@torrent-tv/proxy 2.87.10 → 2.87.11

package/services/encode/decode-cost-fit.js

@@ -1,363 +1,363 @@
-/**
- * @file Fit the cost of decoding from measured clips — and say which terms the
- * measurements actually determine.
- *
- * The model is `cost = pixelTerm × Mpixel/s + bitrateTerm × Mbit/s +
- * constantTerm`, in seconds of work per second of content.
- *
- * What went wrong with the fit this replaces, measured 2026-08-17: three clips
- * for three unknowns is an EXACT system, and two of those clips shared a pixel
- * rate and differed only in bitrate. A system that near-singular does not fail
- * loudly — it returns whatever satisfies the three equations, and on that boot
- * it returned `0.007542 × Mpx/s + 0.000000 × Mbit/s + 0.0000 s/s`. The bitrate
- * term and the constant were zero, so a film's own bitrate never entered its
- * price, and the whole prediction was 1.8-2.2x optimistic against what the same
- * file measured while playing.
- *
- * Two things are different here, and both are about honesty rather than
- * accuracy:
- *
- *   - the system is OVER-determined (six clips, three unknowns) and solved by
- *     least squares, so no single noisy reading decides a term;
- *   - a term is published only if the measurements determine it. The test is
- *     the coefficient against its OWN standard error: a term smaller than the
- *     uncertainty in it has not been measured, and stating it as a number —
- *     zero or otherwise — claims knowledge that is not there. It is dropped,
- *     the remaining terms are fitted again, and the caller is told which shape
- *     survived.
- *
- * There is no threshold to tune in that rule and no coefficient anywhere in
- * this file. "Smaller than its own uncertainty" is a statement about the data,
- * not a setting.
- */
-
-/**
- * One measured clip.
- *
- * @typedef {object} DecodeSample
- * @property {number} megapixelsPerSecond - Width × height × frame rate ÷ 1e6.
- * @property {number} megabitsPerSecond - The clip's own measured bitrate.
- * @property {number} costSecondsPerSecond - Seconds of work per second of
- *   content, from ffmpeg's own progress.
- */
-
-/**
- * The fitted model, with the shape the data supported.
- *
- * @typedef {object} DecodeCostModel
- * @property {number} pixelTerm
- * @property {number} bitrateTerm
- * @property {number} constantTerm
- * @property {string} shape - Which terms were determined.
- * @property {string[]} dropped - Terms the measurements could not determine.
- * @property {number} samples
- * @property {number} residualRms - Typical disagreement between the fit and a
- *   measurement, in the same units as the cost.
- */
-
-/** Every term the model can carry, in column order. */
-const TERMS = ["pixels", "bitrate", "constant"];
-
-/**
- * Fit the model, dropping any term the measurements do not determine.
- *
- * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
- * @returns {DecodeCostModel | null} Null when nothing at all can be said: fewer
- *   measurements than terms, or no measurable dependence on the source.
- */
-export function fitDecodeCost(samples) {
-  const usable = (Array.isArray(samples) ? samples : []).filter(
-    (sample) =>
-      Number.isFinite(sample?.megapixelsPerSecond) &&
-      sample.megapixelsPerSecond > 0 &&
-      Number.isFinite(sample?.megabitsPerSecond) &&
-      sample.megabitsPerSecond >= 0 &&
-      Number.isFinite(sample?.costSecondsPerSecond) &&
-      sample.costSecondsPerSecond > 0
-  );
-  // Fitting three terms to three points is what produced the degenerate answer
-  // this file exists to prevent: it has no residual and therefore no way to
-  // notice that two of the points said the same thing.
-  if (usable.length < TERMS.length + 1) {
-    return null;
-  }
-
-  let columns = [...TERMS];
-  let dropped = [];
-  for (let attempt = 0; attempt < TERMS.length; attempt += 1) {
-    const fit = leastSquares(usable, columns);
-    if (!fit) {
-      return null;
-    }
-    // Which terms the data did not determine: a coefficient no larger than the
-    // uncertainty in it. Only one is dropped per pass — removing a column
-    // changes the uncertainty in the others, so the question has to be asked
-    // again of the smaller model.
