@getollie/cli 0.0.5 → 0.2.1

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/implement-svg-map-pin-nepal-flag.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 171,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code whenever possible.\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code. This is a vector illustration of a map pin icon featuring the flag of Nepal.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic map pin SVG structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code properly defines an SVG container with appropriate viewBox and dimensions. The map pin should have a recognizable pin shape with a rounded top and pointed bottom. Deduct 5 points if the basic pin silhouette is incorrect, 3 points if the proportions are distorted, and 2 points if the SVG attributes are incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the flag of Nepal accurately represented within the pin?",
-      "description": "Verify that the Nepal flag's unique non-rectangular shape (double pennant) is correctly implemented with the proper blue border and crimson background. The flag should include the sun and crescent moon symbols. Deduct 5 points if the flag shape is incorrect, 3 points if the symbols are missing or malformed, and 2 points if the colors don't match official specifications (crimson: #DC143C, blue: #003893). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the celestial elements of Nepal's flag correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine if the sun (12-pointed) and crescent moon symbols are accurately drawn using SVG path elements or appropriate geometric shapes. The proportions and placement should match official specifications. Deduct 5 points if the symbols are significantly distorted, 3 points for minor inaccuracies in ray count or shape, and 2 points for incorrect positioning. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the integration of the flag within the pin visually appropriate?",
-      "description": "Assess if the Nepal flag is properly positioned and scaled within the pin shape, respecting the flag's unique proportions while maintaining visual harmony. Deduct 5 points if the flag appears stretched or distorted, 3 points if it's poorly positioned, and 2 points if the integration lacks visual clarity. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different display contexts (browser rendering, scaling, etc.) and includes appropriate fallbacks. Check for proper namespacing in SVG to avoid conflicts. Deduct 5 points if the SVG doesn't scale properly, 3 points if there's no fallback for older browsers, and 2 points if the code lacks comments for complex paths. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Hover/click animations 2. Responsive design adaptations 3. Gradient effects or shadows for depth). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary nested group elements 2. Redundant path definitions that could be optimized 3. Excessive filters or effects that impact performance without adding value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual elements are obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as using groups for logical sections), path optimization (minimized path commands), and SVG attribute best practices. Deduct 5 points if IDs/classes aren't used for potential CSS/JS manipulation; deduct 5 points if paths aren't optimized; deduct 5 points if the SVG isn't properly structured for accessibility. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Accurate color reproduction of Nepal's flag 2) Clean lines with appropriate stroke widths 3) Professional proportions that maintain integrity at different sizes. Deduct 3 points for jagged edges or poor anti-aliasing, 5 points for inaccurate colors, and 5 points for disproportionate elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG optimized for performance and compatibility?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG is optimized for web use: 1) Minimal path points without losing quality 2) Appropriate use of transforms over redundant path definitions 3) Compatibility with major browsers. Deduct 5 points for bloated paths with unnecessary points, 3 points for lack of minification capabilities, and 5 points for techniques that aren't widely supported. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Icons/Logos",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/implement-svg-microsoft-edge-logo.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 98,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes.\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code: the Microsoft Edge logo.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure of the Microsoft Edge logo correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG element has appropriate viewport dimensions, viewBox attribute, and proper namespace declarations. Verify that the basic structural elements needed for the Edge logo (the circular wave/swirl shape) are present. Score 0 if the SVG structure is missing or fundamentally incorrect, 5 if basic structure exists but with significant errors, and 10 if properly implemented with correct attributes and structure.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the logo accurately represent Microsoft Edge's current visual identity?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the logo matches the current Microsoft Edge logo design (blue-green gradient circular wave). Compare the shape accuracy against the official logo. Check for proper curvature of the wave elements. Deduct 3 points for minor shape inaccuracies, 5 points for significant shape distortions, and 7 points if the logo resembles an outdated version. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the correct color gradients implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify if the logo uses the official Microsoft Edge color scheme with proper gradients (transitioning from blue to teal/cyan). Check if the SVG implements proper <linearGradient> or <radialGradient> elements with correct color stops. Score 0 if solid colors are used instead of gradients, 5 if gradients are implemented but with incorrect colors, and 10 if both gradient type and colors accurately match the official logo.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the code optimized for SVG rendering?",
