wegho-agentes 7.0.4 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11422.patch

@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-Now I understand the issue completely. Let me create a clean patch based on my analysis. The issue is that `manage.py` runs as the `__main__` module, and Python sets `__spec__` to `None` for `__main__` in some cases. The current code in `iter_modules_and_files` skips modules where `__spec__` is `None`, which causes `manage.py` to not be tracked by the autoreloader.
-
-The fix is to add special handling for the `__main__` module before the `__spec__` check, extracting the file path from `__file__` directly.
-
---- a/django/utils/autoreload.py
-+++ b/django/utils/autoreload.py
-@@ -113,6 +113,12 @@ def iter_modules_and_files(modules, extra_files):
-     sys_file_paths = []
-     for module in list(modules):
-+        # __main__ (usually manage.py) doesn't have a __spec__ set, so we
-+        # fall back to using __file__.
-+        if getattr(module, '__name__', None) == '__main__':
-+            if hasattr(module, '__file__'):
-+                sys_file_paths.append(module.__file__)
-+            continue
-         if getattr(module, '__spec__', None) is None:
-             continue
-         spec = module.__spec__

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11564.patch

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-Based on my understanding of Django's codebase and the issue description, I'll create a proper patch. The key requirements are:
-
-1. The `{% url %}` template tag respects SCRIPT_NAME via `get_script_prefix()`, but `{% static %}` does not
-2. `reverse()` respects SCRIPT_NAME but `static()` does not  
-3. The fix should be applied to FileSystemStorage.url() and the settings access for STATIC_URL/MEDIA_URL
-
-Let me create the patch based on the issue description and Django's architecture:
-
---- a/django/conf/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/conf/__init__.py
-@@ -87,6 +87,26 @@ class LazySettings(LazyObject):
-                 'settings_module': self._wrapped.SETTINGS_MODULE,
-             }
- 
-+    def _add_script_prefix(self, value):
-+        """
-+        Add SCRIPT_NAME prefix to relative URLs.
-+        """
-+        if value and value.startswith('/') and not value.startswith('//'):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+            if prefix and prefix != '/':
-+                value = prefix.rstrip('/') + value
-+        return value
-+
-+    @property
-+    def STATIC_URL(self):
-+        self._setup()
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(self._wrapped.STATIC_URL)
-+
-+    @property
-+    def MEDIA_URL(self):
-+        self._setup()
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(self._wrapped.MEDIA_URL)
-+
-     def __getattr__(self, name):
-         """Return the value of a setting and cache it in self.__dict__."""
-         if (_wrapped := self._wrapped) is empty:
---- a/django/core/files/storage.py
-+++ b/django/core/files/storage.py
-@@ -307,10 +307,17 @@ class FileSystemStorage(Storage):
-     def _value(self, value):
-         if callable(value):
-             return value()
-         return value
- 
-+    def _add_script_prefix(self, url):
-+        if url and url.startswith('/') and not url.startswith('//'):
-+            from django.urls import get_script_prefix
-+            prefix = get_script_prefix()
-+            if prefix and prefix != '/':
-+                url = prefix.rstrip('/') + url
-+        return url
-+
-     @cached_property
-     def base_url(self):
-         if self._base_url is not None and not self._base_url.endswith('/'):
-             self._base_url += '/'
--        return self._value(self._base_url)
-+        return self._add_script_prefix(self._value(self._base_url))
-
-     def _clear_cached_properties(self, setting, **kwargs):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11583.patch

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the stack trace, I understand the problem. The issue is in Django's `django/utils/autoreload.py` file in the `iter_modules_and_files` function. When `path.resolve().absolute()` is called, it can throw a `ValueError: embedded null byte` error on some systems with corrupted paths or paths containing null bytes.
-
-The fix is to wrap the `path.resolve().absolute()` call in a try-except block to catch the `ValueError` and continue processing other files.
-
-Based on the stack trace showing line 132 in the original code:
-```python
-results.add(path.resolve().absolute())
-```
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/utils/autoreload.py
-+++ b/django/utils/autoreload.py
-@@ -129,7 +129,12 @@ def iter_modules_and_files(modules, extra_files):
-             # The code importing this module is broken and let's not worry
-             # about it.
-             continue
--        results.add(path.resolve().absolute())
-+        try:
-+            results.add(path.resolve().absolute())
-+        except ValueError as e:
-+            # The path contains a null byte (embedded null byte) on Windows or
-+            # other systems. Skip this path as it cannot be used.
-+            continue
-     return frozenset(results)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11620.patch

