@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/building-monument-statue.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 129,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Take care to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Building monument statue.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the monument statue accurately implemented in SVG?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG code creates a recognizable monument statue with proper proportions and structure. Check for essential architectural elements (base, column, statue/figure on top). Score 0 if the monument is unrecognizable, 5 if basic elements are present but with significant inaccuracies, and 10 if the monument is detailed and visually accurate.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code properly structured with semantic element naming?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the structure of the SVG code: proper use of groups (<g>), logical organization of elements, semantic ID/class naming, and appropriate layering for visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points if elements are not grouped logically, 3 points if naming conventions are inconsistent or meaningless, and 4 points if the code structure makes maintenance difficult. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the monument statue visually detailed with appropriate texturing and shadowing?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG includes visual details like texture (using patterns or gradient fills), shadows (using filters or opacity), and dimensional effects that enhance realism. Score 0 if no texturing/shadowing exists, 5 if basic techniques are applied, and 10 if advanced SVG filters and effects are used to create realistic monument rendering.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are viewBox and responsive design principles implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the SVG uses proper viewBox attributes, preserveAspectRatio settings, and relative units to ensure the monument displays correctly across different screen sizes. Deduct 5 points if fixed dimensions are used instead of responsive techniques, 3 points if the viewBox is improperly configured, and 2 points if the monument distorts on resize. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, rendering in different contexts, and fallbacks for unsupported features). Code with strong robustness should include browser-specific prefixes where needed, fallbacks for filters/effects, and clean rendering across browsers, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no compatibility considerations exist, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive elements that respond to hover/click 2. Subtle animations that bring the monument to life 3. Day/night lighting effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary duplicate elements or path definitions 2. Over-detailed components that don't contribute to visual clarity 3. Excessive filters or effects that slow down rendering without significant visual improvement. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual presentation is impaired by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code efficiency (optimized paths, use of symbols for repeated elements), readability (proper indentation, comments for complex sections), and maintainability (modular structure). Deduct 5 points if paths aren't optimized or have excessive nodes; deduct 3 points for lack of comments on complex sections; deduct 2 points if the code isn't modularized properly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the monument design follows professional aesthetic principles: 1) Harmonious color palette appropriate for stone/metal materials 2) Proper proportions following classical architectural principles 3) Attention to detail in ornamental elements. Deduct 3 points for inappropriate color choices, 4 points for disproportionate structural elements, and 3 points for lack of refined details. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any included dynamic effects enhance the user experience: 1) Smooth transitions if animations are present 2) Purposeful interactivity that adds value 3) Performance optimization for complex visual elements. Deduct 4 points for jerky animations, 3 points for gratuitous effects that don't enhance understanding, and 3 points for interactions that lack visual feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/burkina-faso-flag-with-star.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 131,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the generated code can be executed for display whenever possible.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: Create an image of the Burkina Faso flag, featuring a star.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the flag's aspect ratio correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG dimensions maintain the official 2:3 ratio (height:width) of the Burkina Faso flag. The viewBox should be properly set to preserve this ratio. Score 0 if completely incorrect, 5 if approximate but not precise, 10 if exactly matching the official 2:3 ratio.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the flag colors accurately represented?",
