@getollie/cli 0.0.4 → 0.2.0

package/library/multimedia_editing-video_production/web-based-video-editing-tool.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 981,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be sure to provide executable code whenever possible. Can you help me generate code for a web-based video editing tool?\n\nHTML web version\nFunctional requirements:\n- Ability to upload videos\n- Automatic video editing\n- Save videos\n- Text-to-speech with popular streamer voices\n- Automatic subtitle extraction",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the video upload and processing functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements multi-format video upload (MP4, AVI, MOV, WebM) with proper file validation, progress tracking, and preview generation. Check if video metadata extraction (duration, resolution, codec) is included and if chunked upload for large files is supported. Score 0 if basic upload is missing, 5 if only simple upload works, and 10 if all formats are supported with robust error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the automatic video editing engine properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the automatic editing includes intelligent scene detection, transition effects, and timeline management. Check if the system can perform cuts, trims, and arrange clips automatically based on content analysis. Must include video rendering pipeline and export functionality. Deduct 5 points if no timeline visualization, 3 points if rendering is unstable. Full score requires AI-powered editing suggestions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the text-to-speech with voice cloning accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the TTS system includes multiple voice models, proper audio synthesis, and voice quality controls. Evaluate if popular streamer voice simulation is implemented with acceptable quality (>80% similarity). Must include audio waveform visualization and timing synchronization with video. Deduct 5 points if voice quality is poor, 3 points if no voice selection options.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the automatic subtitle extraction and synchronization system complete?",
-      "description": "Review whether the subtitle system uses speech recognition APIs (Web Speech API or external services) with accurate timing synchronization. Check if subtitle editing, styling (fonts, colors, positioning), and export formats (SRT, VTT) are supported. Must include real-time preview and manual correction capabilities. Deduct 5 points if timing is off by >500ms, 3 points if no styling options.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (large file uploads, unsupported formats, network interruption, memory limitations, browser compatibility issues) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle edge cases with graceful degradation, giving 10 points. If robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-powered thumbnail generation 2. Real-time collaboration editing 3. Social media format optimization 4. Background music auto-sync 5. Voice emotion detection). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple video players coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to video editing (e.g., built-in games or social features) 3. Performance-heavy effects that don't add value (e.g., excessive animations during rendering). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (separating video processing/UI/storage layers), proper error handling, and performance optimization. Check for memory management during video processing and proper cleanup of resources. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution or poor separation of concerns; deduct 5 points if code duplication rate exceeds 30%; deduct 5 points if no performance optimization for large video files. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the video editing interface follows professional video editing software standards: 1) Clear timeline visualization with proper scaling 2) Intuitive tool placement and iconography 3) Proper contrast ratios for video preview 4) Consistent spacing following 8px grid system 5) Professional color scheme suitable for long editing sessions. Deduct 3 points for each cluttered UI element, 5 points for poor video preview quality, and 5 points for confusing navigation. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether video editing interactions are responsive and professional: 1) Video scrubbing responds within 100ms 2) Timeline drag-and-drop operations are smooth 3) Preview playback has no stuttering 4) Export progress is clearly indicated 5) Tool switching provides immediate feedback. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for unclear loading states, and 5 points for missing keyboard shortcuts for common operations. Full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Video Production",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/multimedia_editing-video_production/web-dynamic-graphic-video-tool.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 620,
-  "question": "You are a code expert, please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for display whenever possible. ======== ROLE ========\nYou are an experienced code expert. Given a software development requirement description, you are required to generate project code based on the project requirements. Strictly follow the rules to help users generate the complete project code with simple and easy-to-understand language comments. Do not output anything else.\n\n======== OUTPUT RULES ========\n1. You will always generate complete, runnable project code. Please ensure the project is complete and executable\n2. Ensure that all code files you output are complete, do not omit any code\n3. Carefully review and check all code before final output, evaluating its executability. If the code cannot be executed or contains errors, regenerate it\n4. If the requirements include external API access or need to use user data (images, videos, audio, etc.), please provide simulated data\n\n======== PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ========\nCreate a web-based dynamic graphic video generation tool where users can add various graphics (such as shapes, lines, icons), set animation paths and effects for them, adjust animation order and rhythm, and export as a video file. Provide real-time preview functionality.