-      "description": "Examine if the SVG uses the most appropriate elements (paths, circles, etc.) for each part of the logo. Check for optimization techniques like path simplification, appropriate precision in coordinates (not excessive decimal places), and minimal use of redundant elements. Score 10 if fully optimized, 5 if partially optimized with some inefficiencies, and 3 if clearly unoptimized with redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, scaling problems, or viewBox rendering errors). Code with strong robustness should include fallback options or handle edge cases. Give 10 points for implementation with cross-browser compatibility considerations and proper error handling, 5 points for average robustness, and 0 points if obvious compatibility issues exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. Subtle animations when hovering 2. Responsive scaling based on container size 3. Interactive elements within the logo). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or attributes that don't contribute to the final rendering 2. Unnecessary nested groups or transforms that complicate the structure 3. Excessive styling that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual elements are obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as logical grouping of SVG elements), meaningful naming of IDs and classes, and proper comments for complex path data or calculations. Deduct 5 points if elements lack descriptive IDs or classes; deduct 5 points if the code structure is chaotic with no logical grouping; deduct 5 points if there are no comments explaining complex path data. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the SVG rendering meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG output follows professional design principles: 1) Crisp edges without pixelation at various zoom levels 2) Proper proportions matching the official logo 3) Correct alignment of all elements. Deduct 3 points for each visual artifact or rendering issue, 5 points for noticeable proportional errors, and 5 points for misalignment of key elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG properly scalable without quality loss?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG properly scales across different display sizes and resolutions: 1) Maintains crisp edges when scaled up 2) Preserves all details when scaled down 3) Responds appropriately to container constraints. Deduct 5 points if the logo blurs or pixelates at larger sizes, 3 points if small details are lost at smaller sizes, and 5 points if the aspect ratio distorts during scaling. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Icons/Logos",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/implement-svg-wheelchair-accessible-icon.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 200,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration whenever possible. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The wheelchair is accessible for the handicapped person.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the wheelchair SVG fully implemented with proper structure?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code correctly implements a recognizable wheelchair symbol with appropriate elements (circles for wheels, lines/paths for the frame). Score 0 if the wheelchair is not implemented, 5 if it's basic but recognizable, and 10 if it includes detailed elements (wheel spokes, armrests, proper proportions) that make it highly identifiable.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the SVG use appropriate accessibility attributes?",
-      "description": "Check if accessibility attributes are implemented (role=\"img\", aria-label, title, desc elements). The SVG should be properly labeled as an accessibility symbol. Deduct 3 points if role attributes are missing, 3 points if descriptive elements are absent, and 4 points if screen reader compatibility is not considered. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG properly scalable and responsive?",
-      "description": "Verify if the SVG uses proper viewBox attributes and relative units (percentages, em) rather than fixed pixel dimensions. The wheelchair symbol should scale appropriately across different screen sizes without distortion. Deduct 5 points if fixed dimensions are used and 5 points if the image loses clarity when scaled. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the SVG follow international standards for accessibility symbols?",