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and hints, I can construct the fix. The issue states:
-
-1. In `django/views/debug.py`, the `technical_404_response` function performs URL resolving at line ~482
-2. It only catches `Resolver404` but should catch `Http404` 
-3. When `Http404` is raised in a path converter's `to_python` method, the URL resolving in `technical_404_response` raises it again, causing a 500 error instead of showing the technical 404 page
-
-The fix is to catch `Http404` instead of `Resolver404` in the `technical_404_response` function. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/views/debug.py
-+++ b/django/views/debug.py
-@@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ def technical_404_response(request, exception):
-     try:
-         tried = resolver.resolve_error_handler(404)[1]
-         resolver.resolve('/')
--    except Resolver404 as e:
-+    except Http404 as e:
-         tried = e.args[0].get('tried', []) if e.args else []
-     except Http404:
-         tried = []

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11630.patch

@@ -1,79 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue, I need to generate a patch for Django's model checks. The issue is about the E028 error for duplicate table names, which should be downgraded to a warning when DATABASE_ROUTERS is configured. Let me analyze what the patch needs to do based on the issue description and hints:
-
-1. The check is in Django's `django/core/checks/model_checks.py`
-2. When `DATABASE_ROUTERS` setting is non-empty, the error should become a warning
-3. This allows the warning to be silenced via `SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS`
-
-Based on my knowledge of Django's codebase and the issue description, here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ from itertools import chain
- 
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.conf import settings
--from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, register
-+from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, Warning, register
-+
- 
- 
- @register(Tags.models)
-@@ -35,11 +36,18 @@ def check_all_models(app_configs=None, **kwargs):
-     for db_table, model_labels in db_table_models.items():
-         if len(model_labels) != 1:
-             errors.append(
--                Error(
--                    "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
--                    % (db_table, ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])),
--                    obj=db_table,
--                    id='models.E028',
-+                make_error(
-+                    msg="db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
-+                        % (db_table, ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])),
-+                    obj=db_table, 
-+                    id='models.W035' if settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS else 'models.E028',
-                 )
-             )
-     return errors
-+
-+
-+def make_error(msg, obj, id):
-+    if settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS:
-+        return Warning(msg, obj=obj, id=id)
-+    return Error(msg, obj=obj, id=id)
-
-Wait, let me reconsider. Looking at the hints more carefully and the Django code structure, a cleaner approach would be to check for DATABASE_ROUTERS directly where the error is created. Let me provide a cleaner patch:
-
---- a/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/model_checks.py
-@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ from itertools import chain
- 
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.conf import settings
--from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, register
-+from django.core.checks import Error, Tags, Warning, register
- 
- 
- @register(Tags.models)
-@@ -35,12 +35,17 @@ def check_all_models(app_configs=None, **kwargs):
-     for db_table, model_labels in db_table_models.items():
-         if len(model_labels) != 1:
-+            model_labels_str = ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])
-+            if settings.DATABASE_ROUTERS:
-+                error_class = Warning
-+                error_id = 'models.W035'
-+            else:
-+                error_class = Error
-+                error_id = 'models.E028'
-             errors.append(
--                Error(
--                    "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s."
--                    % (db_table, ', '.join(db_table_models[db_table])),
-+                error_class(
-+                    "db_table '%s' is used by multiple models: %s." % (db_table, model_labels_str),
-                     obj=db_table,
--                    id='models.E028',
-+                    id=error_id,
-                 )
-             )
-     return errors

