kiro-agent-team 1.0.0

package/.kiro/guides/quality-assurance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+# Quality Assurance
+
+## ✅ **Systematic Quality Through Every Development Stage**
+
+Quality assurance in our agent system isn't just testing—it's a comprehensive approach to ensuring excellence at every stage of development. This guide covers the integrated quality processes that make our systematic development approach reliable and robust.
+
+## 🎯 **Quality Philosophy**
+
+### **Built-In Quality**
+Quality isn't added at the end—it's integrated into every workflow step through:
+- **Quality Gates**: Mandatory checkpoints that prevent issues from propagating
+- **Systematic Reviews**: Comprehensive analysis at each development stage
+- **Continuous Validation**: Ongoing quality monitoring throughout development
+- **Process Improvement**: Learning from quality metrics to enhance workflows
+
+### **Multi-Layer Quality Assurance**
+Our quality system operates at multiple levels:
+1. **Individual Agent Quality**: Each agent maintains internal quality standards
+2. **Workflow Quality**: Quality gates between workflow stages
+3. **Integration Quality**: System-wide quality validation
+4. **Process Quality**: Continuous improvement of quality processes themselves
+
+## 🛡️ **The 5 Quality Gates**
+
+### **Gate 1: Planning Quality**
+**Purpose**: Ensure comprehensive, well-thought-out plans before implementation
+**Trigger**: Before any significant development work begins
+**Process**: `@prime` + `@plan-feature` validation
+
+**Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] Project context fully loaded and understood
+- [ ] Feature requirements clearly defined
+- [ ] Architecture decisions documented
+- [ ] Task breakdown is granular and actionable
+- [ ] Dependencies identified and managed
+- [ ] Success criteria established
+
+**Commands:**
+```bash
+@prime                    # Load comprehensive context
+@plan-feature [name]      # Create detailed implementation plan
+```
+
+**Quality Validation:**
+```
+✅ Planning Quality Checklist:
+- Context loaded and validated
+- Requirements clear and complete
+- Architecture decisions documented
+- Tasks properly scoped (30min-4hr each)
+- Dependencies mapped and managed
+- Success criteria defined
+```
+
+### **Gate 2: Implementation Quality**
+**Purpose**: Ensure systematic, consistent implementation across all agents
+**Trigger**: During all development work
+**Process**: `@execute` framework compliance
+
+**Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] All agents follow `@execute` systematic approach
+- [ ] Code follows established patterns and conventions
+- [ ] Error handling is comprehensive
+- [ ] Security considerations addressed
+- [ ] Performance requirements met
+- [ ] Documentation updated
+
+**Framework Validation:**
+```bash
+@execute                  # Systematic implementation approach
+```
+
+**Quality Standards:**
+- **Code Quality**: Follows project conventions and best practices
+- **Security**: No vulnerabilities introduced
+- **Performance**: Meets established benchmarks
+- **Maintainability**: Clear, documented, testable code
+- **Integration**: Compatible with existing system architecture
+
+### **Gate 3: Review Quality**
+**Purpose**: Comprehensive quality validation before deployment
+**Trigger**: Before any deployment or major integration
+**Process**: `@code-review` comprehensive assessment
+
+**Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] Security vulnerabilities assessed and resolved
+- [ ] Performance benchmarks met or exceeded
+- [ ] Code quality meets project standards
+- [ ] Test coverage adequate for risk level
+- [ ] Documentation complete and accurate
+- [ ] Integration points validated
+
+**Commands:**
+```bash
+@code-review             # Comprehensive quality assessment
+```
+
+**Review Dimensions:**
+```
+🔍 Code Review Assessment:
+- Security: Vulnerability scan and manual review
+- Performance: Benchmark validation and optimization
+- Code Quality: Standards compliance and maintainability
+- Testing: Coverage analysis and test quality
+- Documentation: Completeness and accuracy
