@v587d/capital-generation 2.7.12 → 2.8.1

package/selected-skills/InvestSkill/plugins/us-stock-analysis/skills/dividend-analysis/references/10-analysis-framework.md

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# Analysis Framework
+
+Part 1 of 5 for `dividend-analysis` — Analysis Framework
+See `SKILL.md` for what to read and when; this part is procedure, not routing.
+
+## Analysis Framework
+
+### 1. Dividend Safety Analysis
+
+Assess the reliability and sustainability of the dividend:
+
+**Payout Ratio Analysis**
+- **EPS-based payout ratio**: Dividends per share / Earnings per share. Simple but earnings can be distorted by non-cash items.
+- **FCF-based payout ratio**: Dividends paid / Free cash flow. More reliable measure — cash must be available to actually pay dividends.
+- **AFFO payout ratio** (REITs): Dividends / Adjusted Funds From Operations. Standard metric for REITs since depreciation distorts net income.
+
+**Safety Thresholds by Sector**
+```
+Sector               Very Safe    Moderate     Elevated     Danger
+General (FCF)          <50%        50-70%       70-85%       >85%
+Utilities (FCF)        <60%        60-75%       75-85%       >85%
+REITs (AFFO)           <70%        70-80%       80-90%       >90%
+Banks (Earnings)       <30%        30-40%       40-55%       >55%
+MLPs (DCF)             <60%        60-75%       75-90%       >90%
+```
+
+**Dividend Safety Score (0-100)**
+
+Weighted composite score:
+- FCF payout ratio (25 pts): <50% = 25, 50-70% = 20, 70-85% = 10, >85% = 0
+- FCF coverage ratio (20 pts): >2x = 20, 1.5-2x = 15, 1.0-1.5x = 8, <1.0x = 0
+- Debt-to-EBITDA (20 pts): <1.5x = 20, 1.5-2.5x = 14, 2.5-3.5x = 7, >3.5x = 0
+- Earnings stability (20 pts): Positive EPS 5yr = 20, 1 down year = 12, 2+ down years = 4
+- Dividend history (15 pts): 10+ yr streak = 15, 5-9 yrs = 10, 2-4 yrs = 5, <2 yrs = 0
+
+```
+Score      Grade    Safety Assessment
+90-100       A+     Very Safe
+75-89        A      Safe
+60-74        B      Borderline Safe
+45-59        C      Elevated Risk
+30-44        D      Unsafe
+0-29         F      Danger Zone
+```
+
+**Dividend Stress Test**
+- Scenario 1: Earnings decline 20% — can dividend be maintained at current payout?
+- Scenario 2: Earnings decline 40% — what happens to dividend?
+- Scenario 3: FCF drops to 5-year trough — payout ratio at trough FCF?
+- Scenario 4: Revenue declines to 2020 COVID levels — stress test against prior recession data
+- Pass/Fail for each scenario with projected payout ratio under stress
+
+### 2. Dividend Growth Analysis
+
+Measure the trajectory and sustainability of dividend increases:
+
+**Dividend Growth Rate Calculations**
+- 1-year DGR: Most recent annual dividend / Prior year annual dividend - 1
+- 3-year DGR CAGR: (Current annual dividend / Dividend 3 years ago)^(1/3) - 1
+- 5-year DGR CAGR: (Current / 5yr ago)^(1/5) - 1
+- 10-year DGR CAGR: (Current / 10yr ago)^(1/10) - 1
+
+```
+DGR Tier        Range          Characteristic
+Exceptional      >15%          High-growth compounders (FAST Graphs category)
+Strong           8-15%         Solid dividend growers, re-rated higher
+Moderate         4-8%          In line with or above inflation
+Slow             1-4%          Token increases, inflation parity risk
+Frozen           0%            No recent growth
+Cut             <0%            Dividend reduced — major red flag
+```
+
+**Dividend Aristocrats and Kings**
+- **Dividend Aristocrats**: S&P 500 constituents with 25+ consecutive years of dividend increases
+- **Dividend Kings**: Stocks with 50+ consecutive years of consecutive increases (elite tier)
+- **Dividend Achievers**: Stocks with 10+ consecutive years of increases (Nasdaq definition)
+- Status confirmation adds credibility to safety assessment
