@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/animated-raindrop-effect-on-glass.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 107,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration.\nPlease help me implement the following requirements using SVG code. The requirement is to create: Design an animated raindrop effect that shows raindrops sliding down glass.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Are the basic raindrop elements properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether SVG elements (path, circle, etc.) are correctly used to create realistic raindrop shapes. The raindrops should have proper form with curved paths to simulate water droplets. Deduct 5 points if drops are simple circles without proper water droplet shape; deduct 7 points if no transparency or gradient is applied to create a water-like appearance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the sliding animation properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the raindrops slide down naturally with physics-like motion (acceleration, slight zigzagging). Check for proper use of SVG animation elements (animate, animateTransform, animateMotion) or JavaScript-based animation. Deduct 5 points if movement is linear without acceleration; deduct 7 points if all raindrops follow exactly the same path without variation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the glass surface effect convincingly represented?",
-      "description": "Review how the code creates a convincing glass surface illusion through appropriate use of filters, gradients, or opacity. The glass should appear as a surface with appropriate reflective properties. Look for blur effects, subtle transparency, or light refraction simulation. Deduct 5 points if there's no attempt to simulate glass; deduct 3 points if the glass effect lacks realism. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the raindrop collision and merging behavior implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the implementation includes realistic raindrop interactions such as collision detection, merging of smaller drops into larger ones, or splitting of drops. Deduct 5 points if there's no collision detection between raindrops; deduct 7 points if raindrops pass through each other without interaction. Award full 10 points only if sophisticated merging behavior is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle varying screen sizes, browser compatibility issues, and performance optimization for animation rendering. Look for proper event handling, memory management for continuous animations, and use of requestAnimationFrame for smooth rendering. Deduct 5 points if the animation causes significant performance issues; deduct 3 points if the code lacks resize handling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive raindrops that respond to mouse/touch 2. Realistic sound effects synchronized with raindrop movement 3. Dynamic background that changes with rain intensity). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant calculation of raindrop positions 2. Unnecessary complex filters that impact performance 3. Unused or duplicate SVG definitions that bloat the code. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core raindrop animation is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of raindrop creation, animation, and rendering logic), reuse of SVG patterns/symbols, and optimization techniques such as requestAnimationFrame. Deduct 5 points if global variables are excessively used; deduct 5 points if animation logic is not separated from element creation; deduct 5 points if there's no performance optimization for numerous raindrops. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual effect meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows realistic water physics: 1) Appropriate transparency for water droplets 2) Natural color variation in drops based on lighting 3) Proper sizing distribution (smaller at top, potentially larger as they merge). Deduct 3 points for unrealistic water coloring, 5 points for uniform drop sizes that don't vary, and 5 points for unnatural movement patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the animation conforms to natural physics: 1) Smooth acceleration as drops slide down 2) Natural deformation of drops during movement 3) Realistic trail/streak effect behind faster-moving drops. Deduct 5 points for rigid movement without organic feel, 3 points for stuttering animation at higher raindrop counts, and 5 points if drop movement doesn't respond to container size changes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/barley-and-wheat-crop-plants.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 126,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Barley and wheat are crop plants in agriculture used for food and grain.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the code correctly sets up the SVG document with appropriate viewport dimensions, namespaces, and root elements. Check if the SVG has proper width, height attributes and viewBox for responsive scaling. Deduct 5 points if viewport dimensions are not properly defined, 3 points if namespaces are missing, and 5 points if responsive scaling is not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the barley plant elements accurately visualized?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the barley plant is correctly depicted with distinctive features (long awns extending from grains, erect ears, slender stems). Check if the implementation includes authentic details like barley's characteristic bushy head and spike-like appearance. Score 0 if no barley visualization is present, 5 if basic shape is implemented without characteristic details, and 10 if the visualization is botanically accurate and visually distinctive.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the wheat plant elements accurately visualized?",
