@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/draw-a-heart-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1577,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code for demonstration whenever possible. Write a program that draws a heart.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the heart shape correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the code correctly generates a mathematically accurate heart shape. The heart should have a clear central V-point at the bottom, symmetrical lobes at the top, and smooth curves throughout. Deduct 5 points if the proportions are off, 7 points if the shape is distorted or asymmetrical. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the visualization method appropriate for the task?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the chosen visualization method (SVG, Canvas, CSS, ASCII art, etc.) is suitable and efficient for drawing a heart. Check if the code leverages the chosen technology's strengths. Score 10 points for optimal technology choice with proper implementation, 5 points if the technology is appropriate but implementation is suboptimal, 0 points if an inappropriate method is chosen.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the code provide customization options?",
-      "description": "Check if the code allows for customization of the heart's properties such as size, color, rotation, border style, or fill pattern. Award 3 points for each independently adjustable property (size, color, position, animation, fill pattern), up to a maximum of 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the heart rendering responsive and adaptable?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the heart scales appropriately across different screen sizes and resolutions. The heart should maintain its proportions and quality regardless of the viewing device. Deduct 5 points if the heart distorts on resizing, 3 points if it doesn't adapt to the container size. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, browser compatibility issues, rendering errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Pulsating animation 2. Particle effects 3. Interactive elements that respond to user input). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple drawing methods coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to heart drawing (e.g., unnecessary UI controls) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down rendering). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating drawing logic/view/interaction layers), reusability, and code organization. Deduct 5 points if global namespace pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the heart design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color choice for the heart and background 2) Proper spacing and positioning within the viewport 3) Clean rendering with smooth edges (no jagged lines or pixelation). Deduct 3 points for poor color contrast, 5 points for pixelated or rough edges, and 5 points for poor positioning or framing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any dynamic effects (if implemented) conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Animation timing feels natural (not too fast or slow) 2) Transition effects are smooth without stuttering 3) Interactive elements respond immediately to user input. Deduct 5 points for jerky animations, 3 points for delayed responses to user interaction, and 5 points for animations that feel unnatural or distracting. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/drinking-with-cup-at-bar-svg.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 187,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable and can be displayed.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: create a scene of \"me drinking with a cup at a bar.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic bar scene properly rendered?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG properly creates a recognizable bar environment with correct perspective, depth, and lighting. Elements should include a bar counter, bar stools, shelves with bottles, and appropriate background details that establish the setting. Scoring: 0 points if the scene is unidentifiable as a bar; 5 points if basic elements exist but lack detail; 10 points for a comprehensive and detailed bar setting.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the character representation accurate and detailed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the character ('me') representation including body proportions, posture (sitting position should be natural), facial features, and expression. The character should be properly positioned at the bar. Deduct 3 points if proportions are significantly off; deduct 3 points if the posture looks unnatural; deduct 2 points if facial details are missing or poorly executed; deduct 2 points if the character placement doesn't integrate well with the scene.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the cup/glass properly designed and positioned?",
-      "description": "Assess the drink container design (glass type appropriate for a bar setting), positioning in the character's hand, and details like liquid content, ice, garnish, etc. The character should be in a drinking pose or motion. Deduct 3 points if the glass design is too simplistic; deduct 3 points if the hand-glass interaction looks unnatural; deduct 2 points if liquid details are missing; deduct 2 points if the drinking action isn't clearly depicted.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG implementation technically correct?",
-      "description": "Review the technical aspects of SVG implementation, including proper structure, appropriate use of SVG elements (path, rect, circle, etc.), correct attributes, and syntactical correctness. Check for proper viewBox setting, grouping of related elements (<g> tags), and use of reusable components like definitions (<defs>). Deduct 5 points for incorrect SVG syntax; deduct 3 points for improper viewBox; deduct 2 points for inefficient element usage.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different viewport sizes through responsive design techniques (preserveAspectRatio attribute, percentage-based positioning, etc.). Check if the SVG scales properly without distortion. Deduct 5 points if the image severely distorts when resized; deduct 3 points if elements overlap incorrectly when viewed at different sizes; deduct 2 points if text becomes illegible when scaled.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation of drinking motion 2. Interactive elements that respond to user input 3. Gradient lighting effects that create atmosphere 4. Creative use of filters or masks). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate SVG elements that serve the same purpose 2. Excessive detail that doesn't contribute to the scene but increases file size 3. Unnecessary animations or effects that distract from the main subject. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core elements are obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (such as grouping related elements), code readability (meaningful ids/classes, comments for complex paths), and optimization (reduced path points, proper use of transforms instead of absolute coordinates). Deduct 5 points if the code lacks organization; deduct 3 points if paths are unnecessarily complex; deduct 2 points if the code uses absolute positioning when transforms would be more efficient.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color palette with appropriate contrast 2) Proper composition and balance of elements 3) Consistent style throughout (not mixing different visual styles). Deduct 3 points for clashing colors or poor contrast; deduct 3 points for awkward composition; deduct 4 points for inconsistent stylistic approaches.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the visual storytelling effective?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the scene successfully communicates the narrative of 'drinking at a bar' through visual cues, character expression, environmental details, and composition. The scene should feel authentic and convey mood/atmosphere. Deduct 3 points if the activity is ambiguous; deduct 4 points if the emotional tone/atmosphere is missing; deduct 3 points if contextual details that would enhance the storytelling are absent.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/dynamic-svg-realtime-stock-chart-animate.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 177,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration.\n\nPlease help me implement the following requirements using SVG code. The requirement is to create: Create a dynamic SVG chart that displays real-time stock data, using the <animate> element to achieve smooth transitions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG chart structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG contains essential chart elements like axes, grid lines, labels, and viewBox attribute with appropriate dimensions. The SVG should provide a clear container for data visualization with proper coordinate system. Score 0 if the SVG structure is missing or broken, 5 if basic structure exists but with issues, 10 if implemented professionally with all necessary components.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the stock data visualization components complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the chart includes necessary stock data visualization elements such as candlestick/line/bar representations, volume indicators, price labels, and time axis. Deduct 3 points if any essential component is missing, deduct 5 points if the visualization doesn't reflect standard stock charting conventions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the <animate> element properly implemented for smooth transitions?",
-      "description": "Review how <animate> elements are used to create transitions between data states. Check for proper attributes (attributeName, from, to, dur, fill, etc.). Deduct 5 points if transitions are jerky or incomplete, deduct 3 points if easing functions are inappropriate for financial data visualization. Give 0 if animations are missing entirely. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there a real-time data update mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess if the code includes methods to fetch and update stock data in real-time (WebSocket/polling/SSE), and properly integrates this with the SVG visualization. Check if there's appropriate handling of data arrival and smooth incorporation into the chart. Deduct 5 points if updates cause visual disruptions, deduct 3 points if update frequency is inappropriate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing data points, extreme price movements, connection issues, etc.) and provide fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive tooltips showing detailed price information 2. Zoom/pan capabilities 3. Technical indicators overlay like moving averages). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple animation frameworks mixed) 2. Function modules unrelated to stock visualization (e.g., unnecessary decorative elements) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that obscure data clarity). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data processing/visualization/animation logic), code reusability, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if performance bottlenecks exist in animation handling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional financial visualization standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows professional financial charting principles: 1) Color scheme appropriate for financial data (distinguishing up/down movements, using appropriate contrast) 2) Clear visual hierarchy for different information types 3) Proper data-ink ratio without chart junk. Deduct 3 points for poor color choices that hinder data interpretation, 5 points for cluttered visuals, and 5 points for misleading visual representations of data. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and responsive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the animations and transitions enhance data understanding: 1) Transition durations appropriate for financial data context (200-400ms) 2) Animation smoothness at 60fps without jank 3) Visual continuity during data updates. Deduct 5 points for animations that distract from data interpretation, 3 points for performance issues during transitions, and 5 points for animations that cause data misrepresentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/dynamic-svg-traffic-map.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 102,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code, creating it with SVG code. The requirement is to create: Create a dynamic SVG map that displays traffic information.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG map structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code creates a well-structured SVG with appropriate viewBox, dimensions, and organization. Check for proper path elements for roads, grouping of related elements, and proper layering. Score 0 if no SVG structure exists, 5 if basic structure exists but with issues, and 10 if the SVG structure follows best practices with proper organization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the traffic information visualization implemented effectively?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements traffic visualization through color coding (e.g., green/yellow/red for traffic levels), animation effects for moving traffic, or other visual indicators. Check for proper legends or indicators that explain the visualization. Deduct 5 points if visualization is static only, and 3 points if the visual metaphors are confusing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is there a data binding mechanism for real-time updates?