@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/wechat-mini-program-running-track-recorder.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1560,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to ensure the generated code is executable for demonstration. I want to create a WeChat mini program for recording running tracks, called \"Running Circle.\" The track color will be determined by the pace speed. It will use cloud development. Please provide me with the complete code for this mini program.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core GPS tracking functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code accurately implements real-time GPS tracking with appropriate positioning accuracy settings. Check if it handles different GPS states (high/low accuracy, no signal) and contains power optimization strategies. Score 0 if GPS tracking isn't implemented, 5 if basic tracking works but lacks error handling, and 10 if it includes comprehensive tracking with proper error handling and optimization.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the pace-based track coloring system implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes algorithms to calculate pace (min/km) in real-time and applies appropriate color mapping based on pace thresholds. Check if color transitions are smooth and if the system handles edge cases like extremely slow/fast paces or GPS jumps. Deduct 5 points if pace calculation is inaccurate, 3 points if color mapping is simplistic or hard-coded, and 2 points if there's no visual feedback during running.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the WeChat cloud development integration complete?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code properly utilizes WeChat cloud services for storing run data, user authentication, and sharing functionality. Check if it implements proper data synchronization between local storage and cloud databases. Deduct 5 points if cloud storage isn't implemented, 3 points if authentication is missing, and 3 points if there's no offline support with synchronization logic.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the run session lifecycle management properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code handles the complete lifecycle of a run session: preparation, start, pause/resume, completion, and summary. Check if it properly manages background/foreground transitions and includes mechanisms to prevent accidental data loss. Deduct 5 points if pause/resume functionality is missing, 3 points if background tracking isn't handled properly, and 2 points if run completion lacks proper validation or summary.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as GPS signal loss, battery optimization interference, accidental app closure, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-generated running insights 2. Social sharing with customizable post templates 3. Integration with music apps for run soundtrack 4. Gamification elements like achievements or challenges). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple location tracking methods used simultaneously) 2. Function modules unrelated to running tracking (e.g., unnecessary social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance and battery life (e.g., constant animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating tracking logic/UI/cloud service layers), component reusability, and mini program best practices. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or if the code doesn't follow WeChat mini program development standards; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no error logging or performance monitoring. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern WeChat mini program design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Consistent with WeChat's design language. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic map-UI integration. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Start/stop button feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Map updates at minimum 1Hz during activity 3) Smooth transition between different screens 4) Intuitive gestures for map manipulation. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy map rendering during tracking, and 5 points for hard-to-reach controls during running. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/word-memorization-flashcards.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 439,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Ensure that the generated code is executable for demonstration. The task is to: implement a program that can identify words in a file, sort them, provide translations and example sentences for each word, and then help me generate an interactive HTML page with flashcards to aid word memorization.\n\n1. The page should be aesthetically pleasing, concise and intuitive, with 3D-rotating word cards and a button below to randomly switch to the next word\n2. Interactive buttons should function properly with a reasonable layout without any overlapping elements\n3. All words must be included, generated completely at once, without omissions",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the word identification and extraction functionality implemented correctly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can accurately extract all unique words from a text file, ignoring punctuation and case sensitivity. Check if it properly handles special cases like contractions, hyphenated words, and various encodings. Score 0 if word extraction is missing, 5 if basic extraction exists but with edge case issues, 10 if comprehensive with proper text processing techniques.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the word sorting functionality implemented properly?",
-      "description": "Check if words are sorted alphabetically or by other meaningful criteria (frequency, length, etc.). Verify that the sorting algorithm handles all edge cases like non-ASCII characters and is efficient for large word lists. Score 0 if sorting is missing, 5 if basic sorting exists but with issues, 10 if properly implemented with clear sorting logic.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Are translations and example sentences provided for each word?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes mechanisms to fetch translations and contextual example sentences (either through an API, embedded database, or other sources). Verify that translations are relevant and example sentences demonstrate proper word usage. Score 0 if missing, 5 if only translations exist without examples, 10 if both are comprehensively implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the 3D-rotating flashcard visualization implemented effectively?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly implements 3D-rotating animations for the flashcards using CSS 3D transforms or JavaScript libraries. Check if the rotation reveals the word, translation, and example sentence in an intuitive manner. Score 0 if rotation is missing, 5 if basic rotation exists but appears janky or incomplete, 10 if smooth, natural rotation with proper perspective is achieved.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as empty files, extremely large word lists, network issues when fetching translations, invalid input formats, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the learning experience (e.g., 1. Word pronunciation audio 2. Difficulty categorization for spaced repetition 3. Progress tracking system 4. Visual word associations/mnemonics). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple sorting methods without purpose) 2. Function modules unrelated to vocabulary learning (e.g., built-in games not tied to word memorization) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., complex animations that slow page loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating data processing/UI rendering/user interaction logic), code reusability, and maintainability. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the code lacks comments or documentation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Card flip/rotation animations complete within 500-800ms 2) Random word selection responds within 100ms 3) Clear visual cues for interactive elements. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jerky animations, and 5 points if the random word selection button is not prominently displayed or easily accessible. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "easy"
