@devo-bmad-custom/agent-orchestration 1.0.2 → 1.0.4

package/src/bmb/workflows/workflow/steps-c/step-02-classification.md

@@ -1,270 +1,270 @@
----
-name: 'step-02-classification'
-description: 'Classify the workflow by answering the 4 key structural decisions'
-
-nextStepFile: './step-03-requirements.md'
-workflowTypeCriteria: '../data/workflow-type-criteria.md'
-workflowPlanFile: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/workflows/{new_workflow_name}/workflow-plan-{new_workflow_name}.md'
-bmbCreationsOutputFolder: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}'
-customWorkflowLocation: '{custom_workflow_location}'
----
-
-# Step 2: Workflow Classification
-
-## STEP GOAL:
-
-To determine the 4 key structural decisions that define how the workflow will be built: module affiliation, continuable vs single-session, tri-modal vs create-only, and document output.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
-
-### Universal Rules:
-
-- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
-- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
-- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
-- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
-- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
-
-### Role Reinforcement:
-
-- ✅ You are a workflow architect helping classify their workflow
-- ✅ Explain the trade-offs of each decision clearly
-- ✅ Help them make informed choices
-- ✅ These 4 decisions affect the entire workflow structure
-
-### Step-Specific Rules:
-
-- 🎯 Focus ONLY on the 4 key structural decisions
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip any of the 4 decisions
-- 💬 Explain each decision in plain language before asking
-- 🚪 These decisions determine file structure, naming, and location
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
-
-- 🎯 Load workflowTypeCriteria for the decision framework
-- 💾 Document each decision in the plan
-- 📖 Update frontmatter stepsCompleted when complete
-- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until all 4 decisions are made
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
-
-- Discovery from Step 1 informs these decisions
-- These are STRUCTURAL decisions that affect everything else
-- Once made, changing them is difficult
-- Take time to explain trade-offs
-
-## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
-
-**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
-
-### 0. Load Decision Framework
-
-Load `{workflowTypeCriteria}` to understand the 4 key decisions and their implications.
-
-### 1. Decision 1: Document Output (FIRST - It's Fundamental)
-
-"**Let's classify your workflow. I'll walk you through 4 key decisions that determine how it's built.**
-
-**Decision 1: What does your workflow produce?**
-
-Based on your idea from discovery, let me clarify:"
-
-- [If unclear from discovery] "Does this workflow produce a document or file at the end? A report, a plan, a story, a checklist?"
-
-Present the two options:
-
-**A. Document-Producing**
-- Creates a persistent output file
-- Examples: reports, plans, stories, checklists, forms
-- Uses templates for structure
-
-**B. Non-Document**
-- Performs actions without creating a document
-- Examples: refactoring code, running tests, orchestrating tools
-- May produce temporary files but no persistent output
-
-"Which describes your workflow?"
-
-**Think about their response before continuing...**
-
-Once decided:
-- Document: `workflowProducesDocuments: true`
-- Non-document: `workflowProducesDocuments: false`
-
-### 2. Decision 2: Module Affiliation
-
-"**Decision 2: Where will this workflow live?**
-
-Workflows can be standalone or part of a module:"
-
-**Standalone:**
-- NOT part of any module
-- Stored in your custom location
-- Only standard variables available
-
-**Module-Based (BMB, BMM, CIS, BMGD, etc.):**
-- Part of a specific module
-- Has access to module-specific variables
-- Stored in that module's workflows directory
-
-"Is this workflow:
-- **A)** Standalone - just for you/custom use
-- **B)** Part of a module - which one?"
-
-**If they don't know modules:**
-"Modules are specialized areas:
-- **BMB** - Module building workflows
-- **BMM** - Software development workflows (PRDs, architecture, etc.)
-- **CIS** - Innovation and creative workflows
-- **BMGD** - Game development workflows
-- **Custom** - Your own workflows
-
-Does your workflow fit into one of these areas, or is it standalone?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 3. Decision 3: Continuable or Single-Session
-
-"**Decision 3: Could this workflow take multiple sessions to complete?**
-
-Think about: Will this workflow consume many tokens or take a long time? Might users need to pause and come back later?"
