my-markdown-library 0.1.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (113) hide show
  1. checksums.yaml +7 -0
  2. data/F24LS_md/ Lecture 4 - Public.md +347 -0
  3. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 1 - Introduction and Overview.md +327 -0
  4. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 10 - Development_.md +631 -0
  5. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 11 - Econometrics.md +345 -0
  6. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 12 - Finance.md +692 -0
  7. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 13 - Environmental Economics.md +299 -0
  8. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 15 - Conclusion.md +272 -0
  9. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 2 - Demand.md +349 -0
  10. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 3 - Supply.md +329 -0
  11. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 5 - Production C-D.md +291 -0
  12. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 6 - Utility and Latex.md +440 -0
  13. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 7 - Inequality.md +607 -0
  14. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 8 - Macroeconomics.md +704 -0
  15. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 8 - Macro.md +700 -0
  16. data/F24LS_md/Lecture 9 - Game Theory_.md +436 -0
  17. data/F24LS_md/summary.yaml +105 -0
  18. data/F24Lec_MD/LecNB_summary.yaml +206 -0
  19. data/F24Lec_MD/lec01/lec01.md +267 -0
  20. data/F24Lec_MD/lec02/Avocados_demand.md +425 -0
  21. data/F24Lec_MD/lec02/Demand_Steps_24.md +126 -0
  22. data/F24Lec_MD/lec02/PriceElasticity.md +83 -0
  23. data/F24Lec_MD/lec02/ScannerData_Beer.md +171 -0
  24. data/F24Lec_MD/lec02/demand-curve-Fa24.md +213 -0
  25. data/F24Lec_MD/lec03/3.0-CubicCostCurve.md +239 -0
  26. data/F24Lec_MD/lec03/3.1-Supply.md +274 -0
  27. data/F24Lec_MD/lec03/3.2-sympy.md +332 -0
  28. data/F24Lec_MD/lec03/3.3a-california-energy.md +120 -0
  29. data/F24Lec_MD/lec03/3.3b-a-really-hot-tuesday.md +121 -0
  30. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-CSfromSurvey-closed.md +335 -0
  31. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-CSfromSurvey.md +331 -0
  32. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-Supply-Demand-closed.md +519 -0
  33. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-Supply-Demand.md +514 -0
  34. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-four-plot-24.md +34 -0
  35. data/F24Lec_MD/lec04/lec04-four-plot.md +34 -0
  36. data/F24Lec_MD/lec05/Lec5-Cobb-Douglas.md +131 -0
  37. data/F24Lec_MD/lec05/Lec5-CobbD-AER1928.md +283 -0
  38. data/F24Lec_MD/lec06/6.1-Sympy-Differentiation.md +253 -0
  39. data/F24Lec_MD/lec06/6.2-3D-utility.md +287 -0
  40. data/F24Lec_MD/lec06/6.3-QuantEcon-Optimization.md +399 -0
  41. data/F24Lec_MD/lec06/6.4-latex.md +138 -0
  42. data/F24Lec_MD/lec06/6.5-Edgeworth.md +269 -0
  43. data/F24Lec_MD/lec07/7.1-inequality.md +283 -0
  44. data/F24Lec_MD/lec07/7.2-historical-inequality.md +237 -0
  45. data/F24Lec_MD/lec08/macro-fred-api.md +313 -0
  46. data/F24Lec_MD/lec09/lecNB-prisoners-dilemma.md +88 -0
  47. data/F24Lec_MD/lec10/Lec10.2-waterguard.md +401 -0
  48. data/F24Lec_MD/lec10/lec10.1-mapping.md +199 -0
  49. data/F24Lec_MD/lec11/11.1-slr.md +305 -0
  50. data/F24Lec_MD/lec11/11.2-mlr.md +171 -0
  51. data/F24Lec_MD/lec12/Lec12-4-PersonalFinance.md +590 -0
  52. data/F24Lec_MD/lec12/lec12-1_Interest_Payments.md +267 -0
  53. data/F24Lec_MD/lec12/lec12-2-stocks-options.md +235 -0
  54. data/F24Lec_MD/lec13/Co2_ClimateChange.md +139 -0
  55. data/F24Lec_MD/lec13/ConstructingMAC.md +213 -0
  56. data/F24Lec_MD/lec13/EmissionsTracker.md +170 -0
  57. data/F24Lec_MD/lec13/KuznetsHypothesis.md +219 -0
  58. data/F24Lec_MD/lec13/RoslingPlots.md +217 -0
  59. data/F24Lec_MD/lec15/vibecession.md +485 -0
