invos 1.0.0

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/brand-book-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+# Brand Book Quality Checklist
+
+Final validation for brand guidelines document.
+
+## Completeness
+
+- [ ] Brand story/purpose section
+- [ ] Logo usage (full rules + DON'Ts)
+- [ ] Color specifications (all formats)
+- [ ] Typography specifications (hierarchy)
+- [ ] Imagery/photography style
+- [ ] Iconography guidelines
+- [ ] Layout/grid system
+- [ ] Voice & tone guide
+- [ ] Digital guidelines (responsive, dark mode)
+
+## Quality
+
+- [ ] Every color has HEX, RGB, CMYK, and Pantone
+- [ ] Logo clear space is measured in logo units (not pixels)
+- [ ] Minimum size tested on real devices
+- [ ] Typography tested for readability at all sizes
+- [ ] WCAG AA contrast verified for all text/background combos
+- [ ] Real examples shown (not just specifications)
+
+## Usability
+
+- [ ] A designer who's never seen the brand can use this guide
+- [ ] An engineer can implement the design system from this guide
+- [ ] Do's and Don'ts are visually clear
+- [ ] File is searchable (good headings, table of contents)

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/brand-launch-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+# Brand Launch Checklist
+
+Final validation before brand goes live.
+
+## Strategy Layer
+
+- [ ] Onliness statement finalized
+- [ ] Brand values documented and shared internally
+- [ ] Brand archetype defined
+- [ ] Positioning statement approved
+
+## Verbal Layer
+
+- [ ] Brand name trademark filed/cleared
+- [ ] Domain secured
+- [ ] Social media handles secured
+- [ ] Tagline finalized
+- [ ] Brand voice guide complete
+
+## Visual Layer
+
+- [ ] Logo finalized (all variations)
+- [ ] Brand guidelines distributed
+- [ ] Color system implemented in code/design tokens
+- [ ] Typography loaded and configured
+- [ ] Favicon and social avatars deployed
+
+## Experience Layer
+
+- [ ] Website updated with new brand
+- [ ] Product/app updated
+- [ ] Email templates updated
+- [ ] Social media profiles updated
+- [ ] Marketing materials updated
+- [ ] Packaging updated (if physical)
+- [ ] Business cards/stationery (if applicable)
+
+## Movement Layer
+
+- [ ] Brand narrative written (manifesto)
+- [ ] Shared enemy articulated
+- [ ] Launch story prepared
+- [ ] Internal team briefed on brand
+- [ ] Brand champions identified
+
+## Technical
+
+- [ ] Design tokens generated
+- [ ] CSS/theme files updated
+- [ ] SEO (title tags, meta descriptions) updated
+- [ ] Open Graph / social sharing cards configured
+- [ ] Analytics tracking brand mentions configured

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/brand-strategy-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# Brand Strategy Checklist
+
+Use after Phase 1 (DIAGNOSE) to verify brand strategy completeness.
+
+## Foundation
+
+- [ ] **Onliness Statement** defined: "Our brand is the only ___ that ___"
+- [ ] Onliness does NOT contain "best," "leading," or superlatives
+- [ ] Onliness is TRUE and PROVABLE (not aspirational)
+- [ ] **Brand Purpose** articulated: Why does this brand exist?
+- [ ] Purpose goes beyond "make money" — addresses a human need
+
+## Values & Personality
+
+- [ ] **Brand Values** defined (3-5 values)
+- [ ] Values are SPECIFIC (not "innovation, quality, trust")
+- [ ] Values could guide a hiring/firing decision
+- [ ] **Brand Personality** defined (3-5 traits)
+- [ ] **Brand Archetype** selected (primary + optional secondary)
+- [ ] Archetype has documented rationale
+
+## Brand Ladder
+
+- [ ] **Features** level complete (what it does)
+- [ ] **Benefits** level complete (what customers get)
+- [ ] **Values** level complete (what the brand stands for)
+- [ ] **Identity** level complete (how customers feel about themselves)
+
+## Charismatic Brand Test
+
+- [ ] Score calculated (5 criteria × 10 points = 50 max)
+- [ ] Score documented with rationale per criterion
+- [ ] If score < 30: strategy needs strengthening
+
+## Brand Gap
+
+- [ ] 5 Disciplines scored (Differentiate, Collaborate, Innovate, Validate, Cultivate)
+- [ ] Gaps identified with specific recommendations
+- [ ] Priority discipline for improvement identified
+
+## Ready for Next Phase?
