@jaimevalasek/aioson 1.8.0 → 1.9.1

package/template/.aioson/skills/marketing/references/headline-matrix.md

@@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
+# Headline Matrix — 8 Systematic Headline Types
+
+> **Loading rule:** Load when generating a **set of headline variations** (Mode 6 campaign package, ad sets needing 5+ hooks, A/B testing). For a single headline embedded in a 5-Act page, `patterns.md` (6 formula patterns) is usually enough. This file teaches headline types **by intent**; `patterns.md` teaches headline types **by formula**. They complement each other.
+
+This matrix gives you eight distinct angles. The point is **diversity of attack** — when you generate variations, you don't want eight ways of saying the same thing. You want eight different psychological doors into the same prospect.
+
+---
+
+## The 8 types
+
+| # | Type | Core mechanism | When it works best |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| 1 | Benefit | Lead with the outcome | Solution-aware audience; clear value prop |
+| 2 | Curiosity | Open a knowledge gap | Cold/distracted audience; novel mechanism |
+| 3 | Problem-Agitation | Surface their pain | Problem-aware audience with felt urgency |
+| 4 | Social Proof | Borrow others' credibility | New brand; skeptical buyer; herd mentality |
+| 5 | Urgency / FOMO | Time/scarcity pressure | Bottom-of-funnel; ready buyers stalling |
+| 6 | How-To | Promise actionable knowledge | Searchers; educational content; lead magnets |
+| 7 | List / Number | Promise structured payoff | Skimmers; content hubs; comparison shoppers |
+| 8 | Question | Force self-identification | Top of funnel; persona-targeted segments |
+
+---
+
+## 1. Benefit Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** the headline IS the promised outcome. No mystery, no hook. Just the result.
+
+**Formula:** `[Specific outcome] + [in/without/even if qualifier]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "Get clear skin in 30 days — even if everything else has failed"
+- "Learn Spanish in 90 days, 15 minutes a day"
+- "Cut your AWS bill 40% without changing a line of code"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Pele limpa em 30 dias — mesmo que nada tenha funcionado antes"
+- "Inglês fluente em 90 dias estudando 15 minutos por dia"
+- "Reduza sua conta de AWS em 40% sem mexer no código"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Solution-aware to product-aware audience (Schwartz Stage 3-4)
+- The benefit is **specific** (a number, a timeframe, an outcome they can visualize)
+- The qualifier kills the loudest objection in the same line
+
+### When it fails
+
+- Cold/unaware audience — no felt need for the outcome yet
+- Saturated market with bigger promises (Schwartz Stage 5 — needs mechanism)
+- Vague benefit ("Be your best self") — sounds like every other ad
+
+---
+
+## 2. Curiosity Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** open a knowledge gap. The prospect can't NOT click to close it.
+
+**Formula:** `The [adjective] [noun] that [unexpected outcome]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "The 4-second exercise that resets your nervous system"
+- "The boring spreadsheet that runs a $200M agency"
+- "The one habit that 80% of millionaires share — and it's not what you'd guess"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "O exercício de 4 segundos que reseta seu sistema nervoso"
+- "A planilha que faz uma agência de R$200M rodar"
+- "O hábito que 80% dos milionários têm — e não é o que você imagina"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Cold or distracted audience — pattern interrupt
+- New mechanism / counter-intuitive method
+- Top of funnel — the click is the conversion goal
+
+### When it fails
+
+- The curiosity gap doesn't pay off in the body — instant trust break
+- The "unexpected outcome" is too generic to be intriguing
+- Sophisticated audience that's seen the formula too many times
+
+---
+
+## 3. Problem-Agitation Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** mirror their pain back to them in their own language.
+
+**Formula:** `[Specific frustrating situation] — [emotional escalation]?`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "Tired of email lists that don't convert no matter how 'optimized' the funnel is?"
+- "If your back hurts every morning, your mattress isn't the problem"
+- "Working 60-hour weeks and still falling behind?"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Cansado de listas de e-mail que não convertem por mais 'otimizado' que o funil seja?"
+- "Se sua coluna dói toda manhã, o problema não é o colchão"
+- "Trabalhando 60 horas por semana e ainda atrasado?"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Problem-aware audience that hasn't found a solution yet (Schwartz Stage 1-2)
+- The pain is specific and recurring (not abstract)
+- The agitation is honest — you know the pain because you've lived it
+
+### When it fails
+
+- Audience already has a solution they like — feels accusatory
+- The pain is overstated (sounds desperate or manipulative)
+- Used at bottom of funnel — they're already past the pain phase
+
+---
+
+## 4. Social Proof Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** borrow credibility from numbers, names, or named outcomes.
