@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/leaves-falling-from-plant-autumn.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 189,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to make the generated code executable for display whenever possible.\n Please help me implement the following requirement using code. Create an SVG that shows: leaves falling from a plant in autumn.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG plant structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG includes a well-structured plant/tree with defined trunk, branches, and leaves. Check if proper SVG elements (paths, groups, etc.) are used with appropriate attributes. Score 0 if no plant structure exists, 5 if basic structure is present but lacks detail, and 10 if the plant is well-designed with realistic proportions and natural appearance.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the leaf falling animation correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if leaves detach from the plant and fall with realistic physics using SVG animations or JavaScript. Evaluate the motion path (should be curved/swaying rather than straight down), timing variations between leaves, and rotation effects. Deduct 5 points if leaves fall in identical patterns, and 3 points if the animation timing is unnatural. Full score requires varied, natural-looking falling patterns.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are autumn-appropriate visual elements included?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the implementation includes autumn-specific visual elements: appropriate color palette (oranges, reds, yellows, browns), gradual color changes in leaves, and seasonal atmosphere. Check if leaves change color before falling. Deduct 5 points if colors don't reflect autumn, and 3 points if there's no color transition. The full score requires a convincing autumn aesthetic.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there interactivity or environmental effects?",
-      "description": "Review whether the implementation includes interactive elements (e.g., wind effect on hover, clicking to shake the tree) or environmental effects (e.g., gentle breeze causing occasional leaf falls, day/night cycle). Deduct 5 points if no interactivity exists and 3 points if interaction is minimal. Give 10 points for well-implemented interactivity that enhances the autumn experience.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common issues (browser compatibility, viewport resizing, performance optimization for animation). Code with strong robustness should adapt to different screen sizes, maintain performance with many animated elements, and use requestAnimationFrame for smooth animations. Give 10 points for excellent robustness, 5 for average, and 0 if major issues exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Weather effects like rain or wind 2. Sound effects synchronized with falling leaves 3. Seasonal progression from summer to winter). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant animation loops or event handlers 2. Elements unrelated to the autumn plant theme 3. Heavy effects that affect performance (e.g., too many particle systems). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating drawing, animation, and interaction logic), code reusability (e.g., functions to generate multiple leaves), and optimization techniques. Deduct 5 points if global variables pollute the namespace; deduct 5 points if there's high code duplication; deduct 5 points if no performance considerations exist for animations. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the visual design follows good principles: 1) Harmonious color palette appropriate for autumn 2) Balanced composition with proper negative space 3) Attention to detail in leaf shapes and plant structure. Deduct 3 points for visually jarring elements, 5 points for unrealistic proportions, and 5 points for poor composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the animation smooth and visually pleasing?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the animations follow natural principles: 1) Easing functions for realistic acceleration 2) Varied timing across different leaves 3) Smooth performance even with many elements. Deduct 5 points for jerky animations, 3 points for unrealistic movement patterns, and 5 points for performance issues with multiple leaves. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/listen-to-music-headphones-sound-quality.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 158,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes.\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code. Listen to music with headphones for better sound quality.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the SVG image properly constructed with accurate structure?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the SVG code has proper namespace declarations, viewport settings, and dimensioning. Check if the SVG element has width/height attributes or viewBox properly defined. Deduct 5 points if namespace is missing, 3 points for incorrect viewBox, and 2 points for missing responsive attributes. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the headphones accurately depicted in the SVG?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG correctly implements the headphone shape with appropriate paths, curves, and proportions. Score 3 points for basic shape outline, 5 points for detailed components (ear cups, headband, padding), and 10 points for a complete and accurate representation with proper depth and dimension.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the musical element/sound visualization properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess if the SVG includes visual elements representing music or sound (such as musical notes, sound waves, or visualizations). Check if these elements enhance the context of using headphones for better sound quality. Award 5 points for basic music symbols, 8 points for animated sound elements, and 10 points for comprehensive sound visualization that connects with the headphone concept.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the SVG include appropriate animations or interactivity?",
