siesa-agents 2.1.40 → 2.1.42

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md

@@ -1,179 +1,179 @@
----
-name: 'step-03-epic-coverage-validation'
-description: 'Validate that all PRD FRs are covered in epics and stories'
-
-# Path Definitions
-workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/implementation-readiness'
-
-# File References
-thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md'
-nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-04-ux-alignment.md'
-workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
----
-
-# Step 3: Epic Coverage Validation
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To validate that all Functional Requirements from the PRD are captured in the epics and stories document, identifying any gaps in coverage.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are an expert Product Manager and Scrum Master
-- ✅ Your expertise is in requirements traceability
-- ✅ You ensure no requirements fall through the cracks
-- ✅ Success is measured in complete FR coverage
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on FR coverage validation
-- 🚫 Don't analyze story quality (that's later)
-- 💬 Compare PRD FRs against epic coverage list
-- 🚪 Document every missing FR
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load epics document completely
-- 💾 Extract FR coverage from epics
-- 📖 Compare against PRD FR list
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without documenting gaps
-
-## EPIC COVERAGE VALIDATION PROCESS:
-
-### 1. Initialize Coverage Validation
-
-"Beginning **Epic Coverage Validation**.
-
-I will:
-
-1. Load the epics and stories document
-2. Extract FR coverage information
-3. Compare against PRD FRs from previous step
-4. Identify any FRs not covered in epics"
-
-### 2. Load Epics Document
-
-From the document inventory in step 1:
-
-- Load the epics and stories document (whole or sharded)
-- Read it completely to find FR coverage information
-- Look for sections like "FR Coverage Map" or similar
-
-### 3. Extract Epic FR Coverage
-
-From the epics document:
-
-- Find FR coverage mapping or list
-- Extract which FR numbers are claimed to be covered
-- Document which epics cover which FRs
-
-Format as:
-
-```
-## Epic FR Coverage Extracted
-
-FR1: Covered in Epic X
-FR2: Covered in Epic Y
-FR3: Covered in Epic Z
-...
-Total FRs in epics: [count]
-```
-
-### 4. Compare Coverage Against PRD
-
-Using the PRD FR list from step 2:
-
-- Check each PRD FR against epic coverage
-- Identify FRs NOT covered in epics
-- Note any FRs in epics but NOT in PRD
-
-Create coverage matrix:
-
-```
-## FR Coverage Analysis
-
-| FR Number | PRD Requirement | Epic Coverage  | Status    |
-| --------- | --------------- | -------------- | --------- |
-| FR1       | [PRD text]      | Epic X Story Y | ✓ Covered |
-| FR2       | [PRD text]      | **NOT FOUND**  | ❌ MISSING |
-| FR3       | [PRD text]      | Epic Z Story A | ✓ Covered |
-```
-
-### 5. Document Missing Coverage
-
-List all FRs not covered:
-
-```
-## Missing FR Coverage
-
-### Critical Missing FRs
-
-FR#: [Full requirement text from PRD]
-- Impact: [Why this is critical]
-- Recommendation: [Which epic should include this]
-
-### High Priority Missing FRs
-
-[List any other uncovered FRs]
-```
-
-### 6. Add to Assessment Report
-
-Append to {outputFile}:
-
-```markdown
-## Epic Coverage Validation
-
-### Coverage Matrix
-
-[Complete coverage matrix from section 4]
-
-### Missing Requirements
-
-[List of uncovered FRs from section 5]
-
-### Coverage Statistics
-
-- Total PRD FRs: [count]
-- FRs covered in epics: [count]
-- Coverage percentage: [percentage]
-```
-
-### 7. Auto-Proceed to Next Step
-
-After coverage validation complete, immediately load next step.
-
-## PROCEEDING TO UX ALIGNMENT
-
-Epic coverage validation complete. Loading next step for UX alignment.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- Epics document loaded completely
-- FR coverage extracted accurately
-- All gaps identified and documented
-- Coverage matrix created
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not reading complete epics document
-- Missing FRs in comparison
-- Not documenting uncovered requirements
-- Incomplete coverage analysis
-
-**Master Rule:** Every FR must have a traceable implementation path.
+---
+name: 'step-03-epic-coverage-validation'
+description: 'Validate that all PRD FRs are covered in epics and stories'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/implementation-readiness'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-03-epic-coverage-validation.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-04-ux-alignment.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
+---
+
+# Step 3: Epic Coverage Validation
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To validate that all Functional Requirements from the PRD are captured in the epics and stories document, identifying any gaps in coverage.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are an expert Product Manager and Scrum Master
+- ✅ Your expertise is in requirements traceability
+- ✅ You ensure no requirements fall through the cracks
+- ✅ Success is measured in complete FR coverage
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus ONLY on FR coverage validation
+- 🚫 Don't analyze story quality (that's later)
+- 💬 Compare PRD FRs against epic coverage list
+- 🚪 Document every missing FR
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Load epics document completely
+- 💾 Extract FR coverage from epics
+- 📖 Compare against PRD FR list
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without documenting gaps
+
+## EPIC COVERAGE VALIDATION PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Initialize Coverage Validation
+
+"Beginning **Epic Coverage Validation**.