+
+- [ ] All sections above are complete
+- [ ] Strategy is clear enough for a non-expert to understand
+- [ ] Strategy provides clear direction for positioning (Phase 2)

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/naming-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Naming Checklist
+
+Use after Phase 3 (NAME) to verify naming completeness.
+
+## Process
+
+- [ ] Creative brief completed
+- [ ] 50+ name candidates generated
+- [ ] 8 naming techniques used (associations, metaphors, compounds, portmanteaus, foreign, mythology, imagery, sound)
+
+## SMILE Test (Selected Name)
+
+- [ ] **S**uggestive — Evokes something about the brand (score ≥ 4/5)
+- [ ] **M**emorable — Easy to recall after one hearing (score ≥ 4/5)
+- [ ] **I**magery — Triggers a visual/mental picture (score ≥ 3/5)
+- [ ] **L**egs — Has extension potential for taglines, sub-brands (score ≥ 3/5)
+- [ ] **E**motional — Evokes a feeling, not just information (score ≥ 3/5)
+- [ ] Total SMILE score ≥ 18/25
+
+## SCRATCH Test (Selected Name)
+
+- [ ] NOT **S**pelling-challenged (easy to spell)
+- [ ] NOT a **C**opycat (distinct from competitors)
+- [ ] NOT **R**estrictive (allows future growth)
+- [ ] NOT **A**nnoying (no forced puns or groan-worthy wordplay)
+- [ ] NOT **T**ame (not bland or forgettable)
+- [ ] NOT **C**urse of Knowledge (outsiders understand it)
+- [ ] NOT **H**ard to pronounce (passes the radio test)
+
+## Practical
+
+- [ ] Domain availability checked
+- [ ] Social media handles availability checked
+- [ ] Trademark preliminary search done
+- [ ] Name works internationally (no negative connotations)
+- [ ] Name read aloud sounds good
+
+## Tagline
+
+- [ ] At least 3 tagline options created
+- [ ] Winning tagline is 7 words or fewer
+- [ ] Tagline passes the t-shirt test
+- [ ] Tagline works without the brand name
+
+## Ready for Next Phase?
+
+- [ ] Name selected with full SMILE/SCRATCH documentation
+- [ ] Name is ready for visual identity design (Phase 4)

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/positioning-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Positioning Checklist
+
+Use after Phase 2 (POSITION) to verify positioning completeness.
+
+## Competitive Context
+
+- [ ] **Competitive alternatives** listed (real companies, not categories)
+- [ ] At least 3 alternatives identified
+- [ ] "Status quo" / "do nothing" option considered
+- [ ] Strengths and weaknesses of each alternative documented
+
+## Differentiation
+
+- [ ] **Unique attributes** listed (facts, not opinions)
+- [ ] Each attribute is VERIFIABLE
+- [ ] Attributes are mapped to customer VALUE
+- [ ] VALUE is described in CUSTOMER language (not company language)
+- [ ] PROOF exists for each value claim
+
+## Target Customer
+
+- [ ] Target defined by CHARACTERISTICS (not demographics)
+- [ ] Characteristics explain WHY they care about the value
+- [ ] Target is specific enough to find them
+- [ ] Target is NOT "everyone"
+
+## Market Category
+
+- [ ] Category strategy selected: Head-to-head / Big fish small pond / New category
+- [ ] Rationale documented for category choice
+- [ ] Category makes the brand's value OBVIOUS
+
+## Positioning Statement
+
+- [ ] One-sentence positioning statement written
+- [ ] Statement follows template: "For [who] who [need], [brand] is a [category] that [value] unlike [alternatives] because [proof]"
+- [ ] Statement is clear on first reading (no re-reads needed)
+- [ ] Statement does NOT use "innovative," "cutting-edge," or vague superlatives
+
+## One-Word Test
+
+- [ ] Brand can be described in ONE word
+- [ ] That word is OWNABLE (no competitor owns it in this market)
+
+## Ready for Next Phase?