-      "description": "Examine if the SVG implements animations (such as pulsing sound waves, moving notes) or interactive elements (volume control, play/pause functionality). Score 3 points for basic CSS animations, 7 points for SMIL animations, and 10 points for sophisticated JavaScript-driven interactive elements that enhance the headphone/music concept.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles browser compatibility issues, includes fallbacks for unsupported features, and implements proper error handling for animations or interactions. Code with strong robustness should work across major browsers. Give 10 points if fully robust, 5 points for average robustness, and 0 points if major compatibility issues exist.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Sound visualization that changes with simulated audio intensity 2. User-interactive headphone color customization 3. Responsive design that adapts to different screen sizes). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant path definitions or duplicate elements 2. Unnecessary filters or effects that don't contribute to the headphone/music concept 3. Excessive animations that affect performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visualization is obscured by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (grouped elements, reusable components, clear naming conventions), optimized code (minimal path points, efficient use of SVG elements), and proper commenting. Deduct 5 points if SVG elements lack proper grouping; deduct 5 points if the code is unnecessarily verbose; deduct 5 points if there are no comments explaining complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG follows professional design principles: 1) Limited, harmonious color palette 2) Proper use of stroke widths and fills 3) Clear visual hierarchy and appropriate use of negative space. Deduct 3 points for jarring color combinations, 5 points for inconsistent styling, and 5 points for poor visual balance. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any animations or transitions in the SVG are smooth and natural: 1) Animations have appropriate easing 2) Transition durations feel natural (300-500ms) 3) Interactive elements provide clear visual feedback. Deduct 5 points for jerky animations, 3 points for inappropriate timing, and 5 points for confusing interaction states. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/magnet-attraction-metal-magnetic-science.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 201,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Magnet has attraction on metal due to magnetic science.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG magnet visualization implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Check if the code properly creates an SVG magnet with appropriate shapes, colors, and proportions. The classic horseshoe or bar magnet shape should be clearly recognizable with proper north/south poles indicated. Score 0 if no magnet is visualized, 5 if a basic shape is present but lacks detail, and 10 if the magnet is properly detailed with visual cues for polarity.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the code demonstrate magnetic attraction with metal objects?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a visual demonstration of magnetic attraction physics. Check for metal objects that respond to the magnet's proximity with appropriate movement behaviors. Deduct 5 points if attraction is static/predetermined instead of dynamic, and 3 points if the interaction radius isn't proportional to magnetic strength. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is there a magnetic field visualization?",
-      "description": "Assess if the code includes a visual representation of magnetic field lines showing the direction and intensity of the magnetic field (typically curved lines from north to south pole). Score 0 if no field lines exist, 5 if basic static field lines are present, and 10 if the field lines dynamically respond to movement or interaction with metal objects.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there an interactive component that demonstrates magnetic principles?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code allows user interaction (drag-and-drop functionality, mouse hover effects) that demonstrates magnetic science principles like attraction/repulsion based on polarity, distance-based field strength, or interaction between multiple magnets/metal objects. Deduct 5 points if interaction is limited to basic dragging without physics, and 3 points if educational aspects of magnetism aren't clearly conveyed. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser resize, rapid user interactions, out-of-bounds dragging, etc.) and provide friendly error handling or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Magnetic field strength visualization that changes with distance 2. Particle effects showing magnetic attraction 3. Educational tooltips explaining magnetic principles). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar magnetic effects 2. Function modules unrelated to magnetism demonstration 3. Fancy effects that affect performance without adding educational value about magnetism. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core magnetic demonstration is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating physics simulation/view/interaction layers), code organization, and efficiency of the implementation. Deduct 5 points if global variable pollution is found or proper event handling patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code is unnecessarily complex or has high duplication; deduct 5 points if the SVG implementation uses inefficient techniques. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional scientific visualization standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG visualization follows professional scientific visualization principles: 1) Accurate representation of magnetic phenomena 2) Clear visual distinction between magnets, metal objects, and field lines 3) Professional color scheme that aids understanding rather than confuses. Deduct 3 points for each inaccurate scientific representation, 5 points for confusing visual elements, and 5 points for poor color choices that hinder understanding. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and scientifically accurate?