@monoes/monomindcli 2.15.3 → 2.15.5

package/org-skills/social-content/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,416 @@
+---
+name: social-content
+description: "When the user wants help creating, scheduling, or optimizing social media content for LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, or other platforms, or wants to do social listening and engagement triage."
+tags: ["marketing","writing"]
+tools: []
+license: MIT
+source: https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills
+source_path: "skills/social"
+source_commit: 5b2c0007766c6a1cf1d53fd8fc73e979e0821022
+---
+# Social Content
+
+You are an expert social media strategist. Your goal is to help create engaging content that builds audience, drives engagement, and supports business goals.
+
+## Before Creating Content
+
+**Check for product marketing context first:**
+If `.agents/product-marketing.md` exists (or `.claude/product-marketing.md`, or the legacy `product-marketing-context.md` filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
+
+Gather this context (ask if not provided):
+
+### 1. Goals
+- What's the primary objective? (Brand awareness, leads, traffic, community)
+- What action do you want people to take?
+- Are you building personal brand, company brand, or both?
+
+### 2. Audience
+- Who are you trying to reach?
+- What platforms are they most active on?
+- What content do they engage with?
+
+### 3. Brand Voice
+- What's your tone? (Professional, casual, witty, authoritative)
+- Any topics to avoid?
+- Any specific terminology or style guidelines?
+
+### 4. Resources
+- How much time can you dedicate to social?
+- Do you have existing content to repurpose?
+- Can you create video content?
+
+---
+
+## Platform Quick Reference
+
+| Platform | Best For | Frequency | Key Format |
+|----------|----------|-----------|------------|
+| LinkedIn | B2B, thought leadership | 3-5x/week | Carousels, stories |
+| Twitter/X | Tech, real-time, community | 3-10x/day | Threads, hot takes |
+| Instagram | Visual brands, lifestyle | 1-2 posts + Stories daily | Reels, carousels |
+| TikTok | Brand awareness, younger audiences | 1-4x/day | Short-form video |
+| Facebook | Communities, local businesses | 1-2x/day | Groups, native video |
+
+**For detailed platform strategies**: See [references/platforms.md](references/platforms.md)
+
+**For hashtag limits and character counts**: See [references/platform-limits.md](references/platform-limits.md)
+
+---
+
+## Content Pillars Framework
+
+Build your content around 3-5 pillars that align with your expertise and audience interests.
+
+### Example for a SaaS Founder
+
+| Pillar | % of Content | Topics |
+|--------|--------------|--------|
+| Industry insights | 30% | Trends, data, predictions |
+| Behind-the-scenes | 25% | Building the company, lessons learned |
+| Educational | 25% | How-tos, frameworks, tips |
+| Personal | 15% | Stories, values, hot takes |
+| Promotional | 5% | Product updates, offers |
+
+### Pillar Development Questions
+
+For each pillar, ask:
+1. What unique perspective do you have?
+2. What questions does your audience ask?
+3. What content has performed well before?
+4. What can you create consistently?
+5. What aligns with business goals?
+
+---
+
+## Hook Formulas
+
+The first line determines whether anyone reads the rest.
+
+### Curiosity Hooks
+- "I was wrong about [common belief]."
+- "The real reason [outcome] happens isn't what you think."
+- "[Impressive result] — and it only took [surprisingly short time]."
+
+### Story Hooks
+- "Last week, [unexpected thing] happened."
+- "I almost [big mistake/failure]."
+- "3 years ago, I [past state]. Today, [current state]."
+
+### Value Hooks
+- "How to [desirable outcome] (without [common pain]):"
+- "[Number] [things] that [outcome]:"
+- "Stop [common mistake]. Do this instead:"
+
+### Contrarian Hooks
+- "Unpopular opinion: [bold statement]"
+- "[Common advice] is wrong. Here's why:"
+- "I stopped [common practice] and [positive result]."
+
+**For post templates and more hooks**: See [references/post-templates.md](references/post-templates.md)
+
+**For carousels** (Instagram carousels, LinkedIn document posts): See [references/carousel-frameworks.md](references/carousel-frameworks.md) — five slide-by-slide narrative architectures (Value-Stack, Problem-Proof, Hack List, Rant Callout, Demo Walkthrough) with framework selection guidance, per-slide copy slots, platform notes, and a production checklist. Pick the framework before writing slides.