+- Integration: Compatibility and system impact
+```
+
+### **Gate 4: Documentation Quality**
+**Purpose**: Ensure comprehensive documentation and learning capture
+**Trigger**: After major implementations or milestones
+**Process**: `@execution-report` generation and validation
+
+**Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] Implementation details documented
+- [ ] Challenges and solutions captured
+- [ ] Quality metrics recorded
+- [ ] Lessons learned identified
+- [ ] Process insights documented
+- [ ] Knowledge base updated
+
+**Commands:**
+```bash
+@execution-report        # Comprehensive implementation documentation
+```
+
+**Documentation Standards:**
+```
+📊 Documentation Quality Requirements:
+- Implementation details: What was built and how
+- Quality metrics: Test coverage, performance, security
+- Challenges overcome: Problems faced and solutions
+- Lessons learned: Insights for future development
+- Process effectiveness: What worked well and what didn't
+```
+
+### **Gate 5: Process Quality**
+**Purpose**: Continuous improvement of development processes
+**Trigger**: Regular intervals and after major milestones
+**Process**: `@system-review` analysis and optimization
+
+**Quality Criteria:**
+- [ ] Process effectiveness analyzed
+- [ ] Improvement opportunities identified
+- [ ] Best practices documented and shared
+- [ ] Workflow optimizations implemented
+- [ ] Agent coordination enhanced
+- [ ] Quality metrics trending positively
+
+**Commands:**
+```bash
+@system-review [plan] [report]  # Process improvement analysis
+```
+
+**Process Improvement Framework:**
+```
+🔄 Process Quality Analysis:
+- Adherence: How well did implementation follow plan?
+- Efficiency: Were there unnecessary delays or rework?
+- Effectiveness: Did the process achieve desired outcomes?
+- Learning: What insights can improve future work?
+- Optimization: What specific improvements should be made?
+```
+
+## 🔍 **Quality Assessment Dimensions**
+
+### **Security Quality**
+**Automated Checks:**
+- Dependency vulnerability scanning
+- Static code analysis for security patterns
+- Authentication and authorization validation
+- Input validation and sanitization review
+
+**Manual Reviews:**
+- Architecture security assessment
+- Threat modeling for new features
+- Penetration testing for critical paths
+- Compliance validation (GDPR, HIPAA, etc.)
+
+**Security Commands:**
+```bash
+@rca [security-issue]     # Security incident analysis
+@implement-fix [issue]    # Systematic security fixes
+```
+
+### **Performance Quality**
+**Automated Monitoring:**
+- Response time benchmarks
+- Memory usage analysis
+- Database query performance
+- Frontend bundle size optimization
+
+**Performance Testing:**
+- Load testing for scalability
+- Stress testing for reliability
+- Benchmark comparison over time
+- Resource utilization analysis
+
+**Performance Validation:**
+```
+⚡ Performance Quality Gates:
+- API Response Times: < 200ms for standard operations
+- Database Queries: < 100ms for common queries
+- Frontend Load Time: < 3 seconds initial load
+- Memory Usage: Within established limits
+- CPU Utilization: Efficient resource usage
+```
+
+### **Code Quality**
+**Automated Analysis:**
+- Linting and formatting compliance
+- Code complexity analysis
+- Test coverage measurement
+- Documentation coverage assessment
+
+**Manual Review:**
+- Architecture pattern compliance
+- Code readability and maintainability
+- Error handling completeness
+- Integration point validation
+
+**Code Quality Standards:**
+```
+📝 Code Quality Requirements:
+- Formatting: Consistent with project standards
+- Complexity: Manageable and well-structured
+- Documentation: Clear comments and documentation
+- Testing: Adequate coverage and quality
+- Patterns: Follows established architecture
+- Maintainability: Easy to understand and modify
+```
+
+### **Integration Quality**
+**System Integration:**
+- API contract validation
+- Database schema compatibility
+- Frontend-backend integration
+- Third-party service integration
+
+**Quality Integration:**
+- Cross-component testing
+- End-to-end workflow validation
