@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/vue-bootstrap-secondhand-shopping-website.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 811,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure the code you generate is executable and demonstrable. I am a junior student majoring in software technology, and here are the subjects I've studied: 1. Using HTML and CSS to develop commercial websites 2. Introduction to programming 3. LINUX basics 4. Object-oriented programming 5. MYSQL database management 6. JavaScript programming 7. Database systems and applications 8. Dynamic website development (PHP) 9. HTML5+CSS3 development 10. WEB client development 11. Website construction and management. I need you to complete my request based on what I've learned. I want to use Vue and Bootstrap for the frontend to create a simple secondhand goods shopping website. Please combine the above requirements to create a simple graduation project and the corresponding website.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core secondhand goods listing system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the essential product listing features including product cards, search functionality, filtering, and categorization. Check if the product detail view shows complete information (price, condition, seller info, description, images). Score 0 if the core listing system is missing, 5 if only basic listing is implemented without search/filter, and 10 if all features including advanced search filters are fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the user authentication and profile management properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the Vue implementation includes user registration, login/logout functionality, password recovery, and profile management. Check if the authentication uses proper security practices (token-based auth, secure password storage). Deduct 5 points if no authentication is implemented, 3 points if it lacks profile editing capabilities. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the product management system functional for sellers?",
-      "description": "Assess whether sellers can add new items, upload multiple images, edit existing listings, mark items as sold, and delete listings. Check if form validation is implemented for all inputs. Deduct 5 points if image upload is missing, 3 points if form validation is incomplete, and 5 points if editing functionality is absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart and transaction system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes a complete cart system with add/remove functionality, quantity adjustment, persistent storage (local storage or server-side), and checkout process. Verify if the transaction workflow includes order confirmation, contact information exchange, and transaction history. Deduct 5 points if cart persistence is missing, and 3 points if the checkout process is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, form validation failures, image loading issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time chat between buyers and sellers 2. Geolocation-based item searching 3. Price history tracking 4. Social sharing integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple user profile systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to secondhand shopping (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as Vue component structure, Vuex state management, proper use of Bootstrap), code reusability, and proper separation of concerns. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or Vue best practices are not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no build process is implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Consistent use of Bootstrap components with thoughtful customization 2) Proper layout spacing and responsive design across device sizes 3) Professional typography system (readable font sizes, proper line height). Deduct 3 points for each overcrowded page, 5 points for inconsistent styling, and 5 points for poor mobile responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Immediate feedback on user actions 2) Appropriate loading indicators for async operations 3) Smooth transitions between pages. Deduct 5 points for operations without visual feedback, 3 points for janky transitions or animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/vue2-smart-agriculture-personal-page.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 446,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for display. Could you help me write a Vue 2 personal page for a smart agricultural marketplace system? This should be the user profile page that includes favorite items, order history, nickname and avatar, as well as a personal bio.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue 2 profile page component structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the component structure follows Vue 2 best practices with proper separation of concerns. Check if single-file components (.vue files) are used with appropriate template, script, and style sections. Components should be modular and reusable. Score 0 if minimal Vue integration is implemented, 5 if basic Vue structure is present but with improper organization, and 10 if the component architecture is fully compliant with Vue 2 standards including props validation, lifecycle hooks, and proper data/computed property usage.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the user profile data management properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how user profile data (nickname, avatar, bio) is fetched, displayed, and updated. Check for proper Vuex store integration or API service implementation. The code should handle loading states, error conditions, and successful data retrieval. Deduct 5 points if there's no error handling, 3 points if loading states aren't managed properly, and 3 points if data persistence isn't implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the favorite items section fully functional?",
-      "description": "Examine the implementation of the favorite agricultural items section. Verify if it includes listing, pagination, filtering options, and the ability to add/remove items from favorites. Check if item cards display appropriate information (image, name, price, availability). Deduct 3 points if pagination is missing, 3 points if there's no add/remove functionality, and 4 points if the display lacks essential agricultural product information. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the order history implementation complete and agriculture-specific?",