+
+---
+
+## Content Repurposing System
+
+Turn one piece of content into many. The best social content isn't created from scratch — it's extracted from longer-form pillar content and adapted to each platform.
+
+### Blog Post → Social Content
+
+| Platform | Format |
+|----------|--------|
+| LinkedIn | Key insight + link in comments |
+| LinkedIn | Carousel of main points |
+| Twitter/X | Thread of key takeaways |
+| Instagram | Carousel with visuals |
+| Instagram | Reel summarizing the post |
+
+### Podcast / Video → Social Content
+
+Extract "content atoms" — self-contained moments from any long-form content that work on their own:
+
+| Atom Type | What to Look For | Best Platform |
+|-----------|-----------------|---------------|
+| Quotable moment | A bold claim, hot take, or memorable line (15-60 sec) | Twitter/X, LinkedIn, TikTok |
+| Story arc | A complete mini-story with setup, conflict, resolution (60-90 sec) | Instagram Reels, TikTok, YouTube Shorts |
+| Tactical tip | A specific how-to or framework explained clearly (30-60 sec) | LinkedIn, YouTube Shorts |
+| Controversial take | A contrarian opinion that sparks debate | Twitter/X, LinkedIn |
+| Data/stat callout | A surprising number or research finding | LinkedIn carousel, Twitter/X |
+| Behind-the-scenes | Authentic, unpolished moments | Instagram Stories, TikTok |
+
+**Podcast repurposing workflow:**
+1. **Get transcript** — use Whisper, Descript, or your podcast host's transcription
+2. **Mark timestamps** — flag the 5-10 best moments while listening or scanning transcript
+3. **Extract clips** — pull video/audio clips for each moment (Descript, Opus Clip, or manual)
+4. **Write standalone captions** — each clip needs context; don't assume the viewer heard the rest
+5. **Add subtitles** — most social video is watched without sound
+6. **Schedule across 1-2 weeks** — spread a single episode across multiple posts
+
+**Per episode, aim for:**
+- 3-5 short video clips or audiograms (15-60 sec) for Reels/TikTok/Shorts
+- 1-2 LinkedIn text posts from key insights
+- 1 Twitter/X thread of takeaways
+- 1 carousel summarizing the main framework or list
+- 1 newsletter section or blog post from the best segment
+
+### Webinar / Live Event → Social Content
+
+| Extract | Format |
+|---------|--------|
+| Key slides with commentary | LinkedIn carousel |
+| Q&A highlights | Twitter/X thread |
+| Speaker quotes | Quote graphics for Instagram/LinkedIn |
+| Audience reactions/poll results | Engagement posts |
+| Full recording → short clips | Reels, TikTok, Shorts |
+
+### Newsletter → Social Content
+
+| Extract | Format |
+|---------|--------|
+| Main insight | LinkedIn post |
+| Curated links with commentary | Twitter/X thread |
+| Data or stat | Quote graphic |
+| Hot take or opinion | Twitter/X post, LinkedIn |
+
+### Repurposing Workflow
+
+1. **Create pillar content** (blog, video, podcast, webinar, newsletter)
+2. **Extract content atoms** (5-10 per piece — quotes, stories, tips, data)
+3. **Adapt to each platform** (format, length, and tone)
+4. **Write standalone captions** (each post must work without context)
+5. **Schedule across the week** (spread distribution, don't dump all at once)
+6. **Update and reshare** (evergreen content can repeat every 3-6 months)
+
+---
+
+## Content Calendar Structure
+
+### Weekly Planning Template
+
+| Day | LinkedIn | Twitter/X | Instagram |
+|-----|----------|-----------|-----------|
+| Mon | Industry insight | Thread | Carousel |
+| Tue | Behind-scenes | Engagement | Story |
+| Wed | Educational | Tips tweet | Reel |
+| Thu | Story post | Thread | Educational |
+| Fri | Hot take | Engagement | Story |
+
+### Batching Strategy (2-3 hours weekly)
+
+1. Review content pillar topics
+2. Write 5 LinkedIn posts
+3. Write 3 Twitter threads + daily tweets
+4. Create Instagram carousel + Reel ideas
+5. Schedule everything
+6. Leave room for real-time engagement
+
+---
+
+## Engagement Strategy
+
+### Daily Engagement Routine (30 min)
+
+1. Respond to all comments on your posts (5 min)
+2. Comment on 5-10 posts from target accounts (15 min)
+3. Share/repost with added insight (5 min)
+4. Send 2-3 DMs to new connections (5 min)
+
+**For surfacing *which* posts to comment on** (top-10 daily lists, brand/competitor monitoring, intent-signal triage), see [references/listening.md](references/listening.md). Includes a scoring rubric and curl recipes for Reddit, Hacker News, and Bluesky.
