@wentorai/research-plugins 1.0.0 → 1.2.0

package/skills/writing/polish/chinese-text-humanizer/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+---
+name: chinese-text-humanizer
+description: "Transform AI-generated Chinese text into natural academic writing style"
+metadata:
+  openclaw:
+    emoji: "✍️"
+    category: "writing"
+    subcategory: "polish"
+    keywords: ["chinese writing", "AI detection", "text humanization", "academic style", "natural language", "chinese academic"]
+    source: "https://clawhub.ai/anisafifi/chinese-humanizer"
+---
+
+# Chinese Academic Text Humanizer
+
+## Overview
+
+AI-generated Chinese academic text often exhibits detectable patterns: overly balanced sentence structures, formulaic transitions, predictable hedging, and unnaturally consistent register. This guide provides strategies to transform AI-assisted drafts into natural, human-sounding Chinese academic prose while maintaining scholarly rigor. Applicable to journal manuscripts, thesis chapters, and grant applications written in Chinese.
+
+## Common AI-Generated Chinese Text Patterns
+
+### Detectable Markers
+
+| Pattern | AI Tendency | Human Academic Style |
+|---------|-----------|---------------------|
+| **Sentence openings** | 重复使用 "本文"、"本研究"、"值得注意的是" | 变换主语：具体名词、被动句式、无主句 |
+| **Transitions** | 机械使用 "首先…其次…最后" | 自然承接：因果、转折、递进交替 |
+| **Hedging** | 每句都加 "可能"、"一定程度上" | 有选择地使用限定语，关键结论要果断 |
+| **Paragraph structure** | 总-分-总，每段等长 | 段落长短不一，论证节奏有变化 |
+| **Vocabulary** | 偏好"关键""重要""显著" | 用词精确：分辨"关键/核心/至关重要"的语境差异 |
+| **列举** | 大量并列三项 ("X、Y和Z") | 有时二项，有时四项，避免刻板的三项并列 |
+
+## Humanization Strategies
+
+### Strategy 1: Vary Sentence Structure
+
+```markdown
+AI 风格（机械均匀）：
+  "深度学习在自然语言处理中取得了显著进展。研究者提出了多种模型来解决文本分类问题。
+   这些方法在标准数据集上取得了良好效果。然而，实际应用中仍面临诸多挑战。"
+
+修改后（节奏变化）：
+  "深度学习正深刻改变自然语言处理的面貌——从文本分类到机器翻译，预训练模型已成为
+   事实上的标准范式。不过，标准数据集上的高分并不总能转化为实际场景中的可靠表现。
+   部署环境中的分布偏移、标注噪声以及计算资源限制，都使得从实验室到生产环境的过渡
+   远非一帆风顺。"
+
+改进点：
+  ✓ 长短句交替
+  ✓ 破折号引入补充说明
+  ✓ 具体化 "诸多挑战"
+  ✓ "远非一帆风顺" 比 "仍面临挑战" 更生动
+```
+
+### Strategy 2: Replace Formulaic Transitions
+
+| AI 公式化 | 替代方案 |
+|----------|---------|
+| 首先…其次…最后… | 删除序号词，用逻辑关系自然承接 |
+| 值得注意的是 | 直接陈述，或用 "尤其是"、"特别是" |
+| 综上所述 | "以上分析表明" 或直接给出结论 |
+| 总的来说 | "总体而言" 或省略，直接表述 |
+| 研究表明 | 具体引用："Li et al. (2024) 发现…" |
+| 具有重要意义 | 说清楚重要在哪里："这为X提供了Y" |
+
+### Strategy 3: Inject Disciplinary Voice
+
+```markdown
+AI（泛化的学术腔）：
+  "本研究采用混合方法研究设计，结合定量和定性数据分析，
+   以期全面了解该现象。"
+
+经济学风格：
+  "我们构建了一个双重差分模型，利用2016年政策冲击作为外生变量，
+   识别市场准入放宽对中小企业融资成本的因果效应。"
+
+社会学风格：
+  "通过对15位流动务工人员的深度访谈，本文试图理解制度性排斥如何
+   在日常生活实践中被体验和回应。"
+
+改进点：
+  ✓ 具体的方法名称（不是 "混合方法"）
+  ✓ 具体的研究对象（不是 "该现象"）
+  ✓ 学科特有术语（因果效应、外生变量、制度性排斥）
+```
+
+### Strategy 4: Authentic Chinese Academic Conventions
+
+```markdown
+中文学术写作的特有习惯（AI 常遗漏）：
+
+1. 四字格的适当使用（但不过度）：
+   ✓ "方兴未艾""不容忽视""有待商榷"
+   ✗ 不要每句都塞入四字格
+
+2. 引述惯例：
+   ✓ "正如张三 (2023) 所指出的，…"
+   ✓ "有学者认为…（李四，2024；王五，2023）"
+   ✗ AI 常写："研究表明…" 但不给出具体引用
+
+3. 数据呈现：
+   ✓ "回归结果（表3第(2)列）显示，处理组均值提高了12.3个百分点（p<0.01）"
+   ✗ AI 常写："结果显示变量之间存在显著正相关关系"（太模糊）
+
+4. 论文基金致谢：
+   ✓ 放在首页脚注，格式："本研究受国家自然科学基金项目（No. XXXXXXX）资助"