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the graphic element creation system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code allows users to add various graphics (shapes, lines, icons) with customizable properties (size, color, position, etc.). Check if the implementation includes a comprehensive library of shapes and if custom SVG/path imports are supported. Score 0 if basic shapes creation is missing, 5 if only basic shapes with limited customization are available, and 10 if a complete graphic creation system with extensive customization options is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the animation path and effect system robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code implements a complete animation system that allows setting paths (linear, curved, custom), timing functions (ease-in, ease-out, bounce, etc.), and transformation effects (scale, rotate, opacity, etc.). Check if keyframe-based animation is supported with editable control points. Deduct 5 points if only basic linear animations are implemented, 3 points if timing functions are limited, and 2 points if transformation options are restricted. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the animation sequencing and timing control comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code provides a timeline interface for adjusting animation order, duration, delays, and overlaps. Examine if the system supports grouping animations, setting dependencies (one animation triggering another), and creating complex sequences. Verify if there's a mechanism to preview specific segments. Deduct 5 points if animations can't be reordered, 3 points if timing adjustments are limited, and 2 points if there's no way to create animation dependencies. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the video export functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code includes a working video export system that can render animations to a standard video format with various quality options. Check if the implementation handles the complex process of converting DOM/Canvas animations to video frames, maintaining consistent frame rates, and showing export progress. Verify support for different resolutions and formats. Score 0 if export is missing, 5 if only basic screenshot/GIF export is available, and 10 if full video export with options is implemented.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as large file imports, memory constraints with complex animations, browser compatibility issues, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should prevent project data loss during crashes, implement undo/redo functionality, and include proper error boundaries. Give 10 points for comprehensive error handling, 5 points for basic error handling, and 0 points if no exception handling exists.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. AI-assisted animation suggestions 2. Audio synchronization capabilities 3. Template library with preset animations). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar animation functions (e.g., multiple tweening engines coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to animation creation (e.g., unnecessary social features) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive background effects in the editor itself). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating rendering/animation logic/UI layers), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Check for performance optimizations like canvas rendering vs. DOM manipulation, worker threads for heavy processing, and efficient data structures for animation state. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Check if the UI provides clear workspace separation between canvas, timeline, and tools panels. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Real-time preview updates without noticeable lag 3) Drag-and-drop interactions for timeline adjustments feel natural with proper snapping. Check if the scrubbing through timeline provides smooth frame updates and if canvas transformations (zoom, pan) are fluid. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual stuttering during preview, and 5 points for unintuitive interaction patterns. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Video Production",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/multimedia_editing-video_production/webgl-short-video-effects-editor.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 681,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. I am a code expert. Please use my professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure the generated code is executable. \n\n======== ROLE ========\nYou are an experienced code expert. I am providing you with a software development requirement description and asking you to generate project code according to this requirement. Strictly follow the rules to help users generate complete project code that is fully commented in simple and easy-to-understand language. Don't output anything else.\n\n======== OUTPUT RULES ========\n1. You should always generate complete, runnable project code. Please ensure the project is complete and executable\n2. Ensure all code files you output are complete, don't omit any code\n3. Before final output, carefully review and check all code to evaluate its executability. If the code cannot run or contains errors, it needs to be regenerated\n4. If the requirements include external API access or user data (images, videos, audio, etc.), please provide mock data\n\n======== PROJECT REQUIREMENTS ========\nPlease develop a short video effects editor that allows users to upload short videos and add various filter effects (such as black and white, vintage, warm tone, etc.) and dynamic stickers through WebGL. Users should be able to add text, emojis, and animation effects to the video through drag and drop, with precise control over their appearance time points and duration. Finally, support exporting the edited video in mp4 format.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the video upload and processing system fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements video file upload functionality through HTML5 File API, includes video format validation (mp4, webm, mov), and proper video loading with metadata extraction. Check if video frame extraction and canvas rendering are properly implemented for editing operations. Score 0 if basic video loading is not implemented, 5 if only basic upload without processing is implemented, and 10 if complete video processing pipeline including frame-by-frame manipulation is included.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are WebGL filter effects comprehensively implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the WebGL implementation includes multiple shader-based filter effects (black and white, vintage, warm tone, etc.) with proper fragment and vertex shader programs. Check if the rendering pipeline efficiently processes video frames in real-time without performance degradation. Deduct 5 points if filters cause significant frame drops (>16.67ms per frame), and 3 points if shader compilation errors occur. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the timeline-based editing system with precise control implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes a comprehensive timeline interface allowing users to control appearance time points and duration of effects/stickers/text with frame-level precision. Evaluate if drag-and-drop functionality is properly implemented with collision detection and snap-to-grid features. Deduct 5 points if timeline synchronization is inaccurate (>100ms deviation), and 3 points if drag-and-drop operations lack visual feedback. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the video export functionality with MP4 encoding properly constructed?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code implements complete video export functionality using MediaRecorder API or WebCodecs API to generate MP4 files. Check if the export process maintains video quality, applies all effects correctly, and provides progress feedback. Deduct 5 points if export fails to preserve applied effects, and 3 points if no progress indication is provided during export. Give 10 points if fully functional with quality preservation.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unsupported video formats, large file uploads, WebGL context loss, memory overflow, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time preview with smooth playback 2. Advanced animation keyframe editor 3. Custom shader effect creator 4. Batch processing capabilities 5. Audio waveform visualization). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple video processing pipelines coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to video editing (e.g., built-in social sharing) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary particle systems during editing). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core video editing functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating video processing/UI/effects layers), WebGL resource management, and memory leak prevention. Deduct 5 points if WebGL context is not properly managed or shaders leak memory; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if video processing blocks the main thread without proper worker implementation. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern video editing interface principles: 1) Professional dark theme with high contrast for video editing 2) Clear timeline visualization with proper scaling 3) Intuitive tool panels with recognizable icons 4) Proper video preview aspect ratio maintenance. Deduct 3 points for each poorly designed UI element, 5 points for unprofessional color schemes that strain eyes during long editing sessions, and 5 points for confusing timeline or control layouts. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the video editing interactions conform to professional standards: 1) Real-time preview maintains 30fps during editing 2) Drag operations provide immediate visual feedback 3) Timeline scrubbing is smooth without stuttering 4) Effect application shows instant preview. Deduct 5 points for each laggy interaction, 3 points for delayed preview updates (>200ms), and 5 points for non-responsive timeline controls. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Video Production",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/multimedia_editing-video_production/webpage-upload-add-watermark-to-videos.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 944,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Be careful to ensure that the code you generate is executable. Create a webpage code that supports uploading videos and adding digital watermarks to videos.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the video upload functionality fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if the code provides a complete video upload solution including file selection, validation, progress indication and error handling. The implementation should handle various video formats (MP4, WebM, MOV, AVI) and validate file size. Score 0 if upload functionality is missing, 5 if only basic upload is implemented without validation, and 10 if it includes comprehensive validation, progress tracking and error handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the digital watermark application functionality properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate if the code successfully applies watermarks to videos. It should support text watermarks (with customizable font, size, color, opacity) and image watermarks (with position control, scaling and opacity adjustment). Check if the watermark preview is available before processing. Deduct 5 points if only one type of watermark is supported, and 3 points if customization options are limited. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the video processing mechanism efficient and properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Assess the video processing implementation. The code should use efficient methods like HTML5 Canvas, WebAssembly or Web Workers to handle video frames without freezing the UI. Check if it supports batch processing and provides processing status feedback. Deduct 5 points if processing is done entirely on the main thread causing UI blocks, 3 points if there's no optimization for large files. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the watermarked video preview and download functionality implemented?",
-      "description": "Check if users can preview the watermarked video before downloading and if download functionality is properly implemented. The preview should be responsive and the download should retain original video quality while including the watermark. The code should support different output formats and quality settings. Deduct 5 points if preview is missing, 3 points if download options are limited. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as unsupported file formats, browser compatibility issues, memory limitations, processing errors, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time watermark positioning using drag-and-drop 2. Animated watermarks support 3. Watermark templates gallery 4. Batch processing with different watermarks). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple video processing libraries loaded) 2. Function modules unrelated to watermarking (e.g., a built-in social sharing system) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., unnecessary animations during processing). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating UI/processing logic/file handling), error handling coverage, and resource management. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if memory leaks could occur during video processing. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles: 1) Harmonious color matching (no more than 3 primary colors) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (body font size ≥ 14px, line height over 1.5 times). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Upload and processing feedback is clear and timely 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual indication of processing stages. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for jarring transitions between processing steps, and 5 points for confusing workflow that doesn't guide users through the watermarking process. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Video Production",
