@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/online-music-theory-learning-website.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 521,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Create an online music theory learning website with introduction pages covering theoretical knowledge of scales, chords, etc. Provide audio examples so users can listen to different scales and chords. Users should be able to practice simple chord combinations, and the website should be able to determine if users' combinations are correct.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core music theory content fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the foundational music theory content, including scales (major, minor, modal), chords (triads, sevenths, extensions), and progressions. Score 0 if no theory content is implemented, 5 if only basic definitions are provided without examples, and 10 if comprehensive explanations with visual representations (staff notation, keyboard diagrams) are included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the audio playback system functional?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the website includes a proper audio system that allows users to listen to scales, chords, and progressions. Check if the implementation uses Web Audio API or a similar technology with proper sound quality. Deduct 5 points if only pre-recorded samples are used without dynamic generation capability, and 3 points if there's noticeable latency (>200ms) between user action and sound playback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the interactive chord practice feature properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether users can practice combining chords, with proper validation of correctness according to music theory rules. Check if the system provides feedback on chord progressions, highlighting errors or suggesting improvements. Deduct 5 points if the validation logic has errors in music theory principles, and 3 points if the feedback is not specific enough to help users learn. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the music visualization component implemented effectively?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes visual representations of musical concepts (such as piano keyboard, guitar fretboard, or musical notation). The visualization should be interactive and synchronized with the audio. Deduct 5 points if the visualization is static, 3 points if it doesn't accurately represent the audio being played, and 5 points if it's not responsive across different screen sizes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unsupported browsers, audio playback issues, user input errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Real-time audio visualization 2. AI-powered chord suggestion system 3. Interactive progression builder with historical examples). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple audio engines coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to music theory learning (e.g., a full social media system) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core learning functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating audio engine/theory content/user interface layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Audio playback starts within 100ms of user input 2) Visual feedback is synchronized with audio within 50ms 3) Clear visual guidance for interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for significant audio-visual desynchronization, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/online-quiz-platform-discipline-inspection.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1711,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Pay attention to ensuring the generated code is executable for demonstration. I want to build an online quiz platform for discipline inspection and supervision business knowledge. Please help generate code and inform me about the process and methods for constructing this platform.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the quiz system core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements question management through HTML/JavaScript, including multiple question types (single choice, multiple choice, true/false, fill-in-the-blank), answer validation logic, scoring algorithms, and timer functionality. Score 0 if core quiz logic is not implemented, 5 if only basic question display is implemented, and 10 if all question types and validation mechanisms are fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the discipline inspection knowledge base management system implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the platform includes comprehensive knowledge categorization (party discipline, administrative supervision, case investigation, etc.), question bank management with CRUD operations, difficulty level classification, and tag-based filtering. Deduct 5 points if knowledge categorization is incomplete, and 3 points if search functionality is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the user management and progress tracking system designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether user authentication, role-based access control (admin/instructor/student), learning progress tracking, score history, and performance analytics are implemented. Two-way verification of user sessions and data persistence is required. Deduct 5 points if user role management is missing, and 3 points if progress tracking is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete platform architecture and data flow constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes complete platform architecture with frontend-backend separation, RESTful API design, database schema for questions/users/results, and real-time result synchronization. Deduct 5 points if API documentation is not provided, and 3 points if database relationships are poorly designed. Give 10 points if fully implemented with proper MVC architecture.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network timeouts, invalid quiz submissions, concurrent user access, data corruption, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Adaptive difficulty adjustment based on performance 2. Real-time leaderboards and gamification elements 3. AI-powered question recommendations 4. Interactive case study simulations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scoring systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to quiz platform (e.g., built-in social media features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations during quiz taking). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core quiz functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating quiz logic/UI components/API layers), input validation and sanitization, security measures (SQL injection prevention, XSS protection), and code organization. Deduct 5 points if security vulnerabilities are found or proper validation is missing; deduct 5 points if the code structure is monolithic without separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if no error logging mechanism exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational platform design principles: 1) Professional and trustworthy color scheme suitable for government/institutional use 2) Clear information hierarchy with proper spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Accessible typography (body font size ≥ 14px, high contrast ratios). Deduct 3 points for each cluttered visual element, 5 points for unprofessional color combinations, and 5 points for poor readability. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the quiz-taking experience conforms to user expectations: 1) Question navigation and submission feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between questions with duration controlled between 200-400ms 3) Clear progress indicators and visual feedback for user actions 4) Intuitive quiz interface without cognitive load. Deduct 5 points for each operation without proper feedback, 3 points for confusing navigation flow, and 5 points for unclear quiz status indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/online-text-editor-with-code-highlighting.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1132,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. I need to implement online text preview and online editing, as well as code highlighting.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the text editor component properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a functional text editor with basic operations (cursor movement, text selection, copy/paste, undo/redo). Score 0 if the core editor functionality is not implemented, 5 if only basic text input works, and 10 if all standard editing features are fully implemented with keyboard shortcuts.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is code syntax highlighting correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the syntax highlighting supports multiple programming languages, accurately identifies language tokens (keywords, strings, comments, etc.), and renders them with appropriate colors. Deduct 5 points if only one language is supported, 3 points if token recognition has significant errors, and 2 points if the highlighting has performance issues with large files. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the preview functionality properly synchronized with the editor?",
-      "description": "Check if the preview updates in real-time as text is edited, handles different content types appropriately (Markdown, HTML, code, etc.), and maintains scroll position synchronization between editor and preview panes. Deduct 5 points if the preview lags significantly behind edits, 3 points for incorrect rendering of content types, and 3 points if scroll synchronization is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the online collaboration or saving mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes functionality for saving content online, sharing edited content, or real-time collaboration features. Check for autosave functionality, version history, and collaboration indicators. Deduct 5 points if there's no persistence mechanism, 3 points if changes can be lost during page refresh, and 3 points if there's no way to share content with others. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as large file uploads, network interruption, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-based code suggestions 2. Multiple theme support 3. Integrated documentation lookup). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple text parsing libraries) 2. Function modules unrelated to text editing (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., overly complex UI transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating editor logic/view/data layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern code editor principles: 1) Appropriate contrast between text and background 2) Clear distinction between editor and preview areas 3) Professional font selection (monospace for code, appropriate font sizes). Deduct 3 points for poor readability, 5 points for confusing layout or unclear visual hierarchy, and 5 points for inadequate visual feedback during interactions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Text input response ≤ 50ms 2) Highlighting updates within 100ms 3) Preview updates within 300ms. Deduct 5 points for noticeable input lag, 3 points for jarring transitions between editing and previewing, and 5 points for UI freezing during processing of large files. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/party-history-quiz-module.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 929,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Now I need to create a Party History Quiz module with a backend using SpringBoot + MyBatis Plus, frontend using Vue3+TS, and MySQL as the database. Please help me design the database (remember to include comments), then write the backend and frontend code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the database design comprehensive and well-documented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the database schema includes all necessary tables (users, questions, answers, quiz sessions, user progress), proper relationships (foreign keys), appropriate indexes for performance, and clear field comments. Check if the SQL script is executable and follows MySQL best practices with proper data types, constraints, and normalization. Score 0 if missing core tables, 5 if basic tables exist but lack optimization, 10 if fully optimized with comments and proper relationships.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the SpringBoot + MyBatis Plus backend completely implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the backend includes proper layered architecture (controller, service, mapper), complete CRUD operations for all entities, proper exception handling, input validation, and authentication/authorization mechanisms. Verify MyBatis Plus is correctly configured with optimized SQL queries. Deduct 3 points for missing layers, 3 points for incomplete API endpoints, 4 points for missing authentication. Give 10 points if all components are properly implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the Vue3+TS frontend implementation complete with TypeScript types?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the frontend uses proper TypeScript interfaces/types for all data models, implements component composition with Composition API, includes proper routing setup, state management, and form validation. Check for type safety throughout the codebase without any 'any' types. Deduct 3 points for missing TypeScript interfaces, 3 points for improper component structure, 4 points if not using Vue3 features appropriately. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the Party History Quiz functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the quiz system includes question randomization, answer validation, scoring mechanism, progress tracking, and results display. Verify if the quiz supports different question types (multiple choice, true/false, fill-in-the-blank), difficulty levels, and categories of Party history. Deduct 5 points if core quiz logic is missing, 3 points if tracking/progress features are incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common abnormal situations (invalid inputs, network failures, database errors, concurrent user access) and provides friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check for input sanitization, proper logging, and transaction management. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time leaderboard 2. Achievement system 3. Interactive knowledge cards 4. Timed challenges 5. Social sharing of quiz results). Add 2 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple authentication mechanisms) 2. Function modules unrelated to Party history quiz (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (proper separation of concerns), code reusability, test coverage (unit tests, integration tests), and build process automation (CI/CD configuration). Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (red and gold theme appropriate for Party history, but not overwhelming) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast quiz navigation, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/peer-competition-statistics-table-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 428,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please help me create a webpage for a peer competition statistics table. It should display student names at the beginning, followed by statistics for each exam, and have the capability to save data when closed.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is a complete HTML structure with table implementation provided?",
-      "description": "Check if the HTML structure includes proper DOCTYPE, head, body sections, and a well-structured table with appropriate headers for student names and exam scores. Evaluate whether semantic HTML elements are used (like <thead>, <tbody>, and proper <th> elements). Score 0 if the basic table structure is missing, 5 if basic implementation exists but lacks semantic elements, 10 if fully implemented with semantic elements and proper structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the data management system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes functionality to add, edit, and delete student records and exam scores. Check if the implementation allows for flexible addition of new exams. Deduct 5 points if editing functionality is missing, 3 points if deletion capability is absent, and 2 points if adding new exams isn't supported. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence mechanism correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether localStorage or IndexedDB is properly used to save the table data when the page is closed, and whether data is correctly retrieved when the page is reopened. Check if error handling for storage quota limits or private browsing mode is implemented. Deduct 5 points if data isn't automatically saved on page close, 3 points if loading saved data is buggy, and 5 points if no error handling for storage failures exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are sorting and filtering capabilities implemented for the statistics table?",
-      "description": "Check if the table includes functionality to sort data by student name or exam scores (ascending/descending), and if filtering options are available for quickly finding specific students or score ranges. Deduct 5 points if sorting functionality is missing or incomplete, 3 points if no filtering options exist, and 2 points if these features aren't intuitive to use. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid input data, localStorage unavailability, concurrent edits by multiple users, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual statistics like charts/graphs 2. Color-coding for performance levels 3. Export functionality to CSV/Excel 4. Print optimized view). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple sorting algorithms) 2. Function modules unrelated to peer competition statistics (e.g., built-in games) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if variable/function naming is unclear or inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual jank during table interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/periodic-table-for-middle-school-chemistry.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 314,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code for demonstration. Create an HTML code for teaching the periodic table of elements for middle school chemistry.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the periodic table structure fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the HTML code correctly represents the standard periodic table layout with all 118 elements positioned in their correct groups and periods. Check if the table maintains proper spacing and alignment between elements. Score 0 if elements are missing or misplaced, 5 if the basic structure is implemented but with minor positioning errors, and 10 if the periodic table structure is complete and accurately arranged.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the element details comprehensive and educationally appropriate?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether each element includes essential information for middle school education: atomic number, symbol, name, atomic weight, and electron configuration. Check if information is presented in a clear hierarchy with appropriate technical detail for the middle school level. Deduct 5 points if key information is missing, 3 points if the detail level is inappropriate for middle schoolers. Give 10 points if comprehensive and age-appropriate.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are interactive features implemented for learning enhancement?",
-      "description": "Assess if the code includes interactive features that aid learning, such as element highlighting, pop-up information cards, filtering by element properties, or visual grouping by element categories. Deduct 5 points if no interactivity is implemented, 3 points if interactions are limited or buggy. Give 10 points for comprehensive, smooth, and educationally valuable interactions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the periodic table visually coded for element categorization?",