-    const undetermined = columns
-      .map((name, index) => ({
-        name,
-        coefficient: fit.coefficients[index],
-        ratio: determination(usable, columns, name, fit.coefficients[index], fit.standardErrors[index], fit.residualRms)
-      }))
-      // The pixel term is the one relationship every measurement agrees on, and
-      // a model without it says nothing at all. If IT is undetermined the
-      // answer is no model, which the caller handles by pricing the encoder
-      // alone and refusing nothing.
-      // A NEGATIVE coefficient is undetermined whatever its ratio says. Every
-      // term here is physically non-negative — more pixels cannot cost less
-      // work, and neither can more bits — so a negative fit is noise winning
-      // over an effect, not a discovery about the host. Clamping it to zero
-      // instead, which the first version of this file did, publishes a zero
-      // that looks measured: exactly the dishonesty the module exists to
-      // remove.
-      .filter((term) => term.ratio < 1 || term.coefficient < 0)
-      .sort((left, right) => {
-        const negative = (term) => (term.coefficient < 0 ? 0 : 1);
-        return negative(left) - negative(right) || left.ratio - right.ratio;
-      });
-
-    if (undetermined.length === 0) {
-      return published(columns, fit, dropped, usable.length);
-    }
-    const weakest = undetermined[0].name;
-    if (weakest === "pixels") {
-      return null;
-    }
-    columns = columns.filter((name) => name !== weakest);
-    dropped = [...dropped, weakest];
-    if (columns.length === 0) {
-      return null;
-    }
-  }
-  return null;
-}
-
-
-/**
- * How well one term is determined, as a ratio against 1.
- *
- * Two ways a term can fail to be measured, and both have to be asked, because
- * each is blind where the other sees:
- *
- *   - **against the noise.** The term's effect across the range the clips
- *     actually cover — its coefficient times the spread of its own column — has
- *     to be larger than the typical disagreement between the fit and the
- *     measurements. A term whose whole contribution is smaller than the scatter
- *     was not measured; it was fitted to the scatter.
- *   - **against the arithmetic.** When a fit happens to be exact the scatter is
- *     zero, every standard error vanishes, and a coefficient of 7e-18 — which
- *     is how double-precision writes "nothing" — passes any test framed as a
- *     ratio. So the effect must also be larger than what the arithmetic itself
- *     can represent at this scale. That floor is a property of the numbers, not
- *     a setting: it moves with the size of the measurements.
- *
- * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
- * @param {string[]} columns
- * @param {string} name
- * @param {number} coefficient
- * @param {number} standardError
- * @param {number} residualRms
- * @returns {number} Below 1 means the measurements do not determine this term.
- */
-function determination(samples, columns, name, coefficient, standardError, residualRms) {
-  const values = samples.map((sample) => {
-    if (name === "pixels") {
-      return sample.megapixelsPerSecond;
-    }
-    if (name === "bitrate") {
-      return sample.megabitsPerSecond;
-    }
-    return 1;
-  });
-  const spread = name === "constant" ? 1 : Math.max(...values) - Math.min(...values);
-  const effect = Math.abs(coefficient) * spread;
-  const meanCost = samples.reduce((sum, sample) => sum + sample.costSecondsPerSecond, 0) / samples.length;
-  const arithmeticFloor = Math.abs(meanCost) * Number.EPSILON * samples.length * columns.length;
-  const noiseFloor = Math.max(residualRms, arithmeticFloor);
-  const againstNoise = noiseFloor > 0 ? effect / noiseFloor : Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY;
-  const againstError = standardError > 0 ? Math.abs(coefficient) / standardError : Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY;
-  return Math.min(againstNoise, againstError);
-}
-
-/**
- * Assemble the answer, with absent terms as zero — and `dropped` saying that
- * the zero means "not measured" rather than "measured to be nothing".
- *
- * @param {string[]} columns
- * @param {{ coefficients: number[], residualRms: number }} fit
- * @param {string[]} dropped
- * @param {number} samples
- * @returns {DecodeCostModel | null}
- */
-function published(columns, fit, dropped, samples) {
-  const value = (name) => {
-    const index = columns.indexOf(name);
-    return index < 0 ? 0 : fit.coefficients[index];
-  };
-  const pixelTerm = value("pixels");
-  // A negative price for pixels is not a host being unusual — it is noise
-  // larger than the effect, and carrying it would price a bigger picture as
-  // cheaper than a smaller one.