+
+- [ ] Positioning is clear enough to inform naming (Phase 3)
+- [ ] A salesperson could explain the positioning in 30 seconds

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/smoke-tests.md

@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+# Brand Squad — Smoke Tests
+
+## Purpose
+
+3 behavioral smoke tests per agent (21 total). Tests validate **behavior**, not content.
+Each test: scenario in → expected behavior out. PASS = agent applies its documented framework correctly.
+
+Reference: Quality Gate SC_AGT_001
+
+---
+
+## brand-chief (Orchestrator, Tier 0)
+
+### ST-BC-1: Sequence Enforcement (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User says "I want a logo for my startup"
+- **Expected:** Routes to @marty-neumeier first for brand strategy, NOT directly to @sagi-haviv. Explains: "Strategy before identity — we need to define what the brand IS before designing how it looks."
+- **Pass if:** Enforces Strategy → Positioning → Naming → Identity sequence
+- **Fail if:** Routes directly to logo/identity without strategy phase
+
+### ST-BC-2: Phase Skip Veto (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Skip strategy, I already know my brand. Go straight to naming."
+- **Expected:** Asks for evidence of completed strategy (onliness statement, brand values). If none provided, VETO: "Cannot skip strategy phase — it's the foundation for everything that follows."
+- **Pass if:** Requires strategy artifacts before allowing skip
+- **Fail if:** Accepts skip without verification
+
+### ST-BC-3: Multi-Agent Routing (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "My positioning is weak and my logo looks dated"
+- **Expected:** Routes positioning to @april-dunford AND logo to @sagi-haviv (not the same agent). Identifies correct sequence: fix positioning first, then evaluate logo alignment.
+- **Pass if:** Routes to correct specialists in correct order
+- **Fail if:** Tries to handle both itself or routes in wrong order
+
+---
+
+## marty-neumeier (Brand Strategist, Tier 0)
+
+### ST-MN-1: Brand Gap Diagnosis (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User describes a SaaS tool: "We help teams manage projects. Our competitors are Asana, Monday, Trello."
+- **Expected:** Runs Brand Gap analysis using 5 disciplines (Differentiate, Collaborate, Innovate, Validate, Cultivate). Scores each 1-10. Identifies the gap between what the company says and what customers feel. Builds onliness statement.
+- **Pass if:** Uses Brand Gap framework, produces onliness statement
+- **Fail if:** Skips to visual identity, uses generic SWOT, or produces vague strategy
+
+### ST-MN-2: Onliness Veto (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User proposes onliness: "We are the best project management tool on the market"
+- **Expected:** VETO — "best" is a superlative, not a differentiator. Coaches user: "Fill in: 'Our brand is the ONLY ___ that ___.' Must be TRUE and PROVABLE. No superlatives."
+- **Pass if:** Rejects superlatives, guides to specific differentiator
+- **Fail if:** Accepts "best" or "leading" as valid onliness
+
+### ST-MN-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Great strategy. Now design my logo."
+- **Expected:** Hands off to @sagi-haviv (logo) and @michael-johnson (visual identity). Says something like: "Strategy is done. Logo design is @sagi-haviv's domain — I'll hand off the brand strategy document."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to correct agent with handoff deliverable
+- **Fail if:** Attempts to design logo or discuss visual elements
+
+---
+
+## april-dunford (Positioning Master, Tier 1)
+
+### ST-AD-1: Competitive Alternatives First (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Help me position my product. We're an AI writing assistant."
+- **Expected:** Starts with Step 1: "What would your customers use if you didn't exist?" Maps ALL alternatives (Jasper, ChatGPT, hiring a copywriter, doing nothing). Does NOT start with mission statement or value proposition.
+- **Pass if:** Starts with competitive alternatives, not mission/vision
+- **Fail if:** Starts with "What's your mission?" or "What's your value prop?"
+
+### ST-AD-2: Target Rejection (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Our target audience is everyone who writes content"
+- **Expected:** VETO — "Everyone" is not a target. Coaches: "What makes someone MOST LIKELY to care about your differentiated value? Give me characteristics, not demographics."
+- **Pass if:** Rejects "everyone", asks for behavioral characteristics
+- **Fail if:** Accepts broad target without challenge
+
+### ST-AD-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Now that positioning is done, what should we name the product?"