-      "description": "Assess if the wheelchair symbol conforms to recognized international accessibility standards (ISO 7001, ISA symbol). Check for correct proportions, colors (if specified), and recognizability. Deduct 10 points if the symbol doesn't adhere to recognized standards. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle different browser environments and includes fallback mechanisms (like PNG fallback for older browsers). Check for cross-browser compatibility and graceful degradation. Code with strong robustness should be able to display in all major browsers, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no cross-browser considerations are made, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animations when focused 2. Color theme adaptability for light/dark modes 3. Interactive elements that respond to user actions). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate path definitions or elements 2. Unnecessary attributes that don't contribute to the appearance or function 3. Overly complex implementations that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functionality is obscured by unnecessary code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (proper grouping of SVG elements), naming conventions for IDs/classes, and maintainable structure. Deduct 5 points if elements aren't properly grouped; deduct 5 points if naming is inconsistent or unclear; deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments for complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern design principles: 1) Clean lines and balanced proportions 2) Appropriate contrast for visibility 3) Professional appearance suitable for public signage. Deduct 3 points for each visual imbalance, 5 points for poor contrast that affects visibility, and 5 points for unprofessional appearance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is any dynamic interaction smooth and purposeful?",
-      "description": "If animations or interactions are included, judge whether they follow accessibility best practices: 1) Respects user preferences for reduced motion 2) Enhances rather than distracts from the symbol's purpose 3) Properly implemented with both CSS and SMIL methods for backward compatibility. Deduct 3 points for animations that can't be disabled, 4 points for distracting effects, and 3 points for poor animation performance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Icons/Logos",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/svg-binoculars-browsing-searching-magnifying.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 87,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration. \n\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code: Create an SVG that depicts binoculars for browsing, searching, and magnifying.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG binoculars structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly implements the binoculars structure using SVG elements, including dual circular lenses, central bridge connection, eyepieces, and adjustment mechanism. Score 0 if basic binoculars shape is not recognizable, 5 if only basic circular lenses are implemented, and 10 if complete binoculars structure with all components (lenses, bridge, eyepieces, focusing ring details) is fully rendered.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the browsing, searching, and magnifying functionalities implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes interactive browsing (pan/drag), search functionality (target highlighting/scanning animation), and magnification effects (zoom in/out with visual feedback). Deduct 5 points if magnification lacks smooth transition, 3 points if search function has no visual indicators. Two-way interaction between user input and visual response is required. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the SVG optimization and scalability properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG uses efficient path optimization, proper viewBox configuration, and responsive scaling. Check if vector graphics maintain crisp edges at different zoom levels and use appropriate coordinate systems. Deduct 5 points if pixelation occurs during scaling, 3 points if SVG file size exceeds 50KB without justification. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete interaction lifecycle and state management constructed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes complete interaction states such as idle/active/searching/magnifying modes, with proper state transitions and visual feedback. Deduct 5 points if state management is not implemented, 3 points if transition animations are missing or abrupt. Give 10 points if full lifecycle with smooth state transitions is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid SVG parameters, browser compatibility issues, touch/mouse event conflicts, etc.) and provide graceful degradation or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases and cross-browser compatibility, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Realistic lens reflection effects 2. Dynamic focus adjustment with blur effects 3. Multi-target search with breadcrumb trails 4. Gesture-based controls). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements or duplicate paths 2. Unnecessary JavaScript libraries for simple interactions 3. Over-complex animations that don't serve the core functionality. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core binoculars functionality is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (separation of SVG structure, styling, and interaction logic), proper use of CSS classes vs inline styles, and clean JavaScript architecture. Deduct 5 points if inline styles dominate over CSS classes; deduct 5 points if JavaScript lacks proper event handling or uses deprecated methods; deduct 5 points if SVG structure is not semantic or accessible. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the binoculars design follows realistic proportions and professional aesthetics: 1) Accurate lens-to-body ratio (typically 1:1.2) 2) Consistent color scheme with realistic metallic/plastic textures 3) Proper shadow and highlight placement for 3D effect. Deduct 3 points for each unrealistic proportion, 5 points for inconsistent lighting/shadow direction, and 5 points for color choices that don't reflect real binoculars materials. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive effects conform to natural binoculars usage: 1) Smooth magnification transitions (300-500ms duration) 2) Realistic focus adjustment with appropriate easing 3) Intuitive gesture mapping (pinch-to-zoom, drag-to-pan). Deduct 5 points for each jarring animation, 3 points for unnatural interaction patterns, and 5 points for poor touch/mouse event handling. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Icons/Logos",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/svg-download-files-folder-computer-arrow-circle.json

