 self-promotion 的段落",
+        "可能被讀成 self-promotion 的段落",
+      ),
+      path: "flaggedParagraphs",
+      layout: "stack",
+      card: {
+        titleField: "title",
+        body: {
+          field: "excerpt",
+          label: t("Excerpt", "摘录", "摘錄"),
+        },
+        footer: {
+          field: "suggestion",
+          label: t("Suggestion", "修改建议", "修改建議"),
+        },
+        lists: [
+          {
+            field: "reasons",
+            label: t("Why flagged", "为何标记", "為何標記"),
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      block: "bulletList",
+      title: t("Revision plan", "修改清单", "修改清單"),
+      path: "revisionPlan",
+      tone: "risk",
+    },
+    {
+      block: "bulletList",
+      title: t("Missing process evidence", "缺失的过程证据", "缺失的過程證據"),
+      path: "missingInfo",
+      tone: "neutral",
+    },
+    {
+      block: "bulletList",
+      title: t("Review checklist", "发布前复核清单", "發佈前複核清單"),
+      path: "reviewChecklist",
+      tone: "positive",
+    },
+  ],
+  widget: {
+    formTitle: t("Pre-post risk review", "发布前风险检查", "發佈前風險檢查"),
+    formHint: t(
+      "The checker looks for title hype, early CTA, missing process, Reddit-style self-promotion signals, and unclear disclosure.",
+      "检查标题广告感、过早 CTA、真实过程缺失、Reddit 风格 self-promotion 信号和身份说明问题。",
+      "檢查標題廣告感、過早 CTA、真實過程缺失、Reddit 風格 self-promotion 訊號和身分說明問題。",
+    ),
+    submitLabel: t("Check risk", "检查风险", "檢查風險"),
+    resultTitle: t("Risk report", "风险报告", "風險報告"),
+    errorOverrides: {
+      computeFailed: {
+        title: t("Needs a real draft", "需要真实草稿", "需要真實草稿"),
+        body: t(
+          "This looks too short or placeholder-like. Paste the actual post draft you would publish.",
+          "内容过短或像占位文本。请粘贴你真实准备发布的帖子草稿。",
+          "內容過短或像佔位文字。請貼上你真實準備發佈的貼文草稿。",
+        ),
+      },
+      validation: {
+        title: t("Add a real draft", "请补充真实草稿", "請補充真實草稿"),
+        body: t(
+          "Add a real title and body before checking. The body should be long enough to judge context and CTA placement.",
+          "检查前请填写真实标题和正文。正文需要足够长，才能判断语境与 CTA 位置。",
+          "檢查前請填寫真實標題和正文。正文需要足夠長，才能判斷語境與 CTA 位置。",
+        ),
+      },
+    },
+  },
+  page: {
+    workspace: {
+      heading: t(
+        "Check whether a community post reads like an ad",
+        "检查社区帖是否读起来像广告",
+        "檢查社群貼文是否讀起來像廣告",
+      ),
+      hint: t(
+        "Paste a draft from any generator or your own notes. The checker scores promotion risk, flags risky paragraphs, and recommends where the CTA belongs before you post.",
+        "粘贴任意生成器或自写草稿。检查器会打分、标记风险段落，并在发帖前建议 CTA 位置。",
+        "貼上任意產生器或自寫草稿。檢查器會打分、標記風險段落，並在發文前建議 CTA 位置。",
+      ),
+      badge: t("Public SEO tool", "公开 SEO 工具", "公開 SEO 工具"),
+    },
+    standard: {
+      benefits: {
+        title: t(
+          "What the checker returns",
+          "检查器会返回什么",
+          "檢查器會回傳什麼",
+        ),
+        cards: [
+          {
+            title: t("Promotion risk score", "推广风险分数", "推廣風險分數"),
+            body: t(
+              "A 0-100 risk score across title hype, CTA timing, process evidence, tone, self-promotion, and disclosure.",
+              "覆盖标题广告感、CTA 时机、过程证据、语气、自我推广与披露的 0–100 风险分。",
+              "涵蓋標題廣告感、CTA 時機、過程證據、語氣、自我推廣與揭露的 0–100 風險分。",
+            ),
+          },
+          {
+            title: t("Paragraph flags", "段落标记", "段落標記"),
+            body: t(
+              "Specific body sections that look like self-promotion, early CTA, or product marketing to community readers.",
+              "标出在社区读者眼中像自我推广、过早 CTA 或产品营销的正文段落。",
+              "標出在社群讀者眼中像自我推廣、過早 CTA 或產品行銷的正文段落。",
+            ),
+          },
+          {
+            title: t("CTA + revision plan", "CTA 与修改清单", "CTA 與修改清單"),
+            body: t(
+              "A recommendation for CTA placement plus concrete edits that make the post feel more like a founder story.",
+              "给出 CTA 位置建议，以及让帖子更像创始人故事的具体修改项。",
+              "給出 CTA 位置建議，以及讓貼文更像創辦人故事的具體修改項。",
+            ),
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      imageTextSections: [
+        {
+          id: "section-primary",
+          title: t(