-
-**Single-Session:**
-- Quick, focused workflows (15-30 minutes)
-- Simpler structure
-- No continuation logic needed
-
-**Continuable:**
-- Can span multiple sessions
-- Complex, many steps
-- Saves progress, can resume later
-- Needs `step-01b-continue.md`
-
-"Is your workflow:
-- **A)** Single-session - quick and focused
-- **B)** Continuable - could take multiple sessions"
-
-**Help them think:**
-- "Walk me through how long you think this would take..."
-- "What happens if someone gets halfway through and has to stop?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 4. Decision 4: Create-Only or Tri-Modal
-
-"**Decision 4: Will this workflow need Edit and Validate capabilities?**
-
-Some workflows are simple - you create them once and use them. Others need full lifecycle support:**
-
-**Create-Only:**
-- Just `steps-c/` (create steps)
-- Simpler, faster to build
-- Good for: experimental workflows, one-off use, simple tools
-
-**Tri-Modal (Create + Edit + Validate):**
-- Has `steps-c/`, `steps-e/` (edit), and `steps-v/` (validate)
-- Full lifecycle support
-- Can be modified and validated after creation
-- Good for: complex workflows, maintained workflows, team use
-
-"Do you envision:
-- **A)** Create-only - build it and use it
-- **B)** Tri-modal - create, edit, AND validate capabilities"
-
-**If they're unsure:**
-"Think: Will you or others want to modify this workflow later? Does it need quality checking/validation?"
-
-Document the result.
-
-### 5. Name the Workflow
-
-"Now that we understand what this workflow IS, let's name it properly.
-
-Based on everything we've discovered, what would you call this?
-
-Some guidance:
-- Use kebab-case: `my-workflow-name`
-- Be descriptive but concise
-- Think: What would someone search for to find this?
-
-[Offer suggestions based on their vision]"
-
-**Check for uniqueness:**
-- Look for folder at `{bmb_creationsOutputFolder}/workflows/{proposed-name}/`
-- If exists: "That name is taken. Want to try a variant like...?"
-- Loop until unique name confirmed
-
-Document the final name.
-
-### 6. Confirm Target Location
-
-Based on module decision, confirm and document the target path:
-
-**For standalone/custom:**
-- Target: `{customWorkflowLocation}/{workflow-name}/`
-- Typically: `_bmad/custom/src/workflows/{workflow-name}/`
-
-**For modules:**
-- Check module's workflow location from module.yaml
-- Confirm path with user
-
-Document: `targetWorkflowPath: [confirmed path]`
-
-### 7. Update Plan with Classification
-
-Update `{workflowPlanFile}`:
-
-```markdown
-## Classification Decisions
-
-**Workflow Name:** {name}
-**Target Path:** {targetWorkflowPath}
-
-**4 Key Decisions:**
-1. **Document Output:** {true/false}
-2. **Module Affiliation:** {standalone/module-name}
-3. **Session Type:** {single-session/continuable}
-4. **Lifecycle Support:** {create-only/tri-modal}
-
-**Structure Implications:**
-- [Document what this means: e.g., "Needs steps-c/, steps-e/, steps-v/", "Needs step-01b-continue.md", etc.]
-```
-
-### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [AR] Adversarial Review [C] Continue
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and redisplay menu
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml
-- IF P: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md
-- IF AR: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml — pass the current editPlan (or plan document in context) as the content to review; display findings with recommendations; then redisplay this menu
-- IF C: Update plan frontmatter with stepsCompleted and classification, then load `{nextStepFile}`
-- IF Any other: Help user, then redisplay menu
-
----
-
-## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
-
-### ✅ SUCCESS:
-
-- All 4 key decisions made and documented
-- Workflow named appropriately
-- Target location confirmed
-- Structural implications understood
-- Plan updated with classification
-
-### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
-
-- Skipping any of the 4 key decisions
-- Naming before understanding (old pattern)
-- Not explaining trade-offs
-- Not checking for name conflicts
-
-**Master Rule:** The 4 key decisions determine everything else. Get them right before proceeding.
+---
+name: 'step-02-classification'
+description: 'Classify the workflow by answering the 4 key structural decisions'
+
+nextStepFile: './step-03-requirements.md'
+workflowTypeCriteria: '../data/workflow-type-criteria.md'
+workflowPlanFile: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/workflows/{new_workflow_name}/workflow-plan-{new_workflow_name}.md'
+bmbCreationsOutputFolder: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}'
+customWorkflowLocation: '{custom_workflow_location}'
+---
+
+# Step 2: Workflow Classification
+
+## STEP GOAL:
+
+To determine the 4 key structural decisions that define how the workflow will be built: module affiliation, continuable vs single-session, tri-modal vs create-only, and document output.