-      "description": "Check if the code implements visual distinctions (colors, patterns, borders) to differentiate element categories (metals, non-metals, metalloids, noble gases, etc.) and if a legend is provided to explain these visual codes. Deduct 5 points if categories are not visually distinguished, 3 points if visual coding is present but confusing or lacks a legend. Give 10 points for clear, consistent, and educational visual categorization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common issues (such as various screen sizes, browser compatibility, loading failures for resources) and provides fallbacks or graceful degradation. Code with strong robustness should work across modern browsers and accommodate different viewport sizes. Give 10 points for comprehensive robustness with responsive design, 5 points if partially robust, and 0 points if serious compatibility issues exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Element comparison tool 2. Quiz/game components 3. Interactive electron configuration visualizations 4. 3D element models). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Overlapping information displayed multiple times unnecessarily 2. Features unrelated to chemistry education 3. Excessive animations or effects that distract from learning. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundant code interferes with the educational purpose.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (semantic HTML structure, separation of concerns with CSS/JavaScript), maintainability, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if non-semantic div/span elements dominate the structure; deduct 5 points if CSS/JS is not separated from HTML; deduct 5 points if the code contains unnecessary dependencies or unoptimized resources. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional educational design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows educational interface principles: 1) Appropriate color contrast for readability (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance) 2) Clear visual hierarchy with primary information emphasized 3) Adequate white space for cognitive processing 4) Age-appropriate typography (sans-serif fonts, size ≥ 14px). Deduct 3 points for each readability issue, 5 points for poor contrast ratios, and 5 points for cluttered information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the interactive learning experience effective and age-appropriate?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements support middle school learning objectives: 1) Interactions teach scientific concepts rather than just entertain 2) Feedback is immediate and instructive 3) Progressive disclosure of complex information prevents cognitive overload. Deduct 5 points for interactions that don't support learning goals, 3 points for overly complex interactions beyond middle school comprehension, and 5 points for missing scaffolding in presenting information. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/personalized-learning-recommendation-website-vue-django-mysql.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1324,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Be sure that the code you provide is executable. Based on the content, help me build a personalized learning recommendation website powered by knowledge graphs from scratch, step by step. The frontend will use Vue, the backend will use the Django framework, and MySQL will serve as the database.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the knowledge graph construction and visualization fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements knowledge graph data modeling through Vue.js frontend and Django backend, including node/edge relationships, graph traversal algorithms, and interactive visualization components. Check if D3.js or similar libraries are properly integrated for graph rendering. Score 0 if core graph structure is missing, 5 if only basic nodes/edges are displayed, and 10 if complete interactive knowledge graph with search, filtering, and relationship exploration is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the personalized recommendation algorithm properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the recommendation engine includes collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, or hybrid approaches. Check if user behavior tracking, learning path analysis, and preference modeling are implemented. Verify integration between Django models and recommendation logic. Deduct 5 points if only basic similarity matching is used, 3 points if real-time recommendation updates are missing. Full score requires sophisticated ML-based recommendations with A/B testing capability.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the full-stack architecture properly designed with Vue-Django-MySQL integration?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system follows proper RESTful API design between Vue frontend and Django backend, with appropriate serializers, viewsets, and routing. Evaluate MySQL database schema design for users, learning materials, knowledge entities, and relationships. Deduct 5 points if API versioning is missing, 3 points if database indexing is inadequate. Requires proper CORS handling, authentication middleware, and optimized query performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the learning progress tracking and analytics system complete?",
-      "description": "Verify implementation of user learning journey tracking, progress visualization, achievement systems, and learning analytics dashboard. Check if the system includes learning path optimization, completion rates, time-spent analytics, and adaptive difficulty adjustment. Deduct 5 points if progress persistence is not implemented, 3 points if analytics visualization is basic. Full score requires comprehensive learning insights with predictive analytics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust and handles edge cases effectively?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid graph queries, failed API calls, database connection issues, malformed learning data, etc.) and provides friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include proper exception handling, input validation, and graceful degradation, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there innovative features that enhance the learning experience?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes compelling features that improve personalization (e.g., 1. AI-powered learning path generation 2. Social learning communities with peer recommendations 3. Adaptive content difficulty based on performance 4. Multi-modal content integration 5. Gamification elements). Add 2-3 points for each well-implemented innovative feature that demonstrates technical sophistication (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant or unnecessary features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate recommendation logic implementations 2. Unused Vue components or Django apps unrelated to learning recommendations 3. Over-engineered graph visualizations that impact performance without adding value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core learning recommendation functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code demonstrate proper engineering quality and architecture?",