-  if (!(pixelTerm > 0)) {
-    return null;
-  }
-  const constantTerm = value("constant");
-  return {
-    pixelTerm,
-    bitrateTerm: Math.max(0, value("bitrate")),
-    // A negative constant would make a small enough source free, which no
-    // measurement here supports: it is the fitted line crossing below zero
-    // outside the range that was measured.
-    constantTerm: Math.max(0, constantTerm),
-    shape: columns.join("+"),
-    dropped,
-    samples,
-    residualRms: fit.residualRms
-  };
-}
-
-/**
- * Least squares over the named columns, with the standard error of each
- * coefficient.
- *
- * Solved through the normal equations. The matrix is at most 3×3 and the
- * columns are of similar magnitude once a clip set varies them deliberately,
- * which is exactly what the set is designed for.
- *
- * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
- * @param {string[]} columns
- * @returns {{ coefficients: number[], standardErrors: number[], residualRms: number } | null}
- */
-function leastSquares(samples, columns) {
-  const rowOf = (sample) =>
-    columns.map((name) => {
-      if (name === "pixels") {
-        return sample.megapixelsPerSecond;
-      }
-      if (name === "bitrate") {
-        return sample.megabitsPerSecond;
-      }
-      return 1;
-    });
-  const width = columns.length;
-  const normal = Array.from({ length: width }, () => new Array(width).fill(0));
-  const right = new Array(width).fill(0);
-  for (const sample of samples) {
-    const row = rowOf(sample);
-    for (let i = 0; i < width; i += 1) {
-      right[i] += row[i] * sample.costSecondsPerSecond;
-      for (let j = 0; j < width; j += 1) {
-        normal[i][j] += row[i] * row[j];
-      }
-    }
-  }
-  const inverse = invert(normal);
-  if (!inverse) {
-    return null;
-  }
-  const coefficients = inverse.map((row) => row.reduce((sum, value, index) => sum + value * right[index], 0));
-
-  let residualSquares = 0;
-  for (const sample of samples) {
-    const row = rowOf(sample);
-    const predicted = row.reduce((sum, value, index) => sum + value * coefficients[index], 0);
-    residualSquares += (sample.costSecondsPerSecond - predicted) ** 2;
-  }
-  const degreesOfFreedom = samples.length - width;
-  const variance = degreesOfFreedom > 0 ? residualSquares / degreesOfFreedom : 0;
-  const standardErrors = inverse.map((row, index) => Math.sqrt(Math.max(0, variance * row[index])));
-  return {
-    coefficients,
-    standardErrors,
-    residualRms: Math.sqrt(residualSquares / samples.length)
-  };
-}
-
-/**
- * Invert a small symmetric matrix by Gauss-Jordan, or null when it is singular.
- *
- * @param {number[][]} matrix
- * @returns {number[][] | null}
- */
-function invert(matrix) {
-  const size = matrix.length;
-  const work = matrix.map((row, index) => [
-    ...row,
-    ...Array.from({ length: size }, (_unused, column) => (column === index ? 1 : 0))
-  ]);
-  for (let column = 0; column < size; column += 1) {
-    let pivot = column;
-    for (let row = column + 1; row < size; row += 1) {
-      if (Math.abs(work[row][column]) > Math.abs(work[pivot][column])) {
-        pivot = row;
-      }
-    }
-    // Singular to the precision of the arithmetic: the columns are not
-    // independent, which is a statement about the clip set, not about the host.
-    if (Math.abs(work[pivot][column]) < 1e-12) {
-      return null;
-    }
-    [work[column], work[pivot]] = [work[pivot], work[column]];
-    const scale = work[column][column];
-    for (let k = 0; k < 2 * size; k += 1) {
-      work[column][k] /= scale;
-    }
-    for (let row = 0; row < size; row += 1) {
-      if (row === column) {
-        continue;
-      }
-      const factor = work[row][column];
-      for (let k = 0; k < 2 * size; k += 1) {
-        work[row][k] -= factor * work[column][k];
-      }
-    }
-  }
-  return work.map((row) => row.slice(size));
-}
-
-/**
- * Which measured family prices a source of this codec and depth.
