wegho-agentes 7.0.4 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13497.patch

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13497
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/sklearn/feature_selection/_mutual_info.py
-+++ b/sklearn/feature_selection/_mutual_info.py
-@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
- # Author: Nikolay Mayorov <n59_ru@hotmail.com>
- # License: 3-clause BSD
- 
-+import numpy as np
- from sklearn.metrics.cluster import mutual_info_score
- from sklearn.neighbors import NearestNeighbors
- from sklearn.preprocessing import scale
-@@ -47,7 +48,7 @@ def _estimate_mi(X, y, discrete_features='auto', discrete_target=False,
-     n_samples, n_features = X.shape
- 
-     # Determine discrete features
--    if discrete_features == 'auto':
-+    if isinstance(discrete_features, str) and discrete_features == 'auto':
-         discrete_mask = np.zeros(n_features, dtype=bool)
-         for i in range(n_features):
-             if np.issubdtype(X[:, i].dtype, np.integer):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13584.patch

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13584
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the scikit-learn repository. The bug is in `sklearn/utils/_pprint.py` in the `_changed_params` function. Let me generate the patch based on my knowledge of the scikit-learn codebase:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/utils/_pprint.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/_pprint.py
-@@ -91,6 +91,17 @@ def _get_parameter_names_to_show(estimator, print_changed_only):
-     return sorted(params.keys())
- 
- 
-+def _safe_eq(a, b):
-+    """Safely check equality between two values, handling numpy arrays."""
-+    try:
-+        result = a == b
-+        # Handle numpy arrays and other objects that return non-boolean results
-+        if hasattr(result, '__iter__') and not isinstance(result, str):
-+            return False
-+        return bool(result)
-+    except (ValueError, TypeError):
-+        return False
-+
-+
- def _changed_params(estimator):
-     """Return dict (name: value) of parameters that were given to estimator
-     with non-default values."""
-@@ -100,7 +111,7 @@ def _changed_params(estimator):
-     init_params = signature(estimator.__init__).parameters
-     init_params = {name: param.default for name, param in init_params.items()}
-     for k, v in params.items():
--        if (v != init_params[k] and
-+        if (not _safe_eq(v, init_params[k]) and
-                 not (is_scalar_nan(init_params[k]) and is_scalar_nan(v))):
-             filtered_params[k] = v
-     return filtered_params
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13779.patch

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13779
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on my knowledge of the scikit-learn codebase and the issue described, I'll generate the patch. The bug occurs because in the `fit` method, the code checks for `sample_weight` support on all estimators before filtering out `None` ones. The fix is to filter out `None` estimators before doing the `sample_weight` support check.
-
---- a/sklearn/ensemble/voting.py
-+++ b/sklearn/ensemble/voting.py
-@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ class _BaseVoting(TransformerMixin, _BaseHeterogeneousEnsemble):
- 
-         if sample_weight is not None:
-             for name, step in self.estimators:
--                if not has_fit_parameter(step, 'sample_weight'):
-+                if step is not None and not has_fit_parameter(step, 'sample_weight'):
-                     raise ValueError('Underlying estimator \'%s\' does not'
-                                      ' support sample weights.' % name)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14087.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14087
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and the architect's analysis, I can generate the patch. The error occurs at line 2193-2194 where `coefs_paths[:, i, best_indices[i], :]` is used but the array has a different shape when `refit=False`. Looking at the traceback and the bug description, the issue is in the coefficient averaging logic.
-
---- a/sklearn/linear_model/logistic.py
-+++ b/sklearn/linear_model/logistic.py
-@@ -2190,7 +2190,7 @@ class LogisticRegressionCV(LogisticRegression, BaseEstimator,
-                     w = np.mean([coefs_paths[i, best_indices[i], :]
-                                  for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
-                 else:
--                    w = np.mean([coefs_paths[:, i, best_indices[i], :]
-+                    w = np.mean([coefs_paths[i, best_indices[i], :]
-                                  for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
- 
-                 best_indices_C = best_indices % len(self.Cs_)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14092.patch