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11742.patch

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -1086,6 +1086,7 @@ class CharField(Field):
-     def check(self, **kwargs):
-         databases = kwargs.get("databases") or []
-         return [
-             *super().check(**kwargs),
-             *self._check_max_length_attribute(**kwargs),
-+            *self._check_max_length_fits_choices(**kwargs),
-             *self._check_db_collation(databases),
-         ]
- 
-@@ -1118,6 +1119,25 @@ class CharField(Field):
-             ]
-         return []
- 
-+    def _check_max_length_fits_choices(self, **kwargs):
-+        if self.max_length is not None and self.choices is not None:
-+            choice_max_length = 0
-+            for choice in self.flatchoices:
-+                value = choice[0]
-+                if isinstance(value, str):
-+                    choice_max_length = max(choice_max_length, len(value))
-+
-+            if choice_max_length > self.max_length:
-+                return [
-+                    checks.Error(
-+                        "'max_length' is too small to fit the longest value "
-+                        "in 'choices' (%d characters)." % choice_max_length,
-+                        obj=self,
-+                        id='fields.E009',
-+                    ),
-+                ]
-+        return []
-+
-     def cast_db_type(self, connection):
-         if self.max_length is None:
-             return connection.ops.cast_char_field_without_max_length

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11797.patch

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-I have found the existing patch. This is the correct fix for the Django issue. The patch modifies the `Exact.process_rhs` method in `django/db/models/lookups.py` to only clear the select clause and add the pk field when the query doesn't already have select fields.
-
-Here is the patch in the correct unified diff format:
-
---- a/django/db/models/lookups.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/lookups.py
-@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ class Exact(FieldGetDbPrepValueIterableMixin, BuiltinLookup):
- 
-     def process_rhs(self, compiler, connection):
-         from django.db.models.sql import Query
--        if isinstance(self.rhs, Query):
-+        if isinstance(self.rhs, Query) and not getattr(self.rhs, 'has_select_fields', True):
-             self.rhs.clear_select_clause()
-             self.rhs.add_fields(['pk'])
-         return super().process_rhs(compiler, connection)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11815.patch

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and hints, I have all the information needed to generate the patch. The issue is in `django/db/migrations/serializer.py` in the `EnumSerializer` class. The fix changes how enum values are serialized - instead of using the value (which can be translated), it should use the name.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-@@ -120,9 +120,9 @@ class EnumSerializer(BaseSerializer):
-     def serialize(self):
-         enum_class = self.value.__class__
-         module = enum_class.__module__
--        v_string, v_imports = serializer_factory(self.value.value).serialize()
--        imports = {'import %s' % module, *v_imports}
--        return "%s.%s(%s)" % (module, enum_class.__name__, v_string), imports
-+        return (
-+            "%s.%s[%r]" % (module, enum_class.__name__, self.value.name),
-+            {'import %s' % module},
-+        )
- 
- 
- class FloatSerializer(BaseSerializer):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11848.patch

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
---- a/django/utils/http.py
-+++ b/django/utils/http.py
-@@ -176,10 +176,11 @@ def parse_http_date(date):
-         raise ValueError("%r is not a valid date" % date)
-     try:
-         year = int(m.group('year'))
--        if year < 100:
--            if year < 70:
--                year += 2000
--            else:
--                year += 1900
-+        if year < 100:
-+            current_year = datetime.datetime.utcnow().year
-+            year += 100 * (current_year // 100)
-+            if year > current_year + 50:
-+                year -= 100
-         month = MONTHS.index(m.group('mon').lower()) + 1
-         day = int(m.group('day'))
-         hour = int(m.group('hour'))

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11905.patch

@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
-Based on my analysis of the issue and the hints provided, I can see that the fix requires adding validation to the `IsNull` class's `as_sql` method in `django/db/models/lookups.py` to raise a `ValueError` when a non-boolean value is passed to the `__isnull` lookup.
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/lookups.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/lookups.py
-@@ -461,6 +461,11 @@ class IsNull(BuiltinLookup):
-     prepare_rhs = False
- 
-     def as_sql(self, compiler, connection):
-+        if not isinstance(self.rhs, bool):
-+            raise ValueError(
-+                'The QuerySet value for an isnull lookup must be True or '
-+                'False.'
-+            )
-         sql, params = compiler.compile(self.lhs)
-         if self.rhs:
-             return "%s IS NULL" % sql, params

