mumucc 0.4.4 → 0.4.10

package/defaults/plugin-seed/marketplaces/claude-code-workflows/plugins/agent-orchestration/commands/improve-agent.md

@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+# Agent Performance Optimization Workflow
+
+Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
+
+[Extended thinking: Agent optimization requires a data-driven approach combining performance metrics, user feedback analysis, and advanced prompt engineering techniques. Success depends on systematic evaluation, targeted improvements, and rigorous testing with rollback capabilities for production safety.]
+
+## Phase 1: Performance Analysis and Baseline Metrics
+
+Comprehensive analysis of agent performance using context-manager for historical data collection.
+
+### 1.1 Gather Performance Data
+
+```
+Use: context-manager
+Command: analyze-agent-performance $ARGUMENTS --days 30
+```
+
+Collect metrics including:
+
+- Task completion rate (successful vs failed tasks)
+- Response accuracy and factual correctness
+- Tool usage efficiency (correct tools, call frequency)
+- Average response time and token consumption
+- User satisfaction indicators (corrections, retries)
+- Hallucination incidents and error patterns
+
+### 1.2 User Feedback Pattern Analysis
+
+Identify recurring patterns in user interactions:
+
+- **Correction patterns**: Where users consistently modify outputs
+- **Clarification requests**: Common areas of ambiguity
+- **Task abandonment**: Points where users give up
+- **Follow-up questions**: Indicators of incomplete responses
+- **Positive feedback**: Successful patterns to preserve
+
+### 1.3 Failure Mode Classification
+
+Categorize failures by root cause:
+
+- **Instruction misunderstanding**: Role or task confusion
+- **Output format errors**: Structure or formatting issues
+- **Context loss**: Long conversation degradation
+- **Tool misuse**: Incorrect or inefficient tool selection
+- **Constraint violations**: Safety or business rule breaches
+- **Edge case handling**: Unusual input scenarios
+
+### 1.4 Baseline Performance Report
+
+Generate quantitative baseline metrics:
+
+```
+Performance Baseline:
+- Task Success Rate: [X%]
+- Average Corrections per Task: [Y]
+- Tool Call Efficiency: [Z%]
+- User Satisfaction Score: [1-10]
+- Average Response Latency: [Xms]
+- Token Efficiency Ratio: [X:Y]
+```
+
+## Phase 2: Prompt Engineering Improvements
+
+Apply advanced prompt optimization techniques using prompt-engineer agent.
+
+### 2.1 Chain-of-Thought Enhancement
+
+Implement structured reasoning patterns:
+
+```
+Use: prompt-engineer
+Technique: chain-of-thought-optimization
+```
+
+- Add explicit reasoning steps: "Let's approach this step-by-step..."
+- Include self-verification checkpoints: "Before proceeding, verify that..."
+- Implement recursive decomposition for complex tasks
+- Add reasoning trace visibility for debugging
+
+### 2.2 Few-Shot Example Optimization
+
+Curate high-quality examples from successful interactions:
+
+- **Select diverse examples** covering common use cases
+- **Include edge cases** that previously failed
+- **Show both positive and negative examples** with explanations
+- **Order examples** from simple to complex
+- **Annotate examples** with key decision points
+
+Example structure:
+
+```
+Good Example:
+Input: [User request]
+Reasoning: [Step-by-step thought process]
+Output: [Successful response]
+Why this works: [Key success factors]
+
+Bad Example:
+Input: [Similar request]
+Output: [Failed response]
+Why this fails: [Specific issues]
+Correct approach: [Fixed version]
+```
+
+### 2.3 Role Definition Refinement
+
+Strengthen agent identity and capabilities:
+
+- **Core purpose**: Clear, single-sentence mission
+- **Expertise domains**: Specific knowledge areas
+- **Behavioral traits**: Personality and interaction style
+- **Tool proficiency**: Available tools and when to use them
+- **Constraints**: What the agent should NOT do
+- **Success criteria**: How to measure task completion
+
+### 2.4 Constitutional AI Integration
+
+Implement self-correction mechanisms:
+
+```
+Constitutional Principles:
+1. Verify factual accuracy before responding
+2. Self-check for potential biases or harmful content
+3. Validate output format matches requirements
+4. Ensure response completeness
+5. Maintain consistency with previous responses
+```
+
+Add critique-and-revise loops:
+
+- Initial response generation
+- Self-critique against principles
+- Automatic revision if issues detected
+- Final validation before output
+
+### 2.5 Output Format Tuning
+
+Optimize response structure:
+
+- **Structured templates** for common tasks
+- **Dynamic formatting** based on complexity
+- **Progressive disclosure** for detailed information
+- **Markdown optimization** for readability
+- **Code block formatting** with syntax highlighting
+- **Table and list generation** for data presentation
+
+## Phase 3: Testing and Validation
+
+Comprehensive testing framework with A/B comparison.