+
+### Quality Comments
+
+- Add new insight, not just "Great post!"
+- Share a related experience
+- Ask a thoughtful follow-up question
+- Respectfully disagree with nuance
+
+### Building Relationships
+
+- Identify 20-50 accounts in your space
+- Consistently engage with their content
+- Share their content with credit
+- Eventually collaborate (podcasts, co-created content)
+
+---
+
+## Analytics & Optimization
+
+### Metrics That Matter
+
+**Awareness:** Impressions, Reach, Follower growth rate
+
+**Engagement:** Engagement rate, Comments (higher value than likes), Shares/reposts, Saves
+
+**Conversion:** Link clicks, Profile visits, DMs received, Leads attributed
+
+### Weekly Review
+
+- Top 3 performing posts (why did they work?)
+- Bottom 3 posts (what can you learn?)
+- Follower growth trend
+- Engagement rate trend
+- Best posting times (from data)
+
+### Optimization Actions
+
+**If engagement is low:**
+- Test new hooks
+- Post at different times
+- Try different formats
+- Increase engagement with others
+
+**If reach is declining:**
+- Avoid external links in post body
+- Increase posting frequency
+- Engage more in comments
+- Test video/visual content
+
+---
+
+## Content Ideas by Situation
+
+### When You're Starting Out
+- Document your journey
+- Share what you're learning
+- Curate and comment on industry content
+- Engage heavily with established accounts
+
+### When You're Stuck
+- Repurpose old high-performing content
+- Ask your audience what they want
+- Comment on industry news
+- Share a failure or lesson learned
+
+---
+
+## Scheduling Best Practices
+
+### When to Schedule vs. Post Live
+
+**Schedule:** Core content posts, Threads, Carousels, Evergreen content
+
+**Post live:** Real-time commentary, Responses to news/trends, Engagement with others
+
+### Queue Management
+
+- Maintain 1-2 weeks of scheduled content
+- Review queue weekly for relevance
+- Leave gaps for spontaneous posts
+- Adjust timing based on performance data
+
+---
+
+## Reverse Engineering Viral Content
+
+Instead of guessing, analyze what's working for top creators in your niche:
+
+1. **Find creators** — 10-20 accounts with high engagement
+2. **Collect data** — 500+ posts for analysis
+3. **Analyze patterns** — Hooks, formats, CTAs that work
+4. **Codify playbook** — Document repeatable patterns
+5. **Layer your voice** — Apply patterns with authenticity
+6. **Convert** — Bridge attention to business results
+
+**For the complete framework**: See [references/reverse-engineering.md](references/reverse-engineering.md)
+
+---
+
+## Short-Form Video (TikTok, Reels, Shorts)
+
+Short-form video is the highest-reach format on every major platform. These frameworks apply whether you're creating for TikTok, Instagram Reels, or YouTube Shorts.
+
+### Platform Specs
+
+| Platform | Optimal Length | Aspect Ratio | Key Difference |
+|----------|---------------|--------------|----------------|
+| TikTok | 15-60 sec | 9:16 | Trending sounds, raw/authentic feel |
+| Reels | 15-30 sec | 9:16 | Polished content, rewards saves/shares |
+| Shorts | 30-60 sec | 9:16 | YouTube SEO applies, searchable titles |
+
+### The 3-Second Rule
+
+You have 3 seconds to stop the scroll. Every video needs three simultaneous hooks:
+
+```
+[VISUAL HOOK] + [VERBAL HOOK] + [TEXT OVERLAY]
+```
+
+All three should hit in the first second.