+```
+
+### Strategy 5: Paragraph-Level Restructuring
+
+```markdown
+AI 通常生成 "总-分-总" 结构的等长段落。修改策略：
+
+1. 合并过短的段落（少于3句的段落考虑合并）
+2. 拆分过长的段落（超过8句时寻找分割点）
+3. 删除重复表述（AI 喜欢在段首和段尾重复相同观点）
+4. 添加段间逻辑标记（"与此形成对照的是""这一发现的理论含义在于"）
+5. 允许段落长短不一（3句段和7句段交替出现更自然）
+```
+
+## Revision Checklist
+
+```markdown
+## 逐段检查清单
+
+□ 删除了所有 "本文"/"本研究" 的过度使用（每页不超过2次）
+□ 替换了公式化过渡词
+□ 检查了每个 "重要/显著/关键" 是否有具体说明
+□ 确保引用了具体文献（不是泛泛的 "研究表明"）
+□ 段落长度有变化（不是每段都5-6句）
+□ 句式有变化（长短句交替，主动被动穿插）
+□ 四字格使用适度（每段不超过1-2个）
+□ 数据引用精确（有表格编号、列号、数值）
+□ 读起来像你自己写的（而不是任何人都能写的通用文本）
+```
+
+## References
+
+- 中国社会科学院语言研究所 (2016). *现代汉语词典* (第7版). 商务印书馆.
+- 毕飞宇 (2017). *小说课*. 人民文学出版社. (关于汉语写作节奏的参考)
+- [中国知网写作规范](https://www.cnki.net/)

package/skills/writing/polish/conciseness-editing-guide/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,225 @@
+---
+name: conciseness-editing-guide
+description: "Eliminate wordiness and redundancy in academic prose for clarity"
+metadata:
+  openclaw:
+    emoji: "scissors"
+    category: "writing"
+    subcategory: "polish"
+    keywords: ["conciseness", "wordiness", "academic editing", "prose clarity", "redundancy", "word count reduction"]
+    source: "wentor-research-plugins"
+---
+
+# Conciseness Editing Guide
+
+A skill for systematically eliminating wordiness, redundancy, and unnecessary complexity in academic writing. Covers common verbosity patterns, sentence-level compression techniques, paragraph restructuring strategies, and methods for reducing word count while preserving meaning and nuance.
+
+## Why Conciseness Matters in Academia
+
+Academic papers face strict word or page limits. Reviewers read hundreds of papers and reward clarity. Verbose writing obscures arguments, frustrates readers, and often signals muddled thinking. A concise paper communicates more ideas per page, leaving room for additional analysis, examples, or discussion. Journals frequently reject manuscripts that exceed length limits, and reviewers regularly cite "needs tightening" as a criticism.
+
+## Common Wordiness Patterns
+
+### Expletive Constructions
+
+Expletive constructions begin sentences with "It is" or "There are" followed by a delayed subject. They add words without adding meaning.
+
+```
+Pattern: "It is/was... that/who..."
+
+Before: "It is well established that climate change affects
+         biodiversity in tropical regions."
+After:  "Climate change affects biodiversity in tropical regions
+         (Smith, 2019; Jones, 2020)."
+Saved:  5 words
+
+Before: "There are several factors that contribute to the
+         observed variance in student performance."
+After:  "Several factors contribute to the observed variance
+         in student performance."
+Saved:  2 words
+
+Before: "It was found that the treatment group showed a
+         significant improvement in test scores."
+After:  "The treatment group showed a significant improvement
+         in test scores."
+Saved:  4 words
+```
+
+### Nominalizations
+
+Nominalizations convert verbs into nouns, requiring additional supporting verbs and prepositions. They make prose heavy and indirect.
