@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/high-school-physics-knowledge-summary.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1072,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. High School Physics Knowledge Summary (People's Education Version)\n\nYou are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure that the generated code is executable and displayable.\n\n---\n\n### I. Mechanics\n\n#### 1. Kinematics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Displacement**: Change in position of an object, a vector with both magnitude and direction.\n  - **Velocity**: Physical quantity describing the speed and direction of motion, a vector.\n  - **Acceleration**: Physical quantity describing the rate of change in velocity, a vector.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Uniform Linear Motion: \\( v = \\frac{s}{t} \\)\n  - Uniformly Accelerated Linear Motion:\n    - Velocity Formula: \\( v = v_0 + at \\)\n    - Displacement Formula: \\( s = v_0t + \\frac{1}{2}at^2 \\)\n    - Velocity-Displacement Relationship: \\( v^2 - v_0^2 = 2as \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Average velocity in uniformly accelerated linear motion: \\( \\bar{v} = \\frac{v_0 + v}{2} \\)\n  - Displacement difference in consecutive equal time intervals: \\( \\Delta s = aT^2 \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - In uniformly accelerated linear motion, acceleration is constant, velocity and displacement change linearly with time.\n  - The velocity-displacement relationship formula is commonly used when initial velocity and acceleration are known to find displacement.\n\n#### 2. Newton's Laws\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Force**: Interaction between objects, a vector.\n  - **Inertia**: Property of an object to maintain its state of motion.\n  - **Action and Reaction Forces**: Equal in magnitude, opposite in direction, acting on different objects.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Newton's Second Law: \\( F = ma \\)\n  - Universal Gravitation Law: \\( F = G\\frac{Mm}{r^2} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Acceleration of an object on an inclined plane: \\( a = g\\sin\\theta \\)\n  - Period of a spring oscillator: \\( T = 2\\pi\\sqrt{\\frac{m}{k}} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Newton's Second Law reveals the relationship between force and acceleration, the foundation of dynamics.\n  - The Universal Gravitation Law applies to any two objects with mass, explaining celestial motion.\n\n#### 3. Energy Conservation\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Kinetic Energy**: Energy possessed by an object due to motion, \\( E_k = \\frac{1}{2}mv^2 \\).\n  - **Potential Energy**: Energy possessed by an object due to position or state, e.g., gravitational potential energy \\( E_p = mgh \\).\n  - **Conservation of Mechanical Energy**: In situations where only gravity or elastic forces do work, mechanical energy remains constant.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Work-Energy Theorem: \\( W = \\Delta E_k = \\frac{1}{2}mv^2 - \\frac{1}{2}mv_0^2 \\)\n  - Conservation of Mechanical Energy: \\( E_k + E_p = \\text{constant} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Final velocity of an object sliding down from rest on an inclined plane: \\( v = \\sqrt{2gh} \\)\n  - Conservation of momentum in elastic collisions: \\( m_1v_1 + m_2v_2 = m_1v_1' + m_2v_2' \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The Work-Energy Theorem reveals the relationship between work and energy change.\n  - The Law of Conservation of Mechanical Energy is an important tool for solving mechanics problems.\n\n---\n\n### II. Electromagnetism\n\n#### 1. Electrostatic Field\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Electric Field Intensity**: Physical quantity describing the strength of an electric field, \\( E = \\frac{F}{q} \\).\n  - **Potential Difference**: Difference in electric potential between two points in an electric field, \\( U = Ed \\).\n  - **Coulomb's Law**: Law describing the force between point charges.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Electric Field Intensity: \\( E = \\frac{F}{q} \\)\n  - Potential Difference: \\( U = Ed \\)\n  - Coulomb's Law: \\( F = k\\frac{q_1q_2}{r^2} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Electric field intensity of a point charge: \\( E = k\\frac{Q}{r^2} \\)\n  - Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor: \\( C = \\frac{\\varepsilon S}{4\\pi kd} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Electric field intensity is a fundamental physical quantity describing electric field properties.\n  - Potential difference reflects energy changes in an electric field.\n\n#### 2. Steady Current\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Electric Current**: Amount of charge passing through a conductor cross-section per unit time, \\( I = \\frac{Q}{t} \\).\n  - **Resistance**: The obstruction of a conductor to electric current, \\( R = \\frac{U}{I} \\).\n  - **Electric Power**: Rate at which work is done by electric current, \\( P = UI \\).\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Ohm's Law: \\( I = \\frac{U}{R} \\)\n  - Electric Power: \\( P = UI = I^2R = \\frac{U^2}{R} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Total resistance in series circuits: \\( R = R_1 + R_2 + \\cdots + R_n \\)\n  - Total resistance in parallel circuits: \\( \\frac{1}{R} = \\frac{1}{R_1} + \\frac{1}{R_2} + \\cdots + \\frac{1}{R_n} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Ohm's Law is the basis for circuit analysis.\n  - Electric power reflects the efficiency of energy conversion in circuits.\n\n#### 3. Magnetic Field\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Magnetic Induction**: Physical quantity describing the strength of a magnetic field, \\( B = \\frac{F}{IL} \\).\n  - **Ampere Force**: Force exerted on a current-carrying conductor in a magnetic field, \\( F = BIL\\sin\\theta \\).\n  - **Lorentz Force**: Force exerted on a charged particle in a magnetic field, \\( F = qvB\\sin\\theta \\).