+
+**Chowder Rule**
+```
+Chowder Number = Current Yield + 5-Year DGR
+
+Thresholds:
+- Growth stocks (yield <3%): Chowder Number >= 12%
+- High-yield stocks (yield >= 3%): Chowder Number >= 8%
+- Utilities: Chowder Number >= 8% (special lower threshold)
+
+Example: Yield 2.5% + 5yr DGR 10% = Chowder 12.5% (PASS for growth stock)
+```
+
+**Dividend Growth Sustainability Analysis**
+- EPS growth rate vs. dividend growth rate: DGR > EPS growth = unsustainable (payout expansion)
+- Payout ratio trend: expanding payout ratio limits future growth capacity
+- FCF per share growth trend (primary driver of long-term DGR)
+- Analyst consensus EPS growth estimate → maximum sustainable DGR = EPS growth + (payout reduction capacity)
+- Revenue growth required to sustain dividend at current margins
+
+### 3. Yield Analysis
+
+Evaluate current yield attractiveness in historical and relative context:
+
+**Current and Forward Yield**
+- **Trailing yield**: Last 12 months dividends paid / Current price
+- **Forward yield**: Projected next 12 months dividends / Current price (based on most recent quarterly dividend × 4)
+- **Yield spread**: Forward yield minus 10-year Treasury yield. Positive spread = attractive income premium vs. risk-free rate.
+
+**Historical Yield Context**
+```
+Yield Position          Interpretation
+Current yield < 5yr avg   Stock trading at premium to historical (yield compressed = expensive)
+Current yield ≈ 5yr avg   Fairly valued relative to history
+Current yield > 5yr avg   Stock trading at discount (yield elevated = potentially cheap or risk elevated)
+Current yield > 10yr avg  Historically cheap zone (requires safety check)
+```
+
+**Yield vs. 10-Year Treasury Analysis**
+- Yield spread over 10-year Treasury: track historical spread compression/expansion
+- Equity risk premium: compensates for equity risk vs. guaranteed government yield
+- When spread < 1%: dividend yield barely compensates for equity risk vs. bonds
+- When spread > 3%: significantly better income from equity vs. bonds (attractive)
+
+**Yield-on-Cost (YOC) for Existing Holders**
+- YOC = Original purchase price yield × (1 + DGR)^years held
+- Demonstrates power of growing dividends on a fixed cost basis
+- Example: 2% yield at purchase with 10% DGR for 10 years = 5.2% YOC
+
+**Yield Trap Detection**
+
+High yield + deteriorating business = value trap. Scrutiny triggers:
+- Yield exceeds 7%: require thorough FCF analysis before investing
+- Yield > 2x sector average: market pricing in dividend risk
+- Yield spiked due to price decline (not dividend increase): investigate cause
+- Consecutive quarters of FCF deterioration while yield elevated
+- Debt issuance to fund dividend payments
+- Red flags: declining revenue, rising payout ratio, credit rating downgrades, management tone change on dividend
+
+
+This section is not finished here: `Analysis Framework` continues in `references/11-dividend-history-and-reliability.md`.

package/selected-skills/InvestSkill/plugins/us-stock-analysis/skills/dividend-analysis/references/11-dividend-history-and-reliability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# Analysis Framework(continued)
+
+Part 2 of 5 for `dividend-analysis` — Analysis Framework; Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends
+See `SKILL.md` for what to read and when; this part is procedure, not routing.
+
+### 4. Dividend History and Reliability
+
+Assess the track record of consistent payments:
+
+**Payment History Metrics**
+- Consecutive years of uninterrupted dividend payments
+- Consecutive years of dividend increases (key Aristocrat/King qualifier)
+- Longest streak before any interruption
+
+**Recession Durability**
+- 2000-2002 dot-com recession: Was dividend maintained? Cut? Raised?