+
+```
+Pattern: Verb -> Noun + "of/for/in"
+
+Before: "We performed an investigation of the relationship
+         between temperature and reaction rate."
+After:  "We investigated the relationship between temperature
+         and reaction rate."
+Saved:  3 words
+
+Before: "The implementation of the algorithm resulted in an
+         improvement of processing speed."
+After:  "Implementing the algorithm improved processing speed."
+Saved:  6 words
+
+Before: "The utilization of machine learning for the
+         classification of cell types has increased."
+After:  "Using machine learning to classify cell types has
+         become more common."
+Saved:  3 words
+
+Common nominalizations to avoid:
+  - utilization -> use
+  - implementation -> implementing
+  - investigation -> investigating
+  - establishment -> establishing
+  - demonstration -> demonstrating
+  - facilitation -> facilitating
+```
+
+### Redundant Pairs and Phrases
+
+```
+Redundant pairs (drop one):
+  - "each and every" -> "each" or "every"
+  - "first and foremost" -> "first"
+  - "various and diverse" -> "various" or "diverse"
+  - "completely and totally" -> "completely" or "totally"
+
+Redundant modifiers:
+  - "past history" -> "history"
+  - "future plans" -> "plans"
+  - "end result" -> "result"
+  - "final outcome" -> "outcome"
+  - "basic fundamentals" -> "fundamentals"
+  - "advance planning" -> "planning"
+  - "true fact" -> "fact"
+  - "consensus of opinion" -> "consensus"
+```
+
+## Sentence-Level Compression Techniques
+
+### Prepositional Phrase Reduction
+
+Long chains of prepositional phrases ("of the", "in the", "for the") inflate word counts and reduce readability.
+
+```
+Before: "The analysis of the distribution of the data from
+         the experiment on the effects of temperature on
+         the growth rate of the bacteria showed..."
+After:  "Analyzing the experimental data on temperature's
+         effect on bacterial growth rate showed..."
+Saved:  10 words
+
+Strategy: Convert "of the X" to possessive or adjective form
+  - "the results of the experiment" -> "the experimental results"
+  - "the behavior of the system" -> "the system's behavior"
+  - "the members of the committee" -> "the committee members"
+```
+
+### Wordy Phrases to Concise Alternatives
+
+```
+Wordy                              Concise
+---------------------------------  ----------------
+"in order to"                      "to"
+"due to the fact that"             "because"
+"in spite of the fact that"        "although"
+"at the present time"              "currently" / "now"
+"a large number of"                "many"
+"a small number of"                "few"
+"in the event that"                "if"
+"has the ability to"               "can"
+"is able to"                       "can"
+"it is necessary that"             "must"
+"for the purpose of"               "to" / "for"
+"with regard to"                   "regarding" / "about"
+"in the vicinity of"               "near"
+"on a daily basis"                 "daily"
+"the majority of"                  "most"
+"a sufficient amount of"           "enough"
+"in close proximity to"            "near"
+"take into consideration"          "consider"
+"has an impact on"                 "affects"
+"conduct an analysis of"           "analyze"
+"make a decision"                  "decide"
+"give an indication of"            "indicate"
+"is in agreement with"             "agrees with"
+"on the basis of"                  "based on"
+```
+
+## Paragraph-Level Strategies
+
+### Eliminating Throat-Clearing
+
+Many paragraphs begin with one or two sentences that announce what the paragraph will say rather than saying it. Cut these.
+
+```
+Before: "In this section, we will now turn our attention to the
+         results of the statistical analysis. The results are
+         presented below and discussed in detail. Table 3 shows
+         the regression coefficients for Model 1."
+
+After:  "Table 3 shows the regression coefficients for Model 1."
+Saved:  27 words (the table speaks for itself)
+```
+
+### Merging Short Paragraphs
+
+Multiple short paragraphs covering the same point should be consolidated. Each paragraph should develop one idea fully.
+
+```
+Before:
+  "We used logistic regression.
+   The dependent variable was binary.
+   We included age, gender, and income as covariates.
+   The model was estimated using maximum likelihood."
+
+After:
+  "We estimated a logistic regression with a binary dependent
+   variable, including age, gender, and income as covariates,
+   using maximum likelihood estimation."