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "label": "create a visual representation of downloading files from a folder on a computer by clicking on an arrow within a circle",
-  "svg": "<svg width=\"24\" height=\"24\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"2\" stroke-linecap=\"round\" stroke-linejoin=\"round\"><path d=\"M4 17v2a2 2 0 0 0 2 2h12a2 2 0 0 0 2-2v-2\"/><polyline points=\"7 11 12 16 17 11\"/><line x1=\"12\" y1=\"16\" x2=\"12\" y2=\"4\"/></svg>"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/svg-nintendo-controller-video-game-icons.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 197,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration.\nPlease help me implement the following requirement using SVG code: create a Nintendo controller and icons playing video games, for a minimal entertainment activity.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Nintendo controller structure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG code accurately recreates the Nintendo controller's iconic structure through proper geometric shapes and proportions. Check if it includes essential elements like D-pad, action buttons (A/B), shoulder buttons, analog sticks, and the characteristic controller body shape. Score 0 if only basic rectangles are used, 5 if controller outline is recognizable but lacks detail, and 10 if all controller components are accurately proportioned and positioned according to authentic Nintendo controller design.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the gaming icons and visual elements professionally designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the gaming icons (characters, items, UI elements) are implemented with clean SVG paths and demonstrate gaming aesthetics. Check for proper use of vector graphics principles, scalable design, and gaming-themed iconography. Icons should be instantly recognizable and maintain visual consistency. Deduct 5 points if icons are poorly vectorized or pixelated, deduct 3 points if gaming theme is not clearly conveyed. Full score requires professional-grade gaming iconography.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the minimal entertainment activity concept effectively realized?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the implementation successfully creates an engaging minimal entertainment experience through interactive elements or visual storytelling. Check if the controller and icons work together to suggest or enable actual gaming interaction. The design should communicate 'playfulness' and 'entertainment' immediately. Deduct 5 points if no interactive elements are present, deduct 3 points if the entertainment aspect is unclear or confusing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG structure optimized and semantically correct?",
-      "description": "Review the SVG code structure for proper use of groups, layers, and semantic organization. Check if the code uses appropriate SVG elements (rect, circle, path, polygon) efficiently and includes proper viewBox settings for scalability. Evaluate whether the code is clean, readable, and follows SVG best practices. Deduct 5 points if excessive nested groups are used, deduct 3 points if viewBox is incorrectly set, deduct 5 points if inline styles are used instead of proper SVG attributes.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, scaling problems, rendering errors) and provide fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should work consistently across different browsers and screen sizes, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no compatibility considerations are made, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Hover animations on controller buttons 2. CSS keyframe animations for gaming effects 3. Interactive SVG elements that respond to clicks 4. Creative use of SVG filters or gradients). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements that serve no visual purpose 2. Overly complex paths that could be simplified 3. Unnecessary styling that doesn't contribute to the gaming theme. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual concept is obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review SVG code organization, proper use of comments, consistent naming conventions, and maintainable structure. Deduct 5 points if SVG elements are not properly organized or grouped; deduct 5 points if the code lacks readability or uses inconsistent formatting; deduct 5 points if no consideration is given to file size optimization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching that reflects Nintendo's brand aesthetics 2) Proper proportions and spacing that maintain visual balance 3) Professional use of typography if text elements are included 4) Clean, minimalist approach suitable for entertainment context. Deduct 3 points for each visually jarring element, 5 points for poor color harmony, and 5 points for unbalanced composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any interactive elements or animations conform to user experience principles: 1) Smooth CSS transitions if hover effects are implemented 2) Appropriate animation timing and easing 3) Clear visual feedback for interactive elements 4) Intuitive visual hierarchy that guides user attention. Deduct 5 points for each missing interaction feedback, 3 points for choppy animations, and 5 points for confusing visual flow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/svg-red-white-bmc-logo.