@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14092
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for scikit-learn's NCA module. Let me create the patch based on the standard scikit-learn codebase structure and the issue details:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/neighbors/nca.py
-+++ b/sklearn/neighbors/nca.py
-@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
- from __future__ import print_function
- 
- import numpy as np
-+import numbers
- import sys
- import time
- import warnings
-@@ -299,7 +300,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
-         # Check the preferred dimensionality of the projected space
-         if self.n_components is not None:
--            if not isinstance(self.n_components, int):
-+            if not isinstance(self.n_components, numbers.Integral) or isinstance(self.n_components, bool):
-                 raise TypeError("n_components must be an integer; got "
-                                 "(type {})".format(type(self.n_components)))
- 
-@@ -310,7 +311,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
-                                 .format(X.shape[1]))
- 
-         # Check the maximum number of iterations
--        if not isinstance(self.max_iter, int):
-+        if not isinstance(self.max_iter, numbers.Integral) or isinstance(self.max_iter, bool):
-             raise TypeError("max_iter must be an integer; got "
-                             "(type {})".format(type(self.max_iter)))
- 
-@@ -320,7 +321,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
-                                 .format(self.max_iter))
- 
-         # Check the tolerance
--        if not isinstance(self.tol, float):
-+        if not isinstance(self.tol, numbers.Real) or isinstance(self.tol, bool):
-             raise TypeError("tol must be a float; got (type {})".format(
-                 type(self.tol)))
- 
-@@ -330,7 +331,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
-                                 .format(self.tol))
- 
-         # Check the number of iterations between callbacks
--        if not isinstance(self.callback_interval, int):
-+        if not isinstance(self.callback_interval, numbers.Integral) or isinstance(self.callback_interval, bool):
-             raise TypeError("callback_interval must be an integer; got "
-                             "(type {})".format(type(self.callback_interval)))
- 
-@@ -340,7 +341,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(BaseEstimator, TransformerMixin):
-                                 .format(self.callback_interval))
- 
-         # Check the verbosity level
--        if not isinstance(self.verbose, int):
-+        if not isinstance(self.verbose, numbers.Integral) or isinstance(self.verbose, bool):
-             raise TypeError("verbose must be an integer; got (type {})".format(
-                 type(self.verbose)))
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14894.patch

@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14894
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and the architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the scikit-learn repository. The issue is in `sklearn/svm/base.py` around line 302 where there's a division by `n_class` which can be 0 when there are no support vectors.
-
-Let me create the patch based on the standard scikit-learn codebase structure:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/svm/base.py
-+++ b/sklearn/svm/base.py
-@@ -295,6 +295,15 @@ class BaseLibSVM(BaseEstimator, metaclass=ABCMeta):
- 
-         self.support_vectors_ = sp.csr_matrix(support_vectors_)
- 
-+        # Handle case with no support vectors (n_class == 0)
-+        if len(googletag.support_vectors_.data) == 0:
-+            self.dual_coef_ = sp.csr_matrix([])
-+            return
-+
-         n_class = len(googletag.n_support_) - 1
-         n_SV = self.support_vectors_.shape[0]
- 
-@@ -299,6 +308,11 @@ class BaseLibSVM(BaseEstimator, metaclass=ABCMeta):
-         dual_coef_indptr = np.arange(0, dual_coef_indices.size + 1,
-                                      dual_coef_indices.size / n_class)
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. The issue mentions line 302 specifically with the division. Let me create a proper patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/svm/base.py
-+++ b/sklearn/svm/base.py
-@@ -294,6 +294,12 @@ class BaseLibSVM(BaseEstimator, metaclass=ABCMeta):
-         self._sparse = True
-         self.support_vectors_ = sp.csr_matrix(support_vectors_)
- 
-+        # Handle the case with no support vectors
-+        n_class = len(self.n_support_) - 1
-+        if n_class == 0:
-+            self.dual_coef_ = sp.csr_matrix([])
-+            return
-+
-         dual_coef_indices = np.tile(np.arange(n_SV), n_class)
-         dual_coef_indptr = np.arange(0, dual_coef_indices.size + 1,
-                                      dual_coef_indices.size / n_class)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14983.patch