-}

package/library/web_applications-education_learning/zhejiang-high-school-chemistry-quiz-software.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1525,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable for demonstration purposes. Please help create a quiz training software for the Chemistry Academic Level Qualification Examination (Academic Assessment) for first-year high school students in Zhejiang Province, focusing on multiple-choice questions.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core quiz functionality implemented effectively?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements the multiple-choice question system for Chemistry, including question presentation, answer selection, and result evaluation. Check if questions are correctly structured with chemistry-specific content (e.g., chemical formulas, reactions, principles). Score 0 if core functionality is missing, 5 if basic quiz features exist but lack chemistry specificity, and 10 if the system fully accommodates chemistry content with proper formatting.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the question database comprehensive and relevant to the Chemistry Academic Level Qualification Examination?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the implemented question database covers key topics from the Zhejiang Province first-year high school chemistry curriculum (e.g., atomic structure, periodic table, chemical bonds, basic reactions). Check for question variety and difficulty levels that match academic assessment standards. Deduct 5 points if topics are too generic, 5 points if content doesn't align with curriculum requirements, and 3 points if question variety is insufficient. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the application include performance analysis and learning progress tracking?",
-      "description": "Check for implementation of statistical analysis of student performance, including tracking correct/incorrect answers, time spent, difficulty assessment, and identifying knowledge gaps. Evaluate whether the system provides detailed feedback with explanations for wrong answers and suggests areas for improvement. Deduct 5 points if only basic scoring exists without analysis, and 3 points if feedback lacks educational value. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there an adaptive learning mechanism implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the application adapts question difficulty based on user performance, implements spaced repetition for previously missed questions, and personalizes the learning path. Check if the algorithm effectively identifies and prioritizes weak areas. Deduct 5 points if questions appear randomly without adaptation, 3 points if the system lacks personalization features, and 3 points if there's no mechanism to reinforce difficult concepts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid inputs, submission errors, data loading failures, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases like disconnections during quiz submission or corrupted question data. Give 10 points if exception handling is comprehensive, 5 points if basic error handling exists, and 0 points if exceptions are unmanaged.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance learning (e.g., 1. Interactive molecular visualization for chemistry concepts 2. Voice-enabled question reading for accessibility 3. Chemistry formula editor/validator 4. AR-based molecular structure visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple scoring systems operating in parallel) 2. Function modules unrelated to chemistry learning (e.g., games not tied to educational content) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations slowing question loading). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating question data/UI/logic layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Check if chemistry-specific content rendering (formulas, equations) is properly abstracted. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern educational software principles: 1) Harmonious color matching appropriate for extended study sessions (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing with clear question/answer distinction 3) Professional font system with proper rendering of chemistry notations and formulas (subscripts, superscripts, special symbols). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for poorly rendered chemical formulas. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interface interactions support effective learning: 1) Question navigation response time ≤ 100ms 2) Clear visual feedback for answer selection 3) Smooth transitions between questions without disrupting concentration. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for laggy transitions between questions, and 5 points for confusing navigation that could disrupt the learning flow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Education/Learning",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-entertainment/anime-website-creation.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1753,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure that the code you produce is executable for display. Help me create an anime website.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the basic website structure properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the HTML5 structure includes semantic tags (header, nav, main, section, footer), proper DOCTYPE declaration, and responsive meta tags. Check if the CSS follows a logical organization (reset/normalize, variables, components, layouts). Score 0 if the structure is chaotic, 5 if basic elements are present but poorly organized, and 10 if the structure is clean, semantic, and follows best practices.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the anime catalog and browsing functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate the implementation of the anime catalog with filtering, sorting, and search capabilities. Check if the catalog displays essential information (title, cover image, rating, genres, release year) and provides pagination or infinite scrolling. Deduct 5 points if search functionality is missing, 3 points if filtering is limited, and 2 points if sorting options are inadequate. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the anime detail page and media player properly designed?",