-      "description": "Review modular design separating concerns (Vue components, Django apps, database layers), proper state management (Vuex), API documentation, and testing coverage. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if Django best practices are ignored; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate exceeds 30%; deduct 5 points if no automated testing or CI/CD pipeline is implemented. Full score requires clean architecture with proper separation of concerns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the user interface meet modern educational platform design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the Vue.js frontend follows contemporary educational UX principles: 1) Intuitive navigation with clear learning paths 2) Accessible color contrast ratios (WCAG 2.1 AA compliance) 3) Responsive design across devices 4) Professional typography hierarchy with readable font sizes (≥14px body text). Deduct 3 points for each cluttered interface element, 5 points for poor accessibility, and 5 points for non-responsive layout components. Full score requires polished educational platform aesthetics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Are the interactive elements smooth and provide excellent user experience?",
-      "description": "Judge whether dynamic interactions meet educational platform standards: 1) Knowledge graph navigation with smooth zoom/pan (60fps) 2) Recommendation updates with loading states ≤200ms 3) Form submissions with proper validation feedback 4) Search functionality with real-time suggestions 5) Progress indicators and achievement animations. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for missing loading states, and 5 points for confusing navigation flow. Full score requires seamless, intuitive learning experience.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/pomodoro-diary-system-vue-springboot-mysql.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1273,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please utilize your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the code you generate is executable whenever possible. 2.2.1 Front-end Development Technology Overview:\n\n(1) WeChat Mini Program Development: As a lightweight application, WeChat Mini Programs allow users to directly use them within the WeChat environment without separate downloads. Developers can rely on the WeChat Mini Program framework, components, and APIs for efficient development, implementing interface construction and interactive functions. Through Mini Program development, users can conveniently perform campus second-hand transactions and life services operations within WeChat without switching to other applications.\n\nVue Framework Application: As a popular JavaScript framework, Vue is primarily used for creating user interfaces. Its application in web-based management system development enables developers to build interfaces quickly and efficiently. The Vue framework provides a series of components and directives that allow developers to easily implement various functions, while also offering reactive data binding and component-based development features, which are beneficial for code organization and maintenance. Now, based on the above content, please write about my Pomodoro diary system, which uses Vue, Spring Boot, and MySQL technologies.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Pomodoro timing system properly implemented in Vue?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the code correctly implements core Pomodoro functionality: 25-minute work periods, 5-minute short breaks, 15-minute long breaks after 4 work sessions. Check for visual countdown timer, progress indicators, and customizable time settings. Score 0 if the core timing mechanism is absent, 5 if basic timing exists but lacks configurability, and 10 if the implementation includes sound notifications, visual progress tracking, and allows user customization of time intervals.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the diary entry functionality properly connected to the Pomodoro system?",
-      "description": "Verify that completed Pomodoro sessions automatically prompt for diary entries or task completion notes. The system should record timestamps, duration, associated tasks, and completion status. Check if users can add reflections on productivity or notes about the completed work. Deduct 5 points if diary entries aren't linked to Pomodoro sessions, 3 points if entries lack metadata like timestamps or categories. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the Spring Boot backend architecture properly designed with appropriate endpoints?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the API design follows RESTful principles with proper resource naming, HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE), and status codes. Check if controllers handle Pomodoro sessions, diary entries, user authentication, and data analytics endpoints. API versioning and documentation should be present. Deduct 5 points for missing authentication middleware, 3 points for inconsistent endpoint design patterns, and 5 points for poor error handling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the MySQL database schema optimized for the Pomodoro diary system?",
-      "description": "Review whether the database design includes appropriate tables (users, pomodoro_sessions, diary_entries, tasks, categories) with proper relationships and constraints. Evaluate if indexes are used for frequently queried fields, if normalization principles are followed, and if the schema supports analytics and reporting features. Deduct 5 points for missing foreign key relationships, 3 points for poor field type choices, and 5 points if data integrity constraints are inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption during a Pomodoro session, failed diary saves, authentication failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check if the application maintains state during browser refreshes. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Productivity analytics and visualizations 2. Intelligent task suggestions based on past performance 3. Focus mode with website blocking 4. Integration with calendar systems). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple timer implementations) 2. Function modules unrelated to Pomodoro/diary functionality (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations during focus time). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating frontend components, backend services, and data access layers), unit test coverage for critical timing logic and data persistence, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state management is poorly implemented; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching that supports focus (calming colors during work periods, energizing colors during breaks) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for distracting color combinations during focus time, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Timer updates occur without visual jitter 2) Transition between work and break states is clear but not jarring 3) Diary entry forms appear with appropriate timing and smooth animations. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy timer countdowns, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}