+- 2008-2009 financial crisis: Stress test benchmark — worst modern recession for dividends
+- 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: Industry-specific stress (travel, retail vs. tech, healthcare)
+- Pattern: Companies that maintained dividends in 2008-2009 AND 2020 = highest quality
+
+**Dividend Variability Score**
+- Standard deviation of quarterly dividend payments over 5 years
+- Low variability = consistent, predictable income
+- High variability = irregular payments (often MLPs, resource companies)
+- Flag: Any quarters with 0 dividend (interrupted streak)
+
+**Special Dividends History**
+- Frequency of special/supplemental dividends
+- Size relative to regular dividend (>25% = meaningful supplement)
+- Source: excess FCF, asset sales, one-time items
+- Interpretation: signals strong balance sheet but not guaranteed income
+
+### 5. Financial Health Supporting Dividends
+
+Analyze the underlying balance sheet and cash flow capacity:
+
+**Free Cash Flow Coverage**
+- FCF coverage = FCF / Total dividends paid
+- Target: >1.5x (dividend consumes <67% of FCF)
+- Warning: <1.2x (thin margin of safety)
+- Danger: <1.0x (dividend exceeds FCF — funded by debt or asset sales)
+
+**Leverage Analysis**
+```
+Debt-to-EBITDA    Dividend Capacity
+<2.0x             Comfortable — dividend growth well supported
+2.0-3.0x          Moderate — growth may slow, dividend stable
+3.0-4.0x          Constrained — dividend at risk if earnings decline
+>4.0x             High risk — debt servicing may crowd out dividends
+```
+
+**Interest Coverage Ratio**
+- EBIT / Interest expense
+- >5x: Strong — debt servicing leaves ample room for dividends
+- 3-5x: Adequate — moderate buffer
+- 2-3x: Tight — interest burden limits flexibility
+- <2x: Concerning — dividends may compete with debt service
+
+**Liquidity Analysis**
+- Cash and equivalents on balance sheet
+- Months of dividends covered by current cash (Cash / Annual dividend)
+- Revolving credit facility availability
+- Upcoming debt maturities that require cash allocation
+
+**Credit Rating Impact**
+- Investment-grade rating (BBB- and above): access to capital markets supports dividend
+- Below investment-grade: higher borrowing cost constrains dividend flexibility
+- Rating watch negative: proactive concern — dividend may be reviewed
+- Downgrade history relative to dividend decisions
+
+### 6. Income Optimization Analysis
+
+Model the income generation and compounding potential:
+
+**Total Return Decomposition**
+- Income component: dividend yield contribution to annual return
+- Price appreciation component: capital gains contribution
+- For dividend investors: income component often 30-60% of total return over time
+
+**DRIP Reinvestment Analysis**
+- Compound growth projection assuming dividends reinvested at current yield
+- Year 1, 5, 10, 20 projections at: 0% DGR (frozen), 3% DGR, 7% DGR, 10% DGR
+- Example: $10,000 investment at 3% yield, 7% DGR, DRIP for 20 years = [calculated value]
+- DRIP accelerates wealth building by purchasing additional shares at each dividend
+
+**Tax Efficiency**
+- **Qualified dividends**: taxed at lower capital gains rates (0%, 15%, or 20%)
+  - Requirements: US corporation, held >60 days in 120-day window around ex-div
+- **Non-qualified (ordinary) dividends**: taxed at ordinary income rates (up to 37%)
+- **REIT distributions**: largely ordinary income (not qualified) — best in tax-advantaged accounts
+- **Foreign withholding taxes**: may apply to ADRs and foreign-domiciled companies
+- **MLP distributions**: return of capital treatment (reduces cost basis)
+
+**Ex-Dividend Date Calendar**
+- Ex-dividend date: must own shares before this date to receive dividend
+- Record date: typically 1 business day after ex-div
+- Payment date: typically 2-4 weeks after record date
+- Impact: stock typically declines by approximately dividend amount on ex-div date
+
+**Portfolio Income Modeling**
+- At current prices and yields: projected annual income from portfolio
+- Annual income per $100,000 invested by ticker
+- Weighted average portfolio yield
+- Quarterly income distribution timeline
+
+### 7. Peer Comparison
+
+Benchmark the stock's dividend metrics against sector:
+
+**Comparison Metrics Table**
+
+| Metric | [Stock] | Sector Median | Sector Top Quartile | Assessment |
+|--------|---------|---------------|--------------------|-|
+| Dividend Yield | X.X% | X.X% | X.X% | Above/Below |
+| FCF Payout Ratio | XX% | XX% | XX% | Safe/Risky |
+| 5-yr DGR | X.X% | X.X% | X.X% | Strong/Weak |
+| Chowder Number | XX.X | XX.X | XX.X | Pass/Fail |
+| Safety Score | XX | XX | XX | Grade |
+| Consecutive Increases | XX yrs | XX yrs | XX yrs | — |
+
+**Value vs. Yield Matrix**
+- Identify sector peers with better yield at similar or lower valuation
+- Compare P/E vs. yield to identify mispriced dividend payers
+- Best-in-class: highest Chowder Number, highest Safety Score, lowest payout ratio
+
+---
+
+## Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends
+
+
+This section is not finished here: `Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends` continues in `references/12-share-buyback-analysis.md`.

