wegho-agentes 7.0.4 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-22714.patch

@@ -1,486 +0,0 @@
-The sympy codebase is not in this directory. Since this is a GitHub issue from the sympy/sympy repository, I need to understand the issue based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase. Let me analyze the error and provide a patch.
-
-Based on the error traceback and my understanding of the SymPy codebase:
-
-1. The error occurs in `sympy/geometry/point.py` at line 153 in the `Point.__new__` method
-2. The issue is that when `evaluate(False)` is active, the `is_real` property of coordinates returns `None` (unknown) instead of `True`
-3. The check `if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords)` is failing because with `evaluate(False)`, the `im(a)` function doesn't properly evaluate
-
-The issue is that when `evaluate(False)` context is active, the `im(a).is_zero` check returns `None` instead of `True` for real integer values, because the imaginary part computation doesn't simplify/evaluate.
-
-Looking at the code flow:
-1. `Point2D.__new__` calls `Point.__new__`
-2. `Point.__new__` checks if coordinates are imaginary 
-3. When `evaluate(False)` is set globally, `im(Integer(1))` returns an unevaluated `im(1)` instead of `0`
-4. The check `im(a).is_zero is False` becomes `None is False` which is `True` (incorrectly)
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. The condition `im(a).is_zero is False` means:
-- If `im(a).is_zero` is `True` -> condition is `False` (good, not imaginary)
-- If `im(a).is_zero` is `False` -> condition is `True` (bad, is imaginary)
-- If `im(a).is_zero` is `None` -> condition is `False` (not matching, but this should be fine)
-
-Let me think about this differently. The error says "Imaginary coordinates are not permitted", which means the code thinks the coordinates ARE imaginary. With `evaluate(False)`, `im(Integer(1))` might not be evaluated to `0`, so when checking `is_zero`, it could return `None`, and the logic might be different.
-
-Actually, looking more carefully at the error, the issue is likely that when `evaluate(False)` is active:
-- `im(a)` doesn't evaluate to `0` for real numbers
-- Instead it stays as `im(1)` unevaluated
-- The check `im(a).is_zero` returns `None` (unknown) 
-- But the existing code might check `not is_zero` or similar which would trigger the error
-
-Let me reconsider the check pattern. The code likely has:
-
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-With `evaluate(False)`:
-- `Integer(1).is_number` returns `True` 
-- `im(Integer(1))` with evaluate=False returns an unevaluated `im(1)` 
-- `im(1).is_zero` returns `None` (can't determine without evaluation)
-- `None is False` is `False`, so this shouldn't trigger...
-
-Wait, let me check another possibility. The code might be:
-
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and not im(a).is_zero for a in coords):
-```
-
-With this:
-- `not None` is `True`
-- So this would trigger the error
-
-Or the code might be checking `is_real`:
-
-```python
-if any(coord.is_real is False for coord in coords):
-```
-
-With `evaluate(False)`:
-- `Integer(1).is_real` might return `None` instead of `True`
-
-Actually, I recall that `Integer` should always have `is_real = True` regardless of evaluate context because it's a property, not a computed value.
-
-The issue must be in how the coordinates are being processed. When parsing with `evaluate(False)`, the expression `Integer(1)` might not be properly simplified.
-
-Looking at line 153 more carefully based on the error - the issue is likely that the coordinates are being sympified and during that process with evaluate=False, something goes wrong.
-
-Let me provide the fix based on the standard SymPy pattern - the fix should ensure that coordinate validation doesn't depend on the global evaluate context:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-             coords = coords[0]
- 
-         # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
--        coords = Tuple(*coords)
-+        coords = Tuple(*coords, evaluate=False)
-         evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', global_parameters.evaluate)
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-@@ -150,7 +150,9 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
- 
-         # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
-         coords = Tuple(*coords)
--        evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', global_parameters.evaluate)
-+        evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', True) if 'evaluate' in kwargs else \
-+            global_parameters.evaluate
-+
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
-
-Actually, I need to look at this from a different angle. The issue is that when checking for imaginary coordinates, the `im()` function or `is_real` property doesn't work correctly under `evaluate(False)` context.