- *
- * The families are the ones there are clips for. Anything else is priced as
- * H.264 — not because it decodes like H.264, but because that is the only
- * measurement of this host there is, and saying so in one place beats each
- * caller inventing its own fallback.
- *
- * 10-bit is its own family rather than a multiplier on the 8-bit one: the
- * samples are wider, the arithmetic is wider, and how much that costs is a
- * property of the machine, which is what is being measured.
- *
- * @param {{ codec?: string | null, bitDepth?: number | null }} source
- * @returns {string}
- */
-export function decodeFamilyOf(source) {
-  const codec = typeof source?.codec === "string" ? source.codec.trim().toLowerCase() : "";
-  const depth = Number(source?.bitDepth);
-  const tenBit = Number.isFinite(depth) && depth >= 10;
-  if (codec === "hevc" || codec === "h265" || codec === "x265") {
-    return tenBit ? "hevc10" : "hevc";
-  }
-  return "h264";
-}
-
-/**
- * What a model prices one source at.
- *
- * The model may carry a set of per-family fits (`families`) alongside the H.264
- * terms it also spreads at the top level, which is what a caller that knows
- * nothing about codecs still reads. When the source names a codec and that
- * family was measured, its own constants are used.
- *
- * @param {DecodeCostModel & { families?: Record<string, DecodeCostModel> }} model
- * @param {{ megapixelsPerSecond: number, megabitsPerSecond: number, codec?: string | null, bitDepth?: number | null }} source
- * @returns {number} Seconds of work per second of content.
- */
-export function decodeCostOf(model, source) {
-  const family = decodeFamilyOf(source);
-  const terms = model?.families?.[family] ?? model;
-  return (
-    terms.pixelTerm * source.megapixelsPerSecond +
-    terms.bitrateTerm * source.megabitsPerSecond +
-    terms.constantTerm
-  );
-}
+/**
+ * @file Fit the cost of decoding from measured clips — and say which terms the
+ * measurements actually determine.
+ *
+ * The model is `cost = pixelTerm × Mpixel/s + bitrateTerm × Mbit/s +
+ * constantTerm`, in seconds of work per second of content.
+ *
+ * What went wrong with the fit this replaces, measured 2026-08-17: three clips
+ * for three unknowns is an EXACT system, and two of those clips shared a pixel
+ * rate and differed only in bitrate. A system that near-singular does not fail
+ * loudly — it returns whatever satisfies the three equations, and on that boot
+ * it returned `0.007542 × Mpx/s + 0.000000 × Mbit/s + 0.0000 s/s`. The bitrate
+ * term and the constant were zero, so a film's own bitrate never entered its
+ * price, and the whole prediction was 1.8-2.2x optimistic against what the same
+ * file measured while playing.
+ *
+ * Two things are different here, and both are about honesty rather than
+ * accuracy:
+ *
+ *   - the system is OVER-determined (six clips, three unknowns) and solved by
+ *     least squares, so no single noisy reading decides a term;
+ *   - a term is published only if the measurements determine it. The test is
+ *     the coefficient against its OWN standard error: a term smaller than the
+ *     uncertainty in it has not been measured, and stating it as a number —
+ *     zero or otherwise — claims knowledge that is not there. It is dropped,
+ *     the remaining terms are fitted again, and the caller is told which shape
+ *     survived.
+ *
+ * There is no threshold to tune in that rule and no coefficient anywhere in
+ * this file. "Smaller than its own uncertainty" is a statement about the data,
+ * not a setting.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * One measured clip.
+ *
+ * @typedef {object} DecodeSample
+ * @property {number} megapixelsPerSecond - Width × height × frame rate ÷ 1e6.
+ * @property {number} megabitsPerSecond - The clip's own measured bitrate.
+ * @property {number} costSecondsPerSecond - Seconds of work per second of
+ *   content, from ffmpeg's own progress.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * The fitted model, with the shape the data supported.