+
+**Formula:** `[Number] [people/companies] are using [method] to [outcome]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "How 12,000 SaaS teams cut churn 28% with this 3-step playbook"
+- "The technique that got 47 of our students featured in Forbes"
+- "Why startups with $50M+ ARR are switching from Notion to this"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Como 12.000 times de SaaS reduziram churn em 28% com este playbook de 3 passos"
+- "A técnica que colocou 47 dos nossos alunos na Forbes"
+- "Por que startups com R$50M+ de ARR estão trocando o Notion por isto"
+
+### When it works
+
+- New or unknown brand — proof compensates for absent reputation
+- Skeptical audience that needs herd validation
+- High-ticket purchase where social risk is part of the decision
+
+### When it fails
+
+- The number is round and unverifiable ("10,000 customers!") — sounds fake
+- The proof is generic (unnamed testimonials, stock photos)
+- Audience that prefers exclusivity to popularity (premium / Kennedy-style)
+
+---
+
+## 5. Urgency / FOMO Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** time, scarcity, or loss of access creates immediate decision pressure.
+
+**Formula:** `[Time / scarcity constraint] + [outcome at stake]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "Only 47 spots in the September cohort — and 31 are gone"
+- "Doors close Friday at midnight"
+- "After tomorrow, this price never returns"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Restam 47 vagas na turma de setembro — 31 já preenchidas"
+- "As inscrições fecham sexta à meia-noite"
+- "Depois de amanhã, esse preço não volta"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Bottom-of-funnel readers who are ready but stalling
+- The urgency is **real** (you have actual capacity limits, the price genuinely changes)
+- Reinforced with specifics (a date, a number, a named consequence)
+
+### When it fails
+
+- Fake urgency — every email says "ends tonight" forever. Trust collapses.
+- Top-of-funnel audience that hasn't built desire yet — pressure backfires
+- Used as a primary headline strategy on a brand-new offer (no relationship yet)
+
+**Hard rule:** if the urgency isn't real, don't use this type. Choose another.
+
+---
+
+## 6. How-To Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** explicit promise of actionable instruction.
+
+**Formula:** `How to [desired outcome] without [common pain or sacrifice]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "How to land your first 5 clients without cold-calling"
+- "How to lose 10 lbs without giving up bread"
+- "How to write copy that converts when you're not a writer"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Como conseguir seus primeiros 5 clientes sem fazer cold-call"
+- "Como perder 5kg sem cortar pão"
+- "Como escrever copy que converte mesmo sem ser escritor"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Searchers (Google, YouTube — explicit "how to" intent)
+- Educational content / lead magnets / blog posts / tutorials
+- Content marketing top of funnel — promise teaching, not selling
+
+### When it fails
+
+- Closing-stage copy — the prospect already knows "how", they need to believe THIS works
+- Saturated topic — "How to lose weight" has 10 billion versions. The qualifier ("without giving up bread") is what differentiates.
+
+---
+
+## 7. List / Number Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** numbers signal structure, scannability, finite payoff.
+
+**Formula:** `[Number] [things] that [produce outcome] — [optional differentiator]`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "7 retention experiments that beat industry benchmarks (and 3 that flopped)"
+- "12 hooks that consistently 3x ad CTR — with the data"
+- "The 5 questions every founder must answer before raising"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "7 experimentos de retenção que bateram o benchmark da indústria (e 3 que falharam)"
+- "12 hooks que triplicam o CTR de anúncio — com os dados"
+- "As 5 perguntas que todo founder precisa responder antes de captar"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Skimmers / time-pressed audience
+- Content hubs (blog, newsletter, social posts)
+- Comparison/decision content (5 best X, 7 ways to Y)
+
+### When it fails
+
+- High-ticket sales pages (numbers feel listicle-cheap)
+- Premium/exclusive positioning — listicles imply mass-market
+- The number doesn't deliver in the body — clicked then bounced
+
+**Numbers that punch:** odd numbers (7, 13, 21) and specific weird numbers (47, 312) outperform round (5, 10, 100) on most channels.
+
+---
+
+## 8. Question Headlines
+
+**Mechanism:** force the prospect to mentally answer — self-identification = engagement.
+
+**Formula:** `[Question that mirrors their internal monologue]?`
+
+### Examples
+
+EN:
+- "Are you making the #1 mistake that kills 84% of email funnels?"
+- "Why is your team's productivity dropping every quarter — and what nobody is telling you about it?"
+- "Stuck at $10K MRR for the third month?"
+
+pt-BR:
+- "Você está cometendo o erro #1 que mata 84% dos funis de e-mail?"