-
-The fix should make the coordinate validation happen with evaluation enabled, regardless of the global context. Here's the proper fix:
-
-```python
-# When checking coordinates, we need to evaluate them to determine if they're real
-with evaluate(True):
-    if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-        raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-But actually, looking at this issue more carefully, the real problem is that the `is_number` property should return `True` for `Integer(1)` but when used with unevaluated expressions, there might be an issue.
-
-Let me write a more targeted fix. The issue is that the check for imaginary coordinates should be done with evaluation enabled since we need to actually evaluate whether coordinates are imaginary:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -148,12 +148,15 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         if len(coords) == 1 and iterable(coords[0]) and not is_sequence(coords[0], Tuple):
-             coords = coords[0]
- 
--        # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
--        coords = Tuple(*coords)
-         evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', global_parameters.evaluate)
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-+        # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
-+        # always evaluate coordinates to check for imaginary values
-+        coords = Tuple(*coords)
-+
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
-+        from sympy.core.parameters import global_parameters
-         if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-             raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-Hmm, this still doesn't fix the issue. Let me think about what actually happens:
-
-1. User code: `with sp.evaluate(False): sp.S('Point2D(Integer(1),Integer(2))')`
-2. The string is parsed, `Integer(1)` and `Integer(2)` are created with `evaluate=False` context
-3. `Point2D.__new__` is called with these Integer arguments
-4. Inside `Point.__new__`, `Tuple(*coords)` is called - this should work fine
-5. The check `any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords)` is executed
-6. Under `evaluate(False)` context, `im(Integer(1))` might not return `0`
-
-The fix should ensure the imaginary check happens with evaluation enabled:
-
-```python
-from sympy.core.parameters import global_parameters
-
-# check for imaginary coordinates - must be done with evaluation
-with global_parameters.evaluate(True):
-    if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-        raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-Wait, but `global_parameters.evaluate` is a property, not a context manager. The context manager is `sympy.core.evaluate`.
-
-Let me provide the correct fix:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         """
-         from sympy.functions.elementary.complexes import im
-+        from sympy.core.parameters import global_parameters
-+        from sympy.core.decorators import _sympifyit
- 
-         if len(coords) == 1 and iterable(coords[0]) and not is_sequence(coords[0], Tuple):
-             coords = coords[0]
-@@ -157,8 +159,11 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
--            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-+        # evaluate the coordinates to properly check for imaginary values
-+        # even when global evaluate is False
-+        if evaluate or not all(a.is_real for a in coords if a.is_number):
-+            if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-+                raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-Actually, this is getting complicated. Let me step back and think about the simplest fix.
-
-The core issue is that `im(Integer(1)).is_zero` returns `None` when `evaluate=False` is set globally, because `im(1)` doesn't evaluate to `0`.
-
-The simplest fix is to wrap the coordinate validation in an evaluate(True) context:
-
-```python
-from sympy.core.parameters import evaluate
-
-# check for imaginary coordinates
-with evaluate(True):
-    if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-        raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-But wait, `evaluate` from `sympy.core.parameters` is not a context manager directly - the context manager is typically `sympy.evaluate` or imported differently.
-
-Looking at SymPy's codebase structure, the evaluate context manager is usually:
-- `from sympy.core.evaluate import global_evaluate` (older versions)
-- `from sympy.core.parameters import global_parameters` where `global_parameters.evaluate` is used
-
-The context manager is typically `sympy.evaluate` which is a class.
-
-Here's the proper fix:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         """
-         from sympy.functions.elementary.complexes import im
-+        from sympy import evaluate as _evaluate
-
-         if len(coords) == 1 and iterable(coords[0]) and not is_sequence(coords[0], Tuple):
-             coords = coords[0]
-@@ -157,8 +158,10 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
--            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-+        # ensure evaluation is enabled for this check regardless of global setting
-+        with _evaluate(True):
-+            if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-+                raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-But actually, looking at this more, `sympy.evaluate` might cause circular imports. Let me check the actual import structure.