-  "difficulty": "medium"
-}

package/library/multimedia_editing-video_production/xiaohongshu-text-image-to-video-html.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 309,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable and can be demonstrated. Create a Xiaohongshu (Little Red Book) style text image, convert the image to video, add music, make it downloadable, and implement it using HTML.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Xiaohongshu-style text image generation fully implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code accurately implements Xiaohongshu-style visual elements through HTML/CSS/JavaScript, including gradient backgrounds, emoji decorations, stylized fonts, and proper text layout. Check if it supports multi-line text input, automatic line wrapping, and character limits. Score 0 if basic text-to-image conversion is not implemented, 5 if only simple text overlay is achieved, and 10 if all authentic Xiaohongshu visual styles are replicated including shadows, borders, and brand-consistent aesthetics.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Is the image-to-video conversion mechanism properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code uses Canvas API or WebGL to convert static images into video format (MP4/WebM). Evaluate if it includes proper frame rate control (minimum 24fps), duration settings, and transition effects. Verify if the video encoding uses efficient compression algorithms. Deduct 5 points if video quality is poor (resolution below 720p), and 3 points if frame rate is inconsistent. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the audio integration and synchronization system designed correctly?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the music integration uses Web Audio API for seamless audio-video synchronization. Check if it supports multiple audio formats (MP3/WAV/OGG), volume control, and fade-in/fade-out effects. Verify if background music loops properly and matches video duration. Deduct 5 points if audio-video sync drift exceeds 50ms, and 3 points if audio quality is compressed below 128kbps. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the download functionality complete with proper file handling?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code implements client-side file generation using Blob API and provides downloadable links for both image and video files. Evaluate if it includes proper filename generation, file size optimization, and format selection options. Verify cross-browser compatibility for download functionality. Deduct 5 points if download fails on major browsers, and 3 points if file naming is not user-friendly. Give 10 points if fully implemented with progress indicators.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as oversized text input, unsupported file formats, browser compatibility issues, memory limitations, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should effectively handle media processing failures, canvas rendering errors, and file system limitations, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Real-time text style preview 2. Multiple template themes selection 3. Custom font upload 4. Social sharing integration 5. Batch processing capabilities). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar functions (e.g., multiple image rendering engines coexisting) 2. Function modules unrelated to text-image-video creation (e.g., built-in social media feeds) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive particle animations during processing). Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating text processing/image generation/video conversion/audio handling layers), error handling coverage, and performance optimization. Deduct 5 points if memory leaks are found during media processing or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no progress feedback for long-running operations. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles and Xiaohongshu's aesthetic: 1) Harmonious color matching with brand-consistent pink/coral themes 2) Proper layout spacing following 8px grid system 3) Professional typography with readable fonts (≥14px, line height ≥1.5). Check if the text image output matches authentic Xiaohongshu post aesthetics. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for off-brand color schemes, and 5 points for poor text-image composition. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Real-time text preview updates ≤100ms 2) Image generation feedback with progress indicators 3) Video processing with loading states 4) Smooth transitions between editing and preview modes (300-500ms). Deduct 5 points for each operation without visual feedback, 3 points for laggy text input responses, and 5 points if users cannot track processing progress. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Multimedia Editing-Video Production",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/other-astrology_divination_software/bazi-charting-software-four-pillars.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 1501,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the code you provide is executable when possible. Write a Four Pillars (BaZi) charting software that only displays the Four Pillars and Decennial Cycles.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Four Pillars (BaZi) chart calculation correctly implemented?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code accurately calculates the Four Pillars (year, month, day, hour) based on date and time input. Verify that the Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches are correctly assigned according to traditional Chinese calendar calculations. Score 0 if core calculation logic is missing, 5 if basic pillar formation exists with minor errors, and 10 if calculations fully comply with traditional BaZi principles including solar calendar adjustments.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the Decennial Cycles (Luck Pillars) correctly calculated?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code properly determines the Decennial Cycles (Da Yun) based on the Four Pillars chart. Check for accurate implementation of starting age calculation, cycle transitions, and proper sequencing of Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches in the luck pillars. Deduct 5 points if the starting point of luck pillars is incorrect, 3 points if the cycle progression direction (forward/reverse based on gender) is wrong. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Does the software handle various calendar systems and time conversions properly?",