+
+### Video Structures
+
+**Problem-Solution (15-30 sec):**
+```
+[0-3s]  Hook: State the problem
+[3-10s] Agitate: Why it matters
+[10-25s] Solution: Your method/product/tip
+[25-30s] CTA: What to do next
+```
+
+**List Format (30-60 sec):**
+```
+[0-3s]  Hook: "X things that [outcome]"
+[3-50s] Items: One every 5-8 seconds
+[50-60s] CTA
+```
+
+**Tutorial (30-60 sec):**
+```
+[0-3s]  Hook: Show the end result first
+[3-8s]  Overview: "Here's how..."
+[8-50s] Steps: Quick, clear instructions
+[50-60s] Result + CTA
+```
+
+### Caption & Subtitle Best Practices
+
+Captions increase watch time by 25-40%. Most social video is watched without sound.
+
+- **MAX 2 lines** on screen at once
+- **3-5 words per line**
+- Bold, sans-serif font with black outline
+- **Highlight key words** in a different color
+- Match timing to speech exactly
+
+Tools: CapCut (free), Descript, Captions.ai, Premiere Pro
+
+### Content Ideas by Type
+
+| Business Type | Video Ideas |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| SaaS | Feature demos (show outcome first), before/after, "Watch me do X in Y seconds" |
+| E-commerce | Unboxing, comparisons, how it's made, customer reviews |
+| Services | Process reveals, client transformations, myth-busting |
+| Personal brand | Lessons learned, controversial takes, day-in-the-life |
+
+### Common Mistakes
+
+1. **Slow hooks** — don't build up to the point
+2. **No text overlay** — many watch without sound
+3. **Poor audio** — bad audio kills retention instantly
+4. **Too long** — if it can be shorter, make it shorter
+5. **No CTA** — tell viewers what to do
+6. **Ignoring comments** — engagement in first hour matters
+
+**For video hook formulas and scripting templates**: See [references/short-form-video.md](references/short-form-video.md)
+
+---
+
+## Task-Specific Questions
+
+1. What platform(s) are you focusing on?
+2. What's your current posting frequency?
+3. Do you have existing content to repurpose?
+4. What content has performed well in the past?
+5. How much time can you dedicate weekly?
+6. Are you building personal brand, company brand, or both?
+
+---
+
+## Related Skills
+
+- **copywriting**: For longer-form content that feeds social
+- **launch**: For coordinating social with launches
+- **emails**: For nurturing social audience via email
+- **marketing-psychology**: For understanding what drives engagement

package/org-skills/social-content/references/carousel-frameworks.md

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+# Carousel Frameworks
+
+Five slide-by-slide narrative architectures for carousels — Instagram carousels and LinkedIn document posts. Each framework is a different *reason to keep swiping*; picking the right one for the content matters more than polishing individual slides.
+
+A carousel is not a blog post chopped into squares. It's a swipe-through with two jobs per slide: deliver one idea, and make the next swipe irresistible. These frameworks encode structures that show up repeatedly in high-performing carousels; treat them as starting structures to adapt, not rigid formulas — and expect to validate against your own analytics.
+
+## Picking a Framework
+
+| Your content is... | Use | Why |
+|---|---|---|
+| A list of resources, tools, or tips | **A: Value-Stack** | Completeness is the promise; the count is the hook |
+| A personal result with a system behind it | **B: Problem-Proof** | Proof opens and closes the loop; the system is the meat |
+| Several named techniques on one theme | **C: Hack List** | Each hack re-earns the swipe independently |
+| A strong opinion about a common practice | **D: Rant Callout** | Conviction is the content; structure keeps it fair |
+| A product or workflow you can show | **E: Demo Walkthrough** | Seeing the steps is more persuasive than describing them |
+
+Two cross-framework rules before the specifics:
+
+- **Slide 1 is the thumbnail.** It competes in the feed alone, before anyone knows a carousel follows. Design and write it as a standalone scroll-stopper.
+- **One visual template per carousel.** Same layout, type scale, and palette on every interior slide. Variety between slides reads as clutter; consistency lets the *content* change while the frame stays still.
+
+---
+
+## Framework A: Value-Stack (4–14 slides)
+
+The "everything you need" carousel. Works because the cover makes a completeness claim — an exact count and an exact deliverable — and every swipe pays it down.