+- **Expected:** Routes to @alexandra-watkins. "Naming is @alexandra-watkins's domain. I'll pass the positioning canvas so the name encodes our competitive differentiation."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to naming specialist with positioning deliverable
+- **Fail if:** Attempts to generate brand names
+
+---
+
+## alexandra-watkins (Naming Alchemist, Tier 1)
+
+### ST-AW-1: SMILE/SCRATCH Application (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User asks to evaluate the name "Xtreme Fitnezz" for a premium fitness brand
+- **Expected:** Runs SMILE test (scores low on Suggestive, Imagery) AND SCRATCH test (FAILS: Spelling-challenged, Annoying). Recommends elimination with specific rationale per criterion.
+- **Pass if:** Applies both SMILE and SCRATCH with specific scores/reasons
+- **Fail if:** Gives generic "it's not great" without framework application
+
+### ST-AW-2: Volume Requirement (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User says "I came up with 5 name ideas. Let's pick one."
+- **Expected:** Pushes for more: "5 is not enough exploration. The naming process requires 50+ candidates using 8 techniques (word associations, metaphors, compounds, portmanteaus, foreign words, mythology, evocative imagery, sound symbolism). The best names come from volume."
+- **Pass if:** Insists on 50+ candidates before shortlisting
+- **Fail if:** Accepts 5 candidates and evaluates them directly
+
+### ST-AW-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Love the name. Now pick the colors for it."
+- **Expected:** Routes to @michael-johnson. "Color systems are @michael-johnson's domain. I'll pass the selected name so the visual identity matches its personality."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to visual identity specialist
+- **Fail if:** Suggests colors or visual direction
+
+---
+
+## michael-johnson (Identity Architect, Tier 1)
+
+### ST-MJ-1: Investigation First (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User says "I need a color palette. My brand is about trust and innovation."
+- **Expected:** Follows 5.5 Steps — starts with INVESTIGATION (reviews brand strategy, positioning, name, competitor identities) before proposing any colors. Maps color choices to brand personality using color-psychology.md.
+- **Pass if:** Investigates context before proposing, maps colors to psychology
+- **Fail if:** Immediately suggests "blue for trust" without investigation
+
+### ST-MJ-2: Accessibility Veto (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User wants light yellow text (#FFEB3B) on white background (#FFFFFF)
+- **Expected:** VETO — fails WCAG AA contrast. "This combination has a contrast ratio of ~1.07:1. WCAG AA requires 4.5:1 minimum. I cannot approve an identity system that fails accessibility."
+- **Pass if:** Rejects on accessibility grounds with specific ratio
+- **Fail if:** Accepts the color combination
+
+### ST-MJ-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Help me write our brand manifesto"
+- **Expected:** Routes to @emily-heyward. "Brand narratives and manifestos are @emily-heyward's domain — the Obsessed framework. I handle visual identity systems."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to brand builder specialist
+- **Fail if:** Writes manifesto or brand narrative
+
+---
+
+## sagi-haviv (Logo Master, Tier 1)
+
+### ST-SH-1: 5-Pillar Evaluation (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User presents a detailed, gradient-heavy logo with 12 elements for a financial services company
+- **Expected:** Applies 5-pillar evaluation: Appropriateness (finance context), Distinctiveness, Simplicity (likely fails — too many elements), Memorability (likely fails — can't sketch from memory), Timelessness (gradients age poorly). Runs simplicity test (10-word description, sketch from memory, 16px recognition).
+- **Pass if:** Applies all 5 pillars + simplicity test with specific scores
+- **Fail if:** Gives aesthetic opinion without framework
+
+### ST-SH-2: Simplicity Enforcement (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User says "I want my logo to include a globe, a handshake, a lightbulb, and our full company name in script font"
+- **Expected:** Flags complexity: "A logo with 4+ elements fails the simplicity test. Can you describe it in 10 words? Can you sketch it from memory? The strongest logos are reducible to a single idea."