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 182,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable. Please help me implement this SVG image using code: a close up of a red and white BMC logo.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG code for the BMC logo accurate and working?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG code properly renders the BMC (Bicycle Manufacturing Company) logo with its distinctive red and white color scheme. The logo should be recognizable as the BMC brand mark with accurate proportions and shapes. Score 0 if the logo is unrecognizable, 5 if it's recognizable but with significant distortions, and 10 if it closely resembles the official BMC logo.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the red and white color scheme correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify that the code uses the correct red color (#E30613 or similar) for the BMC logo and implements a proper contrast with white elements. Check if the colors match BMC's brand identity. Deduct 5 points if wrong shades are used, 3 points if the contrast is poor, and 10 points if colors don't match the BMC brand at all. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the SVG implementation use proper vector paths?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the SVG uses proper path elements (<path>) with optimized d-attribute values or appropriate basic shapes (<rect>, <circle>, etc.) instead of bitmap approaches. Ensure the paths are constructed efficiently without unnecessary points. Deduct 5 points for unnecessarily complex paths, 3 points for unoptimized curves, and give 0 points if bitmap approaches are used instead of vectors. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the close-up view appropriately implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code implements a proper close-up view of the logo, focusing on details while maintaining clarity and proportions. The viewBox attribute should be set correctly to frame the close-up area. Deduct 5 points if the viewBox is improperly set, 3 points if the close-up effect is poorly executed, and 10 points if no close-up effect is implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles potential display issues across browsers and devices, includes fallback options, and properly sets width/height or preserveAspectRatio attributes. Code with strong robustness should work consistently across platforms, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average with minor display inconsistencies, give 5 points, and if serious rendering problems exist, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the logo visualization (e.g., 1. Subtle animations when hovering 2. Responsive scaling techniques 3. Interactive elements that highlight parts of the logo). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary elements or groups that complicate the SVG structure 2. Decorative elements not part of the original BMC logo 3. Excessive filters or effects that increase rendering load without benefit. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundant code interferes with the core logo rendering.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modularity (such as proper grouping with <g> elements), element naming (with meaningful id/class attributes), and optimization for file size. Deduct 5 points if there's no logical structure to the SVG elements; deduct 5 points if the code is excessively verbose or poorly formatted; deduct 5 points if there are no comments for complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual implementation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG adheres to professional design principles: 1) Precise alignment of elements 2) Clean edges without artifacts 3) Proper scaling at different sizes without distortion. Deduct 3 points for each misaligned element, 5 points for jagged edges or rendering artifacts, and 5 points for improper scaling behavior. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG accessible and optimized for different contexts?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG implementation includes: 1) Proper ARIA attributes for accessibility 2) Title and description elements 3) Optimization for both light and dark backgrounds. Deduct 5 points for missing accessibility features, 3 points for poor background adaptation, and 5 points if the SVG doesn't include proper metadata. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Icons/Logos",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_icons_logos/woman-business-suit-speech-bubble-icon.json

@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "svg": "<svg width=\"24\" height=\"24\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\" xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/2000/svg\">\n  <path d=\"M12 2C6.477 2 2 6.477 2 12C2 17.523 6.477 22 12 22C17.523 22 22 17.523 22 12C22 6.477 17.523 2 12 2ZM12 4C16.411 4 20 7.589 20 12C20 16.411 16.411 20 12 20C7.589 20 4 16.411 4 12C4 7.589 7.589 4 12 4Z\" fill=\"currentColor\"/>\n  <path d=\"M12 12C14.2091 12 16 10.2091 16 8C16 5.79086 14.2091 4 12 4C9.79086 4 8 5.79086 8 8C8 10.2091 9.79086 12 12 12ZM12 6C13.1046 6 14 6.89543 14 8C14 9.10457 13.1046 10 12 10C10.8954 10 10 9.10457 10 8C10 6.89543 10.8954 6 12 6Z\" fill=\"currentColor\"/>\n  <path d=\"M12 13C9.33333 13 7 14.3333 7 17V20H17V17C17 14.3333 14.6667 13 12 13Z\" fill=\"currentColor\"/>\n  <path d=\"M18 10C18 9.44772 17.5523 9 17 9H15.5L14.5 7.5L12 10H10C9.44772 10 9 10.4477 9 11C9 11.5523 9.44772 12 10 12H11.5L12.5 13.5L15 11H17C17.5523 11 18 10.5523 18 10Z\" fill=\"currentColor\"/>\n</svg>\n",
-  "description": "An icon depicting a woman in a business suit with a speech bubble above her head."