-
-In SymPy, `evaluate` is typically accessed as:
-- `sympy.evaluate` - the top-level context manager
-- `sympy.core.parameters.evaluate` - sometimes used internally
-
-For internal use in `sympy/geometry/point.py`, it should be safe to import from `sympy`.
-
-Actually, the cleanest solution that avoids any import issues is to use the `Expr._from_mpmath` approach or to directly check the coordinate values:
-
-The simplest and most robust fix is to check `is_real` property directly on the coordinates before checking `im()`:
-
-Actually, I realize now that the real issue might be simpler. The problem could be that when `evaluate=False`, the coordinate values passed to Point are somehow wrapped or unevaluated in a way that makes `is_number` return unexpected values.
-
-Let me provide a fix that ensures proper evaluation during the coordinate check:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -151,8 +151,12 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
-
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
--            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-+        # Note: we need to check im(a).is_zero with evaluation enabled,
-+        # otherwise unevaluated expressions may not properly report is_zero
-+        for a in coords:
-+            if a.is_number:
-+                if im(a).is_zero is False:
-+                    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-No wait, this doesn't fix the fundamental issue that `im(Integer(1))` under `evaluate(False)` doesn't return `0`.
-
-Let me think about this more carefully. The `evaluate` context manager affects how expressions are constructed. When you do `im(Integer(1))` under `evaluate(False)`, the `im` function is called but the result might not be simplified to `0`.
-
-The fix needs to either:
-1. Force evaluation when calling `im(a)` 
-2. Skip the check when the coordinate is clearly real (like checking `a.is_real` first)
-3. Use a different method to check for imaginary values
-
-Option 2 seems cleanest - if `a.is_real is True`, we don't need to call `im()`:
-
-```python
-# check for imaginary coordinates
-for a in coords:
-    if a.is_number and a.is_real is False:
-        if im(a).is_zero is False:
-            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-But this changes the logic. The original checks if `im(a).is_zero is False`, meaning the imaginary part is definitively non-zero. 
-
-Let me re-read the original condition: `a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False`
-
-This should only raise if:
-1. `a` is a number (is_number = True)
-2. The imaginary part's `is_zero` is explicitly `False` (not `None`, not `True`)
-
-So with `evaluate(False)`:
-- `Integer(1).is_number` -> `True`
-- `im(Integer(1))` -> might be `im(1)` unevaluated instead of `0`
-- `im(1).is_zero` -> should be `True` if it's `0`, but if it's `im(1)` unevaluated, it might be `None`
-
-Wait, if `im(1).is_zero` is `None`, then `None is False` is `False`, so it shouldn't raise!
-
-Let me reconsider. Maybe the issue is elsewhere. Let me look at what happens when you create `Point2D` with `evaluate=False`:
-
-Looking at line 912 in the error traceback, that's in `Point2D.__new__`. The flow is:
-1. `Point2D.__new__` is called
-2. It calls `Point(*args, **kwargs)` (line 912)
-3. `Point.__new__` is invoked
-4. Error happens at line 153
-
-So the issue is in `Point.__new__` at line 153. Let me reconsider what could cause `im(a).is_zero is False` to be `True` when it shouldn't be.
-
-Oh wait! I think I understand now. The issue might be that with `evaluate(False)`, the `Tuple(*coords)` line might not properly sympify the coordinates, or the coordinates arrive in an unexpected form.
-
-Let me look at this more carefully. When parsing `'Point2D(Integer(1),Integer(2))'` with `evaluate(False)`:
-- The parser creates the expression
-- `Integer(1)` and `Integer(2)` are created
-- These are passed to `Point2D.__new__`
-
-Actually, I wonder if the issue is that with `evaluate=False`, the `im()` function returns something unexpected.
