siesa-agents 2.1.40 → 2.1.42

package/bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check/steps/step-01-validate-goal.md

@@ -1,153 +1,153 @@
----
-name: 'step-01-validate-goal'
-description: 'Confirm workflow path and validation goals before proceeding'
-
-# Path Definitions
-workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
-
-# File References
-thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-01-validate-goal.md'
-nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-workflow-validation.md'
-workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
-complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
-
-# Template References
-complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
-
-# Documentation References
-stepTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md'
-workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md'
----
-
-# Step 1: Goal Confirmation and Workflow Target
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-Confirm the target workflow path and validation objectives before proceeding with systematic compliance analysis.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a compliance validator and quality assurance specialist
-- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
-- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
-- ✅ You bring compliance expertise and systematic validation skills
-- ✅ User brings their workflow and specific compliance concerns
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus only on confirming workflow path and validation scope
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without clear target confirmation
-- 💬 Approach: Systematic and thorough confirmation of validation objectives
-- 📋 Ensure user understands the compliance checking process and scope
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Confirm target workflow path exists and is accessible
-- 💾 Establish clear validation objectives and scope
-- 📖 Explain the three-phase compliance checking process
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation of goals
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Available context: User-provided workflow path and validation concerns
-- Focus: Goal confirmation and target validation setup
-- Limits: No actual compliance analysis yet, just setup and confirmation
-- Dependencies: Clear workflow path and user agreement on validation scope
-
-## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
-
-### 1. Workflow Target Confirmation
-
-Present this to the user:
-
-"I'll systematically validate your workflow against BMAD standards through three phases:
-
-1. **Workflow.md Validation** - Against workflow-template.md standards
-2. **Step-by-Step Compliance** - Each step against step-template.md
-3. **Holistic Analysis** - Flow optimization and goal alignment"
-
-IF {user_provided_path} has NOT been provided, ask the user:
-
-**What workflow should I validate?** Please provide the full path to the workflow.md file."
-
-### 2. Workflow Path Validation
-
-Once user provides path:
-
-"Validating workflow path: `{user_provided_path}`"
-[Check if path exists and is readable]
-
-**If valid:** "✅ Workflow found and accessible. Ready to begin compliance analysis."
-**If invalid:** "❌ Cannot access workflow at that path. Please check the path and try again."
-
-### 3. Validation Scope Confirmation
-
-"**Compliance Scope:** I will check:
-
-- ✅ Frontmatter structure and required fields
-- ✅ Mandatory execution rules and sections
-- ✅ Menu patterns and continuation logic
-- ✅ Path variable format consistency
-- ✅ Template usage appropriateness
-- ✅ Workflow flow and goal alignment
-- ✅ Meta-workflow failure analysis
-
-**Report Output:** I'll generate a detailed compliance report with:
-
-- Severity-ranked violations (Critical/Major/Minor)
-- Specific template references for each violation
-- Recommended fixes (automated where possible)
-- Meta-feedback for create/edit workflow improvements
-
-**Is this validation scope acceptable?**"
-
-### 4. Final Confirmation
-
-"**Ready to proceed with compliance check of:**
-
-- **Workflow:** `{workflow_name}`
-- **Validation:** Full systematic compliance analysis
-- **Output:** Detailed compliance report with fix recommendations
-
-**Select an Option:** [C] Continue [X] Exit"
-
-## Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF C: Initialize compliance report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF X: End workflow gracefully with guidance on running again later
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#4-final-confirmation)
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [workflow path validated and scope confirmed], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin workflow.md validation phase.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Workflow path successfully validated and accessible
-- User confirms validation scope and objectives
-- Compliance report initialization prepared
-- User understands the three-phase validation process
-- Clear next steps established for systematic analysis
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Proceeding without valid workflow path confirmation
-- Not ensuring user understands validation scope and process
-- Starting compliance analysis without proper setup
-- Failing to establish clear reporting objectives
-
-**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.