package/selected-skills/InvestSkill/plugins/us-stock-analysis/skills/dividend-analysis/references/12-share-buyback-analysis.md

@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+# Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends(continued)
+
+Part 3 of 5 for `dividend-analysis` — Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends
+See `SKILL.md` for what to read and when; this part is procedure, not routing.
+
+### 8. Share Buyback Analysis
+
+Evaluate the quality, discipline, and shareholder value impact of the buyback program:
+
+**Buyback Authorization vs. Execution Rate**
+- Board-authorized repurchase program size ($B and % of market cap)
+- Actual shares repurchased over trailing 1, 3, and 5 years vs. authorization
+- Execution rate = Actual buybacks / Authorized amount. <50% execution signals authorization is more PR than commitment.
+- Open-ended vs. time-limited program structure
+
+**Buyback Yield**
+```
+Buyback Yield = Annual Buybacks ($) / Market Cap
+
+Interpretation:
+>5%     Very High — meaningful return of capital
+3-5%    High — material shareholder benefit
+1-3%    Moderate — supplementary to other returns
+<1%     Low — minimal buyback impact
+```
+
+**Price Discipline: Are They Buying Smart?**
+- Compare average buyback price (total buybacks / shares retired) to estimated intrinsic value
+- Cross-reference buyback timing with stock price history: did they buy at peaks or troughs?
+- Assess whether management references valuation discipline in earnings calls or 8-K filings
+- Red flag: heavy buybacks at peak multiples followed by equity issuance at lower prices (value destruction cycle)
+- Green flag: buybacks accelerate when stock trades below 52-week average and slow at all-time highs
+
+**EPS Accretion / Dilution Impact**
+- Shares outstanding trend (5-year): shrinking = accretive, flat = offset by stock comp, growing = dilutive
+- Net buyback rate = (Buybacks - Stock-based compensation issuance) / Beginning shares outstanding
+- Positive net buyback rate: genuine per-share value creation
+- Stock-based compensation as % of FCF: >15% indicates compensation is largely offsetting buyback benefits
+
+**Insider Ownership Change from Buybacks**
+- Management and insider ownership % before and after buyback program
+- Higher ownership % via buybacks (without insider sales) = alignment signal
+- Watch for executives simultaneously selling shares while company repurchases — misalignment flag
+
+### 9. M&A Capital Allocation
+
+Evaluate how management deploys capital in acquisitions:
+
+**Historical Acquisition Multiples Paid**
+- List of major acquisitions (last 10 years) with: deal size, EV/EBITDA paid, EV/Revenue paid
+- Compare deal multiples to prevailing sector averages at time of acquisition
+- Premium paid vs. 30-day pre-announcement trading price
+```
+Acquisition Multiple Assessment:
+EV/EBITDA paid     Assessment
+<8x                Disciplined — below sector norm
+8-12x              Fair — in line with sector
+12-18x             Premium — requires strong strategic rationale
+>18x               Rich — significant execution risk, high dilution risk
+```
+
+**Acquisition Integration Track Record**
+- For each major deal: post-acquisition revenue growth vs. original projections
+- Goodwill impairments taken (a direct admission of overpayment)
+- Post-deal margin trajectory: synergies realized vs. promised synergies?