  60. data/F24Textbook_MD/00-intro/index.md +292 -0
  61. data/F24Textbook_MD/01-demand/01-demand.md +152 -0
  62. data/F24Textbook_MD/01-demand/02-example.md +131 -0
  63. data/F24Textbook_MD/01-demand/03-log-log.md +284 -0
  64. data/F24Textbook_MD/01-demand/04-elasticity.md +248 -0
  65. data/F24Textbook_MD/01-demand/index.md +15 -0
  66. data/F24Textbook_MD/02-supply/01-supply.md +203 -0
  67. data/F24Textbook_MD/02-supply/02-eep147-example.md +86 -0
  68. data/F24Textbook_MD/02-supply/03-sympy.md +138 -0
  69. data/F24Textbook_MD/02-supply/04-market-equilibria.md +204 -0
  70. data/F24Textbook_MD/02-supply/index.md +16 -0
  71. data/F24Textbook_MD/03-public/govt-intervention.md +73 -0
  72. data/F24Textbook_MD/03-public/index.md +10 -0
  73. data/F24Textbook_MD/03-public/surplus.md +351 -0
  74. data/F24Textbook_MD/03-public/taxes-subsidies.md +282 -0
  75. data/F24Textbook_MD/04-production/index.md +15 -0
  76. data/F24Textbook_MD/04-production/production.md +178 -0
  77. data/F24Textbook_MD/04-production/shifts.md +296 -0
  78. data/F24Textbook_MD/05-utility/budget-constraints.md +166 -0
  79. data/F24Textbook_MD/05-utility/index.md +15 -0
  80. data/F24Textbook_MD/05-utility/utility.md +136 -0
  81. data/F24Textbook_MD/06-inequality/historical-inequality.md +253 -0
  82. data/F24Textbook_MD/06-inequality/index.md +15 -0
  83. data/F24Textbook_MD/06-inequality/inequality.md +226 -0
  84. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/bertrand.md +257 -0
  85. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/cournot.md +333 -0
  86. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/equilibria-oligopolies.md +96 -0
  87. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/expected-utility.md +61 -0
  88. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/index.md +19 -0
  89. data/F24Textbook_MD/07-game-theory/python-classes.md +340 -0
  90. data/F24Textbook_MD/08-development/index.md +35 -0
  91. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/CentralBanks.md +101 -0
  92. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/Indicators.md +77 -0
  93. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/fiscal_policy.md +36 -0
  94. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/index.md +14 -0
  95. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/is_curve.md +76 -0
  96. data/F24Textbook_MD/09-macro/phillips_curve.md +70 -0
  97. data/F24Textbook_MD/10-finance/index.md +10 -0
  98. data/F24Textbook_MD/10-finance/options.md +178 -0
  99. data/F24Textbook_MD/10-finance/value-interest.md +60 -0
  100. data/F24Textbook_MD/11-econometrics/index.md +16 -0
  101. data/F24Textbook_MD/11-econometrics/multivariable.md +218 -0
  102. data/F24Textbook_MD/11-econometrics/reading-econ-papers.md +25 -0
  103. data/F24Textbook_MD/11-econometrics/single-variable.md +483 -0
  104. data/F24Textbook_MD/11-econometrics/statsmodels.md +58 -0
  105. data/F24Textbook_MD/12-environmental/KuznetsHypothesis-Copy1.md +187 -0
  106. data/F24Textbook_MD/12-environmental/KuznetsHypothesis.md +187 -0
  107. data/F24Textbook_MD/12-environmental/MAC.md +254 -0
  108. data/F24Textbook_MD/12-environmental/index.md +36 -0
  109. data/F24Textbook_MD/LICENSE.md +11 -0
  110. data/F24Textbook_MD/intro.md +26 -0
  111. data/F24Textbook_MD/references.md +25 -0
  112. data/F24Textbook_MD/summary.yaml +414 -0
  113. metadata +155 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,607 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ title: "Lecture 7 - Inequality"
3
+ type: slides
4
+ week: 7
5
+ source_path: "/Users/ericvandusen/Documents/Data88E-ForTraining/F24LS/Lecture 7 - Inequality.pptx"
6
+ ---
7
+
8
+ ## Slide 1: Data 88E: Economic Models
9
+
10
+ - Lecture 7: Inequality
11
+
12
+ ## Slide 2: Announcements
13
+
14
+ - Assignments
15
+ - Project 2 underway Use Ed megathreads and office hours if you have questions.
