@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/valorant-tutorial-page-html-multimedia.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1474,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration purposes. Create a VALORANT tutorial page using HTML, embedding multimedia (video and audio).",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the VALORANT tutorial content structure comprehensively implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the HTML structure includes complete tutorial sections covering core VALORANT gameplay elements: agent abilities, weapon mechanics, map knowledge, and tactical strategies. Check if content is organized with proper semantic HTML5 tags (section, article, nav, aside). Score 0 if basic tutorial structure is missing, 5 if only partial content sections are implemented, and 10 if all major tutorial categories are comprehensively covered with logical content hierarchy.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the multimedia integration (video/audio) properly implemented and optimized?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether video and audio elements are correctly embedded with appropriate formats (MP4/WebM for video, MP3/OGG for audio), include fallback options, and have proper controls. Check for autoplay policies compliance, loading optimization (lazy loading, preload attributes), and accessibility features (captions, audio descriptions). Deduct 5 points if no fallback formats provided, 3 points if accessibility features missing, and 5 points if loading performance is poor. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the interactive tutorial navigation and progress tracking system implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the tutorial includes interactive navigation elements, progress indicators, and user progress tracking mechanisms. Evaluate if users can jump between tutorial sections, bookmark progress, and receive completion feedback. Assess if the navigation is intuitive with breadcrumbs, chapter selection, and smooth scrolling. Deduct 5 points if progress tracking is missing, 3 points if navigation is confusing, and 5 points if no interactive elements are present. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the VALORANT-specific visual theming and branding authentically implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the page design authentically reflects VALORANT's visual identity including color schemes (teal/red accent colors), typography matching game aesthetics, and UI elements consistent with game interface. Check for proper use of game assets, iconography, and layout patterns that mirror the game's design language. Give 10 points if fully authentic to VALORANT branding, 5 points if partially consistent, and 0 points if generic gaming design without VALORANT-specific elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as media loading failures, browser compatibility issues, network interruptions, and user interaction errors) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should include error handling for media elements, graceful degradation for unsupported features, and proper validation. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points if average robustness, and 0 points if no exception handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the tutorial experience (e.g., 1. Interactive agent ability demonstrations 2. Mini-games for aim training 3. Real-time strategy quiz elements 4. 3D weapon inspection viewer 5. Voice-over narration with professional casting). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple video players for same content) 2. Function modules unrelated to VALORANT tutorials (e.g., unrelated game content or social media feeds) 3. Excessive animations that distract from learning content. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core tutorial functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating content/styling/interaction layers), semantic HTML structure, CSS organization, and JavaScript modularity. Check for proper file organization, comment documentation, and maintainable code structure. Deduct 5 points if poor separation of concerns or inline styles dominate; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no documentation or comments provided. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern web design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching consistent with VALORANT branding (no more than 4 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows 8px grid system) 3) Professional typography (body font ≥ 16px, line height ≥ 1.5, proper contrast ratios) 4) Responsive design for different screen sizes. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for poor color contrast or accessibility issues, and 5 points for non-responsive layout. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the multimedia interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether multimedia elements and interactions conform to user experience standards: 1) Video/audio loading feedback with progress indicators 2) Smooth playback controls with ≤100ms response time 3) Proper volume controls and mute functionality 4) Clear visual focus states for interactive elements 5) Seamless transitions between tutorial sections. Deduct 5 points for each media element without proper controls, 3 points for laggy interactions, and 5 points for unclear navigation states. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/video-interactive-q-a-creation-tool.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 669,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please develop a video interactive Q&A creation tool that allows educators to upload instructional videos and insert interactive questions (such as single-choice, multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank, etc.) at specific time points in the video. When learners watch to the corresponding time point, the video will automatically pause, display the question, and continue playing after the answer is provided. The system needs to collect data on learners' responses and generate learning reports. It should support question bank management and random question selection functionality.