rn-leveldb 3.11.0

package/cpp/leveldb/third_party/googletest/googletest/docs/primer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,579 @@
+# Googletest Primer
+
+## Introduction: Why googletest?
+
+*googletest* helps you write better C++ tests.
+
+googletest is a testing framework developed by the Testing Technology team with
+Google's specific requirements and constraints in mind. Whether you work on
+Linux, Windows, or a Mac, if you write C++ code, googletest can help you. And it
+supports *any* kind of tests, not just unit tests.
+
+So what makes a good test, and how does googletest fit in? We believe:
+
+1.  Tests should be *independent* and *repeatable*. It's a pain to debug a test
+    that succeeds or fails as a result of other tests. googletest isolates the
+    tests by running each of them on a different object. When a test fails,
+    googletest allows you to run it in isolation for quick debugging.
+2.  Tests should be well *organized* and reflect the structure of the tested
+    code. googletest groups related tests into test suites that can share data
+    and subroutines. This common pattern is easy to recognize and makes tests
+    easy to maintain. Such consistency is especially helpful when people switch
+    projects and start to work on a new code base.
+3.  Tests should be *portable* and *reusable*. Google has a lot of code that is
+    platform-neutral; its tests should also be platform-neutral. googletest
+    works on different OSes, with different compilers, with or without
+    exceptions, so googletest tests can work with a variety of configurations.
+4.  When tests fail, they should provide as much *information* about the problem
+    as possible. googletest doesn't stop at the first test failure. Instead, it
+    only stops the current test and continues with the next. You can also set up
+    tests that report non-fatal failures after which the current test continues.
+    Thus, you can detect and fix multiple bugs in a single run-edit-compile
+    cycle.
+5.  The testing framework should liberate test writers from housekeeping chores
+    and let them focus on the test *content*. googletest automatically keeps
+    track of all tests defined, and doesn't require the user to enumerate them
+    in order to run them.
+6.  Tests should be *fast*. With googletest, you can reuse shared resources
+    across tests and pay for the set-up/tear-down only once, without making
+    tests depend on each other.
+
+Since googletest is based on the popular xUnit architecture, you'll feel right
+at home if you've used JUnit or PyUnit before. If not, it will take you about 10
+minutes to learn the basics and get started. So let's go!
+
+## Beware of the nomenclature
+
+_Note:_ There might be some confusion arising from different definitions of the
+terms _Test_, _Test Case_ and _Test Suite_, so beware of misunderstanding these.
+
+Historically, googletest started to use the term _Test Case_ for grouping
+related tests, whereas current publications, including International Software
+Testing Qualifications Board ([ISTQB](http://www.istqb.org/)) materials and
+various textbooks on software quality, use the term
+_[Test Suite][istqb test suite]_ for this.
+
+The related term _Test_, as it is used in googletest, corresponds to the term
+_[Test Case][istqb test case]_ of ISTQB and others.
+
+The term _Test_ is commonly of broad enough sense, including ISTQB's definition
+of _Test Case_, so it's not much of a problem here. But the term _Test Case_ as
+was used in Google Test is of contradictory sense and thus confusing.
+
+googletest recently started replacing the term _Test Case_ with _Test Suite_.
+The preferred API is *TestSuite*. The older TestCase API is being slowly
+deprecated and refactored away.
+
+So please be aware of the different definitions of the terms:
+
+<!-- mdformat off(github rendering does not support multiline tables) -->
+
+Meaning                                                                              | googletest Term         | [ISTQB](http://www.istqb.org/) Term
+:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :---------------------- | :----------------------------------
+Exercise a particular program path with specific input values and verify the results | [TEST()](#simple-tests) | [Test Case][istqb test case]
+
+<!-- mdformat on -->
+
+[istqb test case]: http://glossary.istqb.org/en/search/test%20case
+[istqb test suite]: http://glossary.istqb.org/en/search/test%20suite
+
+## Basic Concepts
+
+When using googletest, you start by writing *assertions*, which are statements
+that check whether a condition is true. An assertion's result can be *success*,
+*nonfatal failure*, or *fatal failure*. If a fatal failure occurs, it aborts the
+current function; otherwise the program continues normally.