16
+ - Lab 6 will be released, it’ll be due before next class
17
+
18
+ ## Slide 3: What about A - Total Factor Productivity
19
+
20
+ - Lab 4 and Proj 2 talk about A
21
+ - A theoretical Model of a production - a term for productivity
22
+ - And outcome of an estimation ( Intercept term)
23
+ - Growth economics is a whole field of Macroeconomics
24
+ - A should grow over time ( accumulation of productivity)
25
+
26
+ ## Slide 4: Lab 5 three models of Utility
27
+
28
+ - Mathematical formulations to represent assumptions about Utility
29
+ - Complements - Utility comes from combination
30
+ - Substitutes - Utility comes from either good equally
31
+ - Eg Cobb Douglas - somewhere in between
32
+
33
+ ## Slide 5: Lab 5 postscript
34
+
35
+ ## Slide 6: Agenda
36
+
37
+ - Why Inequality
38
+ - Measuring Inequality
39
+ - Lorenz Curve
40
+ - Gini Coefficient
41
+ - Income Inequality Historically
42
+ - Income Inequality Internationally
43
+ - Textbook Chapter has code for most visualizations in class today
44
+ - Data Visualizations - From Econ Profs Saez and Zucman
45
+ - Let’s explore these together
46
+ - We have a few website data demos - find them either through the website or through opening this slide deck and following the links
47
+
48
+ ## Slide 7: Why income inequality matters
49
+
50
+ - Further reading
51
+
52
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
53
+
54
+ P
55
+
56
+ </details>
57
+
58
+ ## Slide 8: Alesina and Perotti - 1996
59
+
60
+ ## Slide 9: How does income inequality look like?
61
+
62
+ - Dollar Street Demo
63
+ - https://www.gapminder.org/dollar-street
64
+ - 458 families in 66 countries, with 43971 photos
65
+ - Go to Dollar Street and find one the following:
66
+ - How do people cook?
67
+ - Live?
68
+ - Brush their teeth?
69
+ - Wash hands?
70
+ - Worship?
71
+ - Dream of having?
72
+ - Talk in pairs:
73
+ - How is a photo different than a data point
74
+
75
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
76
+
77
+ P
78
+
79
+ </details>
80
+
81
+ ## Slide 10: (untitled)
82
+
83
+ ## Slide 11: Income vs Wealth
84
+
85
+ - Income - Amount of money you make during a specified time frame
86
+ - This is what we’ll focus on today
87
+ - All of our analysis today will be pre-tax!
88
+ - Wealth - total value of assets - liabilities
89
+ - Assets: real estate, securities, cash
90
+ - Luxuries: Antiques
91
+ - Intangible: patents, copyrights, etc
92
+ - Liabilities: mortgages, loans, etc
93
+
94
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
95
+
96
+ E
97
+
98
+ </details>
99
+
100
+ ## Slide 12: Measuring Income Inequality
101
+
102
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
103
+
104
+ E
105
+
106
+ </details>
107
+
108
+ ## Slide 13: Lorenz Curve
109
+
110
+ - Rank every person in order by how much income
111
+ - ( rank each bin of the population - eg decile = 10%)
112
+ - X axis - income percentile
113
+ - Y axis - at the Xth percentile, share of combined income for everyone below the Xth percentile
114
+ - For any point (x,y) on the Lorenz curve, we can say that “the bottom x percent own y% of the income”.
