wegho-agentes 7.0.4 → 7.0.6

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-13915.patch

@@ -1,97 +0,0 @@
-Based on my understanding of the SymPy issue and the discussions in the GitHub issue, I can create the fix. The issue is in `sympy/core/mul.py` where the `_gather` helper in the `Mul` class combines powers incorrectly when the base contains infinity.
-
-From the issue discussion:
-1. `(z + zoo)/(z + zoo)` incorrectly returns `1` because powers are combined
-2. The fix should return `nan` when combining an expression containing infinity with its inverse
-3. The key is checking if the base contains `zoo` (ComplexInfinity), `oo`, or `-oo` before combining powers
-
-Based on my knowledge of SymPy's codebase structure and the issue details, here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/core/mul.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/mul.py
-@@ -262,6 +262,14 @@ class Mul(Expr, AssocOp):
- 
-             if b.is_Number:
-                 c, nc = split_args(b)
-+            elif b.is_Add:
-+                # Check if the base contains infinity
-+                for bi in b.args:
-+                    if bi.is_infinite:
-+                        # Don't combine powers when base contains infinity
-+                        # as this leads to incorrect results like (zoo + x)/(zoo + x) -> 1
-+                        c_powers[b] = c_powers.get(b, S.Zero) + e
-+                        continue
-+                c, nc = S.One, []
-             else:
-                 c, nc = S.One, []
- 
-@@ -318,6 +326,16 @@ class Mul(Expr, AssocOp):
-                 c_powers[b] = c_powers.get(b, S.Zero) + e
-                 if e.is_real is not None:
-                     obj = b**e
-+                    # Check if base contains infinity after evaluating
-+                    if obj.is_Mul or obj.is_Pow:
-+                        has_inf = False
-+                        for arg in obj.args if obj.is_Mul else [obj.base]:
-+                            if arg.is_infinite or (arg.is_Add and any(a.is_infinite for a in arg.args)):
-+                                has_inf = True
-+                                break
-+                        if has_inf:
-+                            # Skip combining powers for expressions with infinity
-+                            continue
-                     if obj.is_Number:
-                         if obj is S.NaN:
-                             return [S.NaN], [], None
-
-Wait, I need to look more carefully at the actual SymPy code to make the correct fix. Let me search for the exact file online to understand the structure better.
-
-Based on the issue discussion, specifically this comment: "The problem is that (because of -zoo being same as zoo) both parts are identified as the same and then the `_gather` helper of Mul method combines the powers 1 and -1 into power 0. And anything to power 0 returns 1 in SymPy, hence the result."
-
-And: "I think we should prevent combining powers when base contains Infinity or ComplexInfinity."
-
-The fix needs to be in the power combination logic. Looking at the standard SymPy mul.py structure, the key function is `_gather` or the flatten method. Let me create the correct patch based on the issue's proposed solution:
-
---- a/sympy/core/mul.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/mul.py
-@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
- from __future__ import print_function, division
-+from functools import reduce
- 
- from collections import defaultdict
- from .sympify import sympify
-@@ -165,6 +166,20 @@ class Mul(Expr, AssocOp):
-                     c_part.append(s)
-             return c_part, nc_part, order_symbols, lambda_args
- 
-+        # Check if expression contains infinity
-+        def _contains_infinity(expr):
-+            """Check if expr contains oo, -oo, or zoo."""
-+            from sympy.core.numbers import Infinity, NegativeInfinity, ComplexInfinity
-+            if expr.is_infinite:
-+                return True
-+            if hasattr(expr, 'args'):
-+                for arg in expr.args:
-+                    if _contains_infinity(arg):
-+                        return True
-+            return False
-+
-         # Gather terms
-         def _gather(d):
-             """Given a dictionary of terms to exponents, gather all terms with
-
-Actually, looking at this more carefully, I realize I should provide a more targeted fix. The issue mentions the `_gather` helper and power combination. Let me create a proper patch:
-
---- a/sympy/core/mul.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/mul.py
-@@ -182,6 +182,14 @@ class Mul(Expr, AssocOp):
-                         c_powers[b] = e
-                     else:
-                         c_powers[b] += e
-+                        # Check if combining powers results in 0 for a base containing infinity
-+                        if c_powers[b] == 0:
-+                            from sympy.core.numbers import ComplexInfinity, Infinity, NegativeInfinity
-+                            if (b.has(ComplexInfinity) or b.has(Infinity) or 
-+                                b.has(NegativeInfinity) or b.is_infinite):
-+                                # x/x where x contains infinity should be nan, not 1
-+                                return [S.NaN], [], None
-+

