luckiest-co 1.0.1 → 1.0.3

package/skills/luckiest-marketing-plan/references/budget-planning.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+# Budget Planning — Scientific Methods for Setting the Marketing Budget
+
+The problem with most SaaS marketing budgets is that they're pulled out of thin air — a number that hopefully doesn't constrain growth too much, but doesn't anchor in customer-acquisition economics either. The result: when someone asks "why this number?" there's no answer.
+
+Two scientific methods solve this. Use one (not both) in Section 8 (Revenue) and Section 10 (12-month outlook) of every plan.
+
+Excerpted and adapted from *Founding Marketing* by Corey Haines.
+
+## Method 1 — Revenue-Based (5–40% of annual revenue)
+
+**Direction:** budget → revenue goal.
+
+You start with what the company can comfortably spend on marketing, then forecast what revenue that spend can plausibly generate.
+
+### The ranges
+
+| Posture | % of ARR | When to use |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Conservative (profit-preserving)** | 5% | Established business focused on profit distribution; bootstrapped; founder-paid customer base |
+| **Standard growth** | 15–25% | Most healthy SaaS in the seed-to-Series-A range |
+| **Aggressive growth (deploying raised capital)** | up to 40% | Recently funded round, mandate to deploy fast, board accepts burn |
+
+For reference: public SaaS companies routinely report sales-and-marketing spend between 20% and 55% of revenue (Zoom historically ran between 20% and 55% across years).
+
+### The math (Conservative example)
+
+Business at $1M ARR, 5% allocation:
+
+- Annual marketing budget: **$50,000**
+- Blended CAC: $100 → can acquire **500 new customers**
+- ARPC: $50/mo → adds **$300K** to ARR
+- Account for 15% annual churn → 85% × $300K = **+$255K net new ARR**
+- End-of-year goal: **$1.255M ARR**
+
+### The math (Aggressive example)
+
+Business at $1M ARR, 40% allocation:
+
+- Annual marketing budget: **$400,000**
+- Blended CAC: $100 → can acquire **4,000 new customers**
+- ARPC: $50/mo → adds **$2.4M** to ARR
+- End-of-year goal: **$3.4M ARR**
+
+### Two keys to making this method work
+
+1. **Know your blended CAC** (see "Calculating CAC" below)
+2. **Match the allocation percentage to your actual ambition.** A founder running 5% allocation while telling the board they expect to triple revenue is showing two incompatible signals.
+
+## Method 2 — Goal-Based (reverse-engineered from the revenue target)
+
+**Direction:** revenue goal → budget.
+
+You start with the revenue goal and work backward through the unit economics to derive the budget required to hit it. Best for:
+
+- Companies just starting up (no historical CAC baseline yet, working from first principles)
+- Companies anticipating outside capital (need to defend the ask)
+- Companies using revenue-based financing (Pipe, Capchase, Founderpath)
+
+### The formula
+
+```
+Marketing budget = [(New ARR / (ARPC × 12)) × CAC] / annual retention rate
+```
+
+### Worked example: $1M ARR → $2M ARR
+
+Step 1 — How much new ARR per customer?
+ARPC × 12 = $50 × 12 = **$600 ARR per new customer**
+
+Step 2 — How many new customers do we need?
+$1,000,000 / $600 = **1,667 new customers**
+
+Step 3 — What's the raw acquisition cost?
+1,667 × $100 CAC = **$166,700**
+
+Step 4 — Account for churn (15% annual = 85% retention)
+$166,700 / 0.85 = **$196,118** (round to **$200K**)
+
+When someone asks how you got to the budget, walk them through the four steps. It's defensible.