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes JavaScript functions that can update the SVG elements based on changing traffic data. Look for event listeners, data fetching mechanisms (like fetch API or WebSockets), and data-driven attribute updates. Deduct 5 points if updates require page refresh, and 3 points if the update mechanism has significant delay (>2 seconds). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the map include interactive elements for user engagement?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes interactive features such as zooming, panning, clicking on roads for details, hovering effects to show additional information, or filtering options for different traffic conditions. Give 10 points if multiple intuitive interactions are implemented, 5 points if only basic interactions exist, and 0 points if the map is entirely static.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing data, malformed data, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide fallbacks or error handling. Code with strong robustness should degrade gracefully when features are not supported or data is unavailable, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Weather overlay affecting traffic 2. Time-of-day visual changes 3. Heat maps for congestion patterns over time). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar visualization logic 2. Feature modules unrelated to traffic visualization (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Complex effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive filters or gradients that slow rendering). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of SVG generation, data processing, and interaction logic), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global variables are excessively used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation between presentation and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the map visual design follows cartographic principles: 1) Appropriate color scheme for map features and traffic indicators 2) Proper visual hierarchy with main roads more prominent than minor ones 3) Clear and legible labels with appropriate font choices. Deduct 3 points for poor contrast between map elements, 5 points for indistinguishable traffic indicators, and 5 points for cluttered or overlapping labels. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG animations and transitions are performance-optimized and visually pleasing: 1) Smooth traffic flow animations without jank 2) Responsive interaction feedback within 100ms 3) Efficient update rendering without freezing the UI. Deduct 5 points for animations that cause performance issues, 3 points for delayed visual updates after data changes, and 5 points for jerky or inconsistent animation timing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/earphones-with-cord-svg-image.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 178,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for display. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a pair of earphones with a cord attached to them.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic structure of the earphones with cord accurately depicted?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code correctly represents the essential components of earphones: two earbuds, a connecting band or wire between them, and a cord extending from them. Score 0 if any of these components are missing, 5 if they're present but proportions are off, and 10 if the entire structure accurately resembles standard earphones.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the implementation of the earbuds detailed and realistic?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG code includes proper detailing of the earbuds (outer casing, cushions if applicable, speaker mesh indication). Deduct 3 points if the earbuds lack dimension (appear completely flat), 4 points if essential details are missing, and 5 points if they don't resemble real earbuds. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the earphone cord have natural curves and tension?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the cord is implemented with natural-looking curves using Bezier paths or similar techniques rather than straight lines. The cord should appear to have realistic tension and gravity effects. Score 0 for straight lines, 5 for basic curves, and 10 for realistic curves with proper tension visualization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the SVG path commands used efficiently and appropriately?",
-      "description": "Analyze whether the SVG implementation uses the most appropriate path commands (M, L, C, Q, A) for different parts of the earphones. Deduct 3 points for unnecessarily complex paths, 3 points for inefficient use of commands (e.g., using multiple line segments where curves would be better), and 4 points for not utilizing appropriate SVG elements for different components.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code is well-structured, uses appropriate viewBox dimensions, includes proper namespace declarations, and avoids hardcoded absolute positions where relative positioning would be better. Code with strong robustness should handle different display sizes properly, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if the SVG breaks on different screen sizes, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Animation of the cord swinging 2. Interactive elements like volume control or button clicks 3. Gradient or texture effects for realism). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant path segments that could be simplified 2. Unnecessary graphical elements unrelated to earphones 3. Overly complex effects that add little visual value but increase code complexity. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the redundant code significantly increases file size or performance issues.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review the code structure (clear grouping of elements using <g> tags, meaningful IDs/classes), use of reusable components, and optimization techniques (avoiding unnecessarily precise decimal values). Deduct 5 points if there's no logical grouping of elements; deduct 5 points if identical elements are duplicated instead of being reused; deduct 5 points if the file size is unnecessarily large due to poor optimization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Appropriate level of detail for the medium 2) Balanced proportions between earbuds and cord 3) Professional use of colors, shadows, or highlights to convey depth. Deduct 3 points for anatomically incorrect proportions, 5 points for unrealistic or jarring color choices, and 5 points for overly simplistic rendering that lacks visual interest. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is there any dynamic interaction or animation that enhances the visual?