kiro-agent-team 1.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.kiro/README.md +228 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/backend-engineer.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/backend-engineer.md +643 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/database-specialist.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/database-specialist.md +390 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/development-logger.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/development-logger.md +265 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/devops-engineer.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/devops-engineer.md +287 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/frontend-architect.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/frontend-architect.md +1032 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/backend-engineer-hooks.yaml +540 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/database-specialist-hooks.yaml +488 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/development-logger-hooks.yaml +361 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/devops-engineer-hooks.yaml +345 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/frontend-architect-hooks.yaml +521 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/project-manager-hooks.yaml +513 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/security-specialist-hooks.yaml +358 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/test-orchestrator-hooks.yaml +380 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/hooks/ui-ux-designer-hooks.yaml +353 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/project-manager.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/project-manager.md +344 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/backend-engineer-system.md +815 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/database-specialist-system.md +332 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/development-logger-system.md +232 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/devops-engineer-system.md +260 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/frontend-architect-system.md +305 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/project-manager-system.md +285 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/security-specialist-system.md +231 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/test-orchestrator-system.md +214 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/prompts/ui-ux-designer-system.md +270 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/security-specialist.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/security-specialist.md +277 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/test-orchestrator.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/test-orchestrator.md +266 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/ui-ux-designer.json +6 -0
- package/.kiro/agents/ui-ux-designer.md +284 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/00-START-HERE.md +444 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/COMPLETE-WORKFLOW.md +553 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/DEVLOG-INTEGRATION.md +413 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/DEVLOG-PROCESS-FLOWS.md +484 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/DEVLOG-QUICK-REF.md +299 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/DEVLOG.md +22 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/IMPLEMENTATION-COMPLETE.txt +434 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/IMPLEMENTATION-SUMMARY.md +358 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/README.md +363 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/devlog-update.bat +136 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/devlog-update.sh +275 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/feature-completion-hook.bat +78 -0
- package/.kiro/devlog/feature-completion-hook.sh +84 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/cli.md +31 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli.md +41 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_authentication.md +43 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_autocomplete.md +132 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_billing.md +31 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_billing_contact-support.md +43 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_billing_managing-taxes.md +67 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_billing_related-questions.md +49 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_billing_subscription-portal.md +31 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat.md +84 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_configuration.md +40 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_context.md +258 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_git-aware-selection.md +41 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_images.md +53 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_manage-prompts.md +216 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_model-selection.md +153 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_permissions.md +68 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_planning-agent.md +230 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_responding.md +123 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_security.md +87 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_chat_subagents.md +77 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_code-intelligence.md +251 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_custom-agents.md +37 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_custom-agents_configuration-reference.md +941 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_custom-agents_creating.md +93 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_custom-agents_examples.md +360 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_custom-agents_troubleshooting.md +180 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_billing.md +33 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_concepts.md +34 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_getting-started.md +19 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_iam.md +251 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_monitor-and-track.md +15 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_monitor-and-track_dashboard.md +62 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_monitor-and-track_prompt-logging.md +165 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_monitor-and-track_user-activity.md +123 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_settings.md +15 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_subscribe.md +36 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_subscription-management.md +55 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_enterprise_supported-regions.md +39 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental.md +282 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_checkpointing.md +439 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_delegate.md +422 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_knowledge-management.md +449 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_tangent-mode.md +357 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_thinking.md +331 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_experimental_todo-lists.md +385 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_hooks.md +207 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_installation.md +235 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_mcp.md +106 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_mcp_configuration.md +294 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_mcp_examples.md +273 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_mcp_governance.md +436 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_mcp_security.md +77 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_migrating-from-q.md +129 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security.md +83 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security_compliance-validation.md +17 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security_data-protection.md +104 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security_firewalls.md +26 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security_infrastructure-security.md +10 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_privacy-and-security_vpc-endpoints.md +41 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_reference_built-in-tools.md +624 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_reference_cli-commands.md +689 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_reference_settings.md +294 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_reference_slash-commands.md +559 -0
- package/.kiro/documentation/docs_cli_steering.md +84 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/AGENT_WORKFLOW_GUIDE.md +294 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/DEVLOG.md +882 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/IMPLEMENTATION_EXAMPLES.md +611 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/PIV Loop.md +122 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/PIV Loop.png +0 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/PIVLoop.png +0 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/QUICK_REFERENCE.md +202 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/README.md +149 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/advanced-patterns.md +514 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/agent-coordination.md +434 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/core-workflows.md +409 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/emergency-procedures.md +414 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/project-evaluation.md +534 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/quality-assurance.md +431 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/quick-start.md +235 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/troubleshooting.md +575 -0
- package/.kiro/guides/walkthroughs.md +711 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/add-to-devlog.md +263 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/code-review-fix.md +18 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/code-review-hackathon.md +167 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/code-review-security.md +454 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/code-review.md +113 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/create-prd.md +151 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute-backend.md +257 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute-frontend.md +438 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute-logging.md +491 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute-security.md +482 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute-testing.md +528 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execute.md +101 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/execution-report.md +72 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/implement-fix.md +228 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/plan-feature.md +433 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/prime.md +73 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/quality-metrics.md +622 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/quickstart.md +318 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/rca.md +220 -0
- package/.kiro/prompts/system-review.md +189 -0
- package/README.md +32 -0
- package/bin/cli.js +97 -0
- package/package.json +33 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Test Orchestrator Agent - Hook Configurations
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
# Initial Testing Consultation
|
|
4
|
+
consultation:
|
|
5
|
+
- name: "testing_consultation"
|
|
6
|
+
description: "Initiate testing strategy consultation for new projects"
|
|
7
|
+
trigger:
|
|
8
|
+
type: "message_pattern"
|
|
9
|
+
pattern: "(?i)(testing|test|quality|qa|jest|cypress|playwright)"
|
|
10
|
+
action:
|
|
11
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
12
|
+
message: |
|
|
13
|
+
🧪 **Test Orchestrator Consultation Started**
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
I'll help you design the optimal testing strategy for your specific needs:
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
**🎯 Quality Requirements Questions:**
|
|
18
|
+
- What are your quality standards and risk tolerance?
|
|
19
|
+
• High reliability (comprehensive testing, strict quality gates)
|
|
20
|
+
• Balanced approach (pragmatic testing, reasonable coverage)
|
|
21
|
+
• Rapid iteration (lightweight testing, fast feedback)
|
|
22
|
+
• Custom requirements
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
- What types of testing are most important?
|
|
25
|
+
• Unit testing (component/function level)
|
|
26
|
+
• Integration testing (component interaction)
|
|
27
|
+
• End-to-end testing (user journey validation)
|
|
28
|
+
• Performance testing (load, stress, benchmarking)
|
|
29
|
+
• Security testing (vulnerability scanning)
|
|
30
|
+
• Accessibility testing (WCAG compliance)
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**📋 Project Context Questions:**
|
|
33
|
+
- What's your development methodology?
|
|
34
|
+
• Test-Driven Development (TDD)
|
|
35
|
+
• Behavior-Driven Development (BDD)
|
|
36
|
+
• Traditional testing (test after development)
|
|
37
|
+
• Exploratory testing focus
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
- Release frequency and deployment strategy?
|
|
40
|
+
• Continuous deployment
|
|
41
|
+
• Weekly/bi-weekly releases
|
|
42
|
+
• Milestone-based releases
|
|
43
|
+
• Custom schedule
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- Team's testing experience level?
|
|
46
|
+
• Beginner (need guidance and training)
|
|
47
|
+
• Intermediate (some testing experience)
|
|
48
|
+
• Advanced (experienced with testing practices)
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
**🛠️ Technical Infrastructure Questions:**
|
|
51
|
+
- Do you have existing testing infrastructure or tool preferences?
|
|
52
|
+
- CI/CD setup? (GitHub Actions, Jenkins, GitLab CI, other)
|
|
53
|
+
- What environments need testing? (Local, staging, production-like)
|
|
54
|
+
- Browser/device support requirements?
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
**📊 Coverage & Scope Questions:**
|
|
57
|
+
- What parts of the application are most critical to test?
|
|
58
|
+
- Target test coverage percentage? (80%, 90%, or risk-based)
|
|
59
|
+
- Need performance testing? (Load testing, stress testing, benchmarks)
|
|
60
|
+
- Desired automation level? (Fully automated, mixed, manual focus)
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Based on your answers, I'll design a comprehensive testing strategy with the right tools, coverage levels, and automation approach!
|
|
63
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
# Systematic Testing Implementation
|
|
66
|
+
systematic_testing:
|
|
67
|
+
- name: "systematic_testing_implementation"
|
|
68
|
+
description: "Execute systematic testing using standardized framework"
|
|
69
|
+
trigger:
|
|
70
|
+
type: "user_command"
|
|
71
|
+
conditions:
|
|
72
|
+
- command: "execute"
|
|
73
|
+
- agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
74
|
+
action:
|
|
75
|
+
type: "execute_prompt"
|
|
76
|
+
prompt: "execute-testing.md"
|
|
77
|
+
message: "Executing systematic testing implementation with comprehensive quality validation and coverage analysis..."
|
|
78
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
79
|
+
include_context:
|
|
80
|
+
- testing_requirements: true
|
|
81
|
+
- quality_standards: true
|
|
82
|
+
- coverage_targets: true
|
|
83
|
+
- performance_benchmarks: true
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
# Testing Lifecycle Hooks
|
|
86
|
+
testing_lifecycle:
|
|
87
|
+
- name: "test_execution_trigger"
|
|
88
|
+
description: "Trigger comprehensive testing when code changes are detected"
|
|
89
|
+
trigger:
|
|
90
|
+
type: "file_change"
|
|
91
|
+
conditions:
|
|
92
|
+
- file_pattern: ["**/*.ts", "**/*.tsx", "**/*.js", "**/*.jsx"]
|
|
93
|
+
- change_type: ["modified", "created"]
|
|
94
|
+
action:
|
|
95
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
96
|
+
message: |
|
|
97
|
+
🔍 **Code Changes Detected - Testing Analysis Required**
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
I'll analyze the changes and determine appropriate testing strategy:
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
**Automated Testing Checklist:**
|
|
102
|
+
- Run affected unit tests
|
|
103
|
+
- Execute integration tests for modified components
|
|
104
|
+
- Trigger E2E tests for critical user paths
|
|
105
|
+
- Validate code coverage thresholds
|
|
106
|
+
- Check for regression in existing functionality
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
**Quality Gates:**
|
|
109
|
+
- All tests must pass before deployment
|
|
110
|
+
- Coverage thresholds must be maintained
|
|
111
|
+
- Performance benchmarks must not regress
|
|
112
|
+
- Security scans must show no new vulnerabilities
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Initiating test execution and quality validation...
|
|
115
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
- name: "feature_completion_testing"
|
|
118
|
+
description: "Comprehensive testing when features are marked as complete"
|
|
119
|
+
trigger:
|
|
120
|
+
type: "task_status_change"
|
|
121
|
+
conditions:
|
|
122
|
+
- status: "done"
|
|
123
|
+
- task_type: ["feature", "enhancement"]
|
|
124
|
+
action:
|
|
125
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
126
|
+
message: |
|
|
127
|
+
✅ **Feature Completion - Quality Validation Required**
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
Feature marked as complete. Initiating comprehensive quality validation:
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
**Testing Validation:**
|
|
132
|
+
- Unit test coverage for new functionality
|
|
133
|
+
- Integration tests for component interactions
|
|
134
|
+
- E2E tests for complete user workflows
|
|
135
|
+
- Performance impact assessment
|
|
136
|
+
- Accessibility compliance verification
|
|
137
|
+
- Cross-browser compatibility testing
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
**Quality Metrics:**
|
|
140
|
+
- Code coverage analysis
|
|
141
|
+
- Test execution results
|
|
142
|
+
- Performance benchmark comparison
|
|
143
|
+
- Security vulnerability scan
|
|
144
|
+
- Documentation completeness check
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
Generating comprehensive quality report...
|
|
147
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
# Quality Assurance Hooks
|
|
150
|
+
quality_assurance:
|
|
151
|
+
- name: "code_review_execution"
|
|
152
|
+
description: "Execute systematic code review using standardized prompts"
|
|
153
|
+
trigger:
|
|
154
|
+
type: "user_command"
|
|
155
|
+
conditions:
|
|
156
|
+
- command: "code-review"
|
|
157
|
+
- parameters: ["scope"]
|
|
158
|
+
action:
|
|
159
|
+
type: "execute_prompt"
|
|
160
|
+
prompt: "code-review.md"
|
|
161
|
+
message: "Initiating comprehensive code review with systematic quality assessment..."
|
|
162
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
163
|
+
include_context:
|
|
164
|
+
- code_changes: true
|
|
165
|
+
- quality_standards: true
|
|
166
|
+
- testing_requirements: true
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
- name: "execution_report_generation"
|
|
169
|
+
description: "Generate comprehensive implementation reports for system review"
|
|
170
|
+
trigger:
|
|
171
|
+
type: "user_command"
|
|
172
|
+
conditions:
|
|
173
|
+
- command: "execution-report"
|
|
174
|
+
- command: "implementation-report"
|
|
175
|
+
action:
|
|
176
|
+
type: "execute_prompt"
|
|
177
|
+
prompt: "execution-report.md"
|
|
178
|
+
message: "Generating comprehensive execution report for system review and process improvement..."
|
|
179
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
180
|
+
include_context:
|
|
181
|
+
- implementation_details: true
|
|
182
|
+
- quality_metrics: true
|
|
183
|
+
- testing_results: true
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
- name: "hackathon_evaluation"
|
|
186
|
+
description: "Comprehensive project evaluation against hackathon judging criteria"
|
|
187
|
+
trigger:
|
|
188
|
+
type: "user_command"
|
|
189
|
+
conditions:
|
|
190
|
+
- command: "hackathon-review"
|
|
191
|
+
- command: "project-evaluation"
|
|
192
|
+
action:
|
|
193
|
+
type: "execute_prompt"
|
|
194
|
+
prompt: "code-review-hackathon.md"
|
|
195
|
+
message: "Evaluating project against comprehensive hackathon judging criteria..."
|
|
196
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
197
|
+
include_context:
|
|
198
|
+
- project_scope: true
|
|
199
|
+
- documentation_quality: true
|
|
200
|
+
- innovation_factors: true
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
- name: "deployment_readiness_check"
|
|
203
|
+
description: "Final quality validation before deployment"
|
|
204
|
+
trigger:
|
|
205
|
+
type: "message_pattern"
|
|
206
|
+
pattern: "(?i)(deploy|deployment|release|production)"
|
|
207
|
+
action:
|
|
208
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
209
|
+
message: |
|
|
210
|
+
🚀 **Deployment Readiness Assessment**
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
Performing final quality validation before deployment:
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
**Pre-Deployment Quality Gates:**
|
|
215
|
+
- ✅ All unit tests passing
|
|
216
|
+
- ✅ Integration tests successful
|
|
217
|
+
- ✅ E2E tests covering critical paths
|
|
218
|
+
- ✅ Performance benchmarks within acceptable range
|
|
219
|
+
- ✅ Security scans showing no critical vulnerabilities
|
|
220
|
+
- ✅ Accessibility compliance verified
|
|
221
|
+
- ✅ Code coverage meeting target thresholds
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
**Risk Assessment:**
|
|
224
|
+
- Impact analysis of changes
|
|
225
|
+
- Rollback procedure validation
|
|
226
|
+
- Monitoring and alerting readiness
|
|
227
|
+
- Database migration safety check
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
**Recommendation:** [PASS/FAIL] based on quality gate results
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
Use @code-review for comprehensive quality assessment before deployment.
|
|
232
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
233
|
+
|
|
234
|
+
- name: "bug_detection_workflow"
|
|
235
|
+
description: "Systematic bug tracking and resolution workflow"
|
|
236
|
+
trigger:
|
|
237
|
+
type: "test_failure"
|
|
238
|
+
conditions:
|
|
239
|
+
- failure_type: ["unit", "integration", "e2e"]
|
|
240
|
+
- severity: ["high", "critical"]
|
|
241
|
+
action:
|
|
242
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
243
|
+
message: |
|
|
244
|
+
🐛 **Bug Detection - Quality Issue Identified**
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
Test failure detected requiring immediate attention:
|
|
247
|
+
|
|
248
|
+
**Bug Analysis:**
|
|
249
|
+
- Test failure details and stack trace
|
|
250
|
+
- Impact assessment (affected functionality)
|
|
251
|
+
- Root cause analysis recommendations
|
|
252
|
+
- Regression risk evaluation
|
|
253
|
+
|
|
254
|
+
**Resolution Workflow:**
|
|
255
|
+
- Assign to appropriate development agent
|
|
256
|
+
- Create detailed bug report with reproduction steps
|
|
257
|
+
- Establish fix priority based on severity and impact
|
|
258
|
+
- Plan regression testing after fix implementation
|
|
259
|
+
|
|
260
|
+
**Quality Impact:**
|
|
261
|
+
- Block deployment until resolution
|
|
262
|
+
- Update quality metrics and tracking
|
|
263
|
+
- Review testing gaps that allowed the issue
|
|
264
|
+
- Implement additional tests to prevent recurrence
|
|
265
|
+
|
|
266
|
+
Initiating bug resolution workflow...
|
|
267
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
268
|
+
|
|
269
|
+
# Performance and Load Testing
|
|
270
|
+
performance_testing:
|
|
271
|
+
- name: "performance_regression_check"
|
|
272
|
+
description: "Monitor for performance regressions in new code"
|
|
273
|
+
trigger:
|
|
274
|
+
type: "performance_threshold"
|
|
275
|
+
conditions:
|
|
276
|
+
- metric_type: ["response_time", "memory_usage", "cpu_usage"]
|
|
277
|
+
- threshold_exceeded: true
|
|
278
|
+
action:
|
|
279
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
280
|
+
message: |
|
|
281
|
+
⚡ **Performance Regression Detected**
|
|
282
|
+
|
|
283
|
+
Performance metrics have exceeded acceptable thresholds:
|
|
284
|
+
|
|
285
|
+
**Performance Analysis:**
|
|
286
|
+
- Identify specific performance bottlenecks
|
|
287
|
+
- Compare current metrics with baseline
|
|
288
|
+
- Analyze impact on user experience
|
|
289
|
+
- Determine if regression is acceptable or requires fix
|
|
290
|
+
|
|
291
|
+
**Optimization Recommendations:**
|
|
292
|
+
- Code optimization opportunities
|
|
293
|
+
- Database query improvements
|
|
294
|
+
- Caching strategy enhancements
|
|
295
|
+
- Infrastructure scaling considerations
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
**Quality Impact:**
|
|
298
|
+
- Performance test results documentation
|
|
299
|
+
- Recommendation for deployment approval
|
|
300
|
+
- Long-term performance monitoring setup
|
|
301
|
+
- Performance budget establishment
|
|
302
|
+
|
|
303
|
+
Generating detailed performance analysis report...
|
|
304
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
305
|
+
|
|
306
|
+
# Continuous Improvement
|
|
307
|
+
continuous_improvement:
|
|
308
|
+
- name: "testing_metrics_analysis"
|
|
309
|
+
description: "Regular analysis of testing effectiveness and improvements"
|
|
310
|
+
trigger:
|
|
311
|
+
type: "schedule"
|
|
312
|
+
conditions:
|
|
313
|
+
- frequency: "weekly"
|
|
314
|
+
- day: "friday"
|
|
315
|
+
action:
|
|
316
|
+
type: "send_message"
|
|
317
|
+
message: |
|
|
318
|
+
📊 **Weekly Testing Metrics Analysis**
|
|
319
|
+
|
|
320
|
+
Analyzing testing effectiveness and identifying improvement opportunities:
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
**Quality Metrics Review:**
|
|
323
|
+
- Test coverage trends and gaps
|
|
324
|
+
- Test execution time and efficiency
|
|
325
|
+
- Bug detection rate and severity distribution
|
|
326
|
+
- False positive/negative rates in automated tests
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
**Process Effectiveness:**
|
|
329
|
+
- Developer adoption of testing practices
|
|
330
|
+
- Quality gate effectiveness
|
|
331
|
+
- Time to feedback for test results
|
|
332
|
+
- Testing tool performance and reliability
|
|
333
|
+
|
|
334
|
+
**Improvement Recommendations:**
|
|
335
|
+
- Testing process optimizations
|
|
336
|
+
- Tool upgrades or replacements
|
|
337
|
+
- Training needs identification
|
|
338
|
+
- Quality standard adjustments
|
|
339
|
+
|
|
340
|
+
**Action Items:**
|
|
341
|
+
- Update testing documentation
|
|
342
|
+
- Schedule team training sessions
|
|
343
|
+
- Implement process improvements
|
|
344
|
+
- Plan tool evaluations or upgrades
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
346
|
+
Preparing comprehensive testing effectiveness report...
|
|
347
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
348
|
+
|
|
349
|
+
- name: "quality_metrics_collection"
|
|
350
|
+
description: "Collect testing and quality assurance metrics"
|
|
351
|
+
trigger:
|
|
352
|
+
type: "testing_cycle_completion"
|
|
353
|
+
conditions:
|
|
354
|
+
- cycle_type: ["feature", "regression", "performance"]
|
|
355
|
+
action:
|
|
356
|
+
type: "execute_prompt"
|
|
357
|
+
prompt: "quality-metrics.md"
|
|
358
|
+
message: "Collecting testing quality metrics: coverage, effectiveness, and defect detection..."
|
|
359
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
360
|
+
include_context:
|
|
361
|
+
- test_results: true
|
|
362
|
+
- coverage_analysis: true
|
|
363
|
+
- quality_indicators: true
|
|
364
|
+
|
|
365
|
+
# Hook Configuration Metadata
|
|
366
|
+
metadata:
|
|
367
|
+
agent: "test-orchestrator"
|
|
368
|
+
version: "1.0"
|
|
369
|
+
created: "2026-01-04"
|
|
370
|
+
description: "Comprehensive hook configuration for Test Orchestrator Agent covering testing strategy, quality assurance, performance monitoring, and continuous improvement"
|
|
371
|
+
|
|
372
|
+
# Hook Categories
|
|
373
|
+
categories:
|
|
374
|
+
- consultation
|
|
375
|
+
- testing-lifecycle
|
|
376
|
+
- quality-assurance
|
|
377
|
+
- performance-testing
|
|
378
|
+
- continuous-improvement
|
|
379
|
+
- bug-tracking
|
|
380
|
+
- deployment-readiness
|