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14983
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue description and architect's analysis, I can generate the patch. The issue is that `_RepeatedSplits` base class lacks a `__repr__` method. Looking at scikit-learn's codebase patterns, the fix requires adding a `__repr__` method to `_RepeatedSplits` that properly displays the parameters.
-
---- a/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-+++ b/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-@@ -1027,6 +1027,15 @@ class _RepeatedSplits(metaclass=ABCMeta):
-         self.n_repeats = n_repeats
-         self.random_state = random_state
-         self.cvargs = cvargs
-+
-+    def __repr__(self):
-+        return _build_repr(self)
-+
-+    def get_n_splits(self, X=None, y=None, groups=None):
-+        """Returns the number of splitting iterations in the cross-validator
-+
-+        Parameters
-+        ----------
-
-Wait, I need to provide just the minimal fix. Let me create a cleaner patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-+++ b/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-@@ -1027,6 +1027,9 @@ class _RepeatedSplits(metaclass=ABCMeta):
-         self.n_repeats = n_repeats
-         self.random_state = random_state
-         self.cvargs = cvargs
-+
-+    def __repr__(self):
-+        return _build_repr(self)
- 
-     def split(self, X, y=None, groups=None):
-         """Generates indices to split data into training and test set.

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15512.patch

@@ -1,143 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15512
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue and architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the scikit-learn AffinityPropagation implementation. The issue is in version 0.20.3 where the file would be `sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py`. Let me create the patch based on the standard scikit-learn codebase structure and the described bug:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-+++ b/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ import numpy as np
- from ..exceptions import ConvergenceWarning
- from ..base import BaseEstimator, ClusterMixin
- from ..utils import as_float_array, check_array
-+from ..utils.validation import check_is_fitted
- 
- 
- def _equal_similarities_and_preferences(S, preference):
-@@ -93,6 +94,11 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
- 
-     cluster_centers_indices : array, shape (n_clusters,)
-         index of clusters centers
-+
-+    n_iter : int
-+        Number of iterations run.
-+
-+    converged : bool
- 
-     Notes
-     -----
-@@ -195,12 +201,19 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             if verbose:
-                 print("Converged after %d iterations." % it)
-             break
-+    else:
-+        if verbose:
-+            print("Did not converge")
-+        converged = False
-+    else:
-+        converged = True
- 
-     I = np.flatnonzero(E)
-     K = I.size  # Identify exemplars
- 
-     if K > 0:
--        c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
-+        if not converged:
-+            warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
-+                          "will not have any cluster centers.", ConvergenceWarning)
-+            return np.array([]), np.array([-1] * n_samples), it + 1, False
-+        c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
-         c[I] = np.arange(K)  # Identify clusters
-         # Refine the final set of exemplars and clusters andடித
-         # return results
-@@ -213,17 +226,19 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             labels[I[k]] = k
- 
-         cluster_centers_indices = I
-+        return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1, True
-     else:
--        warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
--                      "will not have any cluster centers.", ConvergenceWarning)
--        cluster_centers_indices = np.array([])
--        labels = np.array([-1] * n_samples)
-+        if not converged:
-+            warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
-+                          "will not have any cluster centers.", ConvergenceWarning)
-+        return np.array([]), np.array([-1] * n_samples), it + 1, converged
- 
--    if return_n_iter:
--        return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1
-+    return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1, converged
- 
--    return cluster_centers_indices, labels
- 
-+    if return_n_iter:
-+        return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1, converged
-+    return cluster_centers_indices, labels, converged
- 
- ###############################################################################
-```
-
-Let me provide a cleaner, more accurate patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-+++ b/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-@@ -195,6 +195,9 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             if verbose:
-                 print("Converged after %d iterations." % it)
-             break
-+    else:
-+        if verbose:
-+            print("Did not converge")
- 
-     I = np.flatnonzero(E)
-     K = I.size  # Identify exemplars
-@@ -213,9 +216,11 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             labels[I[k]] = k
- 
-         cluster_centers_indices = I
-+        converged = (it < max_iter - 1 or np.sum(se == convergence_iter) == n_samples)
-     else:
-         warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
-                       "will not have any cluster centers.", ConvergenceWarning)
-+        converged = False
-         cluster_centers_indices = np.array([])
-         labels = np.array([-1] * n_samples)
- 
-@@ -304,6 +309,11 @@ class AffinityPropagation(BaseEstimator, ClusterMixin):
-     n_iter_ : int
-         Number of iterations taken to converge.
- 
-+    converged_ : bool
-+        Whether the algorithm converged. If False, cluster_centers_indices_
-+        will be empty and labels_ will be -1 for all samples as documented
-+        for non-convergence.
-+
-     Examples
-     --------
-     >>> from sklearn.cluster import AffinityPropagation
-@@ -352,8 +362,19 @@ class AffinityPropagation(BaseEstimator, ClusterMixin):
-                 "affinity matrix, got %s" % self.affinity)
-         self.cluster_centers_indices_, self.labels_, self.n_iter_ = \
-             affinity_propagation(
--                self.affinity_matrix_, self.preference, max_iter=self.max_iter,
-+                self.affinity_matrix_, self.preference,
-                 convergence_iter=self.convergence_iter, damping=self.damping,
--                copy=self.copy, verbose=self.verbose, return_n_iter=True)
-+                max_iter=self.max_iter, copy=self.copy, verbose=self.verbose,
-+                return_n_iter=True)
-+
-+        if self.n_iter_ == self.max_iter and not (
-+                self.cluster_centers_indices_.size == 0 and
-+                np.all(self.labels_ == -1)):
-+            warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
-+                          "will not have any cluster centers.",
-+                          ConvergenceWarning)
-+            self.cluster_centers_indices_ = np.array([])
-+            self.labels_ = np.array([-1] * X.shape[0])
-+            self.converged_ = False
-+        else:
-+            self.converged_ = self.n_iter_ < self.max_iter
- 
-         if self.affinity != "precomputed":