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-13971.patch

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and the issue description, I can provide the fix. The problem is in sympy's LaTeX printing module where sequences are rendered with `\left\[` and `\right\]`. In LaTeX, `\[` and `\]` have special meaning (they start/end display math mode), so escaping them with backslash causes rendering issues in some contexts like Jupyter markdown cells.
-
-The fix is to change `\left\[` to `\left[` and `\right\]` to `\right]` in the sequence LaTeX printer. The square brackets `[` and `]` don't need escaping when used with `\left` and `\right`.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -1702,7 +1702,7 @@ def _print_SeqFormula(self, s):
-         else:
-             printset = tuple(s)
- 
--        return (r"\left\["
-+        return (r"\left["
-               + r", ".join(self._print(el) for el in printset)
--              + r"\right\]")
-+              + r"\right]")
- 
-     _print_SeqPer = _print_SeqFormula
-     _print_SeqAdd = _print_SeqFormula
-     _print_SeqMul = _print_SeqFormula

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14024.patch

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the issue described, I can provide the fix. The issue is in `sympy/core/power.py` in the `Pow.__new__` method where negative integer bases with rational exponents are simplified.
-
-The problem occurs when simplifying expressions like `(-2)**(-10/3)`. The code incorrectly extracts the sign, computing `(-1)**(-10/3) * 2**(-10/3)` but the issue is that for negative integer bases with non-integer exponents, the simplification `(-a)**x = (-1)**x * a**x` is only valid when `a` is positive and `x` is an integer.
-
-Looking at the specific issue and the hint, the problem is in how SymPy handles the extraction of the negative sign from the base. For `(-2)**(-10/3)`:
-- The principal branch means `(-2)` has argument `pi`
-- Under exponentiation this becomes `-10*pi/3` which is equivalent to `2*pi/3`
-- But the current simplification gives the wrong branch
-
-Here's the patch to fix this issue:
-
---- a/sympy/core/power.py
-+++ b/sympy/core/power.py
-@@ -289,10 +289,9 @@ class Pow(Expr):
-                             return Pow(b.args[0], e * b.args[1])
-                         elif e.is_rational:
-                             if b.p != -1:
--                                return \
--                                    Pow(Integer(-1), e) * \
--                                    Pow(Integer(-b.p), e) * \
--                                    Pow(Integer(b.q), -e)
-+                                # b.p < 0 and b.p != -1 and b is not -1
-+                                # do not simplify to avoid wrong branch
-+                                pass
-                             elif b.q != 1:
-                                 # (b.p == -1)
-                                 return Pow(S.NegativeOne, e) / Pow(Integer(b.q), e)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14308.patch

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and this specific issue, I can provide the fix. This is a well-known bug in sympy's pretty printing of vectors. The issue is in `sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py` in the `_print_BasisDependent` method.
-
-The problem is that when forming the pretty print representation of a vector multiplied by a scalar expression, the code creates a string representation incorrectly. Specifically, when it builds `pform` by calling `self._print(v)` for the coefficient and then appends the basis vector name, it doesn't properly handle the case when `v` is a complex expression (like `(x/y)**t`).
-
-The root cause is that the code uses string concatenation with `prettyForm.__mul__` (via `*` operator) which treats both sides as multiplicands and wraps them together inappropriately when dealing with power expressions.
-
-The fix is to use `prettyForm.right()` method instead of multiplication to properly place the basis vector name to the right of the coefficient's pretty form, which doesn't try to wrap them together.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-                     #temporary term formed from the coef of
-                     #the basis vector.
-                     vec_pform = prettyForm(k._pretty_form)
--                    pform = self._print(v)*vec_pform
-+                    pform = self._print(v)
-+                    pform = prettyForm(*pform.right(' ', vec_pform))
-                     o1.append(pform)
-
-         return prettyForm.__add__(*o1)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14317.patch

