@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-menu-ordering-mini-program.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1671,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure the generated code is executable. I want to create a WeChat mini program. I'm a complete beginner with no knowledge at all. Now I need a piece of code to help me implement these functions: this is a menu mini program where I can freely add or remove dishes. Each dish needs to have an image, name, and description. Since there are many dishes, a search bar is necessary, and dishes need to be categorized, such as meat, hot dishes, cold dishes, etc. Please ensure the interface looks nice, not just plain white. I need a powerful mini program, please design it like restaurant ordering mini programs.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the dish management system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements CRUD operations for dishes (Create, Read, Update, Delete). Check if each dish object contains the required properties (image, name, description, category) with proper validation. Score 0 if the core functionality is missing, 5 if only basic operations are implemented without validation, and 10 if full management with data validation is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the dish categorization system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a flexible category system that allows proper organization of dishes (meat, hot dishes, cold dishes, etc.). Check if categories can be dynamically added/edited/removed. Deduct 3 points if categories are hardcoded, deduct 5 points if dishes cannot be reassigned to different categories. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the search functionality effective and optimized?",
-      "description": "Check whether the search implementation allows filtering by dish name, description, and category with proper indexing. Verify if the search performs efficiently with debouncing (≤300ms delay). Deduct 3 points if search doesn't support partial matching, 5 points if it doesn't support multi-field search, and 3 points if there's no visual feedback during search. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the image handling properly implemented for dishes?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code handles image uploads, storage, compression, and display efficiently. Check if it implements lazy loading, proper caching strategies, and fallback images. Deduct 3 points if image size validation is missing, 3 points if no compression is implemented, and 5 points if there's no placeholder during loading. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruptions, invalid inputs, image loading failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Dish recommendation system 2. Seasonal menu highlights 3. Nutritional information display 4. Animated dish presentations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple search mechanisms coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to menu management (e.g., a built-in weather forecast) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/logic/UI layers), component reusability, and adherence to WeChat Mini Program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state management is missing or poorly implemented; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if custom components aren't properly encapsulated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional restaurant app standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern restaurant app design principles: 1) Appetizing color scheme suitable for food display 2) Proper visual hierarchy highlighting dishes 3) Professional typography system (dish names should stand out). Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 5 points for non-food-appropriate color schemes, and 5 points for poor image-to-content balance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and intuitive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactions follow WeChat Mini Program conventions: 1) Natural swipe gestures for browsing dishes 2) Smooth category switching without jarring transitions 3) Intuitive dish detail expansion animations. Deduct 5 points for each unresponsive interaction, 3 points for inconsistent navigation patterns, and 5 points for hard-to-discover key functions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-campus-second-hand-trading.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1209,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code whenever possible. Write a WeChat Mini Program using JavaScript for campus second-hand trading.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core functionality for second-hand trading fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements essential trading features: product listing, search functionality, transaction processing, and user authentication. Score 0 if core features are missing, 5 if only basic listing is implemented, and 10 if the complete transaction flow (listing, browsing, negotiation, payment mechanism) is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program structure properly constructed?",
-      "description": "Check if the code follows WeChat Mini Program architecture with app.js, app.json, app.wxss correctly configured, and proper page directory structure. Examine if lifecycle hooks are properly utilized (onLoad, onShow, etc.) and if global configuration is appropriately set. Deduct 5 points if core Mini Program components (like wx:for, wx:if) are missing or misused, and 3 points if page routing is improperly handled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is user authentication and profile management implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes WeChat login integration, user profile creation/editing, and proper session management using wx.login() and getUserProfile(). Check if university verification mechanism exists to ensure campus-only trading. Deduct 5 points if authentication is insecure, and 3 points if profile management is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are messaging and notification systems properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes real-time messaging between buyers and sellers, notification system for price updates or new messages, and transaction status updates. Check if message persistence is implemented. Deduct 5 points if real-time messaging is missing, and 3 points if notifications aren't implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, invalid input, image upload failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should implement error boundaries and precise error messages, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AR preview of products 2. Item condition verification system 3. Campus delivery integration 4. Price trend analytics). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple product listing methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to campus trading (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/view/API layers), component reusability, and consistent coding standards. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no error logging mechanism exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design principles: 1) Consistent with WeChat UI style 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows WeChat's guidelines) 3) Professional typography (following WeChat's font hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each UI component that breaks WeChat's design language, 5 points for cluttered layouts, and 5 points for poor information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Page transitions are smooth and consistent 2) Loading states are properly indicated 3) Form interactions provide immediate feedback. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-family-water-card.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1576,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. How to design a WeChat Mini Program: Design a \"Family Water Card\" feature that supports monthly top-ups and automatic delivery reminders.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat Mini Program structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes the necessary Mini Program files (app.js, app.json, app.wxss, pages structure) and follows the official WeChat development standards. Verify the proper implementation of the application lifecycle functions. Score 0 if the basic structure is incorrect, 5 if the structure is present but incomplete, and 10 if it follows all WeChat Mini Program best practices.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the monthly top-up feature fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code implements a complete top-up system with multiple payment options, transaction records, and receipt generation. Check for WeChat Payment API integration, balance calculation, and proper error handling during payment processes. Deduct 5 points if payment verification is missing, 3 points if receipt generation isn't implemented, and 2 points if transaction records aren't stored properly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the water delivery reminder system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes a comprehensive reminder system with customizable frequency settings, push notifications using the wx.requestSubscribeMessage API, and intelligent prediction of next delivery date based on usage patterns. Deduct 5 points if notifications aren't implemented correctly, 3 points if reminder scheduling is inflexible, and 2 points if there's no usage pattern analysis. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the family sharing functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the code allows for family member management, role-based permissions (admin vs. regular users), and shared access to the water card balance and history. Check if the solution handles multi-user synchronization and conflict resolution. Deduct 5 points if member management is missing, 3 points if permission controls aren't implemented, and 2 points if data synchronization issues aren't addressed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures, payment errors, permission denials, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Water usage statistics and visualization 2. Integration with home IoT water purifiers 3. Environmental impact calculation based on water consumption). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple notification systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to water card management (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating business logic/UI/network layers), component reusability, and consistent coding style. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if naming conventions are inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual language 2) Proper layout spacing and component sizing 3) Professional typography system. Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat standards, 5 points for inconsistent visual hierarchy, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 200-400ms 3) Clear visual feedback for all user actions. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations during transitions, and 5 points for confusing navigation patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-fast-food-ordering-system.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1641,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. Help me write a fast food ordering system based on WeChat Mini Program, similar to the style of \"Little Vegetable Garden.\" Please include the source code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core ordering flow implemented completely?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a complete ordering flow (browsing menu, adding to cart, checkout, payment). Check if it includes necessary features like item customization (e.g., spice level, size options), quantity adjustment, and order summary. Score 0 if the core ordering flow is missing, 5 if only basic item selection is implemented, and 10 if the complete flow with customization options is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the Mini Program structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code follows WeChat Mini Program architecture with proper page structure, app.json configuration, and utilizes Mini Program components (e.g., swiper, picker, navigator). Check for proper use of the lifecycle methods and page routing. Deduct 3 points if global configuration is incorrect, 4 points if native components are not used appropriately, and 5 points if the project structure doesn't follow Mini Program conventions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the user management and authentication system implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes WeChat authentication integration, user profile management, and authorization handling using wx.login() and open APIs. Verify proper storage of user session data and token management. Deduct 5 points if there's no login mechanism, 3 points if user authorization lacks error handling, and 3 points if user data persistence is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the payment integration properly implemented for the Mini Program?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes WeChat Payment API integration with proper order creation, signed package preparation, and payment result handling. Check for payment callback processing and order status updates. Deduct 5 points if the payment API integration is missing, 3 points if security measures for payment are inadequate, and 3 points if order synchronization after payment is incomplete. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, payment failures, API timeouts, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Food recommendation system based on order history 2. Real-time order preparation status 3. Loyalty points system with mini-games). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart manipulation methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to food ordering (e.g., excessive social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., complex animations that slow down the ordering process). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/UI/logic layers), component reusability, and proper use of MVVM pattern for Mini Program. Deduct 5 points if global state management is chaotic; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if custom components aren't properly encapsulated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards similar to 'Little Vegetable Garden'?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the UI design follows the fresh, simple style of 'Little Vegetable Garden' with: 1) A cohesive green and white color scheme with accent colors 2) Clean card-based layout with appropriate whitespace 3) Consistent typography and iconography. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent visual elements, 5 points for cluttered layouts, and 5 points for designs that don't match the referenced style. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and optimized for mobile touch?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactions are optimized for touch controls: 1) Touch targets are at least 44×44px 2) Swipe gestures for common actions like removing cart items 3) Proper feedback for all interactions within 100ms. Deduct 5 points for small, hard-to-tap elements; 3 points for missing visual feedback on interactions; and 5 points for jerky animations or transitions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-hotel-booking-page.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1146,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. We need a complete hotel booking functionality page for WeChat Mini Program, including the js, wxss, and wxml files.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the hotel booking core functionality implemented completely?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the core booking flow including hotel search, room selection, date picker, guest information form, and payment interface. Check if all required input validations are in place. Score 0 if the core booking flow is missing, 5 if only partial functionality is implemented, and 10 if the complete end-to-end booking process is implemented with proper state management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the WeChat Mini Program specific APIs utilized correctly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the usage of WeChat-specific APIs such as wx.request for data fetching, wx.navigateTo for navigation, wx.showToast for notifications, and wx.login for authentication. Verify integration with WeChat payment APIs if applicable. Deduct 3 points if essential WeChat APIs are not used, 5 points if they're used incorrectly, and 10 points if all necessary WeChat APIs are properly implemented and error-handled.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the MVVM architecture properly implemented with proper data binding?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code follows WeChat Mini Program's MVVM pattern with proper separation of view (wxml), styling (wxss), and logic (js). Verify that data binding, event handling, and conditional rendering are implemented correctly. Deduct 5 points if the separation is poor, 3 points if data binding is inconsistent, and give 10 points if the architecture is clean with proper data flow.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the required UI components for hotel booking implemented?",
-      "description": "Verify implementation of essential components: date picker with availability display, room type selector with images, amenities list, pricing breakdown, guest information form, and booking confirmation page. Evaluate how these components interact. Give 3 points for basic implementation, 7 points for functional but basic UI, and 10 points for comprehensive components with proper state management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, invalid inputs, payment failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time room availability indicators 2. Dynamic pricing based on dates 3. Integration with map to show hotel location 4. Room comparison tool). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple date selection methods) 2. Function modules unrelated to hotel booking (e.g., an unnecessary social sharing feature) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations when scrolling through hotel options). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components, API calls, and business logic), component reusability, and naming conventions. Deduct 5 points if global state management is messy or nonexistent; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no error handling for API calls. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's visual style (proper padding/margins, standard button styles) 2) Proper layout spacing (following the grid system) 3) Professional typography (readable font sizes, proper hierarchy). Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat guidelines, 5 points for inconsistent styling across pages, and 5 points for poor information hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactions conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Appropriate loading states during API calls 2) Smooth transitions between pages 3) Responsive touch feedback on interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for missing loading indicators, 3 points for jarring page transitions, and 5 points for unresponsive or confusing UI elements. Check if the app handles orientation changes and different screen sizes properly. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-local-tour-waterfall.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1317,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable. I am creating a WeChat Mini Program as my graduation project, and now I need to create a \"Local Tour\" interface. This interface mainly adopts Taobao's waterfall flow style to display tourism products (such as a large image + title: One-day Tour of Shunde + price). Please implement this interface and its logic, providing code from scratch.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the waterfall flow display properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code correctly implements the waterfall flow layout with dynamic height calculation. The implementation should handle images of varying heights, ensure columns are balanced, and maintain responsive behavior across different device widths. Score 0 if waterfall flow is not implemented, 5 if basic implementation with fixed heights, and 10 if fully dynamic with optimal column balancing algorithm.