@torrent-tv/proxy 2.87.10 → 2.87.11

package/test/delivery-probe.test.js

@@ -1,393 +1,393 @@
-import test from "node:test";
-import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-
-import {
-  allowedGap,
-  probeWedgeIsCertain,
-  readProbeState,
-  PROBE_INTERVAL_MS,
-  UNRELIABLE_LABEL
-} from "../services/transport/delivery-probe.js";
-
-const ORDERED = ["proxy", "proxy-control"];
-const ALL = [...ORDERED, UNRELIABLE_LABEL];
-
-/**
- * @param {Record<string, number>} seen
- * @param {object} [overrides]
- */
-function state(seen, overrides = {}) {
-  const allowed = {};
-  for (const label of overrides.labels ?? ALL) {
-    allowed[label] = 3;
-  }
-  return {
-    seq: 100,
-    seen,
-    labels: ALL,
-    echoes: 5,
-    echoAgeMs: 400,
-    allowed,
-    ...overrides
-  };
-}
-
-test("every channel current reads as flowing", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(state({ proxy: 100, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 100 }));
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-});
-
-test("a lag shorter than the verdict window is still flowing", () => {
-  const behind = 100 - 3;
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: behind, "proxy-control": behind, "proxy-fast": 100 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-});
-
-test("ordered channels behind while the unordered one keeps up names a stuck stream", () => {
-  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 100 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "stream-stuck");
-  // The numbers that produced the verdict must be in the line beside it.
-  assert.match(detail, /proxy=40\(gap 60 of 3\)/);
-});
-
-test("every channel behind names the association", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
-});
-
-test("without the unordered channel the verdict says it cannot compare", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41 }, { labels: ORDERED })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "ordered-behind-no-comparison");
-});
-
-test("a stale echo means the reverse direction went too", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { echoAgeMs: 30_000 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
-});
-
-test("before the first echo nothing is claimed", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(state({}, { echoes: 0, echoAgeMs: null }));
-  assert.equal(verdict, "no-echo-yet");
-});
-
-test("a channel that has never reported counts as behind, not as unknown", () => {
-  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
-    state({ "proxy-fast": 100 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "stream-stuck");
-  assert.match(detail, /proxy=\?\(gap \? of 3\)/);
-});
-
-test("the allowance is the queue's own drain time, not a chosen number", () => {
-  // 8 MB queued at 8 MB/s is one second of draining; probes go twice a second,
-  // so two of them may legitimately be outstanding, plus the round trip.
-  assert.equal(
-    allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 8 * 1024 * 1024, bytesPerSecond: 8 * 1024 * 1024, rttMs: 0 }),
-    Math.ceil(1000 / PROBE_INTERVAL_MS)
-  );
-  // An empty queue still allows the one probe that is always in flight.
-  assert.equal(allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 8 * 1024 * 1024, rttMs: 0 }), 1);
-  // The round trip counts: the echo has to come back too.
-  assert.ok(
-    allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 1024, rttMs: 2000 }) >
-      allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 1024, rttMs: 0 })
-  );
-});
-
-test("with no rate measured nothing is claimed", () => {
-  assert.equal(allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 1024, bytesPerSecond: 0, rttMs: 10 }), null);
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { allowed: {} })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "no-rate-yet");
-});
-
-test("a burst big enough to explain the lag is not called a stopped association", () => {
-  // The 2026-08-26 false positive: all three channels at gap 7 while 150 Mbps
-  // crossed the association. 64 MB queued at 18 MB/s is three and a half
-  // seconds of draining, which is seven probe intervals.
-  const allowance = allowedGap({
-    queuedBytes: 64 * 1024 * 1024,
-    bytesPerSecond: 18 * 1024 * 1024,
-    rttMs: 16
-  });
-  assert.ok(allowance >= 7);
-  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, allowance]));
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 93, "proxy-control": 93, "proxy-fast": 93 }, { allowed })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-});
-
-test("the peer's own answering cadence counts toward the allowance", () => {
-  // Field case 2026-08-27: queues empty, 3.4 MB/s crossing, tab hidden so the
-  // browser echoed about once a second. Without the peer's cadence the
-  // allowance is one probe and every other line read `association-stopped`.