+            "Use it before Reddit and Indie Hackers posts",
+            "在 Reddit 与 Indie Hackers 发帖前使用",
+            "在 Reddit 與 Indie Hackers 發文前使用",
+          ),
+          body: list(
+            [
+              "Review drafts for r/SaaS, r/indiehackers, Indie Hackers, founder forums, and small niche communities.",
+              "Catch the common failure mode: the post is useful in your head, but reads like a launch announcement to everyone else.",
+              "Turn the post back toward a real process: what you tried, what failed, what changed, and what you are asking.",
+            ],
+            [
+              "适合复核 r/SaaS、r/indiehackers、Indie Hackers、创始人论坛和小众社区草稿。",
+              "抓住常见翻车点：自己觉得有用，别人读起来却像发布会。",
+              "把帖子拉回真实过程：试了什么、失败了什么、改了什么、现在想问什么。",
+            ],
+            [
+              "適合複核 r/SaaS、r/indiehackers、Indie Hackers、創辦人論壇和小眾社群草稿。",
+              "抓住常見翻車點：自己覺得有用，別人讀起來卻像發表會。",
+              "把貼文拉回真實過程：試了什麼、失敗了什麼、改了什麼、現在想問什麼。",
+            ],
+          ),
+          image: {
+            src: "/tools/community-post-risk-checker-use-case.webp",
+            alt: t(
+              "Founder community post workflow with safer CTA placement and process evidence",
+              "更安全 CTA 位置与过程证据的创始人社区发帖流程",
+              "更安全 CTA 位置與過程證據的創辦人社群發文流程",
+            ),
+            side: "left",
+          },
+          imageFirst: true,
+        },
+        {
+          id: "section-variation",
+          title: t(
+            "It reduces risk; it does not guarantee approval",
+            "它降低风险，但不保证过审",
+            "它降低風險，但不保證過審",
+          ),
+          body: list(
+            [
+              "The checker is a heuristic pre-post review, not a Reddit or Indie Hackers moderation engine.",
+              "It should not be framed as a way to bypass platform rules or hide commercial intent.",
+              "The safest Tomako workflow is still automatic: generated posts should pass this kind of check before the user sees them.",
+            ],
+            [
+              "检查器是启发式发布前复核，不是 Reddit 或 Indie Hackers 的版主引擎。",
+              "不应把它说成绕过平台规则或隐藏商业意图的手段。",
+              "Tomako 内部最稳妥的流程仍是自动门禁：生成帖在展示给用户前先过类似检查。",
+            ],
+            [
+              "檢查器是啟發式發佈前複核，不是 Reddit 或 Indie Hackers 的版主引擎。",
+              "不應把它說成繞過平台規則或隱藏商業意圖的手段。",
+              "Tomako 內部最穩妥的流程仍是自動門禁：產生貼文在展示給使用者前先過類似檢查。",
+            ],
+          ),
+          image: {
+            src: "/tools/community-post-risk-checker-boundary.webp",
+            alt: t(
+              "Decision flow from draft review to revision with platform moderation boundaries",
+              "从草稿复核到修改的决策流，并标出版主边界",
+              "從草稿複核到修改的決策流，並標出版主邊界",
+            ),
+            side: "right",
+          },
+        },
+        {
+          id: "section-support",
+          title: t(
+            "Why this works as an acquisition page",
+            "为什么适合作为获客页",
+            "為什麼適合作為獲客頁",
+          ),
+          body: list(
+            [
+              "Search intent is problem-aware: users already fear that a post may look like self-promotion.",
+              "The tool gives immediate value without requiring users to understand Tomako's full workspace first.",
+              "It creates a natural bridge from public SEO traffic into Tomako's community post and build-in-public workflows.",
+            ],
+            [
+              "搜索意图是问题意识型：用户已经担心帖子会被读成自我推广。",
+              "工具能立刻给价值，用户不必先理解整个 Tomako 工作台。",
+              "它把公开 SEO 流量自然接到社区帖与 build-in-public 工作流。",
+            ],
+            [
+              "搜尋意圖是問題意識型：使用者已經擔心貼文會被讀成自我推廣。",
+              "工具能立刻給價值，使用者不必先理解整個 Tomako 工作台。",
+              "它把公開 SEO 流量自然接到社群貼文與 build-in-public 工作流。",
+            ],
+          ),
+          image: {
+            src: "/tools/community-post-risk-checker-value.webp",
+            alt: t(
+              "Risk analysis report showing title, CTA, process, tone, and transparency checks",
+              "展示标题、CTA、过程、语气与透明度检查的风险分析报告",
+              "展示標題、CTA、過程、語氣與透明度檢查的風險分析報告",
+            ),
+            side: "left",
+          },