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the code follow WeChat Mini Program development specifications?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the implementation uses proper WXML/WXSS/JS structure following Mini Program best practices. Check for correct use of Mini Program components (instead of HTML), proper page lifecycle methods, and adherence to WeChat's development guidelines. Deduct 5 points if using web-based approaches incompatible with Mini Programs, and 3 points if not utilizing built-in capabilities effectively. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the tourism product card design properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review if the product cards follow the specified Taobao style with large image + title + price layout. Check for proper image handling (lazy loading, error handling), text truncation for long titles, and price formatting with currency symbol. Deduct 3 points if images are not optimized, 3 points if text overflow is not handled, and 3 points if price display doesn't match e-commerce standards. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the data loading and state management mechanisms properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Examine if the code implements proper data fetching, pagination, and state management for tourism products. Check for initial loading state, pull-to-refresh functionality, infinite scrolling with proper thresholds, and empty/error states. Deduct 5 points if pagination is not implemented, 3 points if loading states are missing, and 3 points if error handling is inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network errors, empty data, image loading failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animated transitions between cards 2. Intelligent sorting of products based on user preferences 3. Pull-down category filters with smooth animations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scrolling event handlers) 2. Function modules unrelated to tourism products display 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations or filters). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core waterfall flow functionality is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components/data services/business logic), code organization following Mini Program conventions, and performance optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no performance optimizations for image loading or rendering are implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern mobile design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching that matches travel/tourism theme 2) Proper layout spacing with sufficient card margins (8-12rpx) 3) Professional typography system (title font size ≥ 28rpx, price with emphasis). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for inconsistent visual hierarchy, and 5 points for poor information density. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program standards: 1) Card tap feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth scroll performance without jank 3) Clear loading states during data fetching. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visible frame drops during scrolling, and 5 points for jerky waterfall flow rendering during column rebalancing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-online-shopping.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1165,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. I am a programming novice and need to create a WeChat mini-program for online shopping. The content should include a changeable avatar at the top of the screen, the online store name below the avatar, and navigation options and product names further down.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat mini-program structure and configuration correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes proper app.json configuration with required pages, window settings, and tabBar navigation. Check if app.js contains valid lifecycle methods and global data management. Verify pages structure follows WeChat mini-program standards with .wxml, .wxss, .js, and .json files. Score 0 if basic mini-program structure is missing, 5 if only partial configuration is present, and 10 if complete standard structure is implemented with proper manifest configuration.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the avatar change functionality fully operational?",
-      "description": "Check whether the avatar change feature uses wx.chooseImage or wx.chooseMedia API correctly, includes image upload handling, and provides fallback for different image formats. Verify if the code handles image compression, local storage persistence, and error scenarios. Deduct 5 points if no image selection API is implemented, 3 points if image persistence is missing, and 2 points if error handling is inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are the navigation and product display components properly structured?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the navigation uses proper WeChat components (navigator, tabbar, or custom navigation) and product list implements scroll-view or list rendering with wx:for. Check if data binding follows MVVM pattern and includes proper event handling for user interactions. Deduct 5 points if navigation doesn't follow WeChat UI guidelines, 3 points if product list lacks proper data binding, and 2 points if click events are not properly handled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the shopping cart and order management system implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes add-to-cart functionality, cart item management, quantity adjustment, and basic order processing. Verify if local storage (wx.setStorageSync) is used for cart persistence and if the shopping flow is complete from product selection to order confirmation. Deduct 5 points if cart functionality is missing, 3 points if data persistence is not implemented, and 2 points if order flow is incomplete. Give 10 points if fully functional shopping system is present.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures, API errors, image loading failures, storage quota exceeded, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include try-catch blocks, loading states, and graceful degradation, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that enhance user experience?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes practical enhancements such as: 1. Product search and filtering 2. Favorites/wishlist functionality 3. User reviews and ratings 4. Share to WeChat moments 5. Scan QR code for products 6. Location-based store recommendations. Add 2 points for each well-implemented innovative feature (maximum 10 points). Features must be functional, not just UI mockups.