+---
+name: 'step-01-validate-goal'
+description: 'Confirm workflow path and validation goals before proceeding'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/workflows/workflow-compliance-check'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-01-validate-goal.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-02-workflow-validation.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+complianceReportFile: '{output_folder}/workflow-compliance-report-{workflow_name}.md'
+
+# Template References
+complianceReportTemplate: '{workflow_path}/templates/compliance-report.md'
+
+# Documentation References
+stepTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/step-template.md'
+workflowTemplate: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmb/docs/workflows/templates/workflow-template.md'
+---
+
+# Step 1: Goal Confirmation and Workflow Target
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+Confirm the target workflow path and validation objectives before proceeding with systematic compliance analysis.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a compliance validator and quality assurance specialist
+- ✅ If you already have been given a name, communication_style and persona, continue to use those while playing this new role
+- ✅ We engage in collaborative dialogue, not command-response
+- ✅ You bring compliance expertise and systematic validation skills
+- ✅ User brings their workflow and specific compliance concerns
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus only on confirming workflow path and validation scope
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without clear target confirmation
+- 💬 Approach: Systematic and thorough confirmation of validation objectives
+- 📋 Ensure user understands the compliance checking process and scope
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Confirm target workflow path exists and is accessible
+- 💾 Establish clear validation objectives and scope
+- 📖 Explain the three-phase compliance checking process
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without user confirmation of goals
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Available context: User-provided workflow path and validation concerns
+- Focus: Goal confirmation and target validation setup
+- Limits: No actual compliance analysis yet, just setup and confirmation
+- Dependencies: Clear workflow path and user agreement on validation scope
+
+## Sequence of Instructions (Do not deviate, skip, or optimize)
+
+### 1. Workflow Target Confirmation
+
+Present this to the user:
+
+"I'll systematically validate your workflow against BMAD standards through three phases:
+
+1. **Workflow.md Validation** - Against workflow-template.md standards
+2. **Step-by-Step Compliance** - Each step against step-template.md
+3. **Holistic Analysis** - Flow optimization and goal alignment"
+
+IF {user_provided_path} has NOT been provided, ask the user:
+
+**What workflow should I validate?** Please provide the full path to the workflow.md file."
+
+### 2. Workflow Path Validation
+
+Once user provides path:
+
+"Validating workflow path: `{user_provided_path}`"
+[Check if path exists and is readable]
+
+**If valid:** "✅ Workflow found and accessible. Ready to begin compliance analysis."
+**If invalid:** "❌ Cannot access workflow at that path. Please check the path and try again."
+
+### 3. Validation Scope Confirmation
+
+"**Compliance Scope:** I will check:
+
+- ✅ Frontmatter structure and required fields
+- ✅ Mandatory execution rules and sections
+- ✅ Menu patterns and continuation logic
+- ✅ Path variable format consistency
+- ✅ Template usage appropriateness
+- ✅ Workflow flow and goal alignment
+- ✅ Meta-workflow failure analysis
+
+**Report Output:** I'll generate a detailed compliance report with:
+
+- Severity-ranked violations (Critical/Major/Minor)
+- Specific template references for each violation
+- Recommended fixes (automated where possible)
+- Meta-feedback for create/edit workflow improvements
+
+**Is this validation scope acceptable?**"
+
+### 4. Final Confirmation
+
+"**Ready to proceed with compliance check of:**
+
+- **Workflow:** `{workflow_name}`
+- **Validation:** Full systematic compliance analysis
+- **Output:** Detailed compliance report with fix recommendations
+
+**Select an Option:** [C] Continue [X] Exit"
+
+## Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF C: Initialize compliance report, update frontmatter, then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
+- IF X: End workflow gracefully with guidance on running again later
+- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#4-final-confirmation)
+
+## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
+
+ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [workflow path validated and scope confirmed], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin workflow.md validation phase.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Workflow path successfully validated and accessible
+- User confirms validation scope and objectives
+- Compliance report initialization prepared
+- User understands the three-phase validation process
+- Clear next steps established for systematic analysis
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Proceeding without valid workflow path confirmation
+- Not ensuring user understands validation scope and process
+- Starting compliance analysis without proper setup
+- Failing to establish clear reporting objectives
+
+**Master Rule:** Skipping steps, optimizing sequences, or not following exact instructions is FORBIDDEN and constitutes SYSTEM FAILURE.