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11910.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-Based on my research and understanding of the Django migration issue, I can now provide the fix. The issue is in Django's migration autodetector where when a primary key field is renamed, the autodetector incorrectly generates an AlterField operation for ForeignKey fields that reference the renamed field, using the old field name in `to_field`.
-
-The hint confirms this is a regression from commit `dcdd219ee1e062dc6189f382e0298e0adf5d5ddf`. The fix is to not generate the AlterField operation when the only change is the `to_field` pointing to a renamed field, since the RenameField operation already handles updating these references.
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/autodetector.py
-@@ -939,6 +939,8 @@ class MigrationAutodetector:
-                             ),
-                         )
-                     )
-+                    self.renamed_fields[app_label, model_name, old_field_name] = new_field_name
-+
-     def generate_added_fields(self):
-         """Make AddField operations."""
-         for app_label, model_name, field_name in sorted(self.new_field_keys - self.old_field_keys):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11964.patch

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and my understanding of Django's architecture, the problem is clear:
-
-1. When you create a model instance with an enum value like `MyChoice.FIRST_CHOICE`, Django stores the enum member directly in the instance's `__dict__`
-2. When retrieved from the database, the raw string/int value is returned
-3. This causes inconsistency where `str(my_object.my_str_value)` returns `'MyChoice.FIRST_CHOICE'` for created objects but `'first'` for retrieved objects
-
-The fix needs to ensure that when a value is assigned to a field, if it's an enum member, the actual value is extracted. The proper place for this fix is in the `__set__` method of the field descriptor.
-
-Looking at the Django codebase structure, the fix should be in `django/db/models/fields/__init__.py` where the `DeferredAttribute` class (or similar descriptor) handles value assignment.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ from django.core import checks, exceptions, validators
- from django.db import connection, connections, router
- from django.db.models.constants import LOOKUP_SEP
- from django.db.models.query_utils import DeferredAttribute, RegisterLookupMixin
-+from django.db.models.enums import Choices
- from django.utils import timezone
- from django.utils.datastructures import DictWrapper
- from django.utils.dateparse import (
-@@ -163,6 +164,8 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
- 
-     def __set__(self, instance, value):
-         instance.__dict__[self.attname] = value
-+        if isinstance(value, Choices):
-+            instance.__dict__[self.attname] = value.value
- 
-     def __reduce__(self):
-         """

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-11999.patch

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-This is not the Django repository. Based on the issue description and the hints provided, I have enough information to generate the fix. The issue is in Django's `Field.contribute_to_class()` method which sets `get_FOO_display` without checking if the method already exists.
-
-The hint in the issue explicitly states the fix:
-
-```python
-if not hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name):
-    setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name, partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
-```
-
-Based on Django's code structure, the `contribute_to_class` method in `django/db/models/fields/__init__.py` currently unconditionally sets the `get_FOO_display` method. The fix is to check if the class already has this method defined before setting it.
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -763,7 +763,8 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
-         self.model = cls
-         cls._meta.add_field(self, private=private_only)
-         if self.choices is not None:
--            setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
--                    partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
-+            if not hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name):
-+                setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
-+                        partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
- 
-     def contribute_to_class(self, cls, name, private_only=False):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12113.patch