-      "description": "Assess the order history implementation for agricultural products. Check if it includes order status tracking, delivery estimation (particularly important for fresh produce), sorting/filtering options, and order details with agricultural-specific information (harvest dates, origin farm, etc.). Deduct 3 points if order status tracking is missing, 3 points if agricultural-specific information is absent, and 4 points if sorting/filtering is not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, API failures, invalid user input, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the agricultural marketplace experience (e.g., 1. Seasonal product highlighting 2. Farm-to-table tracking visualization 3. Harvest calendar integration 4. Weather-based recommendations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to edit profile) 2. Function modules unrelated to an agricultural marketplace (e.g., social media features not tied to farm products) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on produce listings). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API services, Vue components, and state management), unit test coverage, and build process optimization. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or Vue best practices are not followed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not optimized for production. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards for an agricultural marketplace?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles while being appropriate for an agricultural context: 1) Nature-inspired color palette (earthy tones, greens) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Agricultural imagery and iconography. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inconsistent color schemes, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance, especially for agricultural product selection. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/vue2-spring-boot-web-app-homepage-orders-personal-center.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1250,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable. Create a web version of an app using Vue2 framework with a homepage, orders, and personal center at the bottom of the page. Use Vue + Element UI for frontend and Spring Boot for backend technology.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue2 application structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code follows Vue2 best practices with proper component organization, Vue Router configuration, and project structure. The app should have a clear separation of views for homepage, orders, and personal center. Evaluate the use of Vuex or other state management patterns. Score 0 if basic Vue2 structure is missing, 5 if basic structure exists but with organizational issues, 10 if professionally structured with proper component hierarchy and lifecycle management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the bottom navigation bar correctly implemented with Element UI?",
-      "description": "Verify if the bottom navigation bar is properly implemented using Element UI components, with correct routing between homepage, orders, and personal center. The navigation should include appropriate icons, active state indicators, and smooth transitions. Check if the component is responsive and fixed to the bottom across all pages. Deduct 5 points if the navigation is not fixed to the bottom, 3 points if transitions are missing or jarring, and 3 points if the active state is not visually clear.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the three main views (homepage, orders, personal center) adequately implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the completeness of each required view. Homepage should display relevant content (products, promotions, etc.), Orders page should show order listings with status and details, and Personal Center should include user info and settings. Each view should have proper layout and functionalities relevant to its purpose. Score 0 if any view is missing, 5 if views exist but with minimal functionality, and 10 if all views are comprehensive with appropriate features.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the Spring Boot backend architecture properly designed?",
-      "description": "Examine the Spring Boot backend code for proper MVC architecture, RESTful API endpoints (especially for user, orders, and product data), data models, and service layers. Check for proper dependency injection, exception handling, and request validation. Deduct 5 points if REST conventions are not followed, 5 points if proper separation of concerns is missing, and 3 points if data validation is inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, invalid input data, authentication failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include proper try-catch blocks, form validations, loading states, and error boundaries. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for average implementation, and 0 points if no exception handling exists.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Pull-to-refresh with skeleton loading 2. Offline data persistence 3. Transitions between pages 4. Virtual scrolling for long lists). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple routing systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to the core app requirements (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., heavy background processes). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API/components/views), component reusability, naming conventions, and build process configuration. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if proper linting rules or code formatting are not established. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Consistent Element UI theme usage 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inconsistent Element UI usage, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear loading states during data fetching. Deduct 5 points for operations without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between views, and 5 points for missing loading indicators during API calls. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/vue2-springboot-mysql-e-commerce-system.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1376,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure that any code you generate is executable for demonstration. Can you help me create a web project - a standard e-commerce system with Vue 2 for the frontend, Spring Boot and MyBatis for the backend, and MySQL for the database?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue 2 frontend architecture properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the Vue 2 implementation, including proper component hierarchy, Vuex state management, Vue Router configuration, and lifecycle hooks usage. Check for single-file component structure, proper props validation, and event handling. Score 0 if Vue is not implemented, 5 if basic Vue implementation exists but with architectural issues, and 10 if implemented following Vue best practices with proper separation of concerns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the Spring Boot backend architecture correctly structured?",
-      "description": "Assess the Spring Boot architecture including proper layering (Controller, Service, Repository), dependency injection, transaction management, and REST API design. Check for proper exception handling, input validation, and response formatting. Deduct 5 points if missing proper layering, 3 points if missing global exception handling, and 2 points if REST API endpoints don't follow standard naming conventions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is MyBatis integration properly configured and optimized?",