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the video player integration and control fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly integrates a video player with full control capabilities (play, pause, seek, volume) and implements precise timing mechanisms to pause at question points. Score 0 if no functional video player exists, 5 if basic video playback works but has timing accuracy issues (>500ms error), and 10 if the integration is seamless with frame-accurate question triggering (<100ms error).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the interactive question system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code supports all required question types (single-choice, multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blank) with proper validation, feedback mechanisms, and timed insertion. Deduct 3 points if any question type is missing, 2 points for each type that lacks proper validation, and 3 points if question timing insertion is imprecise or buggy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the educator interface for content creation comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Assess whether educators can efficiently upload videos, create questions with a rich editor, set timing points via visual timeline, preview the learner experience, and manage existing content. Deduct 2 points if video upload lacks progress indicators or format validation, 3 points if the question editor is too basic (lacking formatting options or media insertion), 3 points if timeline manipulation is not intuitive, and 2 points if preview functionality is absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are the data collection and learning report generation features complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of response tracking, analytics generation, and visualization of learning outcomes. Check for per-question statistics, per-student performance tracking, and trend analysis capabilities. Deduct 3 points if raw data is stored without proper aggregation, 3 points if visualization is missing or poorly implemented, 2 points if export options are limited, and 2 points if historical comparison features are absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as video playback errors, network interruptions, partial answers, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-based question generation from video content 2. Heat maps showing where students struggle most 3. Adaptive difficulty based on student performance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementations of similar functions (e.g., multiple video control mechanisms) 2. Function modules unrelated to the core educational purpose (e.g., complex social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that distract from learning). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating video player/question logic/analytics layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Question appearance transitions are smooth without jarring the learning experience 2) Video pauses and resumes without visual artifacts 3) Clear visual focus guidance when questions appear. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy transitions between video and questions, and 5 points for confusing UI state changes when answering questions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/virtual-spread-plate-experiment-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 231,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. I am a biology teacher and need help designing an HTML webpage for a virtual experiment demonstration of the spread plate technique for a biology class. The webpage should include experimental materials and equipment: test tubes with yeast culture broth, cotton plugs, solid culture medium, inoculation loops, alcohol lamp (flammable), clean bench, and inoculation loops. The material and tool icons should be aesthetically pleasing and resemble actual images, with colors matching the real objects. Icons should be positioned on both sides of the page, movable, and highly interactive.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the spread plate technique procedure accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements all key steps of the spread plate technique (sterilizing the loop, cooling, sampling, inoculation, spreading, incubation). Score 0 if core procedure steps are missing, 5 if basic steps are implemented but lack scientific accuracy, and 10 if all microbiology protocols are followed with proper sequence and safety considerations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are all required experimental materials and equipment fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether all materials (test tubes with yeast culture broth, cotton plugs, solid culture medium, inoculation loops, alcohol lamp, clean bench) are implemented with proper visual representation. Deduct 2 points for each missing item. All items must be interactive and movable. Full implementation with accurate visual representation scores 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the drag-and-drop interaction system properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the quality of the drag-and-drop system for moving experimental tools. Check for smooth animation (60fps), precise positioning, proper z-index management, and intuitive interaction. Deduct 3 points if there's noticeable lag, 3 points if tool positioning is imprecise, and 4 points if tools can't be reliably manipulated. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Are experimental safety procedures and scientific accuracy maintained?",