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/3d-cube-dynamic-shadow-effects-svg-rect-animatetransform.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 176,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration purposes. \nPlease help me implement the following requirement using code, specifically using SVG code. The requirement is to create: Design a 3D cube with dynamic shadow effects, using <rect> and <animateTransform> elements.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "3D cube implementation completeness",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code properly implements all six faces of a 3D cube using <rect> elements with appropriate positioning, dimensions, and perspective. Check if the faces are correctly positioned to create a convincing 3D effect. Score 0 if fewer than 4 faces are implemented, 5 if all faces are present but with incorrect perspective, and 10 for a complete and accurate 3D representation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Dynamic shadow effect implementation",
-      "description": "Assess the shadow implementation quality and realism. The shadow should change dynamically as the cube rotates, with proper opacity, blur effects (using <feGaussianBlur>), and accurate positioning relative to the light source. Deduct 5 points if the shadow is static, 3 points if shadow direction doesn't match the light source, and 2 points if shadow intensity doesn't vary with distance/angle. Full score requires physically accurate shadow projection.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Animation quality using <animateTransform>",
-      "description": "Evaluate the animation implementation using <animateTransform> elements. Check for smooth rotation on multiple axes, proper timing functions (ease-in-out), and appropriate animation duration. Deduct 3 points for single-axis rotation only, 3 points for abrupt/jerky animations, and 4 points if animation doesn't loop properly or has noticeable jumps between cycles. The full score requires multi-axis, smooth, continuous animation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Proper transformation and perspective handling",
-      "description": "Assess how well the SVG handles 3D transformations and perspective. Check for proper use of transform attributes (rotate, translate), perspective settings, and maintaining correct face visibility during rotation. Deduct 5 points if perspective distortion is unrealistic, 3 points if transformations aren't properly synchronized across elements, and 2 points for improper z-index management during rotation. Full score requires mathematically correct 3D transformations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Code robustness",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle various viewport sizes, browser compatibility, and performance under different conditions. Code with strong robustness should use relative units, include fallbacks for unsupported features, and maintain performance with minimal CPU usage. Deduct 3 points for fixed pixel dimensions, 4 points for browser-specific implementations without fallbacks, and 3 points for inefficient code that causes performance issues. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Innovative features",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the visualization (e.g., 1. User-controlled rotation via mouse/touch interaction 2. Light source position adjustment 3. Texture mapping on cube faces 4. Responsive design that adapts to container size). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Redundant features and code efficiency",
-      "description": "Strictly check for: 1. Redundant elements that serve the same purpose 2. Unnecessary filters or effects that impact performance 3. Excessive attributes that could be consolidated in CSS 4. Animations that compete with or cancel each other out. Deduct 2.5 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functionality is compromised by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Engineering quality",
-      "description": "Review the code structure, commenting, organization, and best practices. Evaluate use of groups (<g>), proper naming conventions, reusable components, and optimization techniques. Deduct 3 points for ungrouped elements, 3 points for missing or misleading comments on complex transformations, 2 points for duplicated code patterns, and 2 points for not using CSS for styling where appropriate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Visual design quality",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the cube design follows professional standards: 1) Harmonious color scheme for the cube faces 2) Appropriate contrast between faces to enhance 3D effect 3) Balanced proportions and dimensions 4) Professional finish with subtle details. Deduct 2.5 points for clashing colors, 2.5 points for poor contrast making faces indistinguishable, 2.5 points for disproportionate dimensions, and 2.5 points for lack of finishing details. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Animation smoothness and performance",