+
+*Tests* use assertions to verify the tested code's behavior. If a test crashes
+or has a failed assertion, then it *fails*; otherwise it *succeeds*.
+
+A *test suite* contains one or many tests. You should group your tests into test
+suites that reflect the structure of the tested code. When multiple tests in a
+test suite need to share common objects and subroutines, you can put them into a
+*test fixture* class.
+
+A *test program* can contain multiple test suites.
+
+We'll now explain how to write a test program, starting at the individual
+assertion level and building up to tests and test suites.
+
+## Assertions
+
+googletest assertions are macros that resemble function calls. You test a class
+or function by making assertions about its behavior. When an assertion fails,
+googletest prints the assertion's source file and line number location, along
+with a failure message. You may also supply a custom failure message which will
+be appended to googletest's message.
+
+The assertions come in pairs that test the same thing but have different effects
+on the current function. `ASSERT_*` versions generate fatal failures when they
+fail, and **abort the current function**. `EXPECT_*` versions generate nonfatal
+failures, which don't abort the current function. Usually `EXPECT_*` are
+preferred, as they allow more than one failure to be reported in a test.
+However, you should use `ASSERT_*` if it doesn't make sense to continue when the
+assertion in question fails.
+
+Since a failed `ASSERT_*` returns from the current function immediately,
+possibly skipping clean-up code that comes after it, it may cause a space leak.
+Depending on the nature of the leak, it may or may not be worth fixing - so keep
+this in mind if you get a heap checker error in addition to assertion errors.
+
+To provide a custom failure message, simply stream it into the macro using the
+`<<` operator or a sequence of such operators. An example:
+
+```c++
+ASSERT_EQ(x.size(), y.size()) << "Vectors x and y are of unequal length";
+
+for (int i = 0; i < x.size(); ++i) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(x[i], y[i]) << "Vectors x and y differ at index " << i;
+}
+```
+
+Anything that can be streamed to an `ostream` can be streamed to an assertion
+macro--in particular, C strings and `string` objects. If a wide string
+(`wchar_t*`, `TCHAR*` in `UNICODE` mode on Windows, or `std::wstring`) is
+streamed to an assertion, it will be translated to UTF-8 when printed.
+
+### Basic Assertions
+
+These assertions do basic true/false condition testing.
+
+Fatal assertion            | Nonfatal assertion         | Verifies
+-------------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------
+`ASSERT_TRUE(condition);`  | `EXPECT_TRUE(condition);`  | `condition` is true
+`ASSERT_FALSE(condition);` | `EXPECT_FALSE(condition);` | `condition` is false
+
+Remember, when they fail, `ASSERT_*` yields a fatal failure and returns from the
+current function, while `EXPECT_*` yields a nonfatal failure, allowing the
+function to continue running. In either case, an assertion failure means its
+containing test fails.
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+### Binary Comparison
+
+This section describes assertions that compare two values.
+
+Fatal assertion          | Nonfatal assertion       | Verifies
+------------------------ | ------------------------ | --------------
+`ASSERT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_EQ(val1, val2);` | `val1 == val2`
+`ASSERT_NE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_NE(val1, val2);` | `val1 != val2`
+`ASSERT_LT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LT(val1, val2);` | `val1 < val2`
+`ASSERT_LE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_LE(val1, val2);` | `val1 <= val2`
+`ASSERT_GT(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GT(val1, val2);` | `val1 > val2`
+`ASSERT_GE(val1, val2);` | `EXPECT_GE(val1, val2);` | `val1 >= val2`
+
+Value arguments must be comparable by the assertion's comparison operator or
+you'll get a compiler error. We used to require the arguments to support the
+`<<` operator for streaming to an `ostream`, but this is no longer necessary. If
+`<<` is supported, it will be called to print the arguments when the assertion
+fails; otherwise googletest will attempt to print them in the best way it can.