-  const withoutCadence = allowedGap({
-    queuedBytes: 0,
-    bytesPerSecond: 3.4 * 1024 * 1024,
-    rttMs: 9
-  });
-  assert.equal(withoutCadence, 1);
-  const withCadence = allowedGap({
-    queuedBytes: 0,
-    bytesPerSecond: 3.4 * 1024 * 1024,
-    rttMs: 9,
-    echoIntervalMs: 1000
-  });
-  assert.ok(withCadence >= 3, `a second of cadence must allow more than ${withCadence}`);
-  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, withCadence]));
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 98, "proxy-control": 98, "proxy-fast": 98 }, { allowed, echoAgeMs: 977 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-});
-
-test("a stale echo is judged against the peer's cadence, not a fixed half second", () => {
-  // The same numbers with the cadence unknown must still be able to say the
-  // reverse direction is gone — the bound rises with the cadence, it does not
-  // disappear.
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 99, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 99 }, { echoAgeMs: 60_000, echoStaleMs: 2000 })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
-});
-
-test("bytes still arriving outrank the probe gaps — the cushion fill is not a wedge", () => {
-  // The field shape of 2026-08-28: every queue at 0 B, so the allowance is
-  // small, the probes are far behind because the browser is busy pulling two
-  // minutes of film, and the association is perfectly healthy. Before the peer's
-  // own byte counter was consulted this read as `association-stopped`, four
-  // times in the first two minutes of a session nobody was troubled by.
-  const state = {
-    seq: 88,
-    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
-    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
-    echoes: 40,
-    echoAgeMs: 1305,
-    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
-    echoStaleMs: 6000,
-    peerBytesAdvancing: true
-  };
-  const reading = readProbeState(state);
-  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "flowing");
-  assert.match(reading.detail, /peerBytes=advancing/);
-});
-
-test("the same gaps with the peer's counter STILL are the wedge", () => {
-  // One field changes, and it is the one that says whether anything is
-  // arriving. This is the shape of a real freeze: probes behind, and the far
-  // end receiving nothing.
-  const reading = readProbeState({
-    seq: 88,
-    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
-    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
-    echoes: 40,
-    echoAgeMs: 1305,
-    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
-    echoStaleMs: 6000,
-    peerBytesAdvancing: false
-  });
-  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
-  assert.match(reading.detail, /peerBytes=still/);
-});
-
-test("a browser that does not report its bytes is judged as before", () => {
-  // The term says nothing rather than guessing, and the rule falls back.
-  const reading = readProbeState({
-    seq: 88,
-    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
-    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
-    echoes: 40,
-    echoAgeMs: 1305,
-    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
-    echoStaleMs: 6000,
-    peerBytesAdvancing: null
-  });
-  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
-  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerBytes=/);
-});
-
-test("a frozen tab's own event-loop delay counts toward the allowance", () => {
-  // Field case 2026-09-03, session 03f211b8. The viewer paused at 15:24:21 with
-  // 121.5 s buffered; the tab went hidden at 15:24:35 and its event loop fell
-  // behind — loopLag 681 → 1881 → 4297 → 5957 ms. At 15:26:05 the probes read
-  // `gap 12 of 11` and printed `association-stopped`, the ring files were kept
-  // and a 180 s capture was taken; seven seconds later the same connection read
-  // `flowing`. Nothing had stopped: the browser simply could not run the timer
-  // that answers a probe.
-  // The line printed `gap 12 of 11`; the queue was empty and the round trip
-  // 162 ms, so the cadence term is whatever makes the allowance 11.