-      "description": "Assess if the simulation enforces proper microbiology safety protocols (flame sterilization, aseptic technique, contamination prevention) and follows scientific accuracy. Deduct 5 points if critical safety procedures are missing or incorrect. Deduct 5 points if the simulation allows scientifically impossible actions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as rapid multiple clicks, dropping objects in invalid areas, browser resizing) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Microscopic view of yeast cells 2. Time-lapse of colony growth 3. Quiz integration to test student knowledge). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple drag-and-drop systems) 2. Function modules unrelated to the spread plate technique (e.g., unrelated biological processes) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that distract from learning). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating experiment logic/view/interaction layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation of concerns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional educational design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether material and tool icons are aesthetically pleasing and resemble actual lab equipment with accurate colors. Check for: 1) Visual clarity and high-quality graphics 2) Proper layout with tools easily accessible on both sides of the page 3) Clear visual instructions and labels. Deduct 3 points for each low-quality or unrealistic icon, 5 points for poor layout of materials, and 5 points for confusing visual hierarchy. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and educational?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects support learning objectives: 1) Clear visual feedback when tools are used correctly/incorrectly 2) Appropriate animation speed that matches real laboratory timing 3) Instructional cues that guide proper technique. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for animations that are too fast to observe properly, and 5 points for missing educational guidance during critical steps. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/visualization-based-q-a-software-20-questions.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1465,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to produce executable code for demonstration. Write a visualization-based Q&A software that includes 20 questions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Q&A system core functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a complete question-answer system with 20 questions through HTML/JavaScript, including question navigation, answer selection/input validation, and scoring mechanism. Score 0 if basic Q&A logic is missing, 5 if only simple question display is implemented, and 10 if complete interactive Q&A with proper validation and scoring is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the visualization component effectively implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the visualization includes dynamic progress indicators, interactive charts/graphs for results display, and real-time visual feedback during Q&A sessions. Must include data visualization libraries (Chart.js/D3.js) or custom SVG implementations. Deduct 5 points if only static progress bars are used, and 3 points if result visualization lacks interactivity. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the question management system well-designed with proper data structure?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the 20 questions are properly structured with categorization, difficulty levels, and metadata. Check if question randomization, filtering, and adaptive questioning logic are implemented. Deduct 5 points if questions are hard-coded without structure, and 3 points if no question management features exist. Full score requires dynamic question loading and intelligent sequencing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is comprehensive user progress tracking and analytics implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes detailed progress tracking, performance analytics, time tracking per question, and historical data storage. Must include visual dashboards showing user performance trends and detailed statistics. Deduct 5 points if no data persistence is implemented, and 3 points if analytics are basic without visualization. Give 10 points if fully implemented with rich analytics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, browser compatibility issues, data corruption, session timeouts, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Adaptive difficulty adjustment based on performance 2. Social sharing of results with custom visualizations 3. Voice input/output capabilities 4. Gamification elements like achievements/badges). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scoring systems coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to Q&A (e.g., built-in games or entertainment features) 3. Excessive animations that impact performance (e.g., complex particle effects on every interaction). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core Q&A functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating question logic/UI components/data management), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or no design patterns are used; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if no proper separation of concerns exists. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Clear visual hierarchy for questions and answers. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for glaring color combinations, and 5 points for chaotic text layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Question transition animations (300-500ms duration) 2) Answer selection feedback ≤ 100ms 3) Progress visualization updates smoothly 4) Clear visual focus guidance throughout the Q&A flow. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between questions, and 5 points for unclear navigation or progress indicators. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/vocabulary-learning-app.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1248,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and expert responses. Make sure the generated code is executable when possible. Task description:\n\nI need you to develop a vocabulary learning app from scratch using React Native + FastAPI + SQLite, supporting features like offline learning, review, and difficult word categorization. Please develop strictly according to the following requirements.