wegho-agentes 7.0.4 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13439.patch

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue description, I need to provide a patch for the scikit-learn Pipeline class to implement `__len__`. Let me create a patch based on the standard scikit-learn codebase structure. The Pipeline class is in `sklearn/pipeline.py` and I need to add a `__len__` method that returns the number of steps in the pipeline.
-
-Looking at the issue:
-- Pipeline supports indexing with `pipe[:len(pipe)]`
-- But `len(pipe)` raises an error because `__len__` is not implemented
-- The fix is to add a `__len__` method that returns the number of steps
-
-Based on the scikit-learn Pipeline implementation, the steps are stored in `self.steps` which is a list of (name, estimator) tuples. The `__len__` method should return the length of this list.
-
---- a/sklearn/pipeline.py
-+++ b/sklearn/pipeline.py
-@@ -155,6 +155,10 @@ class Pipeline(_BaseComposition):
-     def __getitem__(self, ind):
-         """Returns a sub-pipeline or a single esimtator in the pipeline
- 
-+        Indexing with an integer will return an estimator; using a slice
-+        returns another Pipeline instance copying a slice of the estimators
-+        list.
-+        """
-         if isinstance(ind, slice):
-             if ind.step not in (1, None):
-                 raise ValueError('Pipeline slicing only supports a step of 1')
-@@ -162,6 +166,10 @@ class Pipeline(_BaseComposition):
-         try:
-             return self.steps[ind][1]
-         except TypeError:
-             return self.named_steps[ind]
- 
-+    def __len__(self):
-+        """Returns the length of the Pipeline"""
-+        return len(self.steps)
-+
-     @property
-     def _estimator_type(self):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13496.patch

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of scikit-learn's codebase structure and the issue description, I can generate the patch. The IsolationForest is located in `sklearn/ensemble/iforest.py` (or `sklearn/ensemble/_iforest.py` in newer versions). Based on the issue, I need to:
-
-1. Add `warm_start` parameter to `IsolationForest.__init__()`
-2. Document it properly
-3. Add a test for warm_start functionality
-
-Let me create the patch based on the known structure of scikit-learn's IsolationForest:
-
---- a/sklearn/ensemble/iforest.py
-+++ b/sklearn/ensemble/iforest.py
-@@ -120,6 +120,12 @@ class IsolationForest(BaseBagging, OutlierMixin):
-     verbose : int, optional (default=0)
-         Controls the verbosity of the tree building process.
- 
-+    warm_start : bool, optional (default=False)
-+        When set to ``True``, reuse the solution of the previous call to fit
-+        and add more estimators to the ensemble, otherwise, just fit a whole
-+        new forest. See :term:`the Glossary <warm_start>`.
-+
-+
-     Attributes
-     ----------
-     estimators_ : list of DecisionTreeClassifier
-@@ -173,7 +179,8 @@ class IsolationForest(BaseBagging, OutlierMixin):
-                  max_features=1.,
-                  bootstrap=False,
-                  n_jobs=None,
--                 random_state=None,
-+                 random_state=None,
-+                 warm_start=False,
-                  verbose=0):
-         super().__init__(
-             base_estimator=ExtraTreeRegressor(
-@@ -186,6 +193,7 @@ class IsolationForest(BaseBagging, OutlierMixin):
-             n_estimators=n_estimators,
-             max_samples=max_samples,
-             max_features=max_features,
-+            warm_start=warm_start,
-             n_jobs=n_jobs,
-             random_state=random_state,
-             verbose=verbose)
---- a/sklearn/ensemble/tests/test_iforest.py
-+++ b/sklearn/ensemble/tests/test_iforest.py
-@@ -217,3 +217,15 @@ def test_iforest_chunks_works2(
-     assert_array_equal(
-         pred_scores,
-         iforest.score_samples(X))
-+
-+
-+def test_iforest_warm_start():
-+    """Test that warm_start works as expected."""
-+    X, y = iris.data, iris.target
-+
-+    # Test warm_start
-+    clf = IsolationForest(n_estimators=5, warm_start=True, random_state=0)
-+    clf.fit(X)
-+    clf.n_estimators = 10
-+    clf.fit(X)
-+    assert len(clf.estimators_) == 10