-      "description": "Verify that the flag uses the exact official colors: red (#EF2B2D) for the top half, green (#009E49) for the bottom half, and yellow (#FCD116) for the star. Deduct 3 points for each incorrect color or if approximate colors are used without the correct hex codes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the star correctly positioned and proportioned?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the yellow star is properly centered in the flag and correctly sized (approximately 1/3 of the flag's height). The star must have the proper shape with 5 points of equal length and correct angles. Deduct 5 points if the star is misplaced, 5 points if incorrectly sized, and 5 points if the star shape is malformed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG implementation efficient and well-structured?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG uses the most appropriate elements (rect for the rectangles, polygon or path for the star). Check for optimal implementation without unnecessary complexity or redundant elements. Deduct 5 points if inappropriate elements are used, 3 points if there are redundant shape definitions, and 5 points if the code is excessively verbose. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes proper SVG structure with namespaces, appropriate viewBox settings, and will render correctly across different browsers and screen sizes. Check if there are fallbacks or alternative rendering methods if needed. Code with strong robustness should handle various display environments effectively, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if there are obvious rendering issues, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visual experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation when hovering over the flag 2. Interactive elements that provide information about Burkina Faso 3. Responsive design adaptations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant graphical elements or shapes that could be simplified 2. Unnecessary attributes or styling that don't contribute to the flag's appearance 3. Excessive animation or effects that distract from the flag's representation. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core representation is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review the code organization (such as proper indentation, meaningful variable names), efficiency (minimal use of path operations), and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if there's inconsistent formatting; deduct 5 points if there's excessive nesting or complexity; deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation for complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the implementation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows flag design principles: 1) Clean edges and precise positioning 2) Proper contrast between elements 3) Faithful reproduction of the official flag. Deduct 3 points for each visible rendering artifact, 5 points for poor color contrast, and 5 points for significant deviation from the official design. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the code accessible and compatible?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the implementation includes accessibility features such as: 1) Appropriate title and description tags 2) ARIA attributes where applicable 3) Compatible with assistive technologies. Also check if the SVG works across different browsers and devices. Deduct 5 points for missing accessibility features, 3 points for compatibility issues, and 5 points if the SVG doesn't scale appropriately. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/camera-photo-shutter-svg-code.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 90,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code. Create a camera taking a photo with a shutter using SVG code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG camera structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the camera body structure through SVG elements, including essential components like camera body, lens, viewfinder, and flash. The structure should be proportionally correct and visually recognizable as a camera. Score 0 if basic camera shape is missing, 5 if only basic rectangular body is implemented, and 10 if all major camera components are detailed and proportionally accurate.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the shutter mechanism fully functional?",
-      "description": "Check whether the shutter animation is implemented with realistic behavior, including shutter blade movement, opening/closing sequence, and proper timing. The shutter should have visual feedback that mimics real camera operation. Deduct 5 points if shutter animation is too simplistic, and 3 points if timing feels unnatural. Full score requires smooth, realistic shutter blade animation with proper easing functions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the photo-taking interaction complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the photo-taking process includes complete user interaction flow: shutter button press, camera shake effect, flash animation, and capture confirmation. The interaction should feel responsive and provide clear visual feedback. Deduct 5 points if missing flash effect, 3 points if no camera shake simulation, and 2 points if shutter button lacks proper hover/active states. Full implementation scores 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the visual effects and animations polished?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes polished visual effects such as lens reflection, proper lighting gradients, shadow effects, and smooth transitions. The camera should have realistic material textures and professional visual appeal. Deduct 5 points if effects look flat or amateur, 3 points if gradients and shadows are poorly implemented, and 2 points if lens lacks realistic reflection effects. Full score requires professional-grade visual polish.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as rapid clicking, browser compatibility issues, animation interruptions, etc.) and provide stable performance across different scenarios. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases and maintain smooth operation. Give 10 points for excellent error handling, 5 points for average robustness, and 0 points if no exception handling is present.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Multiple camera angles or perspectives 2. Realistic sound effect integration 3. Photo preview/gallery feature 4. Different camera models/styles 5. Zoom functionality). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple animation triggers for same effect) 2. Function modules unrelated to camera operation (e.g., built-in games or irrelevant widgets) 3. Overly complex effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive particle systems or heavy filters). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core camera functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization, SVG structure cleanliness, CSS/JavaScript separation, and reusability. Check for proper use of SVG groups, clean DOM structure, and maintainable code patterns. Deduct 5 points if SVG structure is chaotic or lacks proper grouping; deduct 5 points if inline styles are overused instead of CSS classes; deduct 5 points if code lacks modularity and reusability. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching with realistic camera colors (blacks, silvers, grays) 2) Proper proportions and realistic scaling 3) Professional visual hierarchy and clean composition. Deduct 3 points for each unrealistic color choice, 5 points for poor proportional relationships, and 5 points for cluttered or unprofessional visual presentation. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Button press feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Shutter animation duration feels natural (typically 200-400ms) 3) Clear visual focus and interaction states 4) Smooth transitions without jarring movements. Deduct 5 points for each sluggish interaction, 3 points for unnatural animation timing, and 5 points for unclear interaction feedback. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/carboy-airlock-carbonation-homebrewing.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 43,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the code you generate is executable. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The carboy has an airlock for carbonation during homebrewing.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the carboy shape accurately represented in SVG?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code properly implements the characteristic flask-like shape of a carboy with appropriate proportions (wider bottom, narrowed neck). Check if the path/polygon elements use correct coordinates to create a visually accurate representation. Score 0 if the carboy shape is incorrect, 5 if basic shape is present but proportions are off, and 10 for accurate representation with proper curvature and dimensions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the airlock mechanism correctly depicted with functional accuracy?",
-      "description": "Review whether the airlock is implemented with proper structural details showing the S-shaped or three-piece design that allows gas to escape but prevents air from entering. Verify if the implementation shows the water/liquid barrier inside the airlock. Deduct 5 points if the airlock is visually present but lacks functional detail, and deduct another 3 points if the connection to the carboy is incorrect or missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the SVG implement appropriate transparency and liquid level visualization?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code uses transparency effects to show the glass nature of the carboy and visibility of liquid contents. Evaluate if the liquid level is clearly depicted with proper opacity/fill attributes. Deduct 3 points if transparency is missing, 5 points if the liquid level is not visible or poorly implemented, and 3 points if the refractive properties of glass are not suggested visually. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code structured to demonstrate the carbonation process visually?",
-      "description": "Analyze whether the code includes visual elements representing the carbonation process, such as bubbles rising through the liquid and/or gas movement through the airlock. Check if animations are implemented to show the dynamic nature of fermentation. Score 0 if no carbonation visualization exists, 5 if static bubbles are present, and 10 if animations showing the active fermentation process are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code handles viewBox properly to ensure consistent display across different screen sizes. Check if there are fallback options for browsers with limited SVG support and whether clip-paths or masks are implemented correctly. Code with strong robustness should work consistently across browsers, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average with some browser compatibility issues, give 5 points, and if it fails in multiple environments, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Interactive elements that respond to user hovering/clicking 2. Color changes indicating fermentation stages 3. Realistic liquid physics simulation). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements that contribute nothing visually 2. Excessive detail that increases file size without improving visual quality 3. Complex animations or effects that obscure the main subject rather than enhance it. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if these redundancies significantly impact loading performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG structure including proper grouping (<g> elements), meaningful IDs/classes, and code reusability. Check if the code uses variables for repeating values and implements efficient path commands rather than excessive points. Deduct 5 points if elements are not logically grouped; deduct 5 points if there's excessive repetition instead of reusing elements; deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments explaining complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the visual design follows modern SVG best practices: 1) Harmonious color scheme appropriate for glass and liquid representation 2) Proper balance of detail vs. minimalism 3) Professional use of gradients and lighting effects to suggest dimensional glass properties. Deduct 3 points for unrealistic coloring, 5 points for flat/unconvincing glass representation, and 5 points for poor lighting or shadow implementation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any included animations conform to natural physics: 1) Bubbles rise at realistic speeds 2) Liquid movement appears natural with appropriate easing 3) Any transitions are smooth with appropriate timing functions. Deduct 5 points for jerky animations, 3 points for unrealistic motion physics, and 5 points for animations that run too quickly or slowly to be convincing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/cartoon-hedge-with-face.