+For more details and how to customize the printing of the arguments, see the
+[documentation](../../googlemock/docs/cook_book.md#teaching-gmock-how-to-print-your-values).
+
+These assertions can work with a user-defined type, but only if you define the
+corresponding comparison operator (e.g., `==` or `<`). Since this is discouraged
+by the Google
+[C++ Style Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Operator_Overloading),
+you may need to use `ASSERT_TRUE()` or `EXPECT_TRUE()` to assert the equality of
+two objects of a user-defined type.
+
+However, when possible, `ASSERT_EQ(actual, expected)` is preferred to
+`ASSERT_TRUE(actual == expected)`, since it tells you `actual` and `expected`'s
+values on failure.
+
+Arguments are always evaluated exactly once. Therefore, it's OK for the
+arguments to have side effects. However, as with any ordinary C/C++ function,
+the arguments' evaluation order is undefined (i.e., the compiler is free to
+choose any order), and your code should not depend on any particular argument
+evaluation order.
+
+`ASSERT_EQ()` does pointer equality on pointers. If used on two C strings, it
+tests if they are in the same memory location, not if they have the same value.
+Therefore, if you want to compare C strings (e.g. `const char*`) by value, use
+`ASSERT_STREQ()`, which will be described later on. In particular, to assert
+that a C string is `NULL`, use `ASSERT_STREQ(c_string, NULL)`. Consider using
+`ASSERT_EQ(c_string, nullptr)` if c++11 is supported. To compare two `string`
+objects, you should use `ASSERT_EQ`.
+
+When doing pointer comparisons use `*_EQ(ptr, nullptr)` and `*_NE(ptr, nullptr)`
+instead of `*_EQ(ptr, NULL)` and `*_NE(ptr, NULL)`. This is because `nullptr` is
+typed, while `NULL` is not. See the [FAQ](faq.md) for more details.
+
+If you're working with floating point numbers, you may want to use the floating
+point variations of some of these macros in order to avoid problems caused by
+rounding. See [Advanced googletest Topics](advanced.md) for details.
+
+Macros in this section work with both narrow and wide string objects (`string`
+and `wstring`).
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+**Historical note**: Before February 2016 `*_EQ` had a convention of calling it
+as `ASSERT_EQ(expected, actual)`, so lots of existing code uses this order. Now
+`*_EQ` treats both parameters in the same way.
+
+### String Comparison
+
+The assertions in this group compare two **C strings**. If you want to compare
+two `string` objects, use `EXPECT_EQ`, `EXPECT_NE`, and etc instead.
+
+<!-- mdformat off(github rendering does not support multiline tables) -->
+
+| Fatal assertion                | Nonfatal assertion             | Verifies                                                 |
+| --------------------------     | ------------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `ASSERT_STREQ(str1,str2);`     | `EXPECT_STREQ(str1,str2);`     | the two C strings have the same content   		     |
+| `ASSERT_STRNE(str1,str2);`     | `EXPECT_STRNE(str1,str2);`     | the two C strings have different contents 		     |
+| `ASSERT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASEEQ(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have the same content, ignoring case   |
+| `ASSERT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | `EXPECT_STRCASENE(str1,str2);` | the two C strings have different contents, ignoring case |
+
+<!-- mdformat on-->
+
+Note that "CASE" in an assertion name means that case is ignored. A `NULL`
+pointer and an empty string are considered *different*.
+
+`*STREQ*` and `*STRNE*` also accept wide C strings (`wchar_t*`). If a comparison
+of two wide strings fails, their values will be printed as UTF-8 narrow strings.
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+**See also**: For more string comparison tricks (substring, prefix, suffix, and
+regular expression matching, for example), see [this](advanced.md) in the
+Advanced googletest Guide.
+
+## Simple Tests
+
+To create a test:
+
+1.  Use the `TEST()` macro to define and name a test function. These are
+    ordinary C++ functions that don't return a value.
+2.  In this function, along with any valid C++ statements you want to include,
+    use the various googletest assertions to check values.
+3.  The test's result is determined by the assertions; if any assertion in the
+    test fails (either fatally or non-fatally), or if the test crashes, the
+    entire test fails. Otherwise, it succeeds.