-      "description": "Assess the detail page for comprehensive anime information (synopsis, episodes, characters, related anime) and a functional video player with essential controls (play/pause, volume, fullscreen, quality options). Score 0 if the detail page or player is missing, 5 if they exist but lack essential features, and 10 if both are fully featured and well-integrated.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is there a user system with personalization features?",
-      "description": "Check for user authentication (signup/login), profile management, and personalization features such as watchlists, favorites, and watch history. Evaluate if the system includes recommendation algorithms based on user preferences. Deduct 5 points if authentication is insecure, 3 points if personalization features are missing, and 2 points if recommendations are not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as failed API requests, missing images, slow network connections, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Check for input validation, error handling for API calls, and fallback content. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Dark/light theme toggle 2. Seasonal anime calendar visualization 3. Character relationship graphs 4. Episode screenshot previews 5. Voice actor profiles with other works). Add 2 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple carousel components with different code) 2. Function modules unrelated to anime website (e.g., news ticker unrelated to anime) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive parallax effects or animations). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as component-based architecture, separation of concerns), state management implementation, code reusability, and build process. Deduct 5 points if global state is managed poorly; deduct 3 points if components are tightly coupled; deduct 2 points if the code duplication rate is high (over 30%). Check for proper use of async/await or Promises for API calls. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the design follows modern anime website aesthetics: 1) Cohesive color scheme aligned with anime themes 2) Proper card layouts with consistent spacing (8px grid system) 3) Typography hierarchy with readable fonts (min 14px for body text) 4) Appropriate use of imagery and thumbnails. Deduct 3 points for cluttered layouts, 4 points for poor visual hierarchy, and 3 points for inconsistent styling across pages. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects enhance user experience: 1) Page transitions under 300ms 2) Loading states for async operations 3) Hover/click animations that provide feedback 4) Smooth scrolling behavior 5) Mobile touch gestures support. Deduct 3 points for jarring transitions between pages, 3 points for missing loading indicators, 2 points for unresponsive UI elements, and 2 points for poor mobile interaction design. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Web Visuals",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-entertainment/genshin-impact-gacha-simulation.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 824,
-  "question": "You are a coding expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable and demonstrable. Create a web application code that simulates Genshin Impact's gacha system, resembling the in-game wishing interface, complete with animations and character images.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the gacha core mechanism accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code correctly implements the gacha probability system with proper rarity distribution (5-star ~0.6%, 4-star ~5.1%, 3-star ~94.3%), pity system (hard pity at 90 pulls for 5-star, 10 pulls for 4-star), and soft pity mechanism (increased rates after 74 pulls). Score 0 if basic probability is missing, 5 if only simple random is implemented, and 10 if all gacha mechanics including guaranteed systems are fully accurate.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the wishing interface animation system complete?",
-      "description": "Check whether the implementation includes authentic gacha animations: shooting star effects, character reveal animations, rarity-based lighting effects (golden for 5-star, purple for 4-star), and smooth transition sequences. Evaluate if the animation timing matches the original game experience (3-5 seconds per pull). Deduct 5 points if animations are choppy or missing, 3 points if color schemes don't match rarity standards. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the character/weapon database and display system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the system includes a comprehensive database of characters and weapons with proper categorization, rarity classification, and detailed information display. Check if character portraits, weapon images, and descriptions are properly integrated. Deduct 5 points if image loading is slow or broken, 3 points if character information is incomplete or inaccurate. Full score requires proper data structure and seamless asset management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the banner system and wish history tracking implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes multiple banner types (character event, weapon event, standard), proper banner rotation mechanism, and comprehensive wish history tracking with detailed statistics. Evaluate if pity counters are accurately maintained across different banner types. Deduct 5 points if banner switching is not functional, 3 points if history data is not persistent. Full score requires complete banner management system.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures, invalid user inputs, animation interruptions, data corruption, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle edge cases like rapid clicking during animations or browser refresh during pulls, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the gacha experience (e.g., 1. Constellation/refinement tracking system 2. Pull prediction and statistics dashboard 3. Custom banner creation tools 4. Social sharing of rare pulls 5. Achievement system for milestones). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple random number generators) 2. Function modules unrelated to gacha simulation (e.g., built-in chat system) 3. Excessive visual effects that impact performance (e.g., overly complex particle systems). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core gacha functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating gacha logic/UI components/data management), proper state management, and code organization. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or no design patterns are used; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 3 points if asset loading is not optimized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows Genshin Impact's visual style: 1) Authentic color palette matching the game's theme 2) Proper spacing and layout following game UI conventions 3) Appropriate typography and iconography 4) Consistent visual hierarchy. Deduct 3 points for each element that breaks visual consistency, 5 points for poor color harmony that doesn't match the game aesthetic, and 5 points for cluttered layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the gacha interactions feel authentic and responsive: 1) Wish button response time ≤ 100ms 2) Animation sequences flow naturally without stuttering 3) Smooth transitions between different UI states 4) Proper audio-visual feedback synchronization 5) Intuitive navigation and controls. Deduct 5 points for each laggy animation, 3 points for missing interaction feedback, and 5 points for confusing user flow. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Game Development-Casual",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-entertainment/music-player-app-with-online-playback-and-api.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 575,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable when possible. Create a music player application where users can search for songs, create playlists, play, pause, and switch between songs. Song data should be retrieved through a music API, and the application should support online playback and display song covers, artist information, etc. The playback progress should update in real-time.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the music API integration and data management fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code properly integrates with music APIs (such as Spotify, Apple Music, or similar services) with proper authentication handling, rate limiting, and error responses. Check if song metadata (title, artist, album, duration, cover art) is correctly parsed and cached. Evaluate data structure design for efficient storage and retrieval of track information. Score 0 if API integration is missing, 5 if basic search is implemented but lacks metadata handling, and 10 if comprehensive API integration with proper error handling and caching is present.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the playlist management system comprehensively designed?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements complete playlist functionality including creation, deletion, modification, and persistence of playlists. Evaluate if drag-and-drop reordering, duplicate detection, and playlist sharing capabilities are included. Review local storage or database integration for playlist persistence across sessions. Deduct 3 points if playlist operations lack undo functionality, 5 points if persistence is not implemented, and 2 points if drag-and-drop interactions are missing. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the audio playback engine robust and feature-complete?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the audio playback system supports seamless transitions between tracks, proper buffering strategies, and crossfade capabilities. Check if the player handles various audio formats, implements proper preloading for next tracks, and manages memory efficiently during long listening sessions. Review real-time progress updates with millisecond precision and seek functionality. Deduct 5 points if buffering causes frequent interruptions, 3 points if seek operations are imprecise, and 5 points if memory leaks occur during extended playback. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the search and discovery functionality intelligent and responsive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the search implementation includes autocomplete, search history, advanced filtering (by artist, album, genre, year), and fuzzy matching capabilities. Evaluate if search results are paginated efficiently and include relevant metadata. Review if the system implements search result caching and provides search suggestions. Give 10 points if all features are implemented with sub-200ms response times, 5 points if basic search works but lacks advanced features, and 0 points if search functionality is non-functional or extremely slow.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as network failures during streaming, invalid API responses, corrupted audio files, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should gracefully handle API rate limits, network timeouts, and audio loading failures. Give 10 points if comprehensive error handling is present, 5 points if basic error handling exists, and 0 points if no exception handling is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the music experience (e.g., 1. Real-time audio visualization/spectrum analyzer 2. Lyrics synchronization with playback 3. Smart playlist generation based on listening history 4. Social sharing of currently playing tracks 5. Equalizer with custom presets 6. Sleep timer and alarm integration). Add 2-3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple audio context instances, duplicate playlist logic) 2. Function modules unrelated to music playback (e.g., built-in games, unrelated social features) 3. Performance-heavy effects that don't enhance user experience (e.g., excessive visual effects during playback). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core music functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating audio engine/UI components/API services), proper state management, and build process automation. Check for proper TypeScript usage, component reusability, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if global audio state pollution is found or audio context is not properly managed; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process lacks optimization for audio assets. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional music app design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern music app design principles: 1) Harmonious color scheme that complements album artwork 2) Proper visual hierarchy with clear focus on currently playing track 3) Professional typography system with readable artist/track information 4) Consistent iconography for playback controls. Deduct 3 points for each cluttered interface element, 5 points for poor contrast affecting readability, and 5 points if the design doesn't adapt well to different album artwork colors. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and intuitive for music playback?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the interactive elements conform to music app standards: 1) Playback control responsiveness ≤ 50ms 2) Smooth progress bar scrubbing with real-time preview 3) Intuitive gesture controls (swipe for next/previous track) 4) Visual feedback for all user actions 5) Smooth transitions between different app states (search, playlist, now playing). Deduct 5 points for each unresponsive control, 3 points for jerky progress bar animations, and 5 points if key music controls are hard to access during playback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Audio Editing",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/web_applications-entertainment/vue-3-local-music-card-layout-modern-ui.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1113,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable when possible. Please help me design a local music page using Vue 3, with a card-based layout and modern, minimalist, and aesthetically pleasing UI. Also explain what features it includes.\n\n```vue\n<template>\n  <div>\n    <h1>Local Music</h1>\n  </div>\n</template>\n\n<script setup lang=\"ts\">\n\n</script>\n\n<style scoped>\n\n</style>",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the card-based layout fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a proper card-based layout for displaying music items with appropriate spacing, shadows, and responsive design. Check if the cards have proper hover effects, click interactions, and consistent sizing. Score 0 if there's no card implementation at all, 5 if basic card structure exists but lacks visual refinement, and 10 if a complete, polished card system is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are music playback controls implemented?",