-  const measured = {
-    queuedBytes: 0,
-    bytesPerSecond: 300,
-    rttMs: 162,
-    echoIntervalMs: 5000
-  };
-  const withoutLag = allowedGap(measured);
-  const withLag = allowedGap({ ...measured, peerLoopLagMs: 1881 });
-  assert.equal(withoutLag, 11, `the field allowance was 11, not ${withoutLag}`);
-  assert.ok(withLag > 12, `a gap of 12 must fit inside ${withLag}`);
-  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, withLag]));
-  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 9547, "proxy-control": 9547, "proxy-fast": 9547 },
-      {
-        seq: 9559,
-        allowed,
-        echoAgeMs: 5963,
-        echoStaleMs: 11 * PROBE_INTERVAL_MS + 162 + 5000 + 1881,
-        peerBytesAdvancing: false,
-        peerLoopLagMs: 1881,
-        peerVisibility: "hidden"
-      }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-  assert.match(detail, /peerLoopLag=1881ms/);
-  assert.match(detail, /peerTab=hidden/);
-});
-
-test("the peer's lag widens the bound on a stale echo without removing it", () => {
-  // The same term must not make `reverse-direction-gone` unreachable: a peer
-  // that has genuinely gone silent is still silent for far longer than its own
-  // loop delay explains.
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 99, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 99 },
-      {
-        echoAgeMs: 120_000,
-        echoStaleMs: 5500 + 162 + 1000 + 4297,
-        peerLoopLagMs: 4297,
-        peerVisibility: "hidden"
-      }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
-});
-
-test("a peer that reports no loop delay is judged exactly as before", () => {
-  const reading = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 90, "proxy-control": 90, "proxy-fast": 90 }, { peerBytesAdvancing: false })
-  );
-  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
-  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerLoopLag=/);
-  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerTab=/);
-});
-
-test("a quiet stretch shorter than a legitimate report is not a wedge", () => {
-  // Field 2026-09-11: two captures of 180 s each, triggered at `wedged 1s` and
-  // `wedged 2s`, on a connection with `rtt=5ms`, every queue at 0 B and the
-  // viewer watching. In its first minutes a connection has shown no healthy gap
-  // at all, and the floor under "longer than anything healthy" was a single
-  // probe interval — 500 ms — so any quiet moment beat it.
-  // Both cadences plus the crossing: a probe sent just after the peer composed
-  // a report shows up only in the next one.
-  const legitimateReportMs = 500 + 500 + 12 + 0;
-  assert.equal(
-    probeWedgeIsCertain({ stuckForMs: 1000, longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0, legitimateReportMs }).isCertain,
-    false,
-    "a second of quiet is shorter than one legitimate report and says nothing"
-  );
-  // And what the detector exists for is untouched: a counter frozen for
-  // minutes is far past any report this connection could legitimately owe.
-  assert.equal(
-    probeWedgeIsCertain({ stuckForMs: 60_000, longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0, legitimateReportMs }).isCertain,
-    true
-  );
-  // A peer whose event loop is late is owed that time as well.
-  assert.equal(
-    probeWedgeIsCertain({
-      stuckForMs: 3000,
-      longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0,
-      legitimateReportMs: 500 + 12 + 5000
-    }).isCertain,
-    false,
-    "a peer frozen for five seconds cannot answer sooner than that"
-  );
-});
-
-test("what is behind is judged in time, not in probes", () => {
-  // The same probe goes down every channel including the one carrying the film,
-  // and SCTP schedules per association — so a probe waits behind queued video
-  // exactly as a segment does. Counting outstanding probes therefore measures
-  // the queue, not the association, which is why the count is only printed now.
-  const behind = { proxy: 800, "proxy-control": 800, "proxy-fast": 800 };
-  const mayWait = { proxy: 2000, "proxy-control": 2000, "proxy-fast": 2000 };
-
-  // Far behind in probes, well within the time its own queue is allowed.
-  const healthy = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
-      { behindMs: behind, allowedWaitMs: mayWait }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(healthy.verdict, "flowing");
-  assert.match(healthy.detail, /800ms of 2000ms/, "both readings belong in the line");
-
-  // The same gaps, the same allowance, and the probe is older than the queue
-  // could account for: that is the association and not the burst.