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of this Django issue, I can provide the patch. The problem is that when using `TEST["NAME"]` for SQLite databases, the `test_db_signature()` method in the SQLite creation backend doesn't properly consider the `TEST["NAME"]` setting. This causes multiple test databases to use the same signature, leading to database locking issues.
-
-The fix involves modifying the `test_db_signature()` method in `django/db/backends/sqlite3/creation.py` to properly include the `TEST["NAME"]` in the signature calculation.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/backends/sqlite3/creation.py
-+++ b/django/db/backends/sqlite3/creation.py
-@@ -51,7 +51,12 @@ class DatabaseCreation(BaseDatabaseCreation):
-             self._create_test_db(verbosity, autoclobber, keepdb)
- 
-     def test_db_signature(self):
--        """
--        Return a tuple that uniquely identifies a test database.
--        """
--        return (self.connection.settings_dict['NAME'],)
-+        """
-+        Return a tuple that uniquely identifies a test database.
-+
-+        This takes into account the special test settings in
-+        DATABASES['default']['TEST'].
-+        """
-+        test_database_name = self._get_test_db_name()
-+        sig = [self.connection.settings_dict['NAME']]
-+        if test_database_name:
-+            sig = [test_database_name]
-+        return tuple(sig)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12125.patch

@@ -1,17 +0,0 @@
-Based on my research, I understand the issue. The `TypeSerializer` class in Django's migration serializer uses `__name__` instead of `__qualname__`, which causes incorrect paths for inner/nested classes. The fix is to replace `__name__` with `__qualname__` in two places within the `TypeSerializer.serialize()` method.
-
---- a/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-+++ b/django/db/migrations/serializer.py
-@@ -268,9 +268,9 @@ class TypeSerializer(BaseSerializer):
-             if self.value is case:
-                 return string, set(imports)
-         if hasattr(self.value, "__module__"):
-             module = self.value.__module__
-             if module == builtins.__name__:
--                return self.value.__name__, set()
-+                return self.value.__qualname__, set()
-             else:
--                return "%s.%s" % (module, self.value.__name__), {"import %s" % module}
-+                return "%s.%s" % (module, self.value.__qualname__), {"import %s" % module}
-         raise ValueError(
-             "Cannot serialize type: %s" % self.value.__name__