+- Management tenure on acquired businesses: assets retained or subsequently divested?
+- Rule of thumb: companies that regularly impair goodwill are serial overpayers
+
+**Deal Discipline: Overpaying Risk Score**
+```
+Risk Factor                                    Points
+History of goodwill impairments                +2
+Average EV/EBITDA paid > sector median + 20%  +2
+Acquisitions during peak market periods        +1
+Frequent large deals (>3 major in 5 yrs)       +1
+Post-deal margin compression                   +1
+Management turnover post-acquisition           +1
+Overpaying Risk Score: 0 = Disciplined | 3+ = Caution | 5+ = Dealmaker Risk
+```
+
+**Organic vs. Inorganic Growth Split**
+- Revenue growth decomposed: organic growth % vs. acquisition contribution %
+- Companies growing primarily through acquisitions carry execution and integration risk
+- Preferred profile: >60% organic growth with acquisitions as bolt-ons, not growth substitutes
+- M&A dependency ratio: Acquired revenue in period / Total revenue growth in period
+
+### 10. Debt Management
+
+Evaluate how management structures and manages the balance sheet:
+
+**Debt Paydown Pace vs. Optimal Leverage**
+- Current net debt / EBITDA vs. management's stated target leverage
+- Annual debt reduction pace (last 3 years): de-levering or re-levering?
+- Post-acquisition leverage spike: how quickly did they return to target?
+- Optimal leverage range by sector:
+```
+Sector              Conservative    Moderate    Stretched
+Technology          0-0.5x          0.5-1.5x    >2.0x
+Consumer Staples    1.0-2.0x        2.0-3.0x    >3.5x
+Industrials         1.5-2.5x        2.5-3.5x    >4.0x
+Utilities           2.5-4.0x        4.0-5.0x    >6.0x
+REITs               4.0-6.0x        6.0-7.0x    >8.0x
+```
+
+**Refinancing Risk (Maturity Schedule)**
+- Debt maturity wall: total maturities due in the next 1, 2, 3, and 5 years
+- Maturity concentration: >30% of debt maturing in a single year = elevated refinancing risk
+- Current interest rate environment vs. existing fixed coupon: rising-rate risk on floating debt
+- Undrawn revolving credit facility as buffer against maturity pressure
+
+**Covenant Headroom**
+- Key financial covenants (Debt/EBITDA, Interest Coverage minimums) from credit agreement disclosures
+- Current ratio vs. covenant threshold: headroom percentage
+- Historical covenant compliance record
+- Waiver history: any covenant waivers obtained = yellow flag
+
+**Credit Rating Trend**
+- Current rating from Moody's, S&P, Fitch (note most recent action)
+- Rating trajectory (last 3 rating actions: upgrades, downgrades, outlook changes)
+- Investment-grade threshold: BBB-/Baa3 and above — critical for institutional ownership and dividend sustainability
+- Negative outlook or credit watch = potential near-term action risk
+- Spread on bonds vs. comparable investment-grade index: market's implied rating view
+
+
+This section is not finished here: `Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends` continues in `references/13-fcf-deployment-scorecard.md`.

package/selected-skills/InvestSkill/plugins/us-stock-analysis/skills/dividend-analysis/references/13-fcf-deployment-scorecard.md

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+# Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends(continued)
+
+Part 4 of 5 for `dividend-analysis` — Capital Allocation — Beyond Dividends; Data Sources; Input Formats
+See `SKILL.md` for what to read and when; this part is procedure, not routing.