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13497.patch

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I understand the problem. In scikit-learn's `_estimate_mi` function, there's a comparison `discrete_features == 'auto'` that will fail when `discrete_features` is an array (numpy array or list) because comparing an array to a string produces a boolean array, not a single boolean value. This will cause issues in future numpy versions.
-
-The fix is to use `isinstance()` to check if `discrete_features` is a string before doing the comparison. Let me create the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/feature_selection/_mutual_info.py
-+++ b/sklearn/feature_selection/_mutual_info.py
-@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ def _estimate_mi(X, y, discrete_features='auto', discrete_target=False,
-     n_samples, n_features = X.shape
-     X = X.astype(float, copy=False)
- 
--    if discrete_features == 'auto':
-+    if isinstance(discrete_features, str) and discrete_features == 'auto':
-         discrete_features = issparse(X)
- 
-     if isinstance(discrete_features, bool):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13584.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-I can see the buggy code at lines 95-98. The problem is on line 95-96:
-
-```python
-    for k, v in params.items():
-        if (v != init_params[k] and
-                not (is_scalar_nan(init_params[k]) and is_scalar_nan(v))):
-```
-
-When `v` is a numpy array, `v != init_params[k]` returns an array of boolean values, and using that in an `if` statement causes the ValueError.
-
-The fix changes `v != init_params[k]` to `repr(v) != repr(init_params[k])`.
-
-Now I can generate the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/utils/_pprint.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/_pprint.py
-@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ def _changed_params(estimator):
-     init_params = signature(init_func).parameters
-     init_params = {name: param.default for name, param in init_params.items()}
-     for k, v in params.items():
--        if (v != init_params[k] and
-+        if (repr(v) != repr(init_params[k]) and
-                 not (is_scalar_nan(init_params[k]) and is_scalar_nan(v))):
-             filtered_params[k] = v
-     return filtered_params

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-13779.patch

@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I need to provide a patch for scikit-learn's VotingClassifier/VotingRegressor. The bug is that when `sample_weight` is passed and an estimator is set to `None`, the fit method fails because it doesn't check for `None` estimators before checking sample_weight support.
-
-From my knowledge of scikit-learn's codebase, the issue is in `sklearn/ensemble/_voting.py`. The `fit` method checks if estimators support `sample_weight` but doesn't filter out `None` estimators first.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/ensemble/_voting.py
-+++ b/sklearn/ensemble/_voting.py
-@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ class _BaseVoting(TransformerMixin, _BaseHeterogeneousEnsemble):
- 
-         if sample_weight is not None:
-             for name, step in self.estimators:
--                if not has_fit_parameter(step, 'sample_weight'):
-+                if step is not None and not has_fit_parameter(step, 'sample_weight'):
-                     raise ValueError('Underlying estimator \'%s\' does not'
-                                      ' support sample weights.' % name)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14087.patch

@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of this specific scikit-learn bug, I can provide the fix. This is a known issue (#14087) in scikit-learn 0.21.x where the `coefs_paths` array has incorrect dimensions when `refit=False` due to a change in how the coefficients were stored.
-
-The bug is in the `fit` method of `LogisticRegressionCV`. When `refit=False`, the code tries to average coefficients across folds using:
-```python
-w = np.mean([coefs_paths[:, i, best_indices[i], :]
-             for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
-```
-
-But `coefs_paths` in the multi-class case (when using OvR) has shape `(n_folds, n_cs, n_features)` for binary or `(n_classes, n_folds, n_cs, n_features)` for multiclass. The issue is that in the binary case, `coefs_paths` is 3D, not 4D.
-
-The fix involves checking the number of dimensions of `coefs_paths` and handling the binary classification case (where there's effectively only one class) differently from the multiclass case.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/linear_model/logistic.py
-+++ b/sklearn/linear_model/logistic.py
-@@ -2189,9 +2189,15 @@ class LogisticRegressionCV(LogisticRegression, BaseEstimator,
-                 if self.multi_class == 'multinomial':
-                     w = np.mean([coefs_paths[i, best_indices[i], :]
-                                  for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
-                 else:
--                    w = np.mean([coefs_paths[:, i, best_indices[i], :]
--                                 for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
-+                    if coefs_paths.ndim == 3:
-+                        # Binary classification case: coefs_paths has shape
-+                        # (n_folds, n_cs, n_features)
-+                        w = np.mean([coefs_paths[i, best_indices[i], :]
-+                                     for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
-+                    else:
-+                        w = np.mean([coefs_paths[:, i, best_indices[i], :]
-+                                     for i in range(len(folds))], axis=0)
- 
-                 best_indices_C = best_indices % len(self.Cs_)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14092.patch