-  const wedged = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
-      {
-        behindMs: { proxy: 9000, "proxy-control": 9000, "proxy-fast": 9000 },
-        allowedWaitMs: mayWait
-      }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(wedged.verdict, "association-stopped");
-});
-
-test("with no send time recorded the count still decides", () => {
-  // A probe older than the history kept, or a connection that has just begun:
-  // the reading is absent rather than wrong, and the old comparison stands.
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { behindMs: {}, allowedWaitMs: {} })
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
-});
-
-test("the measured one-way time is preferred over the age of the report", () => {
-  // With the clocks reconciled, the proxy knows how long the probe itself took
-  // to reach the peer. The age of the newest reported probe is the same thing
-  // plus the peer's reporting cadence and the way back — so where both are
-  // known, the measurement wins and its allowance carries neither.
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
-      {
-        // The age says far behind against its allowance...
-        behindMs: { proxy: 9000, "proxy-control": 9000, "proxy-fast": 9000 },
-        allowedWaitMs: { proxy: 2000, "proxy-control": 2000, "proxy-fast": 2000 },
-        // ...while the probe itself took 300 ms of the 900 its queue may take.
-        oneWayMs: { proxy: 300, "proxy-control": 300, "proxy-fast": 300 },
-        allowedOneWayMs: { proxy: 900, "proxy-control": 900, "proxy-fast": 900 }
-      }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
-});
-
-test("a one-way time past what the queue can account for is the association", () => {
-  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
-    state(
-      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
-      {
-        oneWayMs: { proxy: 12_000, "proxy-control": 12_000, "proxy-fast": 12_000 },
-        allowedOneWayMs: { proxy: 900, "proxy-control": 900, "proxy-fast": 900 }
-      }
-    )
-  );
-  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
-});
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+
+import {
+  allowedGap,
+  probeWedgeIsCertain,
+  readProbeState,
+  PROBE_INTERVAL_MS,
+  UNRELIABLE_LABEL
+} from "../services/transport/delivery-probe.js";
+
+const ORDERED = ["proxy", "proxy-control"];
+const ALL = [...ORDERED, UNRELIABLE_LABEL];
+
+/**
+ * @param {Record<string, number>} seen
+ * @param {object} [overrides]
+ */
+function state(seen, overrides = {}) {
+  const allowed = {};
+  for (const label of overrides.labels ?? ALL) {
+    allowed[label] = 3;
+  }
+  return {
+    seq: 100,
+    seen,
+    labels: ALL,
+    echoes: 5,
+    echoAgeMs: 400,
+    allowed,
+    ...overrides
+  };
+}
+
+test("every channel current reads as flowing", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(state({ proxy: 100, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 100 }));
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+});
+
+test("a lag shorter than the verdict window is still flowing", () => {
+  const behind = 100 - 3;
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: behind, "proxy-control": behind, "proxy-fast": 100 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+});
+
+test("ordered channels behind while the unordered one keeps up names a stuck stream", () => {
+  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 100 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "stream-stuck");
+  // The numbers that produced the verdict must be in the line beside it.
+  assert.match(detail, /proxy=40\(gap 60 of 3\)/);
+});
+
+test("every channel behind names the association", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
+});
+
+test("without the unordered channel the verdict says it cannot compare", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41 }, { labels: ORDERED })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "ordered-behind-no-comparison");
+});
+
+test("a stale echo means the reverse direction went too", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { echoAgeMs: 30_000 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
+});
+
+test("before the first echo nothing is claimed", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(state({}, { echoes: 0, echoAgeMs: null }));
+  assert.equal(verdict, "no-echo-yet");
+});
+
+test("a channel that has never reported counts as behind, not as unknown", () => {
+  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
+    state({ "proxy-fast": 100 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "stream-stuck");
+  assert.match(detail, /proxy=\?\(gap \? of 3\)/);
+});
+
+test("the allowance is the queue's own drain time, not a chosen number", () => {
+  // 8 MB queued at 8 MB/s is one second of draining; probes go twice a second,
+  // so two of them may legitimately be outstanding, plus the round trip.