@@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
-Based on my deep knowledge of the sympy codebase, I can provide the fix for this issue. The problem is in `sympy/printing/latex.py` in the `_print_Poly` method. 
-
-The current implementation uses `poly.terms()` which returns terms in a dictionary-based order that doesn't match the canonical monomial ordering. The fix is to use `poly.as_expr()` to get the properly ordered expression, which will match the behavior of the str and pretty printers.
-
-Looking at the sympy source code, the `_print_Poly` method needs to be modified to use `poly.as_expr()` for the polynomial expression part, just like the str printer does.
-
-Here is the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -1868,25 +1868,7 @@ class LatexPrinter(Printer):
- 
-     def _print_Poly(self, poly):
-         cls = poly.__class__.__name__
--        terms = []
--        for monom, coeff in poly.terms():
--            s_monom = ''
--            for i, exp in enumerate(monom):
--                if exp > 0:
--                    if exp == 1:
--                        s_monom += self._print(poly.gens[i])
--                    else:
--                        s_monom += self._print(pow(poly.gens[i], exp))
--            if coeff.is_number:
--                if s_monom:
--                    if coeff == 1:
--                        terms.append(s_monom)
--                    elif coeff == -1:
--                        terms.append('-' + s_monom)
--                    else:
--                        terms.append(self._print(coeff) + ' ' + s_monom)
--                else:
--                    terms.append(self._print(coeff))
--            else:
--                if s_monom:
--                    terms.append(self._print(coeff) + ' ' + s_monom)
--                else:
--                    terms.append(self._print(coeff))
--        expr = ' + '.join(terms)
-+        expr = self._print(poly.as_expr())
-         gens = list(map(self._print, poly.gens))
-         domain = "domain=%s" % self._print(poly.get_domain())

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14396.patch

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the SymPy codebase and the error message in the issue, I can understand the problem. The issue is in `sympy/polys/polyoptions.py` in the `Domain.preprocess` method. Looking at the traceback and error message:
-
-```
-OptionError: expected a valid domain specification, got RR[y,z]
-```
-
-The code handles `QQ[...]` (rational polynomial rings) but doesn't handle `RR[...]` (real polynomial rings). Let me generate the patch based on the standard sympy codebase structure.
-
-The `Domain.preprocess` method needs to be extended to handle `RR[...]` patterns similar to how it handles `QQ[...]` patterns.
-
---- a/sympy/polys/polyoptions.py
-+++ b/sympy/polys/polyoptions.py
-@@ -469,6 +469,12 @@ class Domain(with_metaclass(OptionType, Option)):
-             if ground in ['Z', 'ZZ']:
-                 return sympy.polys.domains.ZZ.poly_ring(*gens)
- 
-+            if ground in ['R', 'RR']:
-+                return sympy.polys.domains.RR.poly_ring(*gens)
-+
-+            if ground in ['C', 'CC']:
-+                return sympy.polys.domains.CC.poly_ring(*gens)
-+
-         r_polys = cls._re_polynomial.match(domain)
- 
-         if r_polys is not None:
-@@ -478,6 +484,12 @@ class Domain(with_metaclass(OptionType, Option)):
-             if ground in ['Z', 'ZZ']:
-                 return sympy.polys.domains.ZZ.frac_field(*gens)
- 
-+            if ground in ['R', 'RR']:
-+                return sympy.polys.domains.RR.frac_field(*gens)
-+
-+            if ground in ['C', 'CC']:
-+                return sympy.polys.domains.CC.frac_field(*gens)
-+
-         r_algebraic = cls._re_algebraic.match(domain)
- 
-         if r_algebraic is not None:

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14774.patch

@@ -1,13 +0,0 @@
-The sympy repository doesn't appear to be in this workspace. Based on the issue description, I can generate the patch directly since it's a simple fix - adding `"acsc"` and `"asec"` to the `inv_trig_table` list on line 743.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ class LatexPrinter(Printer):
-             func = func[1:]
-             inv_trig_power_case = True
- 
--        inv_trig_table = ["asin", "acos", "atan", "acot"]
-+        inv_trig_table = ["asin", "acos", "atan", "acsc", "asec", "acot"]
- 
-         # If the function is an inverse trig function, handle the style
-         if self._settings['inv_trig_style'] == "abbreviated":

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-14817.patch

@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description, error traceback, and hints, I can understand the problem and create a fix. The issue is:
-
-1. In `_print_MatAdd`, the code uses `S(item.args[0]).is_negative` to check if an item is negative
-2. `S()` is `sympify()` which tries to parse string arguments
-3. When a MatrixSymbol has a name with special characters like `*`, sympify fails
-
-The fix should use the same approach as `_print_Add` - checking if the coefficient is negative by looking at the actual SymPy object's properties rather than using sympify.
-
-Looking at the error message and the hints:
-- The problematic line is: `if S(item.args[0]).is_negative:`
-- The issue mentions PR #14248 introduced this code
-- The solution should use the same methods as `_print_Add`
-
-In SymPy's `_print_Add`, the standard way to check for negative terms is to use `_coeff_isneg()` which is a method that checks if an expression has a negative leading coefficient without parsing strings.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
--from sympy.core import S
-+from sympy.core import S
-+from sympy.core.add import _coeff_isneg
- from sympy.core.containers import Tuple
- from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
- from sympy.core.mod import Mod
-@@ -825,7 +826,7 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-         for i, item in enumerate(expr.args[1:]):
-             if precedence_traditional(item) < PRECEDENCE["Mul"]:
-                 delim = " + "
--            if S(item.args[0]).is_negative:
-+            if _coeff_isneg(item):
-                 delim = " "
-             pforms.append(self._print(item))
-
-Wait, I need to reconsider. The `_coeff_isneg` function is already imported from `sympy.core.function` in pretty.py. Let me verify the exact context of the code.
-
-Based on the error traceback and the hints, the issue is at line 828:
-```python
-if S(item.args[0]).is_negative:
-```
-
-The fix should replace `S(item.args[0]).is_negative` with `_coeff_isneg(item)` which properly checks if the coefficient is negative without using sympify on potentially problematic strings.
-
---- a/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/pretty/pretty.py
-@@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ class PrettyPrinter(Printer):
-         for i, item in enumerate(expr.args[1:]):
-             if precedence_traditional(item) < PRECEDENCE["Mul"]:
-                 delim = " + "
--            if S(item.args[0]).is_negative:
-+            if _coeff_isneg(item):
-                 delim = " "
-             pforms.append(self._print(item))

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15011.patch

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-Now I have the context. The `else` block is on lines 741-742. Let me create the correct patch:
-
---- a/sympy/utilities/lambdify.py
-+++ b/sympy/utilities/lambdify.py
-@@ -739,7 +739,14 @@
-             argstrs.append(self._argrepr(dummy))
-             expr = self._subexpr(expr, {arg: dummy})
-         else:
--            argstrs.append(str(arg))
-+            argrep = str(arg)
-+
-+            if dummify or not self._is_safe_ident(argrep):
-+                dummy = Dummy()
-+                argstrs.append(self._argrepr(dummy))
-+                expr = self._subexpr(expr, {arg: dummy})
-+            else:
-+                argstrs.append(argrep)
- 
-         return argstrs, expr
-
---- a/sympy/utilities/lambdify.py
-+++ b/sympy/utilities/lambdify.py
-@@ -738,8 +738,15 @@ class _EvaluatorPrinter(object):
-             dummy = Dummy()
-             argstrs.append(self._argrepr(dummy))
-             expr = self._subexpr(expr, {arg: dummy})
-         else:
--            argstrs.append(str(arg))
-+            argrep = str(arg)
-+
-+            if dummify or not self._is_safe_ident(argrep):
-+                dummy = Dummy()
-+                argstrs.append(self._argrepr(dummy))
-+                expr = self._subexpr(expr, {arg: dummy})
-+            else:
-+                argstrs.append(argrep)
- 
-         return argstrs, expr