+
+| Slide | Job | Pattern |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 — Cover | State the exact count + exact deliverable. Specificity proves scale upfront. | "[N] [resource type] for [role/outcome]" |
+| 2 to N−1 — Value delivery | One item or category per slide, 3–6 concrete sub-items each. Same visual template, zero filler slides. | "[Category/item] — [sub-items]" |
+| N — Close | Convert the swipe-through into an action. | "[Action] for [the payoff]" — comment a keyword, follow, link in bio |
+
+**Why the exact count matters:** "27 free tools" outperforms "the best free tools" because a number is a checkable promise — the reader can verify you delivered. Rounding up with padding breaks the trust the count created.
+
+*SaaS example:* "12 ChatGPT prompts for SaaS onboarding emails" → one prompt per slide with the use case → "Comment PROMPTS and I'll send the full doc."
+
+**Failure mode:** filler slides to hit a bigger number. Cut to the real count; a tight 8 beats a padded 14.
+
+---
+
+## Framework B: Problem-Proof (6–10 slides)
+
+The "I did X, here's the system" carousel. The hook is a *result stated as fact*, not advice — and the final slide shows the receipt, closing the loop slide 1 opened.
+
+| Slide | Job | Pattern |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 — Hook | A specific personal claim with a number. A result, not a tip. | "[I/we did X]. [Specific result, with number]." |
+| 2 — Reframe the problem | Name what's *actually* going wrong so the reader recognizes themselves. | "The real problem — [named issue]" |
+| 3–4 — The mechanism | Show the real system: named tools, named steps. Concrete beats vague. | "The system — [named tools/steps]" |
+| 5 to N−1 — The detail | The literal prompt text, template, or step-by-step. This is the save-worthy part. | "[The literal prompt or process detail]" |
+| N — Proof | The actual output artifact. A screenshot, not a description. | "[Screenshot of output] — the receipt" |
+
+**The open loop is the engine:** slide 1 makes a claim, the last slide proves it, and everything between explains how. Readers swipe to see whether the receipt is real.
+
+*SaaS example:* "We cut churn 22% with one onboarding email." → the real problem (activation, not price) → the sequence structure → the literal email copy → the retention chart.
+
+**Failure mode:** vague mechanism slides ("optimize your workflow") — if the middle slides don't name tools and steps, the proof slide reads as luck, not system.
+
+---
+
+## Framework C: Hack List (6–10 slides)
+
+The "numbered techniques" carousel. A contrarian cover creates status anxiety — most people are doing this wrong — and each numbered hack independently re-earns the swipe.
+
+| Slide | Job | Pattern |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 — Contrarian hook | A stat or claim implying most people fail at this. | "[Stat implying most people fail at X]" |
+| 2 — The problem | Why the common approach fails, ideally with an analogy. | "The problem — [why it fails]" |
+| 3 to N−1 — Numbered hacks | One named technique per slide. Bad-vs-good contrast makes each hack land instantly. | "Hack #[n] — [named technique]" |
+| N — Synthesis + close | A one-line thesis tying the hacks together, then a save/share/follow CTA. | "[Thesis tying hacks together]" + [CTA] |
+
+**Name every technique.** "The 3-second rule" is shareable and memorable; "keep it short" is neither. Named techniques travel — people repeat them and credit the source.
+
+*SaaS example:* "90% of trial emails never get opened." → why (they read like receipts, not messages) → Hack #1: The founder-from line, Hack #2: The one-question subject, ... → "Trial emails are conversations, not confirmations. Save this for your next sequence."
+
+**Failure mode:** hacks that are restatements of each other. Each slide must survive alone — if two hacks collapse into one idea, merge them and go shorter.
+
+---
+
+## Framework D: Rant Callout (4–8 slides)
+
+The "someone had to say it" carousel. Personality-led and polarizing by design — the structure exists to keep the heat *fair* so it reads as conviction, not bitterness.
+
+| Slide | Job | Pattern |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 — Provocative claim | An unpopular opinion or direct accusation about a common practice. | "Unpopular opinion — [common practice]" |
+| 2 to N−2 — Escalate the argument | Sensory, specific detail. Show the offense; don't gesture at it abstractly. Each slide raises the stakes. | "[Escalating, specific complaint]" |
+| N−1 — Fairness pivot | "Don't get me wrong…" — clarify what you're *not* attacking. Anti-laziness, not anti-tool; anti-practice, not anti-person. | "The problem isn't [X], it's [Y]" |
+| N — Close | Firm, personality-forward sign-off. Signed rants read as owned opinions; anonymous ones read as potshots. | "[Firm sign-off] — signed [name/persona]" |
+
+**The fairness pivot is what makes it work.** Without it you're yelling; with it you're drawing a precise line, and precise lines get quoted. It also pre-empts the top hostile comment.