@@ -1,35 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I can understand the problem and create the appropriate patch. The issue is that NCA's `_check_params` method checks parameters too strictly:
-1. It checks `isinstance(tol, float)` which fails when `tol=1` (an int)
-2. It checks `isinstance(n_components, int)` which fails when `n_components` is `np.int64`
-
-The fix is to use `numbers.Integral` and `numbers.Real` from the `numbers` module instead of `int` and `float` directly. This is the standard Python approach to accept any numeric type that behaves like an integer or real number.
-
-Based on the issue description and standard scikit-learn patterns, here's the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/neighbors/_nca.py
-+++ b/sklearn/neighbors/_nca.py
-@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ from ..decomposition import PCA
- from ..utils.multiclass import check_classification_targets
- from ..utils.validation import check_is_fitted, check_array
- from ..utils._readonly_array_wrapper import ReadonlyArrayWrapper
-+import numbers
- 
- 
- class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-@@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-         # Check the preferred dimensionality of the projected space
-         if self.n_components is not None:
--            if not isinstance(self.n_components, int):
-+            if not isinstance(self.n_components, numbers.Integral):
-                 raise TypeError("n_components must be an integer.")
-             if self.n_components < 1:
-                 raise ValueError("n_components must be at least 1.")
-@@ -305,7 +306,7 @@ class NeighborhoodComponentsAnalysis(TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
- 
-         # Check the convergence tolerance
-         if self.tol is not None:
--            if not isinstance(self.tol, float):
-+            if not isinstance(self.tol, numbers.Real):
-                 raise TypeError("tol must be a float.")
-             if self.tol < 0:
-                 raise ValueError("tol must be a non-negative float.")

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14894.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Based on the research, I can now generate the patch. The fix is to check if `n_SV` (number of support vectors) is 0 before performing the division that causes the ZeroDivisionError.
-
---- a/sklearn/svm/base.py
-+++ b/sklearn/svm/base.py
-@@ -297,10 +297,14 @@ class BaseLibSVM(BaseEstimator, metaclass=ABCMeta):
-             n_class = 1
-         n_SV = self.support_vectors_.shape[0]
- 
-         dual_coef_indices = np.tile(np.arange(n_SV), n_class)
--        dual_coef_indptr = np.arange(0, dual_coef_indices.size + 1,
--                                     dual_coef_indices.size / n_class)
--        self.dual_coef_ = sp.csr_matrix(
--            (dual_coef_data, dual_coef_indices, dual_coef_indptr),
--            (n_class, n_SV))
-+        if not n_SV:
-+            self.dual_coef_ = sp.csr_matrix([])
-+        else:
-+            dual_coef_indptr = np.arange(0, dual_coef_indices.size + 1,
-+                                         dual_coef_indices.size / n_class)
-+            self.dual_coef_ = sp.csr_matrix(
-+                (dual_coef_data, dual_coef_indices, dual_coef_indptr),
-+                (n_class, n_SV))
- 
-         def predict(self, X):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-14983.patch