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15535.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15535
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-+++ b/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ def check_clusterings(labels_true, labels_pred):
-     labels_pred : array, shape = [n_samples]
-         The predicted labels.
-     """
--    labels_true = check_array(labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
--    labels_pred = check_array(labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
-+    labels_true = check_array(labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
-+    labels_pred = check_array(labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
- 
-     # input checks
-     if labels_true.ndim != 1:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25500.patch

@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25500
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/sklearn/isotonic.py
-+++ b/sklearn/isotonic.py
-@@ -360,20 +360,35 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-         self.X_thresholds_ = X[keep_inds]
-         self.y_thresholds_ = y[keep_inds]
-         self.increasing_ = increasing
-         return self
- 
--    def transform(self, T):
--        """Transform new data by linear interpolation.
-+    def _transform(self, T):
-+        """Core transformation logic.
-+
-+        This private method contains the core transformation logic without
-+        the pandas output wrapper. It is used by both `transform()` and
-+        `predict()` to ensure `predict()` always returns a numpy array.
- 
-         Parameters
-         ----------
-         T : array-like of shape (n_samples,) or (n_samples, 1)
-             Data to transform.
- 
-+        Returns
-+        -------
-+        y_pred : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
-+            The transformed data.
-+
-         .. versionadded:: 0.24
-            Also accepts 2d array with 1 feature.
-+        """
-+        T = validate_data(self, T, ensure_2d=False, dtype=np.float64, reset=False)
-+        return np.interp(T, self.X_thresholds_, self.y_thresholds_)
-+
-+    @_fit_context(prefer_skip_nested_validation=True)
-+    def transform(self, T):
-+        """Transform new data by linear interpolation.
-+
-+        Parameters
-+        ----------
-+        T : array-like of shape (n_samples,) or (n_samples, 1)
-+            Data to transform.
- 
-         Returns
-         -------
-         y_pred : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
-             The transformed data.
-@@ -384,13 +399,11 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-              2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
-              4.5 4.5 4.5]
- 
-         Note that the returned value is clipped to the range [0.0, 1.0].
-         """
--        T = validate_data(self, T, ensure_2d=False, dtype=np.float64, reset=False)
--        return np.interp(T, self.X_thresholds_, self.y_thresholds_)
-+        return self._transform(T)
- 
--    @_fit_context(prefer_skip_nested_validation=True)
-     def predict(self, T):
-         """Predict new data by linear interpolation.
- 
-         Parameters
-         ----------
-@@ -406,11 +419,11 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
- 
-             >>> iso_reg = IsotonicRegression().fit(x, y)
-             >>> iso_reg.predict(x)
-             array([1.5, 1.5, 3. , 3. , 5. , 5. ])
-         """
--        return self.transform(T)
-+        return self._transform(T)
- 
-     def __getstate__(self):
-         """Pickle-protocol - return state of the estimator."""
-         state = super().__getstate__()
-         # remove interpolation method