115
+
116
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
117
+
118
+ E
119
+
120
+ </details>
121
+
122
+ ## Slide 14: An example
123
+
124
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
125
+
126
+ E
127
+
128
+ </details>
129
+
130
+ ## Slide 15: An example
131
+
132
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
133
+
134
+ E
135
+
136
+ </details>
137
+
138
+ ## Slide 16: An example
139
+
140
+ - Just percentiles
141
+ - From the data
142
+
143
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
144
+
145
+ E
146
+
147
+ </details>
148
+
149
+ ## Slide 17: An example
150
+
151
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
152
+
153
+ E
154
+
155
+ </details>
156
+
157
+ ## Slide 18: Conditions of the Lorenz Curve
158
+
159
+ - (0,0) and (1,1) on the curve
160
+ - (0,0): 0% of the households own 0% of the total income
161
+ - (1,1): 100% of the households own 100% of the total income
162
+ - Slope is always increasing (convex function, second derivative > 0)
163
+ - X-axis is based on income percentile, which sorts households in ascending order of income
164
+ - E.g. the household at the 1st percentile will earn less than the household at the 2nd percentile. Hence, the change in total income % at the 2nd percentile must be greater than the change in total income at the 1st percentile
165
+ - We can apply this logic to every percentile!
166
+
167
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
168
+
169
+ E
170
+
171
+ </details>
172
+
173
+ ## Slide 19: Line of Perfect Equality
174
+
175
+ - What would the Lorenz curve look like if our economy was perfectly equal?
176
+ - Hint: everyone has the same income!
177
+
178
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
179
+
180
+ E
181
+
182
+ </details>
183
+
184
+ ## Slide 20: Line of Perfect Equality
185
+
186
+ - Since everyone has the same income:
187
+ - 1st percentile & under owns 1% of income
188
+ - 2nd percentile & under owns 2% of income
189
+ - …
190
+ - 100th percentile & under owns 100% of income
191
+
192
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
193
+
194
+ E
195
+
196
+ </details>
197
+
198
+ ## Slide 21: Which country has more inequality?
199
+
200
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
201
+
202
+ E
203
+
204
+ </details>
205
+
206
+ ## Slide 22: Which country has more inequality?
207
+
208
+ - Bottom 10% own:
209
+ - 2% in Country1
210
+ - 3% in Country2
211
+ - Bottom 50% own:
212
+ - 23% in Country1
213
+ - 27% in Country2
214
+ - Top 10% own:
215
+ - 100-75=25% in Country1
216
+ - 100-81=19% in Country2
217
+
218
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
219
+
220
+ E
221
+
222
+ </details>
223
+
224
+ ## Slide 23: Which country has more inequality?
225
+
226
+ ## Slide 24: Which country has more inequality? (II)
227
+
228
+ ## Slide 25: Which country has more inequality? (II)
229
+
230
+ - Bottom 10% own:
231
+ - 2% in Country1
232
+ - 3% in Country3
233
+ - Bottom 50% own:
234
+ - 23% in Country1
235
+ - 25% in Country3
236
+ - Top 10% own:
237
+ - 100-75=25% in Country1
238
+ - 100-73=27% in Country3
239
+
240
+ ## Slide 26: Which country has more inequality? (II)
241
+
242
+ ## Slide 27: Motivation for the Gini Coefficient
243
+
244
+ - The previous example highlights an ambiguity with directly using the Lorenz Curve as a measure of income inequality.
245
+ - To address this, we turn to the Gini Coefficient
246
+
247
+ ## Slide 28: Gini Coefficient
248
+
249
+ ## Slide 29: Gini Coefficient - Using Calculus
250
+
251
+ ## Slide 30: Gini Coefficient - Using Calculus
252
+
253
+ - In the homework, you will empirically apply a Lorenz curve function to different countries, and use that to compute the Gini coefficient!
254
+
255
+ ## Slide 31: Gini Coefficient - Intuition
256
+
257
+ - What is the Gini coefficient if the economy is perfectly equal?
258
+ - What is the Gini coefficient if the economy is completely unequal?
259
+
260
+ ## Slide 32: Gini Coefficient - Intuition
261
+
262
+ - What is the Gini coefficient if the economy is perfectly equal?
263
+ - Since Lorenz curve = Line of equality, A = 0. Hence, Gini = 0.