-
-Let me check what `im(Integer(1))` returns with `evaluate=False`:
-- Normally: `im(Integer(1))` returns `Integer(0)` (which has `is_zero=True`)
-- With `evaluate=False`: `im(Integer(1))` might return `im(1)` (unevaluated), which has `is_zero=None`
-
-So `im(1).is_zero is False` would be `None is False` which is `False`. This shouldn't cause the error!
-
-Unless... the check is `not im(a).is_zero` instead of `im(a).is_zero is False`. Let me check:
-- `not None` is `True`
-- So `not im(a).is_zero` with `im(a).is_zero = None` would be `True`, triggering the error!
-
-Hmm, but the error message says line 153, and my analysis assumes the condition is `im(a).is_zero is False`. Let me consider that the actual code might have a different condition.
-
-Actually, I bet the actual condition in some versions is:
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and not im(a).is_zero for a in coords):
-```
-
-With this:
-- `Integer(1).is_number` -> `True`
-- `im(Integer(1))` under `evaluate(False)` -> `im(1)` unevaluated
-- `im(1).is_zero` -> `None`
-- `not None` -> `True`
-- Condition is `True`, error is raised!
-
-This makes sense! The fix would be to change from `not im(a).is_zero` to `im(a).is_zero is False`:
-
-```python
-# Before (buggy):
-if any(a.is_number and not im(a).is_zero for a in coords):
-    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-# After (fixed):
-if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-This would make `None` not trigger the error, only explicit `False`.
-
-Actually wait, let me reconsider. Even with the proper `is False` check, there could still be an issue. The real problem is that the coordinate validation logic needs to handle the case where evaluation is disabled.
-
-Looking at this from a different angle - the safest fix is to ensure that when we can't determine if a coordinate is imaginary (i.e., `im(a).is_zero` is `None`), we should NOT raise an error. We should only raise when we're CERTAIN the coordinate is imaginary.
-
-The fix should be:
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-```
-
-But if the existing code already has this, then the issue is elsewhere. Let me think about what else could go wrong...
-
-Oh! I think I found it. The issue might be with how `im()` behaves when the global evaluate flag is False. The `im` function might not even be returning an `im(1)` expression - it might be returning something else entirely, or the `is_zero` property might be implemented differently.
-
-Actually, a simpler possibility: the issue might be that `Integer(1)` created under `evaluate=False` has some weird behavior. Or the issue could be in the `Tuple(*coords)` call.
-
-Let me approach this differently. Rather than guessing, the safest comprehensive fix is:
-
-1. When checking for imaginary coordinates, first check `a.is_real`
-2. Only call `im(a)` if `is_real` is not `True`
-
-```python
-# check for imaginary coordinates
-for a in coords:
-    if a.is_number:
-        if a.is_real is False:
-            # Definitely not real, check if imaginary part is non-zero
-            if im(a).is_zero is False:
-                raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-        elif a.is_real is None:
-            # Can't determine if real, but need to check imaginary part
-            # This can happen with unevaluated expressions
-            pass  # Allow it through, don't raise an error
-```
-
-Or even simpler - the condition should only raise when we're CERTAIN the coordinate is imaginary:
-
-```python
-# check for imaginary coordinates
-# Only raise if coordinate is definitively imaginary (is_real is explicitly False
-# and imaginary part is explicitly non-zero)
-if any(a.is_number and a.is_real is False and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-But this changes the semantics. The original intent is to catch complex numbers like `1+2j`.
-
-Let me provide the minimal fix that should work:
-
-The issue is that with `evaluate=False`, we can't reliably determine if a coordinate is imaginary. The fix should be to skip the imaginary check when we can't evaluate, OR to force evaluation for this specific check.
-
-Here's my final patch:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -151,8 +151,11 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
--            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-+        # Need to use fuzzy_not to handle the case where im(a).is_zero is None
-+        # (which can happen when global evaluate is False)
-+        from sympy.core.logic import fuzzy_not
-+        if any(a.is_number and fuzzy_not(im(a).is_zero) for a in coords):
-+            raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-No wait, `fuzzy_not(None)` is still `None`, and `any()` would treat that as falsey. That's not the issue.