+
+### Why this formula and not something simpler
+
+The four steps each correspond to a real economic reality:
+- Step 1 converts MRR-language into the ARR-language a board talks in
+- Step 2 names the customer count, which is what the funnel actually has to deliver
+- Step 3 anchors the budget in the cost of acquisition
+- Step 4 acknowledges that churned customers don't count toward net new ARR, so the budget needs to cover the gap
+
+### Required buffer
+
+**Always add 10–20% as "experimental budget"** on top of the formula output. CAC is the main dependency; if CAC comes in 50% higher than estimated, the cascading effect is missing the revenue goal. It is much cheaper to overestimate CAC than to underestimate it.
+
+The experimental budget also funds the experiments that find your next channel before your current one plateaus (see `growth-patterns.md` — channel S-curves).
+
+## The VC growth path (3-3-2-2-2 rule)
+
+Once a company has crossed $1M ARR and taken a Series A, the implicit benchmark VCs expect is:
+
+| Year | ARR multiple | Cumulative ARR (from $1M start) |
+|---|---|---|
+| Year 0 | — | $1M |
+| Year +1 | 3× | $3M |
+| Year +2 | 3× | $9M |
+| Year +3 | 2× | $18M |
+| Year +4 | 2× | $36M |
+| Year +5 | 2× | $72M |
+| Year +6 | 2× | $144M |
+| Year +7 | 2× | $288M |
+
+That's the 3-3-2-2-2 rule. Useful when:
+
+- The plan needs to map 12-month and 36-month milestones to VC expectations
+- The founder is mid-raise and the board needs to see a plausible path to the next round
+- Section 10 (12-month outlook) needs anchoring against an industry benchmark, not just internal ambition
+
+Most companies miss it. That's fine. Knowing the benchmark gives the team a defensible reason to either match it or explicitly choose not to.
+
+## Calculating CAC (blended, not paid-only)
+
+If there's no historical CAC, use a baseline: **one year of revenue from the smallest paid plan.** Deploy the budget, capture actual CAC data, replace the baseline with the measured number for the next planning cycle.
+
+For an established CAC calculation, **CAC must be blended.** Include:
+
+- Marketing salaries (full loaded cost, not just base)
+- Advertising spend
+- Marketing tech stack costs
+- Content production costs (writers, designers, video editors)
+- Agency / contractor retainers
+- SDR / BDR salaries if doing outbound
+- Tools (CRM, marketing automation, analytics)
+
+Then divide by the number of new customers acquired in the period. That blended number is the one to use in either budgeting method.
+
+The mistake to avoid: calculating CAC from paid ad spend alone. A company that "doesn't run ads" still has a CAC — it's just hidden in the content team, the founder's time, the SEO contractor, the conference booth.
+
+## The reality check on forecasting
+
+This whole framework derives a budget and a revenue goal — not a 12-month month-by-month forecast accurate to the dollar.
+
+**Unless the company is publicly traded, all forecasts are educated guesses.** No startup under $100M ARR reliably hits forecasts to the month. The honest framing for the plan:
+
+- The annual goal is a defensible direction-of-travel
+- The budget is the resource commitment that makes the goal plausible
+- The 90-day roadmap (Section 9) is what's actionable now
+- Month-to-month variance is expected; quarterly review is when the plan adjusts
+
+What's actionable: how to deploy the budget, what concrete moves to execute, what to adjust when real data comes in.
+
+What's not actionable: trying to forecast traffic, pipeline, retention curves, conversion rates, and channel mix all down to the decimal point and expecting that forecast to hold. Founders who over-engineer the forecast tend to spend the plan period explaining variance instead of executing.
+
+**Rule for the plan:** the budget number is honest. The annual goal is honest. The month-by-month projection is illustrative.