-      "description": "Verify that the software can convert between solar (Gregorian) and lunar calendars accurately, handling leap months and time zone differences correctly. Check if the software properly accounts for historical calendar changes and different date formats. Deduct 5 points if lunar-solar conversion has errors, 3 points if time zone handling is missing, and 2 points if historical dates (before 1900) are not supported. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the visual representation of the Four Pillars chart clear and traditional?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the chart follows traditional BaZi visualization standards with clear distinction between Heavenly Stems and Earthly Branches. Check if Chinese characters are properly displayed with their corresponding elements (Five Elements) appropriately color-coded. Deduct 3 points if elements aren't color-coded, 5 points if the traditional layout isn't followed, and 2 points if the relationship between pillars isn't visually clear. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid dates, future dates, dates before the supported calendar system, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual representation of the Five Elements balance 2. Interactive element clash/combination highlights 3. Simplified explanations of chart significance). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Features beyond the scope of Four Pillars and Decennial Cycles (e.g., detailed fortune interpretation) 2. Unnecessary calculation methods that complicate the codebase 3. Fancy effects that affect performance without adding value to the core functionality. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating calculation logic/view/data models), unit test coverage, and build process automation. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if the build process is not automated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows modern design principles while respecting traditional BaZi aesthetics: 1) Harmonious color matching (using traditional Five Elements colors appropriately) 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system (clear rendering of both Chinese characters and numerals). Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance when switching between chart views or date inputs. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during transitions, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Other-Astrology/Divination Software",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/other-astrology_divination_software/bazi-fortune-telling-software-uni-app.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 809,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Make sure the generated code is executable for demonstration. Develop an Eight-Characters (BaZi) fortune telling software using index.vue in uni-app with BuilderX that can calculate birth eight characters, major life cycles, yearly fortune and other information. Please provide me with the complete code. I am a beginner, so the process should be detailed.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Is the Eight-Characters (BaZi) calculation core accurately implemented?",
-      "description": "Review whether the code implements accurate Chinese lunar calendar conversion, celestial stems and earthly branches calculation, and the Four Pillars formation (year, month, day, hour). Score 0 if core BaZi calculations are missing, 5 if basic calculations are implemented with minor inaccuracies, and 10 if the implementation includes all traditional calculation methods with leap month handling.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Are the major life cycles (Da Yun) calculations properly implemented?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code correctly calculates starting ages for major life cycles, properly implements the 10-year cycles based on gender differences, and accurately displays favorable/unfavorable periods. Deduct 5 points if gender-specific calculations are missing, and 3 points if cycle transitions are incorrectly handled. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Is the yearly fortune (Nian Yun) prediction system comprehensive?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes annual luck predictions with flowing stems and branches (Liu Nian), clash and combination relationships between elements, and specific life aspect predictions. Deduct 5 points if only basic yearly stems/branches are shown without interpretations, and 3 points if seasonal transitions are not considered. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Is the Five Elements analysis and interpretation complete?",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code provides accurate analysis of the user's Five Elements (Wu Xing) composition, identifies day master strength, favorable/unfavorable elements, and offers personalized recommendations. Score 0 if Five Elements analysis is missing, 5 if basic analysis is provided without personalization, and 10 if the implementation includes detailed interpretations with balancing suggestions.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Is the code robust?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as invalid date inputs, future dates, edge case birth times, etc.) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms. Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Are there any innovative features that are eye-catching?",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visual elemental charts 2. Compatibility analysis between two BaZi charts 3. Interactive explanations of terms). Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Are there any redundant features?",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant implementation of similar calculation methods 2. Function modules unrelated to BaZi fortune telling (e.g., irrelevant horoscopes) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance. Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Does the code have engineering quality?",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating calculation logic/view/data layers), appropriate use of uni-app components, and BuilderX integration. Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if BuilderX features are not properly utilized. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Does the interface vision meet professional design standards?",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the overall design follows traditional Chinese aesthetics with modern UI principles: 1) Harmonious color matching reflecting Five Elements theory 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional font system with appropriate classical Chinese typography. Deduct 3 points for each crowded visual element, 5 points for a glaring color combination, and 5 points for chaotic text-image layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Is the dynamic interaction smooth and seamless?",