\n\n📌 Technical Requirements:\n\nFrontend: React Native (using Expo)\n\nBackend: FastAPI\n\nDatabase: SQLite (supporting offline storage)\n\nFrontend animations: Using react-native-reanimated\n\nData storage: Using AsyncStorage to store user progress, supporting offline learning\n\nState management: Using useContext or Redux Toolkit (as needed)\n\nBackend deployment: Render\n\n📌 Main App Functions:\n1️⃣ Course Management\n\nDisplay course list in HomeScreen, each course includes name, vocabulary count, a progress bar, 2 small circles or other elements to show the number of difficult words and words needing review\n-Have a \"create a new course\" button to help create new courses (displays a small screen with course name and save button)\nSupport course download, allowing users to learn offline\n\nSupport course deletion, but with confirmation prompts to avoid accidental deletion\n\nSupport course selection, all learning modes will load data based on the user's selected course\n\n2️⃣ Learning New Words (LearningScreen)\n\nAutomatically selects 5 new words each time you enter\n-When learning a new word, first displays a word card (wordscreen)\n\nUsers must answer correctly 5 times for each word before it enters the review library\n\nIf answered incorrectly, correct answer count doesn't accumulate\n\nIf users exit midway, progress is reset\n\nSupport 4 learning modes:\n\n4-choice quiz (select definition)\n\n4-choice quiz (select word)\n\n4-choice quiz (select correct pronunciation) (if the word has no pronunciation, this won't be offered)\n\nSpelling mode (10 characters are displayed below (including the word's characters), select the correct characters; there's a hint button that shows one character (for example, for the word \"不错\", if the user hasn't selected \"不\" yet, clicking hint will display \"不\", if the user has already selected \"不\" then it will show \"错\" and continue to the next question; there's also an \"I don't know\" button that directly shows the result (counted as incorrect))\n\n3️⃣ Quick Practice (QuickPracticeScreen)\n\nQuick practice & review share the same word library\n\nOptimize UI to prevent users from mistakenly thinking there are 5 answers\n-Upon entering, there's a 60-second countdown to 0, users do 4-choice quizzes (reference 4-choice quizzes in learning screen) (vocabulary comes from review), unlimited questions until 3 wrong answers or time reaches 0.\n\n4️⃣ Review Function (ReviewScreen)\n-Each time you enter, 25 words are selected for review (according to the learning algorithm), one question per word, wrong answers will trigger another question for the same word (can display questions for this word later), until all are completed.\n\nReview includes 4 question types:\n\n4-choice quiz (select definition)\n\n4-choice quiz (select word)\n\n4-choice quiz (select correct pronunciation)\n\nSpelling mode (10 characters are displayed below (including the word's characters), select the correct characters; there's a hint button that shows one character (for example, for the word \"不错\", if the user hasn't selected \"不\" yet, clicking hint will display \"不\", if the user has already selected \"不\" then it will show \"错\" and continue to the next question; there's also an \"I don't know\" button that directly shows the result (counted as incorrect))\n\n5️⃣ Difficult Word Review (DifficultWordsScreen)\n-Upon entering, 5 difficult words are selected, 5 questions per word, wrong answers add one more question for that word, until all are completed.\n\nDifficult word review includes 4 question types (same as review function)\n-For each word, must answer correctly three times to return to the review vocabulary library.\n\n6. Effective for all learning modes (except exceptions)\n\nWhen answered incorrectly, directly displays the word card for this word, with a \"next question\" button below (not applicable to quick learning)\n\nWhen answered incorrectly, shows the correct answer (correct answer turns green, wrong answer turns red)\n\nWhen answered correctly, uses bright green (enhanced visual feedback), then directly proceeds to the next question\n-In all modes, each question has a delete button at the top (directly removes this word from the course) and a difficult word flag (directly adds to difficult words)\n-Questions initially don't show pinyin, but after completion (whether right or wrong) pinyin is displayed (below the question)\nAudio support: If a word has audio, each question automatically plays audio (except for 4-choice quiz (select correct pronunciation)\n\n7. Word Explanation (WordScreen)\n-Displays word information here (vocabulary, pinyin, meaning, examples, a button to play word pronunciation)\n\n8. Courses (CourseScreen)\n-Accessed by clicking a course in course management\n-Has an \"add file\" button for uploading CSV files\n-Displays course vocabulary, difficult words and review words count, 200 words per page\n-Clicking a word here enters that word's card (WordScreen)\n-Each word can be individually deleted\n-Words categorized as difficult have a small indicator\n\n8. Learning Algorithm\n\nSRS Algorithm Core Logic\n\n1. Core Variables\n\nDifficulty coefficient (D): Initial value 0, range [0, 1].\n\nInterval (I): Initial value 1 day.\n\nPerformance score (S): User rating, range [0, 5].\n\nEase factor (EF): Initial value 2.5, range [1.3, 2.5].\n\n2. Algorithm Formula\n\nEase factor (EF) update:\n\nEF_new = EF_old + (0.1 - (5 - S) * (0.08 + (5 - S) * 0.02))\n\nIf EF_new < 1.3, then EF_new = 1.3.\n\nIf EF_new > 2.5, then EF_new = 2.5.\n\nInterval (I) calculation:\n\nIf S ≥ 3:\n\nI_new = I_old * EF_new\n\nIf S < 3:\n\nI_new = I_old * 0.5\n\nDifficulty coefficient (D) update:\n\nD_new = D_old + (0.1 - (5 - S) * 0.02)\n\nIf D_new < 0, then D_new = 0.\n\nIf D_new > 1, then D_new = 1.