\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Ampere Force: \\( F = BIL\\sin\\theta \\)\n  - Lorentz Force: \\( F = qvB\\sin\\theta \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Radius of motion for a charged particle in a magnetic field: \\( r = \\frac{mv}{qB} \\)\n  - Effective value of alternating current: \\( I_{\\text{effective}} = \\frac{I_m}{\\sqrt{2}} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Ampere Force and Lorentz Force are important concepts in electromagnetism.\n  - The laws of motion for charged particles in magnetic fields are fundamental to particle accelerator research.\n\n---\n\n### III. Thermodynamics\n\n#### 1. Laws of Thermodynamics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Internal Energy**: Total kinetic and potential energy of molecules within an object.\n  - **First Law of Thermodynamics**: Expression of the law of energy conservation in thermodynamics.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - First Law of Thermodynamics: \\( \\Delta U = Q + W \\)\n  - Ideal Gas Law: \\( PV = nRT \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Work in isothermal processes: \\( W = nRT\\ln\\frac{V_2}{V_1} \\)\n  - Temperature change in adiabatic processes: \\( T_1V_1^{\\gamma-1} = T_2V_2^{\\gamma-1} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The First Law of Thermodynamics reveals basic principles of energy conversion.\n  - The Ideal Gas Law is an important tool for studying gas properties.\n\n#### 2. Heat Transfer\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Heat Conduction**: Heat transfer through molecular motion within a substance.\n  - **Thermal Radiation**: Heat transfer through electromagnetic waves.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Heat Conduction: \\( Q = kA\\frac{\\Delta T}{d} \\)\n  - Thermal Radiation: \\( P = \\sigma A T^4 \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Peak wavelength of blackbody radiation: \\( \\lambda_{\\text{max}} = \\frac{b}{T} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Heat conduction and thermal radiation are two main methods of heat transfer.\n  - Blackbody radiation laws are the basis for studying thermal radiation.\n\n---\n\n### IV. Optics\n\n#### 1. Geometric Optics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Law of Refraction**: Law governing light refraction at interfaces between two media.\n  - **Thin Lens Formula**: Formula describing image formation by lenses.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Law of Refraction: \\( n_1\\sin\\theta_1 = n_2\\sin\\theta_2 \\)\n  - Thin Lens Formula: \\( \\frac{1}{f} = \\frac{1}{u} + \\frac{1}{v} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Critical angle for total internal reflection: \\( \\sin\\theta_c = \\frac{n_2}{n_1} \\)\n  - Spacing of light interference fringes: \\( \\Delta x = \\frac{\\lambda D}{d} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The Law of Refraction is the basis for studying light propagation.\n  - The Thin Lens Formula is an important tool for analyzing lens imaging.\n\n#### 2. Wave Optics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Interference**: Light and dark fringes produced by the superposition of two coherent light waves.\n  - **Diffraction**: Wave phenomenon occurring when light passes through narrow slits or obstacles.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Conditions for light interference: \\( \\Delta r = k\\lambda \\) (constructive), \\( \\Delta r = (k + \\frac{1}{2})\\lambda \\) (destructive)\n  - Light diffraction formula: \\( a\\sin\\theta = k\\lambda \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Position of dark fringes in single-slit diffraction: \\( a\\sin\\theta = k\\lambda \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - Interference and diffraction are important manifestations of light's wave nature.\n  - Interference patterns and diffraction patterns are important means to study the wave properties of light.\n\n---\n\n### V. Modern Physics\n\n#### 1. Quantum Mechanics\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Photoelectric Effect**: Phenomenon of electron emission when light hits a metal surface.\n  - **De Broglie Wavelength**: Relationship between matter wave wavelength and momentum.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Photoelectric Effect: \\( E_k = h\\nu - W \\)\n  - De Broglie Wavelength: \\( \\lambda = \\frac{h}{p} \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Hydrogen atom energy level formula: \\( E_n = -\\frac{13.6}{n^2} \\text{eV} \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The photoelectric effect reveals the particle nature of light.\n  - De Broglie wavelength is the basis for studying the wave nature of matter.\n\n#### 2. Relativity\n- **Key Concepts**:\n  - **Mass-Energy Equation**: Equivalence relationship between mass and energy.\n  - **Time Dilation**: Phenomenon of moving clocks slowing down.\n- **Formulas**:\n  - Mass-Energy Equation: \\( E = mc^2 \\)\n  - Time Dilation: \\( \\Delta t' = \\gamma\\Delta t \\)\n- **Secondary Conclusions**:\n  - Energy-momentum relationship in relativity: \\( E^2 = (pc)^2 + (m_0c^2)^2 \\)\n- **Understanding**:\n  - The mass-energy equation reveals the intrinsic connection between mass and energy.\n  - Time dilation is one of the important effects of relativity.\n\n---\n\n### Summary\nThe above is a detailed summary of high school physics knowledge points from the People's Education Version, covering mechanics, electromagnetism, thermodynamics, optics, and modern physics. Each knowledge point includes formulas, secondary conclusions, and understanding of important concepts to help comprehensively master physics knowledge. If further organization into code or graphical representation is needed, it can be extended based on this foundation.\n\nCan you make this into a webpage?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the webpage structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the HTML structure follows proper semantic hierarchy with appropriate heading levels (h1, h2, h3), section divisions, and navigation. The structure should organize the physics content logically by main categories (Mechanics, Electromagnetism, Thermodynamics, Optics, Modern Physics) and their subcategories. Score 0 if there's no clear structure, 5 if basic structure exists but with semantic errors, 10 if fully and correctly implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are mathematical formulas properly rendered?