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25570.patch

@@ -1,71 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25570
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-Based on the issue and the architect's analysis, I need to generate a patch for the `_column_transformer.py` file in scikit-learn. The issue is that when using pandas output with `ColumnTransformer`, transformers with 0 features cause a mismatch between the number of columns and the feature names.
-
-Based on the architect's analysis, the fix should be in the `_hstack` method around lines 856-862. The issue is that `_iter(fitted=True)` skips unfitted transformers (those with 0 features), but `get_feature_names_out()` doesn't account for this properly.
-
-Let me generate the patch based on the standard scikit-learn source code structure:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-+++ b/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-@@ -853,11 +853,17 @@ class ColumnTransformer(TransformerMixin, _BaseComposition):
-             output = pd.concat(Xs, axis=1)
- 
-             # If all transformers define `get_feature_names_out`, then transform
--            # will return a DataFrame. We use the column names from the original
--            # fit to assign names to the DataFrame columns.
--            names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(
--                list(self._iter(fitted=True))
--            )
-+            # will return a DataFrame. We use the column names from the transformers
-+            # that actually produced output (have features).
-+            transformer_with_feature_names_out = [
-+                (name, trans, columns)
-+                for name, trans, columns in self._iter(fitted=True)
-+                if hasattr(trans, "get_feature_names_out")
-+                or trans == "passthrough"
-+                and len(_get_column_indices(self._feature_names_in, columns)) > 0
-+            ]
-+            names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(transformer_with_feature_names_out)
-             output.columns = names_out
-             return output
-```
-
-Wait, let me reconsider the issue more carefully. The problem is that:
-
-1. When a transformer has 0 features, it doesn't get fitted (it's skipped)
-2. `_iter(fitted=True)` correctly skips these unfitted transformers
-3. However, `get_feature_names_out()` might still be called for these transformers or there's a mismatch somewhere
-
-Looking at the error more closely: "Length mismatch: Expected axis has 3 elements, new values have 0 elements" - this means `names_out` has 0 elements but the output DataFrame has 3 columns.
-
-The actual issue seems to be that `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out` is receiving transformers from `_iter(fitted=True)`, but somehow the feature names are not being generated correctly. Let me look at the standard pattern in scikit-learn.
-
-After analyzing the issue, the fix should filter out transformers that have zero output features when computing names_out:
-
---- a/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-+++ b/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-@@ -853,9 +853,15 @@ class ColumnTransformer(TransformerMixin, _BaseComposition):
-             output = pd.concat(Xs, axis=1)
- 
-             # If all transformers define `get_feature_names_out`, then transform
--            # will return a DataFrame. We use the column names from the original
--            # fit to assign names to the DataFrame columns.
--            names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(
--                list(self._iter(fitted=True))
--            )
-+            # will return a DataFrame. We use the column names from transformers
-+            # that produced output. Filter out transformers with no features.
-+            transformer_list = []
-+            for name, trans, columns in self._iter(fitted=True):
-+                n_features = len(
-+                    _get_column_indices(self._feature_names_in, columns)
-+                )
-+                if n_features > 0:
-+                    transformer_list.append((name, trans, columns))
-+            names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(transformer_list)
-             output.columns = names_out
-             return output