+
+### 3.1 Test Suite Development
+
+Create representative test scenarios:
+
+```
+Test Categories:
+1. Golden path scenarios (common successful cases)
+2. Previously failed tasks (regression testing)
+3. Edge cases and corner scenarios
+4. Stress tests (complex, multi-step tasks)
+5. Adversarial inputs (potential breaking points)
+6. Cross-domain tasks (combining capabilities)
+```
+
+### 3.2 A/B Testing Framework
+
+Compare original vs improved agent:
+
+```
+Use: parallel-test-runner
+Config:
+  - Agent A: Original version
+  - Agent B: Improved version
+  - Test set: 100 representative tasks
+  - Metrics: Success rate, speed, token usage
+  - Evaluation: Blind human review + automated scoring
+```
+
+Statistical significance testing:
+
+- Minimum sample size: 100 tasks per variant
+- Confidence level: 95% (p < 0.05)
+- Effect size calculation (Cohen's d)
+- Power analysis for future tests
+
+### 3.3 Evaluation Metrics
+
+Comprehensive scoring framework:
+
+**Task-Level Metrics:**
+
+- Completion rate (binary success/failure)
+- Correctness score (0-100% accuracy)
+- Efficiency score (steps taken vs optimal)
+- Tool usage appropriateness
+- Response relevance and completeness
+
+**Quality Metrics:**
+
+- Hallucination rate (factual errors per response)
+- Consistency score (alignment with previous responses)
+- Format compliance (matches specified structure)
+- Safety score (constraint adherence)
+- User satisfaction prediction
+
+**Performance Metrics:**
+
+- Response latency (time to first token)
+- Total generation time
+- Token consumption (input + output)
+- Cost per task (API usage fees)
+- Memory/context efficiency
+
+### 3.4 Human Evaluation Protocol
+
+Structured human review process:
+
+- Blind evaluation (evaluators don't know version)
+- Standardized rubric with clear criteria
+- Multiple evaluators per sample (inter-rater reliability)
+- Qualitative feedback collection
+- Preference ranking (A vs B comparison)
+
+## Phase 4: Version Control and Deployment
+
+Safe rollout with monitoring and rollback capabilities.
+
+### 4.1 Version Management
+
+Systematic versioning strategy:
+
+```
+Version Format: agent-name-v[MAJOR].[MINOR].[PATCH]
+Example: customer-support-v2.3.1
+
+MAJOR: Significant capability changes
+MINOR: Prompt improvements, new examples
+PATCH: Bug fixes, minor adjustments
+```
+
+Maintain version history:
+
+- Git-based prompt storage
+- Changelog with improvement details
+- Performance metrics per version
+- Rollback procedures documented
+
+### 4.2 Staged Rollout
+
+Progressive deployment strategy:
+
+1. **Alpha testing**: Internal team validation (5% traffic)
+2. **Beta testing**: Selected users (20% traffic)
+3. **Canary release**: Gradual increase (20% → 50% → 100%)
+4. **Full deployment**: After success criteria met
+5. **Monitoring period**: 7-day observation window
+
+### 4.3 Rollback Procedures
+
+Quick recovery mechanism:
+
+```
+Rollback Triggers:
+- Success rate drops >10% from baseline
+- Critical errors increase >5%
+- User complaints spike
+- Cost per task increases >20%
+- Safety violations detected
+
+Rollback Process:
+1. Detect issue via monitoring
+2. Alert team immediately
+3. Switch to previous stable version
+4. Analyze root cause
+5. Fix and re-test before retry
+```
+
+### 4.4 Continuous Monitoring
+
+Real-time performance tracking:
+
+- Dashboard with key metrics
+- Anomaly detection alerts
+- User feedback collection
+- Automated regression testing
+- Weekly performance reports
+
+## Success Criteria
+
+Agent improvement is successful when:
+
+- Task success rate improves by ≥15%
+- User corrections decrease by ≥25%
+- No increase in safety violations
+- Response time remains within 10% of baseline
+- Cost per task doesn't increase >5%
+- Positive user feedback increases
+
+## Post-Deployment Review
+
+After 30 days of production use:
+
+1. Analyze accumulated performance data
+2. Compare against baseline and targets
+3. Identify new improvement opportunities
+4. Document lessons learned
+5. Plan next optimization cycle
+
+## Continuous Improvement Cycle
+
+Establish regular improvement cadence:
+
+- **Weekly**: Monitor metrics and collect feedback
+- **Monthly**: Analyze patterns and plan improvements
+- **Quarterly**: Major version updates with new capabilities
+- **Annually**: Strategic review and architecture updates
+
+Remember: Agent optimization is an iterative process. Each cycle builds upon previous learnings, gradually improving performance while maintaining stability and safety.

package/defaults/plugin-seed/marketplaces/claude-code-workflows/plugins/agent-orchestration/commands/multi-agent-optimize.md

@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+# Multi-Agent Optimization Toolkit
+
+## Role: AI-Powered Multi-Agent Performance Engineering Specialist
+
+### Context
+
+The Multi-Agent Optimization Tool is an advanced AI-driven framework designed to holistically improve system performance through intelligent, coordinated agent-based optimization. Leveraging cutting-edge AI orchestration techniques, this tool provides a comprehensive approach to performance engineering across multiple domains.
+
+### Core Capabilities
+
+- Intelligent multi-agent coordination
+- Performance profiling and bottleneck identification
+- Adaptive optimization strategies
+- Cross-domain performance optimization
+- Cost and efficiency tracking
+
+## Arguments Handling
+
+The tool processes optimization arguments with flexible input parameters:
+
+- `$TARGET`: Primary system/application to optimize
+- `$PERFORMANCE_GOALS`: Specific performance metrics and objectives
+- `$OPTIMIZATION_SCOPE`: Depth of optimization (quick-win, comprehensive)
+- `$BUDGET_CONSTRAINTS`: Cost and resource limitations
+- `$QUALITY_METRICS`: Performance quality thresholds
+
+## 1. Multi-Agent Performance Profiling
+
+### Profiling Strategy
+
+- Distributed performance monitoring across system layers
+- Real-time metrics collection and analysis
+- Continuous performance signature tracking
+
+#### Profiling Agents
+
+1. **Database Performance Agent**
+   - Query execution time analysis
+   - Index utilization tracking
+   - Resource consumption monitoring
+
+2. **Application Performance Agent**
+   - CPU and memory profiling
+   - Algorithmic complexity assessment
+   - Concurrency and async operation analysis
+
+3. **Frontend Performance Agent**
+   - Rendering performance metrics
+   - Network request optimization
+   - Core Web Vitals monitoring
+
+### Profiling Code Example
+
+```python
+def multi_agent_profiler(target_system):
+    agents = [
+        DatabasePerformanceAgent(target_system),
+        ApplicationPerformanceAgent(target_system),
+        FrontendPerformanceAgent(target_system)
+    ]
+
+    performance_profile = {}
+    for agent in agents:
+        performance_profile[agent.__class__.__name__] = agent.profile()
+
+    return aggregate_performance_metrics(performance_profile)
+```
+
+## 2. Context Window Optimization
+
+### Optimization Techniques
+
+- Intelligent context compression
+- Semantic relevance filtering
+- Dynamic context window resizing
+- Token budget management
+
+### Context Compression Algorithm
+
+```python
+def compress_context(context, max_tokens=4000):
+    # Semantic compression using embedding-based truncation
+    compressed_context = semantic_truncate(
+        context,
+        max_tokens=max_tokens,
+        importance_threshold=0.7
+    )
+    return compressed_context
+```
+
+## 3. Agent Coordination Efficiency
+
+### Coordination Principles
+
+- Parallel execution design
+- Minimal inter-agent communication overhead
+- Dynamic workload distribution
+- Fault-tolerant agent interactions
+
+### Orchestration Framework
+
+```python
+class MultiAgentOrchestrator:
+    def __init__(self, agents):
+        self.agents = agents
+        self.execution_queue = PriorityQueue()
+        self.performance_tracker = PerformanceTracker()
+
+    def optimize(self, target_system):
+        # Parallel agent execution with coordinated optimization
+        with concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor() as executor:
+            futures = {
+                executor.submit(agent.optimize, target_system): agent
+                for agent in self.agents
+            }
+
+            for future in concurrent.futures.as_completed(futures):
+                agent = futures[future]
+                result = future.result()
+                self.performance_tracker.log(agent, result)
+```
+
+## 4. Parallel Execution Optimization
+
+### Key Strategies
+
+- Asynchronous agent processing
+- Workload partitioning
+- Dynamic resource allocation
+- Minimal blocking operations
+
+## 5. Cost Optimization Strategies
+
+### LLM Cost Management
+
+- Token usage tracking
+- Adaptive model selection
+- Caching and result reuse
+- Efficient prompt engineering
+
+### Cost Tracking Example
+
+```python
+class CostOptimizer:
+    def __init__(self):
+        self.token_budget = 100000  # Monthly budget
+        self.token_usage = 0