-      "description": "Judge whether the animations conform to natural movement: 1) Consistent frame rate without jitter 2) Appropriate animation timing (not too fast/slow) 3) Smooth transitions between animation states 4) Efficient implementation that doesn't cause browser lag. Deduct 2.5 points for each issue: jerky animations, inappropriate timing, abrupt transitions, or poor performance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/angry-bulldog-face-black-white-illustration.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 186,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code whenever possible.\n\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code. A black and white illustration of an angry bulldog's face, showcasing distinct facial features and expressions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the bulldog's face structure accurately depicted in SVG?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG path elements properly construct the distinct anatomy of a bulldog's face, including the wide jaw, wrinkled forehead, and flat nose. Check if the proportions are accurate (jaw width should be approximately 1.5x the width of the forehead). Score 0 if the basic structure is unrecognizable as a bulldog, 5 if the structure is recognizable but with anatomical inaccuracies, and 10 for anatomically correct representation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the angry expression effectively conveyed?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the SVG code successfully creates visual elements that convey anger, such as furrowed brows, bared teeth, flared nostrils, or intense eyes. Score based on the emotional impact: 0 points if the expression is neutral or unclear, 5 points if only basic anger cues are present, and 10 points if the expression unmistakably communicates aggression and intensity.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the black and white illustration properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review the color implementation in the SVG code. Check if the illustration effectively uses only black, white, and potentially grayscale values (no RGB colors outside grayscale). Assess contrast and balance in the monochrome design. Deduct 5 points if colors other than black/white/gray are used, and 3 points if the contrast is too low to clearly distinguish features. Full 10 points for masterful use of monochrome with proper shading techniques.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the facial details implemented with appropriate SVG techniques?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code uses appropriate SVG elements and techniques for rendering detailed facial features (wrinkles, teeth, eyes, etc.). Check for proper use of <path>, <circle>, <rect>, and other SVG elements. Deduct 5 points if inappropriate elements are used for specific features, and 3 points if features lack detail. Give 10 points if complex details are implemented efficiently with appropriate SVG techniques.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code is well-structured, uses viewBox appropriately, and handles potential rendering issues across browsers. Check if the SVG includes proper structuring with groups (<g>) for logical organization of elements. Deduct 5 points if missing viewport/viewBox definitions, 3 points if lacking proper element grouping, and 2 points if browser compatibility issues exist. Give 10 points for robust, standards-compliant implementation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the SVG includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation for breathing or growling effect 2. Interactive elements that respond to mouse hover/click 3. Creative use of filters or gradients while maintaining the black and white aesthetic). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate path definitions or redundant shapes for the same visual element 2. Unnecessary attributes that don't contribute to the visual output 3. Overly complex paths that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if redundancies significantly increase file size or render time.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as logical grouping of SVG elements), naming conventions for IDs/classes, and optimization for file size. Deduct 5 points if elements lack semantic IDs/classes; deduct 5 points if the SVG contains unoptimized paths (excessive decimal points, unnecessary commands); deduct 5 points if no comments explain complex sections. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the illustration meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows professional illustration principles: 1) Balanced composition with clear focal point 2) Effective use of negative space 3) Consistent line weights and style. Deduct 3 points for unbalanced composition, 5 points for inconsistent line weights, and 5 points for poor use of negative space. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG optimized for performance and scalability?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG is implemented efficiently: 1) Path optimization with minimal points 2) Appropriate use of primitives vs. paths 3) Scalability without quality loss at different sizes. Deduct 5 points for unnecessarily complex paths, 3 points for using paths where primitives would be more efficient, and 5 points if the image degrades significantly when scaled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}