+- **Pass if:** Challenges complexity, advocates for reduction
+- **Fail if:** Accepts complex multi-element brief without pushback
+
+### ST-SH-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Now create the full brand guidelines with typography and color specs"
+- **Expected:** Routes to @michael-johnson. "Full brand guidelines are @michael-johnson's domain. I handle logo design and evaluation. He'll integrate the logo into a comprehensive identity system."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to identity architect
+- **Fail if:** Creates typography specs or color systems
+
+---
+
+## emily-heyward (Brand Builder, Tier 2)
+
+### ST-EH-1: Brand Soul Canvas (Domain Knowledge)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Help me build a brand movement for our sustainable fashion company"
+- **Expected:** Completes Brand Soul Canvas (7 blocks): Founding Myth, The Why, Shared Enemy, Sacred Values, Rituals, Lexicon, Brand Tension. Identifies emotional hook. Builds narrative with tension→belief→resolution structure.
+- **Pass if:** Fills all 7 Brand Soul Canvas blocks, identifies emotional hook
+- **Fail if:** Skips canvas blocks or produces feature-first narrative
+
+### ST-EH-2: Feature-First Veto (Decision Making)
+- **Scenario:** User's brand narrative draft: "We use organic cotton and have the lowest carbon footprint in the industry. Our supply chain is 100% traceable."
+- **Expected:** VETO — "This is feature-first, not emotion-first. The narrative must lead with the TENSION: 'The fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon emissions and most brands pretend it's fine.' THEN the belief: 'We believe clothing should never cost the earth.' THEN the features as proof."
+- **Pass if:** Rejects feature-first, restructures to emotion-first
+- **Fail if:** Accepts feature-list as brand narrative
+
+### ST-EH-3: Scope Boundary (Boundary Awareness)
+- **Scenario:** User says "Help me figure out our competitive positioning against Patagonia and Everlane"
+- **Expected:** Routes to @april-dunford. "Competitive positioning is @april-dunford's domain — the Obviously Awesome canvas. I handle brand activation and movement architecture once positioning is defined."
+- **Pass if:** Routes to positioning specialist
+- **Fail if:** Conducts competitive positioning analysis
+
+---
+
+## How to Run Smoke Tests
+
+1. Activate the agent: `/brand:{agent-id}`
+2. Present each scenario exactly as written
+3. Compare response against expected behavior
+4. Score: PASS / FAIL per test
+5. Agent passes SC_AGT_001 if 3/3 tests PASS
+
+## Verdicts
+
+| Result | Meaning | Action |
+|--------|---------|--------|
+| 3/3 PASS | Agent meets quality gate | Approved |
+| 2/3 PASS | Minor gap | Fix failing test area, re-run |
+| 1/3 or 0/3 PASS | Agent needs rework | Investigate root cause in agent definition |

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/checklists/visual-identity-checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# Visual Identity Checklist
+
+Use after Phase 4 (IDENTIFY) to verify visual identity completeness.
+
+## Logo
+
+- [ ] Primary logo designed
+- [ ] Logo variations exist (horizontal, stacked, icon-only)
+- [ ] Favicon version (16x16, 32x32)
+- [ ] Monochrome versions (black, white, reversed)
+- [ ] Clear space rules defined
+- [ ] Minimum size specified
+- [ ] Logo DON'Ts documented (what NOT to do)
+- [ ] Simplicity test: 5/5 questions pass
+- [ ] 5-Pillar evaluation: all ≥ 7/10
+
+## Color System
+
+- [ ] Primary colors defined (1-2)
+- [ ] Secondary colors defined (2-3)
+- [ ] Neutral palette defined (2-3)
+- [ ] Semantic colors defined (success, error, warning, info)
+- [ ] All colors have HEX, RGB, HSL codes
+- [ ] CMYK values for print
+- [ ] Colors map to brand personality (rationale documented)
+- [ ] WCAG AA contrast verified (4.5:1 minimum)
+- [ ] Color differentiation from top 3 competitors
+
+## Typography
+
+- [ ] Brand typeface selected with rationale
+- [ ] UI typeface selected with rationale
+- [ ] Type hierarchy defined (H1-H6, body, caption, label)
+- [ ] Line height and spacing specified
+- [ ] Font weights listed for each use case
+
+## Imagery
+
+- [ ] Photography style defined
+- [ ] Illustration style defined (if applicable)
+- [ ] Iconography guidelines
+- [ ] Image treatment rules (filters, overlays)
+
+## Layout
+
+- [ ] Grid system defined
+- [ ] Spacing system defined (base unit)
+- [ ] White space philosophy documented
+
+## Brand Guidelines Document
+
+- [ ] All 8 sections complete
+- [ ] Do's and Don'ts for each element
+- [ ] Digital-specific guidelines (responsive, dark mode)
+- [ ] Shared with all stakeholders
+
+## Ready for Next Phase?