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the magnetic interactions conform to real physical principles: 1) Force calculations based on realistic magnetic formulas 2) Smooth animations for attraction/repulsion (60fps) 3) Accurate behavior of metal objects in magnetic fields. Deduct 5 points for each physically inaccurate behavior, 3 points for jerky animations during interactions, and 5 points for unrealistic object movements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/man-serving-tennis-silhouette-racquet.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 105,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate, professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable whenever possible.\nPlease help me implement this SVG image using code. A black and white silhouette of a man serving a ball in a game of tennis, holding a racquet in his hand.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes proper SVG declarations with correct namespace, viewBox settings, and appropriate canvas dimensions. The SVG should use the standard xmlns attribute and have reasonable width/height attributes or viewBox dimensions. Deduct 5 points if namespaces are missing, 3 points if viewBox is improperly set, and 5 points if dimensions make the image difficult to view or scale. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the tennis player silhouette accurately represented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the code creates a recognizable silhouette of a tennis player in a serving position. The figure should clearly show a person with arms extended holding a racquet in a serving pose. Deduct 5 points if the posture is anatomically incorrect, 7 points if the silhouette is not recognizable as a tennis player, and 3 points if proportions are significantly distorted. Score 0 if the silhouette is completely missing. The full score is 15 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the tennis racquet properly depicted in the player's hand?",
-      "description": "Review whether the tennis racquet is correctly positioned in the player's hand and has appropriate proportions. The racquet should be distinguishable with a handle and frame. Deduct 5 points if the racquet shape is unrealistic, 3 points if the position relative to the hand is incorrect, and 7 points if the racquet is missing or unrecognizable. The full score is 15 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the black and white silhouette effect properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code correctly implements a true silhouette effect with clean black fill and no unnecessary borders or gradients. The SVG should use appropriate fill attributes to create a solid black figure against a white/transparent background. Deduct 5 points for using gray instead of black, 3 points for adding unnecessary strokes, and 5 points if multiple colors are used instead of a true silhouette. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG implementation handles browser compatibility issues and includes fallback options. Deduct 3 points if browser-specific attributes are used without fallbacks, 5 points if the SVG doesn't include appropriate role or aria attributes for accessibility, and 5 points if there's no alternate content or title for screen readers. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Subtle animation of the serve motion 2. Interactive elements that respond to user input 3. Clean scaling without pixelation at different sizes). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary path points or shapes that add complexity without visual benefit 2. Excessive grouping elements (<g>) that don't serve a purpose 3. Unnecessarily complex gradient or filter effects that could be simplified. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core silhouette clarity is compromised by redundant code. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review code organization (such as meaningful element IDs, proper indentation, and logical grouping), optimization techniques (path simplification, appropriate decimal precision), and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if paths are excessively complex when simpler alternatives exist; deduct 3 points if precision is too high (causing bloated file size) or too low (causing visual artifacts); deduct 2 points if there's no logical organization of SVG elements. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the silhouette meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern SVG best practices: 1) Clean path definitions without unnecessary points 2) Proper use of basic shapes where appropriate rather than complex paths 3) Balanced visual weight and proportions. Deduct 3 points for jagged edges or non-smooth curves, 5 points for anatomically incorrect body proportions, and 5 points for poor negative space usage or awkward composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the SVG implementation optimized and efficient?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the SVG code is optimized for performance and file size: 1) Minimal use of unnecessary decimal places in coordinates 2) Use of appropriate SVG elements (basic shapes vs. paths) 3) Clean, minifiable code structure. Deduct 3 points for excessive precision in coordinates, 3 points for using paths where basic shapes would suffice, and 4 points for unnecessarily complex grouping or transformation matrices. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/metal-oil-barrel-petroleum.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 113,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the code you generate is executable for demonstration. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. The metal oil barrel contains petroleum.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the oil barrel visualization accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the SVG code properly renders a recognizable metal oil barrel with appropriate proportions (typical 55-gallon drum proportions of approximately 23\" diameter × 34\" height). The barrel should include key visual elements such as rim reinforcements at the top and bottom, side vertical ribbing if applicable, and proper cylindrical perspective. Score 0 if the barrel is unrecognizable, 5 if it's basic but identifiable, and 10 if it's detailed and realistic.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Does the petroleum representation meet visual accuracy?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the petroleum inside the barrel is visually represented with appropriate coloring (dark brown to black), possible shine or reflection effects, and any visible level indicators. If applicable, check if the filling level is visible through an open top or semi-transparent representation. Deduct 5 points if petroleum is missing entirely, 3 points if the coloring is incorrect (e.g., bright colors not resembling petroleum), and 2 points if there's no distinction between the barrel and its contents.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are material properties correctly represented?",