+ *
+ * @typedef {object} DecodeCostModel
+ * @property {number} pixelTerm
+ * @property {number} bitrateTerm
+ * @property {number} constantTerm
+ * @property {string} shape - Which terms were determined.
+ * @property {string[]} dropped - Terms the measurements could not determine.
+ * @property {number} samples
+ * @property {number} residualRms - Typical disagreement between the fit and a
+ *   measurement, in the same units as the cost.
+ */
+
+/** Every term the model can carry, in column order. */
+const TERMS = ["pixels", "bitrate", "constant"];
+
+/**
+ * Fit the model, dropping any term the measurements do not determine.
+ *
+ * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
+ * @returns {DecodeCostModel | null} Null when nothing at all can be said: fewer
+ *   measurements than terms, or no measurable dependence on the source.
+ */
+export function fitDecodeCost(samples) {
+  const usable = (Array.isArray(samples) ? samples : []).filter(
+    (sample) =>
+      Number.isFinite(sample?.megapixelsPerSecond) &&
+      sample.megapixelsPerSecond > 0 &&
+      Number.isFinite(sample?.megabitsPerSecond) &&
+      sample.megabitsPerSecond >= 0 &&
+      Number.isFinite(sample?.costSecondsPerSecond) &&
+      sample.costSecondsPerSecond > 0
+  );
+  // Fitting three terms to three points is what produced the degenerate answer
+  // this file exists to prevent: it has no residual and therefore no way to
+  // notice that two of the points said the same thing.
+  if (usable.length < TERMS.length + 1) {
+    return null;
+  }
+
+  let columns = [...TERMS];
+  let dropped = [];
+  for (let attempt = 0; attempt < TERMS.length; attempt += 1) {
+    const fit = leastSquares(usable, columns);
+    if (!fit) {
+      return null;
+    }
+    // Which terms the data did not determine: a coefficient no larger than the
+    // uncertainty in it. Only one is dropped per pass — removing a column
+    // changes the uncertainty in the others, so the question has to be asked
+    // again of the smaller model.
+    const undetermined = columns
+      .map((name, index) => ({
+        name,
+        coefficient: fit.coefficients[index],
+        ratio: determination(usable, columns, name, fit.coefficients[index], fit.standardErrors[index], fit.residualRms)
+      }))
+      // The pixel term is the one relationship every measurement agrees on, and
+      // a model without it says nothing at all. If IT is undetermined the
+      // answer is no model, which the caller handles by pricing the encoder
+      // alone and refusing nothing.
+      // A NEGATIVE coefficient is undetermined whatever its ratio says. Every
+      // term here is physically non-negative — more pixels cannot cost less
+      // work, and neither can more bits — so a negative fit is noise winning
+      // over an effect, not a discovery about the host. Clamping it to zero
+      // instead, which the first version of this file did, publishes a zero
+      // that looks measured: exactly the dishonesty the module exists to
+      // remove.
+      .filter((term) => term.ratio < 1 || term.coefficient < 0)
+      .sort((left, right) => {
+        const negative = (term) => (term.coefficient < 0 ? 0 : 1);
+        return negative(left) - negative(right) || left.ratio - right.ratio;
+      });
+
+    if (undetermined.length === 0) {
+      return published(columns, fit, dropped, usable.length);
+    }
+    const weakest = undetermined[0].name;
+    if (weakest === "pixels") {
+      return null;
+    }
+    columns = columns.filter((name) => name !== weakest);
+    dropped = [...dropped, weakest];
+    if (columns.length === 0) {
+      return null;
+    }
+  }
+  return null;
+}
+
+
+/**
+ * How well one term is determined, as a ratio against 1.
+ *
+ * Two ways a term can fail to be measured, and both have to be asked, because
+ * each is blind where the other sees:
+ *
+ *   - **against the noise.** The term's effect across the range the clips
+ *     actually cover — its coefficient times the spread of its own column — has
+ *     to be larger than the typical disagreement between the fit and the
+ *     measurements. A term whose whole contribution is smaller than the scatter
+ *     was not measured; it was fitted to the scatter.