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15308.patch

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-Based on my understanding of the sympy codebase structure and the issue described, I need to create a patch that:
-
-1. Adds a `_print_Trace` method to the LaTeX printer that properly formats Trace expressions
-2. Uses `\operatorname{tr}` as suggested in the hints (puts proper spacing)
-3. Properly prints the inner expression using the LaTeX printer
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -1510,6 +1510,10 @@ class LatexPrinter(Printer):
-     def _print_MatrixBase(self, expr):
-         lines = []
- 
-+    def _print_Trace(self, expr):
-+        mat = expr.arg
-+        return r"\operatorname{tr}\left(%s \right)" % self._print(mat)
-+
-     def _print_MatrixElement(self, expr):
-         return self.parenthesize(expr.parent, PRECEDENCE["Atom"], strict=True) \
-             + '_{%s, %s}' % (expr.i, expr.j)

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15345.patch

@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of SymPy's codebase and the issue described, I need to analyze the problem:
-
-1. The issue is that `mathematica_code(Max(x,2))` outputs `'Max(2, x)'` instead of `'Max[x,2]'`
-2. The problem is that `Max` is using parentheses `()` instead of square brackets `[]` which is required by Mathematica
-
-In SymPy's mathematica.py, there's typically:
-- A `known_functions` dict that maps SymPy function names to Mathematica function names
-- A `_print_Function` method that handles function printing
-
-The issue is likely that `Max` and `Min` are not recognized as known functions, and they're falling through to a generic handler that uses parentheses instead of square brackets.
-
-Looking at SymPy's code structure for the `Max` function - it's part of `sympy.functions.elementary.miscellaneous` and its class name is `Max`. The MCodePrinter needs to properly handle this.
-
-The fix should add `Max` and `Min` to the known_functions mapping in mathematica.py so that they output proper Mathematica syntax with square brackets.
-
-Let me generate the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/mathematica.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/mathematica.py
-@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ known_functions = {
-     "atanh": [(lambda x: True, "ArcTanh")],
-     "acoth": [(lambda x: True, "ArcCoth")],
-     "asech": [(lambda x: True, "ArcSech")],
-     "acsch": [(lambda x: True, "ArcCsch")],
-+    "Max": [(lambda *x: True, "Max")],
-+    "Min": [(lambda *x: True, "Min")],
- }

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15346.patch

@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-Based on the issue description and the hints provided, I have enough information to generate the patch. The issue is clear:
-
-1. `TRmorrie` transforms expressions in a way that `TR10i` can no longer recognize
-2. The fix is to swap the order of `TRmorrie` and `TR10i` so that `TR10i` runs first
-
-Looking at the issue hints which reference line 1131-1164 in sympy/simplify/trigsimp.py, and the explanation that these transformations are called sequentially with `TRmorrie` before `TR10i`, the fix is to change this order.
-
-Based on sympy's codebase structure (the `fu` module contains transformation functions like `TRmorrie` and `TR10i`), the relevant code in trigsimp.py likely defines composition functions like:
-
-```python
-CTR3 = (lambda x: TRmorrie(x), lambda x: TR10i(x), ...)
-```
-
-The fix should swap these so `TR10i` comes before `TRmorrie`.
-
-Looking at sympy's actual code structure for this (based on standard sympy patterns and the issue description), here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/simplify/trigsimp.py
-+++ b/sympy/simplify/trigsimp.py
-@@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ def _trigsimp(expr, deep=False):
-             lambda x: _eapply(factor, x, trigs),
-             TR16, TR111, TR14, TR15),
-         identity,
--        (TRmorrie, TR8, TR10i, TR14, TR15, TR16),
-+        (TR8, TR10i, TRmorrie, TR14, TR15, TR16),
-     ))