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 120,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable for display.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code, creating it with SVG code. The requirement is to create: a cartoon hedge with a face on it.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG code has proper namespace declarations, appropriate viewBox dimensions, and is structured with proper elements (path, rect, circle, etc.). Verify that the SVG can be rendered in a browser without errors. Deduct 3 points for missing namespaces, 3 points for improper viewBox, and 4 points if the SVG doesn't render correctly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the hedge shape well-defined?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the hedge shape is clearly recognizable and has appropriate bush-like textures (using paths with undulating curves or multiple small shapes). Check if the shape uses techniques like gradients or multiple layers to provide depth. Score 10 points for a realistic and visually appealing hedge, 5 points for a basic representation, and 0 points if the shape is not recognizable as a hedge.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the cartoon face properly designed?",
-      "description": "Review if the face includes all essential features (eyes, nose, mouth) with cartoon-like expressions. Check if the face is properly positioned on the hedge and is proportionate to the hedge size. Score 10 points for an expressive, well-integrated face with detailed features; 5 points if the face is basic but recognizable; 0 points if the face is missing or unrecognizable.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the implementation responsive and scalable?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG uses relative units or percentage-based positioning to ensure it scales well on different screen sizes. Verify that the viewBox is properly set to maintain aspect ratio. Award 10 points for fully responsive design that scales without distortion, 5 points if it scales but with minor issues, and 0 points if the design breaks when resized.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as rendering in different browsers, scaling to extreme sizes, etc.) and follows SVG best practices. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no considerations for robustness are evident, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation effects like swaying or blinking 2. Interactive elements that respond to user actions 3. Creative use of filters or masks for special effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate path definitions or redundant shape elements 2. Unnecessary attributes that don't contribute to the visual outcome 3. Overly complex implementations that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual elements are obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG code is well-organized with proper grouping (<g> elements), meaningful IDs/classes, and clean path commands. Check for code reusability through defined patterns or symbols if appropriate. Deduct 3 points for disorganized code structure, 3 points for hardcoded values that could be variables, and 4 points for inefficient path commands or excessive code. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme appropriate for a cartoon hedge 2) Balanced composition with appropriate emphasis on the face 3) Proper use of stroke weights and fill colors. Deduct 3 points for jarring color combinations, 4 points for poor visual balance, and 3 points for inconsistent design elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the visual style consistent with cartoon aesthetics?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the hedge and face conform to cartoon style expectations: 1) Simplified yet recognizable forms 2) Exaggerated or stylized features that evoke emotion 3) Appropriate level of detail that maintains clarity. Deduct 3 points for overly realistic elements that clash with cartoon style, 3 points for inconsistent stylization across elements, and 4 points if the overall impression doesn't read as 'cartoon'. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/chinese-character-long-tail-svg-image.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 106,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate can be executed and displayed. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a close up of a Chinese character with a long tail.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Chinese character with long tail accurately rendered in SVG?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code correctly renders a recognizable Chinese character with an elongated, flowing tail. The character should be clearly identifiable while maintaining aesthetic calligraphic properties. Award 10 points for a perfectly rendered character with appropriate stroke weight variation and authentic calligraphy style; 5 points if the character is recognizable but lacks some traditional calligraphic details; 0 points if the character is unrecognizable or missing the long tail feature.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the SVG path implementation technically sound?",
-      "description": "Check if the implementation uses appropriate SVG path commands (M, L, C, Q, etc.) to create smooth curves and proper stroke connections. Examine whether the path data is optimized (not unnecessarily complex) while still capturing the essential calligraphic details. Award 10 points for expertly crafted paths with perfect curve control; deduct 3 points if paths show corner artifacts; deduct 5 points if paths are overly complex or inefficient.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include proper Chinese calligraphy styling?