264
+ - What is the Gini coefficient if the economy is completely unequal?
265
+ - We can imagine that complete inequality entails 1 person owning all the income. Hence, The area of B is minimized to be essentially 0. Hence, Gini = 1.
266
+
267
+ ## Slide 33: An Aside - Lab 6
268
+
269
+ - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/02664768700000032
270
+
271
+ ## Slide 34: Lab 6 - and Sympy can do Integration as well!
272
+
273
+ ## Slide 35: Gini Coefficients Around the World
274
+
275
+ - Sweden: 0.27
276
+ - India: 0.35
277
+ - Singapore: 0.46
278
+ - Canada: 0.34
279
+ - Kenya: 0.48
280
+ - United States: 0.42
281
+ - Most Equal: Liberia, Afghanistan, Iraq
282
+ - Most unequal: South Africa, Haiti, Botswana, Namibia
283
+ - OECD Data
284
+
285
+ ## Slide 36: OECD table -
286
+
287
+ - https://data.oecd.org/inequality/income-inequality.htm
288
+
289
+ ## Slide 37: Summary of the Gini index
290
+
291
+ - The Gini coefficient is a good measure for the magnitude of income inequality, allowing us to easily compare income inequality across countries.
292
+ - Typically, Gini coefficients range between 0.25 and 0.5
293
+ - Computing the Gini coefficient is quite complicated: comprehensive income data may not always be collected
294
+ - What about wealth inequality?
295
+
296
+ ## Slide 38: Lecture Notebook 1
297
+
298
+ ## Slide 39: Income Inequality Historically
299
+
300
+ ## Slide 40: Factors that Impact Income Inequality
301
+
302
+ - Key factors and alternative causes
303
+ - Top Marginal Tax Rates
304
+ - Unemployment Rates
305
+ - Population Growth
306
+ - Trends
307
+ - Policy implications
308
+ - Notebook for the following slides is the Notebook for the textbook chapter!
309
+
310
+ ## Slide 41: Historically - Lorenz Gini can be hard to come by
311
+
312
+ - Simplify
313
+ - Percent of Income to bottom 50%
314
+ - Percent of Income to top 10%
315
+ - Percent of Income to top 1%
316
+
317
+ ## Slide 42: US Income Inequality (Raw Data)
318
+
319
+ - Percentile
320
+ - Range of income bracket
321
+ - Income share
322
+ - Some have values, some are nan
323
+ - Why are some nan?
324
+
325
+ ## Slide 43: US Income Inequality (Raw Data)
326
+
327
+ - Percentile
328
+ - Range of income bracket
329
+ - Income share
330
+ - Some have values, some are nan
331
+ - Why are some nan?
332
+ - Data wasn’t being collected
333
+
334
+ ## Slide 44: US Income Inequality (Cleaned Data)
335
+
336
+ ## Slide 45: US Income Inequality Graphed
337
+
338
+ ## Slide 46: (untitled)
339
+
340
+ ## Slide 47: (untitled)
341
+
342
+ ## Slide 48: (untitled)
343
+
344
+ ## Slide 49: Top Marginal Tax Rates
345
+
346
+ - Tax on portion of income above a certain income level
347
+ - Follows progressive taxation
348
+ - The more income you earn, the higher the % tax rate will be
349
+ - Possible solution to reduce income inequality?
350
+ - Formula using 2019 Joint Income Taxes
351
+ - Base + Tax Percentage \* (Total Income - Maximum of Lower Bracket)
352
+ - Maximum of Bracket
353
+ - Base
354
+ - Tax Percentage
355
+
356
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
357
+
358
+ In general, you will pay a lower tax rate for your first X dollars, and a higher rate for dollars earned over X.
359
+
360
+ </details>
361
+
362
+ ## Slide 50: Top Marginal Tax Rates and Income Inequality
363
+
364
+ - Is there a relationship?