-      "description": "Examine if the wheat plant visualization includes proper characteristics (compact head, shorter awns compared to barley, broader leaves). Verify if the wheat ears show the classic drooping posture when mature and appropriate coloration. Score 0 if no wheat visualization is present, 5 if only basic wheat shape is implemented, and 10 if the visualization includes accurate botanical details and growth structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there appropriate agricultural context and scene composition?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG includes contextual elements that represent an agricultural setting (soil line, field backdrop, sun or sky indicators). Review whether the composition creates a cohesive agricultural scene rather than isolated plant elements. Deduct 3 points if plants are shown without context, 5 points if the composition lacks depth or perspective, and 2 points if the scene lacks agricultural relevance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes fallback options for browsers with limited SVG support, uses groups for logical organization of elements, and implements proper element IDs/classes for potential styling/scripting. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle rendering issues and be maintainable. Give 10 points for robust implementation, 5 points for average implementations, and 0 points if critical robustness features are missing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Animation showing plant growth stages 2. Interactive elements showing botanical information on hover/click 3. Seasonal variations or day/night transitions). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate definitions of the same elements 2. Unnecessary complex paths that could be simplified 3. Over-detailed elements that don't contribute to botanical accuracy but increase file size. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundant code significantly impacts rendering performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG optimization techniques (such as path simplification, appropriate use of symbols for repeated elements, clean grouping structure), code comments, and readability. Deduct 5 points if patterns/symbols aren't used for repeated elements; deduct 5 points if paths contain unnecessary precision or points; deduct 5 points if there's no logical organization of SVG elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern SVG best practices: 1) Appropriate color palette for agricultural visualization 2) Proper scaling and proportions between elements 3) Visual hierarchy that emphasizes botanical differences between barley and wheat. Deduct 3 points for inappropriate color choices, 5 points for disproportionate elements, and 5 points for lack of visual differentiation between the crop types. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any included interactions enhance understanding: 1) Smooth transitions if animations are present 2) Responsive hover/click states if interactive 3) Proper loading sequence if complex. Deduct 5 points for jarring animations, 3 points for unresponsive interactive elements, and 5 points for poor performance with complex elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/bell-ringing-alerting-sound.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 173,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable and can be displayed. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The bell rang with a clang, alerting us with its sound.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG bell shape accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly represents a bell shape with appropriate curves, dimensions, and proportions. The bell should have a dome shape, a clapper inside, and possibly a mount at the top. Score 0 if no recognizable bell shape is present, 5 if the basic shape is there but lacks detail, and 10 if the bell is accurately portrayed with proper dimensions and elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the animation for the bell ringing/clanging implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes animation for the bell ringing motion (swinging or vibrating) and potentially for the clapper hitting the bell sides. The animation should be smooth and represent a realistic bell movement. Deduct 5 points if only static elements are implemented, and 3 points if the animation exists but is choppy or unrealistic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are sound effects for the bell clang integrated with the visual?",
-      "description": "Verify if the implementation includes audio elements synchronized with the bell animation to produce the 'clang' sound. The audio should trigger appropriately with the visual movement. Deduct 5 points if sound is implemented but not synchronized with the animation, and 10 points if no sound implementation exists at all. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include user interaction to ring the bell?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code allows users to interact with the bell (click, drag, or other interaction methods) to trigger the ringing animation and sound. The interaction should be intuitive and responsive. Deduct 5 points if interaction exists but has noticeable lag or is unintuitive, and 10 points if no interaction is implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, audio loading failures, interaction edge cases, etc.) and provide fallbacks or error handling. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual effects like ripples or echoes when the bell rings 2. Multiple bell tones or sounds based on interaction intensity 3. Customizable bell appearance options). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple animation systems operating simultaneously) 2. Function modules unrelated to the bell visualization (e.g., unnecessary UI controls) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive particle systems or filters). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating SVG definitions, animation logic, and audio handling), code reusability, and optimal use of SVG/JavaScript features. Deduct 5 points if global namespace pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplicates functionality unnecessarily; deduct 5 points if inefficient rendering techniques are used. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the bell visualization follows modern design principles: 1) Appropriate use of colors and gradients for a metallic appearance 2) Proper proportions and perspective 3) Attention to details like reflections or textures. Deduct 3 points for unrealistic color choices, 5 points for poor proportions that make the bell unrecognizable, and 5 points for lack of essential visual details. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the animation smooth and realistic?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the bell animation conforms to physical characteristics: 1) Natural swinging motion with appropriate easing 2) Realistic timing for the clapper hitting the bell 3) Proper decay in animation intensity over time. Deduct 5 points for jerky or unnatural movement, 3 points for unrealistic timing between visual and audio, and 5 points for animations that don't follow natural physics. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/black-and-white-close-up-letter-e-image.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 151,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure any code you generate is executable and can be displayed properly. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a close up of a black and white image of a letter e",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core SVG implementation of letter 'e' properly defined?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG definition includes proper path coordinates that clearly form the letter 'e' shape. Check if the <path> element uses appropriate d-attribute commands or if alternative SVG primitives are used effectively. Score 3 points if a basic 'e' shape is present, 7 points if the proportions are correct, and 10 points if the implementation shows professional typographic details (like proper terminals and counters).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the black and white contrast effectively implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess if the SVG properly implements the black and white contrast requirement. The foreground and background should have clear differentiation with appropriate fill/stroke attributes. Check for proper use of colors (#000000 for black, #FFFFFF for white) or equivalent RGB/HSL values. Deduct 5 points if grayscale is used instead of pure black and white, and 8 points if color is used. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the 'close-up' effect properly rendered?",
-      "description": "Verify if the implementation conveys a close-up impression of the letter 'e'. This might involve appropriate viewBox settings, scaling, or zoomed-in details that focus on specific parts of the letter. Deduct 5 points if the letter appears as a standard full view rather than a close-up. Deduct another 3 points if the close-up doesn't highlight interesting typographic features. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code optimized and efficiently structured?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the technical efficiency of the SVG code. Check for appropriate use of viewBox, unnecessary nested groups, optimal path commands (using relative commands where appropriate), and path optimization. Deduct 3 points for each inefficiency: excessive points in paths, redundant transformations, or missing viewBox. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles edge cases properly, such as responsiveness across different viewport sizes, browser compatibility considerations, and fallback options. Code with strong robustness should work consistently across modern browsers and adapt to different container sizes. Deduct 3 points if no responsiveness handling is implemented, 3 points if there's no fallback for older browsers, and 4 points if the SVG breaks in certain contexts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes creative enhancements while maintaining the black and white close-up requirement (e.g., 1. Subtle animation that emphasizes the letter's form 2. Creative use of filters for texture 3. Innovative typographic treatment that adds interest). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check for three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary elements or attributes that don't contribute to the visual outcome 2. Duplicated definitions or patterns 3. Excessive detail that negatively impacts performance without visual benefit. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core rendering is affected by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as proper indentation, meaningful class/ID naming, appropriate comments), optimal use of SVG features (defs, symbols, groups), and maintainability. Deduct 3 points if naming conventions are poor, 3 points if the SVG structure is overly complex without justification, and 4 points if the implementation mixes presentation and structure inappropriately. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG implementation follows typography principles: 1) Proper weight distribution in the letter forms 2) Clean, crisp edges without artifacts 3) Balanced negative space within the letter's counter. Deduct 3 points for jagged edges or pixelation, 3 points for improper weight distribution, and 4 points for awkward proportions or poor composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the implementation accessible and semantically correct?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG includes proper accessibility features and semantic markup: 1) Appropriate title and description tags 2) ARIA attributes where needed 3) Proper contrast ratio for visibility. Deduct 3 points for missing title/desc elements, 3 points for lack of ARIA attributes, and 4 points for inaccessible implementations that screen readers would struggle with. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/black-and-white-person-profile-square-photo.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 152,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Pay attention to ensure that the code you generate is executable. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a black and white photo of a person's profile in a square.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG profile image correctly implemented with proper element usage?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG implementation uses appropriate elements (path, circle, rect, etc.) to create the profile silhouette. SVG should have proper viewBox and dimensions. Score 0 if no SVG is created, 5 if basic shapes are used but profile is not recognizable, 10 if the profile is clearly identifiable as a person's silhouette.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the black and white effect properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code correctly implements the black and white effect using appropriate SVG attributes (fill, stroke) or filters. Check that no colors other than black, white, and grayscale values are used. Deduct 5 points if colors are used, and 3 points if grayscale implementation is inefficient. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the profile image proportioned correctly in a square frame?",
-      "description": "Verify that the SVG has equal width and height (perfect square), and the profile image is properly contained within the boundaries without awkward cropping. Deduct 5 points if the frame isn't square, 3 points if the profile doesn't fit properly within the frame. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include human facial features with appropriate detail?",
-      "description": "Check if facial features (nose, lips, eye, ear outline, etc.) are properly defined in the profile view. Score 0 if no facial features are present, 5 if features are basic/crude, 10 if features are well-defined and proportionally accurate to create a realistic profile silhouette.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different viewport sizes without distortion, includes appropriate fallbacks for SVG-unsupported browsers, and has clean, well-organized code structure. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no responsiveness or fallbacks are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation on hover 2. Creative use of SVG filters for texture effects 3. Interactive elements that enhance the profile). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary nested groups or elements 2. Verbose path definitions that could be simplified 3. Excessive filters or effects that don't contribute to the black and white profile aesthetic. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core requirements are obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review coding best practices like proper indentation, meaningful class/ID names, optimization of SVG paths, and appropriate documentation/comments. Deduct 5 points for excessive inline styles when classes would be more appropriate; deduct 5 points if the SVG has unnecessary precision in path coordinates; deduct 5 points if there are no comments explaining complex path structures. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows principles of good silhouette design: 1) Clear contrast between figure and ground 2) Balanced negative space around the profile 3) Professional level of detail appropriate for SVG format. Deduct 3 points for poor figure-ground relationship, 5 points for awkward composition within the square, and 5 points for inappropriate level of detail (either too simplistic or needlessly complex). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the file size and performance optimized?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG implementation is optimized for web use: 1) SVG code is minified or reasonably compact 2) Unnecessary metadata is removed 3) Path data is optimized without losing visual quality. Deduct 5 points for each unoptimized aspect: bloated path data, unnecessary attributes, or inefficient implementation that would cause rendering performance issues. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/black-and-white-picture-of-a-sliding-door.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 62,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, expert responses. Be sure that any code you create is executable and can be properly displayed. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a picture of a black and white picture of a sliding door.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG sliding door structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly uses SVG elements to construct a sliding door structure, including door frames, door panels, tracks, and handles. Check if the geometric proportions are realistic and the structural relationships are logical. Score 0 if basic door structure is missing, 5 if only simple rectangles represent doors, and 10 if detailed architectural elements like frames, panels, tracks, and hardware are properly modeled with accurate proportions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the black and white visual styling properly executed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG implements proper black and white styling with appropriate use of grayscale values, stroke weights, and fill patterns. Check for consistent monochrome palette, proper contrast ratios, and effective use of shadows/highlights to create depth. Deduct 5 points if colors other than black, white, and gray are used. Deduct 3 points if contrast is insufficient for clear visibility. Full score requires sophisticated grayscale gradients and shading.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the sliding door demonstrate functional sliding mechanics?