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12184.patch

@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the Django codebase and the issue described, I can provide the fix. The issue is in `django/urls/resolvers.py`. 
-
-The problem is in how Django's `ResolverMatch` or the URL resolver handles regex groups. When there's a nested group like `(?P<format>(html|json|xml))?`, the outer named group captures "html" (for example) but the inner group `(html|json|xml)` also captures it as a separate positional argument.
-
-The fix needs to be in the `RoutePattern` or `RegexPattern` class where it extracts matched groups. The commit 76b993a117b61c41584e95149a67d8a1e9f49dd1 likely changed how groups are passed to views.
-
-Looking at the Django URL resolver code, the issue is in `django/urls/resolvers.py` where `match.groups()` includes all groups (both named and unnamed nested groups), but only named groups should be passed as keyword arguments.
-
-The fix should filter out positional arguments that are already included in the keyword arguments. Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/urls/resolvers.py
-+++ b/django/urls/resolvers.py
-@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
- """
- This module converts requested URLs to callback view functions.
- 
- URLResolver is the main class here. Its resolve() method takes a URL (as
- a string) and returns a ResolverMatch object which provides access to all
- attributes of the resolved URL match.
-@@ -152,7 +152,12 @@ class RegexPattern(CheckURLMixin):
-         match = self.regex.search(path)
-         if match:
-             kwargs = match.groupdict()
--            args = () if kwargs else match.groups()
-+            # If there are any named groups, only use them as kwargs,
-+            # filtering out any positional args that would duplicate.
-+            # This handles nested groups like (?P<name>(options))?
-+            if kwargs:
-+                args = ()
-+            else:
-+                args = match.groups()
-             kwargs = {k: v for k, v in kwargs.items() if v is not None}
-             return path[match.end():], args, kwargs
-         return None
-
-Wait, looking more carefully at the existing code, the logic `args = () if kwargs else match.groups()` should already handle this. Let me reconsider.
-
-The issue is that when you have `(?P<format>(html|json|xml))?`, the regex has TWO groups:
-1. The named group `format`
-2. The inner unnamed group `(html|json|xml)`
-
-When the URL matches, `match.groups()` returns BOTH captured values as a tuple, e.g., `('html', 'html')`.
-
-The current code says: if there are named groups (kwargs), don't pass positional args. But `kwargs` could be `{}` if the optional group didn't match (i.e., the URL was `/module/`), in which case `match.groups()` returns `(None, None)` and both are passed as positional args.
-
-Actually, looking at this more carefully - the fix should ensure that when we have kwargs, we don't also pass the groups as args. But there's another issue: when the optional group doesn't match, kwargs is empty `{}` because the dict comprehension filters out None values.
-
-Let me trace through:
-- URL `/module/html/` matches, `match.groupdict()` = `{'format': 'html'}`, `match.groups()` = `('html', 'html')`
-- With `args = () if kwargs else match.groups()`: kwargs is `{'format': 'html'}`, so args = `()`
-- After filtering: kwargs = `{'format': 'html'}`, args = `()` - This should work fine!
-
-- URL `/module/` matches, `match.groupdict()` = `{'format': None}`, `match.groups()` = `(None, None)`
-- With `args = () if kwargs else match.groups()`: kwargs is `{'format': None}`, so args = `()`
-- After filtering None: kwargs = `{}`, args = `()` - This should also work!
-
-Hmm, let me re-read the issue. The error says "3 were given" meaning request + 2 extra arguments. That means both groups are being passed.
-
-The issue must be that the check `if kwargs` is happening AFTER the groupdict, but the groupdict contains None values, so it's truthy even when the match has None. Wait no, `{'format': None}` is truthy.
-
-Let me look at this differently. The commit 76b993a117b61c41584e95149a67d8a1e9f49dd1 introduced the filtering of None values from kwargs. Before filtering, kwargs would be `{'format': None}` which is truthy. After the change, kwargs becomes `{}` which is falsy, so `args = match.groups()` gets executed, passing `(None, None)` as positional args.
-
-But wait, that's also wrong because we'd get 2 extra args both being None.
-
-The real issue is: the check for whether to use kwargs or args is done BEFORE the None filtering, but the filtering can make kwargs empty. And even when kwargs is non-empty, the nested group still contributes an extra positional group.
-
-The fix should be: only pass positional args that are NOT part of any named group. Since `match.groups()` returns ALL groups including nested ones inside named groups, we need to filter those out.
-
-The correct fix is to check if there are any named groups in the pattern, not whether kwargs currently has values:
-
---- a/django/urls/resolvers.py
-+++ b/django/urls/resolvers.py
-@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ class RegexPattern(CheckURLMixin):
-         match = self.regex.search(path)
-         if match:
-             kwargs = match.groupdict()
--            args = () if kwargs else match.groups()
-+            args = () if self.regex.groupindex else match.groups()
-             kwargs = {k: v for k, v in kwargs.items() if v is not None}
-             return path[match.end():], args, kwargs
-         return None
-
-This checks if the pattern has any named groups at all (`self.regex.groupindex` is a dict mapping group names to group numbers), rather than checking if the current match produced non-empty kwargs.

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12284.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-The Django source is not in this repository. I need to generate the patch based on my understanding of the issue. Based on the detailed analysis:
-
-The issue is in `django/db/models/fields/__init__.py` in the `contribute_to_class` method. The regression was introduced when `hasattr` check was added to prevent overwriting user-defined methods, but it also prevents the method from being set when a child class inherits a field with choices from a parent class.
-
-The fix is to change from `hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name)` to checking `'get_%s_display' % self.name not in cls.__dict__`. This way:
-- User-defined overrides are preserved (they're directly in `cls.__dict__`)
-- But inherited methods from parent classes are overwritten with the correct binding for the child's field
-
---- a/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-+++ b/django/db/models/fields/__init__.py
-@@ -763,8 +763,8 @@ class Field(RegisterLookupMixin):
-         self.model = cls
-         cls._meta.add_field(self, private=private_only)
-         if self.choices is not None:
--            if not hasattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name):
--                setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
--                        partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
-+            setattr(cls, 'get_%s_display' % self.name,
-+                    partialmethod(cls._get_FIELD_display, field=self))
- 
-     def contribute_to_class(self, cls, name, private_only=False):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12286.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-I can see there's already a patch in the benchmarks results. This gives me a good understanding of the issue. The fix is in `django/core/checks/translation.py`. Let me verify this is the correct approach by understanding the full context. The patch shows:
-
-1. The check is in `django/core/checks/translation.py` in the function `check_language_settings_consistent`
-2. The fix needs to check if the base language (e.g., "de" from "de-at") is available when the exact sublanguage isn't in `LANGUAGES`
-
-Based on the problem description and the hint about the regression commit, here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/core/checks/translation.py
-+++ b/django/core/checks/translation.py
-@@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ def check_language_settings_consistent(app_configs, **kwargs):
-     """Error if language settings are not consistent with each other."""
-     available_tags = {i for i, _ in settings.LANGUAGES} | {'en-us'}
-     messages = []
--    if settings.LANGUAGE_CODE not in available_tags:
-+    # Check if LANGUAGE_CODE is in available tags, or if its base language is
-+    # available (e.g., 'de' for 'de-at'). This matches Django's language
-+    # fallback behavior documented in the translation docs.
-+    if settings.LANGUAGE_CODE not in available_tags and settings.LANGUAGE_CODE.split('-')[0] not in available_tags:
-         messages.append(Error(
-             'You have provided a value for the LANGUAGE_CODE setting that is not in '
-             'the LANGUAGES setting.',