-      "description": "Assess if the metallic properties of the barrel are effectively conveyed through SVG techniques such as gradients, highlights, or shading that suggest a metal surface. Check for reflective properties, appropriate metal texture or pattern, and depth perception. For the petroleum, evaluate if its liquid properties are suggested through appropriate visual cues. Deduct 5 points for flat, non-metallic appearance and 5 points for petroleum lacking liquid visual characteristics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the SVG implementation technically efficient?",
-      "description": "Review the SVG code structure for proper use of SVG elements (paths, circles, rects, etc.), appropriate grouping (<g> elements), reuse of components where applicable, and optimal path definitions. Check if the implementation uses appropriate SVG features like gradients, patterns, or filters for visual effects rather than numerous overlapping elements. Deduct 5 points for excessive path points or shapes that could be simplified, and 5 points for missing SVG-specific optimizations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code uses proper SVG structure with correct namespaces, viewBox attributes, and element positioning. Check if the implementation works across different viewports and scales appropriately. The robust code should handle various display scenarios without breaking the visual representation. Give 10 points for highly robust code that scales well, 5 points for code that works in limited scenarios, and 0 points if the SVG implementation has fundamental structural issues.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Animation effects like liquid sloshing 2. Interactive elements that respond to user actions 3. Advanced SVG filters for realistic metal textures). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements performing the same visual function 2. Unnecessary nested groups or transforms that complicate the structure 3. Overly complex effects that don't contribute to the oil barrel visualization. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visualization is compromised by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular structure (such as separating barrel, petroleum, and effects into logical groups), code reusability, and naming conventions. Deduct 5 points if global attributes are scattered rather than consolidated; deduct 5 points if there's significant repeated code that could be templated; deduct 5 points if element IDs/classes are missing or poorly named. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Appropriate color palette that realistically represents metal and petroleum 2) Proper use of negative space within the SVG canvas 3) Professional proportions and perspective. Deduct 3 points for each unrealistic visual element, 5 points for implausible color combinations, and 5 points for perspective errors. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless (if implemented)?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any included animations or interactions (if present) enhance the visualization: 1) Smooth transitions or effects with appropriate timing 2) Performance-optimized animations that don't cause rendering issues 3) Purposeful interactions that add value to the visualization. Deduct 5 points for each jerky animation, 3 points for purely decorative interactions that don't enhance understanding, and 5 points for interactions that interfere with the main visualization. If no animations/interactions are implemented, evaluate whether static visual cues effectively suggest the material properties and contents. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/minecraft-end-city-drawing-code.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1377,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code when possible. Write code that can be input on a computer to create a drawing of an End City from Minecraft.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the End City structure visualized with accurate architectural elements?",
-      "description": "Verify if the code correctly implements key End City elements from Minecraft including: 1) The tall, purple-hued towers with end stone brick textures, 2) The distinctive overhanging 'ship' structures, 3) Proper proportions with vertical pillars and horizontal platforms, and 4) End rod decorations. Score 0 if no recognizable End City features are present, 5 if basic structure is implemented but missing key details, and 10 if all distinctive End City architectural elements are accurately represented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the purpur block texture and color scheme properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the code implements the iconic End City color palette and textures. Check for: 1) Accurate purpur block coloration (proper purple hue #9C77B8), 2) End stone brick patterns with appropriate light yellow coloration, 3) Correct implementation of end rod lighting elements (white/light blue glow), and 4) Purple and magenta shulker representations if included. Deduct 3 points for each major color/texture inaccuracy, with at least 3 points if basic purple theming is present.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the code implement appropriate dimensionality and perspective?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code creates a proper 3D representation of the End City (either through isometric, perspective projection, or full 3D rendering). The rendering should: 1) Show depth through shading or perspective, 2) Implement proper occlusion (closer objects hiding farther ones), 3) Maintain consistent scale proportions across the structure. Score 0 for flat 2D with no depth cues, 5 for basic perspective with minor inconsistencies, and 10 for technically accurate 3D representation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the End Ship feature properly implemented (if included)?