+
+*SaaS example:* "Your AI-generated LinkedIn posts are costing you customers." → the specifics (same em-dash cadence, same 'game-changer' vocabulary, zero lived detail) → "Don't get me wrong — I use AI daily. The problem isn't the tool, it's publishing the first draft." → "Write like you talk. — [Name]"
+
+**Failure modes:** skipping the pivot (reads unhinged, invites pile-ons), or ranting about something your own product/content visibly does (the comments will find it).
+
+---
+
+## Framework E: Demo Walkthrough (5–11 slides)
+
+The "watch it work" carousel for product or workflow content. Show the finished result first, then the steps — the outcome earns attention for the process.
+
+| Slide | Job | Pattern |
+|---|---|---|
+| 1 — Product + outcome | Brand/product plus the finished result. Lead with what they get. | "[Product] + [outcome], finished result" |
+| 2 — Problem it solves | The specific frustration this replaces. | "[The specific pain this replaces]" |
+| 3 — Process overview | The numbered step list, shown *before* the detail. Seeing the whole path lowers mid-swipe drop-off — readers commit when they know how long the road is. | "[N] steps to [outcome] in [timeframe]" |
+| 4 to N−1 — Step-by-step | One real UI screenshot per step with a short caption. Real screenshots; mockups read as vaporware. | "Step [n] — [screenshot] — [caption]" |
+| N — Result + positioning | The full-size output plus one brand-philosophy line. | "[Final output] + [positioning line]" |
+
+**Overview-before-detail is the key move** (same reason recipe sites list ingredients before instructions): a reader who's seen "4 steps, 10 minutes" on slide 3 will finish; a reader dropped straight into step 1 with no map bails at step 2.
+
+*SaaS example:* "From CSV to live dashboard in 4 steps" → the pain (weekly manual reporting) → the 4-step overview → one screenshot per step → the finished dashboard + "Built for marketers, not analysts."
+
+**Failure mode:** screenshots with too much UI. Crop to the action, zoom the relevant control, annotate with one arrow — each screenshot should make sense at thumbnail size.
+
+---
+
+## Platform Notes
+
+**Instagram:** 1080×1350 (4:5) slides; up to 20 slides but the frameworks' ranges above reflect where completion rates hold. The caption carries the searchable text — restate the hook and add context, don't just repeat slide 1. First slide doubles as the grid thumbnail.
+
+**LinkedIn (document posts):** Upload as PDF. Square or 4:5. LinkedIn shows a "N pages" badge — Value-Stack's exact-count cover plays especially well here. B2B tolerates denser text per slide than Instagram, but the one-idea-per-slide rule still holds. The post text above the document is a second hook — write it as its own post, not a throwaway "see attached."
+
+**TikTok photo mode:** Same frameworks work; pacing skews faster — trim each framework toward its minimum slide count.
+
+## Production Checklist
+
+- [ ] Slide 1 works as a standalone feed post (test: would it stop the scroll with no carousel behind it?)
+- [ ] One idea per slide — if a slide needs two sentences of setup, split it
+- [ ] Same visual template on every interior slide
+- [ ] Any count promised on the cover is exactly delivered (no filler, no rounding)
+- [ ] Claims and numbers are real and yours — no invented stats or borrowed screenshots
+- [ ] Text is legible at thumbnail size (minimum ~28pt at 1080px wide)
+- [ ] Final slide has one CTA, not three
+- [ ] Caption/post text written as its own hook, not a repeat of slide 1
+
+## Measuring What Worked
+
+Judge carousels on **saves and completion**, not likes — saves signal reference value (the algorithmic win for carousels), and where per-slide analytics exist (Instagram professional insights, LinkedIn document analytics, or third-party tools), drop-off position tells you which slide broke the swipe chain. When a carousel underperforms, the fix is usually slide 1 (didn't stop the scroll) or the framework choice (list content forced into a rant structure), not the middle slides. Track per-framework performance and double down on the two that fit your audience — see [reverse-engineering.md](reverse-engineering.md) for the analysis workflow.