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any animations or interactions (if included) enhance the visual representation: 1) Smooth animation timing functions for natural movement 2) Appropriate trigger events for interactions 3) Subtle effects that don't dominate the core visual. Deduct 5 points for jarring or unrealistic animations, 3 points for animations that run too quickly/slowly, and 5 points for interactive elements without proper visual feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/earth-seven-continents-south-america.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 100,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please utilize your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable for display. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The earth has seven continents, including South America, which is part of the Americas.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG element is properly set up with appropriate viewBox, width, height attributes. Verify that namespaces are correctly declared. Score 0 if SVG is not implemented at all, 5 if basic structure exists but with errors, 10 if properly set up with correct dimensions and namespaces.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the Earth representation accurate and complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether all seven continents (Asia, Africa, North America, South America, Antarctica, Europe, and Australia) are properly represented on the SVG map. Check continent shapes for reasonable accuracy. Deduct 2 points for each missing continent. Deduct 3 points if South America is not clearly defined as part of the Americas. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the continent coloring and distinction clear?",
-      "description": "Review whether each continent has appropriate fill colors/patterns that make them distinguishable from each other and from oceans. Check if South America has a distinct visual representation while still maintaining a visual relationship with North America. Score 0 if continents are not visually distinct, 5 if basic differentiation exists, 10 if professional color schemes are applied with good contrast.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are proper map projections or geographic representations used?",
-      "description": "Assess whether an appropriate map projection is used (e.g., Mercator, Robinson, equirectangular). Check if the projection handles distortion reasonably and maintains recognizable continent shapes. Deduct 5 points for severe distortions that make continents unrecognizable, 3 points for inappropriate projection choice. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code is well-structured, uses proper nesting, and follows best practices (e.g., grouping related elements with <g> tags, using proper path commands). Check if the SVG handles different viewport sizes properly. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle browser variations, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if it breaks easily in different contexts, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Interactive hover effects for continent information 2. Smooth animations for rotation/zoom 3. Gradient or texture fills that add depth). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Excessive path points that could be simplified 2. Unnecessary graphical elements unrelated to the Earth representation 3. Over-complicated effects that increase file size without adding value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core representation is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (such as separating continent definitions, styling, and any interactive components), code comments, and optimization for file size. Deduct 5 points if global attributes are inconsistently applied; deduct 5 points if there's significant duplicated path data or styling; deduct 5 points if the SVG is not optimized for rendering performance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern visualization principles: 1) Harmonious color matching for continents and oceans (no more than 3-4 primary colors) 2) Clean visual hierarchy with appropriate stroke weights and fills 3) Professional presentation of labels or legends if included. Deduct 3 points for each cluttered visual element, 5 points for jarring color combinations, and 5 points for poor visual balance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless (if applicable)?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any interactive elements (if implemented) conform to user expectations: 1) Responsive hover/click states ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between states 3) Intuitive interaction patterns. For static SVGs without interaction, evaluate whether the code structure would easily support adding interactions later. Deduct 5 points for each broken interaction, 3 points for laggy animations, and 5 points for confusing interaction patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/green-clover-heart-shaped-plant-svg.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 27,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for display whenever possible. Please help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: Create a green clover, which is a heart-shaped plant found in nature.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core clover shape accurately implemented with SVG?",
-      "description": "Check if the code properly creates a four-leaf clover using SVG path elements or shape combinations. The clover should have four distinct heart-shaped leaves arranged symmetrically. Deduct 5 points if the leaves don't resemble hearts, 5 points if the arrangement isn't symmetrical, and 10 points if fewer than four leaves are implemented. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the green coloration appropriate and natural?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the clover uses appropriate green tones (like #00AA00, #228B22, or #008000) that look natural. Check if there's color variation or gradient to create depth. Deduct 3 points for unnatural green shades, 5 points for flat single-color implementation without depth, and 3 points if no different shades are used for different parts (leaves vs. stem). Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are additional botanical details included?",
-      "description": "Check for realistic botanical elements like a stem, veins on the leaves, or subtle textures. Deduct 3 points if the stem is missing, 3 points if leaf veins are absent, and 4 points if there's no texture or detail work to make the clover look natural. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code optimized and efficient?",