+- Data flow integrity
+- Error propagation handling
+
+## 🎯 **Quality Metrics and Monitoring**
+
+### **Development Velocity Quality**
+**Metrics:**
+- Time from feature request to deployment
+- Percentage of features delivered on time
+- Rework rate (features requiring significant changes)
+- Quality gate pass rate on first attempt
+
+**Targets:**
+- 90%+ features delivered on schedule
+- <10% rework rate
+- 95%+ quality gate pass rate
+- Continuous improvement in velocity
+
+### **Defect Quality**
+**Metrics:**
+- Production incidents per release
+- Security vulnerabilities discovered
+- Performance regressions introduced
+- User-reported issues
+
+**Targets:**
+- <1 critical incident per release
+- Zero high-severity security vulnerabilities
+- No performance regressions
+- <5% increase in user-reported issues
+
+### **Process Quality**
+**Metrics:**
+- Agent coordination efficiency
+- Process adherence rate
+- Knowledge retention and reuse
+- Continuous improvement implementation
+
+**Targets:**
+- 95%+ process adherence
+- Increasing knowledge reuse over time
+- Regular process improvements implemented
+- High team satisfaction with workflows
+
+## 🚨 **Quality Issue Response**
+
+### **Issue Classification**
+**Critical (Immediate Response):**
+- Security vulnerabilities
+- Production outages
+- Data corruption risks
+- Compliance violations
+
+**High (24-hour Response):**
+- Performance degradation
+- Feature functionality issues
+- Integration failures
+- Quality gate failures
+
+**Medium (Weekly Response):**
+- Code quality improvements
+- Documentation gaps
+- Process optimizations
+- Non-critical enhancements
+
+### **Response Workflows**
+
+#### **Critical Issue Response**
+```bash
+# Immediate analysis
+@rca [critical-issue-id]
+
+# Systematic fix
+@implement-fix [critical-issue-id]
+
+# Emergency validation
+@code-review
+
+# Post-incident learning
+@system-review [rca] [fix-report]
+```
+
+#### **Quality Improvement Workflow**
+```bash
+# Regular quality assessment
+@code-review
+
+# Identify improvement areas
+@execution-report
+
+# Process optimization
+@system-review [current-process] [quality-metrics]
+
+# Implement improvements
+[Update workflows and standards]
+```
+
+## 🔧 **Quality Tools Integration**
+
+### **Automated Quality Tools**
+**Static Analysis:**
+- ESLint/TSLint for code quality
+- SonarQube for comprehensive analysis
+- Security scanners (Snyk, OWASP ZAP)
+- Performance profilers
+
+**Testing Frameworks:**
+- Jest for unit testing
+- Playwright for end-to-end testing
+- Artillery for load testing
+- Accessibility testing tools
+
+**CI/CD Integration:**
+- Automated quality gates in pipelines
+- Quality metrics collection
+- Deployment blocking on quality failures
+- Automated reporting and notifications
+
+### **Manual Quality Processes**
+**Code Reviews:**
+- Peer review requirements
+- Architecture review for major changes
+- Security review for sensitive areas
+- Performance review for critical paths
+
+**Quality Audits:**
+- Regular comprehensive assessments
+- External security audits
+- Performance benchmarking
+- Process effectiveness reviews
+
+## 🎓 **Quality Assurance Best Practices**
+
+### **Proactive Quality**
+- **Shift Left**: Address quality early in development
+- **Prevention Focus**: Prevent issues rather than fix them
+- **Continuous Monitoring**: Ongoing quality assessment
+- **Learning Culture**: Learn from quality issues to prevent recurrence
+
+### **Quality Communication**
+- **Clear Standards**: Well-defined quality criteria
+- **Regular Reporting**: Consistent quality metrics sharing
+- **Issue Transparency**: Open discussion of quality challenges
+- **Success Recognition**: Celebrate quality achievements
+
+### **Quality Evolution**
+- **Metric-Driven**: Use data to guide quality improvements
+- **Process Refinement**: Continuously improve quality processes
+- **Tool Enhancement**: Upgrade and optimize quality tools
+- **Team Development**: Invest in quality skills and knowledge
+
+## 📊 **Quality Dashboard**
+
+### **Real-Time Quality Metrics**
+```
+🎯 Current Quality Status:
+- Quality Gate Pass Rate: 96% (Target: 95%)