+- "Por que a produtividade do seu time cai todo trimestre — e o que ninguém te conta?"
+- "Travado nos R$10 mil mensais pelo terceiro mês seguido?"
+
+### When it works
+
+- Top of funnel — segment self-selection (the right person says "yes that's me")
+- Targeted ads where you know the persona's exact pain
+- Lead magnets / quiz funnels
+
+### When it fails
+
+- The question is rhetorical / obvious ("Do you want more sales?") — eye roll
+- Closing copy — questions delay the decision they should already be making
+- Generic ("Are you ready to grow?") — feels like spam
+
+---
+
+## Type × Master genome compatibility
+
+Different masters lean naturally on different types. Use this when picking which type to lead with for a given master.
+
+| Master | Lead types | Avoid types |
+|---|---|---|
+| Schwartz | Type matches awareness level — Benefit (Stage 3-4), Curiosity (Stage 5), Problem (Stage 1-2) | Generic ones — every type used, but matched to stage |
+| Halbert | Curiosity, Problem-Agitation, Benefit (long-form sales letter leads) | Question (too soft for direct mail) |
+| Kennedy | Benefit, Social Proof (with named credibility), List | Urgency (over-used by amateurs), Curiosity (too tabloid) |
+| Brunson | Curiosity, Question, How-To (storytelling/funnel-friendly) | Pure Urgency without story context |
+| Georgi | Benefit + Mechanism teaser, Curiosity (mechanism-driven) | Generic List, vague Question |
+| Ladeira (BR) | Question, How-To, List, Curiosity (irreverent twist) | Heavy Problem-Agitation (too dark for the brand voice) |
+| Ícaro (BR) | Question (autoral), Curiosity (intellectual contrast), Problem-Agitation (calculated) | List (too commodity), pure Benefit |
+| Diogo Gomes (BR) | Problem-Agitation, Benefit, Urgency (when real), Curiosity | How-To (too soft for the aggressive voice) |
+
+---
+
+## Type × Awareness level (Schwartz model)
+
+This is the master crosswalk — pick a type by where the prospect is in the awareness ladder.
+
+| Awareness level | Best types | Worst types |
+|---|---|---|
+| **Unaware** (no problem named) | Curiosity, Question | Benefit, Urgency, Social Proof |
+| **Problem-aware** | Problem-Agitation, Question, How-To | Urgency, Closing-style Benefit |
+| **Solution-aware** | How-To, List, Benefit | Pure Curiosity (already past it) |
+| **Product-aware** | Benefit, Social Proof, How-To (specific to your method) | Question (too soft) |
+| **Most sophisticated (Stage 5)** | Curiosity (new mechanism), Social Proof (specific outcomes) | Generic Benefit, How-To |
+
+---
+
+## Generation rule for Mode 6 / multi-headline output
+
+When asked to generate a set of headline variations:
+
+1. **Cover at least 5 of the 8 types** — diversity of attack matters
+2. **Tag each headline with its type** — let the user choose by intent, not just gut feel
+3. **Pick a primary** — the one that best matches awareness level + master genome + project tone
+4. **Note WHY** for each — one short clause explaining what the headline does psychologically
+
+Example output structure:
+
+```
+1. [Benefit] "Get clear skin in 30 days — even if nothing else worked"
+   Why: Solution-aware audience; specific outcome + objection killer
+
+2. [Curiosity] "The 4-ingredient routine dermatologists wish was more popular"
+   Why: Pattern interrupt; opens knowledge gap on mechanism
+
+3. [Problem-Agitation] "Tired of waking up to angry skin every morning?"
+   Why: Mirrors daily pain; problem-aware segment
+
+[...]
+
+PRIMARY (recommended): #2 (Curiosity) — audience is mostly cold/distracted
+```
+
+---
+
+## Anti-patterns across all types
+
+- **Mixing types in one headline** — a headline trying to be Benefit + Urgency + Social Proof at once becomes noise
+- **Borrowed specificity** — using a number you didn't earn ("Used by 50,000+ teams" without proof) breaks trust
+- **Stacked qualifiers** — "How to [outcome] without [pain1] without [pain2] without [pain3]" — pick the loudest objection only
+- **Cleverness over clarity** — if the prospect needs to re-read it, you lost them
+
+---
+
+## Source
+
+Synthesis of:
+- Schwartz, *Breakthrough Advertising* (5 awareness levels, mass desire)
+- Halbert, A-Pile / B-Pile direct mail copy
+- Hopkins, *Scientific Advertising* (specificity rule)
+- Modern direct response data (CTR breakdowns by headline type, 2020-2025)
+- Internal AIOSON copywriter genome (5-Act, One Belief, market sophistication)