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25638.patch

@@ -1,70 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25638
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
-The scikit-learn repository is not available locally. Based on the architect's analysis, I'll generate the patch for the `sklearn/utils/multiclass.py` file in the scikit-learn repository. The fix needs to handle nullable pandas dtypes in the `type_of_target` function.
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-@@ -254,6 +254,24 @@ def type_of_target(y, input_name=""):
-     if hasattr(y, "__array__") or is_array_api:
-         y = np.asarray(y)
- 
-+    # Handle pandas nullable dtypes (Int8, Int16, Int32, Int64, UInt8, UInt16,
-+    # UInt32, UInt64, Float32, Float64, boolean) by converting to the
-+    # corresponding numpy dtype. These nullable dtypes otherwise become object
-+    # dtype when converted via np.asarray(), causing type detection to fail.
-+    if hasattr(y_orig, "dtype"):
-+        dtype_name = str(y_orig.dtype)
-+        if dtype_name in {
-+            "Int8", "Int16", "Int32", "Int64",
-+            "UInt8", "UInt16", "UInt32", "UInt64",
-+            "Float32", "Float64", "boolean",
-+        }:
-+            # Convert to numpy array with proper dtype
-+            # NA values will become NaN for float types
-+            if dtype_name == "boolean":
-+                y = y_orig.to_numpy(dtype="float64", na_value=np.nan)
-+            else:
-+                y = y_orig.to_numpy(dtype=dtype_name.lower(), na_value=np.nan)
-+
-     # The old sequence of sequences format
-     try:
-         if (
-```
-
-Wait, I need to look at the actual scikit-learn source to provide an accurate patch. Let me generate the patch based on the standard sklearn source structure:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-@@ -252,6 +252,27 @@ def type_of_target(y, input_name=""):
-     # XXX: is there a way to duck-type this condition?
-     is_array_api = get_namespace(y)[0].__name__ != "numpy"
- 
-+    # Handle pandas nullable dtypes (Int8, Int16, Int32, Int64, UInt8, UInt16,
-+    # UInt32, UInt64, Float32, Float64, boolean) by converting to the
-+    # corresponding numpy dtype. These nullable dtypes otherwise become object
-+    # dtype when converted via np.asarray(), causing type detection to fail.
-+    pandas_nullable_dtypes = {
-+        "Int8", "Int16", "Int32", "Int64",
-+        "UInt8", "UInt16", "UInt32", "UInt64",
-+        "Float32", "Float64", "boolean",
-+    }
-+    if hasattr(y, "dtype"):
-+        dtype_name = str(y.dtype)
-+        if dtype_name in pandas_nullable_dtypes:
-+            # Convert to numpy array with proper dtype
-+            # NA values will become NaN for float types
-+            if dtype_name == "boolean":
-+                y = y.to_numpy(dtype="float64", na_value=np.nan)
-+            elif dtype_name.startswith(("Int", "UInt")):
-+                y = y.to_numpy(dtype="float64", na_value=np.nan)
-+            else:
-+                y = y.to_numpy(dtype=dtype_name.lower(), na_value=np.nan)
-+
-     if hasattr(y, "__array__") or is_array_api:
-         y = np.asarray(y)
- 
-```

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-10-37-54/swebench-loki-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25747.patch

@@ -1,14 +0,0 @@
-# scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25747
-# Loki Mode Multi-Agent Patch
-# Attempts: 1
-
---- a/sklearn/utils/_set_output.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/_set_output.py
-@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def _wrap_in_pandas_container(
-     if isinstance(data_to_wrap, pd.DataFrame):
-         if columns is not None:
-             data_to_wrap.columns = columns
--        if index is not None:
-+        if index is not None and len(index) == len(data_to_wrap):
-             data_to_wrap.index = index
-         return data_to_wrap