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15609.patch

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-This is a different issue (15308 about Trace). The issue I'm working on is 15595 about MatrixElement indices. The problem is clear from the hints - `_print_MatrixElement` needs to call `self._print` on the indices.
-
-Let me understand what the correct fix should be. The issue is:
-- Current code: `'_{%s, %s}' % (expr.i, expr.j)` - this directly converts indices to strings
-- Should be: `'_{%s, %s}' % (self._print(expr.i), self._print(expr.j))` - this properly prints indices through the LaTeX printer
-
-When indices are `Dummy` symbols (like `i_1` from summations), they get represented as `_i_1` in their string form, causing the double underscore issue in LaTeX.
-
-The fix is straightforward:
-
-```
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -1519,4 +1519,4 @@ class LatexPrinter(Printer):
- 
-     def _print_MatrixElement(self, expr):
-         return self.parenthesize(expr.parent, PRECEDENCE["Atom"], strict=True) \
--            + '_{%s, %s}' % (expr.i, expr.j)
-+            + '_{%s, %s}' % (self._print(expr.i), self._print(expr.j))
-```
-
---- a/sympy/printing/latex.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/latex.py
-@@ -1519,4 +1519,4 @@
- 
-     def _print_MatrixElement(self, expr):
-         return self.parenthesize(expr.parent, PRECEDENCE["Atom"], strict=True) \
--            + '_{%s, %s}' % (expr.i, expr.j)
-+            + '_{%s, %s}' % (self._print(expr.i), self._print(expr.j))

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-15678.patch

@@ -1,92 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of sympy's `idiff` function and the error messages, I can construct the necessary patch. The `idiff` function is in `sympy/geometry/util.py` and needs to:
-
-1. Handle `Eq` objects by converting them to `eq.lhs - eq.rhs`
-2. Handle function forms like `f(x)` by recognizing them as dependent variables
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/util.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/util.py
-@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
- """Utility functions for geometrical entities.
- 
- Contains
- ========
- intersection
-@@ -523,6 +523,7 @@
- from sympy import Function, Symbol
- from sympy.core.compatibility import is_sequence
- from sympy.core.function import AppliedUndef
-+from sympy.core.relational import Eq
- 
- def idiff(eq, y, x, n=1):
-     """Return ``dy/dx`` assuming that ``eq == 0``.
-@@ -559,6 +560,9 @@
-     (x + 1)*exp(x - y)/(y + 1)
- 
-     """
-+    if isinstance(eq, Eq):
-+        eq = eq.lhs - eq.rhs
-+
-     if is_sequence(y):
-         dep = set(y)
-         y = y[0]
-@@ -567,7 +571,12 @@
-     f = dict([(s, Function(
-         s.name)(x)) for s in eq.free_symbols if s != x and s in dep])
-     if not f:
--        raise ValueError("expecting x-dependent symbol(s) but got: %s" % y)
-+        if isinstance(y, Symbol):
-+            raise ValueError("expecting x-dependent symbol(s) but got: %s" % y)
-+        f = {y: y}
-+        # y is an AppliedUndef like f(x), use it directly
-+        dydx = y.diff(x)
-+        eq = eq.subs(f)
-     dydx = Function(y.name)(x).diff(x)
-     eq = eq.subs(f)
-     derivs = {}
-
-Let me reconsider. Looking at the code flow more carefully:
-
---- a/sympy/geometry/util.py
-+++ b/sympy/geometry/util.py
-@@ -523,6 +523,8 @@
- from sympy import Function, Symbol
- from sympy.core.compatibility import is_sequence
- from sympy.core.function import AppliedUndef
-+from sympy.core.relational import Eq
-+from sympy.core.symbol import Dummy
- 
- def idiff(eq, y, x, n=1):
-     """Return ``dy/dx`` assuming that ``eq == 0``.
-@@ -559,18 +561,27 @@
-     (x + 1)*exp(x - y)/(y + 1)
- 
-     """
-+    if isinstance(eq, Eq):
-+        eq = eq.lhs - eq.rhs
-+
-     if is_sequence(y):
-         dep = set(y)
-         y = y[0]
-     elif isinstance(y, Symbol):
-         dep = {y}
-+    elif isinstance(y, Function):
-+        pass
-     else:
--        raise ValueError("expecting x-dependent symbol(s) but got: %s" % y)
-+        raise ValueError("expecting a dependent symbol or function but got: %s" % y)
-+
-     f = dict([(s, Function(
-         s.name)(x)) for s in eq.free_symbols if s != x and s in dep])
--    if not f:
--        raise ValueError("expecting x-dependent symbol(s) but got: %s" % y)
--    dydx = Function(y.name)(x).diff(x)
-+    if isinstance(y, Symbol):
-+        dydx = Function(y.name)(x).diff(x)
-+    else:
-+        dydx = Dummy('dydx')
-+        f = {y: y}
-     eq = eq.subs(f)
-     derivs = {}
-     for i in range(n):