+
+- [ ] Visual identity is complete and documented
+- [ ] Brand guidelines document is comprehensive
+- [ ] Ready for brand activation (Phase 5)

package/kit/.agents/squads/brand/config.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+pack:
+  name: brand
+  version: 1.0.0
+  short-title: Brand Squad
+  description: >-
+    Elite brand building squad powered by documented frameworks from the world's
+    greatest branding minds. Covers brand strategy, positioning, naming, visual
+    identity, logo design, brand building, and movement architecture. Every agent
+    is cloned from a real expert with skin in the game and battle-tested methodology.
+  author: Synkra AIOX
+  icon: "💎"
+  slashPrefix: brand
+
+# Pattern Library
+pattern_library:
+  prefix: BR
+  naming_convention:
+    format: "{PREFIX}-{CATEGORY}-{NUMBER}"
+    example: "BR-TP-001"
+  categories:
+    - id: TP
+      name: "Task Patterns"
+      description: "Patterns for brand task structure and execution"
+    - id: EP
+      name: "Executor Patterns"
+      description: "Patterns for brand executor types and selection"
+    - id: PP
+      name: "Process Patterns"
+      description: "Patterns for brand workflow processes"
+    - id: IP
+      name: "Integration Patterns"
+      description: "Patterns for external integrations"
+    - id: BP
+      name: "Brand Patterns"
+      description: "Reusable brand strategy and identity patterns"
+    - id: DP
+      name: "Documentation Patterns"
+      description: "Patterns for brand documentation and guidelines"
+  patterns: []
+
+# Task Standards
+task_standards:
+  enforce_anatomy: true
+  validator: "BR-TP-001"
+  required_fields:
+    - task_name
+    - status
+    - responsible_executor
+    - execution_type
+    - input
+    - output
+    - action_items
+    - acceptance_criteria
+  optional_fields:
+    - estimated_time
+    - dependencies
+    - templates
+    - quality_gate
+    - handoff
+
+# Executor Types
+executor_types:
+  human:
+    id: "BR-EP-001"
+    name: "Human Executor"
+    use_for:
+      - "Final brand approval"
+      - "Stakeholder presentations"
+      - "Creative direction override"
+  agent:
+    id: "BR-EP-002"
+    name: "Agent Executor (AI)"
+    use_for:
+      - "Brand strategy analysis"
+      - "Positioning exercises"
+      - "Name generation"
+      - "Brand audit"
+      - "Guidelines documentation"
+  hybrid:
+    id: "BR-EP-003"
+    name: "Hybrid Executor"
+    use_for:
+      - "Visual identity review"
+      - "Logo evaluation"
+      - "Brand book validation"
+  worker:
+    id: "BR-EP-004"
+    name: "Worker Executor"
+    use_for:
+      - "Color code conversion"
+      - "Typography specification export"
+      - "Design token generation"
+
+executor_selection:
+  requires_creativity: human
+  requires_judgment: [human, hybrid]
+  requires_speed: [agent, worker]
+  requires_consistency: worker
+  requires_validation: hybrid
+  requires_learning: agent
+
+# Workflow Configuration
+workflow_config:
+  checkpoint_policy: always_active
+  checkpoint_modes:
+    always_active: "Every checkpoint MUST pass"
+    skip_on_override: "Can skip with manual approval"
+    advisory: "Only alerts, doesn't block"
+  fail_fast: true
+  allow_manual_override: false
+
+# Agent Tiers
+tier_system:
+  tier_0:
+    name: "Diagnosis & Orchestration"
+    agents:
+      - brand-chief
+      - marty-neumeier
+  tier_1:
+    name: "Masters"
+    agents:
+      - april-dunford
+      - michael-johnson
+      - sagi-haviv
+      - alexandra-watkins
+  tier_2:
+    name: "Systematizers"
+    agents:
+      - emily-heyward
+
+# Squad Dependencies
+settings:
+  greeting: named
+  language: en
+  max_context_files: 5