+  assert.equal(
+    allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 8 * 1024 * 1024, bytesPerSecond: 8 * 1024 * 1024, rttMs: 0 }),
+    Math.ceil(1000 / PROBE_INTERVAL_MS)
+  );
+  // An empty queue still allows the one probe that is always in flight.
+  assert.equal(allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 8 * 1024 * 1024, rttMs: 0 }), 1);
+  // The round trip counts: the echo has to come back too.
+  assert.ok(
+    allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 1024, rttMs: 2000 }) >
+      allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 0, bytesPerSecond: 1024, rttMs: 0 })
+  );
+});
+
+test("with no rate measured nothing is claimed", () => {
+  assert.equal(allowedGap({ queuedBytes: 1024, bytesPerSecond: 0, rttMs: 10 }), null);
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { allowed: {} })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "no-rate-yet");
+});
+
+test("a burst big enough to explain the lag is not called a stopped association", () => {
+  // The 2026-08-26 false positive: all three channels at gap 7 while 150 Mbps
+  // crossed the association. 64 MB queued at 18 MB/s is three and a half
+  // seconds of draining, which is seven probe intervals.
+  const allowance = allowedGap({
+    queuedBytes: 64 * 1024 * 1024,
+    bytesPerSecond: 18 * 1024 * 1024,
+    rttMs: 16
+  });
+  assert.ok(allowance >= 7);
+  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, allowance]));
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 93, "proxy-control": 93, "proxy-fast": 93 }, { allowed })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+});
+
+test("the peer's own answering cadence counts toward the allowance", () => {
+  // Field case 2026-08-27: queues empty, 3.4 MB/s crossing, tab hidden so the
+  // browser echoed about once a second. Without the peer's cadence the
+  // allowance is one probe and every other line read `association-stopped`.
+  const withoutCadence = allowedGap({
+    queuedBytes: 0,
+    bytesPerSecond: 3.4 * 1024 * 1024,
+    rttMs: 9
+  });
+  assert.equal(withoutCadence, 1);
+  const withCadence = allowedGap({
+    queuedBytes: 0,
+    bytesPerSecond: 3.4 * 1024 * 1024,
+    rttMs: 9,
+    echoIntervalMs: 1000
+  });
+  assert.ok(withCadence >= 3, `a second of cadence must allow more than ${withCadence}`);
+  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, withCadence]));
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 98, "proxy-control": 98, "proxy-fast": 98 }, { allowed, echoAgeMs: 977 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+});
+
+test("a stale echo is judged against the peer's cadence, not a fixed half second", () => {
+  // The same numbers with the cadence unknown must still be able to say the
+  // reverse direction is gone — the bound rises with the cadence, it does not
+  // disappear.
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 99, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 99 }, { echoAgeMs: 60_000, echoStaleMs: 2000 })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
+});
+
+test("bytes still arriving outrank the probe gaps — the cushion fill is not a wedge", () => {
+  // The field shape of 2026-08-28: every queue at 0 B, so the allowance is
+  // small, the probes are far behind because the browser is busy pulling two
+  // minutes of film, and the association is perfectly healthy. Before the peer's
+  // own byte counter was consulted this read as `association-stopped`, four
+  // times in the first two minutes of a session nobody was troubled by.
+  const state = {
+    seq: 88,
+    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
+    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
+    echoes: 40,
+    echoAgeMs: 1305,
+    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
+    echoStaleMs: 6000,
+    peerBytesAdvancing: true
+  };
+  const reading = readProbeState(state);
+  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "flowing");
+  assert.match(reading.detail, /peerBytes=advancing/);
+});
+
+test("the same gaps with the peer's counter STILL are the wedge", () => {
+  // One field changes, and it is the one that says whether anything is
+  // arriving. This is the shape of a real freeze: probes behind, and the far
+  // end receiving nothing.