365
+
366
+ ## Slide 51: US Income Inequality Trends
367
+
368
+ - Top 1% Share
369
+ - Decreases from 1910 - 1970s
370
+ - Increases from 1970s - present
371
+ - Top 10% Share
372
+ - Increases from 1910 - 1930
373
+ - Decreases from 1930s - 1970s
374
+ - Increases from 1970s - present
375
+ - Bottom 50% Share
376
+ - Starts at 1960s
377
+ - Increases a bit
378
+ - Decreases from 1970s - present
379
+
380
+ ## Slide 52: US Policies 1910s - 1970s
381
+
382
+ - Income Inequality Decreasing
383
+ - 1910s policies
384
+ - Top 1% started contributing to taxes to make up for reduced revenue from high tariffs
385
+ - Top marginal rate started to increase from 7% to 73%
386
+ - Great Depression
387
+ - Top marginal tax rates increased to 94% by 1944
388
+ - Great Compression (40s to 70s)
389
+ - Before the Great Depression, the top 1% had ~20% of total income
390
+ - During the Great Depression, the top 1% had ~15% of total income
391
+ - For 10 years after, the top 1% had below 10% of total income
392
+ - For 30 years after, the top 1% had ~8% of total income
393
+
394
+ ## Slide 53: US Policies 1970s - Present
395
+
396
+ - Income inequality Increasing
397
+ - 1970s - High unemployment and inflation, low growth
398
+ - Government took action
399
+ - Reduced marginal tax rates (from 70% to 38.5%)
400
+ - Deregulated corporate institutions
401
+ - Unfriendly to labor union memberships (membership decreased by half within 30 years)
402
+ - The share for the bottom 50% decreases and share for the top 1% increases
403
+ - Financialization
404
+
405
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
406
+
407
+ Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 by Reagan
408
+
409
+ </details>
410
+
411
+ ## Slide 54: Summary of Income Inequality
412
+
413
+ - Between 1910s and 1970s, income inequality decreased. Between 1970s and the present, income inequality is increasing
414
+ - There is an inverse correlation between top marginal tax rates and income inequality
415
+ - Other key factors of income inequality are unemployment rate and population growth
416
+ - Income inequality is increasing around the world
417
+
418
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
419
+
420
+ E
421
+
422
+ </details>
423
+
424
+ ## Slide 55: Compare US states?
425
+
426
+ - https://wid.world/country/california/ https://wid.world/country/new-york/
427
+
428
+ ## Slide 56: Realtime Inequality Demo
429
+
430
+ - Realtime Inequality
431
+ - Methodology
432
+
433
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
434
+
435
+ P
436
+
437
+ </details>
438
+
439
+ ## Slide 57: Github!
440
+
441
+ ## Slide 58: Realtime Inequality
442
+
443
+ - Income Growth in the US (1976-present)
444
+ - Wealth Growth in the US (1976-present)
445
+ - Disposable Income Growth (COVID-19)
446
+ - Real Factor Income Growth (COVID-19)
447
+ - How can data be used to motivate
448
+ - Public Policy?
449
+
450
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
451
+
452
+ P
453
+
454
+ </details>
455
+
456
+ ## Slide 59: Tax Justice Now Demo
457
+
458
+ - Tax Justice Now
459
+
460
+ ## Slide 60: Tax Justice Demo
461
+
462
+ - Do one of the following:
463
+ - Make your own tax plan
464
+ - or
465
+ - Compare proposed tax plans
466
+ - What do you think has the greatest impact creating a truly progressive tax system? What is the effect of a wealth tax? What’s the impact on tax evasion? Any other thoughts?
467
+
468
+ ## Slide 61: Income Inequality Internationally
469
+
470
+ Lecture Notebook 7.2
471
+
472
+ ## Slide 62: Unemployment Rates and Inequality
473
+
474
+ - Positive correlation between income inequality and unemployment rates
475
+ - Certain groups are vulnerable to unemployment in countries with high income inequality
476
+ - young workers
477
+ - low-skilled workers
478
+ - workers who had been out of work for a long time
479
+ - Why?