+ *   - **against the arithmetic.** When a fit happens to be exact the scatter is
+ *     zero, every standard error vanishes, and a coefficient of 7e-18 — which
+ *     is how double-precision writes "nothing" — passes any test framed as a
+ *     ratio. So the effect must also be larger than what the arithmetic itself
+ *     can represent at this scale. That floor is a property of the numbers, not
+ *     a setting: it moves with the size of the measurements.
+ *
+ * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
+ * @param {string[]} columns
+ * @param {string} name
+ * @param {number} coefficient
+ * @param {number} standardError
+ * @param {number} residualRms
+ * @returns {number} Below 1 means the measurements do not determine this term.
+ */
+function determination(samples, columns, name, coefficient, standardError, residualRms) {
+  const values = samples.map((sample) => {
+    if (name === "pixels") {
+      return sample.megapixelsPerSecond;
+    }
+    if (name === "bitrate") {
+      return sample.megabitsPerSecond;
+    }
+    return 1;
+  });
+  const spread = name === "constant" ? 1 : Math.max(...values) - Math.min(...values);
+  const effect = Math.abs(coefficient) * spread;
+  const meanCost = samples.reduce((sum, sample) => sum + sample.costSecondsPerSecond, 0) / samples.length;
+  const arithmeticFloor = Math.abs(meanCost) * Number.EPSILON * samples.length * columns.length;
+  const noiseFloor = Math.max(residualRms, arithmeticFloor);
+  const againstNoise = noiseFloor > 0 ? effect / noiseFloor : Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY;
+  const againstError = standardError > 0 ? Math.abs(coefficient) / standardError : Number.POSITIVE_INFINITY;
+  return Math.min(againstNoise, againstError);
+}
+
+/**
+ * Assemble the answer, with absent terms as zero — and `dropped` saying that
+ * the zero means "not measured" rather than "measured to be nothing".
+ *
+ * @param {string[]} columns
+ * @param {{ coefficients: number[], residualRms: number }} fit
+ * @param {string[]} dropped
+ * @param {number} samples
+ * @returns {DecodeCostModel | null}
+ */
+function published(columns, fit, dropped, samples) {
+  const value = (name) => {
+    const index = columns.indexOf(name);
+    return index < 0 ? 0 : fit.coefficients[index];
+  };
+  const pixelTerm = value("pixels");
+  // A negative price for pixels is not a host being unusual — it is noise
+  // larger than the effect, and carrying it would price a bigger picture as
+  // cheaper than a smaller one.
+  if (!(pixelTerm > 0)) {
+    return null;
+  }
+  const constantTerm = value("constant");
+  return {
+    pixelTerm,
+    bitrateTerm: Math.max(0, value("bitrate")),
+    // A negative constant would make a small enough source free, which no
+    // measurement here supports: it is the fitted line crossing below zero
+    // outside the range that was measured.
+    constantTerm: Math.max(0, constantTerm),
+    shape: columns.join("+"),
+    dropped,
+    samples,
+    residualRms: fit.residualRms
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Least squares over the named columns, with the standard error of each
+ * coefficient.
+ *
+ * Solved through the normal equations. The matrix is at most 3×3 and the
+ * columns are of similar magnitude once a clip set varies them deliberately,
+ * which is exactly what the set is designed for.
+ *
+ * @param {DecodeSample[]} samples
+ * @param {string[]} columns
+ * @returns {{ coefficients: number[], standardErrors: number[], residualRms: number } | null}
+ */
+function leastSquares(samples, columns) {
+  const rowOf = (sample) =>
+    columns.map((name) => {
+      if (name === "pixels") {
+        return sample.megapixelsPerSecond;
+      }
+      if (name === "bitrate") {
+        return sample.megabitsPerSecond;
+      }
+      return 1;
+    });
+  const width = columns.length;
+  const normal = Array.from({ length: width }, () => new Array(width).fill(0));
+  const right = new Array(width).fill(0);
+  for (const sample of samples) {
+    const row = rowOf(sample);
+    for (let i = 0; i < width; i += 1) {
+      right[i] += row[i] * sample.costSecondsPerSecond;
+      for (let j = 0; j < width; j += 1) {
+        normal[i][j] += row[i] * row[j];
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  const inverse = invert(normal);
+  if (!inverse) {
+    return null;
+  }
+  const coefficients = inverse.map((row) => row.reduce((sum, value, index) => sum + value * right[index], 0));
+
+  let residualSquares = 0;
+  for (const sample of samples) {
+    const row = rowOf(sample);
+    const predicted = row.reduce((sum, value, index) => sum + value * coefficients[index], 0);
+    residualSquares += (sample.costSecondsPerSecond - predicted) ** 2;
+  }
+  const degreesOfFreedom = samples.length - width;
+  const variance = degreesOfFreedom > 0 ? residualSquares / degreesOfFreedom : 0;
+  const standardErrors = inverse.map((row, index) => Math.sqrt(Math.max(0, variance * row[index])));
+  return {
+    coefficients,
+    standardErrors,
+    residualRms: Math.sqrt(residualSquares / samples.length)
+  };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Invert a small symmetric matrix by Gauss-Jordan, or null when it is singular.