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes the iconic End Ship that accompanies End Cities. Check for: 1) Proper ship hull shape with purpur blocks, 2) Dragon head figurehead at the bow, 3) Mast structure with brewing stand or equivalent, 4) Proper positioning floating near a tower. Award 0 points if no ship is included when it should be a central feature, 5 points if a basic ship structure exists but lacks detail, and 10 points for a complete and accurate End Ship implementation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser resizing, varying screen sizes, or potential rendering errors) and provides appropriate fallbacks. Code with strong robustness should work across modern browsers, adapt to different viewport sizes, and handle initialization errors gracefully. Give 10 points for exceptional error handling and adaptability, 5 points for average robustness, and 0 points if the visualization breaks easily under minor variations.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive rotation/zoom controls 2. Animated shulkers opening/closing 3. Day/night lighting cycle 4. Animated end rods with particle effects 5. Ability to customize colors or structure). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar rendering functions (e.g., multiple ways to draw the same block type) 2. Function modules unrelated to the End City visualization (e.g., unrelated Minecraft biomes or structures) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance severely (e.g., excessive particle systems that cause lag). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visualization is interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating rendering logic/geometry creation/texturing), reusable function patterns, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global namespace pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if rendering optimization is poor (e.g., redrawing unchanging elements repeatedly). The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual implementation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows Minecraft's visual style while maintaining professional quality: 1) Consistent block textures with appropriate level of detail (not overly simplified or unnecessarily complex) 2) Proper lighting and shading to enhance depth perception 3) Clear structural organization without visual clutter. Deduct 3 points for each inconsistency with Minecraft's established visual language, 5 points for poor lighting that flattens the image, and 5 points for chaotic or cluttered layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the rendering performance and responsiveness optimized?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the code is optimized for rendering performance: 1) Initial loading and rendering time under 3 seconds on average hardware 2) Smooth interaction if any interactive elements are present 3) Efficient use of drawing methods appropriate to the implementation (canvas optimization, WebGL where appropriate, or optimized SVG/DOM manipulation). Deduct 5 points for noticeable lag during rendering, 3 points for inefficient drawing approaches that could be optimized, and 5 points if the implementation fails on mobile devices when adaptability would be reasonable. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/music-cassette-tape-player-svg.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 86,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and expert responses. Make sure that the code you provide is executable for demonstration. Please help me implement this SVG image using code. Music is played on a cassette tape.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic SVG structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code includes proper SVG structure with appropriate namespaces, viewport dimensions, and responsive design considerations. The SVG should have a well-defined viewBox for scaling. Deduct 5 points if namespace declarations are missing, 5 points if viewBox is incorrectly defined, and 3 points if responsive attributes are absent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the cassette tape visually accurate and detailed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the cassette tape is accurately represented with proper proportions and all key components (case, reels, tape, label area, etc.). Deduct 3 points for each missing critical component, 5 points if the proportions are significantly off, and 2 points if fine details like screw holes or write-protection notches are missing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the music visualization appropriately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review how music is visually represented in the context of the cassette tape. Check if there are visual elements that convincingly represent music playing (e.g., animated tape movement between reels, equalizer bars, sound waves). Deduct 5 points if no music visualization is present, 3 points if the visualization is static rather than animated, and 2 points if the visualization doesn't logically connect to the cassette concept. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the animation smooth and relevant to cassette tape functionality?",
-      "description": "Judge if the animations (tape movement, reels rotating, etc.) match the realistic mechanics of a cassette tape. The animation should run at an appropriate speed and include proper easing functions. Deduct 5 points for jerky animations, 3 points for physically inaccurate movements, and 3 points if no animation timing control is implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as browser compatibility issues, responsive scaling, performance optimization for animations). Code with strong robustness should implement proper error handling and fallbacks. Deduct 3 points for each unhandled edge case, 5 points for browser-specific code without alternatives, and 5 points for performance issues with animations. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Interactive controls to play/pause/fast-forward 2. Realistic tape counter 3. Sound visualization effects synchronized with actual audio playback). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant SVG elements that could be grouped or reused 2. Excessive detail that compromises performance 3. Fancy effects unrelated to cassette tape functionality. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core visual representation is obscured by unnecessary elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular organization (such as separating static elements from animated ones), reusability of components, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if elements that should be grouped are scattered; deduct 5 points if repetitive code is used instead of loops or functions for similar elements; deduct 5 points if there are no comments explaining complex parts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual design meet professional standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern SVG best practices: 1) Appropriate use of gradients, shadows, and highlights for realistic appearance 2) Proper proportion and perspective 3) Thoughtful color palette that creates a cohesive look. Deduct 3 points for flat, unrealistic rendering, 5 points for inconsistent light source/shadows, and 5 points for poor use of color theory. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the interaction design intuitive and engaging?",
-      "description": "Judge whether user interactions (if implemented) follow intuitive patterns: 1) Clear visual feedback for interactive elements 2) Appropriate hover/click states 3) Logical connection between interactions and cassette functionality. Deduct 5 points for unclear interaction targets, 3 points for missing visual feedback, and 5 points for unintuitive control mechanisms. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/svg_generation-svg_images/musician-playing-hexagonal-accordion-polka-sounds.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 167,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration.\n\nPlease help me implement the following requirements using SVG code. The requirement is to create: a musician playing an accordion, a folk music keyboard instrument used on the hexagonal accordion, producing polka sounds.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the musician's figure properly drawn using SVG?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG implementation accurately depicts a human figure playing an accordion. Check if the musician has proper body proportions, clear facial features, and a realistic posture that demonstrates accordion playing. Deduct 3 points if the figure lacks detail, 5 points if the posture is anatomically incorrect, and 7 points if the musician is barely recognizable. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the accordion correctly represented with accurate structural details?",
-      "description": "Check if the accordion has the proper hexagonal button layout (as specified in the requirements), bellows structure, and keyboard components. The accordion should have both treble and bass sides with visible buttons/keys. Deduct 5 points if the accordion lacks a hexagonal button layout, 5 points if the bellows are missing or poorly represented, and 3 points if the instrument proportions are significantly incorrect. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the interaction between the musician and the accordion realistic?",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the SVG shows the relationship between the performer and the instrument. The hands should be correctly positioned on the keyboard and bellows, with proper finger placement for playing. Deduct 3 points if hand positioning is unrealistic, 5 points if the hands don't connect with the accordion properly, and 7 points if the musician doesn't appear to be actually playing the instrument. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Does the implementation include animation representing accordion playing?",
-      "description": "Review whether the SVG includes animations that show the accordion being played - specifically bellows movement (expanding/contracting) and possibly finger movement on the buttons. Score 0 if no animation exists, 5 if only basic bellows animation is implemented, and 10 if there are comprehensive animations including finger movements, bellows action, and possibly even visual cues for the polka sound production. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the SVG code is well-structured, uses proper namespaces, and follows best practices. Check if the code uses groups (<g>) appropriately, implements proper viewBox settings, and has responsive scaling. Deduct 3 points for missing viewBox attributes, 3 points for hardcoded dimensions without scaling considerations, and 4 points for improper element organization. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Sound integration when interacting with the accordion 2. Visual music notes emanating during play 3. Interactive elements allowing users to press accordion buttons). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Unnecessary visual elements unrelated to the musician or accordion 2. Duplicate SVG elements that could be reused with transforms 3. Over-complicated effects that make the file size unnecessarily large. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core representation is obscured by redundant elements.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as proper grouping of SVG components), code reuse, and naming conventions. Check if similar elements use <defs> and <use> elements appropriately. Deduct 5 points if there's excessive repetition of similar shapes, 3 points for inconsistent or missing element IDs/classes, and 2 points for poor organization of the SVG structure. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the visual representation meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme appropriate for folk music context 2) Proper proportions and visual weight 3) Attention to detail in both musician and instrument. Deduct 3 points for clashing colors, 3 points for inconsistent style between elements, and 4 points for poor overall composition or perspective issues. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and realistic?",
-      "description": "Judge whether any animations or interactive elements feel natural and aligned with real accordion playing: 1) Bellows movement timed appropriately 2) Button/key depressions synced with playing 3) Any visual representation of music or sound should match accordion movements. Deduct 3 points for jerky animations, 3 points for unrealistic timing, and 4 points for interactions that contradict how an accordion actually works. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "SVG Generation-SVG Images",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}