@@ -1,23 +0,0 @@
-Now I have all the information I need. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-+++ b/sklearn/model_selection/_split.py
-@@ -1170,6 +1170,9 @@ class _RepeatedSplits(metaclass=ABCMeta):
-                      **self.cvargs)
-         return cv.get_n_splits(X, y, groups) * self.n_repeats
- 
-+    def __repr__(self):
-+        return _build_repr(self)
-+
- 
- class RepeatedKFold(_RepeatedSplits):
-     """Repeated K-Fold cross validator.
-@@ -2152,6 +2155,8 @@ def _build_repr(self):
-         try:
-             with warnings.catch_warnings(record=True) as w:
-                 value = getattr(self, key, None)
-+                if value is None and hasattr(self, 'cvargs'):
-+                    value = self.cvargs.get(key, None)
-             if len(w) and w[0].category == DeprecationWarning:
-                 # if the parameter is deprecated, don't show it
-                 continue

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15512.patch

@@ -1,77 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the scikit-learn codebase and the issue described, I can provide the patch. The issue is in the `affinity_propagation_.py` file where when the algorithm doesn't converge, it should return empty cluster centers and -1 labels as documented, but instead returns the last iteration's results.
-
-Looking at the standard scikit-learn 0.20.x implementation, the fix needs to:
-1. Add a convergence check after the main iteration loop
-2. When not converged, set `cluster_centers_indices` to empty array and `labels` to -1
-
-Here's the patch:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-+++ b/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-@@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-         Cluster labels for each point.
- 
-     cluster_centers_indices : array, shape (n_clusters,)
-+        Index of clusters centers.
-+
-+    n_iter : int
-+        Number of iterations run.
-+
-+    References
-+    ----------
-+    Brendan J. Frey and Delbert Dueck, "Clustering by Passing Messages
-         Index of clusters centers
- 
-     n_iter : int
-@@ -195,6 +203,15 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             if verbose:
-                 print("Converged after %d iterations." % it)
-             break
-+    else:
-+        if verbose:
-+            print("Did not converge")
-+
-+    I = np.flatnonzero(E)
-+    K = I.size  # Identify exemplars
-+
-+    if K > 0 and not unconverged:
-+        c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
-     else:
-         if verbose:
-             print("Did not converge")
-```
-
-Let me provide a cleaner, more accurate patch based on the actual sklearn 0.20.x codebase structure:
-
---- a/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-+++ b/sklearn/cluster/affinity_propagation_.py
-@@ -195,11 +195,23 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-             if verbose:
-                 print("Converged after %d iterations." % it)
-             break
-     else:
-+        it += 1
-         if verbose:
-             print("Did not converge")
- 
-     I = np.flatnonzero(E)
-     K = I.size  # Identify exemplars
- 
--    if K > 0:
-+    if K > 0 and it < max_iter:
-         c = np.argmax(S[:, I], axis=1)
-         c[I] = np.arange(K)  # Identify clusters
-         # Refine the final set of exemplars and clusters andடுreturn results
-@@ -213,8 +225,12 @@ def affinity_propagation(S, preference=None, convergence_iter=15, max_iter=200,
-         labels = np.empty((n_samples, 1))
-         cluster_centers_indices = None
-         labels.fill(np.nan)
-     else:
-+        warnings.warn("Affinity propagation did not converge, this model "
-+                      "will not have any cluster centers.", ConvergenceWarning)
-+        cluster_centers_indices = np.array([])
-+        labels = np.array([-1] * n_samples)
- 
-     if return_n_iter:
-         return cluster_centers_indices, labels, it + 1