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple cart storage methods coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to shopping (e.g., built-in games or entertainment features) 3. Overly complex animations that affect mini-program performance (e.g., heavy 3D effects or excessive particle systems). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core shopping functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating components, utils, and services), proper use of WeChat mini-program best practices, and code organization. Check for component reusability, proper data flow management, and adherence to WeChat development guidelines. Deduct 5 points if global data pollution is found or components are not properly encapsulated; deduct 3 points if code duplication rate is high; deduct 2 points if WeChat-specific optimizations are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet WeChat mini-program design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows WeChat Design Guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat native UI components and color scheme 2) Proper use of rpx units for responsive design 3) Clear visual hierarchy with appropriate spacing (following 8rpx grid system) 4) Readable typography (minimum 28rpx for body text) 5) Proper use of WeChat official icons. Deduct 3 points for each design inconsistency, 5 points for poor responsive behavior, and 2 points for accessibility issues. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the interaction smooth and follows WeChat mini-program UX patterns?",
-      "description": "Judge whether interactions conform to WeChat mini-program standards: 1) Proper loading states and feedback (wx.showLoading, wx.showToast) 2) Smooth page transitions and navigation 3) Touch-friendly interactive elements (minimum 88rpx touch targets) 4) Proper use of WeChat native interactions (pull-to-refresh, reach-bottom loading). Deduct 5 points for each missing feedback mechanism, 3 points for slow or janky animations, and 2 points for poor touch responsiveness. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-online_shopping/wechat-mini-program-price-comparison-shopping.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 998,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable for demonstration. Design a WeChat Mini Program for shopping that can search and compare prices of the same products across different websites, identify the lowest priced item, and allow direct purchase within the mini program. Please generate source code for this mini program that can be directly copied and used.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the product search and price comparison system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the search functionality that can query products across different e-commerce platforms, and if it correctly extracts and compares pricing data. Score 0 if the core search functionality is not implemented, 5 if only basic searching is available without proper price comparison logic, and 10 if the system can effectively search, normalize, and compare prices from multiple sources with proper sorting options.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the lowest price identification mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes logic to identify and highlight the lowest priced items across platforms. Evaluate if the system properly handles edge cases like identical prices, different shipping costs, or seller ratings affecting the overall value. Score 0 if no lowest price identification exists, 5 if basic comparison exists but doesn't account for additional costs/factors, and 10 if comprehensive price analysis with visual indicators is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the in-app purchase system properly designed and integrated?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements the direct purchase functionality within the mini program without redirecting to external websites. Check for WeChat payment API integration, order management system, and purchase confirmation flow. Score 0 if no in-app purchase exists, 5 if purchase flow exists but requires external redirection, and 10 if the complete purchase system is integrated with WeChat Pay and order tracking.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the multi-platform data integration mechanism properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes proper APIs or web scraping mechanisms to gather product data from multiple e-commerce platforms. Evaluate the approach for handling different data structures, authentication requirements, and rate limiting from various sources. Score 0 if no integration exists, 5 if basic integration with only 1-2 platforms, and 10 if comprehensive integration with multiple major platforms using proper error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as search failures, network interruptions, price fluctuations, and payment issues) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Price history charts 2. Automatic coupon application 3. Product authenticity verification 4. Community reviews integration). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple search mechanisms coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to shopping comparison (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations on product listings). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/business logic/API layers), use of WeChat Mini Program best practices, and proper component reusability. Deduct 5 points if global state management is poorly implemented; deduct 5 points if the code has high duplication rate (over 30%); deduct 5 points if proper Mini Program lifecycle hooks are not utilized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows WeChat Mini Program design guidelines: 1) Consistent with WeChat's design language 2) Proper layout spacing and hierarchy 3) Professional typography system (following WeChat's font standards). Deduct 3 points for each UI element that doesn't follow WeChat design principles, 5 points for inconsistent visual hierarchy, and 5 points for poor information architecture. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to WeChat Mini Program performance standards: 1) Search results loading time ≤ 2 seconds 2) Smooth transitions between product details 3) Responsive UI with proper loading states. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without loading feedback, 3 points for janky scrolling in product lists, and 5 points for non-intuitive navigation between key screens. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Online Shopping",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}