+```
+
+## Systematic Editing Workflow
+
+### The Three-Pass Method
+
+```
+Pass 1 - Word Level (search and replace):
+  1. Search for "in order to" -> replace with "to"
+  2. Search for "due to the fact" -> replace with "because"
+  3. Search for "it is" at sentence starts -> restructure
+  4. Search for "-tion of" -> consider converting to verb form
+  5. Search for "very", "really", "quite" -> delete or find precise word
+
+Pass 2 - Sentence Level (read each sentence):
+  1. Can any sentence be split or merged?
+  2. Does every clause add information?
+  3. Are there unnecessary qualifiers?
+  4. Can passive be converted to active (saving 1-2 words)?
+
+Pass 3 - Paragraph Level (read each paragraph):
+  1. Does the first sentence do real work?
+  2. Is anything repeated from the previous paragraph?
+  3. Can two paragraphs be merged?
+  4. Does the paragraph earn its place in the paper?
+```
+
+### Word Count Targets
+
+```
+Typical reductions achievable:
+  First draft -> Second draft: 15-25% reduction
+  Second draft -> Final: 5-10% reduction
+  Total achievable: 20-30% reduction without losing content
+
+If your paper is 8,000 words and the limit is 6,000:
+  You need a 25% reduction -- achievable with systematic editing.
+  Focus on the introduction and discussion first (most verbose).
+  Methods and results tend to be already concise.
+```
+
+By applying these techniques systematically, researchers can typically cut 20 to 30 percent of their word count without removing any substantive content, resulting in clearer, more impactful manuscripts that reviewers and readers appreciate.

package/skills/writing/polish/paper-polish-guide/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+---
+name: paper-polish-guide
+description: "Review and polish LaTeX research papers for clarity and style"
+metadata:
+  openclaw:
+    emoji: "💎"
+    category: "writing"
+    subcategory: "polish"
+    keywords: ["paper polishing", "academic editing", "LaTeX review", "writing quality", "style guide", "proofreading"]
+    source: "https://github.com/yzhao062/writing-style"
+---
+
+# Paper Polish Guide
+
+## Overview
+
+The difference between a good paper and a great paper often lies in the final polishing stage. After the scientific content is solid and the structure is sound, a thorough polish pass addresses clarity, conciseness, consistency, and correctness at the sentence and paragraph level. This is where awkward phrasing is smoothed, redundancies are eliminated, and the prose is tightened to convey ideas with maximum precision and minimum friction.
+
+This skill provides a systematic approach to polishing research papers, with a particular focus on LaTeX manuscripts. It covers common writing issues in academic papers, a multi-pass review strategy, specific patterns to search for and fix, and tools that can assist the process. The techniques apply across all academic disciplines but include LaTeX-specific advice for formatting and typographic polish.
+
+The skill is designed for the final stages of writing, after the content and structure are complete. It is not about rewriting sections—it is about refining the existing prose to its best possible form.
+
+## Multi-Pass Review Strategy
+
+Polish your paper in multiple focused passes rather than trying to fix everything at once. Each pass targets a specific aspect of the writing:
+
+### Pass 1: Structural Coherence
+
+Read each paragraph and check:
+- Does the first sentence state the paragraph's main point?
+- Does every subsequent sentence support or develop that point?
+- Does the last sentence transition to the next paragraph?
+- Could this paragraph be split into two (if it covers multiple ideas)?
+- Could this paragraph be merged with an adjacent one (if it makes only a minor point)?
+
+### Pass 2: Sentence-Level Clarity
+
+Read each sentence and check:
+- Is the subject of the sentence clear? Who or what is performing the action?
+- Is the sentence shorter than 35 words? If not, split it.
+- Are there any dangling modifiers or ambiguous pronoun references?
+- Is the main verb strong and specific? Replace weak verbs ("is," "has," "makes") with precise ones.
+- Is there unnecessary hedging? Remove "it should be noted that," "it is interesting that," "it is important to mention."
+
+### Pass 3: Word-Level Precision
+
+Review word choice throughout:
+- **Eliminate redundancy**: "past history" → "history"; "future prospects" → "prospects"; "end result" → "result"
+- **Prefer concrete over abstract**: "The algorithm processes data" → "The algorithm classifies images"
+- **Remove filler words**: "very," "quite," "rather," "somewhat," "basically," "actually," "really"
+- **Use precise quantifiers**: "many" → "47%"; "significantly" → "p < 0.01"; "fast" → "in 3.2 seconds"
+- **Consistent terminology**: Pick one term for each concept and use it throughout. Do not alternate between "method," "approach," "technique," and "framework" for the same thing.