\n\n3. Data Structure\n\nLearning unit table:\n\n{ \"id\": \"123\", \"content\": \"apple\", \"translation\": \"苹果\", \"audio\": \"apple.mp3\", \"image\": \"apple.jpg\", \"tags\": [\"fruit\", \"basic\"] }\n\nUser progress table:\n\n{ \"user_id\": \"456\", \"unit_id\": \"123\", \"last_reviewed\": \"2023-10-01\", \"next_review\": \"2023-10-08\", \"interval\": 7, \"score\": 3, \"difficulty\": 0.3, \"ease_factor\": 2.0 }\n\n4. Review Queue Generation\n\nDaily review queue:\n\nQuery all learning units where next_review ≤ current date.\n\nSort by priority:\n\nLearning units with lower ratings have priority.\n\nLearning units with shorter intervals have priority.\n\nNew learning queue:\n\nRecommend a certain number of new learning units for users daily (e.g., 5).\n\n5. Algorithm Implementation Steps\n\nFirst-time learning:\n\nInitialization:\n\nI = 1, D = 0, EF = 2.5 next_review = today + I\n\nUser practice:\n\nAfter users complete practice, input performance score S.\n\nUpdate algorithm:\n\nUpdate ease factor EF.\n\nUpdate interval I.\n\nUpdate difficulty coefficient D.\n\nUpdate next review time next_review.\n\nSave data:\n\nSave updated I_new, EF_new, D_new, next_review to user progress table.\n\n📌 Other Requirements:\n✅ Ensure UI is strictly user-friendly, beautiful (must research), interactive, with smooth animations (this part must be researched, very important)\n✅ Ensure changes are compatible with existing functions, not affecting user experience\n-Main color: dark blue, research appropriate colors (research color palette, etc.)",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the React Native + FastAPI + SQLite integration complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the codebase fully integrates all three required technologies. Check if React Native frontend (using Expo) can communicate with FastAPI backend, if SQLite database is properly implemented with schema supporting all data requirements, and if offline functionality works through AsyncStorage. Score 0 if any major component is missing, 5 if basic integration exists but with significant gaps, and 10 if all technologies are seamlessly integrated with proper error handling between layers.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the course management system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the HomeScreen displays all required course elements (name, vocabulary count, progress bar, difficult words indicator, review indicator), and if the create/download/delete course functions work properly. Check if course selection affects all learning modes correctly. Deduct 3 points if visual indicators are missing, 3 points if any CRUD operation fails, and 4 points if course selection doesn't properly cascade to learning modes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are all learning modes implemented according to specifications?",
-      "description": "Check if all 4 learning modes (two 4-choice quizzes, pronunciation quiz, and spelling mode) are implemented with the specified logic (5 correct answers to enter review library, progress reset on exit). Verify the hint system in spelling mode functions as described. Deduct 2 points for each incorrectly implemented mode, 3 points if progress tracking is broken, and 3 points if the hint system doesn't work as specified. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SRS learning algorithm correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Analyze the implementation of the specified spaced repetition algorithm, checking if all core variables (difficulty coefficient, interval, performance score, ease factor) are properly calculated and stored. Verify that review queues are generated correctly based on the formula. Deduct 3 points if formula implementation is incorrect, 3 points if data persistence is faulty, and 4 points if the review queue generation logic doesn't prioritize as specified. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network interruption, data inconsistency between offline and online modes, invalid user inputs, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should handle offline mode gracefully, implement proper error boundaries in React components, and include API fallbacks. Give 10 points if all edge cases are handled, 5 points if basic error handling exists, and 0 points if critical edge cases are ignored.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Gamification elements beyond requirements 2. Audio recording for pronunciation comparison 3. Visual learning aids like mnemonics 4. Social sharing of progress). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple state management solutions coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary learning (e.g., a built-in general calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down the learning experience). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separation of UI components, business logic, and data layer), code reuse patterns for similar learning modes, proper TypeScript types, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state is overused instead of component composition; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if proper CI/CD for both frontend and backend is missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows the dark blue color scheme requirements and modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color palette with proper contrast ratios 2) Consistent spacing and alignment across screens 3) Professional typography system with proper hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for inconsistent UI elements, 5 points for poor color contrast affecting accessibility, and 5 points for chaotic layout causing cognitive overload. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the animation system smooth and enhancing user experience?",
-      "description": "Judge whether react-native-reanimated is properly implemented for smooth animations: 1) Transition animations between screens 2) Feedback animations for correct/incorrect answers 3) Progress indicators with fluid motion 4) Card flip or reveal animations for word learning. Deduct 3 points for janky animations that drop frames, 4 points for missing animations in key interactions, and 3 points if animations distract from rather than enhance learning. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/vocabulary-learning-webpage.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1727,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable. Please help me create an HTML program for a vocabulary learning webpage that has an attractive interface, high recognizability, and is easy to operate.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the vocabulary learning system's core functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements essential vocabulary learning features such as word display, definitions, examples, and some form of learning/testing mechanism. Score 0 if there's no vocabulary display functionality, 5 if only basic word display is implemented, and 10 if comprehensive vocabulary learning features (including word display, definitions, usage examples, and testing mechanisms) are included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the vocabulary storage and retrieval mechanism designed effectively?",
-      "description": "Check how vocabulary data is stored and retrieved. Look for structured data organization (arrays/objects), potential for persistent storage (localStorage/IndexedDB), and efficient data loading mechanisms. Deduct 5 points if vocabulary is hardcoded with no data structure, 3 points if there's no mechanism to add new words. Award full 10 points for a well-structured data model with persistence capabilities.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the page implement any learning optimization techniques?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the implementation includes educational techniques like spaced repetition, flashcards, progress tracking, or personalized learning paths. Deduct 5 points if no learning optimization is implemented, 3 points if only basic review functionality exists. Give full 10 points for sophisticated learning algorithms that adapt to user progress.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the user interaction for vocabulary practice well designed?",
-      "description": "Assess the implementation of interactive practice features like quizzes, matching exercises, fill-in-the-blanks, or pronunciation practice. Evaluate if the code provides immediate feedback on user inputs and tracks progress. Score 0 if no practice features exist, 5 for basic quizzing, and 10 for multiple engaging practice modes with feedback systems.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty vocabulary lists, invalid user inputs, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the vocabulary learning experience (e.g., 1. Audio pronunciation 2. Visual mnemonics 3. Gamification elements 4. Social sharing capabilities). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple ways to test the same vocabulary) 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary learning (e.g., a built-in calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core learning functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/UI/logic layers), code organization, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global variables are overused or if there's no separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no consideration for scalability or future enhancements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Clear visual hierarchy for learning content. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for vocabulary learning flow. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for disruptive animations during learning sessions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key learning functions. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/vocabulary-memorization-pep-8th-grade-english.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 972,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure to ensure the generated code is executable for display purposes. Create a vocabulary memorization software for People's Education Press 8th grade (second semester) English textbook.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the vocabulary database implementation complete?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes a comprehensive vocabulary database for the 8th grade PEP textbook (second semester). The database should include words, meanings, example sentences, and unit classifications. Score 0 if there's no structured database, 5 if only words and meanings are included, and 10 if the database is complete with words, phonetics, definitions, example sentences, and unit organization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the memorization system implement effective learning mechanisms?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code implements scientifically-backed memorization techniques such as spaced repetition, recall testing, or the Leitner system. Check if the system tracks user learning progress and adapts difficulty accordingly. Deduct 5 points if there's no algorithm for spaced repetition, and 3 points if there's no mechanism to prioritize difficult words. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is there a comprehensive assessment and progress tracking system?",
-      "description": "Review if the code includes various test modes (multiple choice, spelling, matching, etc.) and maintains learning statistics. Check if it provides performance metrics like accuracy rates, mastery levels, and learning curves. Deduct 5 points if assessment lacks variety, and 5 points if there's no progress visualization. Give 10 points for a complete system with diverse test types and detailed analytics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the software provide effective vocabulary organization by units/themes?",