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes interactive sliding functionality through CSS animations or JavaScript, with realistic door movement along tracks. Evaluate if the sliding motion follows proper physics (easing, momentum) and visual feedback. Score 0 if no sliding interaction exists, 5 if basic CSS transitions are present, and 10 if smooth, realistic sliding mechanics with proper track constraints and momentum are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are architectural details and hardware components accurately represented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes realistic architectural details such as door handles, lock mechanisms, track systems, frame joints, and panel divisions. Check if hardware elements are proportionally correct and positioned logically. Deduct 3 points for missing essential hardware components, 5 points if proportions are unrealistic, and 2 points for each misplaced architectural element. Full score requires comprehensive detailing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid SVG parameters, browser compatibility issues, animation glitches, etc.) and provide graceful degradation. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases like viewport resizing, interaction conflicts, and rendering failures. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if average robustness, and 0 points if no exception handling exists.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visual experience (e.g., 1. Realistic shadow casting based on light source 2. Multiple door panels with synchronized movement 3. Interactive sound effects for sliding motion 4. Perspective transformation for 3D effect). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements that don't contribute to the door visualization 2. Unnecessary animations or effects unrelated to sliding door functionality 3. Overly complex path definitions that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core door visualization is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG code organization (such as proper grouping with <g> elements, reusable <defs> and symbols), clean markup structure, and maintainable CSS/JavaScript integration. Deduct 5 points if SVG structure is poorly organized or lacks semantic grouping; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if inline styles are overused instead of CSS classes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG design follows professional architectural illustration principles: 1) Consistent line weights and stroke styles 2) Proper use of negative space and composition balance 3) Clear visual hierarchy with appropriate scale relationships 4) Professional drafting standards for technical illustration. Deduct 3 points for each inconsistent visual element, 5 points for poor composition balance, and 5 points for unprofessional line work quality. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the sliding animations conform to realistic motion characteristics: 1) Smooth acceleration/deceleration curves 2) Proper timing functions (300-500ms for door sliding) 3) Visual continuity without jarring transitions 4) Responsive interaction feedback. Deduct 5 points for each choppy animation, 3 points for unrealistic motion physics, and 5 points for poor interaction responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/black-white-outline-map-new-zealand.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 184,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to provide accurate, technical responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for display purposes. Please help me implement the following requirements using SVG code. The requirement is to create: a detailed black and white outline map of New Zealand.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the New Zealand map outline accurately represented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG path accurately depicts New Zealand's shape including North Island, South Island, Stewart Island and other significant islands. The outline should be geographically accurate with proper proportions. Score 3 if only main islands are included, 7 if main islands with proper proportions, and 10 if all significant islands are accurately represented with correct geographical features.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the map properly scaled and positioned within the SVG viewBox?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the map uses appropriate viewBox dimensions and positioning to display the entire country without unnecessary empty space or cropping. The aspect ratio should match New Zealand's actual geography (roughly 3:10 height to width). Deduct 3 points if there's significant empty space, 5 points if any part of the map is cropped, and 3 points if the aspect ratio is distorted.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are internal geographical features included?",
-      "description": "Check whether important internal geographical features are included, such as major lakes (like Lake Taupo), significant mountain ranges, and regional boundaries. Score 3 if only outlines are present, 7 if major lakes and mountains are included, and 10 if detailed internal geography is represented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the black and white styling appropriately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review the use of stroke and fill attributes to create a clean black and white map. Proper contrast should be maintained with appropriate line weights. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent line weights, 5 points for poor contrast choices, and 2 points for unnecessary color usage.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle browser rendering differences, has appropriate fallbacks, and includes proper SVG namespace declarations. Code with strong robustness should be cross-browser compatible and handle scaling appropriately. Give 10 points for robust implementation, 5 points for average implementation with minor issues, and 0 points if the SVG might fail in common browsers.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Hover effects for regional information 2. Smooth zoom or pan functionality 3. Interactive landmarks or points of interest). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessarily complex path definitions that could be simplified 2. Duplicate path segments or overlapping elements 3. Unused SVG elements or attributes that bloat the code. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core representation is compromised by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular structure (e.g., logical grouping of elements), appropriate use of SVG features (like defs, symbols, groups), and code readability. Deduct 5 points if no SVG groups (<g>) are used to organize related elements; deduct 3 points if paths are not optimized; deduct 5 points if the SVG lacks appropriate reusable components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional cartographic standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the map follows professional cartographic principles: 1) Appropriate level of detail for the intended scale 2) Proper stroke weights that scale with view size 3) Clear visual hierarchy between different types of boundaries and features. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent detail levels, 5 points for poor stroke weight choices, and 5 points for unclear visual hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG optimized for performance and filesize?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG implementation is efficient: 1) Path data uses appropriate precision without unnecessary decimal places 2) Path commands are optimized (using relative commands where appropriate) 3) No unnecessary nested groups or transformations. Deduct 3 points for excessive path precision, 4 points for unoptimized path commands, and 5 points for unnecessary nesting or transformations that impact performance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/black-white-vector-microscope.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 194,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable when possible. Please help me implement the following requirement using code: create a black and white vector image of a microscope using SVG code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the microscope's basic structure accurately represented in SVG?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes all essential components of a microscope (eyepiece, objective lenses, stage, body tube, base, light source). Score 0 if fewer than 3 components are present, 5 if most components are included but with proportional issues, and 10 if all components are present with proper proportions and accurate representation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the SVG properly utilize vector graphics principles?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the implementation uses appropriate SVG elements (path, rect, circle, line) instead of bitmap approaches. Check if the code leverages vector advantages like precise shape definitions and mathematical curves. Deduct 3 points if basic shapes are used when paths would be more appropriate, 5 points if the implementation relies on overly complex paths when simpler elements would suffice, and 5 points if the microscope lacks smooth curves where needed.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the black and white requirement strictly followed?",
-      "description": "Verify that the SVG only uses black, white, and grayscale values (using fill, stroke with appropriate opacity/values). Deduct 5 points for each non-grayscale color used. Check that the creator effectively uses contrasting shades to create visual depth despite the monochrome limitation. Deduct 3 points if the image appears flat due to poor contrast management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are SVG viewBox and dimensions properly configured?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG has appropriate viewBox settings ensuring the microscope is properly framed and scales correctly. Evaluate whether the coordinate system is efficiently used (not too much empty space, not cropped). Deduct 5 points if scaling issues are present, 5 points if significant parts of the drawing extend outside the viewBox, and 3 points if there's excessive unused space.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code follows SVG best practices (proper element nesting, attribute formatting, namespace declaration). Check if it works across major browsers without rendering issues. Deduct 5 points for browser-specific implementations, 3 points for improper nesting causing z-index issues, and 5 points for missing essential SVG attributes that affect rendering.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Light ray effect from the microscope base 2. Detailed lens reflections 3. Interactive elements like hover effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Overlapping shapes that could be simplified 2. Unnecessary grouping of elements 3. Overly detailed components that complicate the SVG without adding visual value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the redundant code significantly increases file size or affects rendering performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (logical grouping of SVG elements), meaningful IDs/classes, and code comments explaining complex paths. Deduct 5 points if SVG elements aren't logically grouped, 3 points if there's no descriptive naming for important elements, and 5 points if complex paths lack explanatory comments. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the microscope design follows proper visual principles: 1) Accurate proportions between components 2) Proper use of negative space 3) Clean, precise lines with appropriate stroke weights. Deduct 3 points for disproportionate elements, 5 points for inconsistent line weights, and 5 points for poor spatial arrangement of components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the level of detail appropriate and well-balanced?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the microscope has appropriate detail level: 1) Important parts (lenses, focusing knobs) should have higher detail 2) Background elements should be simplified 3) Overall balance between simplicity and detail should be maintained. Deduct 5 points for excessive detail causing visual noise, 5 points for oversimplification of key components, and 3 points for inconsistent detail levels across the drawing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}