+
+## How this flows into the plan
+
+| Section | What to include |
+|---|---|
+| **3 (Current state)** | Current monthly marketing spend broken down by line (paid, tools, content, headcount, retainers). Compute current %-of-ARR allocation. |
+| **8 (Revenue)** | The unit-economics table (CAC, ARPC, churn) that feeds whichever budget method you're using. |
+| **10 (12-month outlook)** | Apply Method 1 or Method 2 to derive the 12-month budget and the resulting revenue goal. Anchor against the 3-3-2-2-2 rule if Series A+ and VC-backed. |
+| **11 (Ops stack)** | Show the budget allocation across the AARRR stages — what % to Acquisition, Activation, etc. The ops-stack mapping informs which line items grow when the next funding tier unlocks. |
+| **13 (Open decisions)** | If CAC is unknown or contested, flag it as the highest-impact open decision — every other number depends on it. |
+
+## When to choose which method
+
+- **Method 1 (Revenue-Based)** when the company has historical CAC data, a profit/burn posture, and the question is "given our posture, what's a plausible goal."
+- **Method 2 (Goal-Based)** when the company has a specific goal (board mandate, VC milestone, fundraise target) and the question is "what budget do we need to hit it."
+
+For most plans in the seed-to-Series-A range, Method 2 is more useful — it forces the conversation about whether the goal is funded.

package/skills/luckiest-marketing-plan/references/client-types.md

@@ -0,0 +1,373 @@
+# Client Types — Variations by Business Model
+
+The 13-section plan structure stays consistent across client types. What changes is the **content emphasis** within each section. This doc names the dominant patterns by client archetype.
+
+## Archetype 1 — B2B SaaS
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Subscription revenue
+- Often higher ACV ($1K–$100K+ per year)
+- Sales-assisted or self-serve depending on tier
+- Buyer often different from user (champion vs. end-user)
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition heavy:**
+- SEO is the dominant top-of-funnel motion (people search for solutions)
+- Content marketing (blog, knowledge base, comparison pages) drives MQLs
+- LinkedIn for both organic founder presence and paid
+- Outbound (cold email + LinkedIn) often complements inbound
+- Events (conferences, webinars) for high-ACV products
+
+**Activation:**
+- Signup → trial → first key action (PLG products)
+- Trial → demo → POC (sales-led products)
+- Empty states matter — guide users to first value action
+
+**Retention:**
+- Product engagement metrics (DAU, feature adoption)
+- Customer success motion (CSM team for higher ACV)
+- Lifecycle emails focused on feature discovery, value moments
+
+**Referral:**
+- Customer advocacy programs
+- Partner / integration co-marketing
+- G2 / Capterra reviews
+- Champion-to-buyer expansion
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Expansion / NRR is often the biggest growth lever
+- Tier upgrades, seat expansion, usage-based add-ons
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `cold-email`, `programmatic-seo`, `competitors`, `seo-audit`, `ai-seo`
+- `ads` weighted toward LinkedIn + Google
+- `emails` for trial nurture + lifecycle
+- `pricing` for tier optimization
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- SEO + content > everything else
+- Founder-led LinkedIn channel
+- Customer.io / Mailchimp for nurture
+- HARO + investor backchannel for PR
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 2 — D2C Consumer App (Subscription)
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Lower ACV ($5–$30/mo typically)
+- High volume, lower margin per user
+- App Store / Play Store as the primary acquisition surface
+- Lifecycle email + push for retention
+- Often paid-acquisition-driven once budget unlocks
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- App Store Optimization (ASO) is the highest-leverage non-site asset
+- Paid social (Meta, TikTok) often dominant once budget exists
+- Apple Search Ads for high-intent App Store traffic
+- Influencer + content creators
+- PR + endorsements
+
+**Activation:**
+- Onboarding is the dominant activation surface
+- Time-to-value must be minutes, not hours
+- Paywall structure + trial length critical
+
+**Retention:**
+- Lifecycle email + push
+- In-app reminders (carefully — overuse = churn)
+- Subscription preference center
+- Win-back campaigns
+
+**Referral:**
+- Built-in sharing (share-a-month flow)
+- Two-sided referrals
+- Influencer / creator ambassadors
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Annual plan default is the biggest single move (compresses MRR but improves LTV)