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-15535.patch

@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, I understand the problem:
-
-1. The regression was introduced in PR #10830
-2. The issue is that `mutual_info_score` with object dtype arrays containing strings fails with "ValueError: could not convert string to float: 'b'"
-3. Previously (0.21.1), this worked without a warning
-
-The problem is in the `check_clusterings` function in `sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py`. The PR #10830 likely added input validation using `check_array` which by default tries to convert to float, but clustering metrics should accept categorical/label data including strings.
-
-Let me create the patch based on my understanding of the sklearn codebase and this issue:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-+++ b/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-@@ -40,8 +40,6 @@ def check_clusterings(labels_true, labels_pred):
-     labels_true : array-like of shape (n_samples,)
-         The true labels.
-     labels_pred : array-like of shape (n_samples,)
-         The predicted labels.
-     """
--    labels_true = check_array(labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
--    labels_pred = check_array(labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
-+    labels_true = check_array(labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
-+    labels_pred = check_array(labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
- 
-     # input checks
-```
-
-The fix is to add `dtype=None` to the `check_array` calls, which prevents the automatic conversion to float and allows string/object arrays to pass through.
-
---- a/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-+++ b/sklearn/metrics/cluster/_supervised.py
-@@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ def check_clusterings(labels_true, labels_pred):
-     labels_pred : array-like of shape (n_samples,)
-         The predicted labels.
-     """
--    labels_true = check_array(labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
--    labels_pred = check_array(labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0)
-+    labels_true = check_array(
-+        labels_true, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
-+    labels_pred = check_array(
-+        labels_pred, ensure_2d=False, ensure_min_samples=0, dtype=None)
- 
-     # input checks
-     if labels_true.ndim != 1:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25500.patch

@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of scikit-learn's codebase and the issue description, I can generate the appropriate patch. The issue is in `sklearn/isotonic.py` where the `predict` method calls `transform`, which when pandas output is enabled, returns a DataFrame/Series instead of a numpy array.
-
-The fix is to:
-1. Create a private `_transform` method that contains the core transformation logic
-2. Have the public `transform` method call `_transform`
-3. Have `predict` call `_transform` directly to bypass the pandas output wrapper
-
---- a/sklearn/isotonic.py
-+++ b/sklearn/isotonic.py
-@@ -360,7 +360,20 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
- 
-         return self
- 
--    def transform(self, T):
-+    def _transform(self, T):
-+        """Transform data using the fitted isotonic regression model.
-+
-+        Private method that always returns numpy arrays.
-+        Used internally by both transform() and predict().
-+
-+        Parameters
-+        ----------
-+        T : array-like of shape (n_samples,) or (n_samples, 1)
-+            Data to transform.
-+
-+        Returns
-+        -------
-+        y_pred : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
-+            Transformed data.
-+        """
-         """Transform new data by linear interpolation.
- 
-         Parameters
-@@ -387,6 +400,26 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-             return res
-         return res.reshape(T.shape)
- 
-+    def transform(self, T):
-+        """Transform new data by linear interpolation.
-+
-+        Parameters
-+        ----------
-+        T : array-like of shape (n_samples,) or (n_samples, 1)
-+            Data to transform.
-+
-+            .. versionchanged:: 0.24
-+               Also accepts 2d array with 1 feature.
-+
-+        Returns
-+        -------
-+        y_pred : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
-+            The transformed data.
-+        """
-+        return self._transform(T)
-+
-     def predict(self, T):
-         """Predict new data by linear interpolation.
- 
-@@ -404,4 +437,4 @@ class IsotonicRegression(RegressorMixin, TransformerMixin, BaseEstimator):
-         y_pred : ndarray of shape (n_samples,)
-             Transformed data.
-         """
--        return self.transform(T)
-+        return self._transform(T)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25570.patch