+
+## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES (READ FIRST):
+
+### Universal Rules:
+
+- 🛑 NEVER generate content without user input
+- 📖 CRITICAL: Read the complete step file before taking any action
+- 🔄 CRITICAL: When loading next step with 'C', ensure entire file is read
+- 📋 YOU ARE A FACILITATOR, not a content generator
+- ✅ YOU MUST ALWAYS SPEAK OUTPUT In your Agent communication style with the config `{communication_language}`
+
+### Role Reinforcement:
+
+- ✅ You are a workflow architect helping classify their workflow
+- ✅ Explain the trade-offs of each decision clearly
+- ✅ Help them make informed choices
+- ✅ These 4 decisions affect the entire workflow structure
+
+### Step-Specific Rules:
+
+- 🎯 Focus ONLY on the 4 key structural decisions
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to skip any of the 4 decisions
+- 💬 Explain each decision in plain language before asking
+- 🚪 These decisions determine file structure, naming, and location
+
+## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS:
+
+- 🎯 Load workflowTypeCriteria for the decision framework
+- 💾 Document each decision in the plan
+- 📖 Update frontmatter stepsCompleted when complete
+- 🚫 FORBIDDEN to load next step until all 4 decisions are made
+
+## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES:
+
+- Discovery from Step 1 informs these decisions
+- These are STRUCTURAL decisions that affect everything else
+- Once made, changing them is difficult
+- Take time to explain trade-offs
+
+## MANDATORY SEQUENCE
+
+**CRITICAL:** Follow this sequence exactly. Do not skip, reorder, or improvise unless user explicitly requests a change.
+
+### 0. Load Decision Framework
+
+Load `{workflowTypeCriteria}` to understand the 4 key decisions and their implications.
+
+### 1. Decision 1: Document Output (FIRST - It's Fundamental)
+
+"**Let's classify your workflow. I'll walk you through 4 key decisions that determine how it's built.**
+
+**Decision 1: What does your workflow produce?**
+
+Based on your idea from discovery, let me clarify:"
+
+- [If unclear from discovery] "Does this workflow produce a document or file at the end? A report, a plan, a story, a checklist?"
+
+Present the two options:
+
+**A. Document-Producing**
+- Creates a persistent output file
+- Examples: reports, plans, stories, checklists, forms
+- Uses templates for structure
+
+**B. Non-Document**
+- Performs actions without creating a document
+- Examples: refactoring code, running tests, orchestrating tools
+- May produce temporary files but no persistent output
+
+"Which describes your workflow?"
+
+**Think about their response before continuing...**
+
+Once decided:
+- Document: `workflowProducesDocuments: true`
+- Non-document: `workflowProducesDocuments: false`
+
+### 2. Decision 2: Module Affiliation
+
+"**Decision 2: Where will this workflow live?**
+
+Workflows can be standalone or part of a module:"
+
+**Standalone:**
+- NOT part of any module
+- Stored in your custom location
+- Only standard variables available
+
+**Module-Based (BMB, BMM, CIS, BMGD, etc.):**
+- Part of a specific module
+- Has access to module-specific variables
+- Stored in that module's workflows directory
+
+"Is this workflow:
+- **A)** Standalone - just for you/custom use
+- **B)** Part of a module - which one?"
+
+**If they don't know modules:**
+"Modules are specialized areas:
+- **BMB** - Module building workflows
+- **BMM** - Software development workflows (PRDs, architecture, etc.)
+- **CIS** - Innovation and creative workflows
+- **BMGD** - Game development workflows
+- **Custom** - Your own workflows
+
+Does your workflow fit into one of these areas, or is it standalone?"
+
+Document the result.
+
+### 3. Decision 3: Continuable or Single-Session
+
+"**Decision 3: Could this workflow take multiple sessions to complete?**
+
+Think about: Will this workflow consume many tokens or take a long time? Might users need to pause and come back later?"