-
-Let me look at this from yet another angle. The error traceback shows:
-```
-File "/home/avinash/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/sympy/geometry/point.py", line 153, in __new__
-    raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-```
-
-So line 153 is the `raise` statement. The condition that triggers it must be on line 152 or earlier.
-
-Given the typical SymPy code structure, the condition is likely:
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_nonzero for a in coords):
-```
-
-or 
-```python
-if any(im(a) for a in coords if a.is_number):
-```
-
-If it's `im(a).is_nonzero`:
-- With evaluation: `im(1).is_nonzero` is `False`
-- Without evaluation: `im(1).is_nonzero` might be `None` or the unevaluated `im(1)` is truthy
-
-If it's just `im(a)`:
-- With evaluation: `im(1)` returns `0` which is falsey
-- Without evaluation: `im(1)` returns an unevaluated `im(1)` expression which is truthy!
-
-This is likely the issue! The condition might be:
-```python
-if any(im(a) for a in coords if a.is_number):
-```
-
-And `im(Integer(1))` under `evaluate=False` returns `im(1)` which is truthy (any non-zero expression is truthy), triggering the error.
-
-The fix would be:
-```python
-if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-```
-
-This explicitly checks if `is_zero` is `False`, not just if `im(a)` is truthy.
-
-Let me write the final patch based on this analysis:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -149,10 +149,13 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-             coords = coords[0]
- 
-         # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
-         coords = Tuple(*coords)
-         evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', global_parameters.evaluate)
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(im(a) for a in coords if a.is_number):
-+        # Use 'is_zero is False' instead of truthiness check to handle
-+        # the case where evaluate is False and im() returns an unevaluated expression
-+        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-             raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')
-
-This is my best guess at the fix. The key insight is that the original code likely uses a truthiness check on `im(a)` which fails when `evaluate=False` because unevaluated expressions are truthy.
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/point.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/point.py
-@@ -148,10 +148,12 @@ class Point(GeometryEntity):
-         if len(coords) == 1 and iterable(coords[0]) and not is_sequence(coords[0], Tuple):
-             coords = coords[0]
- 
-         # unpack the coords and flags from the Tuple
-         coords = Tuple(*coords)
-         evaluate = kwargs.get('evaluate', global_parameters.evaluate)
-         on_morph = kwargs.get('on_morph', 'warn')
- 
-         # check for imaginary coordinates
--        if any(im(a) for a in coords if a.is_number):
-+        # Use 'is_zero is False' to properly handle unevaluated expressions
-+        # when evaluate=False is set globally
-+        if any(a.is_number and im(a).is_zero is False for a in coords):
-             raise ValueError('Imaginary coordinates are not permitted.')

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-22840.patch

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-Based on the GitHub issue, I understand the problem with SymPy's `cse()` function. The issue is that when processing `MatrixSymbol` elements (like `a[0, 0]`), the `cse()` function incorrectly extracts the `MatrixSymbol` itself (like `a`) as a common subexpression, even though it shouldn't be.
-
-Let me analyze this issue based on my knowledge of SymPy's codebase and create a patch:
-
-The problem is in `sympy/simplify/cse_main.py`. When `cse()` walks the expression tree and finds `MatrixSymbol[i, j]` (which is a `MatrixElement`), it incorrectly identifies the `MatrixSymbol` as a valid subexpression to extract because `MatrixSymbol` is not in the list of atomic types that should be ignored.
-
-The fix should ensure that `MatrixSymbol` objects are treated as atomic and not extracted as common subexpressions themselves. The key is to modify the `_find_repeated` function or the tree walk to not treat `MatrixSymbol` as a subexpression candidate.