+- Tier optimization (Free → Premium → Premium+)
+- In-app upsells
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `onboarding`, `paywalls`, `emails`
+- `ads`, `ad-creative` (heavy creative iteration)
+- `referrals`
+- `pricing` for annual default + tier consolidation
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- ASO first (highest organic leverage)
+- Onboarding rebuild
+- Lifecycle email shipping
+- Founder-led social if founder is on-camera
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 3 — Hybrid Hardware + Software
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Physical product + software companion (e.g., Quietude's eye mask + app)
+- Hardware as a distribution wedge (lower price, easier first purchase)
+- Software as the LTV (recurring revenue)
+- Blended CAC across both surfaces
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- Shopify storefront SEO (hardware product pages target consumer search)
+- Amazon listing (high-discovery, takes margin)
+- PR amplification (hardware is photogenic — high-profile influencer endorsements move volume)
+- Paid social for hardware (Meta + Instagram, eye-catching creative)
+
+**Activation:**
+- Two activations to track: hardware unboxing experience + software signup
+- Hardware → software activation flow is the bridge
+- Concierge setup for high-value hardware buyers
+
+**Retention:**
+- Hardware post-purchase lifecycle (different from app onboarding)
+- Software companion drives stickiness
+- Community / practitioner network around hardware
+
+**Referral:**
+- Hardware gifting flows (high WOM for physical products)
+- Eye-catching hardware drives organic social sharing
+- Reviews on Shopify + Amazon
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Blended LTV math is critical (hardware margin + software recurring)
+- Bundle strategy (hardware buy → free Premium for X months)
+- Annual plan default for software
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `seo-audit` for Shopify product pages
+- `emails` for both hardware post-purchase and software lifecycle
+- `referrals` with gifting layer
+- `pricing` for blended-bundle math
+- `ads` with creative-heavy Meta presence
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- Shopify product page optimization
+- Hardware post-purchase lifecycle ship
+- Bundle strategy formalization
+- Hardware → app activation audit
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 4 — Marketplace
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Two-sided product (supply + demand)
+- Network effects matter
+- Liquidity is the critical early metric
+- Take-rate × GMV is the revenue model
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- Two funnels — supply and demand
+- Supply often acquired through outbound / partnership / cold email
+- Demand often acquired through SEO / paid / content
+- City-by-city programmatic SEO common
+
+**Activation:**
+- Supply activation: first listing posted, first response sent
+- Demand activation: first purchase / first match / first transaction
+- Both sides need their own onboarding
+
+**Retention:**
+- Repeat transaction frequency
+- Supply utilization (% of listings active)
+- Demand habit (DAU / MAU)
+
+**Referral:**
+- Supply → supply (refer other providers)
+- Demand → demand (refer other buyers)
+- Cross-side referrals are weaker
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Take-rate optimization
+- Premium tier (better matching, lower fees)
+- Lead-gen vs. transaction-fee monetization
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `programmatic-seo` for city pages, vertical pages
+- `cold-email` for supply-side recruitment
+- `referrals` for both sides
+- `pricing` for take-rate decisions
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- Programmatic SEO build for one side
+- Cold outbound to seed supply (or demand, whichever is bottleneck)
+- Lifecycle email for both sides
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 5 — Developer Tool / Open Source
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Technical buyer (developer or eng leader)
+- High bar for content quality (developers are skeptical)
+- DevRel matters more than traditional marketing
+- Open source layer often funnel into commercial product
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- Technical content + docs SEO
+- DevRel (conferences, talks, community)
+- GitHub presence + npm/pip/etc. discovery
+- Hacker News + Reddit + dev Twitter
+
+**Activation:**
+- First build / first integration is the activation event
+- Time-to-Hello-World matters
+- Documentation = onboarding for dev tools