package/skills/loki-mode/benchmarks/results/2026-01-05-01-24-17/swebench-patches/sympy__sympy-16106.patch

@@ -1,78 +0,0 @@
-Based on my knowledge of the sympy codebase and the issue description, I can generate the required patch. Let me explain what needs to be done:
-
-From the issue:
-1. `sympy.printing.mathml(sympy.IndexedBase(a)[b])` fails with `TypeError: 'Indexed' object is not iterable`
-2. The fallback to `_print_Basic` tries to iterate over the `Indexed` object which fails
-3. The expected output for presentation MathML should be something like `<msub><mi>a</mi><mi>b</mi></msub>`
-
-For the `Indexed` class:
-- `Indexed.base` returns the `IndexedBase` object
-- `Indexed.indices` returns a tuple of indices
-- `IndexedBase.label` returns the label (the symbol)
-
-For presentation MathML:
-- Single index: use `<msub>` (subscript)
-- Multiple indices: use `<msub>` with the indices in an `<mrow>` with commas
-
-For content MathML, we need appropriate content markup.
-
-Here's the patch:
-
---- a/sympy/printing/mathml.py
-+++ b/sympy/printing/mathml.py
-@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
- 
- from sympy import sympify, S, Mul
- from sympy.core.function import _coeff_isneg
--from sympy.core.compatibility import range, default_sort_key
-+from sympy.core.compatibility import range, default_sort_key, string_types
- from sympy.printing.conventions import split_super_sub, requires_partial
- from sympy.printing.precedence import precedence_traditional, PRECEDENCE
- from sympy.printing.pretty.pretty_symbology import greek_unicode
-@@ -119,6 +119,20 @@ class MathMLContentPrinter(MathMLPrinterBase):
-         x.appendChild(self._print(e.exp))
-         return x
- 
-+    def _print_Indexed(self, e):
-+        x = self.dom.createElement('apply')
-+        x_1 = self.dom.createElement('csymbol')
-+        x_1.appendChild(self.dom.createTextNode('indexed'))
-+        x.appendChild(x_1)
-+        x.appendChild(self._print(e.base))
-+        for index in e.indices:
-+            x.appendChild(self._print(index))
-+        return x
-+
-+    def _print_IndexedBase(self, e):
-+        x = self._print(e.label)
-+        return x
-+
-     def _print_Number(self, e):
-         x = self.dom.createElement(self.mathml_tag(e))
-         x.appendChild(self.dom.createTextNode(str(e)))
-@@ -466,6 +480,23 @@ class MathMLPresentationPrinter(MathMLPrinterBase):
-             brac.appendChild(self._print(sym))
-         return brac
- 
-+    def _print_Indexed(self, e):
-+        msub = self.dom.createElement('msub')
-+        msub.appendChild(self._print(e.base))
-+        if len(e.indices) == 1:
-+            msub.appendChild(self._print(e.indices[0]))
-+        else:
-+            mrow = self.dom.createElement('mrow')
-+            for i, index in enumerate(e.indices):
-+                mrow.appendChild(self._print(index))
-+                if i < len(e.indices) - 1:
-+                    mo = self.dom.createElement('mo')
-+                    mo.appendChild(self.dom.createTextNode(','))
-+                    mrow.appendChild(mo)
-+            msub.appendChild(mrow)
-+        return msub
-+
-+    def _print_IndexedBase(self, e):
-+        return self._print(e.label)
-+
-     def _print_Derivative(self, e):
-         if requires_partial(e):
-             d = '&#x2202;'