-      "description": "Judge whether the dynamic effects conform to human perception characteristics: 1) Click feedback delay ≤ 100ms 2) Transition animation duration controlled between 300-500ms 3) Clear visual focus guidance when switching between different fortune telling aspects. Deduct 5 points for each operation without feedback, 3 points for visual after-images during fast sliding, and 5 points for hard-to-find key function buttons. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Game Development-Casual",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}

package/library/other-audio_player/html-music-player-with-interference-and-pause.json

@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "index": 453,
-  "question": "You are a code expert. Please use your professional knowledge to generate accurate and professional responses. Try to ensure that the generated code is executable. I need your help to write an HTML music player page. 1. It should be able to play 10 music tracks plus one interference audio. 2. After playing each music track, it will automatically play the interference audio once and then continue to the next music track, cycling through this pattern. 3. It also needs a pause button. When I press the pause button, the music won't stop immediately, but will pause after the current track finishes playing.",
-  "checklist": [
-    {
-      "id": 0,
-      "title": "Music Player Core Functionality Implementation",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the HTML/JavaScript code correctly implements the music player with 10 tracks and one interference audio. Check if the audio sources are properly defined and if the player initializes correctly.Score 0 if the player doesn't load any tracks, 5 if it loads but doesn't play properly, and 10 if all tracks are properly defined with appropriate metadata (artist, title, duration) and load correctly.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 1,
-      "title": "Automatic Play Sequence Logic",
-      "description": "Assess whether the code properly implements the required play sequence: a music track followed by the interference audio, then the next music track, in a continuous cycle.Deduct 5 points if the sequence logic is flawed (e.g., interference audio doesn't play after each track), deduct 3 points if the transition between tracks isn't smooth. Full score requires proper event listeners for the 'ended' event to trigger the correct sequence.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 2,
-      "title": "Deferred Pause Functionality",
-      "description": "Check if the pause button correctly implements the requirement to pause after the current track finishes playing rather than immediately.Deduct 10 points if pause occurs immediately. Deduct 5 points if the pause functionality works but doesn't resume from the correct position. The full score requires state management to remember the pause request and execute it only after the current track completes.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 3,
-      "title": "Playlist Management System",
-      "description": "Evaluate how well the code manages the playlist of 10 tracks plus the interference audio, including tracking the current position and handling the cycling behavior.Deduct 5 points if the playlist doesn't properly cycle back to the beginning after reaching the end. Deduct 3 points if the current track is not clearly indicated in the UI. Full score requires efficient playlist data structure with proper indexing.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 4,
-      "title": "Code Robustness",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the code can handle common abnormal situations (such as audio loading failures, user rapid clicking, browser compatibility issues) and provide friendly error prompts or recovery mechanisms.Code with strong robustness should be able to effectively handle these edge cases, giving 10 points. If the robustness is average, give 5 points, and if no exceptions are handled, give 0 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 5,
-      "title": "Innovative Features",
-      "description": "Check whether the code includes surprise features that enhance the experience (e.g., 1. Visualizer for audio frequencies 2. Volume normalization between tracks and interference 3. Playlist reordering capabilities).Add 3 points for each practical innovative feature implemented (maximum 10 points).",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 6,
-      "title": "Redundant Features",
-      "description": "Strictly check three types of redundancy: 1. Redundant audio handling logic 2. Function modules unrelated to the music player (e.g., unnecessary animations) 3. Fancy effects that affect performance (e.g., excessive DOM manipulations during playback).Deduct 3 points for each redundancy found, and directly deduct 10 points if the core functions are interfered with by redundant code.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 7,
-      "title": "Engineering Quality",
-      "description": "Review modular design (such as separating audio handling logic from UI components), code organization, and maintainability.Deduct 5 points if global state pollution is found or design patterns are not used; deduct 5 points if the code duplication rate is too high (over 30%); deduct 5 points if there's no clear separation between audio handling and UI components. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 8,
-      "title": "Interface Design Quality",
-      "description": "Evaluate whether the music player interface follows modern design principles: 1) Intuitive controls with clear visual hierarchy 2) Proper layout spacing (element spacing follows the 8px multiple principle) 3) Professional typography system (track titles clearly differentiated from artist names, timestamps in monospace font).Deduct 3 points for each confusing control element, 5 points for poor readability of track information, and 5 points for chaotic player layout. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    },
-    {
-      "id": 9,
-      "title": "Playback Experience Quality",
-      "description": "Judge whether the playback experience meets user expectations: 1) Visual indication of current playing track 2) Smooth transition between tracks and interference audio 3) Responsive controls with appropriate feedback.Deduct 5 points for missing visual indication of currently playing item, 3 points for audible gaps or pops between tracks, and 5 points for controls that don't provide visual feedback when activated. The full score is 10 points.",
-      "maxScore": 10
-    }
-  ],
-  "class": "Other-Audio Player",
-  "difficulty": "hard"
-}