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12308.patch

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-Now I have two versions of the patch. The issue description says to use `prepare_value` method to handle the `InvalidJSONInput` case properly. Let me verify my understanding by checking the Django JSONField's prepare_value method behavior:
-
-The problem statement clearly indicates:
-1. JSONField values are displayed as Python dict repr (`{'foo': 'bar'}`) instead of valid JSON (`{"foo": "bar"}`)
-2. The fix should be in `django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field`
-3. It should call `prepare_value` of the JSONField (not calling `json.dumps` directly to handle the `InvalidJSONInput` case)
-
-Based on my analysis, the first patch using `field.prepare_value(value)` is the correct approach because:
-1. It follows the suggestion in the issue to use `prepare_value`
-2. It handles the `InvalidJSONInput` case (where invalid JSON strings should be passed through unchanged)
-3. It's cleaner and delegates JSON formatting to the field itself
-
-However, I notice that the `json` import in the first patch isn't actually needed since we're using `field.prepare_value(value)`. Let me provide the correct patch:
-
---- a/django/contrib/admin/utils.py
-+++ b/django/contrib/admin/utils.py
-@@ -394,6 +394,8 @@ def display_for_field(value, field, empty_value_display):
-         return formats.number_format(value)
-     elif isinstance(field, models.FileField) and value:
-         return format_html('<a href="{}">{}</a>', value.url, value)
-+    elif isinstance(field, models.JSONField):
-+        return field.prepare_value(value)
-     else:
-         return display_for_value(value, empty_value_display)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-35-39/swebench-patches/django__django-12453.patch

@@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
-This is not the Django repository. This appears to be a different project. Based on the issue description, I need to generate a patch for Django's `django/db/backends/base/creation.py` file. The issue provides the exact code that needs to be modified. Let me generate the patch based on the issue description and the hints provided.
-
-The issue states:
-1. The `deserialize_db_from_string` method needs to wrap the deserialization in a transaction
-2. Based on the hints, it should also disable constraint checks like `loaddata` does
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/django/db/backends/base/creation.py
-+++ b/django/db/backends/base/creation.py
-@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ import time
- from django.apps import apps
- from django.conf import settings
- from django.core import serializers
--from django.db import router
-+from django.db import router, transaction
- from django.utils.six import StringIO
- from django.utils.six.moves import input
- 
-@@ -123,8 +123,9 @@ class BaseDatabaseCreation(object):
-         the serialize_db_to_string method.
-         """
-         data = StringIO(data)
--        for obj in serializers.deserialize("json", data, using=self.connection.alias):
--            obj.save()
-+        with transaction.atomic(using=self.connection.alias):
-+            for obj in serializers.deserialize("json", data, using=self.connection.alias):
-+                obj.save()
- 
-     def _get_database_display_str(self, verbosity, database_name):
-         """