+
+### 11. FCF Deployment Scorecard
+
+Evaluate how every dollar of free cash flow is allocated across competing priorities:
+
+**Where Does Every $1 of FCF Go?**
+
+Break down actual FCF deployment over trailing 3 years (TTM and 3-year average):
+```
+FCF Deployment Breakdown:
+  Dividends paid:          XX%   ($X.Xb)
+  Share buybacks:          XX%   ($X.Xb)
+  Debt reduction:          XX%   ($X.Xb)
+  Capital expenditures:    XX%   (already deducted from FCF — note if gross capex used)
+  M&A and investments:     XX%   ($X.Xb)
+  Cash accumulation:        XX%   ($X.Xb)
+  Total:                  100%
+```
+- Note: if using levered FCF, capex is already deducted; use gross cash deployment including capex separately if unlevered FCF is the base
+- Trend: is FCF deployment mix shifting? (e.g., buybacks replacing dividends, or debt paydown replacing buybacks)
+
+**Capital Return Yield vs. Peers**
+```
+Capital Return Yield = Dividend Yield + Buyback Yield
+
+Stock         Div Yield   Buyback Yield   Total Return Yield   vs. Peer Median
+[Stock]         X.X%         X.X%              X.X%               +/- X.Xpp
+[Peer 1]        X.X%         X.X%              X.X%               Median
+[Peer 2]        X.X%         X.X%              X.X%               +/- X.Xpp
+[Peer 3]        X.X%         X.X%              X.X%               +/- X.Xpp
+```
+
+**Management Capital Allocation Grade**
+
+Score each dimension and assign an overall letter grade:
+
+| Dimension | Score | Grade | Key Evidence |
+|-----------|-------|-------|--------------|
+| Dividend safety & growth | X/10 | A-F | Payout ratio, streak, DGR |
+| Buyback discipline | X/10 | A-F | Price timing, net share reduction |
+| M&A track record | X/10 | A-F | Goodwill impairments, synergy delivery |
+| Debt management | X/10 | A-F | Leverage trajectory, maturity management |
+| FCF deployment efficiency | X/10 | A-F | Return yield vs. peers, cash hoarding |
+| **Overall Grade** | **X/10** | **A-F** | **Composite assessment** |
+
+```
+Grade Criteria:
+A (9-10): Consistent compounders — buyback below fair value, dividend aristocrat, M&A creates value, optimal leverage
+B (7-8):  Good stewards — solid on most dimensions, one area of weakness
+C (5-6):  Average — market-rate capital return, limited M&A track record
+D (3-4):  Poor — overpays for M&A, buybacks at peak, dividend growth stagnant
+F (0-2):  Value destroyers — goodwill impairments, dividend cuts, re-levering balance sheet
+```
+
+### 12. Capital Allocation Quality Score (Composite 0–10)
+
+Single composite score summarizing overall capital allocation quality:
+
+```
+Component                        Weight   Score (0-10)   Weighted Score
+Dividend Safety Score              20%      X.X            X.X
+Dividend Growth Quality            10%      X.X            X.X
+Buyback Discipline                 20%      X.X            X.X
+M&A Track Record                   20%      X.X            X.X
+Debt Management Quality            15%      X.X            X.X
+FCF Deployment Efficiency          15%      X.X            X.X
+━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
+Capital Allocation Quality Score   100%                    X.X / 10
+```
+
+```
+Score    Interpretation
+9-10     Exceptional stewardship — rare, compounding machines
+7-8      Strong allocators — above-average long-term value creation
+5-6      Average — market-rate capital allocation, no clear edge
+3-4      Below average — capital misallocation risk weighs on returns
+0-2      Poor stewardship — history of value destruction through M&A, buybacks at peaks, or dividend unsustainability
+```
+
+---
+
+## Data Sources
+
+**Primary Financials**
+- SEC filings (10-K / 10-Q): FCF, net income, dividends paid (cash flow statement), share repurchase disclosures
+- Company investor relations pages: dividend history, buyback program announcements, earnings call transcripts
+
+**Dividend Research Platforms**
+- **Simply Safe Dividends**: Dividend Safety Scores, comprehensive dividend data (premium)
+- **Dividend.com**: Dividend yield, history, DRIP calculators
+- **DRIP Investing Resource Center (dripinvesting.org)**: Aristocrats/Kings lists
+- **Seeking Alpha Dividends**: Analyst commentary on dividend sustainability
+- **S&P Global**: Official Dividend Aristocrats and Kings lists
+