+ *
+ * @param {number[][]} matrix
+ * @returns {number[][] | null}
+ */
+function invert(matrix) {
+  const size = matrix.length;
+  const work = matrix.map((row, index) => [
+    ...row,
+    ...Array.from({ length: size }, (_unused, column) => (column === index ? 1 : 0))
+  ]);
+  for (let column = 0; column < size; column += 1) {
+    let pivot = column;
+    for (let row = column + 1; row < size; row += 1) {
+      if (Math.abs(work[row][column]) > Math.abs(work[pivot][column])) {
+        pivot = row;
+      }
+    }
+    // Singular to the precision of the arithmetic: the columns are not
+    // independent, which is a statement about the clip set, not about the host.
+    if (Math.abs(work[pivot][column]) < 1e-12) {
+      return null;
+    }
+    [work[column], work[pivot]] = [work[pivot], work[column]];
+    const scale = work[column][column];
+    for (let k = 0; k < 2 * size; k += 1) {
+      work[column][k] /= scale;
+    }
+    for (let row = 0; row < size; row += 1) {
+      if (row === column) {
+        continue;
+      }
+      const factor = work[row][column];
+      for (let k = 0; k < 2 * size; k += 1) {
+        work[row][k] -= factor * work[column][k];
+      }
+    }
+  }
+  return work.map((row) => row.slice(size));
+}
+
+/**
+ * Which measured family prices a source of this codec and depth.
+ *
+ * The families are the ones there are clips for. Anything else is priced as
+ * H.264 — not because it decodes like H.264, but because that is the only
+ * measurement of this host there is, and saying so in one place beats each
+ * caller inventing its own fallback.
+ *
+ * 10-bit is its own family rather than a multiplier on the 8-bit one: the
+ * samples are wider, the arithmetic is wider, and how much that costs is a
+ * property of the machine, which is what is being measured.
+ *
+ * @param {{ codec?: string | null, bitDepth?: number | null }} source
+ * @returns {string}
+ */
+export function decodeFamilyOf(source) {
+  const codec = typeof source?.codec === "string" ? source.codec.trim().toLowerCase() : "";
+  const depth = Number(source?.bitDepth);
+  const tenBit = Number.isFinite(depth) && depth >= 10;
+  if (codec === "hevc" || codec === "h265" || codec === "x265") {
+    return tenBit ? "hevc10" : "hevc";
+  }
+  return "h264";
+}
+
+/**
+ * What a model prices one source at.
+ *
+ * The model may carry a set of per-family fits (`families`) alongside the H.264
+ * terms it also spreads at the top level, which is what a caller that knows
+ * nothing about codecs still reads. When the source names a codec and that
+ * family was measured, its own constants are used.
+ *
+ * @param {DecodeCostModel & { families?: Record<string, DecodeCostModel> }} model
+ * @param {{ megapixelsPerSecond: number, megabitsPerSecond: number, codec?: string | null, bitDepth?: number | null }} source
+ * @returns {number} Seconds of work per second of content.
+ */
+export function decodeCostOf(model, source) {
+  const family = decodeFamilyOf(source);
+  const terms = model?.families?.[family] ?? model;
+  return (
+    terms.pixelTerm * source.megapixelsPerSecond +
+    terms.bitrateTerm * source.megabitsPerSecond +
+    terms.constantTerm
+  );
+}