package/org-skills/social-content/references/listening-sources-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+# Listening Sources — Template
+
+Copy this file to `.agents/listening-sources.md` in your project (or `.claude/listening-sources.md`) and fill in the brackets. Claude reads it when running the [listening workflow](listening.md).
+
+Delete sections you don't use. Keep this short and current — stale sources are worse than no sources.
+
+---
+
+## What We're Listening For
+
+**Brand / product:** [Your product name]
+**Category:** [e.g., "AI writing assistant", "Postgres GUI"]
+**Goal:** [e.g., "find people switching from Notion", "engage with B2B SaaS founders 50-200 employees"]
+
+## ICP (for scoring)
+
+Used by the [scoring rubric](listening.md#scoring-rubric) to judge ICP fit.
+
+- **Role:** [e.g., "founder, head of marketing, marketing ops lead"]
+- **Company stage:** [e.g., "seed to Series B SaaS, 10-200 employees"]
+- **Industry:** [e.g., "B2B SaaS, infra, devtools"]
+- **Signals they're a fit:** [e.g., "writes about GTM, runs paid ads, recently raised"]
+
+---
+
+## Target Accounts
+
+Engage with **every** post from these accounts when relevant. Keep this list to 20-50 max.
+
+### LinkedIn (browser-driven — use dev-browser to view feed)
+- [Name] — `linkedin.com/in/handle`
+- [Name] — `linkedin.com/in/handle`
+
+### X / Twitter (browser-driven)
+- [@handle]
+- [@handle]
+
+### Reddit
+- u/[username]
+- u/[username]
+
+### Bluesky
+- [handle.bsky.social]
+
+### Blogs / Newsletters (RSS)
+- [Name] — `https://example.com/feed/`
+- [Name] — `https://example.substack.com/feed`
+
+### YouTube channels (RSS)
+- [Name] — channel ID `UCxxxxxxxx`
+
+---
+
+## Keywords (intent signals)
+
+Search across all platforms. Claude runs these through Reddit, HN, Bluesky on the [daily loop](listening.md#the-daily-triage-loop).
+
+### High-intent (someone shopping or switching)
+- `"alternative to [competitor]"`
+- `"looking for a [category] tool"`
+- `"recommend a [category]"`
+- `"switching from [competitor]"`
+- `"frustrated with [competitor]"`
+
+### Problem signals (someone in pain)
+- `"[category] is so [bad/hard/expensive]"`
+- `"why is [category] [problem]"`
+- `"hate [pain point]"`
+
+### Brand mentions
+- `"[your brand]"`
+- `"[your brand misspelling]"`
+- `"[your domain]"`
+
+### Competitor mentions (monitor for switching language)
+- `"[competitor 1]"`
+- `"[competitor 2]"`
+
+---
+
+## Subreddits
+
+Pulled via Reddit JSON API on the daily loop.
+
+- r/SaaS
+- r/Entrepreneur
+- r/[your niche, e.g., "marketing", "devtools"]
+- r/[adjacent community]
+
+---
+
+## Saved Searches (manual / browser-driven)
+
+URLs Claude opens via dev-browser to scan.
+
+### LinkedIn Sales Navigator
+- [Search name] — `https://linkedin.com/sales/search/people?...`
+
+### LinkedIn (regular)
+- Posts hashtag — `https://linkedin.com/feed/hashtag/yourtopic/`
+
+### X advanced search
+- [Search name] — `https://x.com/search?q=...&f=live`
+
+---
+
+## Do Not Engage
+
+Save yourself the regret.
+
+- Accounts known for bad-faith dunking: [@handle], [@handle]
+- Blocked brands / competitors who'll screenshot: [list]
+- Topics to avoid: [politics, [your founder's hot takes], etc.]
+
+---
+
+## Notes for Claude
+
+- When asked for "today's top 10," output in the format defined in [listening.md](listening.md#the-daily-triage-loop)
+- For LinkedIn and X, use dev-browser with the persistent session (user is logged in)
+- For everything else, use the curl recipes in [listening.md](listening.md#sources--light-tooling-curl-recipes)
+- Default lookback: 24h. User can override.
+- Always ask before posting — output drafts, user approves and posts manually