+
+```c++
+TEST(TestSuiteName, TestName) {
+  ... test body ...
+}
+```
+
+`TEST()` arguments go from general to specific. The *first* argument is the name
+of the test suite, and the *second* argument is the test's name within the test
+case. Both names must be valid C++ identifiers, and they should not contain
+any underscores (`_`). A test's *full name* consists of its containing test suite and
+its individual name. Tests from different test suites can have the same
+individual name.
+
+For example, let's take a simple integer function:
+
+```c++
+int Factorial(int n);  // Returns the factorial of n
+```
+
+A test suite for this function might look like:
+
+```c++
+// Tests factorial of 0.
+TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesZeroInput) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(0), 1);
+}
+
+// Tests factorial of positive numbers.
+TEST(FactorialTest, HandlesPositiveInput) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(1), 1);
+  EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(2), 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(3), 6);
+  EXPECT_EQ(Factorial(8), 40320);
+}
+```
+
+googletest groups the test results by test suites, so logically related tests
+should be in the same test suite; in other words, the first argument to their
+`TEST()` should be the same. In the above example, we have two tests,
+`HandlesZeroInput` and `HandlesPositiveInput`, that belong to the same test
+suite `FactorialTest`.
+
+When naming your test suites and tests, you should follow the same convention as
+for
+[naming functions and classes](https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html#Function_Names).
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+## Test Fixtures: Using the Same Data Configuration for Multiple Tests {#same-data-multiple-tests}
+
+If you find yourself writing two or more tests that operate on similar data, you
+can use a *test fixture*. This allows you to reuse the same configuration of
+objects for several different tests.
+
+To create a fixture:
+
+1.  Derive a class from `::testing::Test` . Start its body with `protected:`, as
+    we'll want to access fixture members from sub-classes.
+2.  Inside the class, declare any objects you plan to use.
+3.  If necessary, write a default constructor or `SetUp()` function to prepare
+    the objects for each test. A common mistake is to spell `SetUp()` as
+    **`Setup()`** with a small `u` - Use `override` in C++11 to make sure you
+    spelled it correctly.
+4.  If necessary, write a destructor or `TearDown()` function to release any
+    resources you allocated in `SetUp()` . To learn when you should use the
+    constructor/destructor and when you should use `SetUp()/TearDown()`, read
+    the [FAQ](faq.md#CtorVsSetUp).
+5.  If needed, define subroutines for your tests to share.
+
+When using a fixture, use `TEST_F()` instead of `TEST()` as it allows you to
+access objects and subroutines in the test fixture:
+
+```c++
+TEST_F(TestFixtureName, TestName) {
+  ... test body ...
+}
+```
+
+Like `TEST()`, the first argument is the test suite name, but for `TEST_F()`
+this must be the name of the test fixture class. You've probably guessed: `_F`
+is for fixture.
+
+Unfortunately, the C++ macro system does not allow us to create a single macro
+that can handle both types of tests. Using the wrong macro causes a compiler
+error.
+
+Also, you must first define a test fixture class before using it in a
+`TEST_F()`, or you'll get the compiler error "`virtual outside class
+declaration`".
+
+For each test defined with `TEST_F()`, googletest will create a *fresh* test
+fixture at runtime, immediately initialize it via `SetUp()`, run the test,
+clean up by calling `TearDown()`, and then delete the test fixture. Note that
+different tests in the same test suite have different test fixture objects, and
+googletest always deletes a test fixture before it creates the next one.
+googletest does **not** reuse the same test fixture for multiple tests. Any
+changes one test makes to the fixture do not affect other tests.
+
+As an example, let's write tests for a FIFO queue class named `Queue`, which has
+the following interface:
+
+```c++
+template <typename E>  // E is the element type.
+class Queue {
+ public:
+  Queue();
+  void Enqueue(const E& element);
+  E* Dequeue();  // Returns NULL if the queue is empty.
+  size_t size() const;
+  ...
+};
+```
+
+First, define a fixture class. By convention, you should give it the name
+`FooTest` where `Foo` is the class being tested.