+
+I will:
+
+1. Load the epics and stories document
+2. Extract FR coverage information
+3. Compare against PRD FRs from previous step
+4. Identify any FRs not covered in epics"
+
+### 2. Load Epics Document
+
+From the document inventory in step 1:
+
+- Load the epics and stories document (whole or sharded)
+- Read it completely to find FR coverage information
+- Look for sections like "FR Coverage Map" or similar
+
+### 3. Extract Epic FR Coverage
+
+From the epics document:
+
+- Find FR coverage mapping or list
+- Extract which FR numbers are claimed to be covered
+- Document which epics cover which FRs
+
+Format as:
+
+```
+## Epic FR Coverage Extracted
+
+FR1: Covered in Epic X
+FR2: Covered in Epic Y
+FR3: Covered in Epic Z
+...
+Total FRs in epics: [count]
+```
+
+### 4. Compare Coverage Against PRD
+
+Using the PRD FR list from step 2:
+
+- Check each PRD FR against epic coverage
+- Identify FRs NOT covered in epics
+- Note any FRs in epics but NOT in PRD
+
+Create coverage matrix:
+
+```
+## FR Coverage Analysis
+
+| FR Number | PRD Requirement | Epic Coverage  | Status    |
+| --------- | --------------- | -------------- | --------- |
+| FR1       | [PRD text]      | Epic X Story Y | ✓ Covered |
+| FR2       | [PRD text]      | **NOT FOUND**  | ❌ MISSING |
+| FR3       | [PRD text]      | Epic Z Story A | ✓ Covered |
+```
+
+### 5. Document Missing Coverage
+
+List all FRs not covered:
+
+```
+## Missing FR Coverage
+
+### Critical Missing FRs
+
+FR#: [Full requirement text from PRD]
+- Impact: [Why this is critical]
+- Recommendation: [Which epic should include this]
+
+### High Priority Missing FRs
+
+[List any other uncovered FRs]
+```
+
+### 6. Add to Assessment Report
+
+Append to {outputFile}:
+
+```markdown
+## Epic Coverage Validation
+
+### Coverage Matrix
+
+[Complete coverage matrix from section 4]
+
+### Missing Requirements
+
+[List of uncovered FRs from section 5]
+
+### Coverage Statistics
+
+- Total PRD FRs: [count]
+- FRs covered in epics: [count]
+- Coverage percentage: [percentage]
+```
+
+### 7. Auto-Proceed to Next Step
+
+After coverage validation complete, immediately load next step.
+
+## PROCEEDING TO UX ALIGNMENT
+
+Epic coverage validation complete. Loading next step for UX alignment.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- Epics document loaded completely
+- FR coverage extracted accurately
+- All gaps identified and documented
+- Coverage matrix created
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Not reading complete epics document
+- Missing FRs in comparison
+- Not documenting uncovered requirements
+- Incomplete coverage analysis
+
+**Master Rule:** Every FR must have a traceable implementation path.

package/bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/steps/step-04-ux-alignment.md

@@ -1,139 +1,139 @@
----
-name: 'step-04-ux-alignment'
-description: 'Check for UX document and validate alignment with PRD and Architecture'
-
-# Path Definitions
-workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/implementation-readiness'
-
-# File References
-thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-04-ux-alignment.md'
-nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-05-epic-quality-review.md'
-workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
-outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
----
-
-# Step 4: UX Alignment
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To check if UX documentation exists and validate that it aligns with PRD requirements and Architecture decisions, ensuring architecture accounts for both PRD and UX needs.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a UX VALIDATOR ensuring user experience is properly addressed
-- ✅ UX requirements must be supported by architecture
-- ✅ Missing UX documentation is a warning if UI is implied
-- ✅ Alignment gaps must be documented
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Check for UX document existence first
-- 🚫 Don't assume UX is not needed
-- 💬 Validate alignment between UX, PRD, and Architecture
-- 🚪 Add findings to the output report
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Search for UX documentation
-- 💾 If found, validate alignment
-- 📖 If not found, assess if UX is implied
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without completing assessment
-
-## UX ALIGNMENT PROCESS:
-
-### 1. Initialize UX Validation
-
-"Beginning **UX Alignment** validation.