-      "description": "Review the implementation of essential music player controls (play, pause, skip, volume, progress bar). Check if the audio is managed properly with Vue refs and if the UI state reflects playback status accurately. Deduct 3 points if progress tracking is missing, 3 points if volume control is absent, and 4 points if play/pause functionality is not implemented. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is local file access and handling implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess how the application handles local file access, including file selection, metadata extraction (artist, album, duration), and storage of user preferences. Check for file type validation and error handling when dealing with unsupported formats. Award 10 points for complete implementation with proper error handling, 5 points if basic file selection works but lacks metadata extraction, 0 points if local file access is not implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the music library management system implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code includes features for organizing music (playlists, favorites, sorting, filtering, search). Check if state management is properly implemented using Vue's reactivity system. Deduct 3 points if sorting/filtering is missing, 3 points if search functionality is absent, and 4 points if there's no playlist management. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as corrupted audio files, browser storage limitations, user operation errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Audio visualization 2. Lyrics synchronization 3. Audio equalizer 4. Sleep timer). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple volume control mechanisms) 2. Function modules unrelated to music playback (e.g., unnecessary social sharing features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive animations that impact playback). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review Vue 3 Composition API usage, component structure, TypeScript type safety, and proper event handling. Check for proper separation of concerns and reusable components. Deduct 5 points if prop drilling is used instead of provide/inject or proper state management; deduct 3 points if TypeScript types are missing or incorrect; deduct 2 points if component cohesion is poor. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern, minimalist UI principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance for currently playing tracks. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast scrolling, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Entertainment",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/web_applications-entertainment/web-based-intelligent-music-player-with-scheduled-playlists.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1285,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you generate is executable and displayable. Create a web-based intelligent music player that can automatically add playlists for different times and play the scheduled music when the time arrives. Please provide detailed implementation process and complete code.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the core music playback system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements HTML5 Audio API or Web Audio API for music playback, including play/pause, volume control, progress tracking, and playlist management. Check if it supports multiple audio formats (MP3, WAV, OGG) and includes proper audio loading states. Score 0 if basic playback is not functional, 5 if only simple play/pause works, and 10 if all core audio features including seamless track transitions are implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the intelligent scheduling system properly designed?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the time-based scheduling mechanism uses accurate timing APIs (setInterval/setTimeout or Web Workers for precision). Check if it includes timezone handling, schedule conflict resolution, and persistent storage of scheduled playlists. Deduct 5 points if scheduling accuracy exceeds ±30 seconds, 3 points if timezone issues aren't handled, and 5 points if schedules don't persist after browser refresh. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the automatic playlist generation algorithm effective?",
-      "description": "Check whether the system implements intelligent playlist creation based on time context (morning, afternoon, evening, night) with appropriate music categorization logic. Evaluate if it includes music metadata analysis, mood-based selection, or learning from user preferences. Deduct 5 points if playlists are randomly generated without context awareness, 3 points if music categorization is overly simplistic. Full score requires sophisticated algorithmic playlist generation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the complete music library management system constructed?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code includes comprehensive music library features: file upload/import, metadata editing, search/filter functionality, and playlist organization. Check for drag-and-drop support, bulk operations, and music file validation. Deduct 5 points if file management is basic, 3 points if search functionality is missing, and 5 points if no bulk operations are supported. Give 10 points if fully implemented with advanced library management.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as corrupted audio files, network interruption, invalid time inputs, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Audio visualization/spectrum analyzer 2. Smart crossfade between tracks 3. Voice control integration 4. Sleep timer with fade-out 5. Social sharing of playlists). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple audio players coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to music playing (e.g., built-in games or social media feeds) 3. Fancy effects that affect audio performance (e.g., heavy visual effects during playback). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core music functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating audio engine/UI/scheduling/storage layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern music player design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching with proper contrast for readability 2) Intuitive music controls layout (standard play/pause/skip positioning) 3) Professional typography for song titles and metadata (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times) 4) Proper album artwork display. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for poor color contrast affecting usability, and 5 points for chaotic music information layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to music player UX standards: 1) Audio control feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Progress bar scrubbing is responsive and accurate 3) Volume slider transitions are smooth 4) Track switching animations are seamless 5) Schedule notifications are non-intrusive. Deduct 5 points for each laggy audio control response, 3 points for jerky progress bar interactions, and 5 points for disruptive notification behavior. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Web Applications-Entertainment",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}