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of mathematical formulas. Physics formulas should be correctly rendered using MathJax/KaTeX or equivalent libraries, maintaining proper notation, symbols, and layout. Check if formulas like Newton's laws, energy equations, electromagnetic principles are displayed with proper subscripts, superscripts, and special symbols. Deduct 2 points for each incorrectly rendered formula type, with complete failure scoring 0 and perfect implementation scoring 10.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is interactive physics visualization implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes interactive visualizations for key physics concepts (e.g., projectile motion, electrical circuits, wave interference). Each major section should have at least one interactive demonstration. Score 3 points per quality interactive visualization (up to 10 points). Visualizations should accurately represent the physics concepts, be manipulable by users, and provide educational value. No visualizations score 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include a knowledge mapping system?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the code implements a visual knowledge mapping system that shows relationships between physics concepts (e.g., how Newton's laws relate to energy conservation, or how wave-particle duality connects quantum mechanics and optics). Score 0 if absent, 5 if a basic concept map exists but lacks interactivity or comprehensive coverage, and 10 if the implementation includes an interactive, comprehensive knowledge map with clear relationship indicators.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (browser compatibility issues, slow loading of mathematical rendering libraries, device-specific display problems) and provide fallback mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Interactive quizzes tied to formula comprehension 2. Physics formula calculator tools 3. Historical context sidebars for physics discoveries 4. Animated examples of physical phenomena). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Duplicate explanations of the same concept in multiple sections 2. Excessive animations that don't contribute to understanding physics concepts 3. Unnecessary script libraries that slow down page loading. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core content is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of content/presentation/behavior layers), code reusability for similar physics sections, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global script variables pollute the namespace; deduct 5 points if similar physics formulas use completely different rendering approaches; deduct 5 points if the page loading time exceeds 3 seconds due to inefficient code. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme appropriate for scientific content 2) Proper white space and content density 3) Professional typography with clear hierarchy (formula text vs. explanatory text). Deduct 3 points for each visual inconsistency between sections, 5 points for poor readability of formulas, and 5 points for lack of visual distinction between physics concept categories. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements conform to good UX principles: 1) Responsive formula rendering (≤ 500ms) 2) Smooth transitions between physics topic sections 3) Clear visual indication of interactive vs. static elements. Deduct 5 points if formula interactions have noticeable lag, 3 points if navigation between physics sections is jarring, and 5 points if users would struggle to identify which elements are interactive. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/historical-random-roll-call-system-web.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1737,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. I am a history teacher and want to conduct random roll calls in class. Please design a roll call system with a strong historical feel that can run as a webpage on any system. However, I'm not sure how to write clearer prompts.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core roll call functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the system implements basic roll call features such as student roster management, random selection mechanism, and attendance tracking. The code should allow adding/removing students, conducting random selections, and recording attendance status (present/absent). Score 0 if the selection logic is missing, 5 if only basic random selection is implemented, and 10 if the system includes comprehensive roll call management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the historical theme appropriately implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the historical theme is integrated into the design. Check for period-appropriate visual elements (such as parchment backgrounds, historical fonts, themed icons), historically inspired terminology, and thematic animations or transitions. Deduct 5 points if historical elements are merely superficial, 3 points if the theme is inconsistent. Score 10 points for an immersive historical experience that enhances rather than hinders functionality.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the system can save and retrieve roll call data between sessions. Check if local storage, IndexedDB, or another client-side storage solution is utilized to maintain student rosters, attendance records, and historical data. Deduct 5 points if only in-memory storage is used, 3 points if data persistence is partial. The full score is 10 points for comprehensive data management with backup/restore capabilities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the system easily usable without technical expertise?