+        self.model_costs = {
+            'gpt-5.2': 0.03,
+            'claude-4-sonnet': 0.015,
+            'claude-4-haiku': 0.0025
+        }
+
+    def select_optimal_model(self, complexity):
+        # Dynamic model selection based on task complexity and budget
+        pass
+```
+
+## 6. Latency Reduction Techniques
+
+### Performance Acceleration
+
+- Predictive caching
+- Pre-warming agent contexts
+- Intelligent result memoization
+- Reduced round-trip communication
+
+## 7. Quality vs Speed Tradeoffs
+
+### Optimization Spectrum
+
+- Performance thresholds
+- Acceptable degradation margins
+- Quality-aware optimization
+- Intelligent compromise selection
+
+## 8. Monitoring and Continuous Improvement
+
+### Observability Framework
+
+- Real-time performance dashboards
+- Automated optimization feedback loops
+- Machine learning-driven improvement
+- Adaptive optimization strategies
+
+## Reference Workflows
+
+### Workflow 1: E-Commerce Platform Optimization
+
+1. Initial performance profiling
+2. Agent-based optimization
+3. Cost and performance tracking
+4. Continuous improvement cycle
+
+### Workflow 2: Enterprise API Performance Enhancement
+
+1. Comprehensive system analysis
+2. Multi-layered agent optimization
+3. Iterative performance refinement
+4. Cost-efficient scaling strategy
+
+## Key Considerations
+
+- Always measure before and after optimization
+- Maintain system stability during optimization
+- Balance performance gains with resource consumption
+- Implement gradual, reversible changes
+
+Target Optimization: $ARGUMENTS

package/defaults/plugin-seed/marketplaces/claude-code-workflows/plugins/agent-teams/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+{
+  "name": "agent-teams",
+  "version": "1.0.2",
+  "description": "Orchestrate multi-agent teams for parallel code review, hypothesis-driven debugging, and coordinated feature development using Claude Code's Agent Teams",
+  "author": {
+    "name": "Seth Hobson",
+    "email": "seth@major7apps.com"
+  },
+  "license": "MIT"
+}

package/defaults/plugin-seed/marketplaces/claude-code-workflows/plugins/agent-teams/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+# Agent Teams Plugin
+
+Orchestrate multi-agent teams for parallel code review, hypothesis-driven debugging, and coordinated feature development using Claude Code's experimental [Agent Teams](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams) feature.
+
+## Setup
+
+### Prerequisites
+
+1. Enable the experimental Agent Teams feature:
+
+```bash
+export CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1
+```
+
+2. Configure teammate display mode in your `~/.claude/settings.json`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "teammateMode": "tmux"
+}
+```
+
+Available display modes:
+
+- `"tmux"` — Each teammate runs in a tmux pane (recommended)
+- `"iterm2"` — Each teammate gets an iTerm2 tab (macOS only)
+- `"in-process"` — Teammates run in the same process (default)
+
+### Installation
+
+First, add the marketplace (if you haven't already):
+
+```
+/plugin marketplace add wshobson/agents
+```
+
+Then install the plugin:
+
+```
+/plugin install agent-teams@claude-code-workflows
+```
+
+## Features
+
+- **Preset Teams** — Spawn pre-configured teams for common workflows (review, debug, feature, fullstack, research, security, migration)
+- **Multi-Reviewer Code Review** — Parallel review across security, performance, architecture, testing, and accessibility dimensions
+- **Hypothesis-Driven Debugging** — Competing hypothesis investigation with evidence-based root cause analysis
+- **Parallel Feature Development** — Coordinated multi-agent implementation with file ownership boundaries
+- **Parallel Research** — Multiple Explore agents investigating different questions or codebase areas simultaneously
+- **Security Audit** — Comprehensive parallel security review across OWASP, auth, dependencies, and configuration
+- **Migration Support** — Coordinated codebase migration with parallel implementation streams and correctness verification
+- **Task Coordination** — Dependency-aware task management with workload balancing
+- **Team Communication** — Structured messaging protocols for efficient agent collaboration
+
+## Commands
+
+| Command          | Description                                                |
+| ---------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
+| `/team-spawn`    | Spawn a team using presets or custom composition           |
+| `/team-status`   | Display team members, tasks, and progress                  |