-      "description": "Examine MyBatis configuration, SQL mapping files, dynamic queries, and database transaction handling. Check for proper use of parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection, pagination implementation, and optimization techniques like result caching. Deduct 3 points for missing pagination, 4 points for inefficient queries (N+1 problems), and 3 points for lack of proper mapping between entities and DTOs. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the MySQL database schema design normalized and optimized?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the database schema for proper normalization (3NF), appropriate indexing, constraints (primary keys, foreign keys), and data types. Check for proper handling of e-commerce specific entities (products, orders, users, carts). Deduct 3 points for denormalization without justification, 4 points for missing indexes on frequently queried fields, and 3 points for inappropriate data type choices. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid input data, network failures, database connection issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check for input validation on both frontend and backend, proper error handling, and logging. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the e-commerce experience (e.g., 1. Real-time inventory tracking 2. AI-powered product recommendations 3. Advanced search with filters 4. One-click checkout). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart management systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to e-commerce (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core e-commerce functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design, separation of concerns, code reusability, documentation, and testing (unit tests, integration tests). Check for proper use of design patterns, code style consistency, and build automation tools. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are misused; deduct 3 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 2 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the e-commerce UI follows modern design principles: 1) Consistent color scheme that aligns with brand identity 2) Proper spacing and alignment of product displays and information 3) Professional typography hierarchy (product titles, descriptions, prices). Deduct 3 points for cluttered product pages, 4 points for inconsistent design elements across pages, and 3 points for poor mobile responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the e-commerce interactions conform to user expectations: 1) Quick product loading and filtering (≤ 300ms) 2) Smooth cart updates and checkout process 3) Clear feedback for user actions (add to cart, purchase completion). Deduct 4 points for slow page transitions, 3 points for cart updates without visual confirmation, and 3 points for confusing checkout flow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/web-based-express-delivery-tracker.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 775,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Can you create a web-based program for tracking express deliveries?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the express delivery tracking core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements tracking number input/validation, delivery status display, and real-time progress updates through HTML/JavaScript. Should include package status parsing (shipped, in-transit, out-for-delivery, delivered), timeline visualization, and estimated delivery time calculation. Score 0 if core tracking logic is not implemented, 5 if only basic status display is available, and 10 if comprehensive tracking with detailed progress indicators is fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the multi-carrier API integration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system integrates with multiple shipping carriers (FedEx, UPS, DHL, USPS, etc.) through their respective APIs, includes proper API key management, rate limiting, and error handling for failed requests. Should support automatic carrier detection from tracking numbers. Deduct 5 points if only one carrier is supported, 3 points if API error handling is missing, and 2 points if rate limiting is not implemented. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is real-time notification and tracking history management designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the system provides real-time notifications (email/SMS/push) for status changes, implements tracking history storage with timestamps, and offers package comparison features. Should include notification preferences and delivery alerts. Deduct 5 points if no notification system exists, 3 points if tracking history is not persistent, and 2 points if notification preferences are not customizable. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is comprehensive package management and user experience constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes complete package lifecycle management, including saved tracking lists, delivery address management, package categorization, and export functionality. Should support bulk tracking operations and delivery scheduling. Deduct 5 points if package persistence is not implemented, 3 points if bulk operations are missing, and 2 points if no export/sharing functionality exists. Give 10 points if fully implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (invalid tracking numbers, API timeouts, network interruption, malformed carrier responses, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle API failures, provide offline caching, and show meaningful error messages, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the tracking experience (e.g., 1. Interactive delivery map with real-time location 2. Delivery time prediction using ML 3. Package photo confirmation 4. Delivery attempt scheduling 5. Carbon footprint tracking). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar tracking functions (e.g., multiple API call mechanisms coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to delivery tracking (e.g., built-in shopping features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on tracking updates). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core tracking functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating API handlers/UI components/data models), proper error handling, configuration management, and code organization. Deduct 5 points if API keys are hardcoded or global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no proper separation of concerns exists. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the tracking interface follows modern design principles: 1) Clear visual hierarchy for tracking information 2) Consistent color coding for delivery statuses 3) Proper spacing and typography (body font ≥ 14px, line height > 1.5x) 4) Mobile-responsive design. Deduct 3 points for each cluttered tracking display, 5 points for poor status color differentiation, and 5 points for non-responsive layout. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether tracking interactions conform to user expectations: 1) Tracking number input with instant validation feedback 2) Smooth loading states during API calls (≤ 2s perceived wait) 3) Clear visual feedback for tracking updates 4) Intuitive navigation between multiple packages. Deduct 5 points for each operation without loading feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions during status updates, and 5 points for confusing tracking information layout. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/web-novel-reading-project-vue-pages.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1370,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. Help me write a web-based novel reading project using Vue and its ecosystem, including home page, bookstore, summer vacation, and my profile pages.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Vue.js project structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code properly structures a Vue application with appropriate component hierarchy, Vue Router configuration, and state management (Vuex/Pinia). Score 0 if core Vue setup is missing, 5 if basic structure exists but lacks organization, and 10 if follows Vue best practices with proper separation of concerns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the home page functionality complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the home page includes necessary features: featured novels carousel, reading recommendations, categorized novel listings, and search functionality. Deduct 3 points if responsive design is missing, 3 points for missing search, and 2 points for poor content organization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the bookstore implementation comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the bookstore page includes novel filtering by genre/popularity/rating, pagination, novel detail cards with cover images, and sorting options. Deduct 3 points if filtering is missing, 2 points if pagination isn't implemented, and 3 points if novel previews lack essential metadata. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the summer vacation and profile pages properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the summer vacation page features seasonal reading lists, special offers, and themed collections; and whether the profile page includes user settings, reading history, bookmarks, and personalization options. Deduct 3 points for each major missing component per page, with particular attention to reading progress tracking. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as API failures, missing data, slow network connections, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Night reading mode with customizable typography 2. Audio narration integration 3. Social reading features like annotations or comments). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple state management approaches mixed) 2. Function modules unrelated to novel reading (e.g., unnecessary gaming elements) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating API/components/views), component reusability, code maintainability, and build process configuration. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or Vue composition API/options API are inconsistently mixed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process lacks optimization for production. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching suitable for extended reading (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography system (body font size ≥ 16px, line height over 1.5 times for reading comfort). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Page transitions feel natural with content persistence where appropriate 2) Loading states for asynchronous operations 3) Clear navigation and reading position indicators. Deduct 5 points for jarring page transitions, 3 points for missing loading indicators during data fetching, and 5 points for difficult navigation between book sections. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-delivery-platform-sf-express-integration.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1533,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable when demonstrated. Write code suitable for the WeChat Developer Tool and store it in separate plain documents for easy maintenance. The code needs to implement a delivery platform that integrates with SF Express City Services. The provided code must be functional and runnable. Also, inform me about what type of legal domain name is required, as I already have a registered legal domain name. Store the code in demo and home files, which will serve as two separate tabs.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program structure and SF Express API integration fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements WeChat Mini Program framework structure with proper app.js, app.json configuration, and successfully integrates SF Express City Services API including order creation, tracking, and status management. Score 0 if core API integration is missing, 5 if only basic order creation is implemented, and 10 if complete delivery lifecycle management is included with proper error handling and response parsing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the demo and home tab functionalities properly separated and implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code provides clear separation between demo and home modules as separate tabs, with demo showcasing platform features and home providing actual delivery services. Evaluate navigation consistency, data sharing between tabs, and independent functionality. Deduct 5 points if tab switching is not smooth, and 3 points if data persistence between tabs is not handled properly. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the delivery platform core business logic comprehensively designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the platform includes essential delivery features: address management, delivery scheduling, real-time tracking, price calculation, and order history. Check if the code handles different delivery types (same-city, express), time slot selection, and recipient management. Deduct 5 points if order status synchronization is missing, and 5 points if address validation is not implemented. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is WeChat Mini Program compliance and domain configuration properly handled?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes proper WeChat Mini Program authorization flows, payment integration preparation, and domain whitelist configuration guidance. Evaluate if HTTPS requirements are addressed and if the code provides clear instructions for domain setup. Deduct 5 points if WeChat compliance requirements are not met, and 3 points if domain configuration guidance is incomplete. Give 10 points if fully compliant with WeChat ecosystem requirements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network timeouts, API failures, invalid addresses, payment errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle WeChat Mini Program lifecycle events and API rate limiting, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that enhance delivery experience?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes value-added features that improve user experience (e.g., 1. Real-time delivery tracking with map visualization 2. Smart address suggestions based on location 3. Delivery time prediction with traffic analysis 4. Multi-language support for international users). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple address validation logics) 2. Function modules unrelated to delivery services (e.g., built-in games or social features) 3. Excessive animations that affect performance on mobile devices. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core delivery functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have proper WeChat Mini Program engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design following WeChat Mini Program best practices (proper component separation, utils organization, API encapsulation), code reusability, and build optimization. Deduct 5 points if global data pollution is found or WeChat-specific patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if WeChat Mini Program performance optimization is not implemented. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet WeChat Mini Program and delivery platform standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the UI follows WeChat Design Guidelines and delivery platform conventions: 1) Consistent with WeChat native components styling 2) Clear delivery status indicators and progress tracking 3) Mobile-optimized layout with proper touch targets (≥44px) 4) Appropriate use of WeChat color scheme. Deduct 3 points for each non-compliant UI element, 5 points for poor mobile adaptation, and 5 points for inconsistent design patterns. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the mobile interaction smooth and delivery-focused?",
-      "description": "Judge whether interactions are optimized for mobile delivery scenarios: 1) Quick address input with location services 2) One-tap order placement with minimal steps 3) Smooth scrolling in order lists and tracking pages 4) Appropriate loading states for API calls 5) Clear feedback for delivery status changes. Deduct 5 points for each clunky interaction, 3 points for slow API response handling, and 5 points for unclear delivery status communication. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mall-app-rewards-delivery-frontend-backend.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1519,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable whenever possible. Write a WeChat mall application that includes sign-in rewards, lottery rewards, product categorization, in-store redemption, express delivery options, and directly applicable frontend and backend code. Also provide clear installation and practical usage instructions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat mall core e-commerce system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements product management (CRUD operations), shopping cart functionality, order processing workflow, and payment integration through frontend/backend architecture. Check if product categorization with filtering/search is properly implemented, and whether inventory management is included. Score 0 if core shopping features are missing, 5 if only basic product display is implemented, and 10 if complete e-commerce workflow including payment processing is fully functional.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the gamification features (sign-in rewards and lottery system) properly integrated?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether sign-in reward system includes consecutive day tracking, reward escalation logic, and anti-cheating mechanisms. Check if lottery system implements fair probability distribution, prize inventory management, and user participation limits. Deduct 5 points if reward algorithms are exploitable, 3 points if user progress tracking is inaccurate. Verify integration with user points/credits system and reward redemption flow. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the dual fulfillment system (in-store redemption + express delivery) architected correctly?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system properly handles two distinct fulfillment workflows: in-store pickup with QR code generation/scanning and express delivery with shipping integration. Evaluate if inventory is properly allocated between channels, location-based store selection is implemented, and delivery tracking is functional. Deduct 5 points if inventory conflicts between channels exist, 3 points if store location services are missing. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is WeChat ecosystem integration and user authentication properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether WeChat OAuth integration is correctly implemented for user login, WeChat Pay integration is functional, and WeChat sharing capabilities are included. Check if WeChat Mini Program APIs are properly utilized and user session management follows WeChat guidelines. Deduct 5 points if WeChat Pay integration is missing or non-functional, 3 points if user authentication flow has security vulnerabilities. Verify social sharing and Mini Program compliance. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as payment failures, network interruptions, inventory conflicts, invalid user inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases like concurrent user actions, session timeouts, and API failures, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the mall experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered product recommendations 2. Social sharing with referral rewards 3. Live streaming integration 4. AR product preview 5. Voice search functionality). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple payment processing logics coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to mall operations (e.g., built-in games unrelated to rewards) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations during checkout). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core mall functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating business logic/API/database layers), database schema design, API documentation, and deployment configuration. Deduct 5 points if database relationships are poorly designed or lack proper indexing; deduct 5 points if APIs lack proper validation or documentation; deduct 5 points if no environment configuration management exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional e-commerce design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the mall design follows modern e-commerce UI principles: 1) Product imagery with consistent aspect ratios and quality 2) Clear pricing display with proper currency formatting 3) Intuitive navigation with breadcrumbs 4) Mobile-responsive design optimized for WeChat browser. Deduct 3 points for each poorly designed product card, 5 points for confusing checkout flow, and 5 points for non-mobile-optimized layouts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the shopping interaction smooth and conversion-optimized?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the shopping experience follows e-commerce best practices: 1) Add-to-cart feedback ≤ 200ms 2) Smooth checkout flow with progress indicators 3) Clear call-to-action buttons with proper sizing for mobile 4) Loading states for all async operations. Deduct 5 points for each step in checkout without clear progress indication, 3 points for slow cart updates, and 5 points for hard-to-tap buttons on mobile. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}