+
+**Retention:**
+- Depth of integration (using more of the product)
+- Team adoption (one user → entire org)
+- Active project count
+
+**Referral:**
+- Star count on GitHub (semi-organic)
+- Recommendation in technical forums
+- Conference talks mentioning the tool
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Free → paid conversion when usage exceeds limits
+- Team plans, enterprise tiers
+- Support / SLA upsells
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `programmatic-seo` for docs
+- Less emphasis on traditional `ads`
+- Heavy `content-strategy` + technical content
+- `cold-email` to engineering leads at target companies
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- Docs + technical content production
+- DevRel (founder doing talks)
+- GitHub presence
+- HN / Reddit / dev community
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 6 — Deep-Tech / Scientific / Clinical
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Long sales cycles
+- Heavy credibility burden (must prove the science)
+- Highly informed buyers (academics, clinicians, researchers)
+- Often regulatory considerations
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- Academic publishing + peer-reviewed studies
+- Conference speaking (academic + industry)
+- Investor / advisor introductions
+- PR via credibility hooks
+
+**Activation:**
+- Pilot programs / proof-of-concepts
+- Concierge setup with high-touch onboarding
+- Educational webinars / training
+
+**Retention:**
+- Customer success heavily
+- Co-publication with customers
+- Community of practice
+
+**Referral:**
+- Academic / clinical references
+- Conference panel features
+- Case studies with named institutions
+
+**Revenue:**
+- Pilot → paid expansion
+- Institutional contracts (multi-seat / multi-year)
+- Compliance / certification upsells
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- Light traditional marketing
+- Heavy `product-marketing`, `sales-enablement`, `pricing`
+- `cold-email` to specific researchers / practitioners
+- PR + investor marketing
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- Academic outreach + conference speaking
+- Investor backchannel for institutional warm intros
+- Pilot deployment with key customers
+- Case study + scientific publication
+
+---
+
+## Archetype 7 — Commerce / DTC (non-subscription)
+
+### Core characteristics
+- Physical or digital products sold transactionally
+- Average Order Value matters
+- Repeat purchase rate is the key retention metric
+
+### AARRR emphasis
+
+**Acquisition:**
+- Paid social (Meta, TikTok) often dominant
+- Shopify SEO for product pages
+- Amazon listings
+- Influencer + creator partnerships
+
+**Activation:**
+- First purchase is the activation event
+- Cart abandonment recovery
+- Trust signals on checkout (reviews, returns, shipping)
+
+**Retention:**
+- Post-purchase lifecycle
+- Loyalty programs
+- Email + SMS for repeat purchase
+
+**Referral:**
+- Gifting flows
+- Refer-a-friend programs
+- Reviews + UGC
+
+**Revenue:**
+- AOV optimization (bundles, upsells)
+- Customer LTV optimization (repeat purchase frequency)
+- Subscription option for repeat purchases
+
+### Skills emphasis
+- `ads` + `ad-creative` (heavy weight)
+- `emails` for post-purchase + abandoned cart
+- `referrals` with gifting
+- `pricing` for bundles + subscription option
+
+### Tier-1 budget priority
+- Shopify storefront optimization
+- Email lifecycle ship
+- Influencer / UGC seeding
+- Paid social testing (if minimal budget exists)
+
+---
+
+## How to use this doc when drafting a plan
+
+When you start drafting Sections 4–8 (AARRR), identify the client's archetype (or hybrid if applicable) and lean into the patterns above.
+
+**Hybrid cases are common.** Quietude is "Hybrid hardware + software" with significant overlap to "Deep-tech / scientific / clinical" (because of the peer-reviewed study + clinical positioning). The plan blends emphases from both archetypes.
+
+When in doubt, lead with the archetype that best fits the *primary monetization model*. Quietude's primary monetization is software subscription (with hardware as the wedge), so the D2C consumer app + hardware-hybrid patterns dominate, with deep-tech credibility moves layered in.
+
+## When the client doesn't fit cleanly
+
+Some clients defy archetype:
+- **Content / media businesses** — neither SaaS nor commerce; ad revenue or subscription model
+- **Social networks** — own category, network effects dominate
+- **Real estate / events** — physical + service model
+
+For these, identify the closest archetype and adjust. Don't force-fit — name the deviation in the plan's Strategic Frame.