-
-I will:
-
-1. Check if UX documentation exists
-2. If UX exists: validate alignment with PRD and Architecture
-3. If no UX: determine if UX is implied and document warning"
-
-### 2. Search for UX Documentation
-
-Search patterns:
-
-- `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*.md` (whole document)
-- `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*/index.md` (sharded)
-- Look for UI-related terms in other documents
-
-### 3. If UX Document Exists
-
-#### A. UX ↔ PRD Alignment
-
-- Check UX requirements reflected in PRD
-- Verify user journeys in UX match PRD use cases
-- Identify UX requirements not in PRD
-
-#### B. UX ↔ Architecture Alignment
-
-- Verify architecture supports UX requirements
-- Check performance needs (responsiveness, load times)
-- Identify UI components not supported by architecture
-
-### 4. If No UX Document
-
-Assess if UX/UI is implied:
-
-- Does PRD mention user interface?
-- Are there web/mobile components implied?
-- Is this a user-facing application?
-
-If UX implied but missing: Add warning to report
-
-### 5. Add Findings to Report
-
-Append to {outputFile}:
-
-```markdown
-## UX Alignment Assessment
-
-### UX Document Status
-
-[Found/Not Found]
-
-### Alignment Issues
-
-[List any misalignments between UX, PRD, and Architecture]
-
-### Warnings
-
-[Any warnings about missing UX or architectural gaps]
-```
-
-### 6. Auto-Proceed to Next Step
-
-After UX assessment complete, immediately load next step.
-
-## PROCEEDING TO EPIC QUALITY REVIEW
-
-UX alignment assessment complete. Loading next step for epic quality review.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- UX document existence checked
-- Alignment validated if UX exists
-- Warning issued if UX implied but missing
-- Findings added to report
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Not checking for UX document
-- Ignoring alignment issues
-- Not documenting warnings
+---
+name: 'step-04-ux-alignment'
+description: 'Check for UX document and validate alignment with PRD and Architecture'
+
+# Path Definitions
+workflow_path: '{project-root}/_bmad/bmm/workflows/3-solutioning/implementation-readiness'
+
+# File References
+thisStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-04-ux-alignment.md'
+nextStepFile: '{workflow_path}/steps/step-05-epic-quality-review.md'
+workflowFile: '{workflow_path}/workflow.md'
+outputFile: '{planning_artifacts}/implementation-readiness-report-{{date}}.md'
+---
+
+# Step 4: UX Alignment
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To check if UX documentation exists and validate that it aligns with PRD requirements and Architecture decisions, ensuring architecture accounts for both PRD and UX needs.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a UX VALIDATOR ensuring user experience is properly addressed
+- ✅ UX requirements must be supported by architecture
+- ✅ Missing UX documentation is a warning if UI is implied
+- ✅ Alignment gaps must be documented
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Check for UX document existence first
+- 🚫 Don't assume UX is not needed
+- 💬 Validate alignment between UX, PRD, and Architecture
+- 🚪 Add findings to the output report
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Search for UX documentation
+- 💾 If found, validate alignment
+- 📖 If not found, assess if UX is implied
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to proceed without completing assessment
+
+## UX ALIGNMENT PROCESS:
+
+### 1. Initialize UX Validation
+
+"Beginning **UX Alignment** validation.
+
+I will:
+
+1. Check if UX documentation exists
+2. If UX exists: validate alignment with PRD and Architecture
+3. If no UX: determine if UX is implied and document warning"
+
+### 2. Search for UX Documentation
+
+Search patterns:
+
+- `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*.md` (whole document)
+- `{planning_artifacts}/*ux*/index.md` (sharded)
+- Look for UI-related terms in other documents
+
+### 3. If UX Document Exists
+
+#### A. UX ↔ PRD Alignment
+
+- Check UX requirements reflected in PRD
+- Verify user journeys in UX match PRD use cases
+- Identify UX requirements not in PRD
+
+#### B. UX ↔ Architecture Alignment
+
+- Verify architecture supports UX requirements
+- Check performance needs (responsiveness, load times)
+- Identify UI components not supported by architecture
+
+### 4. If No UX Document
+
+Assess if UX/UI is implied:
+
+- Does PRD mention user interface?
+- Are there web/mobile components implied?
+- Is this a user-facing application?
+
+If UX implied but missing: Add warning to report
+
+### 5. Add Findings to Report
+
+Append to {outputFile}:
+
+```markdown
+## UX Alignment Assessment
+
+### UX Document Status
+
+[Found/Not Found]
+
+### Alignment Issues
+
+[List any misalignments between UX, PRD, and Architecture]
+
+### Warnings
+
+[Any warnings about missing UX or architectural gaps]
+```
+
+### 6. Auto-Proceed to Next Step
+
+After UX assessment complete, immediately load next step.
+
+## PROCEEDING TO EPIC QUALITY REVIEW
+
+UX alignment assessment complete. Loading next step for epic quality review.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- UX document existence checked
+- Alignment validated if UX exists
+- Warning issued if UX implied but missing
+- Findings added to report
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Not checking for UX document
+- Ignoring alignment issues
+- Not documenting warnings