480
+ - Employers prefer skilled workers with relevant experience
481
+ - “Unemployment accounts for a large part of the increase in earnings inequality that this country experienced between 1991 and 1998”
482
+ - Martín González (Universidad Torcuato Di Tella) and Alicia Menendez (Princeton University)
483
+ - Simulate wages across employed and unemployed over time
484
+
485
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
486
+
487
+ E
488
+
489
+ </details>
490
+
491
+ ## Slide 63: Unemployment Rates
492
+
493
+ - Countries with notable unemployment rates
494
+ - Brazil (53.9)
495
+ - Europe
496
+ - US
497
+ - Russia
498
+
499
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
500
+
501
+ E
502
+
503
+ </details>
504
+
505
+ ## Slide 64: Population Growth and Inequality Discussion
506
+
507
+ - How does population growth affect economic inequality?
508
+ - Growth Phase ( 20th Century)
509
+ - Strong correlation between a country’s population growth (measured by birth rates) and its income inequality
510
+ - University of Toronto’s Marijn Bolhuis and University of Oxford’s Alexandra de Pleijt
511
+ - Wealth Phase ( 21st Century)
512
+ - Finds that low birth rates, rather than high birth rates, are causing today’s income inequality.
513
+ - With lower birth rates, fewer children per couple are being borne, so these children get more of their parents’ inheritance.
514
+ - Thomas Piketty (Economics Professor at London School of Economics)
515
+
516
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
517
+
518
+ E
519
+
520
+ </details>
521
+
522
+ ## Slide 65: Population Growth
523
+
524
+ - Most countries had a high population growth between 1-2% during the 1980s
525
+ - Effects can be seen in the 90s
526
+
527
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
528
+
529
+ E
530
+
531
+ </details>
532
+
533
+ ## Slide 66: World Inequality Database Demo
534
+
535
+ - Data from the World Inequality Database (co-directed by Berkeley Economics Professors Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman)
536
+ - Data collection methodology
537
+ - Fiscal
538
+ - Survey
539
+ - National accounts
540
+ - Compared to
541
+ - Self-reported survey data
542
+ - Why is relying on just self-reported survey data unreliable?
543
+
544
+ <details><summary>Speaker notes</summary>
545
+
546
+ P
547
+
548
+ </details>
549
+
550
+ ## Slide 67: World Inequality Database Demo
551
+
552
+ - Data from the World Inequality Database (co-directed by Berkeley Economics Professors Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman)
553
+ - Data collection methodology
554
+ - Fiscal
555
+ - Survey
556
+ - National accounts
557
+ - Compared to
558
+ - Self-reported survey data
559
+ - Why is relying on just self-reported survey data unreliable?
560
+ - Non-response bias from the top income bracket
561
+ - Limited time span
562
+
563
+ ## Slide 68: Your turn! Go to one of the following:
564
+
565
+ - WID - World Inequality Database (Income Share of top 10%)
566
+ - WID - World Inequality Database (Wealth Share of top 10%)
567
+ - WID - World Inequality Database (Carbon Emissions Share of top 10%)
568
+ - WID - World Inequality Database (Female Labor Income Share)
569
+
570
+ ## Slide 69: International Income Inequality Data
571
+
572
+ - Top 10% income bracket
573
+
574
+ ## Slide 70: International Income Inequality Graphed
575
+
576
+ ## Slide 71: International Income Inequality Trends
577
+
578
+ - Global inequality is rising worldwide
579
+ - What explains Russia’s trend?
580
+
581
+ ## Slide 72: International Income Inequality Trends
582
+
583
+ - Global inequality is rising worldwide
584
+ - What explains Russia’s trend?
585
+ - Income inequality increased around 1991
586
+ - Fall of USSR
587
+ - Former USSR officials acquired state property
588
+ - Increase in Russian oligarchs with mass privatization
589
+
590
+ ## Slide 73: US versus Europe Income Inequality
591
+
592
+ ## Slide 74: Income Gini for China
593
+
594
+ - https://www.statista.com/statistics/250400/inequality-of-income-distribution-in-china-based-on-the-gini-index
595
+
596
+ ## Slide 75: Income Gini for Mexico by State
597
+
598
+ - https://www.statista.com/statistics/1040573/income-distribution-gini-coefficient-mexico-state/
599
+
600
+ ## Slide 76: Wealth Inequality in OECD
601
+
602
+ - https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/7e1bf673-en.pdf
603
+
604
+ ## Slide 77: Median Income vs GDP per Household
605
+
606
+ ## Slide 78: Compensation / GDP
607
+