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the interface is intuitive enough for a history teacher with minimal technical background. Check if operations like adding students, conducting roll calls, and viewing records can be performed without consulting documentation. Deduct 5 points if critical functions require coding knowledge, 3 points if the workflow is unintuitive. Give 10 points if the system provides clear guidance and is immediately usable.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty student lists, duplicate names, invalid inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Historical facts displayed during roll call 2. Period-appropriate sound effects 3. Themed animations when selecting students). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to select random students) 2. Function modules unrelated to roll call (e.g., a built-in quiz game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the interface). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/data/logic layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if design patterns are not used appropriately; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles while maintaining historical authenticity: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast interactions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-chip-performance-comparison-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 218,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. Help me create an HTML webpage that compares chip performance.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the chip performance comparison functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the HTML/JavaScript code correctly implements a comprehensive comparison system for chip performance, including proper data visualization and comparison metrics (such as CPU benchmarks, GPU scores, memory bandwidth, power consumption). Score 0 if no comparison functionality exists, 5 points if only basic metrics are shown, 10 points if multiple sophisticated comparison metrics are implemented with proper visualization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the data visualization component properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of charts and graphs (bar charts, radar charts, line graphs, etc.) for comparing chip performance. Check if appropriate visualization libraries (D3.js, Chart.js, Highcharts, etc.) are utilized effectively. Award 10 points for interactive, responsive visualizations with appropriate scales and legends; 5 points for static but accurate visualizations; 0 points if visualizations are missing or misleading.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the data source management properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the solution includes a proper data loading mechanism (AJAX calls, fetch API, or static data arrays), data filtering options, and the ability to update/refresh data. Deduct 5 points if there's no way to update or filter data, 3 points if the data structure is inefficient for the comparison task. Full score for a flexible data management system that can accommodate various chip types and metrics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is user interaction for comparison selection implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether users can select specific chips to compare, toggle between different metrics, customize the comparison view, and save/export comparison results. Deduct 5 points if chip selection is inflexible, 3 points if metric toggling is missing, and 3 points if there are no export/save capabilities. Award full points for an intuitive, comprehensive comparison UI.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles common edge cases (no data, incomplete data, unexpected data types, browser compatibility issues). Check if proper error handling exists with user-friendly error messages. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle these cases, scoring 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exception handling exists, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check for surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Side-by-side animated comparison of thermal performance 2. Price-to-performance ratio calculator 3. Interactive historical performance trend visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple chart libraries doing the same thing) 2. Function modules unrelated to chip comparison (e.g., unnecessary social media features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (excessive animations that slow rendering). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data management/visualization/UI components), code organization, and optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high; deduct 5 points if no performance optimizations are implemented for handling large datasets. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme that differentiates chips clearly 2) Proper information hierarchy with primary metrics emphasized 3) Responsive layout that works on different screen sizes. Deduct 3 points for cluttered visualization, 5 points for poor color differentiation making comparisons difficult, and 5 points for non-responsive designs. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge the quality of interactive elements: 1) Quick response time when selecting chips to compare (≤100ms) 2) Smooth transitions when toggling between different metrics or views (300-500ms) 3) Intuitive tooltips or information panels for detailed chip specifications. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without visual feedback, 3 points for jerky transitions between comparison views, and 5 points for unintuitive navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-cooking-class-attendance-function.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1797,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the generated code is executable for display. Help me design an HTML webpage that can implement the attendance function for Cooking Class 1, with the following student list: Yang Xinyi, Huang Siyan, Pan Yueyu, Qian Yisheng, Hu Renying, Wei Yuqi, Wang Feier, Tang Jingyi, Han Yichen, Lu Yijing, Su Luyi, Jiang Liyan, Jiang Yawen, Lin Yichen, Liang Yutong, Ren Ke, Liu Xinwan, Yuan Jingying, Wu Songtao, Zheng Yi, Qu Anjie, Li Yifei, Zhang Cuiyan, Yang Ruixi, Zhu Zhipeng, Yang Jin, Gong Yunxi, Shen Yanbin, Wang Ao, Liao Rui",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic attendance function fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the core attendance recording functionality. Check if it includes: 1) Complete student list display 2) Status tracking (present/absent/late) 3) Date selection 4) Save/update mechanism. Score 0 if core functionality is missing, 5 if basic attendance marking is implemented but lacks data persistence, and 10 if complete with data storage and retrieval capability.