@@ -1,96 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and my knowledge of scikit-learn's ColumnTransformer, I can analyze the bug and create the fix. The issue is in the `_hstack` method of `_column_transformer.py` where the pandas output handling doesn't properly account for transformers with zero features.
-
-Looking at the traceback:
-1. Line 750: `fit_transform` calls `self._hstack(list(Xs))`
-2. Line 862: `output.columns = names_out` - This is where the error occurs
-
-The bug is that when generating feature names for pandas output, `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out` uses `self._iter(fitted=True)` which skips transformers with 0 features (because they're not fitted). But `Xs` may still have empty arrays for those transformers that were included in the horizontal stacking.
-
-Let me create the patch based on the scikit-learn version 1.2.0 mentioned in the issue:
-
-```
---- a/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-+++ b/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-@@ -850,10 +850,11 @@ class ColumnTransformer(TransformerMixin, _BaseComposition):
-             output = pd.concat(Xs, axis=1)
- 
-             # If all transformers define `get_feature_names_out`, then transform
--            # will adjust the column names to be consistent with `get_feature_names_out`.
--            # Otherwise column names will be `output.columns`.
-+            # will adjust the column names to be consistent with
-+            # `get_feature_names_out`. Otherwise column names will be
-+            # `output.columns`.
-             if not self._feature_names_out_for_transform:
-                 return output
- 
-             names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(
--                list(self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True))
-+                list(self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True, column_as_labels=False))
-             )
-             output.columns = names_out
-             return output
-```
-
-Wait, I need to look at this more carefully. The issue is that when `Xs` contains results from all transformers (including those with 0 features which produce empty outputs), but `_iter(fitted=True)` only returns fitted transformers, there's a mismatch.
-
-Let me analyze the actual code flow based on the error message:
-- `_hstack` receives `Xs` (list of transformed outputs)
-- For pandas output, it needs to set column names
-- `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out` gets the names from `_iter(fitted=True)`
-- But transformers with 0 features aren't fitted, so they don't appear in `_iter(fitted=True)`
-
-The fix should ensure that when getting feature names for pandas output, we properly handle transformers that have 0 features. The key insight from the traceback is that `names_out` has 0 elements while `output` has 3 elements - this suggests `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out` is returning an empty list when it should return names for the numerical features.
-
-Looking at scikit-learn 1.2.x, the issue is in how `_iter` is called. When a transformer has no columns to transform, it produces no output, but the iteration still needs to align with what's actually produced.
-
-The fix should be in the `_hstack` method to properly zip the transformed arrays with the iteration results. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-+++ b/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-@@ -853,11 +853,15 @@ class ColumnTransformer(TransformerMixin, _BaseComposition):
-             # will adjust the column names to be consistent with
-             # `get_feature_names_out`. Otherwise column names will be
-             # `output.columns`.
--            if not self._feature_names_out_for_transform:
-+            if not self._feature_names_out:
-                 return output
- 
-             names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(
--                list(self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True))
-+                list(
-+                    (name, trans, columns)
-+                    for name, trans, columns in self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True)
-+                    if len(columns) > 0
-+                )
-             )
-             output.columns = names_out
-             return output
-
-Actually, looking at this more carefully, I realize the root issue is different. Let me trace through what happens:
-
-1. When `fit_transform` is called, it fits and transforms each transformer
-2. For transformers with 0 features, they are skipped in fitting
-3. In `_hstack`, `Xs` contains only the outputs from transformers that actually produced output
-4. But `_iter(fitted=True)` may return different transformers than what's in `Xs`
-
-The fix needs to ensure alignment between what's in `Xs` and what's iterated over in `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out`.
-
-Looking at the actual scikit-learn code structure for version 1.2.0, the issue is in `_hstack`. When calling `_add_prefix_for_feature_names_out`, we need to filter to only include transformers that actually produced output (i.e., have features).
-
-Here's the correct patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-+++ b/sklearn/compose/_column_transformer.py
-@@ -856,7 +856,11 @@ class ColumnTransformer(TransformerMixin, _BaseComposition):
-                 return output
- 
-             names_out = self._add_prefix_for_feature_names_out(
--                list(self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True))
-+                list(
-+                    (name, trans, columns)
-+                    for name, trans, columns in self._iter(fitted=True, replace_strings=True)
-+                    if len(columns) > 0
-+                )
-             )
-             output.columns = names_out
-             return output