+          imageFirst: true,
+        },
+      ],
+      generation: {
+        title: t(
+          "Review standard before you post",
+          "发帖前按标准复核",
+          "發文前按標準複核",
+        ),
+        image: {
+          src: "/tools/community-post-risk-checker-standard.webp",
+          alt: t(
+            "Checklist report for promotional title, early CTA, missing process, and disclosure",
+            "覆盖标题广告感、早期 CTA、过程缺失与披露的检查清单",
+            "涵蓋標題廣告感、早期 CTA、過程缺失與揭露的檢查清單",
+          ),
+          side: "left",
+        },
+        steps: [
+          {
+            title: t(
+              "Paste the real draft",
+              "粘贴真实草稿",
+              "貼上真實草稿",
+            ),
+            body: t(
+              "Include the title, body, links, and ending exactly as you would publish them.",
+              "标题、正文、链接和结尾按真实发布版本一并粘贴。",
+              "標題、正文、連結和結尾按真實發佈版本一併貼上。",
+            ),
+          },
+          {
+            title: t(
+              "Read the score and flags",
+              "阅读分数与标记",
+              "閱讀分數與標記",
+            ),
+            body: t(
+              "Focus on high-risk checks, flagged paragraphs, and the recommended CTA placement.",
+              "优先看高风险检查项、标记段落和建议的 CTA 位置。",
+              "優先看高風險檢查項、標記段落和建議的 CTA 位置。",
+            ),
+          },
+          {
+            title: t(
+              "Revise, then re-check",
+              "修改后再检查",
+              "修改後再檢查",
+            ),
+            body: t(
+              "Apply the revision plan, confirm community rules, then run the checker again before submitting.",
+              "按修改清单改稿、核对社区规则，提交前再跑一遍检查。",
+              "按修改清單改稿、核對社群規則，提交前再跑一遍檢查。",
+            ),
+          },
+        ],
+        ctaLabel: t("Check my draft", "检查帖子草稿", "檢查貼文草稿"),
+      },
+      faq: {
+        title: t(
+          "Community post risk checker FAQs",
+          "社区帖子风险检查常见问题",
+          "社群貼文風險檢查常見問題",
+        ),
+        intro: t(
+          "Use the report as a pre-post review, not as a guarantee that moderators will approve the post.",
+          "把报告当作发布前复核，而不是版主一定会通过的保证。",
+          "把報告當作發佈前複核，而不是版主一定會通過的保證。",
+        ),
+        ctaLabel: t("Check risk now", "立即检查风险", "立即檢查風險"),
+      },
+    },
+    faq: [
+      {
+        question: t(
+          "Can this guarantee that Reddit will not remove my post?",
+          "它能保证 Reddit 不删帖吗？",
+          "它能保證 Reddit 不刪文嗎？",
+        ),
+        answer: t(
+          "No. It is a pre-post risk review based on common community signals. Subreddit rules and moderator judgment still decide the outcome.",
+          "不能。它只是基于常见社区信号做发布前风险检查，最终仍取决于具体社区规则和版主判断。",
+          "不能。它只是基於常見社群訊號做發佈前風險檢查，最終仍取決於具體社群規則和版主判斷。",
+        ),
+      },
+      {
+        question: t(
+          "Should this be inside Tomako's post generator too?",
+          "这个能力也应该在 Tomako 生成器内部吗？",
+          "這個能力也應該在 Tomako 產生器內部嗎？",
+        ),
+        answer: t(
+          "Yes. The public tool is for external drafts and SEO acquisition; Tomako-generated posts should pass a similar gate before final output.",
+          "应该。公开工具适合外部草稿和 SEO 获客；Tomako 自己生成的帖子，应该在输出前自动过类似质量门。",
+          "應該。公開工具適合外部草稿和 SEO 獲客；Tomako 自己產生的貼文，應該在輸出前自動過類似品質門。",
+        ),
+      },
+      {
+        question: t(
+          "Why check CTA placement separately?",
+          "为什么要单独检查 CTA 位置？",
+          "為什麼要單獨檢查 CTA 位置？",
+        ),
+        answer: t(
+          "A useful founder story can become self-promotion the moment a signup link appears too early. Placement changes the perceived intent.",
+          "一篇真实复盘可能因为注册链接出现太早，瞬间被读成 self-promotion。位置会改变读者对意图的判断。",
+          "一篇真實復盤可能因為註冊連結出現太早，瞬間被讀成 self-promotion。位置會改變讀者對意圖的判斷。",
+        ),
+      },
+      {
+        question: t(
+          "Does it support Chinese drafts?",
+          "支持中文草稿吗？",
+          "支援中文草稿嗎？",
+        ),
+        answer: t(
+          "Yes. The interface follows your current locale and the heuristic checks include Chinese and English promotional signals.",
+          "支持。界面跟随当前语言，启发式检查也包含中文和英文的推广信号。",
+          "支援。介面跟隨目前語言，啟發式檢查也包含中文和英文的推廣訊號。",
+        ),
+      },
+    ],
+  },
+  assets: {},
+};