+
+**Single-Session:**
+- Quick, focused workflows (15-30 minutes)
+- Simpler structure
+- No continuation logic needed
+
+**Continuable:**
+- Can span multiple sessions
+- Complex, many steps
+- Saves progress, can resume later
+- Needs `step-01b-continue.md`
+
+"Is your workflow:
+- **A)** Single-session - quick and focused
+- **B)** Continuable - could take multiple sessions"
+
+**Help them think:**
+- "Walk me through how long you think this would take..."
+- "What happens if someone gets halfway through and has to stop?"
+
+Document the result.
+
+### 4. Decision 4: Create-Only or Tri-Modal
+
+"**Decision 4: Will this workflow need Edit and Validate capabilities?**
+
+Some workflows are simple - you create them once and use them. Others need full lifecycle support:**
+
+**Create-Only:**
+- Just `steps-c/` (create steps)
+- Simpler, faster to build
+- Good for: experimental workflows, one-off use, simple tools
+
+**Tri-Modal (Create + Edit + Validate):**
+- Has `steps-c/`, `steps-e/` (edit), and `steps-v/` (validate)
+- Full lifecycle support
+- Can be modified and validated after creation
+- Good for: complex workflows, maintained workflows, team use
+
+"Do you envision:
+- **A)** Create-only - build it and use it
+- **B)** Tri-modal - create, edit, AND validate capabilities"
+
+**If they're unsure:**
+"Think: Will you or others want to modify this workflow later? Does it need quality checking/validation?"
+
+Document the result.
+
+### 5. Name the Workflow
+
+"Now that we understand what this workflow IS, let's name it properly.
+
+Based on everything we've discovered, what would you call this?
+
+Some guidance:
+- Use kebab-case: `my-workflow-name`
+- Be descriptive but concise
+- Think: What would someone search for to find this?
+
+[Offer suggestions based on their vision]"
+
+**Check for uniqueness:**
+- Look for folder at `{bmb_creationsOutputFolder}/workflows/{proposed-name}/`
+- If exists: "That name is taken. Want to try a variant like...?"
+- Loop until unique name confirmed
+
+Document the final name.
+
+### 6. Confirm Target Location
+
+Based on module decision, confirm and document the target path:
+
+**For standalone/custom:**
+- Target: `{customWorkflowLocation}/{workflow-name}/`
+- Typically: `_bmad/custom/src/workflows/{workflow-name}/`
+
+**For modules:**
+- Check module's workflow location from module.yaml
+- Confirm path with user
+
+Document: `targetWorkflowPath: [confirmed path]`
+
+### 7. Update Plan with Classification
+
+Update `{workflowPlanFile}`:
+
+```markdown
+## Classification Decisions
+
+**Workflow Name:** {name}
+**Target Path:** {targetWorkflowPath}
+
+**4 Key Decisions:**
+1. **Document Output:** {true/false}
+2. **Module Affiliation:** {standalone/module-name}
+3. **Session Type:** {single-session/continuable}
+4. **Lifecycle Support:** {create-only/tri-modal}
+
+**Structure Implications:**
+- [Document what this means: e.g., "Needs steps-c/, steps-e/, steps-v/", "Needs step-01b-continue.md", etc.]
+```
+
+### 8. Present MENU OPTIONS
+
+Display: **Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [P] Party Mode [AR] Adversarial Review [C] Continue
+
+#### EXECUTION RULES:
+
+- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input
+- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
+- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and redisplay menu
+
+#### Menu Handling Logic:
+
+- IF A: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml
+- IF P: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md
+- IF AR: Execute {project-root}/_bmad/core/tasks/review-adversarial-general.xml — pass the current editPlan (or plan document in context) as the content to review; display findings with recommendations; then redisplay this menu
+- IF C: Update plan frontmatter with stepsCompleted and classification, then load `{nextStepFile}`
+- IF Any other: Help user, then redisplay menu
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 SYSTEM SUCCESS/FAILURE METRICS
+
+### ✅ SUCCESS:
+
+- All 4 key decisions made and documented
+- Workflow named appropriately
+- Target location confirmed
+- Structural implications understood
+- Plan updated with classification
+
+### ❌ SYSTEM FAILURE:
+
+- Skipping any of the 4 key decisions
+- Naming before understanding (old pattern)
+- Not explaining trade-offs
+- Not checking for name conflicts
+
+**Master Rule:** The 4 key decisions determine everything else. Get them right before proceeding.