+**Capital Allocation Research**
+- **Compustat / FactSet**: Multi-year buyback and M&A data
+- **Bloomberg**: Credit ratings, bond spreads, covenant disclosures
+- **Morningstar**: Capital allocation ratings, M&A track record, stewardship grade
+- **GuruFocus**: FCF analysis, buyback history, insider ownership
+
+**Screening Tools**
+- Finviz screener: Filter by dividend yield, payout ratio, buyback yield
+- Morningstar: Capital Allocation rating (Exemplary / Standard / Poor)
+- GuruFocus: Capital allocation and management quality scores
+
+## Input Formats
+
+### Format 1: Single Ticker
+```
+User: /dividend-analysis AAPL
+
+Claude analyzes AAPL across all capital allocation dimensions
+```
+
+### Format 2: Portfolio Income Review
+```
+User: /dividend-analysis --portfolio AAPL,JNJ,KO,PEP,XOM
+
+Claude provides comparative analysis across all tickers with portfolio-level income model and capital return yields
+```
+
+### Format 3: Sector Screen
+```
+User: /dividend-analysis --sector utilities
+
+Claude screens utilities sector for best capital allocation quality using safety, growth, buyback yield, and M&A discipline criteria
+```
+
+

package/selected-skills/InvestSkill/plugins/us-stock-analysis/skills/dividend-analysis/references/14-output.md

@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+# Output
+
+Part 5 of 5 for `dividend-analysis` — Output; Standard Signal Output; Thesis Invalidation
+See `SKILL.md` for what to read and when; this part is procedure, not routing.
+
+## Output
+
+Provide a comprehensive capital allocation analysis report with the following sections:
+
+### 1. Executive Summary
+- **Capital Allocation Quality Score**: [0-10] with interpretation
+- **Dividend Safety Score**: [0-100] with letter grade (A+/A/B/C/D/F)
+- **Safety Assessment**: Very Safe / Safe / Borderline / Unsafe / Danger
+- **Current Yield**: X.X% trailing | X.X% forward
+- **Capital Return Yield**: X.X% (dividend + buyback yield)
+- **Chowder Number**: X.X (Pass/Fail)
+- **Management Allocation Grade**: A/B/C/D/F
+- **Key Finding**: 2-3 sentence summary of most important conclusion
+
+### 2. Dividend Safety Analysis
+```
+FCF Payout Ratio:       XX%     (Target <70%)
+FCF Coverage Ratio:     X.Xx    (Target >1.5x)
+Debt-to-EBITDA:         X.Xx    (Target <3x)
+Interest Coverage:      X.Xx    (Target >3x)
+Stress Test (20% EPS):  PASS/FAIL
+Stress Test (40% EPS):  PASS/FAIL
+Safety Score:           XX/100  Grade [X]
+```
+
+### 3. Dividend Growth Metrics
+```
+1-Year DGR:             X.X%
+3-Year DGR (CAGR):      X.X%
+5-Year DGR (CAGR):      X.X%
+10-Year DGR (CAGR):     X.X%
+Aristocrat Status:      Yes/No (XX consecutive years)
+Chowder Number:         X.X% (Pass/Fail at X% threshold)
+Payout Ratio Trend:     Expanding / Stable / Contracting
+```
+
+### 4. Share Buyback Scorecard
+```
+Buyback Yield (TTM):    X.X%
+Net Share Reduction:    X.X% annualized (shares outstanding trend)
+Stock Comp Offset:      XX% of buybacks offset by SBC
+Price Discipline:       Buying below / at / above estimated intrinsic value
+EPS Accretion Impact:   +X.X% annual EPS lift from net share reduction
+Buyback Grade:          A / B / C / D / F
+```
+
+### 5. M&A Track Record
+- Summary table of major acquisitions with multiples paid and outcome
+- Goodwill impairment history
+- Organic vs. inorganic revenue growth split
+- Overpaying Risk Score: X/8 (Low / Moderate / High)
+- M&A Grade: A / B / C / D / F
+
+### 6. Debt Management Assessment
+```
+Net Debt / EBITDA:      X.Xx  (Target range: X.X-X.Xx)
+Management Target:      X.Xx  (stated in investor materials)
+Leverage Trend:         De-levering / Stable / Re-levering
+Nearest Maturity Wall:  $Xb due in [Year] (XX% of total debt)
+Credit Rating:          [Moody's] / [S&P] / Outlook
+Covenant Headroom:      XX% above nearest covenant threshold
+Debt Grade:             A / B / C / D / F
+```
+
+### 7. FCF Deployment Breakdown
+- Pie breakdown: dividends %, buybacks %, M&A %, debt paydown %, cash accumulation %
+- Capital return yield vs. 3-5 sector peers
+- Management Capital Allocation Grade table (all 5 dimensions)
+
+### 8. Capital Allocation Quality Score Summary
+Full scoring table with component weights and final 0-10 composite score
+
+### 9. Yield Trap Assessment
+- Is current yield elevated vs. historical? If yes, why?