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the student data management system properly structured?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how student data is organized and managed. The student list should be loaded dynamically (not hard-coded in HTML), properly formatted, and stored efficiently. Check whether alphabetical sorting or search functionality is implemented. Deduct 3 points if data is hard-coded in HTML elements, 3 points if there's no data validation, and 2 points if student names aren't properly displayed or formatted. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the attendance tracking include essential features for a classroom setting?",
-      "description": "Examine whether the system includes practical features needed for a cooking class environment: 1) Timestamp recording 2) Attendance statistics (percentage/summary) 3) Status differentiation (e.g., excused/unexcused absences) 4) Class date management. Deduct 2 points for each missing essential feature. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the data persistence mechanism appropriate for the application?",
-      "description": "Assess how attendance records are stored and retrieved. Check for: 1) Local storage implementation 2) Data export functionality (CSV/PDF) 3) Data integrity protection. Attendance data should persist between sessions. Deduct 5 points if there's no persistence mechanism, 3 points if data can be easily corrupted or lost, and 2 points if there's no export functionality. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as duplicate entries, browser refresh, accidental deletions, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Automatic absence notifications 2. Attendance trends visualization 3. QR code check-in option 4. Voice command recognition for marking attendance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to mark attendance) 2. Function modules unrelated to attendance tracking (e.g., a built-in game) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/controller layers), code organization, and reusability. Deduct 5 points if global variables are excessively used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for attendance marking. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy interactions when marking multiple students, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-css-javascript-learning-tool-live-editor.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 630,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Take care to ensure the code you generate is executable. Develop a programming knowledge learning tool that displays HTML/CSS/JavaScript concepts, with a real-time editing area below that allows users to input code and see the results (such as generated HTML structures or CSS styles) previewed immediately alongside.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the real-time preview functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements a seamless real-time preview system that updates as users type, with minimal delay (<100ms). Check for proper event listeners (e.g., 'input' events), debounce mechanisms for performance, and accurate rendering of HTML/CSS/JavaScript results. Score 0 if preview is not implemented, 5 if basic preview exists but has significant delay/bugs, 10 if preview works flawlessly with immediate feedback.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the HTML/CSS/JavaScript concept display system comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the tool provides clear explanations of key web development concepts, with well-structured categories and subcategories. Check for inclusion of basic concepts (e.g., HTML structure, CSS selectors, JavaScript variables) and advanced topics (e.g., CSS grid, JavaScript promises). Deduct 2 points for each major conceptual area missing, 1 point for incomplete explanations. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the code editor functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess the code editor for essential features: syntax highlighting, line numbers, auto-indentation, and proper handling of tab characters. Examine whether it supports multiple language modes (HTML/CSS/JavaScript) with appropriate highlighting for each. Deduct 3 points if syntax highlighting is missing, 2 points for lack of line numbers, 2 points for no auto-indentation, and 3 points if language switching is not supported or buggy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there proper error handling and debugging support?",
-      "description": "Check whether the tool provides meaningful error messages when user code contains syntax errors or runtime exceptions. Verify that errors are displayed in a user-friendly manner with appropriate highlighting of problematic code sections. Look for features like console output integration and debugging hints. Deduct 5 points if errors are not caught or displayed, 3 points if error messages are cryptic/unhelpful, and 2 points if line references are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as malicious code injection attempts, extremely large code inputs, infinite loops in user code, etc.) and provide containment or graceful failure. Code with strong robustness should use sandboxing techniques like iframes with proper security attributes or Web Workers for JavaScript execution. Give 10 points for comprehensive protection, 5 points for basic safeguards, and 0 points if no protection mechanisms exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Code snippets library for quick learning 2. Interactive challenges with automated validation 3. Visualization of DOM structure or CSS box model 4. Split view for before/after code changes). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple preview rendering engines) 2. Function modules unrelated to code learning (e.g., built-in games unrelated to programming) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that distract from learning). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI components/editor logic/preview rendering), code reusability, and appropriate design patterns. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if appropriate design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns between different functional components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern learning tool design principles: 1) Clear visual hierarchy with concept display prominently separated from code input/output areas 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (monospace fonts for code, sans-serif for instructions, with proper size contrast). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for poor contrast between code and instructions, and 5 points for chaotic layout that hampers the learning experience. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects facilitate learning: 1) Preview updates within 200ms of code changes 2) Smooth transitions when switching between concept categories 3) Clear visual focus guidance for the currently selected concept or code section. Deduct 5 points for sluggish preview updates, 3 points for jarring transitions between views, and 5 points for confusing navigation that makes it difficult to track learning progress. Consider whether resize handles exist for adjusting the ratio between editor and preview. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-demo-visualize-automotive-knowledge.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1646,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Use an HTML demo to visualize basic knowledge in the automotive field.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the automotive knowledge visualization comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the HTML demo covers key automotive concepts (e.g., engine types, car parts, drivetrain systems, safety features). Score 0 if minimal content is presented, 5 if basic concepts are covered, and 10 if comprehensive automotive knowledge with proper categorization is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the interactive visualization effectively implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the demo includes interactive elements like hoverable components, clickable car parts, expandable information sections, or animated demonstrations of automotive systems. Deduct 5 points if only static content is presented. Award full points if the visualization allows users to interact with multiple automotive concepts in an intuitive manner.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the technical accuracy of automotive information maintained?",
-      "description": "Verify that the automotive information presented is technically accurate. Check for correct terminology, accurate descriptions of automotive systems, and proper relationships between components. Deduct 3 points for each significant factual error. The visualization should maintain educational value through technical precision.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the visual representation clear and instructive?",
-      "description": "Assess whether diagrams, illustrations or models clearly represent automotive concepts. Evaluate if visual aids enhance understanding rather than causing confusion. Check for proper labeling, appropriate use of colors for differentiation, and logical visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points if visuals are unclear or misleading.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, resizing windows, touch vs. mouse interactions) and provide responsive design. Code with strong robustness should degrade gracefully across devices, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. 3D interactive car models 2. Real-time physics simulations of automotive systems 3. Comparison tools for different vehicles or components). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant explanations of the same automotive concepts 2. Function modules unrelated to automotive knowledge 3. Fancy effects that affect performance without educational value. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core educational content is obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/view/interaction layers), code organization, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global variables are overused; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if resource loading isn't optimized for performance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during animations, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-math-quiz-generator.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1692,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. Create an HTML-based mathematics calculation quiz generator.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the mathematics calculation quiz generation system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements multiple types of mathematical operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) with configurable difficulty levels and question quantity. Check if it includes proper random number generation, fraction handling, and decimal precision control. Score 0 if only basic addition is implemented, 5 if 2-3 operation types are covered, and 10 if all four operations with advanced features (parentheses, mixed operations) are fully included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the answer validation and scoring mechanism accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system includes real-time answer validation, immediate feedback display, and comprehensive scoring calculation. Evaluate if it handles edge cases like decimal precision, negative numbers, and invalid inputs. Deduct 5 points if validation logic has mathematical errors, and 3 points if scoring doesn't account for time factors or difficulty weighting. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the quiz configuration and customization system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether users can customize quiz parameters including difficulty level, operation types, number range, question quantity, and time limits. Check if configurations are properly validated and applied. Deduct 5 points if configuration changes don't take effect immediately, and 3 points if parameter validation is missing. Give 10 points if fully customizable with preset difficulty modes.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete quiz session management and progress tracking implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes complete session lifecycle management with features like quiz timer, progress indicator, question navigation, and results summary. Evaluate if it provides detailed performance analytics and history tracking. Deduct 5 points if session state is not properly maintained, and 3 points if progress indicators are inaccurate. Give 10 points if fully implemented with comprehensive analytics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid mathematical expressions, division by zero, extremely large numbers, malformed user inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Adaptive difficulty adjustment based on performance 2. Mathematical concept explanations for wrong answers 3. Achievement badges and progress gamification 4. Step-by-step solution breakdown). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple validation logics coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to mathematics quiz (e.g., built-in games or social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect calculation performance (e.g., heavy animations during quiz sessions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core quiz functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating quiz logic/UI components/data management), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or proper separation of concerns is not implemented; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if mathematical calculations are not properly abstracted into reusable functions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Clean and educational-appropriate color scheme (avoiding distracting colors) 2) Proper layout spacing with clear question-answer separation 3) Readable typography for mathematical expressions (proper font size ≥ 16px for questions). Deduct 3 points for each cluttered visual element, 5 points for poor mathematical notation display, and 5 points for confusing layout that hinders learning. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements conform to educational UX principles: 1) Immediate feedback on answer submission ≤ 100ms 2) Smooth transitions between questions 300-500ms 3) Clear visual indicators for correct/incorrect answers 4) Intuitive navigation controls. Deduct 5 points for each interaction without proper feedback, 3 points for delayed mathematical expression rendering, and 5 points if key functions like 'Next Question' or 'Submit' are hard to locate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/html-mbti-webpage-with-images.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1315,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable when possible. Write an HTML webpage code with MBTI as the theme, and include images.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the MBTI theme fully implemented in the webpage?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the webpage effectively incorporates MBTI concepts, including clear explanations of the 4 key dichotomies (E/I, S/N, T/F, J/P) and 16 personality types. Score 0 if MBTI concepts are absent, 5 if only basic mention without explanation, and 10 if comprehensive MBTI framework is presented with personality descriptions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are appropriate images incorporated for MBTI visualization?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes relevant images for MBTI types (such as type icons, characteristic illustrations, or representative figures). Images should have proper alt text, responsive sizing, and meaningful correlation to MBTI content. Deduct 3 points if images are unrelated to MBTI, 3 points if alt text is missing, and 5 points if no images are included at all.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is there interactive MBTI functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the webpage includes interactive elements like personality quizzes, type comparison tools, or dynamic type descriptions. Score 0 if no interactivity exists, 5 if basic interactivity (like simple hover effects) is present, and 10 if comprehensive interactive features (like a working MBTI assessment) are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is personalized content based on MBTI types provided?",
-      "description": "Review whether the webpage offers customized content based on MBTI types, such as career recommendations, relationship compatibility, or personal development advice. Deduct 5 points if personalization is completely absent, and 3 points if only shallow personalization exists. Award full 10 points if deep, research-backed personalized content is presented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as missing images, different screen sizes, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide fallback solutions. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual type matching animations 2. Interactive type compatibility charts 3. Personality archetype visualizations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to display the same type descriptions) 2. Function modules unrelated to MBTI (e.g., unrelated social media feeds) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core MBTI content is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating content/style/behavior), semantic HTML usage, CSS organization, and JavaScript best practices. Deduct 5 points if CSS is inline rather than in a stylesheet; deduct 5 points if the code contains duplicated functions or styles; deduct 5 points if there's no responsive design implementation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}