-      "description": "Check if vocabulary is properly organized according to PEP 8th grade textbook units, allowing students to focus on specific sections. The system should allow filtering by unit, difficulty level, and mastery status. Deduct 3 points if unit organization is missing, 3 points if there's no difficulty classification, and 4 points if there's no custom list feature. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as incorrect inputs, data loading failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Visual mnemonics for vocabulary 2. Game-based learning modules 3. Voice recognition for pronunciation practice). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar learning methods (e.g., multiple flashcard systems with overlapping functionality) 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary learning (e.g., a built-in general calculator) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that slow down word transitions). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/learning logic/view layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational software design principles: 1) Age-appropriate color scheme for 8th graders 2) Proper layout spacing and information hierarchy 3) Professional font system with good readability (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for distracting color combinations, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and developmentally appropriate?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to adolescent learning characteristics: 1) Clear feedback for right/wrong answers within 100ms 2) Appropriate animation duration between 300-500ms 3) Intuitive navigation suitable for 13-14 year old users. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for distracting transitions, and 5 points if key learning functions are difficult to locate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/vocabulary-practice-app-chinese-8th-grade.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1411,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and expert responses. Be sure that any code you produce is executable and displayable. How do I create an app for practicing new vocabulary words from the \"Reading and Writing\" section at the end of each lesson in the 8th grade second semester Chinese Language Arts textbook (non-provincial edition)?",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the vocabulary management system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements a database/storage system for vocabulary words, with proper categorization by textbook lessons. Check if it includes CRUD operations (Create, Read, Update, Delete) for words, definitions, and example sentences. Score 0 if core vocabulary storage is not implemented, 5 if basic storage exists without lesson organization, and 10 if complete vocabulary management with lesson-based organization is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the learning modes comprehensive and pedagogically sound?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether multiple learning modes are implemented (e.g., flashcards, multiple choice, fill-in-the-blank, matching exercises). Check if the implementation follows spaced repetition principles and adapts to the student's performance. Deduct 3 points if spaced repetition is missing, 3 points if there are fewer than 3 practice modes, and 2 points if performance tracking is absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the lesson-based organization properly structured?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the app correctly organizes vocabulary by lessons according to the textbook structure. Check if it allows navigation between lessons, tracking completion rates, and provides lesson-specific statistics. Deduct 5 points if lessons cannot be individually selected, 3 points if progress tracking per lesson is missing, and 2 points if there's no visual indication of lesson completion status. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the progress tracking and performance analysis feature implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes comprehensive progress tracking, performance analysis, and visualization of learning outcomes. Score should reflect implementation of learning curves, mistake frequency analysis, and time-based performance metrics. Deduct 4 points if visualization is missing, 3 points if historical performance comparison is absent, and 3 points if there's no weak-point identification system. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid input, network interruption, data corruption, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Audio pronunciation of vocabulary 2. Handwriting recognition for character practice 3. Contextual usage examples from real texts 4. Gamification elements that motivate continued learning). Add 2.5 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar learning activities 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary learning 3. Fancy effects that affect performance or distract from learning. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core learning functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data/logic/UI layers), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation between UI and business logic. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface design meet educational application standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows educational UX principles: 1) Age-appropriate visual elements for 8th graders 2) Distraction-free learning environment 3) Clear instructional cues 4) Proper text size and readability (min 16px font size). Deduct 3 points for each distracting visual element, 5 points for poor readability, and 5 points for inappropriate or confusing navigation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the learning interaction intuitive and responsive?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interaction design supports effective learning: 1) Immediate feedback on answers within 500ms 2) Clear indication of correct/incorrect responses 3) Intuitive input methods appropriate for Chinese character entry 4) Smooth transitions between learning activities. Deduct 3 points for delayed feedback, 3 points for confusing response indicators, and 4 points for cumbersome character input methods. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}