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25638.patch

@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue and my knowledge of the scikit-learn codebase, I can provide the patch. The issue is that nullable pandas dtypes ("Int64", "Float64", "boolean") are not properly handled when converted to numpy arrays - they become `object` dtype instead of proper numeric types. 
-
-The fix needs to be in `sklearn/utils/multiclass.py` where the `type_of_target` function needs to handle the conversion of pandas nullable dtypes before checking the type.
-
---- a/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-@@ -155,6 +155,19 @@ def unique_labels(*ys):
-     if not ys:
-         raise ValueError("No argument has been passed.")
-     # Check that we don't mix label format
-+
-+    ys = [_convert_nullable_pandas(y) for y in ys]
-+
-+    return _unique_labels(*ys)
-+
-+
-+def _convert_nullable_pandas(y):
-+    """Convert nullable pandas dtypes to numpy arrays with proper dtype."""
-+    xp, _ = get_namespace(y)
-+    if hasattr(y, "dtype") and hasattr(y.dtype, "name"):
-+        dtype_name = y.dtype.name
-+        if dtype_name in ("Int8", "Int16", "Int32", "Int64"):
-+            return xp.asarray(y, dtype="int64")
-+        elif dtype_name in ("UInt8", "UInt16", "UInt32", "UInt64"):
-+            return xp.asarray(y, dtype="uint64")
-+        elif dtype_name in ("Float32", "Float64"):
-+            return xp.asarray(y, dtype="float64")
-+        elif dtype_name == "boolean":
-+            return xp.asarray(y, dtype="bool")
-+    return y
-
-Let me look at this more carefully. The actual fix should handle the conversion in `type_of_target` since that's where the dtype checking happens.
-
---- a/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/multiclass.py
-@@ -256,6 +256,20 @@ def type_of_target(y, input_name=""):
-     >>> type_of_target([1, 0, 2])
-     'multiclass'
-     """
-+    # Handle nullable pandas dtypes by converting to appropriate numpy dtype
-+    if hasattr(y, "dtype") and hasattr(y.dtype, "name"):
-+        dtype_name = y.dtype.name
-+        if dtype_name in ("Int8", "Int16", "Int32", "Int64"):
-+            y = np.asarray(y, dtype=np.int64)
-+        elif dtype_name in ("UInt8", "UInt16", "UInt32", "UInt64"):
-+            y = np.asarray(y, dtype=np.uint64)
-+        elif dtype_name in ("Float32", "Float64"):
-+            y = np.asarray(y, dtype=np.float64)
-+        elif dtype_name == "boolean":
-+            y = np.asarray(y, dtype=bool)
-+
-     xp, is_array_api = get_namespace(y)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/scikit-learn__scikit-learn-25747.patch

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue description and traceback, I can analyze the problem directly. The issue is in `sklearn/utils/_set_output.py` in the `_wrap_in_pandas_container` function. Let me analyze the traceback:
-
-1. The error occurs in `_wrap_in_pandas_container` at line 59: `data_to_wrap.index = index`
-2. The problem is when a transformer returns a DataFrame with a different number of rows (aggregated data), the code tries to assign the original input's index to the output DataFrame
-3. This fails because the number of elements don't match (4 elements in output vs 96 in original input)
-
-Looking at the traceback and the hint in the issue:
-- The code at lines 55-62 in `_set_output.py` checks if `data_to_wrap` is already a DataFrame
-- If it is, and `index is not None`, it overwrites the DataFrame's index with the original input's index
-- This breaks when the transformer aggregates data (changes row count)
-
-The fix should be to NOT overwrite the index when the DataFrame already has an index that doesn't match the length of the new index. According to the hints:
-
-> In principle, we can have a less restrictive requirement and only set the index if it is not defined.
-
-The solution is to check if the lengths match before attempting to set the index, OR simply not set the index when the data is already a DataFrame (since it already has its own index from the transformer).
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/sklearn/utils/_set_output.py
-+++ b/sklearn/utils/_set_output.py
-@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ def _wrap_in_pandas_container(
-     if isinstance(data_to_wrap, pd.DataFrame):
-         if columns is not None:
-             data_to_wrap.columns = columns
--        if index is not None:
-+        if index is not None and len(index) == len(data_to_wrap):
-             data_to_wrap.index = index
-         return data_to_wrap