+
+```c++
+class QueueTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  void SetUp() override {
+     q1_.Enqueue(1);
+     q2_.Enqueue(2);
+     q2_.Enqueue(3);
+  }
+
+  // void TearDown() override {}
+
+  Queue<int> q0_;
+  Queue<int> q1_;
+  Queue<int> q2_;
+};
+```
+
+In this case, `TearDown()` is not needed since we don't have to clean up after
+each test, other than what's already done by the destructor.
+
+Now we'll write tests using `TEST_F()` and this fixture.
+
+```c++
+TEST_F(QueueTest, IsEmptyInitially) {
+  EXPECT_EQ(q0_.size(), 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(QueueTest, DequeueWorks) {
+  int* n = q0_.Dequeue();
+  EXPECT_EQ(n, nullptr);
+
+  n = q1_.Dequeue();
+  ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr);
+  EXPECT_EQ(*n, 1);
+  EXPECT_EQ(q1_.size(), 0);
+  delete n;
+
+  n = q2_.Dequeue();
+  ASSERT_NE(n, nullptr);
+  EXPECT_EQ(*n, 2);
+  EXPECT_EQ(q2_.size(), 1);
+  delete n;
+}
+```
+
+The above uses both `ASSERT_*` and `EXPECT_*` assertions. The rule of thumb is
+to use `EXPECT_*` when you want the test to continue to reveal more errors after
+the assertion failure, and use `ASSERT_*` when continuing after failure doesn't
+make sense. For example, the second assertion in the `Dequeue` test is
+`ASSERT_NE(nullptr, n)`, as we need to dereference the pointer `n` later, which
+would lead to a segfault when `n` is `NULL`.
+
+When these tests run, the following happens:
+
+1.  googletest constructs a `QueueTest` object (let's call it `t1`).
+2.  `t1.SetUp()` initializes `t1`.
+3.  The first test (`IsEmptyInitially`) runs on `t1`.
+4.  `t1.TearDown()` cleans up after the test finishes.
+5.  `t1` is destructed.
+6.  The above steps are repeated on another `QueueTest` object, this time
+    running the `DequeueWorks` test.
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+## Invoking the Tests
+
+`TEST()` and `TEST_F()` implicitly register their tests with googletest. So,
+unlike with many other C++ testing frameworks, you don't have to re-list all
+your defined tests in order to run them.
+
+After defining your tests, you can run them with `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, which
+returns `0` if all the tests are successful, or `1` otherwise. Note that
+`RUN_ALL_TESTS()` runs *all tests* in your link unit--they can be from
+different test suites, or even different source files.
+
+When invoked, the `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` macro:
+
+*   Saves the state of all googletest flags.
+
+*   Creates a test fixture object for the first test.
+
+*   Initializes it via `SetUp()`.
+
+*   Runs the test on the fixture object.
+
+*   Cleans up the fixture via `TearDown()`.
+
+*   Deletes the fixture.
+
+*   Restores the state of all googletest flags.
+
+*   Repeats the above steps for the next test, until all tests have run.
+
+If a fatal failure happens the subsequent steps will be skipped.
+
+> IMPORTANT: You must **not** ignore the return value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or
+> you will get a compiler error. The rationale for this design is that the
+> automated testing service determines whether a test has passed based on its
+> exit code, not on its stdout/stderr output; thus your `main()` function must
+> return the value of `RUN_ALL_TESTS()`.
+>
+> Also, you should call `RUN_ALL_TESTS()` only **once**. Calling it more than
+> once conflicts with some advanced googletest features (e.g., thread-safe
+> [death tests](advanced.md#death-tests)) and thus is not supported.
+
+**Availability**: Linux, Windows, Mac.
+
+## Writing the main() Function
+
+Most users should _not_ need to write their own `main` function and instead link
+with `gtest_main` (as opposed to with `gtest`), which defines a suitable entry
+point. See the end of this section for details. The remainder of this section
+should only apply when you need to do something custom before the tests run that
+cannot be expressed within the framework of fixtures and test suites.