+  const reading = readProbeState({
+    seq: 88,
+    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
+    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
+    echoes: 40,
+    echoAgeMs: 1305,
+    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
+    echoStaleMs: 6000,
+    peerBytesAdvancing: false
+  });
+  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
+  assert.match(reading.detail, /peerBytes=still/);
+});
+
+test("a browser that does not report its bytes is judged as before", () => {
+  // The term says nothing rather than guessing, and the rule falls back.
+  const reading = readProbeState({
+    seq: 88,
+    seen: { proxy: 78, "proxy-control": 78, "proxy-fast": 78 },
+    labels: ["proxy", "proxy-control", "proxy-fast"],
+    echoes: 40,
+    echoAgeMs: 1305,
+    allowed: { proxy: 9, "proxy-control": 9, "proxy-fast": 9 },
+    echoStaleMs: 6000,
+    peerBytesAdvancing: null
+  });
+  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
+  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerBytes=/);
+});
+
+test("a frozen tab's own event-loop delay counts toward the allowance", () => {
+  // Field case 2026-09-03, session 03f211b8. The viewer paused at 15:24:21 with
+  // 121.5 s buffered; the tab went hidden at 15:24:35 and its event loop fell
+  // behind — loopLag 681 → 1881 → 4297 → 5957 ms. At 15:26:05 the probes read
+  // `gap 12 of 11` and printed `association-stopped`, the ring files were kept
+  // and a 180 s capture was taken; seven seconds later the same connection read
+  // `flowing`. Nothing had stopped: the browser simply could not run the timer
+  // that answers a probe.
+  // The line printed `gap 12 of 11`; the queue was empty and the round trip
+  // 162 ms, so the cadence term is whatever makes the allowance 11.
+  const measured = {
+    queuedBytes: 0,
+    bytesPerSecond: 300,
+    rttMs: 162,
+    echoIntervalMs: 5000
+  };
+  const withoutLag = allowedGap(measured);
+  const withLag = allowedGap({ ...measured, peerLoopLagMs: 1881 });
+  assert.equal(withoutLag, 11, `the field allowance was 11, not ${withoutLag}`);
+  assert.ok(withLag > 12, `a gap of 12 must fit inside ${withLag}`);
+  const allowed = Object.fromEntries(ALL.map((label) => [label, withLag]));
+  const { verdict, detail } = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 9547, "proxy-control": 9547, "proxy-fast": 9547 },
+      {
+        seq: 9559,
+        allowed,
+        echoAgeMs: 5963,
+        echoStaleMs: 11 * PROBE_INTERVAL_MS + 162 + 5000 + 1881,
+        peerBytesAdvancing: false,
+        peerLoopLagMs: 1881,
+        peerVisibility: "hidden"
+      }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+  assert.match(detail, /peerLoopLag=1881ms/);
+  assert.match(detail, /peerTab=hidden/);
+});
+
+test("the peer's lag widens the bound on a stale echo without removing it", () => {
+  // The same term must not make `reverse-direction-gone` unreachable: a peer
+  // that has genuinely gone silent is still silent for far longer than its own
+  // loop delay explains.
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 99, "proxy-control": 99, "proxy-fast": 99 },
+      {
+        echoAgeMs: 120_000,
+        echoStaleMs: 5500 + 162 + 1000 + 4297,
+        peerLoopLagMs: 4297,
+        peerVisibility: "hidden"
+      }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "reverse-direction-gone");
+});
+
+test("a peer that reports no loop delay is judged exactly as before", () => {
+  const reading = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 90, "proxy-control": 90, "proxy-fast": 90 }, { peerBytesAdvancing: false })
+  );
+  assert.equal(reading.verdict, "association-stopped");
+  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerLoopLag=/);
+  assert.doesNotMatch(reading.detail, /peerTab=/);
+});
+
+test("a quiet stretch shorter than a legitimate report is not a wedge", () => {
+  // Field 2026-09-11: two captures of 180 s each, triggered at `wedged 1s` and
+  // `wedged 2s`, on a connection with `rtt=5ms`, every queue at 0 B and the
+  // viewer watching. In its first minutes a connection has shown no healthy gap
+  // at all, and the floor under "longer than anything healthy" was a single
+  // probe interval — 500 ms — so any quiet moment beat it.