+| `/team-shutdown` | Gracefully shut down a team and clean up resources         |
+| `/team-review`   | Multi-reviewer parallel code review                        |
+| `/team-debug`    | Competing hypotheses debugging with parallel investigation |
+| `/team-feature`  | Parallel feature development with file ownership           |
+| `/team-delegate` | Task delegation dashboard and workload management          |
+
+## Agents
+
+| Agent              | Role                                                                              | Color  |
+| ------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------ |
+| `team-lead`        | Team orchestrator — decomposes work, manages lifecycle, synthesizes results       | Blue   |
+| `team-reviewer`    | Multi-dimensional code reviewer — operates on assigned review dimension           | Green  |
+| `team-debugger`    | Hypothesis investigator — gathers evidence to confirm/falsify assigned hypothesis | Red    |
+| `team-implementer` | Parallel builder — implements within strict file ownership boundaries             | Yellow |
+
+## Skills
+
+| Skill                          | Description                                                              |
+| ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| `team-composition-patterns`    | Team sizing heuristics, preset compositions, agent type selection        |
+| `task-coordination-strategies` | Task decomposition, dependency graphs, workload monitoring               |
+| `parallel-debugging`           | Hypothesis generation, evidence collection, result arbitration           |
+| `multi-reviewer-patterns`      | Review dimension allocation, finding deduplication, severity calibration |
+| `parallel-feature-development` | File ownership strategies, conflict avoidance, integration patterns      |
+| `team-communication-protocols` | Message type selection, plan approval workflow, shutdown protocol        |
+
+## Quick Start
+
+### Multi-Reviewer Code Review
+
+```
+/team-review src/ --reviewers security,performance,architecture
+```
+
+Spawns 3 reviewers, each analyzing the codebase from their assigned dimension, then consolidates findings into a prioritized report.
+
+### Hypothesis-Driven Debugging
+
+```
+/team-debug "API returns 500 on POST /users with valid payload" --hypotheses 3
+```
+
+Generates 3 competing hypotheses, spawns investigators for each, collects evidence, and presents the most likely root cause with a fix.
+
+### Parallel Feature Development
+
+```
+/team-feature "Add user authentication with OAuth2" --team-size 3 --plan-first
+```
+
+Decomposes the feature into work streams with file ownership boundaries, gets your approval, then spawns implementers to build in parallel.
+
+### Parallel Research
+
+```
+/team-spawn research --name codebase-research
+```
+
+Spawns 3 researchers to investigate different aspects in parallel — across your codebase (Grep/Read) and the web (WebSearch/WebFetch). Each reports findings with citations.
+
+### Security Audit
+
+```
+/team-spawn security
+```
+
+Spawns 4 security reviewers covering OWASP vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependency supply chain, and secrets/configuration. Produces a consolidated security report.
+
+### Codebase Migration
+
+```
+/team-spawn migration --name react-hooks-migration
+```
+
+Spawns a lead to plan the migration, 2 implementers to migrate code in parallel streams, and a reviewer to verify correctness of the migrated code.
+
+### Custom Team
+
+```
+/team-spawn custom --name my-team --members 4
+```
+
+Interactively configure team composition with custom roles and agent types.
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Start with presets** — Use `/team-spawn review`, `/team-spawn debug`, or `/team-spawn feature` before building custom teams
+2. **Use `--plan-first`** — For feature development, always review the decomposition before spawning implementers
+3. **File ownership is critical** — Never assign the same file to multiple implementers; use interface contracts at boundaries
+4. **Monitor with `/team-status`** — Check progress regularly and use `/team-delegate --rebalance` if work is uneven
+5. **Graceful shutdown** — Always use `/team-shutdown` rather than killing processes manually
+6. **Keep teams small** — 2-4 teammates is optimal; larger teams increase coordination overhead
+7. **Use Shift+Tab** — Claude Code's built-in delegate mode (Shift+Tab) complements these commands for ad-hoc delegation