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the SVG incorporates traditional Chinese calligraphy characteristics such as proper stroke order, pressure variations, and brush-like qualities. Review if stroke endings have appropriate tapering and if the long tail exhibits natural flowing qualities. Award full points for authentic calligraphy styling; deduct 5 points if the implementation lacks brush texture or pressure variation; deduct all points if the styling is completely inconsistent with Chinese calligraphy traditions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the close-up effect properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the SVG successfully creates a close-up impression through appropriate scaling, framing, or detail emphasis of the character. Check whether viewBox, preserveAspectRatio and other SVG attributes are properly configured to maintain the close-up perspective. Deduct 5 points if the character appears distant rather than close-up; deduct 3 points if scaling issues distort the character; award 10 points for a perfectly executed close-up effect with proper detail emphasis.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code follows best practices for compatibility across browsers and devices. Check for proper namespace declarations, valid attribute usage, and fallback options when applicable. Code with strong robustness should work consistently across major browsers and screen sizes, giving 10 points. If robustness is average with minor rendering inconsistencies, give 5 points, and if significant cross-browser issues exist, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation of the brushstroke forming 2. Interactive elements that respond to mouse movements 3. Gradient or texture effects that simulate ink on paper). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary SVG elements or groups that don't contribute to the visual 2. Overly complex path data that could be simplified 3. Decorative elements that distract from the main character. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core character visualization is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (such as separating structure/styling/animation), code comments explaining artistic decisions, and optimization for file size. Deduct 5 points if styles are hardcoded instead of using CSS where appropriate; deduct 5 points if the SVG contains unnecessary precision in decimal points; deduct 5 points if there are no comments explaining complex path constructions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows artistic principles: 1) Appropriate negative space around the character 2) Balanced visual weight between character body and tail 3) Professional color choices that enhance readability (contrast between character and background). Deduct 3 points for cramped composition, 5 points for poor visual balance, and 5 points for colors that reduce character visibility. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any included animations or interactions follow natural calligraphy movements: 1) Brush stroke animations that follow traditional stroke order 2) Transitions that mimic brush on paper physics 3) Appropriate timing that reflects the weight and momentum of brush calligraphy. Deduct 5 points for unnatural movement patterns, 3 points for jarring transitions, and 5 points for animations that run counter to traditional calligraphy techniques. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/cleaning-mess-wet-mop-wiping-liquid.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 5,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration whenever possible. Please help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: create a representation of cleaning up a mess with a wet mop, then wiping away all remaining liquid.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG code includes proper namespace, viewBox dimensions, and appropriate container elements. All SVG elements should be properly nested and have appropriate identifiers. Score 0 if SVG structure is missing or fundamentally flawed, 5 if basic structure exists but has issues, 10 if structure is complete and well-organized.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the mess representation visually clear and realistic?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the 'mess' is depicted in the SVG. Look for appropriate visual elements like splatter patterns, puddles, or stains with realistic coloring and opacity. Score 0 if no mess is visualized, 5 if a basic/abstract mess is shown, 10 if the mess has realistic texture, varied patterns, and appropriate coloring.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the mop animation sequence implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of the mop animation sequence. Check for proper position tracking, rotation mechanics, and realistic movement patterns when cleaning the mess. Score 0 if the mop animation is absent, 5 if basic movement exists but appears mechanical, 10 if the mop moves naturally with convincing physics and cleaning patterns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the liquid removal transition effect visually convincing?",
-      "description": "Assess the transition effect of removing liquid from the surface. Check if there's a progressive cleanup effect showing gradual removal rather than an abrupt disappearance. Verify proper use of opacity changes, path morphing, or mask techniques. Score 0 if liquid simply disappears, 5 if basic transitions exist, 10 if transitions show realistic liquid behavior with wetness gradually receding.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different screen sizes and browser implementations. Check for proper use of viewBox scaling, responsive design principles, and cross-browser compatibility techniques. Code with strong robustness should work across major browsers and adapt to different viewport sizes, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no adaptation is considered, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Water droplet physics 2. Dynamic reflection/light effects 3. Sound synchronization with visual feedback). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or nested groups that serve identical purposes 2. Unnecessary animations or effects unrelated to the cleaning visualization 3. Excessive filters or gradients that significantly impact performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core animation is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review the SVG structure organization (such as proper grouping of related elements), use of reusable components, and optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global IDs/classes are overused without proper namespacing; deduct 5 points if similar patterns are repeated without proper symbol definitions; deduct 5 points if the SVG lacks proper optimization (excessive precision in path data, unnecessary attributes). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching with contextually appropriate palette 2) Proper proportions and scale relationships between elements 3) Consistent stylistic choices throughout the animation. Deduct 3 points for each visual inconsistency, 5 points for jarring color combinations, and 5 points for unbalanced composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the animation timing and easing functions create natural motion: 1) Appropriate animation duration for each phase of cleaning 2) Natural easing functions that mimic physical movement 3) Smooth transitions between animation states. Deduct 5 points for jerky or stuttering animations, 3 points for unrealistic timing (too fast/slow), and 5 points for abrupt transitions between states. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/close-up-basketball-new-york-knicks-logo.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 35,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you provide is executable whenever possible.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code. Create a close-up of a basketball featuring the New York Knicks logo using SVG code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basketball shape accurately implemented in SVG?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly implements a realistic basketball sphere using SVG elements. The basketball should have the correct proportions (close to a circle), appropriate fill color (orange/brown), and proper depth perception. Deduct 5 points if the basketball shape lacks dimensional quality, 3 points if the proportions are incorrect, and 2 points if the coloring is unrealistic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the basketball texture lines/seams accurately rendered?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG code includes the characteristic curved lines/seams of a basketball. A standard basketball has 8 seams forming curved panels. Verify that these lines are properly positioned, have appropriate curvature, and realistic width/color. Give 10 points for anatomically correct seam patterns with proper spacing and curvature, 5 points if basic lines are present but improperly positioned, and 0 points if seams are missing entirely.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the New York Knicks logo properly implemented and positioned?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the New York Knicks logo is accurately reproduced with correct proportions, colors (blue, orange, and white/gray), and details. The official logo includes the team name 'KNICKS' above a basketball with 'NEW YORK' text. Verify proper positioning on the basketball surface with appropriate perspective distortion if needed. Award 10 points for an accurate logo with all elements, 5 points for a simplified but recognizable version, and 0 points if the logo is unrecognizable or missing key elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the close-up perspective effectively achieved?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the SVG successfully creates a close-up view of the basketball. This may involve techniques like partial visibility of the ball, detail enhancement, potential shadow/highlight effects to emphasize proximity, or other perspective techniques. Give 10 points for convincing close-up rendering with appropriate depth cues, 5 points if the perspective is present but not convincing, and 3 points if the image appears flat with no close-up qualities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code is structured to display correctly across different browsers and viewports. Check for properly defined viewBox, preserveAspectRatio attributes, and responsive design considerations. Code with strong robustness should use relative units where appropriate and include fallback options. Give 10 points for fully responsive SVG that maintains proportions across viewports, 5 points for functional but fixed-size implementation, and 0 points if the SVG breaks in common scenarios.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visual (e.g., 1. Subtle animation like a spinning ball 2. Interactive elements like hover effects 3. Realistic texture/lighting effects like specular highlights). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessarily complex paths that could be simplified 2. Duplicate elements that serve the same visual purpose 3. Excessive detail that impacts performance without visual benefit. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visualization is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as logical grouping of SVG elements), proper naming of IDs/classes, and reuse of common elements through <defs> or similar techniques. Deduct 5 points if elements are not logically grouped; deduct 5 points if there's excessive repetition of similar path definitions; deduct 5 points if no comments or organizational structure exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Accurate brand color usage according to NY Knicks official colors 2) Proper proportions and visual balance 3) Appropriate level of detail for an SVG illustration. Deduct 3 points for each color inaccuracy, 5 points for poor proportions, and 5 points for inappropriate detail level (either too simplistic or unnecessarily complex). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG optimized for performance and compatibility?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG is efficiently implemented: 1) Paths are optimized without unnecessary points 2) Appropriate use of SVG primitive shapes where possible instead of complex paths 3) Reasonable file size without bloat. Deduct 5 points for unoptimized paths with excessive points, 3 points for using complex paths where simple primitives would suffice, and 5 points for unnecessarily large file size due to poor optimization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}