+- Test Coverage: 87% (Target: 80%)
+- Security Vulnerabilities: 0 Critical, 2 Medium
+- Performance: All benchmarks within targets
+- Process Adherence: 98% (Target: 95%)
+- Team Satisfaction: 4.8/5.0
+```
+
+### **Quality Trends**
+- **Improving**: Test coverage, process adherence
+- **Stable**: Performance metrics, security posture
+- **Focus Areas**: Documentation completeness, cross-agent coordination
+
+## 🚀 **Quality Maturity Path**
+
+### **Level 1: Basic Quality**
+- [ ] All quality gates implemented
+- [ ] Basic metrics collection
+- [ ] Standard quality processes followed
+
+### **Level 2: Systematic Quality**
+- [ ] Automated quality validation
+- [ ] Comprehensive metrics analysis
+- [ ] Proactive quality improvement
+
+### **Level 3: Optimized Quality**
+- [ ] Predictive quality analytics
+- [ ] Continuous process optimization
+- [ ] Quality leadership and mentoring
+
+---
+
+**Need to handle critical issues? Check out [Emergency Procedures](emergency-procedures.md) for rapid response with maintained quality standards!**

package/.kiro/guides/quick-start.md

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+# Quick Start Guide
+
+## 🚀 **Get Up and Running in 15 Minutes**
+
+This guide will get you productive with the agent team system immediately. Follow these steps to start leveraging systematic, quality-driven development.
+
+## ⚡ **5-Minute Setup**
+
+### **Step 1: Understand Your Team**
+You have **9 specialist agents** ready to help:
+- **Project Manager**: Coordinates everything
+- **Backend/Frontend/Database/DevOps/Security/Test/UX/Logger**: Specialists for each domain
+
+### **Step 2: Learn the Core Commands**
+```bash
+@prime                    # Load project context (always start here)
+@plan-feature [name]      # Plan before you build
+@execute                  # Implement systematically
+@code-review             # Validate quality
+```
+
+### **Step 3: First Workflow Test**
+Try this right now:
+```bash
+@prime
+# Wait for Project Manager to load context
+# Then try planning a simple feature
+@plan-feature "Add user profile page"
+```
+
+## 🎯 **Your First 3 Workflows**
+
+### **Workflow 1: New Feature Development (10 minutes)**
+```bash
+# 1. Load context
+@prime
+
+# 2. Plan the feature
+@plan-feature "User authentication"
+
+# 3. Let assigned agents implement
+@execute
+
+# 4. Review quality
+@code-review
+
+# 5. Document results
+@execution-report
+```
+
+**Expected Result**: Complete feature plan with task assignments and quality validation.
+
+### **Workflow 2: Code Quality Check (5 minutes)**
+```bash
+# Review any code changes
+@code-review
+
+# Get comprehensive quality assessment
+# - Security analysis
+# - Performance review
+# - Code quality metrics
+# - Deployment readiness
+```
+
+**Expected Result**: Detailed quality report with specific recommendations.
+
+### **Workflow 3: Emergency Bug Fix (15 minutes)**
+```bash
+# 1. Analyze the problem
+@rca [github-issue-id]
+
+# 2. Implement systematic fix
+@implement-fix [github-issue-id]
+
+# 3. Validate the solution
+@code-review
+```
+
+**Expected Result**: Systematic problem analysis, fix implementation, and quality validation.
+
+## 🎭 **Agent Quick Reference**
+
+### **When to Use Each Agent**
+
+**🎯 Project Manager** - Use for:
+- Starting any new work (`@prime`)
+- Planning features (`@plan-feature`)
+- Creating requirements (`@create-prd`)
+
+**🔧 Backend Engineer** - Use for:
+- API development and business logic
+- Database integration
+- Server-side functionality
+
+**🎨 Frontend Architect** - Use for:
+- User interface development
+- State management
+- User experience implementation
+
+**🛡️ Security Specialist** - Use for:
+- Security vulnerabilities (`@rca`, `@implement-fix`)
+- Security reviews and audits
+- Compliance requirements
+
+**✅ Test Orchestrator** - Use for:
+- Quality assurance (`@code-review`)
+- Implementation documentation (`@execution-report`)
+- Project evaluation (`@code-review-hackathon`)
+
+## 🔄 **Essential Patterns**
+
+### **Pattern 1: Always Start with Context**
+```bash
+# ALWAYS do this first for any new work
+@prime
+```
+**Why**: Ensures all agents work from shared understanding.
+
+### **Pattern 2: Plan Before Implementation**
+```bash
+# Before building anything significant
+@plan-feature [feature-name]
+```
+**Why**: Prevents scope creep and coordination issues.
+
+### **Pattern 3: Quality Gates**
+```bash
+# Before any deployment
+@code-review
+```
+**Why**: Catches issues before they reach production.
+
+### **Pattern 4: Document and Learn**
+```bash
+# After major implementations
+@execution-report
+@system-review [plan] [report]
+```
+**Why**: Captures insights and improves processes.
+
+## ⚠️ **Common Mistakes to Avoid**
+
+### **❌ Don't Skip Planning**
+```bash
+# Wrong: Jump straight to implementation
+@execute
+
+# Right: Plan first
+@prime
+@plan-feature [name]
+@execute
+```
+
+### **❌ Don't Ignore Quality Gates**
+```bash
+# Wrong: Deploy without review
+git push origin main
+
+# Right: Review first
+@code-review
+# Then deploy after approval
+```
+
+### **❌ Don't Work in Isolation**
+```bash
+# Wrong: Individual agent work
+Backend Engineer: Build API alone
+
+# Right: Coordinated approach
+Project Manager: @plan-feature
+Backend Engineer: @execute
+Test Orchestrator: @code-review
+```
+
+## 🎯 **Success Indicators**
+
+### **You're Doing It Right When:**
+- ✅ Every feature starts with `@prime` and `@plan-feature`
+- ✅ All implementations use `@execute` framework
+- ✅ Nothing deploys without `@code-review` approval
+- ✅ You regularly generate `@execution-report` for learning
+- ✅ Agents coordinate smoothly with clear handoffs
+
+### **Red Flags to Watch For:**
+- ❌ Skipping planning phase
+- ❌ Working without agent coordination
+- ❌ Deploying without quality review
+- ❌ Not documenting implementations
+- ❌ Repeating the same mistakes
+
+## 🚀 **Next Steps**
+
+### **After This Quick Start:**
+
+**Immediate (Today):**
+1. Try all 3 workflows above with your current project
+2. Read [Core Workflows](core-workflows.md) for comprehensive patterns
+3. Bookmark [Troubleshooting](troubleshooting.md) for when you need help
+
+**This Week:**
+1. Master [Agent Coordination](agent-coordination.md) patterns
+2. Implement [Quality Assurance](quality-assurance.md) processes
+3. Set up [Emergency Procedures](emergency-procedures.md) for your team
+
+**Next Week:**
+1. Explore [Advanced Patterns](advanced-patterns.md)
+2. Try [Project Evaluation](project-evaluation.md) methods
+3. Customize workflows for your specific needs
+
+## 🆘 **Need Help?**
+
+### **Quick Solutions:**
+- **Command not working?** → [Troubleshooting](troubleshooting.md)
+- **Agent coordination issues?** → [Agent Coordination](agent-coordination.md)
+- **Quality problems?** → [Quality Assurance](quality-assurance.md)
+- **Emergency situation?** → [Emergency Procedures](emergency-procedures.md)
+
+### **Learning Resources:**
+- **Comprehensive workflows**: [Core Workflows](core-workflows.md)
+- **Real examples**: `IMPLEMENTATION_EXAMPLES.md` in root directory
+- **Command reference**: `QUICK_REFERENCE.md` in root directory
+
+## 🎉 **You're Ready!**
+
+With these basics, you can immediately start benefiting from:
+- **Systematic development** with predictable outcomes
+- **Built-in quality assurance** preventing issues
+- **Agent coordination** eliminating conflicts
+- **Continuous improvement** through process learning
+
+**Start with `@prime` and begin your systematic development journey!**
+
+---
+
+*Quick Start complete! Ready for [Core Workflows](core-workflows.md)?*