+
+If you write your own `main` function, it should return the value of
+`RUN_ALL_TESTS()`.
+
+You can start from this boilerplate:
+
+```c++
+#include "this/package/foo.h"
+
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+
+namespace my {
+namespace project {
+namespace {
+
+// The fixture for testing class Foo.
+class FooTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  // You can remove any or all of the following functions if their bodies would
+  // be empty.
+
+  FooTest() {
+     // You can do set-up work for each test here.
+  }
+
+  ~FooTest() override {
+     // You can do clean-up work that doesn't throw exceptions here.
+  }
+
+  // If the constructor and destructor are not enough for setting up
+  // and cleaning up each test, you can define the following methods:
+
+  void SetUp() override {
+     // Code here will be called immediately after the constructor (right
+     // before each test).
+  }
+
+  void TearDown() override {
+     // Code here will be called immediately after each test (right
+     // before the destructor).
+  }
+
+  // Class members declared here can be used by all tests in the test suite
+  // for Foo.
+};
+
+// Tests that the Foo::Bar() method does Abc.
+TEST_F(FooTest, MethodBarDoesAbc) {
+  const std::string input_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myinputfile.dat";
+  const std::string output_filepath = "this/package/testdata/myoutputfile.dat";
+  Foo f;
+  EXPECT_EQ(f.Bar(input_filepath, output_filepath), 0);
+}
+
+// Tests that Foo does Xyz.
+TEST_F(FooTest, DoesXyz) {
+  // Exercises the Xyz feature of Foo.
+}
+
+}  // namespace
+}  // namespace project
+}  // namespace my
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+  ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+  return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
+```
+
+The `::testing::InitGoogleTest()` function parses the command line for
+googletest flags, and removes all recognized flags. This allows the user to
+control a test program's behavior via various flags, which we'll cover in
+the [AdvancedGuide](advanced.md). You **must** call this function before calling
+`RUN_ALL_TESTS()`, or the flags won't be properly initialized.
+
+On Windows, `InitGoogleTest()` also works with wide strings, so it can be used
+in programs compiled in `UNICODE` mode as well.
+
+But maybe you think that writing all those `main` functions is too much work? We
+agree with you completely, and that's why Google Test provides a basic
+implementation of main(). If it fits your needs, then just link your test with
+the `gtest_main` library and you are good to go.
+
+NOTE: `ParseGUnitFlags()` is deprecated in favor of `InitGoogleTest()`.
+
+## Known Limitations
+
+*   Google Test is designed to be thread-safe. The implementation is thread-safe
+    on systems where the `pthreads` library is available. It is currently
+    _unsafe_ to use Google Test assertions from two threads concurrently on
+    other systems (e.g. Windows). In most tests this is not an issue as usually
+    the assertions are done in the main thread. If you want to help, you can
+    volunteer to implement the necessary synchronization primitives in
+    `gtest-port.h` for your platform.

package/cpp/leveldb/third_party/googletest/googletest/docs/samples.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Googletest Samples {#samples}
+
+If you're like us, you'd like to look at
+[googletest samples.](https://github.com/google/googletest/tree/master/googletest/samples)
+The sample directory has a number of well-commented samples showing how to use a
+variety of googletest features.
+
+*   Sample #1 shows the basic steps of using googletest to test C++ functions.
+*   Sample #2 shows a more complex unit test for a class with multiple member
+    functions.
+*   Sample #3 uses a test fixture.
+*   Sample #4 teaches you how to use googletest and `googletest.h` together to
+    get the best of both libraries.
+*   Sample #5 puts shared testing logic in a base test fixture, and reuses it in
+    derived fixtures.
+*   Sample #6 demonstrates type-parameterized tests.
+*   Sample #7 teaches the basics of value-parameterized tests.
+*   Sample #8 shows using `Combine()` in value-parameterized tests.
+*   Sample #9 shows use of the listener API to modify Google Test's console
+    output and the use of its reflection API to inspect test results.
+*   Sample #10 shows use of the listener API to implement a primitive memory
+    leak checker.