+- FCF trend supporting or undermining yield?
+- Red flag checklist (5-7 criteria, checked or clear)
+- Verdict: Genuine Value / Yield Trap Risk / Monitoring Required
+
+### 10. Peer Comparison Table
+Full comparison table vs. 3-5 sector peers across key metrics (dividend yield, buyback yield, total return yield, FCF payout, DGR, capital allocation score)
+
+### 11. Income Projections
+```
+$10,000 Invested at Current Price:
+  Annual income (Year 1):    $XXX
+  Annual income (Year 5):    $XXX  (at X% projected DGR)
+  Annual income (Year 10):   $XXX
+  Yield-on-Cost (Year 10):   X.X%
+  DRIP value (Year 10):      $XX,XXX
+```
+
+### 12. Key Risks to Capital Allocation
+- Ranked list of top 3-5 risks (dividend cut, M&A misstep, leverage spike, buyback cessation)
+- Probability assessment (Low/Medium/High) for each risk
+
+### 13. Monitoring Triggers
+- Specific metrics and thresholds that would change the safety assessment or overall score
+- Next dividend declaration date / ex-div date
+- Upcoming earnings where FCF and buyback data will be updated
+- Key M&A watch: is management signaling appetite for large deals?
+
+## Standard Signal Output
+
+All analysis concludes with this standardized block:
+
+```
+## Thesis Invalidation
+
+After delivering the analysis signal, specify what would reverse it:
+
+**If signal is BULLISH — thesis breaks if:**
+- dividend cut announced OR debt/EBITDA exceeds 4x
+- [One or two more triggers drawn from this analysis's own drivers, each with a threshold]
+
+**If signal is BEARISH — thesis breaks if:**
+- dividend raised AND FCF payout ratio improves below 50%
+- [One or two more triggers drawn from this analysis's own drivers, each with a threshold]
+
+**Re-run this analysis when:**
+- [ ] Next earnings release
+- [ ] Price moves ±15% from current level
+- [ ] 60 days have elapsed
+- [ ] Material news event (acquisition, leadership change, regulatory decision)
+
+╔══════════════════════════════════════════════╗
+║              INVESTMENT SIGNAL               ║
+╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
+║ Signal:      BULLISH / NEUTRAL / BEARISH     ║
+║ Confidence:  HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW             ║
+║ Horizon:     SHORT / MEDIUM / LONG-TERM      ║
+║ Score:       X.X / 10                        ║
+╠══════════════════════════════════════════════╣
+║ Action:      BUY / HOLD / SELL               ║
+║ Conviction:  STRONG / MODERATE / WEAK        ║
+╚══════════════════════════════════════════════╝
+```
+
+Score Guide: 8.0–10.0 Strongly Bullish | 6.0–7.9 Moderately Bullish | 4.0–5.9 Neutral | 2.0–3.9 Moderately Bearish | 0.0–1.9 Strongly Bearish
+Confidence: HIGH (strong data, clear signals) | MEDIUM (mixed signals) | LOW (limited data, conflicting signals)
+Horizon: SHORT-TERM (1 week–3 months) | MEDIUM-TERM (3 months–1 year) | LONG-TERM (1+ years)
+
+**Disclaimer:** Educational analysis only. Not financial advice.
+
+