-      "description": "Review if the SVG implementation uses appropriate elements (paths, circles, etc.) efficiently. Check if the code uses groups (<g>) for related elements and proper coordinate systems. Deduct 3 points for excessive use of elements when fewer would suffice, 4 points for not using groups for logical organization, and 3 points for inefficient path commands. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different display contexts (browser compatibility, scaling) and includes appropriate viewBox settings. Deduct 5 points if viewBox attribute is missing or improperly configured, 3 points if transforms aren't used appropriately for positioning, and 2 points if there are no fallbacks for older browsers. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation like gentle swaying 2. Interactive elements like hover effects 3. Shadow or lighting effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary SVG elements that don't contribute to the design 2. Overly complex paths that could be simplified 3. Excessive effects that distract from the core clover representation. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core representation is obscured by unnecessary elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization, use of appropriate SVG attributes, and implementation of reusable components (if applicable). Deduct 5 points if SVG attributes are inconsistently applied or missing key parameters; deduct 3 points if similar elements aren't defined once and reused; deduct 2 points if the code lacks comments or clear structure. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual output meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the clover looks professional and polished: 1) Proportional leaf sizes and arrangement 2) Smooth curves without jagged edges 3) Proper use of visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for disproportionate elements, 4 points for visibly rough or uneven edges, and 3 points for poor visual balance. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Are interactive or dynamic elements well-implemented?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any animations or interactive features enhance the visual representation: 1) Smooth animations with appropriate timing 2) Purposeful interactions that add value 3) Elegant transitions. Deduct 3 points for animations that feel unnatural, 4 points for interactions without visual feedback, and 3 points for animations that hinder rather than enhance the representation. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/groom-wearing-tailcoat-svg-code.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 149,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable whenever possible. Please help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: create a groom wearing a tailcoat.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the groom's basic body structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG code correctly implements the groom's basic anatomical structure including head, torso, arms, and legs with proper proportions. The head should be approximately 1/8 of the total body height, shoulders should be 2-3 head widths, and the overall figure should follow human proportional guidelines. Score 0 if basic body structure is missing, 5 if proportions are noticeably incorrect, and 10 if anatomically accurate with proper scaling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the tailcoat design professionally rendered with authentic details?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the tailcoat includes essential formal elements: peaked lapels, double-breasted or single-breasted front, proper tail length extending to behind the knees, fitted waist, and appropriate button placement. Check for formal accessories like bow tie, white dress shirt, and formal trousers. Deduct 5 points if the tailcoat lacks authentic cut details, 3 points if formal accessories are missing, and 2 points if the tail proportions are incorrect. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG structure semantically organized and properly layered?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG uses appropriate grouping with <g> elements, logical layer ordering (background to foreground), and semantic naming conventions. The code should separate different clothing elements (shirt, jacket, trousers) into distinct groups. Deduct 5 points if no grouping structure is used, 3 points if layer ordering causes visual conflicts, and 2 points if element naming is unclear. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the SVG paths and shapes geometrically precise and optimized?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG uses appropriate primitive shapes (rect, circle, ellipse) where suitable and complex paths only when necessary. Check for smooth curves using proper Bézier controls, minimal path points, and accurate coordinate positioning. Deduct 5 points if paths are unnecessarily complex, 3 points if curves appear jagged, and 2 points if coordinates are not optimized. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code can handle common rendering issues across different browsers and screen sizes. The code should include proper viewBox settings, relative scaling, and fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should handle edge cases like extreme viewport sizes and maintain visual integrity. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if moderately robust, and 0 points if no robustness considerations are present.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG includes engaging visual enhancements (e.g., 1. Subtle gradient shading for depth 2. Interactive hover effects 3. Detailed fabric textures 4. Realistic shadow effects). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate path definitions for similar shapes 2. Unnecessary decorative elements unrelated to the groom figure 3. Overly complex effects that don't enhance the core design. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundant code significantly impacts file size or rendering performance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG code organization, reusable definitions using <defs>, proper use of symbols and patterns, and clean formatting. Deduct 5 points if code is poorly formatted or lacks structure; deduct 5 points if reusable elements aren't properly defined; deduct 5 points if the code is not optimized for file size. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional illustration standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows professional illustration principles: 1) Consistent color palette appropriate for formal wear (blacks, whites, grays with accent colors) 2) Proper contrast ratios for visibility 3) Harmonious proportions and balanced composition. Deduct 3 points for each jarring color choice, 5 points for poor contrast making details hard to see, and 5 points for unbalanced composition. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the visual presentation polished and attention to detail evident?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the illustration demonstrates professional attention to detail: 1) Clean, precise lines with consistent stroke weights 2) Proper shading and highlights for dimensional appearance 3) Fine details like buttons, seams, and fabric folds clearly rendered. Deduct 5 points for inconsistent line weights, 3 points for lack of dimensional shading, and 5 points for missing or poorly executed detail work. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}