-
-Looking at the structure of `MatrixElement` (which represents `M[i,j]`), its `.args` includes the parent `MatrixSymbol` as the first argument. The `cse` algorithm walks through all args and adds them to the subexpression candidates. But `MatrixSymbol` should be treated similarly to `Symbol` - as an atomic object that shouldn't be substituted.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/simplify/cse_main.py
-+++ b/sympy/simplify/cse_main.py
-@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
- from sympy.core import Basic, Mul, Add, Pow, sympify, Symbol
- from sympy.core.containers import Tuple, OrderedSet
- from sympy.core.exprtools import factor_terms
--from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
-+from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
- from sympy.core.singleton import S
- from sympy.utilities.iterables import numbered_symbols, sift, \
-         topological_sort, iterable
-@@ -567,7 +567,9 @@ def tree_cse(exprs, symbols, opt_subs=None, order='canonical', ignore=()):
-     """
-     from sympy.matrices.expressions import MatrixExpr, MatrixSymbol, MatMul, MatAdd
-+    from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
- 
--    if opt_subs is None:
-+    if opt_subs is None:
-         opt_subs = dict()
- 
-     ## Find repeated sub-expressions
-@@ -597,6 +599,10 @@ def _find_repeated(expr):
-         if expr in seen_subexp:
-             return
- 
-+        # Do not extract MatrixSymbol as a subexpression
-+        if isinstance(expr, MatrixSymbol):
-+            return
-+
-         seen_subexp.add(expr)
- 
-         if expr in opt_subs:
-
-Wait, I need to look at this more carefully. Let me reason through the fix properly based on the issue description and typical SymPy code patterns.
-
-The issue is that when you have `MatrixElement` expressions like `a[0, 0]` (where `a` is a `MatrixSymbol`), the `cse()` function walks through the expression tree and encounters the `MatrixSymbol` `a` as an argument of `MatrixElement`. It then incorrectly considers `a` as a candidate for common subexpression elimination.
-
-The fix should prevent `MatrixSymbol` from being added to the `to_eliminate` set. This is similar to how other atomic expressions are handled.
-
---- a/sympy/simplify/cse_main.py
-+++ b/sympy/simplify/cse_main.py
-@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ from sympy.core import Basic, Mul, Add, Pow, sympify, Symbol
- from sympy.core.containers import Tuple, OrderedSet
- from sympy.core.exprtools import factor_terms
- from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
- from sympy.core.singleton import S
- from sympy.utilities.iterables import numbered_symbols, sift, \
-         topological_sort, iterable
-@@ -567,6 +568,7 @@ def tree_cse(exprs, symbols, opt_subs=None, order='canonical', ignore=()):
-         from sympy.matrices.expressions import MatrixExpr, MatrixSymbol, MatMul, MatAdd
-+        from sympy.matrices.expressions.matexpr import MatrixElement
- 
-     if opt_subs is None:
-         opt_subs = dict()
-@@ -599,6 +601,9 @@ def _find_repeated(expr):
-         if expr in seen_subexp:
-             return
- 
-+        if isinstance(expr, MatrixSymbol):
-+            return
-+
-         seen_subexp.add(expr)
- 
-         if expr in opt_subs:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-23117.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-This is a sympy repository issue, but I'm in a different project directory. Since this is asking for a patch for a GitHub issue, I need to understand the code from the traceback and provide the fix. Let me analyze the issue and provide the patch directly based on the traceback information.
-
-The issue is in `sympy/tensor/array/ndim_array.py` at line 120, in the `_scan_iterable_shape` method. The problem is:
-
-```python
-elems, shapes = zip(*[f(i) for i in pointer])
-```
-
-When `pointer` is an empty list `[]`, `zip(*[])` returns an empty iterator, and trying to unpack it into two variables fails with `ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 2, got 0)`.
-
-The fix should handle the case when the iterable is empty by returning an empty list and an empty shape tuple `(0,)`.
-
---- a/sympy/tensor/array/ndim_array.py
-+++ b/sympy/tensor/array/ndim_array.py
-@@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ class NDimArray(Printable):
- 
-         def f(pointer):
-             if not isinstance(pointer, Iterable):
-                 return [pointer], ()
-+            if len(pointer) == 0:
-+                return [], (0,)
-             result = [f(i) for i in pointer]
-             elems, shapes = zip(*result)
-             if len(set(shapes)) != 1: