kiro-agent-team 1.0.0

package/.kiro/guides/IMPLEMENTATION_EXAMPLES.md

@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+# Agent Team Implementation Examples
+
+## Real-World Implementation Scenarios
+
+This document provides concrete examples of how to execute the agent workflows with actual commands, expected outputs, and success criteria.
+
+## Example 1: Building a User Authentication System
+
+### Scenario Setup
+- **Project**: TaskFlow Application
+- **Feature**: Complete user authentication with JWT tokens
+- **Timeline**: 2-week sprint
+- **Team**: Full 9-agent team coordination
+
+### Step-by-Step Implementation
+
+#### Phase 1: Project Context and Planning
+
+**1. Load Project Context**
+```bash
+# Command
+@prime
+
+# Expected Agent Response (Project Manager)
+🎯 **Project Context Loading Complete**
+
+**Project Analysis:**
+- Codebase: Node.js/TypeScript backend, React/TypeScript frontend
+- Database: PostgreSQL with Prisma ORM
+- Current State: Basic project structure, no authentication
+- Architecture: RESTful API with React SPA frontend
+
+**Key Findings:**
+- Authentication infrastructure needs to be built from scratch
+- Security considerations for JWT token management
+- Frontend state management for user sessions
+- Database schema updates required for user management
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Implement JWT-based authentication with refresh tokens
+- Use bcrypt for password hashing
+- Implement role-based access control (RBAC)
+- Add comprehensive security middleware
+
+**Next Steps:** Use @plan-feature to create detailed implementation plan
+```
+
+**2. Create Comprehensive Feature Plan**
+```bash
+# Command
+@plan-feature "User Authentication System"
+
+# Expected Agent Response (Project Manager)
+📋 **Feature Implementation Plan: User Authentication System**
+
+**Architecture Decisions:**
+- JWT access tokens (15min expiry) + refresh tokens (7 days)
+- bcrypt password hashing with salt rounds: 12
+- Role-based access control with user roles
+- Secure HTTP-only cookies for token storage
+- Rate limiting for authentication endpoints
+
+**Task Breakdown:**
+
+**Database Layer (Database Specialist - 6 hours)**
+1. Create user table with authentication fields (1 hour)
+2. Add user roles and permissions tables (1 hour)  
+3. Create refresh token storage table (1 hour)
+4. Add database indexes for performance (1 hour)
+5. Create user management stored procedures (2 hours)
+
+**Backend Implementation (Backend Engineer - 12 hours)**
+1. Set up JWT token generation and validation (2 hours)
+2. Implement password hashing service (1 hour)
+3. Create authentication middleware (2 hours)
+4. Build user registration endpoint (2 hours)
+5. Build login/logout endpoints (2 hours)
+6. Implement refresh token rotation (2 hours)
+7. Add rate limiting and security headers (1 hour)
+
+**Frontend Implementation (Frontend Architect - 10 hours)**
+1. Create authentication context and hooks (2 hours)
+2. Build login/register forms with validation (3 hours)
+3. Implement protected route components (2 hours)
+4. Add user profile management UI (2 hours)
+5. Handle token refresh and logout flows (1 hour)
+
+**Security Review (Security Specialist - 4 hours)**
+1. Review authentication flow security (1 hour)
+2. Validate JWT implementation (1 hour)
+3. Test for common vulnerabilities (1 hour)
+4. Security documentation and guidelines (1 hour)
+
+**Testing Strategy (Test Orchestrator - 8 hours)**
+1. Unit tests for authentication services (2 hours)
+2. Integration tests for auth endpoints (2 hours)
+3. E2E tests for complete auth flows (2 hours)
+4. Security testing and penetration tests (2 hours)
+
+**Total Estimated Effort:** 40 hours across 5 agents
+**Timeline:** 2 weeks with parallel development
+**Dependencies:** Database → Backend → Frontend → Testing
+```
+
+#### Phase 2: Systematic Implementation
+
+**3. Database Implementation**
+```bash
+# Database Specialist executes
+@execute
+
+# Implementation Process:
+✅ Created comprehensive user authentication schema
+✅ Added proper indexes for query performance  
+✅ Implemented secure password storage design
+✅ Created refresh token management tables
+✅ Added user role and permission system
+
+# Validation Results:
+- Migration executed successfully
+- All constraints and indexes created
+- Test data populated for development
+- Performance benchmarks within targets
+```
+
+**4. Backend Implementation**
+```bash
+# Backend Engineer executes  
+@execute
+
+# Implementation Process:
+✅ JWT service with secure token generation
+✅ bcrypt password hashing with proper salt rounds
+✅ Authentication middleware with role validation
+✅ Complete user registration with validation
+✅ Secure login/logout with refresh token rotation
+✅ Rate limiting and security headers implemented
+
+# Validation Results:
+- All endpoints tested with Postman
+- Security headers properly configured
+- Rate limiting working as expected
+- JWT tokens properly signed and validated
+```
+
+**5. Frontend Implementation**
+```bash
+# Frontend Architect executes
+@execute
+
+# Implementation Process:
+✅ Authentication context with TypeScript types
+✅ Login/register forms with Zod validation
+✅ Protected routes with role-based access
+✅ User profile management interface
+✅ Automatic token refresh handling
+
+# Validation Results:
+- All components render without errors
+- Form validation working correctly
+- Protected routes properly secured
+- User experience smooth and intuitive
+```
+
+#### Phase 3: Quality Assurance
+
+**6. Comprehensive Code Review**
+```bash
+# Test Orchestrator executes
+@code-review
+
+# Code Review Results:
+🔍 **Authentication System Code Review**
+
+**Security Assessment: ✅ PASS**
+- JWT implementation follows security best practices
+- Password hashing properly implemented with bcrypt
+- Rate limiting configured correctly
+- HTTPS-only cookies for token storage
+- No hardcoded secrets or credentials
+
+**Code Quality: ✅ PASS**  
+- TypeScript types properly defined
+- Error handling comprehensive
+- Code follows project conventions
+- Proper separation of concerns
+- Good test coverage (87%)
+
+**Performance: ✅ PASS**
+- Database queries optimized with indexes
+- JWT token size reasonable
+- Frontend bundle impact minimal
+- API response times within targets
+
+**Recommendations:**
+- Add password strength requirements
+- Implement account lockout after failed attempts
+- Add audit logging for authentication events
+- Consider implementing 2FA for admin users
+
+**Overall Assessment: APPROVED FOR DEPLOYMENT**
+```
+
+**7. Implementation Report**
+```bash
+# Test Orchestrator executes
+@execution-report
+
+# Implementation Report:
+📊 **Authentication System Implementation Report**
+
+**Planned vs Actual:**
+- Estimated: 40 hours | Actual: 38 hours ✅
+- Timeline: 2 weeks | Completed: 1.8 weeks ✅
+- All planned features implemented successfully
+
+**Quality Metrics:**
+- Test Coverage: 87% (target: 80%) ✅
+- Security Scan: 0 critical vulnerabilities ✅
+- Performance: All endpoints < 200ms ✅
+- Code Review: Approved with minor recommendations
+
+**Challenges Overcome:**
+- JWT refresh token rotation complexity
+- Frontend state management for auth context
+- Database migration coordination across environments
+
+**Key Learnings:**
+- Early security consultation prevented vulnerabilities
+- Parallel development reduced overall timeline
+- Comprehensive testing caught integration issues early
+
+**Recommendations for Future:**
+- Include security specialist from planning phase
+- Add more comprehensive E2E testing scenarios
+- Consider automated security scanning in CI/CD
+```
+
+#### Phase 4: Process Improvement
+
+**8. System Review and Process Analysis**
+```bash
+# Development Logger executes
+@system-review [authentication-plan.md] [auth-execution-report.md]
+
+# System Review Results:
+🔄 **Authentication System Process Review**
+
+**Overall Alignment Score: 9/10**
+
+**What Worked Exceptionally Well:**
+- Systematic planning with @plan-feature prevented scope creep
+- Agent coordination through Project Manager eliminated conflicts
+- Early security consultation prevented major vulnerabilities
+- Parallel development approach reduced timeline by 20%
+
+**Process Improvements Identified:**
+- Add security requirements to initial planning template
+- Include performance benchmarks in acceptance criteria
+- Create reusable authentication patterns for future features
+- Establish security testing automation in CI/CD
+
+**Recommended Updates:**
+- Update plan-feature.md to include security consultation step
+- Add authentication patterns to project steering documents
+- Create security testing checklist for Test Orchestrator
+- Document JWT implementation patterns for reuse
+
+**Key Success Factors:**
+- Comprehensive upfront planning
+- Clear agent role definitions
+- Systematic quality gates
+- Continuous documentation and learning
+```
+
+### Success Metrics Achieved
+
+**Development Velocity:**
+- ✅ Feature completed 10% ahead of schedule
+- ✅ Zero major rework required
+- ✅ All acceptance criteria met
+
+**Quality Metrics:**
+- ✅ 87% test coverage (exceeded 80% target)
+- ✅ Zero security vulnerabilities
+- ✅ All performance benchmarks met
+- ✅ Code review passed on first attempt
+
+**Process Effectiveness:**
+- ✅ Perfect agent coordination with no conflicts
+- ✅ Comprehensive documentation generated
+- ✅ Process improvements identified and documented
+- ✅ Reusable patterns created for future use
+
+---
+
+## Example 2: Emergency Security Fix
+
+### Scenario Setup
+- **Issue**: Critical SQL injection vulnerability discovered
+- **Severity**: High - affects user data security
+- **Timeline**: Must be fixed within 24 hours
+- **GitHub Issue**: #247
+
+### Emergency Response Implementation
+
+#### Phase 1: Root Cause Analysis
+
+**1. Immediate Security Assessment**
+```bash
+# Security Specialist executes
+@rca 247
+
+# Root Cause Analysis Results:
+🚨 **Security RCA: SQL Injection Vulnerability #247**
+
+**Issue Summary:**
+- GitHub Issue: #247
+- Severity: HIGH
+- Affected Component: User search functionality
+- Discovery: Security audit found unsanitized input
+
+**Root Cause Analysis:**
+- Location: backend/src/routes/users.ts:45
+- Issue: Direct string concatenation in SQL query
+- Vulnerable Code: `SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '${searchTerm}'`
+- Impact: Full database access possible through injection
+
+**Affected Systems:**
+- User search API endpoint
+- Potentially all user data accessible
+- Admin functions could be compromised
+
+**Proposed Fix Strategy:**
+1. Replace string concatenation with parameterized queries
+2. Add input validation and sanitization
+3. Implement query result limiting
+4. Add security logging for search operations
+5. Update all similar patterns in codebase
+
+**Testing Requirements:**
+- SQL injection penetration testing
+- Input validation testing with malicious payloads
+- Performance testing with parameterized queries
+- Security regression testing
+
+**Timeline:** 6 hours for complete fix and validation
+```
+
+#### Phase 2: Fix Implementation
+
+**2. Systematic Security Fix**
+```bash
+# Security Specialist executes
+@implement-fix 247
+
+# Fix Implementation Results:
+🔧 **Security Fix Implementation: Issue #247**
+
+**Changes Made:**
+
+**File: backend/src/routes/users.ts**
+- Replaced string concatenation with Prisma parameterized queries
+- Added Zod input validation for search parameters
+- Implemented query result limiting (max 100 results)
+- Added security logging for all search operations
+
+**File: backend/src/middleware/validation.ts**
+- Created reusable input sanitization middleware
+- Added SQL injection pattern detection
+- Implemented rate limiting for search endpoints
+
+**File: backend/src/services/auditService.ts**
+- Added security event logging
+- Implemented suspicious activity detection
+- Created audit trail for all database queries
+
+**Testing Results:**
+✅ SQL injection tests: All blocked successfully
+✅ Input validation: Malicious payloads rejected
+✅ Performance: Query time improved by 15%
+✅ Security scan: Zero vulnerabilities detected
+
+**Deployment Validation:**
+- Staging environment: All tests passing
+- Security penetration test: No vulnerabilities found
+- Performance benchmarks: Within acceptable limits
+- Rollback plan: Prepared and tested
+
+**Ready for Production Deployment**
+```
+
+#### Phase 3: Quality Validation
+
+**3. Emergency Code Review**
+```bash
+# Test Orchestrator executes
+@code-review
+
+# Emergency Code Review Results:
+🔍 **Emergency Security Fix Code Review**
+
+**Security Assessment: ✅ CRITICAL PASS**
+- SQL injection vulnerability completely eliminated
+- Input validation comprehensive and effective
+- Parameterized queries properly implemented
+- Security logging captures all relevant events
+- No new vulnerabilities introduced
+
+**Code Quality: ✅ PASS**
+- Fix follows established patterns
+- Error handling maintained
+- Performance not degraded
+- Proper TypeScript types maintained
+
+**Testing Coverage: ✅ PASS**
+- Security tests cover all attack vectors
+- Regression tests ensure no functionality broken
+- Performance tests validate query optimization
+- Integration tests confirm end-to-end security
+
+**Deployment Readiness: ✅ APPROVED**
+- All quality gates passed
+- Security validation complete
+- Performance benchmarks met
+- Rollback procedures tested
+
+**Recommendation: IMMEDIATE DEPLOYMENT APPROVED**
+```
+
+### Emergency Response Success
+
+**Response Time:**
+- ✅ Issue identified to fix deployed: 8 hours
+- ✅ Target 24 hours: Exceeded by 16 hours
+- ✅ Zero downtime during fix implementation
+
+**Security Outcome:**
+- ✅ Vulnerability completely eliminated
+- ✅ No data breach occurred
+- ✅ Enhanced security monitoring implemented
+- ✅ Prevention measures added for similar issues
+
+**Process Effectiveness:**
+- ✅ Systematic RCA prevented incomplete fixes
+- ✅ Agent coordination ensured comprehensive solution
+- ✅ Quality gates maintained even under pressure
+- ✅ Documentation complete for future reference
+
+---
+
+## Example 3: Hackathon Project Evaluation
+
+### Scenario Setup
+- **Project**: Complete TaskFlow application
+- **Purpose**: Hackathon submission evaluation
+- **Criteria**: 5 judging categories, 100 points total
+- **Timeline**: Final evaluation before submission
+
+### Comprehensive Project Evaluation
+
+**1. Complete Project Assessment**
+```bash
+# Test Orchestrator executes
+@code-review-hackathon
+
+# Hackathon Evaluation Results:
+🏆 **TaskFlow Application - Hackathon Submission Review**
+
+**Overall Score: 87/100**
+
+**Application Quality (35/40 points)**
+- Functionality & Completeness (14/15): Feature-complete with minor polish needed
+- Real-World Value (14/15): Solves genuine productivity problem effectively  
+- Code Quality (7/10): Good architecture, some refactoring opportunities
+
+**Kiro CLI Usage (18/20 points)**
+- Effective Use of Features (9/10): Excellent agent coordination and workflow
+- Custom Commands Quality (6/7): Well-designed prompts and automation
+- Workflow Innovation (3/3): Creative use of agent collaboration patterns
+
+**Documentation (17/20 points)**
+- Completeness (8/9): All required documentation present
+- Clarity (6/7): Clear instructions and explanations
+- Process Transparency (3/4): Good development process visibility
+
+**Innovation (12/15 points)**
+- Uniqueness (6/8): Novel approach to task management
+- Creative Problem-Solving (6/7): Innovative agent workflow integration
+
+**Presentation (5/5 points)**
+- Demo Video (3/3): Clear, engaging demonstration
+- README (2/2): Excellent setup instructions and overview
+
+**Strengths:**
+- Exceptional use of Kiro CLI agent team
+- Comprehensive documentation and process transparency
+- Innovative workflow patterns that could benefit other developers
+- High-quality implementation with good security practices
+
+**Areas for Improvement:**
+- Code refactoring for better maintainability
+- Additional error handling in edge cases
+- More comprehensive testing coverage
+- Enhanced UI/UX polish
+
+**Hackathon Readiness: READY FOR SUBMISSION**
+**Competitive Position: STRONG (Top 25% likely)**
+```
+
+**2. Final Documentation Review**
+```bash
+# Project Manager executes
+@create-prd "TaskFlow Application - Complete Specification"
+
+# Product Requirements Document Generated:
+📋 **TaskFlow Application - Product Requirements Document**
+
+**Product Overview:**
+- Purpose: Collaborative task management with AI agent assistance
+- Target Users: Development teams and project managers
+- Key Value: Systematic workflow with quality assurance
+
+**Feature Specifications:**
+- User authentication with JWT tokens
+- Task creation, assignment, and tracking
+- Agent-assisted development workflows
+- Real-time collaboration features
+- Comprehensive reporting and analytics
+
+**Technical Architecture:**
+- Frontend: React/TypeScript with Redux Toolkit
+- Backend: Node.js/Express with TypeScript
+- Database: PostgreSQL with Prisma ORM
+- Authentication: JWT with refresh token rotation
+- Testing: Jest, React Testing Library, Playwright
+
+**Quality Standards:**
+- 80%+ test coverage achieved (87% actual)
+- Zero critical security vulnerabilities
+- Sub-200ms API response times
+- WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility compliance
+
+**Success Criteria:**
+✅ All planned features implemented
+✅ Quality gates passed
+✅ Security validation complete
+✅ Performance benchmarks met
+✅ Documentation comprehensive
+✅ Hackathon submission ready
+```
+
+### Hackathon Submission Success
+
+**Evaluation Results:**
+- ✅ Score: 87/100 (Excellent)
+- ✅ All documentation complete and high-quality
+- ✅ Innovative use of Kiro CLI demonstrated
+- ✅ Strong competitive position for judging
+
+**Key Success Factors:**
+- ✅ Systematic development approach with agent coordination
+- ✅ Comprehensive quality assurance throughout development
+- ✅ Excellent documentation and process transparency
+- ✅ Creative workflow innovation that showcases Kiro CLI capabilities
+
+---
+
+## Key Takeaways from Examples
+
+### 🎯 Success Patterns
+
+**1. Always Start with Context**
+- Use `@prime` to establish comprehensive project understanding
+- Ensures all agents work from shared knowledge base
+
+**2. Plan Before Implementation**
+- `@plan-feature` prevents scope creep and coordination issues
+- Detailed planning reduces implementation time and rework
+
+**3. Maintain Quality Gates**
+- `@code-review` catches issues before they reach production
+- Systematic quality assurance prevents technical debt
+
+**4. Document Everything**
+- `@execution-report` captures implementation insights
+- `@system-review` drives continuous process improvement
+
+**5. Learn and Improve**
+- Regular process analysis identifies optimization opportunities
+- Systematic approach to workflow refinement
+
+### 🚀 Efficiency Multipliers
+
+**Agent Coordination:**
+- Project Manager as central coordinator eliminates conflicts
+- Clear handoff protocols ensure smooth collaboration
+
+**Quality Automation:**
+- Integrated quality gates prevent issues from propagating
+- Systematic testing and validation reduce manual effort
+
+**Knowledge Capture:**
+- Comprehensive documentation enables knowledge reuse
+- Process insights drive continuous improvement
+
+**Workflow Standardization:**
+- Consistent prompt usage creates predictable outcomes
+- Standardized processes reduce cognitive load and errors
+
+These examples demonstrate how the integrated agent-prompt system creates a systematic, quality-driven development approach that scales from individual features to complete applications.