+
+### Pass 4: LaTeX-Specific Polish
+
+For LaTeX manuscripts, check these formatting details:
+
+```latex
+% Non-breaking spaces before citations and references
+as shown in prior work~\cite{smith2024}
+in Figure~\ref{fig:architecture}
+in Table~\ref{tab:results}
+in Section~\ref{sec:methods}
+
+% Correct dash usage
+pages 1--10       % en-dash for ranges
+state-of-the-art  % hyphen for compound adjectives
+--- and           % em-dash for parenthetical (or use --)
+
+% Math mode consistency
+$n$-dimensional   % variable in math mode even in text
+$O(n \log n)$     % Big-O in math mode
+
+% Consistent use of \emph{} vs \textit{}
+% Use \emph{} for emphasis, \textit{} only when italic is the content (e.g., species names)
+```
+
+### Pass 5: Reference and Citation Check
+
+- Every claim that is not your own contribution or common knowledge needs a citation
+- Citations should be positioned at the end of the specific claim, not at the end of a paragraph about multiple claims
+- Check that all `\cite{}` keys resolve to entries in your `.bib` file
+- Verify that author names and years in the compiled PDF match the actual publications
+- Ensure consistent citation style (Author (Year) vs. [Number])
+
+## Common Patterns to Fix
+
+### Wordy Constructions
+
+| Wordy | Concise |
+|-------|---------|
+| "In order to" | "To" |
+| "Due to the fact that" | "Because" |
+| "A large number of" | "Many" |
+| "In the event that" | "If" |
+| "At the present time" | "Now" / "Currently" |
+| "It is possible that" | "May" / "Could" |
+| "Has the ability to" | "Can" |
+| "With regard to" | "Regarding" / "About" |
+| "For the purpose of" | "To" / "For" |
+| "On the basis of" | "Based on" |
+
+### Weak Sentence Openings
+
+Avoid starting sentences with:
+- "It is..." or "There are..." (expletive constructions) — Rewrite with a real subject
+- "This" without a noun — "This shows..." → "This result shows..."
+- "We can see that..." — Just state what is seen
+- "As we know..." — If it is known, just state it
+
+### Passive Voice Overuse
+
+Academic writing traditionally uses passive voice, but overuse makes prose sluggish. Use active voice for your contributions and passive for standard procedures:
+
+- Active (preferred for claims): "We propose a new architecture that..."
+- Passive (acceptable for procedures): "The data were preprocessed using..."
+- Passive (avoid): "It was found that the results were improved by..."
+  → Active: "Our method improved results by..."
+
+## Automated Assistance Tools
+
+Complement manual review with these tools:
+
+- **LaTeX linting**: Use `chktex` or `lacheck` to catch common LaTeX issues (missing tildes, inconsistent quotes, etc.)
+- **Spell check**: Use `aspell` or your editor's built-in spell checker with a custom dictionary for technical terms
+- **Style checking**: `textlint` or `writegood` can flag passive voice, weasel words, and other style issues
+- **Grammar**: Grammarly or LanguageTool can catch grammatical errors, but review their suggestions critically—they sometimes "fix" correct academic constructions
+- **Consistency checker**: Search your document for variant spellings ("dataset" vs "data set", "pretrained" vs "pre-trained") and standardize
+
+```bash
+# Find common issues with chktex
+chktex -v3 main.tex
+
+# Check spelling with aspell
+aspell --mode=tex check main.tex
+
+# Find inconsistent terminology
+grep -n "data set\|dataset" main.tex
+grep -n "pre-train\|pretrain" main.tex
+```
+
+## Final Quality Checklist
+
+Before declaring the paper polished:
+
+- [ ] No sentence exceeds 40 words
+- [ ] No paragraph exceeds 200 words (with rare exceptions)
+- [ ] All figures and tables are referenced in order
+- [ ] Non-breaking spaces before all `\cite`, `\ref`, and `\eqref` commands
+- [ ] Consistent number formatting (commas for thousands: 10,000 not 10000)
+- [ ] Units separated from numbers by a thin space: `$3.2\,\text{ms}$`
+- [ ] No orphaned or widowed lines (single lines at top/bottom of page)
+- [ ] PDF renders correctly with all fonts embedded
+
+## References
+
+- Writing Style Guide: https://github.com/yzhao062/writing-style
+- Strunk, W. & White, E.B. "The Elements of Style"
+- Zobel, J. "Writing for Computer Science" (Springer)
+- Chktex LaTeX linter: https://www.nongnu.org/chktex/