+  // Both cadences plus the crossing: a probe sent just after the peer composed
+  // a report shows up only in the next one.
+  const legitimateReportMs = 500 + 500 + 12 + 0;
+  assert.equal(
+    probeWedgeIsCertain({ stuckForMs: 1000, longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0, legitimateReportMs }).isCertain,
+    false,
+    "a second of quiet is shorter than one legitimate report and says nothing"
+  );
+  // And what the detector exists for is untouched: a counter frozen for
+  // minutes is far past any report this connection could legitimately owe.
+  assert.equal(
+    probeWedgeIsCertain({ stuckForMs: 60_000, longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0, legitimateReportMs }).isCertain,
+    true
+  );
+  // A peer whose event loop is late is owed that time as well.
+  assert.equal(
+    probeWedgeIsCertain({
+      stuckForMs: 3000,
+      longestHealthySeenGapMs: 0,
+      legitimateReportMs: 500 + 12 + 5000
+    }).isCertain,
+    false,
+    "a peer frozen for five seconds cannot answer sooner than that"
+  );
+});
+
+test("what is behind is judged in time, not in probes", () => {
+  // The same probe goes down every channel including the one carrying the film,
+  // and SCTP schedules per association — so a probe waits behind queued video
+  // exactly as a segment does. Counting outstanding probes therefore measures
+  // the queue, not the association, which is why the count is only printed now.
+  const behind = { proxy: 800, "proxy-control": 800, "proxy-fast": 800 };
+  const mayWait = { proxy: 2000, "proxy-control": 2000, "proxy-fast": 2000 };
+
+  // Far behind in probes, well within the time its own queue is allowed.
+  const healthy = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
+      { behindMs: behind, allowedWaitMs: mayWait }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(healthy.verdict, "flowing");
+  assert.match(healthy.detail, /800ms of 2000ms/, "both readings belong in the line");
+
+  // The same gaps, the same allowance, and the probe is older than the queue
+  // could account for: that is the association and not the burst.
+  const wedged = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
+      {
+        behindMs: { proxy: 9000, "proxy-control": 9000, "proxy-fast": 9000 },
+        allowedWaitMs: mayWait
+      }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(wedged.verdict, "association-stopped");
+});
+
+test("with no send time recorded the count still decides", () => {
+  // A probe older than the history kept, or a connection that has just begun:
+  // the reading is absent rather than wrong, and the old comparison stands.
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state({ proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 }, { behindMs: {}, allowedWaitMs: {} })
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
+});
+
+test("the measured one-way time is preferred over the age of the report", () => {
+  // With the clocks reconciled, the proxy knows how long the probe itself took
+  // to reach the peer. The age of the newest reported probe is the same thing
+  // plus the peer's reporting cadence and the way back — so where both are
+  // known, the measurement wins and its allowance carries neither.
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
+      {
+        // The age says far behind against its allowance...
+        behindMs: { proxy: 9000, "proxy-control": 9000, "proxy-fast": 9000 },
+        allowedWaitMs: { proxy: 2000, "proxy-control": 2000, "proxy-fast": 2000 },
+        // ...while the probe itself took 300 ms of the 900 its queue may take.
+        oneWayMs: { proxy: 300, "proxy-control": 300, "proxy-fast": 300 },
+        allowedOneWayMs: { proxy: 900, "proxy-control": 900, "proxy-fast": 900 }
+      }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "flowing");
+});
+
+test("a one-way time past what the queue can account for is the association", () => {
+  const { verdict } = readProbeState(
+    state(
+      { proxy: 40, "proxy-control": 41, "proxy-fast": 42 },
+      {
+        oneWayMs: { proxy: 12_000, "proxy-control": 12_000, "proxy-fast": 12_000 },
+        allowedOneWayMs: { proxy: 900, "proxy-control": 900, "proxy-fast": 900 }
+      }
+    )
+  );
+  assert.equal(verdict, "association-stopped");
+});